Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The liver-clock coordinates rhythmicity of peripheral tissues in response to feeding

Nature Metabolism volume 3, pages 829–842 (2021)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

The mammalian circadian system consists of a central clock in the brain that synchronizes clocks in the peripheral tissues. Although the hierarchy between central and peripheral clocks is established, little is known regarding the specificity and functional organization of peripheral clocks. Here, we employ altered feeding paradigms in conjunction with liver-clock mutant mice to map disparities and interactions between peripheral rhythms. We find that peripheral clocks largely differ in their responses to feeding time. Disruption of the liver-clock, despite its prominent role in nutrient processing, does not affect the rhythmicity of clocks in other peripheral tissues. Yet, unexpectedly, liver-clock disruption strongly modulates the transcriptional rhythmicity of peripheral tissues, primarily on daytime feeding. Concomitantly, liver-clock mutant mice exhibit impaired glucose and lipid homeostasis, which are aggravated by daytime feeding. Overall, our findings suggest that, upon nutrient challenge, the liver-clock buffers the effect of feeding-related signals on rhythmicity of peripheral tissues, irrespective of their clocks.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Feeding differentially affects clocks in peripheral tissues.
Fig. 2: Daytime-restricted feeding affects the rhythmic transcriptome in a tissue-specific manner.
Fig. 3: The liver-clock does not affect clock rhythmicity in other peripheral tissues.
Fig. 4: The liver-clock modulates the response of the WAT and lung rhythmic transcriptomes to DF.
Fig. 5: The liver-clock affects the composition of lung and WAT rhythmic transcriptome.
Fig. 6: Impaired glucose homeostasis in liver-clock-deficient mice in response to DF.
Fig. 7: The liver-clock affects body weight and composition in response to DF.

Data availability

The RNA-seq data are available from the GEO under accession no. GSE159135. Figures 1 and 3 and Extended Data Figs. 1 and 3 are associated with the statistical analysis available in Supplementary Data 1. In addition, the unprocessed blots of Fig. 1g are available as Source Data with this paper. Figures 2, 4, 5 and 6a and Extended Data Figs. 4 and 6 are associated with the RNA-seq data (raw and processed data accessible through the GEO) and with the statistical analysis available in Supplementary Data 2. Extended Data Figs. 2, 5 and 6c are associated with the complete results presented in Supplementary Data 3. Extended Data Fig. 4d,e is associated with the complete results presented in Supplementary Data 4. Extended Data Fig. 6d is associated with the complete results presented in Supplementary Data 5. All other data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  1. Schibler, U. et al. Clock-Talk: interactions between central and peripheral circadian oscillators in mammals. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 80, 223–232 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mohawk, J. A., Green, C. B. & Takahashi, J. S. Central and peripheral circadian clocks in mammals. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 35, 445–462 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Albrecht, U. Timing to perfection: the biology of central and peripheral circadian clocks. Neuron 74, 246–260 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dibner, C., Schibler, U. & Albrecht, U. The mammalian circadian timing system: organization and coordination of central and peripheral clocks. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 72, 517–549 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Reinke, H. & Asher, G. Crosstalk between metabolism and circadian clocks. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 227–241 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pickel, L. & Sung, H.-K. Feeding rhythms and the circadian regulation of metabolism. Front. Nutr. 7, 39 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Damiola, F. et al. Restricted feeding uncouples circadian oscillators in peripheral tissues from the central pacemaker in the suprachiasmatic nucleus. Genes Dev. 14, 2950–2961 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Mukherji, A., Kobiita, A. & Chambon, P. Shifting the feeding of mice to the rest phase creates metabolic alterations, which, on their own, shift the peripheral circadian clocks by 12 hours. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E6683–E6690 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Mukherji, A. et al. Shifting eating to the circadian rest phase misaligns the peripheral clocks with the master SCN clock and leads to a metabolic syndrome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E6691–E6698 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Stokkan, K. A., Yamazaki, S., Tei, H., Sakaki, Y. & Menaker, M. Entrainment of the circadian clock in the liver by feeding. Science 291, 490–493 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vollmers, C. et al. Time of feeding and the intrinsic circadian clock drive rhythms in hepatic gene expression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 21453–21458 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Yeung, J. & Naef, F. Rhythms of the genome: circadian dynamics from chromatin topology, tissue-specific gene expression, to behavior. Trends Genet. 34, 915–926 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ruben, M. D. et al. A database of tissue-specific rhythmically expressed human genes has potential applications in circadian medicine. Sci. Transl. Med. 10, eaat8806 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Manella, G. et al. Hypoxia induces a time- and tissue-specific response that elicits intertissue circadian clock misalignment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 779–786 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Asher, G. et al. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 participates in the phase entrainment of circadian clocks to feeding. Cell 142, 943–953 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bray, M. S. et al. Quantitative analysis of light-phase restricted feeding reveals metabolic dyssynchrony in mice. Int. J. Obes. (Lond.) 37, 843–852 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gilbert, M. R., Douris, N., Tongjai, S. & Green, C. B. Nocturnin expression is induced by fasting in the white adipose tissue of restricted fed mice. PLoS ONE 6, e17051 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Zvonic, S. et al. Characterization of peripheral circadian clocks in adipose tissues. Diabetes 55, 962–970 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hughes, M. E., Hogenesch, J. B. & Kornacker, K. JTK_CYCLE: an efficient nonparametric algorithm for detecting rhythmic components in genome-scale data sets. J. Biol. Rhythms 25, 372–380 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Greenwell, B. J. et al. Rhythmic food intake drives rhythmic gene expression more potently than the hepatic circadian clock in mice. Cell Rep. 27, 649–657.e5 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kornmann, B., Schaad, O., Bujard, H., Takahashi, J. S. & Schibler, U. System-driven and oscillator-dependent circadian transcription in mice with a conditionally active liver clock. PLoS Biol. 5, e34 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Koronowski, K. B. et al. Defining the independence of the liver circadian clock. Cell 177, 1448–1462.e14 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Welz, P.-S. et al. BMAL1-driven tissue clocks respond independently to light to maintain homeostasis. Cell 178, 1029 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Reinke, H. & Asher, G. Circadian clock control of liver metabolic functions. Gastroenterology 150, 574–580 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Asher, G. & Sassone-Corsi, P. Time for food: the intimate interplay between nutrition, metabolism, and the circadian clock. Cell 161, 84–92 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lamia, K. A., Storch, K.-F. & Weitz, C. J. Physiological significance of a peripheral tissue circadian clock. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 15172–15177 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Guan, D. et al. The hepatocyte clock and feeding control chronophysiology of multiple liver cell types. Science 369, 1388–1394 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Doi, R., Oishi, K. & Ishida, N. CLOCK regulates circadian rhythms of hepatic glycogen synthesis through transcriptional activation of Gys2. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 22114–22121 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Díaz-Muñoz, M. et al. Daytime food restriction alters liver glycogen, triacylglycerols, and cell size. A histochemical, morphometric, and ultrastructural study. Comp. Hepatol. 9, 5 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Sinturel, F. et al. Diurnal oscillations in liver mass and cell size accompany ribosome assembly cycles. Cell 169, 651–663.e14 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang, H. et al. Time-restricted feeding shifts the skin circadian clock and alters UVB-induced DNA damage. Cell Rep. 20, 1061–1072 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Minami, Y., Horikawa, K., Akiyama, M. & Shibata, S. Restricted feeding induces daily expression of clock genes and Pai-1 mRNA in the heart of Clock mutant mice. FEBS Lett. 526, 115–118 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Opperhuizen, A.-L. et al. Feeding during the resting phase causes profound changes in physiology and desynchronization between liver and muscle rhythms of rats. Eur. J. Neurosci. 44, 2795–2806 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Reznick, J. et al. Altered feeding differentially regulates circadian rhythms and energy metabolism in liver and muscle of rats. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1832, 228–238 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tahara, Y. et al. Entrainment of the mouse circadian clock by sub-acute physical and psychological stress. Sci. Rep. 5, 11417 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Woller, A. & Gonze, D. Modeling clock-related metabolic syndrome due to conflicting light and food cues. Sci. Rep. 8, 13641 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Bae, S.-A. & Androulakis, I. P. The synergistic role of light-feeding phase relations on entraining robust circadian rhythms in the periphery. Gene Regul. Syst. Bio. 11, 1177625017702393 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Adamovich, Y., Ladeuix, B., Golik, M., Koeners, M. P. & Asher, G. Rhythmic oxygen levels reset circadian clocks through HIF1α. Cell Metab. 25, 93–101 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Adamovich, Y. et al. Oxygen and carbon dioxide rhythms are circadian clock controlled and differentially directed by behavioral signals. Cell Metab. 29, 1092–1103.e3 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Buhr, E. D., Yoo, S.-H. & Takahashi, J. S. Temperature as a universal resetting cue for mammalian circadian oscillators. Science 330, 379–385 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Pezük, P., Mohawk, J. A., Wang, L. A. & Menaker, M. Glucocorticoids as entraining signals for peripheral circadian oscillators. Endocrinology 153, 4775–4783 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Crosby, P. et al. Insulin/IGF-1 drives PERIOD synthesis to entrain circadian rhythms with feeding time. Cell 177, 896–909.e20 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Hamada, T. et al. In vivo imaging of clock gene expression in multiple tissues of freely moving mice. Nat. Commun. 7, 11705 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Sinturel, F. et al. Circadian hepatocyte clocks keep synchrony in the absence of a master pacemaker in the suprachiasmatic nucleus or other extrahepatic clocks. Genes Dev. 35, 329–334 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Matsumura, T. et al. Liver-specific dysregulation of clock-controlled output signal impairs energy metabolism in liver and muscle. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 534, 415–421 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. van den Berghe, G. The role of the liver in metabolic homeostasis: implications for inborn errors of metabolism. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 14, 407–420 (1991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Gachon, F., Loizides-Mangold, U., Petrenko, V. & Dibner, C. Glucose homeostasis: regulation by peripheral circadian clocks in rodents and humans. Endocrinology 158, 1074–1084 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Gatfield, D. & Schibler, U. Circadian glucose homeostasis requires compensatory interference between brain and liver clocks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 14753–14754 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Kalsbeek, A., la Fleur, S. & Fliers, E. Circadian control of glucose metabolism. Mol. Metab. 3, 372–383 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Priest, C. & Tontonoz, P. Inter-organ cross-talk in metabolic syndrome. Nat. Metab. 1, 1177–1188 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Wu, G., Anafi, R. C., Hughes, M. E., Kornacker, K. & Hogenesch, J. B. MetaCycle: an integrated R package to evaluate periodicity in large scale data. Bioinformatics 32, 3351–3353 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Jaitin, D. A. et al. Massively parallel single-cell RNA-seq for marker-free decomposition of tissues into cell types. Science 343, 776–779 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Kohen, R. et al. UTAP: User-friendly Transcriptome Analysis Pipeline. BMC Bioinformatics 20, 154 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 17, 10–12 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Anders, S., Pyl, P. T. & Huber, W. HTSeq—a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31, 166–169 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Strimmer, K. fdrtool: a versatile R package for estimating local and tail area-based false discovery rates. Bioinformatics 24, 1461–1462 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Lück, S., Thurley, K., Thaben, P. F. & Westermark, P. O. Rhythmic degradation explains and unifies circadian transcriptome and proteome data. Cell Rep. 9, 741–751 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Wang, X. et al. An R package suite for microarray meta-analysis in quality control, differentially expressed gene analysis and pathway enrichment detection. Bioinformatics 28, 2534–2536 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Singer, J. M. & Hughey, J. J. LimoRhyde: a flexible approach for differential analysis of rhythmic transcriptome data. J. Biol. Rhythms 34, 5–18 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Agostinelli, C. & Lund, U. R package ‘circular': Circular Statistics v.0.4-93) (2017); https://r-forge.r-project.org/projects/circular/

  63. Jammalamadaka, S. R. & Sengupta, A. Topics in Circular Statistics (World Scientific, 2001).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  64. Ashburner, M. et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat. Genet. 25, 25–29 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. The Gene Ontology Consortium The Gene Ontology Resource: 20 years and still GOing strong. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D330–D338 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Yu, G., Wang, L.-G., Han, Y. & He, Q.-Y. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS 16, 284–287 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Zhang, R., Podtelezhnikov, A. A., Hogenesch, J. B. & Anafi, R. C. Discovering biology in periodic data through phase set enrichment analysis (PSEA). J. Biol. Rhythms 31, 244–257 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Durinck, S., Spellman, P. T., Birney, E. & Huber, W. Mapping identifiers for the integration of genomic datasets with the R/Bioconductor package biomaRt. Nat. Protoc. 4, 1184–1191 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15545–15550 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Use R!) (Springer, 2016).

  71. Gu, Z., Eils, R. & Schlesner, M. Complex heatmaps reveal patterns and correlations in multidimensional genomic data. Bioinformatics 32, 2847–2849 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the members of the Asher lab for their comments on the manuscript. We thank L. Flur and E. Elinav for their aid with plasma measurements and Y. Kuperman for her assistance with the metabolic cages. G.A. is supported by the European Research Council (ERC-2017 CIRCOMMUNICATION 770869), Abisch-Frenkel Foundation for the Promotion of Life Sciences, Adelis Foundation and Susan and Michael Stern. E.S. received a Martin Kushner Schnur and Armando and Maria Jinich postdoctoral fellowship for Mexican citizens.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Elizabeth Sabath

    Present address: Department of Medicine, Institute for transformative molecular medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biomolecular Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel

    Gal Manella, Elizabeth Sabath, Rona Aviram, Vaishnavi Dandavate, Saar Ezagouri, Marina Golik, Yaarit Adamovich & Gad Asher

Authors
  1. Gal Manella
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elizabeth Sabath
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rona Aviram
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Vaishnavi Dandavate
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Saar Ezagouri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Marina Golik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yaarit Adamovich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Gad Asher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

G.M. and G.A. conceptualized the study. G.M., E.S., R.A., V.D., S.E., M.G. and Y.A. carried out the investigation. G.M. carried out the data visualization. G.M. curated the data. G.M. implemented the software. G.A. obtained the funding. G.M. and G.A. wrote, edited and reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gad Asher.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Metabolism thanks Frederic Gachon and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: George Caputa.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Feeding differentially affects clocks in peripheral tissues.

Quantitative PCR results from mice (AlbCre) fed either ad libitum (AL) or exclusively during the light-phase (DF) for 30 days. Samples were collected at 2 h intervals for 24 h (n = 2 biologically independent mice per time point). Presented are representative clock genes from the (a) liver, (b) White Adipose Tissue (WAT), (c) lung, (d) quadriceps muscle, (e) kidney, and (f) heart. Dots mark individual measurements in each Zeitgeber Time (ZT). Significant rhythms according to JTK_CYCLE are denoted by cosine fit curve according to the captions, with a vertical line representing the phase; dashed curves represent non-significant (ns) rhythms. Note that the profiles for Arntl and Nr1d1 are re-plotted from Fig. 1a–f and are included here as well to enable side-by-side comparison with other clock genes in each tissue.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Daytime-restricted feeding affects the rhythmic transcriptome in a tissue-specific manner.

Gene Ontology (GO) Biological Processes (BP) enrichment analysis of rhythmic genes in mice fed either ad libitum (AL) or exclusively during the light-phase (DF) for 30 days in (a) liver, (b) WAT, and (c) lung (P < 0.05, over-representation test).

Extended Data Fig. 3 The liver-clock does not affect clock-rhythmicity in other peripheral tissues.

Quantitative PCR results of clock gene expression of liver-clock mutant mice (BLKO), fed either ad libitum (AL, upper panels) or exclusively during the light-phase (DF, lower panels) for 30 days. Samples were collected at 2 h intervals for 24 h (n = 2 biologically independent mice per time point). Presented are representative clock genes from the (a) liver, (b) WAT, (c) lung, (d) quadriceps muscle, (e) kidney, and (f) heart. Dots mark individual measurements in each Zeitgeber Time (ZT). Significant rhythms according to JTK_CYCLE are denoted by cosine fit curve according to the captions, with a vertical line representing the phase; dashed curves represent non-significant (ns) rhythms.

Extended Data Fig. 4 The liver-clock affects the composition of lung and WAT rhythmic transcriptome.

a, The transcriptomic data of either WAT or lung was subdivided into 15 subsets, based on their rhythmicity in each of the four conditions (AlbCre AL, AlbCre DF, BLKO AL, BLKO DF). For each condition a gene is consider rhythmic if overall Qmin < 0.05, and PHR < 0.05 in this condition (JTK_CYCLE and Harmonic Regression, see also Methods section). Depicted is a tabular summary of all the subsets and categories (L-Bmal1 = Liver-Bmal1). (b, c) Bar plot representation of the size of each subset in WAT (b) and lung (c), with coloration according to the categories as in (a). (d, e) Ingenuity Upstream Regulators analysis for each category in WAT (d) and lung (e) (presented are transcriptional regulators, P < 0.001, and at least 20 targets in the category).

Extended Data Fig. 5 Enrichment analysis for functional annotations of the different rhythmic categories.

Gene Ontology (GO) Biological Processes (BP) enrichment analysis of rhythmic genes which either loss their rhythmicity in BLKO (‘Loss’), or gained rhythmicity in BLKO (‘Gain’), or where not affected by BLKO (‘Retain’) in (a) WAT and (b) lung. (P < 0.05, over-representation test).

Extended Data Fig. 6 Impaired glucose homeostasis in liver-clock deficient mice in response to day feeding.

(a-c) Around-the-clock transcriptomic analysis of livers from either AlbCre control mice or liver-clock deficient mice (BLKO) fed either ad libitum (AL) or exclusively during the light-phase (DF) for 30 days. (a) Pie chart representing the distribution of genes between the different rhythmicity categories (see Fig. S4 for details). (b) Bar-plot representing the sizes of each rhythmicity subset (see Fig. S4 for details). (c) Gene Ontology (GO) Biological Processes (BP) enrichment analysis of rhythmic genes from the RRNN subset (P < 0.05, over-representation test). (d) Phase Set Enrichment Analysis of GO terms in WAT of AlbCre (left panel) or BLKO (right panel) mice. Only terms that are significantly phase-enriched in both ad libitum (AL) and day fed animals (DF) are presented (P < 0.05, Kuiper test), and the phase differences between the two regimens are depicted.

Extended Data Fig. 7 Behavioral and metabolic characterization of control and liver-clock deficient mice.

(a) Intra-Peritoneal Glucose Tolerance Test (IPGTT) analysis AlbCre or BLKO mice fed ad libitum (AL), performed at ZT10 after 2 h of food deprivation (Circles - individual mice, lines - mean levels; 2-way ANOVA with repeated measures design; AlbCre n = 9 mice, BLKO n = 8 mice). (b) IPGTT results from day-fed (DF) AlbCre or BLKO mice, performed at ZT22 (due to the daytime feeding, these mice were food deprived for 10 h), (Circles - individual mice, lines - mean levels; 2-way ANOVA with repeated measures design; n = 7 mice per condition). (c) Area Under the glucose Curve (AUC), as calculated for the data in (a-b), (two-sided Student’s t-test, n as in (a) and (b); boxplots: middle line= median, box= 25th to 75th Inter Quantile Range (IQR), whiskers= the largest/smallest value no greater/smaller than 1.5*IQR, outlier points= measurements outside this range). (d-g) Mice fed either ad libitum (AL) or exclusively during the light-phase (DF) for 4 weeks and were analyzed in metabolic cages for three consecutive days under the same feeding regimens. (d) Food consumption, (e) activity, (f) Respiratory Exchange Rate (RER), and (g) Energy Expenditure (EE) are presented. The data is presented as average of individual mice (n = 3 mice per genotype in AL, n = 4 mice per genotype in DF), with 1 h binning of the data (original measurements were taken every 15 minutes).

Supplementary information

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Data 1

Rhythmicity analysis of qPCR data.

Supplementary Data 2

Summary tables of the statistical analyses.

Supplementary Data 3

GO term enrichment analyses.

Supplementary Data 4

Ingenuity upstream regulator analysis.

Supplementary Data 5

PSEA results.

Supplementary Table 1

qPCR primers.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Unprocessed western blots.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Manella, G., Sabath, E., Aviram, R. et al. The liver-clock coordinates rhythmicity of peripheral tissues in response to feeding. Nat Metab 3, 829–842 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-021-00395-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-021-00395-7

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing