Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

The surprising history of abstracts

The abstract as a 200-word summary that readers click through to access a full article is a staple of scientific publishing. But as Aileen Fyfe explains, this is only one of the roles that abstracts have performed in the history of scientific communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Bragg, W. H. Address of the President, 1938. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Sci. 169, 1–24 (1938).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fyfe, A., Moxham, N., McDougall-Waters, J. & Røstvik, C. M. in A History of Scientific Journals: Publishing at the Royal Society 1665–2015 (UCL Press, 2022).

  3. Manzer, B. M. The Abstract Journal, 1792–1920: Origin, Development and Diffusion (Scarecrow Press, 1977).

  4. History of science abstracts and Inspec. The IET https://www.theiet.org/membership/library-and-archives/the-iet-archives/iet-history/history-of-science-abstracts-and-inspec/inspec-history-1898-1914 (2024).

  5. British Chemical Abstracts. Nature 135, 1063–1064 (1935).

  6. Circular letter from Royal Society to UK learned societies. Royal Society (12 April 1949).

  7. Csiszar, A. in Science Periodicals in Nineteenth-Century Britain: Constructing Scientific Communities (eds Dawson, G. et al.) Ch. 3 (The University of Chicago Press, 2020).

  8. Royal Society printed Council minutes. Vol. 6 Royal Society (18 February 1892).

  9. Royal Society printed Council minutes. Vol. 10 Royal Society (21 May 1914).

  10. Guide for the Preparation of Synopses (Royal Society, 1949).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research underpinning this essay was funded by the Arts & Humanities Research Council, AH/K001841. An earlier version of these thoughts appeared as A. Fyfe, ‘Where did the practice of ‘abstracts’ come from?’ A History of Scientific Journals website (8 July 2021); https://arts.st-andrews.ac.uk/philosophicaltransactions/where-did-the-practice-of-abstracts-come-from/#more-1444

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aileen Fyfe.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fyfe, A. The surprising history of abstracts. Nat Rev Phys 6, 464–465 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-024-00741-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-024-00741-0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing