Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Women in physics


A Publisher Correction to this article was published on 28 May 2019

This article has been updated

The percentage of women in post-graduate physics positions has stalled just below 20%. The most precipitous drop in women’s representation occurs between high school and university; however, women at all career stages struggle with ongoing cultural burdens and obstacles.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Women remain under-represented in physics around the world at undergraduate, PhD and faculty levels.

Change history

  • 28 May 2019

    An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.


  1. Stoet, G. & Geary, D. C. The gender-equality paradox in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Psychol. Sci. 29, 581–593 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bian, L., Leslie, S. J. & Cimpian, A. Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children’s interests. Science 355, 389–391 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Diekman, A. B. et al. A goal congruity model of role entry, engagement, and exit: understanding communal goal processes in STEM gender gaps. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 21, 142–175 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Holman, L., Stuart-Fox, D. & Hauser, C. E. The gender gap in science: how long until women are equally represented? PLOS Biol. 16, e2004956 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dutt, K. et al. Gender differences in recommendation letters for postdoctoral fellowships in geoscience. Nat. Geosci. 9, 805–808 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Reuben, E., Sapienza, P. & Zingales, L. How stereotypes impair women’s careers in science. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 4403–4408 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cech, E. A. & Blair-Loy, M. The changing career trajectories of new parents in STEM. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 4182–4187 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Sexual Harassment of Women: Climate, Culture, and Consequences in Academic Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (The National Academies Press, 2018).

  9. Lock, R. M. & Hazari, Z. Discussing underrepresentation as a means to facilitating female students’ physics identity development. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 12, 020101 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Breda, T. et al. Can female role models reduce the gender gap in science? Evidence from classroom interventions in French high schools. HAL (2018).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramin Skibba.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Skibba, R. Women in physics. Nat Rev Phys 1, 298–300 (2019).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing