Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Why a culture of brilliance is bad for physics

Nature Reviews Physics volume 6, pages 75–77 (2024)Cite this article

Subjects

Women and people of colour are underrepresented in physics in many parts of the world, to the detriment of the field. How do academics’ beliefs about the role of ‘brilliance’ in career success contribute to these representation gaps, and what can be done to address them?

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Women’s and African Americans’ representation among US PhDs across 30 fields (left), and within physics by career stage (right).

References

  1. Leslie, S. J. et al. Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science 347, 262–265 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bian, L., Leslie, S. J. & Cimpian, A. Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children’s interests. Science 355, 389–391 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bian, L., Leslie, S. J. & Cimpian, A. Evidence of bias against girls and women in contexts that emphasize intellectual ability. Am. Psychol. 73, 1139–1153 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hannak, A. et al. Field-specific ability beliefs as an explanation for gender differences in academics’ career trajectories: Evidence from public profiles on ORCID.org. J.Pers. Soc. Psychol. 125, 681–698 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Muradoglu, M. et al. Women—particularly underrepresented minority women—and early-career academics feel like impostors in fields that value brilliance. J. Educ. Psychol. 114, 1086–1100 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chestnut, E. K. & Markman, E. M. “Girls are as good as boys at math” implies that boys are probably better: A study of expressions of gender equality. Cogn. Sci. 42, 2229–2249 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Webb, D. J. & Paul, C. A. Attributing equity gaps to course structure in introductory physics. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 19, 020126 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Good, M., Maries, A. & Singh, C. Additional unexpected benefits of rewarding students for effective problem solving strategies: Supporting gender equity in physics. Phys. Educ. 57, 055005 (2022).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Vial, A. C. et al. An emphasis on brilliance fosters masculinity-contest cultures. Psychol. Sci. 33, 595–612 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jenifer, J. B. et al. “You need to be super smart to do well in math!” Young children’s field-specific ability beliefs. Dev. Sci. 27, e13429 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by funds from the US Institute of Education Sciences (Grant R305A200355) and the US National Science Foundation (Grant BCS-1733897) awarded to A. Cimpian; by a US National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (under Grant DGE-2234660) awarded to S. H. Arnold; and by a Predoctoral Interdisciplinary Research Training Fellowship (supported by the US Institute of Education Sciences through Grant R305B200010 to New York University) awarded to A. Poddar.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

    Melis Muradoglu

  2. New York University, New York, NY, USA

    Sophie H. Arnold, Aashna Poddar, Adam Stanaland, Duygu Yilmaz & Andrei Cimpian

Authors
  1. Melis Muradoglu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sophie H. Arnold
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Aashna Poddar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Adam Stanaland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Duygu Yilmaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Andrei Cimpian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Melis Muradoglu or Andrei Cimpian.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Muradoglu, M., Arnold, S.H., Poddar, A. et al. Why a culture of brilliance is bad for physics. Nat Rev Phys 6, 75–77 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-023-00685-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-023-00685-x

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing