Abstract
Ultrafast ionization of atoms or molecules by intense laser pulses creates extremely nonstationary ionic states. This process triggers attosecond correlated electronhole dynamics and subsequent ultrafast nonequilibrium evolution of matters. Here we investigate the interwoven dynamic evolutions of neutral nitrogen molecules together with nitrogen ions created through transient tunnel ionization in an intense laser field. Based on the proposed theoretical frame, it is found that nitrogen molecular ions are primarily populated in the electronically excited states, rather than staying in the ground state as predicted by the wellknown tunneling theory. The unexpected result is attributed to subcycle switchon of timedependent polarization by transient ionization and dynamic Stark shift mediated nearresonant multiphoton transitions. These findings corroborate the mechanism of nitrogen molecular ion lasing and are likely to be universal. The present work opens a route to explore the important role of transient ionization injection in strongfield induced nonequilibrium dynamics.
Introduction
The fundamental process of strongfield ionization of atoms by intense ultrashort laser pulses occurs at attosecond timescale^{1,2,3} and lasts for pulse lengths in femtoseconds. The temporal confined strong field ionization (SFI) creates broad bandwidth nonstationary ionic states along with the launching of attosecond electron wavepacket forming the foundation of attosecond physics^{4,5,6,7,8}. One of the key problem is how the coherence of the ionic states affect the subsequent ultrafast nonequilibrium evolution ranging from charge migration in molecules^{9}, electron transport in condense matter^{10} to ultrafast laser processing of materials^{11}. It is particular intriguing to question whether the further interaction of the ions with lasers can be considered independently by assuming the prior ionization is completed?
Recent experiments indicate that the interplay of subcycle SFI and the followed ionlaser coupling is indispensable for nitrogen molecular ion lasing^{12,13,14,15,16}, which suggests the new possibility to manipulate the ion coherence upon its creation toward ionbased quantum optics. While SFI itself can be described well by the celebrated Keldysh tunneling theory^{17}, a complete model treating both ionization of neutrals and laserion couplings on the equal footing is still lacking. Theoretically, dealing with bounded multielectron problem is already a difficult task, it is even challenging for open quantum manybody systems when ionization is involved. Exact timedependent multilelectron theories are limited to two electrons cases^{18} or struggling with ionizationinduced derivative discontinuities in densityfunctionals^{19}. A lot of theoretical works have devoted to the coherent ionic evolution in a multichannel formalism^{20,21,22,23,24} but the ionlaser coupling within the ionization process remains elusive.
Considering the ionization of nitrogen molecules by intense laser pulses. As illustrated in Fig. 1, ionization creates the ion in three possible electronic states at the moment t_{i} by releasing the electron, the remaining linearly polarized laser field will further induce coherence and population transfer among the electronic and vibrational states with the couplings depending on the geometry of the molecular ion. According to the tunneling ionization theory^{17,25}, the population on the excited ionic states is expected to be much less than that on the ionic ground state. However, due to the continuous presence of the laser field, the ions created by SFI will be polarized by the laser field^{26} causing the electron to oscillate back and forth between electronic states.
In the present work, by treating nitrogen molecules as an open quantum system, we systematically investigate the role of transient injection of ions by SFI on ultrafast population redistribution of ionic states. As we will demonstrate, the subcycle turnon of the polarization of the ion upon its creation breaks the timereversal symmetry and it is thus possible to enhance the population on the higher excited states. Furthermore, in the case of resonance, the population on the excited states can also be greatly increased by multiphoton couplings mediated by dynamic Stark shift due to the instantaneous polarization. The ultrafast population redistribution of electronic states of molecular ions assisted by transient ionization might be a universal process for other molecular ionization from multiple orbitals and bond breaking and thus SFI can serve as an intrinsic attosecond probe to the subcycle ionic coherence. Our finding sheds more light on the SFIcoupling mechanism and provides crucial implications for further research on coherent emissions from molecular ions.
Results
Population inversion and vibrational redistribution
We now present our results, which are obtained by solving the ionizationcoupling model in the methods section. The details of calculation can be found in Supplementary Notes 1 and 2. We first discuss the nitrogen molecule whose axis is aligned to be 45° with respect to the pump laser polarization and therefore both the transitions of XA, XB are permitted. The rotational degree of freedom is assumed to be frozen in the present work. The solid curves in Fig. 2a shows the population evolution of the three electronic states of N\({}_{2}^{+}\) in the pump laser field by solving ionizationcoupling equation. It can be clearly seen that the final populations on the states A and B are prominently increased while that on the state X is greatly decreased in comparison to the case that only ionization is considered (the dashed curves in Fig. 2a). It can be seen that with the help of the transient injection the population between the states B and X is thus inverted. This is striking in view of that other processes, e.g, shakeup^{27,28} or recollision^{29,30} are unlikely to produce ionic population inversion.
The vibrational stateresolved distributions for each electronic state are respectively displayed in Fig. 2b–d. As can be seen, for the electronic state X, the ionization itself mainly populates the vibrational states v = 0, 1 because of the relatively larger Franck–Condon factors of the two states^{31}. However, when the coupling is incorporated, the vibrational population on the state v = 0 is largely reduced while higher vibrational states are more populated. It can be attributed to vibrational Ramanlike processes when a strong coherent coupling is produced between the states X and A. As a consequence of the X state population reduction, almost all the vibrational population on the state A are efficiently enhanced due to onephoton XA resonant transition. Remarkably, the vibrationalstate population on the state B (especially for v = 0) are considerably increased as well although the laser frequency is far off from XB resonant energy. Note that the vibrational energy gap between the states A(v = 0–4) and X(v = 0) spans from 1.12 to 2.06 eV and the driving laser photon energy ranges from 1.38 to 1.77 eV (700–900 nm). For the excited state B(v = 0–4), the vibrational energy differences with respect to the ground state X(v = 0) are in the range of 3.17–4.37 eV. The population transfer from the state X(v = 0) is only accessible to high vibrational states B(v = 3, 4) through a direct threephoton coupling.
Subcycle control of laserion coupling via transient ionization injection
In order to better understand the observed population enhancement of the lower vibrational states (i.e., v = 0, 1, 2) of the state B, we fixed nitrogen molecular axis to be parallel to the laser polarization, by which the AX coupling is avoided. In the following, we mainly focus on the B (v = 0) state because the manipulation of its population is critical to air lasing at 391 nm^{12,14,15,32,33,34,35}.
Figure 3a shows the evolution of the vibrational population of the ionic states B(v = 0) and X(v = 0) for the parallel alignment case. Again, the population on the state B(v = 0) is apparently promoted with the aid of simultaneous ionization and coupling. To investigate the influence brought by ionization on the coupling between B(v = 0) and X(v = 0), we first consider the ionization injection at the peak laser intensity and then follow the evolution of the ions in the second half of the laser field \(E(t)=f(t)\cos (\omega t+\phi )\) with different phase ϕ. The corresponding laser fields for ϕ = 0, π∕4, π∕2 are respectively depicted in the top portion of the Fig. 3b. The injection is all populated on the ground state X of N\({}_{2}^{+}\), i.e., \({\rho }_{XX}^{+}(v=0)=1\). Figure 3b plots the final population of the state B(v = 0) as a function of the initial phase ϕ for the pump wavelength 800 nm. Interestingly, the obtained population on the state B(v = 0) is strongly modulated with a period of π and the maximum value is achieved at ϕ = 0. This explains that the yield population calculated in^{13} who chose ϕ = π∕2 is less than that calculated in^{12} who chose ϕ = 0 using their threestate coupling model.
We now consider how the coupling varies with the field profile assuming the ionization injection occurs at the peak field of each optical cycle (corresponding to fixed ϕ = 0). The population on the B(v = 0) and X(v = 0) states of N\({}_{2}^{+}\) after the laserion coupling are shown in Fig. 3c as a function of the instant of transient ionization injection. The yield population on the state B(v = 0) shows a nearly Gaussian dependence on the moments of ionization injection following the intensity profile of the pumping laser, as depicted by the black squares Fig. 3c. The stronger of transient electric fields at the injection of the groundstate ions, the more population on the state B(v = 0) and reversely the less population on the state X(v = 0) are found after the pulse is finished.
Multiphoton transition mediated by dynamic Stark shift
Further enhancement of the population on the state B(v = 0) can be achieved by resonant transitions from X(v = 0). Since this process is sensitive to the central wavelength of laser pulses, we calculated the population dependence on the driving laser frequency by solving ionizationcoupling equation. As shown in Fig. 4a, a threephoton resonant peak for B(v = 0) appears at the wavelength of 900 nm, which deviates from the fieldfree threephoton resonant wavelength (1173 nm). Additional resonant peak around 1560 nm belongs to fivephoton resonance. Figure 4b shows the corresponding frequencies of the two resonant peaks as a function of the peak intensity of the driving laser field. Both threephoton and fivephoton resonant peaks exhibit a linear dependence on the peak intensity of the laser field. Surprisingly, the shift of the resonance is independent of the driving frequency, which can be attributed to the Stark shift by instantaneous polarization of the laser coupled X and B state at the instant of ionization injection.
Figure 4c shows the subcycle control of the population on the state B(v = 0) by changing the envelope phase ϕ at the resonant wavelength of 900 nm. It can be seen that the population on the state B(v = 0) is also modulated with a period of π. However, the maximum value is no longer at ϕ = 0 and the minimum value is not reached at ϕ = π∕2, which signifies that the polarization mechanism is not dominating in the case of resonance. The irregular modulation (black circles) indicates that a multichannel interference might contribute to the population increment of the state B(v = 0). Figure 4d shows the dependence of the population yields on the injection time. A striking difference with the results in Fig. 3c is that in the case of resonance, the population on the state B(v = 0) is closely related to the postionization interaction time. The population on the state B(v = 0) shows a gradual decay with decreasing coupling time in the current conditions. It should be noted that the threephoton resonant transfer from X(v = 0) to B(v = 0) at a resonant wavelength is taking place during the evolution of the quantum coherent system driven by ultrafast polarization. Therefore the population increment of the state B(v = 0) should originate from the twochannel interference, i.e., polarization and threephoton resonant coupling.
Discussions
The above results in Fig. 3 can be qualitatively explained with ultrafast polarization theory. At a particular time, nitrogen molecular ions are prepared by transient SFI, which can be regarded as an ultrafast pump for the ionic system. Immediately following SFI, the ion is polarized by the instantaneous laser field as illustrated by the contour plot shown in Fig. 3c.
Since the electronic states B and X forming a pair of charge resonance states, strong polarization could occur due to their coherent coupling in the residual laser field. For different injection instants of ionization, the polarization state of ions is different, resulting in different population increment of the state B(v = 0). For the case in Fig. 3b, the probability for populating on the state B(v = 0) is greatest at ϕ = 0 while at ϕ = π∕2, the probability is smallest. For comparisons of different ionization injection moments at the same envelope phase in Fig. 3c, the final population on the state B(v = 0) varies because the instantaneous polarizability is proportional to the transient electric field. Therefore, transient ionization injection acts as an ultrafast probe of a quantum coherent system consisting of the neutral and molecular ions. Note that we ignore the dynamic antiscreening due to the ionic core polarization^{26} on the tunneling ionization from the valence shell electrons.
The injection of ionization can be considered as an ultrafast streaking of the laserdriven ionic dynamics analogy to the attosecond streaking and transient absorption techniques^{4,5,5,36,37}. Achieving the experimental measurement analogy to attosecond streaking is a challenging and open problem due to the lacking of an attosecond pulse in the visible wavelength range. However, two approaches may be accessible to measure the transient injectioninduced population on the B state. With the aid of high harmonic sources, the phasedependent population on the X or B state can be detected by attosecond absorption spectroscopy based on the transitions from the X to C (i.e., C\({}^{2}{\Sigma }_{u}^{+}\)) state or from the B to D (i.e., D^{2}Π_{g}) state. Another possible means is to measure the absorption spectroscopy from X to B state after compressing a 400 nm pulse to a few cycles in addition to the polarization gating technique^{15,38}. The Fourier transformation of the phasedependent populations on the state B in Fig. 4c quantitatively gives the relative contributions of multiple photon dressing, which is shown in Supplementary Fig. 1. A concrete analysis on this based on an analytic solution is given in Supplementary Note 2. It is worth mentioning that for the nonparallel alignment case, transient ionization could influence both the coupling of AX and BX, which is discussed in Supplementary Note 3. Last but not the least, in the current model, we have ignored the ionization delays while injection of ions and the coherence brought by ionization. A more complete calculation including these effects will be carried out in the future.
In conclusion, we have systematically investigated the coherent evolution of nitrogen molecular ions, which are continuously injected by transient SFI in an intense laser field. It is found that the population on the excited states of nitrogen molecular ion can be greatly increased due to transientinjectioninduced collapse of a quantum system and resonant multiphoton couplings. Our findings provide crucial clues to create highintensity air lasers using femtosecond laser pulses and highlight the importance of ionizationinduced coherence. The proposed theoretical frame allows us to treat transient ionization and laserion coupling for open quantum systems under strong laser fields. It can be generalized to explore the important role of transient ionization injection in other strongfield induced nonequilibrium dynamics, e.g., localization of electrons during dissociative ionization and autoionization of molecules in intense laser pulses.
Methods
Strong field ionizationcoupling equation for ionic dynamics
We consider tunnel ionization mainly from three N_{2} molecular orbitals, i.e., HOMO (i.e., highest occupied molecular orbital), HOMO1, and HOMO2 in a linearly polarized pump laser field with the peak intensity of 3 × 10^{14} W cm^{−2}, pulse duration of 15 fs and the central wavelength of 800 nm. The ionization energies of these orbitals are respectively 15.6 eV, 17 eV and 18.8 eV^{39}. The molecular Ammosov–Delone–Krainov (MOADK) theory is employed to calculate the transient ionization rates of the involved three orbitals^{25}. Once the three ionic states \({X}^{2}{\Sigma }_{g}^{+}\) (i.e., X), A^{2}Π_{u} (i.e., A) and \({B}^{2}{\Sigma }_{u}^{+}\) (i.e., B) are prepared at the moment of ionization, population couplings among them will take place in the residual laser field.
Considering both the transient ionization injection and coupling effects, the evolution of the ionic density matrix ρ^{+}(t) in an intense laser field is given by
where H_{I} is the ionic Hamiltonian in the interaction picture whose explicit form is provided in Supplementary Note 1. The last term in Eq. (1) describing the continuous injection of ions by transient ionization within the full laser pulse is one of the significant advances in this work. Its nondiagonal elements are assumed to be zero due to a vanishing coherence resulting from transient ionization and the diagonal elements are given by
where i = X, A, B labels the electronic states and v = 0–4 are the vibrational quantum numbers. The neutral population ρ_{0} is decaying according to \(\frac{d{\rho }_{0}}{dt}={}{\sum} {\Gamma }_{iv}{\rho }_{0}\) where Γ_{iv}(t) are the ionization rates to the respective electronicvibrational states. For the time being, the rotational states are unresolved and dissipation by collisions are ignored because of the short pulse duration.
Data availability
Simulation data and figures are available from Z.Z. upon reasonable requests.
References
 1.
Eckle, P. et al. Attosecond ionization and tunneling delay time measurements in Helium. Science 322, 1525–1529 (2008).
 2.
Schultze, M. et al. Delay in photoemission. Science 328, 1658–1662 (2010).
 3.
Klünder, K. et al. Probing singlephoton ionization on the attosecond time scale. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 143002 (2011).
 4.
Goulielmakis, E. et al. Realtime observation of valence electron motion. Nature 466, 739–743 (2010).
 5.
Wirth, A. et al. Synthesized light transients. Science 334, 195–200 (2011).
 6.
Wörner, H. J. & Corkum, P. B. Imaging and controlling multielectron dynamics by laserinduced tunnel ionization. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 44, 041001 (2011).
 7.
Ossiander, M. et al. Attosecond correlation dynamics. Nat. Phys. 13, 280–285 (2017).
 8.
Sabbar, M. et al. Stateresolved attosecond reversible and irreversible dynamics in strong optical fields. Nat. Phys. 13, 472–478 (2017).
 9.
Cederbaum, L. S. & Zobeley, J. Ultrafast charge migration by electron correlation. Chem. Phys. Lett. 307, 205–210 (1999).
 10.
Cavalieri, A. L. et al. Attosecond spectroscopy in condensed matter. Nature 449, 1029–1032 (2007).
 11.
Malinauskas, M. et al. Ultrafast laser processing of materials: from science to industry. Light: Science & Applications 5, e16133 (2016).
 12.
Xu, H., Lötstedt, E., Iwasaki, A. & Yamanouchi, K. Sub10fs population inversion in N\({}_{2}^{+}\) in air lasing through multiple state coupling. Nat. Comm. 6, 8347 (2015).
 13.
Yao, J. et al. Population redistribution among multiple electronic states of molecular nitrogen ions in strong laser fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 143007 (2016).
 14.
Liu, Y. et al. Recollisioninduced superradiance of ionized nitrogen molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 133203 (2015).
 15.
Li, H. et al. Significant enhancement of N\({}_{2}^{+}\) lasing by polarizationmodulated ultrashort laser pulses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 013202 (2019).
 16.
Misyrowicz, A. et al. Lasing without population inversion in N\({}_{2}^{+}\). APL Photon 4, 110807 (2019).
 17.
Keldysh, L. V. Ionization in the field of a stong electromagnetic wave. Sov. Phys. JETP 20, 1307 (1965).
 18.
van der Hart, H. W., Lysaght, M. A. & Burke, P. G. Timedependent multielectron dynamics of Ar in intense short laser pulses. Phys. Rev. A 76, 043405 (2007).
 19.
Lein, M. & Kummel, S. Exact timedependent exchangecorrelation potentials for strongfield electron dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 143003 (2005).
 20.
Santra, R., Dunford, R. W. & Young, L. Spinorbit effect on strong field ionization of krypton. Phys. Rev. A 74, 043403 (2006).
 21.
Rohringer, N. & Santra, R. Multichannel coherence in strong field ionization. Phys. Rev. A 79, 053402 (2009).
 22.
Zhang, Y., Lötstedt, E. & Yamanouchi, K. Population inversion in a strongly driven twolevel system at faroff resonance. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 50, 185603 (2017).
 23.
Zhang, Y., Lötstedt, E. & Yamanouchi, K. Mechanism of population inversion in laserdriven N\({}_{2}^{+}\). J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 52, 055401 (2019).
 24.
Leth, H. A., Madsen, L. B. & Mølmer, K. Monte carlo wave packet theory of dissociative double ionization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 183601 (2009).
 25.
Tong, X. M., Zhao, Z. X. & Lin, C. D. Theory of molecular tunneling ionization. Phys. Rev. A 66, 033402 (2002).
 26.
Zhang, B., Yuan, J. & Zhao, Z. Dynamic core polarization in strongfield ionization of CO molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 163001 (2013).
 27.
Litvinyuk, I. V. et al. Shakeup excitation during optical tunnel ionization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 033003 (2005).
 28.
Bryan, W. A. et al. Atomic excitation during recollisionfree ultrafast multielectron tunnel ionization. Nat. Phys 2, 379–383 (2006).
 29.
Britton, M. et al. Testing the role of recollision in N\({}_{2}^{+}\) air lasing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 133208 (2018).
 30.
Li, H. et al. Air lasing from singly ionized N_{2} driven by bicircular twocolor fields. Phys. Rev. A 99, 053413 (2019).
 31.
Alf, L. & Paul, H. K. The spectrum of molecular nitrogen. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 6, 113 (1977).
 32.
Yao, J. et al. Highbrightness switchable multiwavelength remote laser in air. Phys. Rev. A 84, 051802 (2011).
 33.
Xie, H. et al. Coupling of N\({}_{2}^{+}\) rotational states in an air laser from tunnelionized nitrogen molecules. Phys. Rev. A 90, 042504 (2014).
 34.
Zhong, X. et al. Vibrational and electronic excitation of ionized nitrogen molecules in intense laser fields. Phys. Rev. A 96, 043422 (2017).
 35.
Miao, Z. et al. StimulatedRamanscatteringassisted superfluorescence enhancement from ionized nitrogen molecules in 800nm femtosecond laser fields. Phys. Rev. A 98, 033402 (2018).
 36.
Itatani, J. et al. Attosecond streak camara. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 173903 (2002).
 37.
Chini, M. et al. Subcycle ac stark shift of helium excited states probed with isolated attosecond pulses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 073601 (2012).
 38.
Xie, H. et al. Vibrational population transfer between electronic states of N\({}_{2}^{+}\) in polarizationmodulated intense laser fields. Phys. Rev. A 100, 053419 (2019).
 39.
Chong, D. P., Gritsenko, O. V. & Baerends, E. J. Interpretation of the KohnSham orbital energies as approximate vertical ionization potentials. J. Chem. Phys. 116, 1760 (2002).
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by China National Key R&D Program (Grant no. 2019YFA0307703), the Major Research plan of NSF (Grant no. 91850201), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 61705034, 61605227 and 11704066) and Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province (Grant no. 20171BAB211007), Science and Technology Project of Jiangxi Provincial Education Department (Grant nos. GJJ160587 and GJJ160576).
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
Z.Z. conceived the idea. Q.Z. did the numerical modeling and simulations under supervision by H.X. and Z.Z.. H.X. and Z.Z. prepared the paper. G.L., X.W., H.L., J.Z. and Z.C. participated in the discussions. J.Y. and Y.C. stimulated this work and reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Q., Xie, H., Li, G. et al. Subcycle coherent control of ionic dynamics via transient ionization injection. Commun Phys 3, 50 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s4200502003217
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Further reading

Coherent control of the multiple wavelength lasing of ${\rm N}_2^ +$: coherence transfer and beyond
Optica (2021)

Multiwave mixing in the high harmonic regime: monitoring electronic dynamics
Optics Express (2021)

Electronic quantum coherence encoded in temporal structures of N2+ lasing
Physical Review A (2021)

Optical amplification from high vibrational states of ionized nitrogen molecules generated by 800nm femtosecond laser pulses
Optics Express (2021)

Revealing Molecular Strong Field Autoionization Dynamics
Physical Review Letters (2021)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.