Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Spin accumulation in photo-induced potential dimples generated in semiconductors

Abstract

Conventional ways of confining charges in semiconductors employ advanced lithographic and crystal-growth techniques. The construction of micro/nano-scale structures is also essential for manipulating spins. However, existing techniques are not always flexible enough to control spins in appropriate positions and timings. Here we report an alternative mechanism, which enables us to design temporal and reconfigurable low-dimensional potentials. The formation of photo-induced potential dimples is deduced from time and spatially-resolved Kerr rotation measurements performed on a GaAs quantum well. Two-dimensional images of spin distributions reveal that the photo-injected electron spins in a small area illuminated by a pump light survive for a time that is two orders of magnitude longer than typical recombination lifetimes. The Kerr rotation dependence on the pump laser conditions implies that the temporally generated dimple-shaped potential profile induced by remote charges effectively confines the electrons and enhances the spin lifetime determined by fluctuating spin-orbit effective magnetic fields.

Introduction

Designing potential profiles that confine charge carriers in a small region of semiconductor materials is the underlying basis of semiconductor devices and also of modern experiments performed during scientific research. Low-dimensional electron systems are also indispensable for exploring novel functionalities of semiconductor spintronics. The voltage control of spin–orbit interaction (SOI)1 has been demonstrated by using electrons confined in an asymmetric quantum well (QW) structure. Unfortunately, the SOI also has an adverse effect on the spin coherence lifetime, which is shortened by the fluctuating spin–orbit magnetic fields associated with the random motion of the diffusive two-dimensional electrons2. The tunability of SOI provides a solution; a balanced Rashba3 and Dresselhaus4 SOI condition for two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) in zinc-blende type semiconductors provides an SU(2) spin-rotation symmetry, and the resultant persistent spin helix mode can have an extended lifetime5,6,7,8. Another approach, which does not require the precise tuning of the Rashba SOI, is to reduce the confinement size; the spin relaxation mechanism can be suppressed by confining electrons spins further towards a one9,10,11,12,13,14 or zero15,16,17,18 dimensional area.

Until now, the conventional methods for realizing a low-dimensional confinement potential in semiconductors include a bottom-up approach based on self-assembled crystal growth19, and top-down fabrication techniques using lithography and etching for the precisely designed structures. However, the potential landscapes obtained by these methods restrict the carrier motion in predetermined areas or channels, which cannot be altered flexibly once their geometries are fixed. To incorporate the benefit of controllable SOI while preserving spin coherence, we require a more flexible potential that yields appropriate confinement at an appropriate timing.

Here, we report a way of realizing a reconfigurable confinement potential that is formed instantaneously by simple light exposure in a semiconductor thin layer. The feasibility of the light-induced temporal confinement potential was revealed by time and spatially resolved Kerr rotation (KR) measurements of the spin dynamics in an undoped GaAs/AlAs QW. We found that the potential energy for the conduction band electrons was spatially modulated by charge carriers co-excited in a separate GaAs buffer layer. This fact enabled us to enhance the electron spin lifetime in the QW by reducing the spatial size of the photo-induced confinement. This temporal and reformable way of modulating potential profiles for spins in semiconductors offers a solution to extend the spin lifetime in a different approach from those reported previously5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27, and opens the way to the efficient control of spin coherence in future spintronics applications.

Results

Long-lasting Kerr signal from locally accumulated spins

The KR measurements with well-focused pump and probe beams illuminated at a same position on the sample exhibited unexpectedly long-lasting spin signals. Figure 1a shows the layout for the pump and probe measurements. For time-resolved KR measurements in the absence of an external magnetic field, both the pump and probe wavelengths were tuned to the lowest heavy-hole exciton transition energy (1.530 eV). When we used a pump beam with a full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM) diameter of 7.6 μm (the red line in Fig. 1b), the KR angle (θK) survived even at Δt = 12 ns, which is the maximum delay determined by the repetition interval of the mode-locked laser pulses. An exponential fit to the data for 7 ns ≤ Δt ≤ 12 ns gives a time constant of 15.2 ns, which is two orders of magnitude longer than the typical radiative recombination lifetime (0.1–1 ns)28,29. The nonlinearity in the semi-log plot of KR at an earlier region of the delay time possibly originated from multiple causes including fast hole spin relaxation and diffusive dilution of spins in lateral directions. In the following discussion, we focus mainly on the slowly decaying exponential component observed in the KR data.

Fig. 1: Time-resolved Kerr rotation measurement.
figure1

a Schematic view of the setup. b Kerr rotation angle (θK) as a function of pump and probe delay (Δt) measured for different pump spot sizes in the absence of external magnetic field (Bext). The vertical axis is plotted in a log-scale. The three solid lines show the data measured with a 45°-incident pump (setup shown in a), and their pump beam waist sizes (ϕpump) were characterized by the analysis of the data shown in c. The dashed line shows the data for a smaller pump spot (ϕpump ~ 3 μm) with a separate setup, which had collinear pump and probe beams along the sample normal. c The pump induced changes in the KR, ΔθK = θKt = +200 ps) − θKt = −200 ps), plotted as a function of the probe position scanned along the short axis of the elliptic pump spots. Fits to the data with the Gaussian (lines) give full-width at half maximum (FWHM) spot sizes of 7.6, 15, 28 μm.

This long KR decay indicates that for some reason part of spin-polarized electrons or holes are accumulated in the illuminated area. Generally, in undoped semiconductors, a circularly-polarized light generates electron and holes, and thus both electron and hole dynamics or their recombination are expected to contribute to the spin dynamics of the whole system20,21,22. Because the KR decay time observed in our undoped QW was unexpectedly long, it requires an alternative explanation. A recently reported model for the long spin relaxation time observed in an undoped GaAs/AlGaAs interface23 is not appropriate here because our sample has no single-hetero interface, where electron spins can be accumulated. Another possibility is isolated electrons resulting from dilute impurities unintentionally doped in the QW in the same way observed in n-doped GaAs24,25,26. However, we can exclude this possibility. The background impurity level of our GaAs epitaxial layer was estimated to be of the order of ~1014 cm−3, which corresponds to ~108 cm−2 in the a 20-nm-thick QW, meaning that ~101 spins trapped in the impurities must be detected with a 3-μm-diameter probe. This number is too small for the KR signal detected in our measurements. In addition, our experimental results showing clear spin diffusion in the pumped area (discussed later) ruled out the possibility of a carrier trap caused by the impurities in the QW.

A striking feature of the KR signal was that its lifetime was clearly enhanced by reducing the size of the initial distribution of photo-injected spins. The set of data shown in Fig. 1b compares the dependence of the KR decay time on the pump spot size. The three solid lines were measured by changing the pump spot sizes with the measurement setup shown in Fig. 1a. The FWHMs of pump beam waists of 7.6, 15, and 28 μm were obtained by fitting the pump induced changes in KR, ΔθK = θKt = +200 ps) − θKt = −200 ps), which were plotted as a function of the probe position along the short axis of the elliptic pump spot (Fig. 1c). The widths in the orthogonal direction were ~1.4 times larger than these values, because the pump incident angle was inclined at 45° from the sample normal. To ensure that the pump power density at the center was the same for all the experimental conditions, we used a higher power for a pump focused on a larger spot size than for one focused on a smaller spot. As shown by the result in Fig. 1b, the KR decay time of the three data increases as the spot size decreases. We also measured the KR decay for a smaller pump spot size (~3 μm), which was achieved by focusing the pump through a higher magnification lens with a normal incident angle. Although the measurement condition was not completely the same as that of the setup with the 45°-incident pump, the KR result (dashed line) maintained the trend of KR lifetime enhancement and clearly shows the longest decay time among the four data. We note that a recent study27 discusses the role of non-radiative excitons with large in-plane wave vectors as the source of the nanosecond spin lifetimes observed in an undoped QW. However, this possibility cannot fully explain the pump spot size dependence of the spin lifetime observed here.

Spin diffusion in an excited area

Evidence that electron spins diffuse in the pumped area was obtained by measuring the spatio-temporal behavior of spins in an externally applied magnetic field. To confirm the long-lived KR is determined solely by electrons, we employed the method reported by Kohda et al.30, which enables us to extract the momentum dependence of SOI. We defined the direction of Bext as the xs axis and its perpendicular direction as the ys axis. (see Fig. 1a). The application of Bext drives spin precession with an angular frequency Ω = gμBBext/ħ, where g is the g factor, ħ is the reduced Planck constant, and μB is the Bohr magneton. The KR oscillations at the pump-probe overlap (xs = 0 and ys = 0) in Fig. 2a correspond to the spin precession determined solely by Bext = 0.1 T applied in the [100] direction. The extracted value, |g| = 0.32, is close to that of electrons observed in similar QW structures31. We did not see the beating of KR oscillation due to the coexistence of both electron and hole spins, indicating that hole spins are depolarized in a very short time. Then, motorized stages scanned the probe positions along the xs axis and its perpendicular axis (ys). For both scanning directions, the KR signal did not show significant expansion in the QW plane in the measurement time range. When we scanned the probe position on the xs (||[100]) axis, the frequency Ω changed monotonically at around the center; whereas it was almost constant for the scan along the ys (||[010]) direction. This phenomenon is discussed by Kohda et al.30; electrons at off-center positions have experienced non-zero averaged momentum, which induces additive or subtractive changes in the effective magnetic fields depending on the moving direction. Thus, the clear dependence of spin precessions on the probe position indicates that individual electron spins are not completely localized but move around in the excited area of the QW.

Fig. 2: Spin diffusion dynamics measured under external magnetic fields.
figure2

a Density maps of Kerr rotation angle (θK) plotted as a function of the pump-probe delay (Δt) and probe positions. We applied an external magnetic field (Bext = 0.1 T) in the [100] direction and scanned the probe position in xs (||[100]) and ys (||[010]) axes. b The extracted spin precession frequency gradients in xs (black squares) and ys (red circles) directions are plotted as a function of θ, which is the angle between the external magnetic field (Bext) and the \([1\bar 10]\) direction. Error bars represent standard deviations resulting from the linear least-square fitting to the Kerr rotation oscillation frequencies. c The spin–orbit effective magnetic field vectors expected from the results shown in b are schematically plotted in momentum space.

Further analysis of the spatially-dependent spin precession frequencies suggests the involvement of conduction band electrons as the source of the long-lived spins. As show in Fig. 2b, we extracted the spin–orbit-induced change in the spin precession, dΩ/dxs and dΩ/dys, for different sample orientations defined by θ, which is the angle of the in-plane crystallographic direction \([1\bar 10]\) with respect to the xs axis (see Fig. 1a). The sinusoidal dependences of dΩ/dxs and dΩ/dys correspond to the vectors of the spin–orbit effective magnetic field plotted in a momentum space (Fig. 2c), which agrees with the symmetry of the k-linear Dresselhaus SOI for the conduction band but not for the valence band. Thus, from these results we infer that the conduction band electron spins contribute dominantly to the observed KR.

Remote effect from charges excited in a separate layer

Another important clue to the cause of the unexpectedly long-lasting KR was obtained from cw measurements of pump-induced reflectivity change (ΔR) and KR spectra, which indicated a contribution made by carrier excitation in a bulk GaAs buffer layer. Since spin-related signals are accumulated by a pump pulse train due to their long decay times (as discussed in Fig. 1b), we were able to observe clear pump-induced ΔR and KR signals even when we used cw lasers rather than pulsed lasers. We fixed the cw probe energy (Eprobe) at around the HH exciton energy, and scanned the pump energy (Epump). As shown in Fig. 3, both ΔR and KR have clear peak or dip structures at the HH exciton energy (Epump = 1.530 eV) and the LH exciton energy (Epump = 1.535 eV). The clear difference between the signs of the two KR features is because the electrons have opposite spin directions that are determined by the selection rule of the inter-band optical transition32. In addition to these reasonable spectrum shapes originating from the QW, ΔR has notable features even at a lower pump energy (Epump = 1.514 eV), which is around the free exciton or donor-bound exciton energies in bulk GaAs25. Such upconversion-like behavior in ΔR was not observed in the KR spectrum, indicating that the pump at Epump = 1.514 eV does not excite spin polarized carriers in the QW. We infer that the electric field generated by the carriers excited in the bulk GaAs buffer layer remotely affects the electrons excited in the QW.

Fig. 3: Pump energy dependence of optical reflectivity and Kerr rotation measured with a fixed probe energy.
figure3

Two-color measurements of the reflectivity change (ΔR) and Kerr rotation (KR) were performed with pump and probe beams from two identical continuous wave lasers. The probe energy (fixed at 1.530 eV) corresponds to the lowest electron-heavy hole exciton energy in the quantum well.

Discussion

The experimental results described in Figs. 1, 2 indicate that the locally-generated spins do not expand, or expand only slightly, even though a clear signature of electron spin diffusion was observed in the spatially-resolved spin precession frequency. If we assume that 2DEG spins, or spins that diffuse over the region illuminated by the pump, are involved in the observed KR signal, the Gaussian spin density profile will initially expand with a speed determined by Ds. Because of this expansion, the upper limit of the KR decay constant at early times will be determined by a prefactor33, \(\sigma _{{\mathrm{pump}}}^2/(\sigma _{{\mathrm{pump}}}^2 + 2D_{\mathrm{s}}t)\), where \(\sigma _{{\mathrm{pump}}} = \phi _{{\mathrm{pump}}}/(2\sqrt {2\ln 2} )\). This diffusive dilution is more prominent for smaller σpump values. When we assume Ds = 25 cm2 s−1 and ϕpump = 3 μm, the diffusive dilution reduces the spin density by ~87% of the initial value in 5 ns. However, we do not see such a rapid decay in the time-resolved data measured with a 3 μm pump spot diameter (Fig. 1b). This fact suggests that the observed long-lasting KR was possibly assisted by additional forces that suppress the expansion of the locally generated electron spin density profile.

This characteristic behavior of the local spin distribution suggests the occurrence of the light-induced temporal confinement of electrons in the QW. As we have discussed in Fig. 3, the carriers excited in the bulk GaAs buffer layer should have a non-negligible electrostatic effect on the QW. Because carriers in the bulk GaAs buffer layer are co-excited even when we use the pump laser tuned at the QW energy, we can expect the similar remote effect also in the time-resolved measurements of spins in the QW (Figs. 1, 2). This is also supported by the fact that part of the carriers generated in the buffer layer persist over a timescale of ~10 ns (Supplementary Note 1). In our study, the notable enhancement of the KR decay was observed when we shrank the pump spot sizes (3–28 μm) across the wavelength of the SOI-induced electron-spin precession (λSO ~ 24 μm)31,34. This fact implies that the observed spin dynamics are governed by the D’yakonov-Perel’ spin relaxation mechanism8 which can be suppressed by carrier confinement on the scale of the pump spot size. The temporal potential modulation in the QW can be induced by photo-generated space charges co-excited in the bulk GaAs buffer layer. Probable causes of these space charges are the dilute background impurities in the buffer layer. Because their positions are well separated from each other, electrons and holes trapped in these impurities cannot recombine in a short time. The resultant ionized impurities survive for a long time and affect the potential in the QW. Note that the dependence of KR on the bottom barrier thickness (Supplementary Note 2) and on the pump power (Supplementary Note 3) were also consistent with this assumption.

The above interpretation is also supported by our numerical simulations. Although it will require further careful study to identify the origin of the localized charge distributions that occur in the GaAs buffer layer, we can show that a small discrepancy in the negative and positive charge distributions induces a confinement potential with reasonable sizes and depths. Below we present a simple model that supports the possibility of photo-induced potential dimples that store electron spins in the separated QW layer.

We assume that the GaAs buffer layer has a small discrepancy in the charge expansions between positive and negative charge distributions, which can be caused by the different dynamics of electron and hole diffusion during their energy relaxation. To calculate the potential profile induced by these charges, we set the same number of positive and negative charges scattered randomly in the 1 μm layer of GaAs with a uniform distribution in the z-direction, and a symmetric 2D normal distribution with FWHM widths of ϕ+ = 10 μm, and ϕ = 10 + δϕ (μm) for positive and negative charges, respectively (Fig. 4a). Figure 4b shows an example of the calculated potential in the QW layer, where we used 1014 cm−3 for the positive charge concentrations at the center axis of doped area, and δϕ = 0.5 μm. The resultant bowl-shaped profile has a depth of ~20 meV and a size of ~10 μm. Figure 4c shows that the potential at the center becomes deeper as the δϕ value increases. These results indicate, if the deviation between the electron and hole distributions is of the order of 0.1 μm or larger, the potential dimples induced by the dilute space charges are sufficiently effective to confine electrons at a low temperature.

Fig. 4: Calculation of the light induced confinement potential.
figure4

a Schematic of the charge distribution assumed in the model. b Electro-static potential profile for electrons in the quantum well layer, V(x, y), was calculated by assuming that the difference in distribution widths of positive and negative charges was δϕ = 0.5 μm. c The depth of the potential dimple (V at the position above the center of the charge distribution) as a function of δϕ.

To clarify the impact of light-induced confinement on the spin dynamics, we calculated the spatio-temporal evolution of photo-injected spins using a semi-classical Monte-Carlo approach (See Supplementary Note 4 for detailed procedure.). As a confinement potential generated by photo-generated remote charges, we assumed a simple two-dimensional parabolic function,

$$V(x,y)\,=\,C(x^2\,+\,y^2),$$
(1)

where the prefactor C was chosen so that the potential maintains the lateral extent of the electron distribution at the initial Gaussian shape determined by the pump spot sizes. The parameter used in the simulation was Ds = 25 cm2 s−1. For the spin–orbit interaction, we included only the k-linear Dresselhaus term with the strength β = 1.9 meVÅ, which should be dominant in the present system. For simplicity, we assumed a constant Fermi velocity vF = 4.3 × 104 m s−1 and ignored the dynamic change in the potential over time. The initial spin distributions were set as symmetric two-dimensional Gaussians with FWHM diameters of 3, 10, 20, and 30 μm. Figure 5 shows the calculated spin density component along the z-axis as a function of delay time. As we expected, the calculated time scales of the spin decay clearly depend on the pump spot size. This agrees qualitatively with our results shown in Fig. 1b. Thus, the motional narrowing effect for the spin dynamics determined by the D’yakonov Perel’ mechanism explains the observed phenomena quite reasonably.

Fig. 5: Monte-Carlo simulation of electron spins diffusing in a two-dimensional parabolic confinement potential.
figure5

The z-components of spin density (ρz) are plotted as a function of time for different initial Gaussian sizes (ϕ0).

In conclusion, a light-induced mesoscopic confinement potential significantly enhances electron spin lifetime in semiconductors. Such a temporal, non-destructive, and reconfigurable way of confining charges and spins is appealing for designing novel functionalities requiring the flexible motion of information carriers. The combination of this phenomenon with the current MEMS technology for scanning the light spot will also provide a possibility to change the potential with desired shapes and motions over time. Furthermore, the light-induced potential modulation can be effective for different materials or structures attached on the surface of semiconductors, since the electric field is remotely supplied from the space charges in a separate layer. The wavelength selectivity of the optical access for generating the space charges will allow us to scale up the desired temporal confinement areas towards multiple layers, indicating that the mechanism will be compatible with advanced band engineering. Thus, our photo-assisted method for confining electrons will provide fascinating options for exploring spin properties in semiconductors.

Methods

Sample

The single QW was grown on a semi-insulating GaAs (001) substrate by molecular-beam epitaxy. The layer structure was, from the bottom, a 1-μm-thick GaAs buffer, a 227-nm-thick short-period GaAs (1.4 nm)/AlAs (0.8 nm) superlattice bottom barrier, a 20-nm-thick GaAs QW, a 485-nm-thick top barrier, and a 5-nm-thick GaAs cap. All the layers were nominally undoped. The carbon impurity concentration in the epitaxial layer of nominally undoped GaAs was estimated to be of the order of 1014 cm−3 by SIMS measurements, and this agrees with the hole concentration obtained with conventional Hall measurements. The high crystal quality of the QW was expected from the fact that the 2DEG mobilities in high electron mobility transistor (HEMT) structures grown in the same MBE chamber were ~100 m2 V−1 s−1 at 4 K.

Magneto-optic Kerr rotation measurements

To investigate the dynamics of the local spin distribution, we carried out time and spatially resolved magneto-optic KR measurements at 8 K. A pair of mode-locked Ti:sapphire lasers provided 1.5 ps pump and 8 ps probe pulses at a frequency of 82 MHz for injecting and detecting spins in the QW. A photoelastic modulator (PEM) operating at 50.1 kHz modulated the pump beam polarization between left and right circular polarizations, and an acousto-optic modulator (AOM) operating at 52.0 kHz modulated the intensity of the linearly polarized probe beam. The difference between the modulation frequencies, 1.9 kHz, was used as the reference of lock-in detection. The circularly-polarized pump beam excited spin polarized electrons32,35, and subsequent spin density dynamics were measured through the magneto-optic Kerr effect of the reflected linearly polarized probe beam. The choice of the collimating and focusing lenses used for the pump beam allowed us to change the pump spot size. We consider that the circularly polarized pump both for 0° and 45° incident angles generates electron spins in the z direction, and the KR is proportional to the z component of spins in the QW. The ~3 μm (FWHM) spot of the probe beam can be scanned in the sample plane, which enabled us to measure two-dimensional images of the spin densities at a certain pump-probe delay time Δt. The optical powers for the pump and probe light were smaller than of the order of ~μW and ~0.1 μW, respectively. We measured the output current of a balanced photodiode bridge through the lock-in amplifier and recorded it as the KR signal. In addition to KR, we also detected the reflected probe intensity R with a single photodiode. The small difference between R with and without pump excitation, i.e., \(\Delta R = R_{{\mathrm{Pump}}\;{\mathrm{ON}}} - R_{{\mathrm{Pump}}\;{\mathrm{OFF}}}\), was measured with a single photodiode in the same way as with the KR setup except that the pump was linearly polarized and its intensity was modulated with another AOM operating at 50.1 kHz instead of the PEM used in the KR measurements.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Nitta, J., Akazaki, T., Takayanagi, H. & Enoki, T. Gate control of spin-orbit interaction in an inverted In0.53Ga0.47As/In0.52Al0.48As heterostructure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1335–1338 (1997).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    D’yakonov, M. I. & Perel’, V. I. Spin relaxation of conduction electrons in noncentrosymmetric semiconductors. Sov. Phys. Solid State 13, 3023–3026 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bychkov, Y. & Rashba, E. I. Properties of a 2D electron gas with lifted spectral degeneracy. JTEP 39, 66 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Dresselhaus, G. Spin-orbit coupling effects in zinc blende structures. Phys. Rev. 100, 580 (1955).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Schliemann, J. & Loss, D. Anisotropic transport in a two-dimensional electron gas in the presence of spin–orbit coupling. Phys. Rev. B 68, 165311 (2003).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Bernevig, B. A., Orenstein, J. & Zhang, S.-C. Exact SU(2) symmetry and persistent spin helix in a spin–orbit coupled system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 236601 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Koralek, J. D. et al. Emergence of the persistent spin helix in semiconductor quantum wells. Nature 458, 610 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kunihashi, Y. et al. Drift transport of helical spin coherence with tailored spin–orbit interactions. Nat. Commun. 7, 10722 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bournel, A., Dollfus, P., Bruno, P. & Hesto, P. Gate-induced spin precession in an In0.53Ga0.47As two dimensional electron gas. Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 4, 1–4 (1998).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Mal’shukov, A. G. & Chao, K. A. Waveguide diffusion modes and slowdown of D’yakonov-Perel’ spin relaxation in narrow two-dimensional semiconductor channels. Phys. Rev. B 61, R21413(R) (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Kiselev, A. A. & Kim, K. W. Progressive suppression of spin relaxation in two-dimensional channels of finite width. Phys. Rev. B 61, 13115 (2000).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Holleitner, A. W., Shi, V., Myers, R. C., Gossard, A. C. & Awschalom, D. D. Suppression of spin relaxation in submicron InGaAs wire. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 036805 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kunihashi, Y., Kohda, M. & Nitta, J. Enhancement of spin lifetime in gate-fitted InGaAs narrow wires. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 226601 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kunihashi, Y., Kohda, M. & Nitta, J. Semiclassical approach for spin dephasing in a quasi-one-dimensional channel. Phys. Rev. B 85, 035321 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Stotz, J. A. H., Hey, R., Santos, P. V. & Ploog, K. H. Coherent spin transport through dynamic quantum dots. Nat. Mater. 4, 585–588 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Berezovsky, J., Mikkelsen, M. H., Stoltz, N. G., Coldren, L. A. & Awschalom, D. D. Picosecond coherent optical manipulation of single electron spin in a quantum dot. Science 320, 349–352 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Press, D., Ladd, T. D., Zhang, B. & Yamamoto, Y. Complete quantum control of single quantum dot spin using ultrafast optical pulses. Nature 456, 218–221 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Markmann, S., Reichl, C. & Salis, G. Universal nuclear focusing of confined electron spins. Nat. Commun. 10, 1097 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Michler, P. (ed.) Single Semiconductor Quantum Dots (Springer, Berlin, 2009).

  20. 20.

    Ostanický, T. et al. Electron- and hole-spin relaxation within excitons in GaAs quantum wells by non-degenerate pump-and-probe measurements. Phys. Rev. B 75, 165311 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Urdanivia, J. et al. Quenching of the exciton-spin relaxation via exchange interaction in GaAs/AlxGa1-xAs quantum wells. Phys. Rev. B 65, 115336 (2002).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Snoke, D. W., Rüle, W. W., Köhler, K. & Ploog, K. Spin flip of excitons in GaAs quantum wells. Phys. Rev. B 55, 13789–13794 (1997).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Nádvorník, L. et al. Long-range and high-speed electronic spin-transport at GaAs/AlGaAs semiconductor interface. Sci. Rep. 6, 22901 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Kikkawa, J. M. & Awschalom, D. D. Resonant spin amplification in n-type GaAs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4313–4316 (1998).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Dzhioev, R. I. et al. Low-temperature spin relaxation in n-type GaAs. Phys. Rev. B 66, 245204 (2002).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Fu, K.-M. et al. Millisecond spin-flip times of donor-bound electrons in GaAs. Phys. Rev. B 74, 121304(R) (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Trifonov, A. V. et al. Nanosecond spin coherence time of nonradiative excitons in GaAs/AlGaAs quantum wells. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 147401 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Polland, H.-J., Schultheis, L., Kuhl, J., Göbel, E. O. & Tu, C. W. Lifetime enhancement of two-dimensional excitons by the quantum-confined stark effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2610–2613 (1985).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Gurioli, M. et al. Temperature dependence of the radiative and nonradiative recombination time in GaAs/AlxGa1-xAs quantum-well structures. Phys. Rev. B 44, 3115–3124 (1991).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Kohda, M. et al. All-optical evaluation of spin–orbit interaction based on diffusive spin motion in a two-dimensional electron gas. Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 172402 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Sanada, H. et al. Manipulation of mobile spin coherence using magnetic-field-free electron spin resonance. Nat. Phys. 9, 280–283 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Meier, F. & Zakharchenya, B. P. (eds). Optical Orientation. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1984).

  33. 33.

    Salis, G., Walser, M. P., Altmann, P., Reichl, C. & Wegscheider, W. Dynamics of a localized spin excitation close to the spin-helix regime. Phys. Rev. B 89, 045304 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Sanada, H. et al. Acoustically induced spin–orbit interactions revealed by two-dimensional imaging of spin transport in GaAs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 216602 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Nastos, F. et al. Full band structure LDA and k·p calculations of optical spin injection. Phys. Rev. B 76, 205113 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank P.V. Santos for useful discussions. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP15H05699 and JP16H03821.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

H.S., Y.K., H.G. and T.S. designed the experiments; K.O. and H.S. designed the sample structure; K.O. grew the sample; H.S., A.M.S. and F.T. performed the measurements; H.S. and Y.T. performed the numerical simulation; M.K. and J.N. provided theoretical support and conceptual advice; H.S. wrote the manuscript; and all the authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript at all stages.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Sanada.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sanada, H., Stramma, A.M., Kunihashi, Y. et al. Spin accumulation in photo-induced potential dimples generated in semiconductors. Commun Phys 3, 11 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-020-0280-z

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing