Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

New directions in hypernuclear physics

Nature Reviews Physics volume 3, pages 803–813 (2021)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

A hypernucleus, a subatomic bound system with at least one hyperon, is a great test ground to investigate nuclear forces and general baryonic interactions with up, down and strange quarks. Hypernuclei have been extensively studied for almost seven decades in reactions involving cosmic rays and with accelerator beams. In recent years, experimental studies of hypernuclei have entered a new stage using energetic collisions of heavy-ion beams. However, these investigations have revealed two puzzling results related to the lightest three-body hypernuclear system, the so-called hypertriton, and the unexpected existence of a bound state of two neutrons with a Λ hyperon. Solving these puzzles will not only impact our understanding of the fundamental baryonic interactions with strange quarks but also of the nature of the deep interior of neutron stars. In this Perspective, we discuss approaches to solving these puzzles, including experiments with heavy-ion beams and the analysis of nuclear emulsions using state-of-the-art technologies. We summarize ongoing projects and experiments at various facilities worldwide and outline future perspectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The WASA-FRS hypernuclear experiment.
Fig. 2: Nuclear emulsion analysis.
Fig. 3: Upcoming hypernuclear experiments.

References

  1. Weber, F. Strangeness in neutron stars. J. Phys. G Nucl. Part. Phys. 27, 465–474 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Weber, F., Ho, A., Negreiros, R. P. & Rosenfield, P. Strangeness in neutron stars. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 16, 231–245 (2007).

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Demorest, P. B., Pennucci, T., Ransom, S. M., Roberts, M. S. E. & Hessels, J. W. T. A two-solar-mass neutron star measured using Shapiro delay. Nature 467, 1081–1083 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Antoniadis, J. et al. A massive pulsar in a compact relativistic binary. Science 340, 1233232 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barr, E. D. et al. A massive millisecond pulsar in an eccentric binary. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 465, 1711–1719 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yamamoto, Y., Furumoto, T., Yasutake, N. & Rijken, T. A. Hyperon mixing and universal many-body repulsion in neutron stars. Phys. Rev. C 90, 045805 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ekawa, H. et al. Observation of a Be double-Lambda hypernucleus in the J-PARC E07 experiment. Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2019, 021D02 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hayakawa, S. H. et al. Observation of coulomb-assisted nuclear bound state of Ξ−–14N system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 062501 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Takahashi, H. et al. Observation of a \({}_{\Lambda \Lambda }^{6}{\rm{He}}\) double hypernucleus. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 212502 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nakazawa, K. & Takahashi, H. Experimental study of double-Λ hypernuclei with nuclear emulsion. Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 185, 335–343 (2010).

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rappold, C. et al. Hypernuclear production cross section in the reaction of 6Li + 12C at 2 A GeV. Phys. Lett. B 747, 129–134 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. The STAR Collaboration Observation of an antimatter hypernucleus. Science 328, 58–62 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xu, Y. for the STAR Collaboration in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Hypernuclear and Strange Particle Physics (HYP2015) 021005 (2017).

  14. Adamczyk, L. et al. Measurement of the \({\,}_{\Lambda }^{3}{\rm{H}}\) lifetime in Au+Au collisions at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider. Phys. Rev. C 97, 054909 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen, J., Keane, D., Ma, Y.-G., Tang, A. & Xu, Z. Antinuclei in heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rep. 760, 1–39 (2018).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Adam, J. et al. \({\,}_{\Lambda }^{3}{\rm{H}}\) and \({\,}_{\bar{\Lambda }}^{3}\bar{{\rm{H}}}\) production in Pb–Pb collisions at \(\sqrt{{s}_{{\rm{NN}}}}\) = 2.76 TeV. Phys. Lett. B 754, 360–372 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Acharya, S. et al. \({\,}_{\Lambda }^{3}{\rm{H}}\) and \({\,}_{\bar{\Lambda }}^{3}\bar{{\rm{H}}}\) lifetime measurement in Pb–Pb collisions at \(\sqrt{{s}_{{\rm{NN}}}}\) = 5.02 TeV via two-body decay. Phys. Lett. B 797, 134905 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Adam, J. et al. Measurement of the mass difference and the binding energy of the hypertriton and antihypertriton. Nat. Phys. 16, 409–412 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rappold, C. et al. Search for evidence of \({\,}_{\Lambda }^{3}n\) by observing d + π− and t + π− final states in the reaction of 6Li+12C at 2A GeV. Phys. Rev. C 88, 041001 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Davis, D. H. 50 years of hypernuclear physics: I. The early experiments. Nucl. Phys. A 754, 3–13 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bohm, G. et al. A determination of the binding-energy values of light hypernuclei. Nucl. Phys. B 4, 511–526 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. JuriÄ, M. et al. A new determination of the binding-energy values of the light hypernuclei (A ≤ 15). Nucl. Phys. B 52, 1–30 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Prem, R. J. & Steinberg, P. H. Lifetimes of hypernuclei, ΛH3, ΛH4, ΛH5. Phys. Rev. 136, B1803–B1806 (1964).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Keyes, G. et al. New measurement of the ΛH3 lifetime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 20, 819–821 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Phillips, R. E. & Schneps, J. Lifetimes of light hyperfragments. II. Phys. Rev. 180, 1307–1318 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bohm, G. et al. On the lifetime of the \({}_{\Lambda }^{3}{\rm{H}}\) hypernucleus. Nucl. Phys. B 16, 46–52 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Keyes, G. et al. Properties of ΛH3. Phys. Rev. D 1, 66–77 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Keyes, G., Sacton, J., Wickens, J. & Block, M. A measurement of the lifetime of the \({}_{\Lambda }^{3}{\rm{H}}\) hypernucleus. Nucl. Phys. B 67, 269–283 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Particle Data Group et al.Review of particle physics. Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 083C01 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rappold, C. et al. Hypernuclear spectroscopy of products from 6Li projectiles on a carbon target at 2 AGeV. Nucl. Phys. A 913, 170–184 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Yu-Gang, M. (Anti)hypertriton lifetime puzzle. EPJ Web Conf. 117, 03003 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Perez-Obiol, A., Gazda, D., Friedman, E. & Gal, A. Revisiting the hypertriton lifetime puzzle. Phys. Lett. B 811, 135916 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hildenbrand, F. & Hammer, H.-W. Lifetime of the hypertriton. Phys. Rev. C 102, 064002 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hiyama, E. et al. Three-body structure of the nnΛ system with ΛN–ΣN coupling. Phys. Rev. C 89, 061302 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Gal, A. & Garcilazo, H. Is there a bound \({}_{\Lambda }^{3}{\rm{n}}\)? Phys. Lett. B 736, 93–97 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Garcilazo, H. & Valcarce, A. Nonexistence of a Λnn bound state. Phys. Rev. C 89, 057001 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. Schafer, M. et al. The continuum spectrum of hypernuclear trios. Phys. Lett. B 808, 135614 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ando, S.-I., Raha, U. & Oh, Y. Investigation of the nnΛ bound state in pionless effective theory. Phys. Rev. C 92, 024325 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. Hildenbrand, F. & Hammer, H.-W. Three-body hypernuclei in pionless effective field theory. Phys. Rev. C 100, 034002 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. Afnan, I. R. & Gibson, B. F. Resonances in the Λnn system. Phys. Rev. C 92, 054608 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. Tang, L. et al. Determining the unknown Λ-n interaction by investigating the Λnn Resonance. Approved proposal E12-17-003 by PAC at Jefferson Lab. https://www.jlab.org/exp_prog/proposals/17/PR12-17-003.pdf (2017).

  42. Bleser, S. et al. Has the neutral double hypernucleus \({}_{\Lambda \Lambda }^{4}{\rm{n}}\) been observed? Phys. Lett. B 790, 502–508 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Le, H., Haidenbauer, J., Meiner, U.-G. & Nogga, A. Implications of an increased λ-separation energy of the hypertriton. Phys. Lett. B 801, 135189 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Haidenbauer, J., Meißner, U.-G. & Nogga, A. Hyperon–nucleon interaction within chiral effective field theory revisited. Eur. Phys. J. A 56, 91 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. Geissel, H. et al. The GSI projectile fragment separator (FRS): a versatile magnetic system for relativistic heavy ions. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 70, 286–297 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. Bargholtz, C. et al. The WASA detector facility at CELSIUS. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 594, 339–350 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. Saito, T. R. et al. Studies of the d+π− signal and lifetime of the \({}_{\Lambda }^{3}{\rm{H}}\) and \({}_{\Lambda }^{4}{\rm{H}}\) hypernuclei by new spectroscopy techniques with FRS. Approved proposal S447 by GSI G-PAC (2017).

  48. Outa, H. et al. Mesonic and non-mesonic decay widths of \({}_{\Lambda }^{4}{\rm{H}}\) and \({}_{\Lambda }^{4}{\rm{He}}\). Nucl. Phys. A 639, 251c–260c (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Europe (FAIR). https://fair-center.eu.

  50. High Intensity Heavy-ion Accelerator Facility (HIAF). http://hiaf.impcas.ac.cn/hiaf_en/public/c/news.html.

  51. Imai, K., Nakazawa, K. & Tamura, H. J-PARC E07 experiment: Systematic study of double strangeness system with an emulsion-counter hybrid method. Proposal for Nuclear and Particle Physics Experiments at J-PARC (2006). http://j-parc.jp/researcher/Hadron/en/pac_0606/pdf/p07-Nakazawa.pdf.

  52. Aoki, S. et al. Nuclear capture at rest of Ξ− hyperons. Nucl. Phys. A 828, 191–232 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. Ahn, J. K. et al. Double-Λ hypernuclei observed in a hybrid emulsion experiment. Phys. Rev. C 88, 014003 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. & Hinton, G. Deep learning. Nature 521, 436–444 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S. & Sun, J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. Preprint at arXiv http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.03385 (2015).

  56. Yoshida, J. et al. CNN-based event classification of alpha-decay events in nuclear emulsion. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 989, 164930 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Goodfellow, I. J. et al. Generative adversarial networks. Preprint at arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.2661 (2014).

  58. Wang, T. et al. High-resolution image synthesis and semantic manipulation with conditional GANs. Preprint at arXiv http://arxiv.org/abs/1711.11585 (2017).

  59. He, K., Gkioxari, G., Dollár, P. & Girshick, R. B. Mask R-CNN. Preprint at arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.06870 (2017).

  60. Barkas, W. H. Nuclear Research Emulsions. Pure & Applied Physics Series 15-1 (Academic, 1963).

  61. Danysz, M. et al. The identification of a double hyperfragment. Nucl. Phys. 49, 121–132 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Dalitz, R. H. et al. The identified ΛΛ-hypernuclei and the predicted H-particle. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Sci. 426, 1–17 (1989).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  63. Aoki, S. et al. Direct observation of sequential weak decay of a double hypernucleus. Prog. Theor. Phys. 85, 1287–1298 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  64. Nakazawa, K. et al. The first evidence of a deeply bound state of Xi−–14N system. Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2015, 033D02 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  65. Ichikawa, A. et al. Production of twin Λ-hypernuclei from Ξ− hyperon capture at rest. Phys. Lett. B 500, 37–46 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  66. Yoshimoto, M. et al. First observation of a nuclear s-state of a Ξ hypernucleus, \({}_{\Xi }^{15}{\rm{C}}\). Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2021, 073D02 (2021).

  67. Yoshida, J., Nakazawa, K. & Umehara, K. New methods and technologies for double-lambda hypernucleus search in nuclear emulsion in J-PARC E07. https://doi.org/10.7566/JPSCP.1.013070 (2014).

  68. Yoshida, J. et al. A new scanning system for alpha decay events as calibration sources for range-energy relation in nuclear emulsion. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 847, 86–92 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  69. Yamamoto, T. O. et al. Observation of spin-dependent charge symmetry breaking in ΛN interaction: gamma-ray spectroscopy of \({}_{\Lambda }^{4}{\rm{He}}\). Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 222501 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Superconducting fragment separator (Super-FRS). https://fair-center.eu/en/for-users/experiments/nustar/super-frs.html.

  71. Rappold, C. & López-Fidalgo, J. Examination of experimental conditions for the production of proton-rich and neutron-rich hypernuclei. Phys. Rev. C 94, 044616 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  72. Saito, T. R., Ekawa, H. & Nakagawa, M. Novel method for producing very-neutron-rich hypernuclei via charge-exchange reactions with heavy ion projectiles. Eur. Phys. J. A 57, 159 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  73. Bass, S. et al. Microscopic models for ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 41, 255–369 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  74. Bleicher, M. et al. Relativistic hadron-hadron collisions in the ultra-relativistic quantum molecular dynamics model. J. Phys. G Nucl. Part. Phys. 25, 1859–1896 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  75. Yang, J. et al. High intensity heavy ion accelerator facility (hiaf) in China. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 317, 263–265 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  76. Kalantar-Nayestanaki, N. & Bruce, A. NUSTAR: NUclear STructure Astrophysics and Reactions at FAIR. Nucl. Phys. News 28, 5–11 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Danysz, M. & Pniewski, J. Delayed disintegration of a heavy nuclear fragment: I. Phil. Mag. 44, 348–350 (1953).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Hashimoto, O. & Tamura, H. Spectroscopy of Λ hypernuclei. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 57, 564–653 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  79. Saito, T. R. et al. Hypernuclei with stable heavy ion beam and RI-beam induced reactions at GSI (HypHI). Letter of intent submitted to GSI G-PAC (2005).

  80. Saito, T. R. et al. Phase 0 experiment of the HypHI project: Hypernuclear spectroscopy of \({}_{\Lambda }^{3}{\rm{H}}\), \({}_{\Lambda }^{4}{\rm{H}}\) and \({}_{\Lambda }^{5}{\rm{He}}\)He with a 6Li beam at 2 A GeV on a 12C target. Proposal approved by GSI G-PAC (2006).

Download references

Acknowledgements

Discussions presented for the WASA-FRS experiment here are based on the experiment S447, which is currently scheduled in 2022 at the FRS at the GSI Helmholtzzentrum fuer Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt (Germany) in the context of FAIR Phase 0. The authors thank the accelerator departments at GSI and IMP, the FRS department at GSI and the Experiment Electronics department at GSI for the technical support. The authors thank the J-PARC E07 collaboration for providing us with the nuclear emulsion data. The authors thank Luise Doersching-Steitz of GSI, Rita Krause of GSI, Yukiko Kurakata of RIKEN, Daniela Press of GSI, Miao Yang of IMP and Xiaohua Yuan of IMP for supporting the projects, including the administrative works. The authors also thank Risa Kobayashi of RIKEN and Yoko Tsuchii of Gifu University for their technical support in mining hypertriton events in the E07 nuclear emulsions. K.N., J.Y. and M.Y. acknowledge support by JSPS KAKENHI grant numbers JP23224006, JP16H02180, JP20H00155 and JP20J00682, and MEXT KAKENHI grant numbers JP24105002 (Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas 2404), JP18H05403 and JP19H05147 (Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas 6005). S.E. and C.R. are supported by the grant 2019-T1/TIC-13194 of the program ‘Atracción de Talento Investigador’ of the Community of Madrid.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. High Energy Nuclear Physics Laboratory, Cluster for Pioneering Research, RIKEN, Wako, Japan

    Takehiko R. Saito, Wenbou Dou, Hiroyuki Ekawa, Ayumi Kasagi, Enqiang Liu, Yue Ma, Abdul Muneem, Manami Nakagawa, Nami Saito, Yoshiki K. Tanaka, Junya Yoshida & He Wang

  2. GSI Helmholtz Center for Heavy Ion Research, Darmstadt, Germany

    Takehiko R. Saito, Vasyl Drozd, Shizu Minami & Christoph Scheidenberger

  3. School of Nuclear Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China

    Takehiko R. Saito & Yan He

  4. Department of Physics, Saitama University, Saitama, Japan

    Wenbou Dou

  5. Energy and Sustainability Research Institute Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands

    Vasyl Drozd, Nasser Kalantar-Nayestanaki & Myroslav Kavatsyuk

  6. Instituto de Estructura de la Materia, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid, Spain

    Samuel Escrig & Christophe Rappold

  7. Graduate School of Engineering, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan

    Ayumi Kasagi & Kazuma Nakazawa

  8. Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China

    Enqiang Liu & Xiaohong Zhou

  9. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    Enqiang Liu

  10. Faculty of Engineering Sciences, Ghulam Ishaq Khan Institute of Engineering Sciences and Technology, Topi, Pakistan

    Abdul Muneem

  11. Faculty of Education, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan

    Kazuma Nakazawa & Masahiro Yoshimoto

  12. Graduate School of Artificial Intelligence and Science, Rikkyo University, Tokyo, Japan

    Masato Taki

  13. Department of Physics, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan

    Junya Yoshida

Authors
  1. Takehiko R. Saito
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wenbou Dou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vasyl Drozd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hiroyuki Ekawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Samuel Escrig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yan He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Nasser Kalantar-Nayestanaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ayumi Kasagi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Myroslav Kavatsyuk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Enqiang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Yue Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Shizu Minami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Abdul Muneem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Manami Nakagawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Kazuma Nakazawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Christophe Rappold
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Nami Saito
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Christoph Scheidenberger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Masato Taki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Yoshiki K. Tanaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Junya Yoshida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Masahiro Yoshimoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  23. He Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  24. Xiaohong Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the manuscript. T.R.S., V.D., H.E., S.E., N.K.-N., A.K., M.K., E.L., S.M., A.M., M.N., C.R., N.S., C.S., M.T., Y.K.T., J.Y. and H.W. contributed to the WASA-FRS experiment at GSI and will contribute to future hypernuclear projects at FAIR. T.R.S., W.D., H.E., A.K., E.L., A.M., M.N., K.N., C.R., N.S., M.T., Y.K.T., J.Y., M.Y. and H.W. contributed to the development of the method to analyse the nuclear emulsion with machine learning. T.R.S., H.E., Y.H., E.L., Y.M., M.N., C.R., H.W. and X.Z. are working on the hypernuclear project at HIAF.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takehiko R. Saito.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information

Nature Reviews Physics thanks Yu-Gang Ma, Stefano Trogolo, Ed Hungerford and the other, anonymous, reviewer for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saito, T.R., Dou, W., Drozd, V. et al. New directions in hypernuclear physics. Nat Rev Phys 3, 803–813 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00371-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00371-w

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing