Abstract
The current race in quantum communication – endeavouring to establish a global quantum network – must account for special and general relativistic effects. The wellstudied general relativistic effects include Shapiro timedelay, gravitational lensing, and frame dragging which all are due to how a mass distribution alters geodesics. Here, we report how the curvature of spacetime geometry affects the propagation of information carriers along an arbitrary geodesic. An explicit expression for the distortion onto the carrier wavefunction in terms of the Riemann curvature is obtained. Furthermore, we investigate this distortion for anti de Sitter and Schwarzschild geometries. For instance, the spacetime curvature causes a 0.10 radian phaseshift for communication between Earth and the International Space Station on a monochromatic laser beam and quadrupole astigmatism; can cause a 12.2% crosstalk between structured modes traversing through the solar system. Our finding shows that this gravitational distortion is significant, and it needs to be either pre or postcorrected at the sender or receiver to retrieve the information.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Photons, electromagnetic waves, are widely used in classical and quantum communication since they do not possess electric charge or rest mass. However, a photon’s traits, e.g. group and phase velocity, wavelength, linear and optical angular momentum, are modified inside or during propagation through a linear or a nonlinear medium. These traits are governed by Maxwell’s equations, which are the relativistic quantum field theory of the U(1) gauge connection. Understanding how these optical properties are altered upon propagation is a key element for any optical communication network. In optical communication, the sender and the receiver, namely Alice and Bob, use one or several internal photonic degrees of freedom, such as wavelength, polarisation, transverse mode or timebins, to share information, including a ciphertext and the secret key to decrypt the ciphertext. The propagation, e.g. through fibre, air or underwater channels, causes these photonic degrees of freedom to be altered, and thus causes undesired errors on the shared information. Therefore, the alteration to those degrees of freedom for any communication channel needs to be considered and well examined. Sharing information with a longer range or with moving objects, e.g. satellites, airplanes, submersibles^{1,2,3,4,5}, requires the optical beam to not only traverse through a medium, but in a few cases, also in the fabric of the spacetime geometry, where general relativistic effects manifest^{6,7,8,9}. Effects associated to the change of the geodesic due to a mass distribution, such as Shapiro timedelay^{10}, gravitational lensing^{11} and frame dragging^{12}, are well studied and observed^{13,14,15,16}.
We explore the propagation of relativistic wavepackets along an arbitrary null geodesic in a general curved spacetime geometry, and show how the curvature of the spacetime geometry distorts the wavepacket as it travels along the null geodesic. Different methods are used to tackle this study. For instance, the fourdimensional KleinGordon equation is approximated to a simple twodimensional partial differential equation by ignoring all the multipolar modes^{17,18}. In particular, in derivation of Eq. (7) from Eq. (6) in ref. ^{17}, the second term on the lefthand side of Eq. (41) of ref. ^{19} has not been taken into account, therefore,^{17,18} cannot claim to reproduce all the effects of a curved spacetime geometry. In ref. ^{19}, all the multipolar ℓ modes are presented only at the level of the equations; however, the upper value of ℓ = 100 on the multipolar modes is considered to compute the solution. On the surface of the earth, a narrow beam with an initial width of 10 cm and a large value of Rayleigh range requires taking into account the contribution of multipolar modes up to at least ℓ = 10^{9}. So the solutions presented in ref. ^{19} do not take into consideration all the multipolar modes required to calculate the effects of the curvature at the vicinity of the Earth. Here, we present a computationally simple method to calculate the distortion by the curvature of any spacetime geometry on any localised wavepacket.
In flat spacetime geometry, the propagation of each polarisation of photon is isomorphic to the propagation of a massless scalar field. Based on our understanding of the Einstein equivalence principle, we expect that studying a massless scalar field theory also captures some features of a photon’s propagation in curved spacetime geometry. Therefore, in this study, we consider the propagation of a massless scalar in the bulk of the paper. In Supplementary Note 2, we prove that in the Lorentz gauge, each linear polarisation of the photon in a curved spacetime geometry gets corrected as if it were a massless scalar field. It is reported that the Riemann tensor quantum mechanically alters the wavepacket propagating along a geodesic. The alteration operators depend on the geodesic and components of the Riemann tensor on the geodesic. The alteration is calculated for examples including the spacetime geometry around the Earth and the Sun.
Results and discussion
We start by considering a relativistic massless scalar field ψ ≔ ψ(x^{μ}) that propagates in a curved spacetime geometry x^{μ} = (t, x^{i}) = (t, x, y, z) with an arbitrary Riemann curvature tensor R_{abcd}. The units are chosen such that the speed of light in vacuum and the reduced Planck constant are equal to one, i.e. c = 1 and ℏ = 1. Let us consider a localised wavefunction (information carrier) whose size is small compared to the curvature of the spacetime geometry. At the leading order, therefore, the carrier can be treated as a massless pointlike particle that travels along a null geodesic γ, see Fig. 1a. We choose the local Fermi coordinates^{20} along the geodesics in order to compute the quantum relativistic corrections. The metric’s components in the Fermi coordinates can be expanded in terms of the components of the Riemann tensor R_{abcd} and its covariant derivatives evaluated on the geodesic, see Fig. 1b,c. The expansion of the metric up to quadratic order in the transverse coordinates of the geodesic of a massless particle γ is given by^{21},
where \({x}^{\pm }=({x}^{3}\pm t)/\sqrt{2}\) represent the Dirac lightcone coordinates^{22} in the Fermi coordinates (x^{+} is always tangent to the null geodesic Fig. 1b), δ_{ab} is the Kronecker delta, \(\hat{\dot{\gamma }}\) is the tangent of the null geodesic and a, b ∈ {1, 2}, and \(({x}^{\bar{a}})=({x}^{},{x}^{a})\) and the curvature components are evaluated on γ. The treelevel action of a massless scalar field ψ in a general curved spacetime geometry is given by \(S[\psi ]=\frac{1}{2}\int d{x}^{4}\sqrt{g}{g}^{\mu \nu }{\partial }_{\mu }\psi {\partial }_{\nu }\psi \), where g is the determinant of the metric g_{μν}, and μ, ν ∈ {±, a}. Since the treelevel action is quadratic in terms of ψ, it is quantum mechanically exact, which can be verified by looking at its generating function, i.e. \(Z[J]=\int {{{\mathcal{D}}}}\psi {e}^{i(S[\psi ]+\int{d}^{4}x\sqrt{\det g}J\psi )}/\int {{{\mathcal{D}}}}\psi {e}^{iS[\psi ]}\;\;{{{\mathcal{D}}}}\psi\) represents the integration overall field configurations and J is the source field. Its exact effective action, as defined by the Legendre transformation of \({{{\mathrm{ln}}}}\,Z\), coincides with the treelevel action, i.e. Γ[ψ_{c}] = S[ψ_{c}]. For a general action, φ_{c} resembles a "classical” field whose action is given by Γ[ψ_{c}], while Γ[ψ_{c}] encapsulates all the quantum loop corrections. The exact effective action includes both the classical and quantum effects. The classical effects are those that can be reproduced by motion of a pointlike particle along the geodesic; the rest are quantum. The effective action of a free photon propagating in curved spacetime geometry coincides to the treelevel action, therefore, we omit the subscript c.
The massless scalar (quantum) field ψ obeys the (covariant) wave equation, \(\square \psi ={(g)}^{\frac{1}{2}}{\partial }_{\mu }{(g)}^{\frac{1}{2}}{g}^{\mu \nu }{\partial }_{\nu }\psi =0\). In the Fermi coordinates, g_{μν} can be viewed as a perturbation to the Minkowski metric, inducing expansion series for the inverse and determinant of the metric: g^{μν} = η^{μν} + εδ g^{μν} + O(ε^{2}) and \({{{\mathrm{ln}}}}\,(\sqrt{\det g})=\varepsilon \delta \ g+O({\varepsilon }^{2})\). ε is the systematic perturbation parameter introduced to keep track of the perturbation series, which means that all the components of the Riemann tensor in Eq. (1) are multiplied with ε, and ε is treated as an infinitesimal parameter. At the end of the computation, we set ε = 1. This technique helps us to systematically perform perturbations for small curvatures. Utilising the perturbation gives,
where \({\square }^{(0)}={\eta }^{\mu \nu }{\partial }_{\mu }{\partial }_{\nu }=2{\partial }_{}{\partial }_{+}+{\nabla }_{\ \ \perp }^{2}\) is the d’Alembert operator in the flat spacetime geometry, and \({\nabla }_{\ \ \perp }^{2}={\partial }_{1}^{2}+{\partial }_{2}^{2}\). The perturbative nature of Eq. (2) seeks for a series expansion, ψ = ψ^{(0)} + εψ^{(1)} + O(ε^{2}). Here, ψ^{(0)} satisfies the scalar wave equation in the flat spacetime geometry □^{(0)}ψ^{(0)} = 0, and the perturbed term to the wavefunction, ψ^{(1)}, yields,
We assume the Fourier expansion in terms of x^{−} variable, \({\psi }^{(0)}=\int \ d\omega {f}_{\omega }^{(0)}({x}^{+},{x}^{a}){e}^{i\omega {x}^{}}\), where \({f}_{\omega }^{(0)}\) satisfies the paraxial equation \(\left(2i\omega {\partial }_{+}+{\nabla }_{\ \ \perp }^{2}\right){f}_{\omega }^{(0)}=0\). This implies that the solutions, given by the paraxial approximation in optics^{23,24}, are exact. The paraxial equation is isomorphic to the Schrödinger equation, and its solutions (the transverse and longitudinal parts) can be expressed in the form of LaguerreGauss (LG) modes (with an azimuthally symmetric intensity profile) or HermiteGaussian (HG) wavepackets^{25}. We consider a wavepacket wherein the field is slowly varying, and assume that the metric does not significantly change inside the wavepacket. Therefore, all derivatives of ∂_{μ}ψ^{(0)}, except ∂_{−}ψ^{(0)}, are negligible, and the leading term in the right hand side of Eq. (3) is ∂_{−}(δ g^{−−}∂_{−}ψ), where \(\delta \ {g}^{}={g}_{++}^{(1)}={R}_{+\bar{a}+\bar{b}}{x}^{\bar{a}}{x}^{\bar{b}}\). Therefore, Eq. (3) reduces to,
Here, \({\psi }^{(1)}=\int d\omega {f}_{\omega }^{(1)}({x}^{+},{x}^{a}){e}^{i\omega {x}^{}}\) with \({f}_{\omega }^{(1)}\) being the correction to the structure function for the frequency of ω. We have found the solutions to Eq. (4)—see the Supplementary Note 1 for more detail on the derivation. The solution is,
where c_{p,ℓ,n}(ω) are defined based on the initial and boundary conditions. The operators, \({{{{\mathcal{O}}}}}^{\omega }\), \({{{{\mathcal{Q}}}}}_{U}^{\omega }\) and \({{{{\mathcal{Q}}}}}_{N}^{\omega }\) encodes how the curvature of the spacetime geometry distorts the wavepacket. They are given by,
where \({{{{\mathcal{G}}}}}_{ab}\), \({\tilde{{{{\mathcal{G}}}}}}_{ab}\) and \({\tilde{\tilde{{{{\mathcal{G}}}}}}}_{ab}\) are integrals of the components of the Riemann tensor \({R}_{+\bar{a}+\bar{b}}\) evaluated on the geodesic—see Supplementary Note 1:
where τ is the affine parameter on the geodesic. The distortions provided by Eq. (5) is the solution to the exact quantum effective action and cannot be reproduced by motion of a pointlike particle along a geodesic. They do not exist in flat spactime geometry, so they manifest a set of quantum effects in curved spacetime geometry. A similar approach can be used to find the wavefunction of a massive scalar particle. The physical degrees of U(1) gauge fields get corrected as if they were scalar fields, see Supplementary Note 2 and Supplementary Note 3. Supplementary Note 4 presents the operators in the Hilbert space that corresponds to these corrections. The following subsections show how these operators distort the physical information encoded in wavepackets traveling along couple of examples of null geodesics in the Solar system and around the Earth.
We now study the distortion operators in a couple of spacetime geometries, including de Sitter and Schwarzschild spacetime geometries. We first study the de Sitter and anti de Sitter spacetime geometries because their symmetry allows one to immediately write down the components of the Riemann tensor in Fermi coordinates evaluated on the geodesic.
de Sitter and anti de Sitter spacetime geometries
The de Sitter and anti de Sitter spacetimes are maximally symmetric and the Riemann tensor at any given event in the spacetime in any coordinates, including the Fermi coordinates, is given by \({R}_{\mu \nu \mu ^{\prime} \nu ^{\prime} }={{\Lambda }}({g}_{\mu \mu ^{\prime} }{g}_{\nu \nu ^{\prime} }{g}_{\mu \nu ^{\prime} }{g}_{\nu \mu ^{\prime} })\). The value of Λ determines different geometries: Λ > 0 represents the de Sitter spacetime geometry; Λ < 0 represents the anti de Sitter spacetime geometry; and Λ = 0 is the Minkowki spacetime geometry. R_{+−+−} = Λ is the only nonzero component for \({R}_{+\bar{a}+\bar{b}}\) evaluated on the geodesic, and thus the correction operators, Eq. (5) are,
Let us consider a Gaussian wavepacket with normal distribution for ω around ω_{0} with the width of σ, i.e. \({\psi }_{{{\mbox{Alice}}}}={f}^{(0)}({x}^{+},{x}^{1},{x}^{2}){e}^{i{\omega }_{0}{x}^{}}{e}^{\frac{{(\sigma {x}^{})}^{2}}{2}}\). The validity of the perturbative solution demands that \( {{\Lambda }} \ll {\omega }_{0}^{2}\), ∣Λ∣ ≪ σ^{2} and σ ≪ ω_{0}. The wavepacket after the propagation is \({\psi }_{{{\mbox{Bob}}}}\simeq (1+\varepsilon {{{{\mathcal{Q}}}}}_{U}^{{\omega }_{0}}+\varepsilon {{{{\mathcal{Q}}}}}_{N}^{{\omega }_{0}}){e}^{i{\omega }_{0}{x}^{}}\ {f}^{(0)}{e}^{\frac{{({x}^{})}^{2}{\sigma }^{2}}{2}}\).
\({{{{\mathcal{Q}}}}}_{N}^{{\omega }_{0}}\) and \({{{{\mathcal{Q}}}}}_{U}^{{\omega }_{0}}\) change the wavepacket amplitude and phase, respectively. The maximum of \( {{{{\mathcal{Q}}}}}_{N}^{{\omega }_{0}}{\psi }_{{{\mbox{Alice}}}} \) occurs at x^{−} = ±1/σ. Requiring it to be smaller than 1 yields T < τ_{A} where \({\tau }_{A}=(\sigma \sqrt{e})/ {{\Lambda }} \). τ_{A} is the maximum time that the wavepacket feels the curvature of the spacetime geometry and keeps its amplitude intact. \({{{{\mathcal{Q}}}}}_{U}^{{\omega }_{0}}\) alters the phase of the wavepacket. The maximum of \( {{{{\mathcal{Q}}}}}_{U}^{{\omega }_{0}}{\psi }_{{{\mbox{Alice}}}} \) occurs at \({x}^{}={\pm}\!\sqrt{2}/\sigma \). Requiring it to be smaller than 1 results in T < τ_{φ} where \({\tau }_{\varphi }=(\sigma \ {\tau }_{A}\ \sqrt{e})/(2{\omega }_{0})\). τ_{φ} is the maximum time that a wavepacket can feel the curvature of the spacetime geometry and keep its phase intact. For T > τ_{φ}, information about phase is lost at perturbation. This may point to a “gravitational decoherence”, and its possible consequence on anti de Sitter/conformal field theory correspondence^{26} demands attention. τ_{A} represents the amount of time of interaction with the curvature that the wavepacket can keep its amplitude intact. We observe that τ_{φ} ≪ τ_{A}. So the phase changes sooner than the change in the amplitude.
Schwarzschild spacetime geometry
We choose the standard spherical coordinates r, θ, φ where geodesics are extrema of,
and m = 2G M_{•} is the Schwarzschild radius, M_{•} is the mass of the blackhole and G is the gravitational constant—the units are such that m = 1. The components of the Riemann tensor in the Fermi coordinates adapted to a general null geodesic of Schwarzschild spacetime geometry are derived in the Supplementary Note 5. Figure 2a shows several null geodesics that go very close to a blackhole. We first consider that the wavepacket propagates along the radial direction, Fig. 2b, where the only nonzero components of the Riemann tensor is R_{+−+−} = −1/r^{3}. This is the same component that appeared in the de Sitter spacetime geometry. The radial geodesic has l = 0, and its correction operators are \({{{{\mathcal{O}}}}}^{\omega }=0\), \({{{{\mathcal{Q}}}}}_{U}^{\omega }=\frac{i}{2\omega }\left(1\frac{{\left(\omega {x}^{}\right)}^{2}}{2}\right)\left(\frac{1}{{r}_{a}^{2}}\frac{1}{{r}^{2}}\right)\), and \({{{{\mathcal{Q}}}}}_{N}^{\omega }=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{1}{{r}_{a}^{2}}\frac{1}{{r}^{2}}\right){x}^{}\), where Alice is located at r_{a}. These correction terms do not contain derivatives of the spatial transverse coordinates. Thus, the Riemann tensor does not affect the spatial transverse profile of the wavepacket. This is due to the symmetry, as the radial geodesic inherits the static and spherical symmetry of the background. Figure 3a shows the amplitude and phase of a Gaussian timebin signal. Figure 3b depicts the alternations in the amplitude and the phase:
where r_{b} is the location of Bob. The maximum alteration to the amplitude and phase of the Gaussian wavepacket occur at x^{−} = ±1/σ and \({x}^{}={\pm}\!\sqrt{2}/\sigma \), respectively. For a Gaussian wavepacket that propagates radially close to the Earth, the maximum alteration to the amplitude and phase are, respectively, \( \delta {{{{\mathcal{A}}}}}_{\max .} =\frac{1}{2\sigma }\left(\frac{1}{{r}_{a}^{2}}\frac{1}{{r}_{b}^{2}}\right)\) and \(\delta {\chi }_{\max .}=\frac{{\omega }_{0}\ {m}_{\oplus }}{2{\sigma }^{2}}\left(\frac{1}{{r}_{a}^{2}}\frac{1}{{r}_{b}^{2}}\right)\), where m_{⊕} is the Schwarzschild radius of Earth.
For ν_{0} = 456 THz and Δν = 1 kHz, \(\delta {\chi }_{\max .}=0.10\) rad. Supplementary Note 8 provides further details on choosing these values.
As a final example, we examine the weak regime of gravity when the beam possesses welldefined transverse modes—see Fig. 2a. The wavepacket carrying a welldefined transverse mode traverses through space and reaches to the minimum distance of l to the central mass—here, we assume l is large. We now consider a specific wavepacket, a HermiteGauss transverse mode \({f}_{\omega ,p,\ell ,q}^{(0)}({x}^{},{x}^{+},{x}^{1},{x}^{2})={e}^{i{\omega }_{0}{x}^{}}{e}^{\frac{{(\sigma {x}^{})}^{2}}{2}}\ {{{\mbox{HG}}}}_{m,n}({x}^{+},{x}^{1},{x}^{2})\)—HermiteGauss modes are used to extend the communication alphabet beyond bits, i.e. 0 and 1^{27}. The longitudinal and frequency distributions are assumed to be Gaussian. When σ is large, the dominant correction operator is calculated to be:
where \(x=\sqrt{2}{x}_{1}/w({x}^{+})\) and \(y=\sqrt{2}{x}_{2}/w({x}^{+})\) are dimensionless coordinates, \(w({x}^{+})={w}_{0}\sqrt{1+{\left(\frac{{x}^{+}}{{z}_{R}}\right)}^{2}}\) is the beam radius, \({z}_{R}=\frac{1}{2}{\omega }_{0}{w}_{0}^{2}\) is the Rayleigh range, a = r_{a}/l is a scaling parameter, w_{0} is the beam radius at Alice’s position—see Supplementary Note 6 for more details. This operator contains coordinate parameters x and y, and thus, alters both the amplitude and phase of the transverse modes upon propagation. The correction for the solar system, when Alice and Bob are at the mean EarthSun distance from the Sun and the wavepacket passes at l = 2R_{⊙}, and for z_{R} = 2.8 km × a^{2} = 1.34 × 10^{9}m, remains perturbative and is given by \(\varepsilon {\psi }^{(1)}({x}^{\mu })=i\ 0.10\ \left({x}^{2}{y}^{2}\right){\psi }_{{{\mbox{Alice}}}}({x}^{\mu }){ }_{{x}^{+} = T}\).
The amplitude and phase of the mode ψ^{(0)}(x^{μ}) and the correction εψ^{(1)}(x^{μ}) for a few HermiteGaussian modes are shown in Fig. 4. As seen, these alterations on the modes are considerable. For instance, it causes up to 12.2% crosstalk between HG_{0,3} and HG_{0,1} modes. The crosstalk between mode \({{{\mathcal{M}}}}\) and mode \({{{\mathcal{N}}}}\) is given by \({\left\left\langle {{{\mathcal{N}}}} {{{\mathcal{M}}}}\right\rangle \right}^{2}\). Therefore, these perturbative alterations need to be accounted for when information is encrypted in the spatial modes. The action of curved spacetime geometry on the wavepacket is linear. Therefore, a target beam that does not possess the information can be used as a reference to monitor the distortion of the information carrier, and an active system can be employed for compensating the distortion in realtime—in conjunction, results in retrieving the original information. Moreover, whenever ε ≃ 1, the higherorder terms of correction need to be considered. For instance, for z_{R} < 28 km × a^{2}, the correction becomes larger than 1 and we need to take into account higher ε terms. Taking into account all the corrections is tantamount to knowing the Riemann tensor in whole of the spacetime geometry, a piece of knowledge which is not attainable. Thus, we tend to argue that once the perturbation breaks, in addition to known wellstudied gravitational decoherence^{28,29,30,31,32}, a decoherence occurs. We observe that, in addition to the known decoherence of a bipartite entangled system when each particle traverses through a different gravitational field gradient^{32,33}, a coherent beam decoheres when different segments of the spatial spread of the wave experience different tidal gravitational field gradients. The phenomenon we are reporting also occurs for geodesics passing very close to the event horizon—see Supplementary Note 7.
Finally, it is noteworthy that photon pairs \({\left\psi \right\rangle }_{{{\mbox{entangled}}}}\), e.g. entangled in spatial, frequency or temporal modes, would be affected by the curved spacetime geometry whenever they are shared between two parties, namely Alice and Bob. The final state of the entangled photon, indeed, is given by applying the nonlocal operators \({{{\mathcal{U}}}}=\left(1+\varepsilon ({{{\mathcal{O}}}}+{{{{\mathcal{Q}}}}}_{U}+{{{{\mathcal{Q}}}}}_{N})\right)\) onto the entangled states, \(\left({{{{\mathcal{U}}}}}_{A}\otimes {{{{\mathcal{U}}}}}_{B}\right){\left\psi \right\rangle }_{{{\mbox{entangled}}}}\)—here, \({{{{\mathcal{U}}}}}_{A}\) and \({{{{\mathcal{U}}}}}_{B}\) are associated with the correction operators at Alice and Bob’s places, respectively.
Conclusion
We have presented how the curvature of the spacetime geometry affects the propagation of an arbitrary wavepacket along a general geodesic in a general curved spacetime geometry. The effect is beyond classical general relativity, residing in the same category as Hawking radiation^{34}. A set of linear operators are presented that encode the effect of the curvature. The corrections to the information carrier wavepacket are investigated in cases of de Sitter (anti de Sitter) and Schwarzschild spacetime geometries. It has been shown that the corrections accumulate overtime and distort the wavepacket. The gravitational distortion, therefore, needs to be accounted for in quantum communication performed over long distances in a curved spacetime geometry.
Data availability
The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its supplementary information file.
References
Ursin, R. et al. Entanglementbased quantum communication over 144 km. Nat. Phys. 3, 481–486 (2007).
Yin, J. et al. Satellitebased entanglement distribution over 1200 kilometers. Science 356, 1140–1144 (2017).
Yin, J. et al. Satellitetoground entanglementbased quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 200501 (2017).
Wengerowsky, S. et al. Passively stable distribution of polarisation entanglement over 192 km of deployed optical fibre. Quantum Inf. 6, 5 (2020).
Hufnagel, F. et al. Investigation of underwater quantum channels in a 30 meter flume tank using structured photons. N. J. Phys. 22, 093074 (2020).
Einstein, A. Über den einfluß der schwerkraft auf die ausbreitung des lichtes. Ann. der Phys. 340, 898–908 (1911).
Pound, R. V. & Rebka, G. A. Apparent weight of photons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 4, 337–341 (1960).
Chou, C.W., Hume, D. B., Rosenband, T. & Wineland, D. J. Optical clocks and relativity. Science 329, 1630–1633 (2010).
Ashby, N. Relativity in the global positioning system. Living Rev. Relativ. 6, 1 (2003).
Shapiro, I. I. et al. Fourth test of general relativity: preliminary results. Phys. Rev. Lett. 20, 1265–1269 (1968).
Perlick, V. Gravitational lensing from a spacetime perspective. Living Rev. Relativ. 7, 9 (2004).
Everitt, C. et al. Gravity probe B: final results of a space experiment to test general relativity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 221101 (2011).
Will, C. The confrontation between general relativity and experiment. Living Rev. Relativ. 17, 4 (2011).
Liu, T., Wu, S. & Cao, S. The influence of the Earth’s curved spacetime on Gaussian quantum coherence. Laser Phys. Lett. 16, 095201 (2019).
Kish, S. P. & Ralph, T. C. Quantum metrology in the Kerr metric. Phys. Rev. D. 99, 124015 (2019).
Pierini, R. Effects of gravity on continuousvariable quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. D. 98, 125007 (2018).
Bruschi, D. E., Ralph, T., Fuentes, I., Jennewein, T. & Razavi, M. Spacetime effects on satellitebased quantum communications. Phys. Rev. D. 90, 045041 (2014).
Bruschi, D. E., Datta, A., Ursin, R., Ralph, T. C. & Fuentes, I. Quantum estimation of the Schwarzschild spacetime parameters of the Earth. Phys. Rev. D. 90, 124001 (2014).
Jonsson, R. H., Aruquipa, D. Q., Casals, M., Kempf, A. & MartínMartínez, E. Communication through quantum fields near a black hole. Phys. Rev. D. 101, 125005 (2020).
Fermi, E. Sopra i fenomeni che avvengono in vinicinanza di una linea oraria. Atti R. Accad. Lincei Rend. Cl. Sci. Fis. Mat. Nat. 31, 21–51 (1922).
Blau, M., Frank, D. & Weiss, S. Fermi coordinates and Penrose limits. Classical Quantum Gravity 23, 3993–4010 (2006).
Dirac, P. A. M. Forms of relativistic dynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 21, 392–399 (1949).
Siegman, A. E. Lasers university science books. Mill. Val., CA 37, 462–466 (1986).
BialynickiBirula, I. & BialynickaBirula, Z. Beams of electromagnetic radiation carrying angular momentum: the riemann–silberstein vector and the classical–quantum correspondence. Opt. Commun. 264, 342–351 (2006).
Bliokh, K. Y., Bliokh, Y. P., Savel’Ev, S. & Nori, F. Semiclassical dynamics of electron wavepacket states with phase vortices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 190404 (2007).
Maldacena, J. M. The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38, 1113–1133 (1999).
Krenn, M. et al. Communication with spatially modulated light through turbulent air across Vienna. N. J. Phys. 16, 113028 (2014).
Pang, B. H., Chen, Y. & Khalili, F. Y. Universal decoherence under gravity: a perspective through the equivalence principle. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 090401 (2016).
Stefanov, V., Siutsou, I. & Mogilevtsev, D. Gravitational dephasing in spontaneous emission of atomic ensembles in timed Dicke states. Phys. Rev. D. 101, 044042 (2020).
Bassi, A., Großardt, A. & Ulbricht, H. Gravitational decoherence. Classical Quantum Gravity 34, 193002 (2017).
Penrose, R. On gravity’s role in quantum state reduction. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 28, 581–600 (1996).
Joshi, S. K. et al. [Space QUEST topical Team], Space QUEST mission proposal: experimentally testing decoherence due to gravity. N. J. Phys. 20, 063016 (2018).
Ralph, T. C., Milburn, G. J. & Downes, T. Quantum connectivity of spacetime and gravitationally induced decorrelation of entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 79, 022121 (2009).
Hawking, S. W. Black hole explosions? Nature 248, 30–31 (1974).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the High Throughput and Secure Networks Challenge Program at the National Research Council of Canada, the Canada Research Chairs (CRC) and Canada First Research Excellence Fund (CFREF) Program, and Joint Centre for Extreme Photonics (JCEP). We would like to thank Alicia Sit, Benjamin Sussman, Khabat Heshami, Thomas Jennewein, Christoph Simon, Mathias Blau, Ida Zadeh and Loriano Bonora for fruitful discussions and thoughtful feedback, and Haorong Wu for the email correspondence. Q.E. would like to thank Fernando Quevedo and Atish Dabholkar for the nice hospitality in ICTP where part of the work was conducted.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Q.E. and E.K. conceived the idea and developed the theoretical framework. E.C. checked and confirmed the computation. All authors contributed to the manuscript preparation.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Peer review information Communications Physics thanks Siddarth Joshi and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Exirifard, Q., Culf, E. & Karimi, E. Towards communication in a curved spacetime geometry. Commun Phys 4, 171 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005021006718
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005021006718
This article is cited by

Tunning the tilt of the Dirac cone by atomic manipulations in 8Pmmn borophene
Communications Physics (2023)

Semiquantum secure direct communication in the curved spacetime
Quantum Information Processing (2021)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.