Abstract
In living organisms, enzyme catalysis takes place in aqueous media with extraordinary spatiotemporal control and precision. The mechanistic knowledge of enzyme catalysis and related approaches of creating a suitable microenvironment for efficient chemical transformations have been an important source of inspiration for the design of biomimetic artificial catalysts. However, in “nature-like” environments, it has proven difficult for artificial catalysts to promote effective chemical transformations. Besides, control over reaction rate and selectivity are important for smart application purposes. These can be achieved via incorporation of stimuli-responsive features into the structure of smart catalytic systems. Here, we summarize such catalytic systems whose activity can be switched ‘on’ or ‘off’ by the application of stimuli in aqueous environments. We describe the switchable catalytic systems capable of performing organic transformations with classification in accordance to the stimulating agent. Switchable catalytic activity in aqueous environments provides new possibilities for the development of smart materials for biomedicine and chemical biology. Moreover, engineering of aqueous catalytic systems can be expected to grow in the coming years with a further broadening of its application to diverse fields.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The enzymes in natural biosynthetic processes work in aqueous environment, where they reach amazing levels of efficiency, and selectivity. Enzyme catalysis is often used in nature to control formation of molecules and/or complex structures for achieving homeostasis, motility, and signaling processes. The catalytic processes generally take place in parallel, and the required spatiotemporal control of the catalytic activity often entails its modulation by physicochemical stimuli such as small molecules, light, temperature, and pH1. Stimuli-induced enzyme catalysis and the underlying mechanism have been an important source of inspiration for the design of biomimetic artificial catalysts. Scientists have devoted many efforts to obtain artificial catalytic systems in aqueous environment with the aim of mimicking the levels of performance of natural enzymes2,3. However, the artificial catalysis usually takes place according to the initially chosen reaction conditions, and lacks the control over the chemical process4. The rate of chemical transformations can be modulated employing stimuli-triggered catalysts having stimuli-responsive features in the structure of the catalytic systems5,6,7,8.
In aqueous media, the artificial switchable catalysis could be a key factor to develop more efficient nature-inspired catalytic systems for the green industrial processes9,10. At this regards, organic transformations have been studied in water as the reaction medium11,12,13,14. Water possesses many desirable characteristics as reaction medium due to its environmental friendliness, high polarity, large cohesive energy, high heat capacity, and hydrogen bonding abilities that may influence reaction rate and selectivity12,15. Besides, use of water as reaction medium benefits chemical processes by allowing mild reaction conditions, simplifying operations, and sometimes providing unforeseen reactivities and selectivities13,16. Despite this, organocatalytic reactions in aqueous environments encounter considerable challenges such as poor reactant solubility, transition states destabilization due to disturbance of hydrogen bonding interactions, and poor hydrolytic stability of catalytic intermediates or chemical species17,18. Over the past few decades, attempts have been made to overcome these challenges for various organic transformations in aqueous media14,19,20,21,22. However, achieving reversible control over chemical transformations in aqueous environment remains a challenge.
There have been few studies devoted to the controlled organic transformations in aqueous environment employing switchable catalytic systems, whose catalytic activity can be switched ‘on’ and ‘off’ by stimuli. These systems are promising candidates for the application in biological environments and/or industrial processes. Generally, these catalyst systems have smart structural features that respond reversibly according to the presence/absence of stimuli for speeding up or slowing down the reaction rate. The switching mechanism of these systems mostly depends on (i) accessibility of the active sites of catalytic system that can be modified by the stimulus due to change in electronic, steric, or cooperative effects in the systems, and (ii) availability of suitable microenvironment via aggregation/dissociation of the catalytic system in presence/absence of external stimulus. For example, temperature-, pH-responsive catalytic systems usually change the aggregation state for suitable microenvironment in presence/absence of stimuli, whereas light-, small molecule-responsive catalytic systems depend on the electronic, steric, or cooperative effect of the system for accessing the active site of the catalyst.
In this review, we describe stimuli-induced artificial switchable catalytic systems with classification in accordance to the stimulating agent (Fig. 1). The scope of this review encompasses organic reactions in aqueous buffer solution or water/organic solvents mixture. We discuss the state-of-the-art and identify the challenges in this field. We describe “in water”14 stimuli-switchable systems, where the reactants, catalyst, and products are present in aqueous (buffer) solution. We also describe “on water”20 stimuli-switchable systems, which comprise emulsions, hydrogels, and supramolecular assemblies or immobilized catalyst on solid support, where water exerts a critical effect on the reaction rate. However, biocatalysis23,24,25 for organic reactions in aqueous medium have not discussed here as they involve enzyme engineering, and are not fully synthetic systems. Altogether, switchable catalysis for organic transformations in “nature like” environment would find applications in smart materials such as self-healing materials, controlled delivery, spatiotemporal on-demand drug synthesis, therapeutics, and soft robotics. The examples of different chemical transformations have summarized in Table 1, and this article is divided according to the stimulating agent employed for switchable catalytic systems, which we now describe.
pH-induced switchable catalytic systems
Change in pH in aqueous solution can substantially change the property of the medium and physicochemical responses of the species that present in the solution. In nature, many enzymatic reactions are pH-sensitive26,27,28,29. pH stimulus can regulate the catalytic activity of natural enzymes, where the conversion of substrate to product takes place within the microenvironment of a catalytic site. As an example, triosephosphate isomerase (TIM) is a crucial enzyme in the glycolytic pathway, which catalyzes the reversible isomerization of D-glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate to dihydroxyacetone phosphate. The forward and reverse reactions catalyzed by TIM is pH dependent30. At the active site of TIM, proton transfer from dihydroxyacetone phosphate to glyceraldehyde phosphate is carried out by the carboxylate side-chain of Glu165/16731 and by the imidazole side-chain of His9532.
In comparison to natural enzymes, it is difficult to replicate the complex enzymatic environment for artificial systems. Incorporation of pH-responsive features in artificial supramolecular systems, pH-triggered catalytic activity can be realized33,34,35,36,37,38. However, pH-induced switching of catalytic activity due to aggregation/dissociation of supramolecular systems remains relatively unexplored. In an example, Zhang et al.39 reported pH-switchable artificial hydrolase activity, where a catalytic histidine residue was introduced at the edge of a pH-responsive peptide, VK2H (Fig. 2a). By changing pH from acidic to alkaline, the peptide exhibited a conformational transition from random coil to β-sheet. The β-sheet self-assembled to long fibrils, where histidine residues extended in an ordered array as an effective catalytic microenvironment. The fibrils showed significant esterase activity by catalyzing the hydrolysis of p-nitrophenyl acetate (pNPA) (kinetic efficiency = 19.18 s−1 M−1) in tris-HCl buffer (Table 1, Entry 1). The role of histidine as catalytic site was confirmed by replacing histidine residue of the peptide with glycine (VK2G), which self-assembled into fibrils, but with much reduced catalytic activity. Besides, the peptide formed a hydrogel at higher concentrations, which is also catalytically active. In the self-assembled form, the histidine residues were exposed on the edges of the fibril, which provided the active site for substrate binding. Switchable catalytic activity was realized by pH-induced disassembly of the fibrils into random coils. Changing the pH between acidic (pH 6.0) and basic (pH 9.0), the phase behavior can be reversibly realized from gel to fluid, where the unassembled random coils were catalytically inactive.
Employing amphiphilic molecule, pH-Induced modulation of catalytic activity of a supramolecular system was demonstrated by Arlegui et al.40 (Fig. 2b). In this example, supramolecular system showed catalytically inactivity in aggregated state of the amphiphile, whereas catalytic activity was realized at dissociated state. The catalytic activity of cyclic secondary amine was demonstrated in an amphiphilic meso-(4-sulfonatophenyl)porphyrin derivative by adjusting the homogeneity of the aqueous solutions via pH change. In neutral aqueous solutions, the highly soluble free-base form of the porphyrin derivative showed enamine-based organocatalysis. In contrast, the porphyrin core was protonated under acidic conditions, and led to the formation of self-assembled structures. The protonation of the central pyrroleninic core at acidic pH (typically below pH 4.8) induced the formation of J-aggregates, which was stabilized by ion-pair contacts between the cationic porphyrin centers and the peripheral anionic sulfonate groups. As a result, porphyrin-based pyrrolidine derivatives flocculate and the catalytic activity is fully suppressed. There is no aldol product formation even after 8 days at acidic pH (pH = 3.6) (Table 1, Entry 8). In comparison, the catalysis of the aldol reaction between cyclohexanone and p-nitrobenzaldehyde (pNB) took place by isoindoline moiety with excellent yield (99%) and selectivity (93:7 anti:syn mixture of the aldol products) in the solution of higher pH value (pH = 6.7). However, at acidic pH, the catalyst aggregates can be easily separated from the reaction products via centrifugation. Thereafter, neutralization and desalting could provide the sulfonated amine-porphyrin hybrids, which retains their catalytic activity, and can be reused. Though, there is a substantial decrease of catalytic activity after few cycles.
Besides aldol reaction, isoindoline-functionalized amphiphilic porphyrin derivative was employed for Michael reaction between cyclohexanone and 2-nitrostyrene. However, poor yield (23%) of Michael adduct was reported even after three days in the solution of higher pH value, whereas no conversion was reported at lower pH value (Table 1, Entry 16). Nevertheless, the aggregation state of amphiphilic porphyrin derivatives and their catalytic activity can be controlled by means of pH stimulus. It is worth noting that self-assembled state of supramolecular systems can switch catalysis ‘on’ or ‘off’ depending on availability of suitable active-site microenvironment for the reactant(s) and favorable effect of the system to access the active-site for catalysis. For example, cooperative effect favors pNPA hydrolysis39 in self-assembled state of V2K2H, whereas self-assembled state of amphiphilic porphyrin derivative40 flocculates and therefore substrates of aldol reaction cannot access the catalytic sites, resulting switching ‘off’ the catalysis.
Polymeric materials, in response to pH stimuli, can undergo structural and/or property change, such as surface activity, chain conformation, solubility41. Immobilization of organocatalyst moiety within such polymer scaffolds may result in formation of aggregates with desired microenvironment, where efficient and selective organic reactions could be possible42. In this regard, proline is used as one of the popular organocatalyst that facilitate chemical transformations similar to type 1 aldolase enzyme catalysis43,44. Proline-catalyzed aldol product can be formed in the hydrophobic microenvironment through an enamine mechanism, where water content at the catalytic site has an impact on the selectivity of the final product. Higher reaction rates and improved (stereo)selectivity could be obtained in the presence of small amount of water, whereas high water concentration can significantly lower the conversions and selectivities19,45. Moreover, proline functionalized with nonpolar moieties demonstrated the importance of hydrophobic environment for proline-catalyzed aldol reaction46,47. Proline can be anchored to polymer scaffolds for asymmetric aldol reactions with a range of ketones and aldehydes in aqueous environment48,49. In one example, Prado et al.50 employed an amphoteric alternating copolymers of hydrophobic phenylmaleimide and hydrophilic vinylpyrrolidone for supporting L-proline-catalyzed aldol reaction in aqueous buffer solution (Table 1, Entry 9). It is reported that near the isoelectric point (IEP) of the polymer (around pH 4), an aggregated form of the polymer scaffold favored the formation of high enantioselective product (91% yield, 81% ee). This high enantioselectivity is attributed to the exclusion of water from the polymer aggregates, resulting stabilization of the transition state. In contrast, the hydrophilicity of the aggregates increased at higher pH (pH 7). The asymmetric aldol reaction could be observed (with 99% yield), but reduced the enantioselectivity (2% ee). This is attributed to presence of high water concentration at the active center that influenced the transition state. Thus, control over the polymer aggregates and aggregation-induced selectivity of aldol product could be realized in response to pH change in aqueous environment. Likewise, Tang et al.51 reported L-proline-functionalized pH-responsive block copolymer for asymmetric aldol reaction in water. In this study, a series of block copolymers were employed having L-proline as catalyst moiety, poly(diethylaminoethylmethacrylate) (PDEA) as pH-responsive segment, and methyl polyethylene glycol (mPEG) as hydrophilic moiety (Fig. 2c). Catalytic activity and stereoselectivity of these copolymer catalysts were examined for asymmetric aldol reaction between pNB and cyclohexanone at different pH values (pH = 4.0, pH = 7.0) (Table 1, Entry 10). The result indicated that catalytic activity and stereoselectivity can be affected by the pH value of aqueous solution and the structures of copolymer catalyst assemblies. At acidic pH (pH = 4.0), PDEA fragment of copolymers became hydrophilic due to protonation of amine group and displayed smaller hydrodynamic sizes (~20 nm), poor yield (26%), and selectivity (37% ee). At pH 7.0 (close to the pKa value), copolymer self-assembled to hydrophobic PDEA core and hydrophilic mPEG corona. At this pH (pH 7.0), suitable ratio of hydrophilic to hydrophobic segment of the aggregate effectively attracted substrates to the catalytic sites and avoided large amount of water near the catalytic active center, which can disturb the transition state52. The catalytic activity and selectivity of aldol product (75% yield and 89% ee) were increased. However, larger hydrodynamic size (~220 nm) at basic pH (pH = 9.0) indicated the deprotonation of the amine groups leading to more hydrophobic PDEA blocks and less yield of aldol product (59%). Therefore, modulation in chemical conversion and selectivity can be observed by adjusting suitable ratio of hydrophilic to hydrophobic segment of a polymeric material by varying pH.
Besides assemblies in polymeric or supramolecular systems, heterogeneous catalysts have been used for organic transformations due to their site-specific selectivity, minimized metal trace in reaction medium, recyclability, and ease in product separation53,54. Among them, core–shell microstructures with inorganic cores and organic shells have been employed for controlled catalysis in aqueous environments55. For example, Zhang et al.56 employed pH-responsive core–shell microstructures for Suzuki reaction in aqueous media. In this example, Pd nanoparticles (Pd-NPs) were embedded in the shell layer of polystyrene-co-poly[2-methacrylic acid 3-bis(carboxymethylamino)-2-hydroxypropyl ester] (PS-co-PGMA-IDA). The fabricated structures were stable in basic aqueous solution (pH > 7), and can activate aryl boronic acid to form biaryl product with aryl halides at room temperature (Table 1, Entry 17). High yield of biaryls (>85%) was achieved for hydrophilic substrates, however, poor yield (<30%) was obtained for hydrophobic substrates. Moreover, at lower pH, the core–shell structure was destabilized via protonation of the methacrylate part of the copolymer. This resulted in decrease in reaction rate by restricting access to the Pd particles. Thus, employing Pd-NP fabricated PS-co-PGMA-IDA, the Suzuki reaction in aqueous environment could be switched ‘on’ and ‘off’ by adjusting the pH of the medium. In this way, accessibility of suitable confined environment for an organic reaction can be controlled by changing pH of the solution. Likewise, core–shell microstructures involving Au-NPs for switchable catalysis was demonstrated by Xiao et al.57, where Au-NPs were enveloped by an interpenetrating gel network of methylenebisacrylamide and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) (Table 1, Entry 18). At higher pH (pH > 6), shrinkage of the gel structures occurred due to deprotonation of —COOH group of methacrylate, resulting reduced hydrogen bonding and drainage of water molecules from the core. As a consequence, it closed the diffusion gateways for the reactants for catalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol with the help of NaBH4 (rate of reaction, K = 1.0 × 10−1 min−1 at pH 9.2). In comparison, PVP developed hydrogen bonding with methacrylate groups at lower pH, which permitted the reactants to come in close proximity of the Au-centers, resulting successful reduction reaction (rate of reaction, K = 6.1 × 10−1 min−1 at pH 5.0). Thus, pH-responsive NP-based catalytic systems can be created by combining organic ligands and metal-based NPs58.
Catalytic system with Pickering emulsion (PE) provides a distinct platform, which can perform more than traditional catalysis technology59. Generally, PE, composed of aqueous-organic biphasic system stabilized by solid particles, can compartmentalize droplets to control the chemical process in response to stimulus, as well as the isolation or protection of incompatible reagents and the sensitive species that can be easily affected by the harsh reaction conditions60,61. PE-based systems with control over wettability and interfacial tension of emulsions can provide switchable PE-based catalysts (vide infra). pH-responsive PE-based catalytic systems utilize sub-micrometer-sized particles having functional groups that can protonate/deprotonate upon pH change, resulting pH-regulated wettability of the systems. In an example, Yang et al.62 reported an in situ preparation method of sub-micrometer size solid catalysts for hydrogenation of styrene via tuning the pH value of solution (Fig. 2d). In this example, hairy silica microspheres were fabricated with a mixture of hydrophilic, pH-sensitive (MeO)3SiC3H6(NHC2H4)2NH2 and relatively hydrophobic (MeO)3Si(CH2)7CH3 via covalent linkage. Pd-NPs were deposited onto these hairy silica microspheres. This way, interfacially active and pH-responsive solid catalyst was formulated in an organic (toluene)/aqueous biphasic system. The protonation and deprotonation via pH change make the catalyst surface hydrophilic/hydrophobic, resulting switchable emulsion. The system formed an oil-in-water (o/w) emulsion at low pH (pH 3.0 to pH 4.0) due to protonation of triamine-functional group on the surface. In these o/w emulsion, hydrophobic styrene moieties clustered inside the oil droplets. The system availed the favorable conditions for hydrogenation reaction of styrene to ethylbenzene (99% yield) due to the location of the catalyst particles at the interface of the emulsion droplets (Table 1, Entry 20). In contrary, the system is converted to a water-in-oil (w/o) emulsion by increasing the pH value (pH 7.0 to 8.0), where triamine-functional group deprotonated and become hydrophobic. As a result, Pd-NPs of the silica microsphere cannot be accessed by the substrate as it prefers the oil phase, and therefore, the reaction was terminated. The surface of these particles, this way, can be switched between hydrophilic/hydrophobic via protonation or deprotonation by pH change. Moreover, the catalysts can be recycled many times without significant loss of activity. Likewise, pH-switchable catalytic microreactors based on PE were also reported for the reduction of p-nitroanisole with NaBH463,64.
Temperature-induced switchable catalytic systems
Temperature is an important stimulus for enzyme catalysis as the rate of enzyme catalytic reactions depends on temperature65. Reactions, catalyzed by enzymes, generally stop at higher temperature due to enzyme denaturation. Temperature-responsive artificial switchable catalyst systems have been developed mostly based on temperature-responsive polymers fastened to a catalytic active segment. The temperature-responsive behavior is observed when the temperature is fluctuated around lower critical solution temperature (LCST) of a polymer66,67,68,69. Depending on the hydrophobic and hydrophilic nature of polymer chain above or below of LCST, the catalytic activity of these polymer materials can be switched ‘on’ and ‘off’ by obtaining a suitable microenvironment for chemical reactions via adjustment in temperature (vide infra). Moreover, employing such polymers as a carrier for metal nanoparticles, nanoreactors have been achieved with the control over catalytic activity just by changing temperature. With respect to temperature-responsiveness, these nanoreactors are broadly classified into two categories—(a) positive temperature-responsive nanoreactors, which deswell at lower temperature, and (b) negative temperature-responsive nanoreactors, which deswell at higher temperature.
Positive thermoresponsive nanoreactors are generally designed in such a way that they show the catalytic activity at elevated temperature. Polymeric micelles have been employed as positive thermoresponsive nanoreactors because of their distinct core–shell structure with confined hydrophobic core domain70,71. In an example, Zayas et al.72 reported a temperature-induced switchable micellar nanoreactor for asymmetric aldol reaction in water. In the nanoreactor, L-proline was attached with a block copolymer having a permanently hydrophilic block [poly(dimethylacrylamide), PDMA], and a thermoresponsive block [poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAm)] (Fig. 3a). Above the LCST (ranging from 25 to 40 °C) of the polymer, the PNIPAM block became hydrophobic that resulted in micelles of ~15–20 nm in diameter, where the L-proline moiety located within the hydrophobic PNIPAm core. In this way, L-proline moieties in the nanoreactor obtain an ideal hydrophobic environment for catalysis (Table 1, Entry 11). The reactions were efficient at high temperature (50 °C) with excellent yields (95%) and enantioselectivity (96% ee). In contrast, lowering the temperature (below the LCST of the polymer) resulted disassembly of the nanoreactors to water-soluble polymers, and reduction in aldol product formation (53% yield at 25 °C). However, the aldol product was precipitated in ice bath and could be isolated by centrifugation. The aqueous solution of polymer could be reused for next catalytic cycle via reformation of the nanoreactors by increasing the temperature above LCST. Likewise, nanorecators have been realized via immobilizing different organocatalysts, such as imidazole73 for hydrolysis of pNPA (Table 1, Entry 2), L-prolineamide74 for aldol reaction (Table 1, Entry 12) with thermoresponsive polymers in water.
Catalytic system with microgel can offer an attractive platform as microgels are porous particles consisting of a cross-linked polymeric network, and can form colloidally-stable dispersions in water75. By changing temperature, substrates could diffuse through the porous network during swelling in water and can access the catalyst embedded in the network, whereas the molecules would be trapped inside the microstructure during deswelling. Thus, modulation in catalysis can be achieved via temperature-induced swelling/deswelling of microgels. In an example, Tan et al.76 reported a temperature-responsive selenium-modified poly(N-vinylcaprolactam) microgel as glutathione peroxidase (GPx) mimic. Diselenide bonds inside the microgel was converted to seleninic acid through oxidation by H2O2 and used as colloidal catalyst for acrolein oxidation to acrylic acid (Table 1, Entry 22). The catalysis was ‘on’ (yield > 91%) at higher temperature (50 °C), whereas at lower temperature (20 °C) the catalysis was ‘off’ and microgel can be removed from the product. However, a substantial decrease in the yield of acrylic acid was reported in consecutive cycles, which is ascribed to higher viscosity of the reaction mixture leading to the deterioration of the diffusion process.
Negative temperature-responsive nanoreactors consisting PNIPAm fragment are often homogeneous below the LCST and can act as an efficient catalyst, whereas above LCST, they form globules, and become a heterogeneous system which shows poor catalytic activity77,78,79. For example, Kuepfert et al.80 demonstrated proline-functionalized negative thermoresponsive nanoreactor for aldol reaction in water with efficient catalysis and enantioselectivity (Fig. 3b). In this example, nanoreactors were prepared from proline-functionalized 2-oxazoline-based bottlebrush copolymers, in which the length of 2-oxazoline portion could be adjusted for tunable catalytic activities. Attachment of the proline along the bottlebrush copolymers created a hydrophobic core having the catalyst moiety and a thermoresponsive shell. Upon self-assembly of these bottlebrush copolymers in an aqueous solution, micellar nanoreactor system was generated that catalyze the asymmetric aldol reaction. The micellar nanoreactors exhibit tunable catalytic activity as a function of temperature. The modulation in hydrophobic behavior of the bottlebrush polymer affects the diffusion of substrate molecules to the core. At lower temperature (below the cloud point, Tcp), proline fragment of the polymer can catalyze the aldol reaction between pNB and cyclohexanone (Table 1, Entry 13) with good conversions (up to 97%) and stereoselectivities (up to 96% ee). In contrary, poor selectivity of the aldol product (12% ee at 80 °C) was obtained at higher temperature. It is proposed that the polymer chain collapse from hydrophilic coils to hydrophobic globules at higher temperature (above Tcp) resulting enhancement of water diffusion to the catalytic sites that inhibit the formation of stabilized transition state. However, at intermediate temperatures, higher stereoselectivity of the aldol product was observed, which indicated the dependency of water diffusion to the catalytic sites of the micellar nanoreactor is a function of temperature, and selectivity of the aldol product could be modulated via changing temperature. Likewise, thermoresponsive nanoreactor has been realized via immobilizing 4-(dimethylamino) pyridine (DMAP)81 for acylation reaction in water (Table 1, Entry 23).
Employing a negative-thermoresponsive hydrogel-based material, He et al.82 reported a seminal study about temperature-responsive ‘on/off’ switch for organic reactions. In this example, catalyst moiety was engineered to the tips of an epoxy microstructure via either physical adsorption or chemical covalent attachment process. The resulting assembled system was embedded within temperature-responsive hydrogel PNIPAm, which shows negative temperature-responsive behavior. The system was immersed in a liquid bilayer of aqueous/organic substance (reagent layer) (Fig. 3c). Employing this design, click reaction between octylazide and phenylacetylene was performed (Table 1, Entry 24). Below the LCST (32 °C, LCST of PNIPAm), the polymer was in its swollen state and the catalyst-functionalized tips could be found intruding into the reagent layer (octylazide and phenylacetylene). Therefore, the reagents can access Cu(PPh3)2NO3 catalyst, which is on the tip of the microstructure, for click reaction. As it is an exothermic reaction, the temperature of the system increased, resulting contraction of the hydrogel above the LCST via expelling water molecules. Thus, the catalyst-bearing microstructure tips were removed from the reagent layer and catalysis was ‘off’ until the temperature changed to the LCST. Accordingly, self-regulated oscillation of catalysis was generated influencing on the LCST of the hydrogel. Besides the click reaction, Ph3CPF6 catalyzed decomposition of cumene hydroperoxide (Table 1, Entry 25), H2PtCl6 catalyzed hydrosilylation reaction between 1-hexene and triethylsilane/diphenylsilane (Table 1, Entry 26) have been successfully performed. By changing the reagent concentration (for controlling the rate of heat generation), the amount of liquid interface, or the microstructure geometry, the temperature oscillations and thereby the catalysis could be finely tuned. These materials are very similar to the living organisms in the sense that they could respond to the changes in their local environment through interconversions of chemical and/or mechanical energy and self-regulating feedback loops83.
Besides temperature-responsiveness, the morphology of the PNIPAm segment of a nanostructure has an impact on the activity of the catalyst, which is generally embedded within the hydrophobic core of the nanostructures. In a study, Lu et al.84 reported a core–shell (CS) and core−shell-corona (CSC) type nanogels based on L-proline-functionalized hydrophobic core within a thermoresponsive PNIPAm shell. CS nanostructure consists a hydrophobic cross-linked core and a temperature-responsive cross-linked shell, while the CSC morphology consists an additional layer where the polymer chains are less cross-linked. Catalytic dependency of the nanostructures on temperature was examined at three temperatures—at 4 °C where PNIPAm is hydrophilic and solvated, at 25 °C where PNIPAm is somewhat hydrophobic, and at 40 °C (above the LCST of PNIPAm) where it is fully hydrophobic and in a collapsed state. For an asymmetric aldol reaction between pNB and cyclohexanone, it was found that the catalytic activity was enhanced with increasing temperature for CS nanogel structures (40% conversion, 86% ee at 4 °C; 88% conversion, 96% ee at 40 °C), whereas a drop in activity was observed at elevated temperatures with CSC nanostructures (66% conversion, 95% ee at 4 °C; 28% conversion, 97% ee at 40 °C). In comparison, the CSC nanogel showed greater catalytic activity than CS nanogel at low temperature (4 °C), which is attributed to the lower-crosslinking density of the CSC nanostructure, resembling the micellar-type morphology and catalytic activity. With increasing temperature of CS nanogel, the collapse of PNIPAm segment resulted in increase of hydrophobic nature of the core and higher catalytic activity, which is presumably due to increase in substrate uptake and the greater mobility of the substrates within the core. In contrast, for CSC nanogel, the substrates were blocked to access the core presumably due to different-type of collapse for less-cross-linked PNIPAm shell. However, both systems, irrespective of the yields, showed high enantioselectivity for aldol product formation.
Exploiting thermoresponsive behavior of PNIPAm-based materials, metal NPs were entrapped into the polymeric network for the catalysis of various reactions in water85,86,87,88,89. In these systems, metal NPs were stabilized by micelle forming amphiphilic block copolymers, and have been employed for a range of catalytic reactions such as hydrogenations, oxidations, reductions, and coupling reactions90,91,92. An interpolymer interaction between the components at lower temperature and disruption of the interpolymer interaction at higher temperature result in this temperature-responsive dynamic nanoreactor system93,94,95. However, colloidal nature of the catalytic sites and the challenges associated with the reversibility of catalyst activity and recycling limit, the use of these type of nanoreactors require further development96.
Pickering emulsion (PE)-based catalytic system was reported by Dong et al.97, which exhibited catalysis of dechlorination reaction as a function of temperature. In this example, PNIPAM was linked with UiO-66 (a nano-sized metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), where UiO-66 is an archetypal MOFs98) emulsifier, where Pd nanoparticles (Pd-NPs) were incorporated to create a multicomponent composite emulsifier (Fig. 4a). The system was stabilized with toluene-in-water PE and supported biphasic dechlorination reaction of chlorobenzenes (Table 1, Entry 27). Ammonium formate was used as the reducing agent. At 25 °C (below the LCST of polymer which is 32 °C), hydrophilic PNIPAm brushes stabilized the emulsions, and promoted interfacial catalytic activity of Pd-NPs for dechlorination of chlorobenzene derivatives. In comparison, at an elevated temperature (45 °C, above the LCST of polymer), PE system was demulsified as the PNIPAM brushes become hydrophobic and began to compact on the surface of the MOFs. It resulted organic and aqueous phase separation, which allowed product isolation from organic phase. Reducing temperature back to 25 °C leads to migration of MOFs to aqueous phase, which could be reused after re-homogenization. Thus, PE-based catalytic system could be switched between ‘on’ and ‘off’ just by varying temperature.
Besides polymer substances, supramolecular hydrogels can act as heterogeneous catalytic system, where reversible covalent self-assembly could be utilized for the development of catalyst systems that can be filtered out after completion of the reaction99,100,101,102,103. These systems are interesting due to having large active surface, tunable catalytic activity, and well-ordered arrangement of catalytic groups, which can result enhanced efficiency. However, in most examples, the aldol reaction between pNB and cyclohexanone has been chosen as benchmark reaction104. Metal nanoparticles can be embedded into supramolecular hydrogel structure and catalytic activity can be switched employing temperature stimulus. In an example, Léger et al.105 developed cyclodextrin-based thermoresponsive hydrogel incorporating catalytically active ruthenium nanoparticles (Ru-NPs) for hydrogenation reactions (Fig. 4b). In this example, Ru-NPs were embedded into a supramolecular hydrogel matrix consisting N-alkylpyridinium amphiphile and α-cyclodextrin (α-CD). In water, the amphiphile and α-CD self-assembled to [3]pseudorotaxane, where the amphiphilic character of pyridinium-derivative was masked via alkyl chain inclusion into the cavities of α-CD, resulting in the formation of a hydrogel. At high temperature, the association constant between α-CD and the amphiphile become sufficiently low, resulting free pyridinium-derivative and α-CD. Therefore, as a supramolecular carrier, α-CD influenced the mass transfer between NPs-containing aqueous phase and substrate-containing organic phase. Above the sol–gel transition temperature (39 °C), the system transformed to sol phase, where the catalytic hydrogenation of terminal alkenes took place (Table 1, Entry 28). The Ru-NPs, stabilized in the hydrogel network, demonstrated a pronounced catalytic activity at 50 °C. In contrast, after cooling the temperature to ambient condition, the system spontaneously returned to the gel state, and showed no catalytic activity. However, the hydrogenated products and catalyst could be easily separated at lower temperature. It is worth noting that the dispersion of Ru-NPs in the hydrogel network remained intact for reuse.
Reversible nature of supramolecular gels by changing the temperature can allow a reversible sol–gel transition and thereby the modulation in catalysis. This type of tunable catalyst may find interesting applications, especially if different stimuli such as light, sound, magnetic field can be used to regulate hydrogel formation and subsequent catalysis.
Light-induced switchable catalytic systems
Light stimulus is advantageous over other stimuli due to its noninvasive nature, easy modulation via monitoring the source, and its precise physicochemical control over reaction106. Photoresponsive processes found in nature illustrate the use of light irradiation for initiating and regulating complex molecular and biochemical processes. Different approaches can be employed in artificial photoresponsive systems107,108,109, including photocatalysis, photoswitchable catalysis. In photocatalysis, upon light irradiation, an inactive precatalyst provides the catalytically active photoexcited state that reacts with a substrate, whereas a catalytically active species undergoes a reversible photochemical transformation in photoswitchable catalysis resulting the change in its intrinsic catalytic properties110. Photoswitchable catalysis offers distinct advantages over photocatalysis as the former provides an extra handle for controlling the catalyst activity. These photoswitchable catalytic systems are generally obtained via incorporating photoactive units in the molecular architecture. Electronic effect, steric effect, cooperative effect are the principal type of effects utilized to achieve control over these systems. In the following, we describe light-triggered switchable catalyst systems for organic transformations in aqueous environments.
Drawing inspiration from light-controlled biochemical process, controlling the catalytic activity via electronic modulation can be achieved. For example, pyridoxal-5-phosphate (PLP), which is biologically active form of vitamin B6, is a versatile enzyme cofactor used by nature for several biosynthetic procedure111. The action of PLP depends on the electronic connection between aldehyde group and pyridinium group. The pyridinium group in the aldimine (formed by the condensation of an amino acid and PLP) enhances the acidity of the α-hydrogen by stabilizing the conjugate base through contributions from the quinonoid structure. A photoresponsive mimic of PLP was demonstrated by Wilson et al.112, where diarylethene photoswitch was replaced in the PLP core ring. In the ring-opened isomer, the pyridinium and aldehyde functional groups were electronically insulated, which precluded catalytic activity (Fig. 5a). On the other hand, irradiation of UV light (λ = 365 nm) provided fully conjugated ring-closed form, where aldehyde and pyridinium groups are electronically connected. Therefore, the ring-closed form provides the stabilized quinonoid structure upon condensation with L-alanine (an amino acid), and deprotonation of the aldimine α-hydrogen. Thus, treatment of L-alanine with ring-opened isomer resulted in poor racemization reaction (3% yield), whereas an increase in the rate of racemization was observed upon UV irradiation to ring-closed form (Table 1, Entry 29). The ability of light-responsive PLP mimic, as a controllable catalyst, was demonstrated employing hydrogen–deuterium exchange experiments in a mixture of D2O and CD3CO2D. Furthermore, reversible switching the catalytic activity between its opened-form (catalysis ‘off’) and its closed-form (catalysis ‘on’) was demonstrated through alternate exposure to UV (λ = 365 nm) and visible light (λ > 490 nm).
The trans → cis isomerization of an azobenzene or stilbene moiety can be used for catalytic purpose in aqueous media enabling steric modulation via large geometrical change due to the isomerization process. In these systems, the active site of the catalyst would be inaccessible to the reactants by a group such as host–guest binding, bulky functional group to shield the catalytic sites. Light-induced isomerization would result the geometrical change and unblocking of catalytic site to the reactants. In an early example, Ueno et al.113 exploited host–guest interactions to modulate the catalytic activity, where β-cyclodextrin (β-CD) acts as host and 4-carboxyazobenzene acts as guest. The azobenzene derivative changes the rate of the hydrolysis of pNPA in tris buffer medium (pH 8.7) (Table 1, Entry 3). Complexation between trans-azobenzene moiety and β-CD effectively block one end of β-CD, resulting inaccessible β-CD for the ester substrate, and thereby inhibition of hydrolysis (rate constant, K = 1.17 × 10−4 S−1 for uncatalyzed reaction). However, upon irradiation of UV light (λ = 365 nm), tans → cis isomerization led to exclusion of cis-azobenzene moiety from β-CD, which resulted inclusion of pNPA in the cavity of β-CD. This facilitates attack of one of the peripheral hydroxyl groups of β-CD on the ester moiety. Therefore, enhancement in the rate of hydrolysis (rate constant, K = 1.56 × 10−4 S−1 for catalyzed reaction) was observed. Moreover, cis-azobenzene moiety can isomerize back to trans-azobenzene moiety utilizing thermal energy or irradiation of visible light, resulting the inhibition in ester hydrolysis rate. Likewise, photoswitchable catalysts were developed based on covalently attached azobenzene moieties to the lower rim of β-CD114. Photocontrolled imidazole catalyzed hydrolysis of esters in phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) was reported by Lee et al.115 employing a functionalized β-CD with an azobenzene unit and a histidine residue (Table 1, Entry 4). In this example, an imidazole group was attached to an azobenzene-based pendant and the catalytic site is unavailable for the ester molecules as trans-azobenzene effectively makes inclusion complex with host cavity of β-CD (Fig. 5b). Conversely, light irradiation results cis-azobenzene, which could not be included in the cavity of β-CD and hence the binding site is available for the insertion of both the ester molecule and imidazole moiety, resulted faster hydrolysis of various ester molecules, namely pNPA (kinetic efficiency = 0.27 s−1 M−1), Boc-L-alanine-p-nitrophenyl ester (kinetic efficiency = 1.0 s−1 M−1) and Boc-D-alanine-p-nitrophenyl ester (kinetic efficiency = 0.96 s−1 M−1). Furthermore, the azobenzene moieties were functionalized to gold nanoparticles (Au-NPs) that bind Zn+2 coordinated β-CD dimer as a heterogeneous photoswitchable system to modulate ester hydrolyses116. Upon complexation, the NPs aggregated and showed poor catalytic activity (rate constant, k = 54.1 × 10−8 M min−1 for trans-isomer). UV light irradiation led to tans → cis isomerization, resulting exclusion of cis-azobenzene moiety from β-CD. NPs deaggregation and enhancement in ester hydrolysis rate were observed (rate constant, k = 132 × 10−8 M min−1 for cis-isomer). These, light-induced switching of catalytic activity is an excellent example with respect to artificial molecular switching systems in aqueous medium.
Regulation of enzyme-like catalytic activity could be achieved in artificial systems by introducing flexible domains in photoswitchable systems for enabling preorganization and induced fit. In an example, Zhao et al.117 reported an artificial photoswitchable hydrolase activity by incorporating an azobenzene group to peptide sequence Gly-Phe-Gly-His (GFGH) (Fig. 6a). The peptide can self-assembled into nanofibers, by which basicity of the imidazole functional group of histidine was enhanced based on the cooperative effects. The hydrophobic microenvironment in the supramolecular assemblies was suitable for the hydrolase-like catalytic activity on pNPA in PBS buffer (pH 7.4) (kinetic efficiency = 13.95 × 10−3 min−1 mM−1 for trans-isomer) (Table 1, Entry 5). Upon UV irradiation, the azobenzene moiety isomerizes to trans → cis conformation, resulting break down of β-sheet nanofibers to random coils and consequent reduction in catalytic efficiency (kinetic efficiency = 11.08 × 10−3 min−1 mM−1 for cis-isomer). This way, the activity of the hydrolase mimic can be switched reversibly employing UV and visible light. However, repeated cycles of activation and deactivation via light irradiation appeared to disturb the supramolecular architecture, and reduction in catalytic ability.
Due to light-induced isomerization process, a change in the distance or orientation of catalytic sites of switchable catalyst can modulate the rate of chemical process118. Artificial photoresponsive glycosidase mimic was reported by Samanta et al.119 employing a photoresponsive bifunctional organocatalyst based on the cooperative effects of azobenzene-functionalized biscarboxylic acid (Fig. 6b). Glycosidase enzyme is responsible for hydrolysis of glycosidic bond between two glucose residues of biopolymers120. One of the carboxyl groups of glycosidases functions as general acid catalyst, whereas other carboxylic group acts as a nucleophile, forming a covalent glycosyl-enzyme intermediate. In the glycosidase mimic, the carboxylic acid groups of trans-azobenzene isomer ionize at roughly same pH, whereas deprotonation of cis-azobenzene isomer, which is obtained via 366 nm light irradiation, occurs in a stepwise fashion and it exists as the monoanionic species between pH 4.7 and 6.5. An increase in the reaction rate of six order was observed with respect to background reaction at pH 5.8 for the hydrolysis of 4-nitrophenyl-β-D-glycopyranoside (kinetic efficiency = 9.2 × 102 mM−1 min−1) (Table 1, Entry 30), which is similar in terms of functionality as the active form of a glycosidase. Moreover, the catalytic activity could be switched ‘on/off’ via altering exposure to UV/visible light.
The carbonic anhydrase (CA) enzymes catalyze the reversible hydration or dehydration of CO2/HCO3−. It consists a distorted tetrahedral Zn(II) complex coordinated to imidazole nitrogen atoms of histidine residues and a water molecule121. Photoresponsive CA enzyme mimic was reported by Saha et al.122 for pNPA hydrolysis, where the CA-activity can be turned ‘on/off’ reversibly by irradiation of light in PBS Buffer (pH = 7.6) (Table 1, Entry 7). This example employed a photoregulated CA mimic with Zn(II) complex of two imidazoles appended azobenzene system. The cis-azobenzene isomer formed a 1:1 complex with Zn(II) ions that showed efficiency as an active-site mimic of the CA enzyme (kinetic efficiency = 0.24 mM−1 min−1). In contrast, the trans-isomer provided a polymeric —(Zn(II)-trans-)— network, which showed poor efficiency towards hydrolysis reaction of pNPA.
Artificial catalysts have the potential for controlling catalysis within self-assembled structures via the combination of cooperativity and self-assembled structure formation. In an example, Ren et al. 123 reported self-assembly of azobenzene-based amphiphilic molecules for creating catalytic pockets utilizing intermolecular cooperative effect that can be switched between ‘on/off’ states via light irradiation. In this example, azobenzene-functionalized 1,4,7-triaza-cyclononane (TACN) derivative self-assembled into vesicular structures in a HEPES buffer solution (pH 7) (Fig. 6c). The molecular assembly can effectively catalyze the transphosphorylation reaction (rate = ~0.5 × 10−8 mol s−1 for trans-isomer) of 2-hydroxypropyl-4-nitrophenylphosphate (HPNPP), which is a model substrate for RNA hydrolysis (Table 1, Entry 31). UV light irradiation (λ = 365 nm) converts trans → cis-isomer, resulting disassembled states and poor catalytic activity (rate = ~0.17 × 10−8 mol s−1 for cis-isomer). Moreover, conversion of cis → trans-isomer and thereby the assembled state could be obtained via light irradiation from a white LED lamp. Thus, light irradiation within the amphiphilic molecule can allow switching between assembled and disassembled states, thereby modulating the rate of chemical transformations. Likewise, the polarity change in 4-(phenylazo)-benzoate derivative due to light irradiated trans ↔ cis isomerization was utilized by Neri et al.124 for controlling the binding affinity to Au-NPs and thereby their catalytic activity. In this example, the Au-NPs were functionalized with a monolayer of alkyl thiol terminated with aTACN—Zn2+ headgroup, which can catalyze the transphosphorylation of HPNPP in aqueous buffer (pH 7.0) (Table 1, Entry 32). Light-sensitive 4-(phenylazo)-benzoate was used as a cofactor to regulate the catalytic activity of the nanosystem. The catalytic activity was downregulated with the trans-azobenzene derivative which was attributed to its higher binding affinity to the catalyst. In contrast, the cis-azobenzene derivative disfavored its hydrophobic binding with the apolar part of the Au-NP-attached monolayer due to the increased polarity, and increased the reaction rate up to 1.5-fold. Although several operational limitations of this system were reported, but reversible formation of cooperative catalysts within a dynamic self-assembled system is a promising new tool for the design of complex artificial systems in aqueous environment.
Self-aggregation of NPs could provide suitable hydrophobic inert environment amidst surrounding aqueous medium125,126. In a seminal work, Zhao et al.127 described novel class of synthetic confined environments, whose formation and disassembly are governed by light irradiation. In this example, azobenzene-functionalized Au-NPs were used for reversibly creating and destroying confined environments (‘nanoflasks’), where trapped molecules can undergo chemical reactions with increased rates (Fig. 7a). Upon UV light irradiation, trans → cis isomerization of azobenzene moiety paves the pathway for aggregation of the NPs and formation of nanoflasks where reaction rate increases. Afterwards, exposure of visible light results cis → trans isomerization and subsequent disintegration of the ‘nanoflasks’ assuring product recovery at the desired yield. Acid-catalyzed hydrolysis of acetal to aldehyde in water-saturated toluene in presence of functionalized Au-NPs was investigated (Table 1, Entry 35). The reaction was observed to have proceeded at much higher rates as compared to that in absence of the aggregates or UV irradiation.
Azobenzene photoswitches were employed in regulating the stabilization of Pickering emulsions (PEs) and catalysis in such systems. In an example, Li et al.128 reported light-induced emulsification and demulsification of ionic liquid surfactants for catalytic hydrogenation of styrene (Fig. 7b). The PE was stabilized by silica microspheres functionalized with surface-loaded Pd and water-soluble azobenzene-based ionic liquid surfactant (ILS). Catalytic system Pd/SiO2/ILS was found to actively participate in catalytic hydrogenation of styrene with excellent conversion at ambient condition (Table 1, Entry 21). Upon UV light irradiation, trans→cis isomerization of azobenzene moiety resulted increase in hydrophilicity of ILS and decrease of surface activity, consequently destabilization of emulsion. A complete phase separation of aqueous phase and organic phase provided poor rate of catalytic reaction, but ease of product separation. Moreover, irradiation of visible light to the system, followed by homogenization, reformed the stable PE for reuse. Thus, PE can be used as a microreactor, which allowed controlled catalytic reaction, product separation, and catalyst recycling just via alternate exposure to UV and visible-light irradiation.
Light-induced reversible change in wettability of TiO2 surfaces has been utilized in photoswitchable heterogeneous catalysis. In presence of UV light, water molecule (present in moisture) can coordinate with the titanium atom of a TiO2 surface, which resulted increase in number of –OH groups, and the hydrogen bonding ability of the surface129. Thus, the number of –OH groups of a surface could be modulated via UV light irradiation and keeping in the dark. Various hydrogen bond catalyzed organic reactions were observed on these surfaces, including epoxide ring-openings (33–38% yield under UV irradiation, whereas 0–9% yield in dark), cycloadditions (54–76% yield under UV irradiation, whereas 30–34% yield in dark), and C–C forming reactions (64% yield under UV irradiation, whereas 18% yield in dark). The reversible wettability was also employed for switching the rate of aldol reaction between benzaldehyde and acetophenone. Thus, a broad range of C–C bond-forming chemical reactions could be modulated by using heterogeneous catalysts, such as TiO2 via light irradiation.
Small molecule-induced switchable catalytic systems
Self-assembly of amphiphilic molecules in water can provide nano- or microstructures such as micelles, vesicles, and emulsions, which can be used as nanoreactors by offering suitable reaction space from the environment130,131,132,133. However, controlling and regulating these nanoreactors dynamically and reversibly employing small molecules is a great challenge.
Compressed CO2 can trigger the formation of nanoreactors such as nanoemulsion. Reversibility between micelle-to-vesicle transitions can be controlled by regulating the pressure of CO2 and eventually the activity and selectivity of a catalyst. Qin et al.134 employed a proline-based amphiphilic molecule (PTC12, Fig. 8a) having a long alkyl chain at the C-terminus to form vesicle under compressed CO2. The peptide-based amphiphilic PTC12 was insoluble in water. However, upon introduction of compressed CO2, PTC12 formed bicarbonate salt that increases the hydrophilicity of PTC12 and consequently facilitates the formation of vesicular assembly in water. The hydrogen bonds between amide functionality among head groups reduced the surface area per surfactant headgroup, resulting the formation of vesicles. Besides, compressed CO2 regulated the size of the vesicles via inserting CO2 into the hydrophobic area of the packed amphiphiles. The vesicle structures can catalyze a direct aldol reaction with high selectivity (99% yield, 93% ee) (Table 1, Entry 14). Moreover, the nanostructures were regulated by the presence of CO2, providing a dynamic regulation of the system where the catalyst activity and selectivity can be controlled. The amphiphilic proline derivative could be reused to form the vesicles for catalyzing the reaction. Such process could be done several times just via alternate exposure of CO2 to the system or by removing CO2 from the system. This is an interesting example that bridge the gap between random and unstable catalytic emulsion systems and the ordered and stable catalytic hydrogels via employing small molecule such as CO2.
Nature has evolved suitable pathways for controlling the hydrolysis of phosphate diesters in important biomolecules such as DNA and RNA. Many of the enzymes, such as P1 nuclease, DNA polymerase I, phospholipase C, and alkaline phosphatase, depend on the synergistic action of two metal centers (typically Zn2+) for promoting the hydrolytic cleavage of the phosphate diester bonds135,136. In artificial systems, allosteric control over switchable catalysis has emerged in recent years via the use of (nano)mechanical reorganizations137,138,139. In an example, Yoon et al.140 described a switchable catalytic system having Zn(II)-pyridine-bisimine catalytic motifs. The system can undergo reversible switching triggered by the addition or removal of chloride ion (Cl−) and carbon monoxide (CO) in a pseudo-aqueous solution (Table 1, Entry 33). The hydrolysis of HPNP (Fig. 8b) could be turned ‘on/off’ in the networked system employing a metalation/demetalation protocol, where weak-link approach (WLA)141 is exploited. No conversion was observed in the closed state of the catalyst (catalysis ‘off’), while the open state led to full conversion (catalysis ‘on’). The absence of activity in the ‘off’ state was ascribed to the short distance between Zn atoms that inhibited the bimetallic intramolecular reaction. On the other hand, the presence of monodentate ligands (CO or Cl−) at rhodium (Rh) centers allowed a switch to a flexible semi-open form as ‘on’ state from a rigid-closed form as ‘off’ state. The semi-open structure can be switched back to the rigid-closed form just by removal of these monodentate ligands.
Artificial synergistic catalysis, combining two cocatalysts in close proximity, work in concert for carrying out a reaction, which could not be possible emloying either cocatalyst alone142. Recently, Pimentel et al.143 demonstrated DNA-based scaffold for switchable synergistic catalysis through tuning the geometric relationship between the cocatalysts (Cu and 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl [TEMPO]) for oxidation of naphthalenemethanol in aqueous borate buffer (pH 9.5) medium (1/1 borate buffer/acetonitrile) (Table 1, Entry 36). In this example, DNA-cocatalyst conjugates were prepared via bioconjugation of two cocatalysts (Cu and TEMPO) to the end of a DNA helix (Fig. 8c). DNA duplex was obtained via self-assembly of DNA-cocatalyst conjugates that shows much better catalytic activity compared to unscaffolded cocatalysts (without DNA duplex). This is due to the precise placement of the cocatalysts in the DNA duplex. Moreover, the DNA backbone allowed the switching of catalytic activity exploiting a strand-displacement approach. A dynamic DNA structure was created just by incorporating a hairpin motif into the sequence of one of the cocatalyst conjugates. In presence of a trigger sequence, complementary to the hairpin motif, the structure opens up, where distance between the cocatalysts is increased. As a result, synergistic catalysis is turned ‘off’. When a corresponding antitrigger sequence is added, the original catalyst conformation can be restored via formation of dsDNA as by product, and catalytic activity could be restored. The DNA-scaffolded cocatalysts exhibited activity in the oxidation of 6-methoxy-2-naphthalenemethanol (a fluorogenic probe). Thus, synergistic catalytic activity can be controlled through conformational switching of DNA triggered by chemical stimuli. Regulation of enzyme activity in response to environmental conditions is critical to many metabolic functions. Mimicking enzyme regulatory of nature, scientists are creating artificial nanoreactors for potential applications ranging from diagnostics to the production of artificial (smart) materials144,145,146. On this regard, chemistries involving protein–DNA conjugation provide the precession in positing proteins and other biomolecules on DNA scaffolds to modulate intermolecular interactions and the local environment147,148,149.
In nature, living systems have complex dissipative cellular networks, where advanced functions such as adaptability, responsiveness are feasible through energy consumption. Likewise, artificial dissipative chemical systems, which is out-of-equilibrium assemblies require inputs of energy in the form of chemical fuels150,151,152,153,154 or light155,156 to stay in a functional state. Out-of-equilibrium state of a synthetic molecular machine can be used to control catalysis157. In an interesting work, Maiti et al.158 demonstrated transient availability of vesicular nanoreactor for enhancing the rate of a nucleophilic aromatic substitution reaction. Assembly of the vesicle nanorecator was driven by the electrostatic complexation of anionic adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to a cationic surfactant, whereas potato apyrase enzyme hydrolyses ATP to adenosine monophosphate (AMP) leading to breakdown of the formed vesicles. The transient presence of the vesicles was used as nanoreactor to accelerate the reaction rate between 4-chloro-7-nitrobenzofurazan and 1-octanethiol in HEPES buffer (pH 7) as it provides suitable reaction environment, however, there is no catalyst is involved. In contrast, there is no effect on the reaction in presence of only the cationic surfactant or just ATP. This system could in principle be applied for many chemical reactions, because the only requirement is the hydrophobicity of the reactants159. Small biomolecule, such as ATP-induced temporal control over chemical reactivity in artificial synthetic system provided the dissipative catalyst systems as the basis for many events in biology157,160,161,162,163. In another example, Biagini et al.164 reported a molecular machine where rotaxane can be transiently changed from a catalytically inactive form into an active state by CCl3CO2H. Deprotonation by the rotaxane helped decarboxylation of the acid group, thereby bringing the system to its original state and stopping catalysis. However, the system works in organic solvent (CH2Cl2 or toluene). Recently, van der Helm et al.165 reported cucurbit[7]uril (CB[7]) as a supramolecular host to encapsulate aniline (catalyst molecule) in an aqueous environment, which can be released via addition of hydrolytically unstable esters as chemical fuel (Fig. 8d). Addition of glycine betaine methyl ester, as chemical fuel, resulted favorable binding toward CB[7], leading to expulsion of aniline from the cavity of CB[7]. In phosphate buffer (pH 7.5), aniline catalyzed hydrazone formation reaction between 2-formylbenzenesulfonate and a hydrazide derivative to form hydrazone product (Table 1, Entry 38). However, since the ester molecules are unstable under aqueous condition, they hydrolyze to corresponding acid and methanol, which are nonbonding to the cavity of CB[7]. As a result, aniline rebinds in the host cavity of CB[7], and switching ‘off’ the catalysis. Availability of aniline for catalyzing the reaction depends on the lifetime of ester molecule in aqueous environment. Thus, transient presence of a chemical fuel that can bind to a supramolecular host and expel a catalyst, can turn ‘on’ catalysis. An advantage of such catalytic system is that it could, in principle, be applied for many chemical reactions by altering the structure of catalyst and chemical fuel of different concentrations.
Electrochemical-switchable catalytic reactions
Application of electrochemical methods for synthesis of organic compounds in aqueous medium are very appealing from both an economic and an ecological point of view166,167. Electrochemical-induced activation/deactivation of inorganic and organic hybrid nanomaterials is a promising strategy as enzyme mimic for chemical transformations of organic molecules168. However, it is challenging to regulate these systems reversibly in aqueous environments. Au-NPs have been used for catalysis of transphosphorylation of HPNPP, which is a model compound used for mimicking RNA hydrolysis169. Employing electrochemical input, della Sala et al.170 reported reversible activation and deactivation of Au-NP-based supramolecular nanocatalyst in aqueous buffer (HEPES buffer, pH = 7.0). In this example, Au-NPs were covered with C9-thiols terminating with TACN head group and electrochemical controlled association/dissociation of metal ions have been used as a regulatory mechanism for catalysis (Fig. 9a). The electrochemical input in the form of oxidation potential generated Cu(II) coordinated Au-NP, which can switch on the transphosphorylation of HPNPP (Table 1, Entry 34). In contrast, application of reductive potential resulted Cu2+ → Cu0 conversion and redeposition onto the electrode surface. This provided copper-free Au-NP (inactive catalyst) to switch ‘off’ transphosphorylation of HPNPP. Likewise, electrochemistry can be used as effective and clean tool for the regulation of the catalytic activity of a supramolecular catalyst.
Other stimuli-induced switchable catalytic systems
Multi stimuli-switchable systems in aqueous environments provide smart tunability in catalytic activity for organic transformations. In this regard, conjugated polymers, metal-organic frameworks have been employed by attaching stimuli-responsive functional groups for photocatalytic reactions in aqueous media171,172. In an example, Zhang et al.173 employed conjugated poly(bisthiophene) (PBT) for photocatalytic oxidation of 2-furoic acid into 5-hydroxy-2(5H)-furanone in aqueous medium (Table 1, Entry 39). In this example, PBT was functionalized with diethylamine (DEA), which is hydrophobic in nature. On introducing CO2 in the system, carbonic acid was generated and solubilized in aqueous medium, which can successfully perform visible-light-induced catalytic reactions (Fig. 9b). On purging the system with nitrogen, CO2 desorbs from the system and turns the polymeric segment back to its hydrophobic nature that stops the reaction and can be utilized to separate the product. Therefore, product formation is only feasible in presence of light and CO2 stimulus. The reversible switchability of polar nature for the polymeric segment in water was used for photocatalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol to 4-aminophenol in presence of NaBH4 (Table 1, Entry 19), and visible-light-induced coupling of caffeine and aryldiazonium tetrafluoroborate as radical-mediated arylation of heteroarene (Table 1, Entry 40).
Application of magnetic field for controlled organocatalysis in water is scare. However, magnetic materials (nanoparticles) functionalized with organocatalysts have been employed for various organic transformations in aqueous environments due to their easy recovery and reuse174,175. In such systems, the magnetic core provides a magnetic function and the functionalized shell participates in catalysis. An interesting example exploiting thermoresponsive behavior of PNIPAM was described by Wang et al.176, where proline-based nanohybrid was prepared by grafting thermoresponsive PNIPAM fragment and magneto-sensitive vinyl modified Fe3O4@SiO2. In this example, PNIPAM fragment remained in dissolved state below the LCST (38 °C) due to the hydrophilic nature of PNIPAM and therefore catalytically inactive. In contrast, the PNIPAM turned hydrophobic at a higher temperature, resulting the nanohybrid aggregation to ‘broom-type’ corona that provided the hydrophobic microenvironment for catalyzing the aldol reaction of cyclohexanone and pNB (94% yield, 95% ee) (Table 1, Entry 15). Thereafter, magnetic responsiveness allowed to recover the nanohybrid material from the reaction mixture by application of an external magnetic field. Likewise, magnetic- and CO2-dual-responsive Pickering emulsion (PE)-based catalyst system was reported by Tang et al.177 employing Fe3O4 and DEA, which provides a switchable catalytic platform for the benzyl alcohol oxidation. Catalytic system was prepared by introducing DEA for CO2 responsiveness, Fe3O4 for magnetic responsiveness, and tetramethyl-4-piperidylmethacrylat (TMPM) as TEMPO precursor. As a biphasic reaction, the Anelli system (NaClO/NaBr/TEMPO)178 was employed for benzyl alcohol oxidation in water-in-oil PE. This catalyst system provided full conversion for benzyl alcohol (Table 1, Entry 37) and excellent yields (>94%) for other aromatic alcohols (diphenylmethanol, 2-phenylethanol, 4-nitrobenzyl alcohol) and aliphatic alcohols (cyclohexanol, 1-nonanol, 1-hexanol). Thereafter, bubbling of CO2 resulted protonation of the tertiary amino groups. As a consequence, demulsification happened due to formation of relatively hydrophilic tertiary amino groups, which desorbed from the interface and switching ‘off’ the catalysis. They can be quickly gathered under magnetic field, followed by purging of N2 results deprotonation of the tertiary amine group and formation of PE for reuse. Likewise, use of an external magnetic field provides the magnetic separation as a new way for separation of organocatalysts. However, in many examples, magnetic NPs (such as Fe3O4 and γ-Fe2O3) can catalyze a number of organic reactions due to its Lewis acid nature, besides the function as a magnetic core179,180.
Mechanical force could be employed as a stimulus for catalysis181. Generally, mechanical forces are applied in solution through the use of ultrasound182, and in solid state via collisions using milling balls183. However, reversible control over catalytic activity in aqueous environments using this stimulus is scare. Deactivation of catalytic species by generated radical during sonication and the requirement of large macromolecular chain that can be affected during sonication are the major limitations of using this stimulus for control catalytic activity. In addition, water can be only employed in liquid assisted grinding technique of milling ball approach184, but the process is not reversible. Nonetheless, more detailed insights for the mechanisms and processes underlying mechanochemical catalyst (de)activation can contribute to the rational design and implementation of switchable mechanocatalyzed systems in aqueous environments, with their potential use in smart application185.
Conclusion and outlook
In conclusion, this account summarizes the advances in switchable catalytic systems in aqueous medium. Various “nature-like” catalyst systems including supramolecular aggregations, nanoreactors, and molecular catalysts have been enlisted. Taking inspiration from enzymatic activity in aqueous environments, reversible control over artificial catalytic systems for organic transformations has been challenging. However, significant advances have been made in the field of switchable aqueous catalytic systems either via improved catalyst design or via creation of a favorable microenvironment for the catalysis. The later approach is very similar in analogy to the natural enzyme, where hydrophobic pockets provide the optimal chemical environment. Artificial switchable catalysts can alter the reaction rate, selectivity in aqueous environments, but only a handful of organic transformations are successfully tested as benchmark reactions. Limited solubility of the substances and stability of the reaction intermediates are the typical drawbacks for “in water” organic transformations, whereas “on water” reactions can be performed for hydrophobic substances15. However, more strategies for creation of favorable active-site microenvironment via catalysis engineering should be developed, where both hydrophilic and hydrophobic substances can undergo synthetic transformations in aqueous environment, and the catalysis can be switched “on” and ‘off’ in presence/absence of stimuli. Besides, most efforts are concentrated on the invention of new types of switchable catalyst systems incorporating stimuli-responsive unit within their architecture for controlling over the catalytic activity. Moreover, majority of the catalytic systems have modest differences between the catalytic activities of ‘on’ and ‘off’ states of the systems. Although the field is in its infancy, artificial aqueous catalyst system requires development in the catalytic systems that accelerate the rate of reaction in the ‘on’ state and no reaction in the ‘off’ state. Besides, new chemical transformations with wider substrate scope should be tested.
Engineering over aqueous organocatalysis can be expected to grow in the coming years with a further broadening of its applications in biological environments. Besides stimuli-induced control over reaction rate, other characteristics such as substrate/product-selectivity have to be studied in switchable organocatalysis. It is worth noting that each stimulus comes with its own advantages and disadvantages for catalytic systems. As stimulus, temperature is employed mostly for switchable catalytic systems. These systems comprise PNIPAm or other polymers with different transition temperatures, whose efficiency can be switched in a wide range of temperatures. However, degradation at high temperature and probability of having side products are the limitation for temperature stimulus. Light has been used as noninvasive external trigger, which allows control in spatiotemporal precision. However, most of the examples are based on azobenzene-based molecules, while a larger variability could be obtained by employing different photoswitchable compounds. Electrochemically induced redox-switchable systems are convenient for metal-based catalysts due to easy modulation of redox-potential of the metal center. However, limitations regarding electrodes, and electrolytes remain major challenges in this field. With ongoing technological advancement, the scope, utility, and versatility of various stimuli-induced aqueous catalysis for organic transformations will continue to grow186. Altogether, a bright future is ahead for smart organocatalytic processes and encourage their applications in biological systems.
References
Motlagh, H. N., Wrabl, J. O., Li, J. & Hilser, V. J. The ensemble nature of allostery. Nature 508, 331–339 (2014).
Dong, Z., Luo, Q. & Liu, J. Artificial enzymes based on supramolecular scaffolds. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 7890–7908 (2012). This article provides an overview of artificial enzymes based on supramolecular scaffolds.
Raynal, M., Ballester, P., Vidal-Ferran, A. & van Leeuwen, P. W. Supramolecular catalysis. Part 2: artificial enzyme mimics. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 1734–1785 (2014).
Eelkema, R. & van Esch, J. H. Catalytic control over the formation of supramolecular materials. Org. Biomol. Chem. 12, 6292–6296 (2014).
Maity, C., Trausel, F. & Eelkema, R. Selective activation of organocatalysts by specific signals. Chem. Sci. 9, 5999–6005 (2018).
Guruge, C. et al. Caged proline in photoinitiated organocatalysis. J. Org. Chem. 84, 5236–5244 (2019).
Blanco, V., Leigh, D. A. & Marcos, V. Artificial switchable catalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 5341–5370 (2015). The article reviews switchable catalytic systems whose activity and/or selectivity can be controlled by stimuli.
Choudhury, J. Recent developments on artificial switchable catalysis. Tetrahedron Lett. 59, 487–495 (2018).
Hazra, S., Gallou, F. & Handa, S. Water: an underestimated solvent for amide bond-forming reactions. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 10, 5299–5306 (2022).
Lipshutz, B. L. When does organic chemistry follow nature’s lead and “make the switch”? J. Org. Chem. 82, 2806–2816 (2017).
Jimeno, C. Water in asymmetric organocatalytic systems: a global perspective. Org. Biomol. Chem. 14, 6147–6164 (2016).
Kitanosono, T., Masuda, K., Xu, P. & Kobayashi, S. Catalytic organic reactions in water toward sustainable society. Chem. Rev. 118, 679–746 (2018).
Blackmond, D. G., Armstrong, A., Coombe, V. & Wells, A. Water in organocatalytic processes: debunking the myths. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46, 3798–3800 (2007).
Raj, M. & Singh, V. K. Organocatalytic reactions in water. Chem. Commun. 6687–6703, https://doi.org/10.1039/b910861k (2009).
Cortes-Clerget, M. et al. Water as the reaction medium in organic chemistry: from our worst enemy to our best friend. Chem. Sci. 12, 4237–4266 (2021). This article provides a discussion about water as medium for organic reactions including “on water” and “in water” phenomena.
Serrano-Luginbühl, S., Ruiz-Mirazo, K., Ostaszewski, R., Gallou, F. & Walde, P. Soft and dispersed interface-rich aqueous systems that promote and guide chemical reactions. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2, 306–327 (2018).
Butler, R. N. & Coyne, A. G. Water: Nature’s reaction enforcer-comparative effects for organic synthesis “In-water” and “On-water”. Chem. Rev. 110, 6302–6337 (2010).
Brogan, A. P., Dickerson, T. J. & Janda, K. D. Enamine-based aldol organocatalysis in water: are they really “All Wet”? Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45, 8100–8102 (2006).
Mase, N. & Barbas, C. F. III In water, on water, and by water: mimicking nature’s aldolases with organocatalysis and water. Org. Biomol. Chem. 8, 4043–4050 (2010).
Kitanosono, T. & Kobayashi, S. Reactions in water through “On-Water” mechanism. Chem. Eur. J. 26, 9408–9429 (2020).
Liu, S., Du, P., Sun, H., Yu, H.–Y. & Wang, Z.-G. Bioinspired supramolecular catalysts from designed self-assembly of DNA or peptides. ACS Catal. 10, 14937–14958 (2020).
van der Helm, M. P., Klemm, B. & Eelkema, R. Organocatalysis in aqueous media. Nat. Rev. Chem. 3, 491–508 (2019). The article provides a comprehensive overview of organocatalytic reactions in aqueous media including reaction mechanism and comparison with enzymatic activity.
Ostermeier, M. Designing switchable enzymes. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 19, 442–448 (2009).
Winkler, C. K., Schrittwieser, J. H. & Kroutil, W. Power of biocatalysis for organic synthesis. ACS Cent. Sci. 7, 55–71 (2021).
Wells, P. K., Smutok, O., Melman, A. & Katz, E. Switchable biocatalytic reactions controlled by interfacial pH changes produced by orthogonal biocatalytic processes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13, 33830–33839 (2021).
Fastrez, J. Engineering allosteric regulation into biological catalysts. Chembiochem 10, 2824–2835 (2009).
Callender, R. & Dyer, R. B. Advances in time-resolved approaches to characterize the dynamical nature of enzymatic catalysis. Chem. Rev. 106, 3031–3042 (2006).
Makhlynets, O. V., Raymond, E. A. & Korendovych, I. V. Design of allosterically regulated protein catalysts. Biochemistry 54, 1444–1145 (2015).
Solomon, L. A., Kronenberg, J. B. & Fry, H. C. Control of heme coordination and catalytic activity by conformational changes in peptide–amphiphile assemblies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 8497–8507 (2017).
Plaut, B. & Knowles, J. R. pH-dependence of the triose phosphate isomerase reaction. Biochem. J. 129, 311–320 (1972).
Raines, R. T., Sutton, E. L., Straus, D. R., Gilbert, W. & Knowles, J. R. Reaction energetics of a mutant triose phosphate isomerase in which the active-site glutamate has been changed to aspartate. Biochemistry 25, 7142–7154 (1986).
Lodi, P. J. & Knowles, J. R. Neutral imidazole is the electrophile in the reaction catalyzed by triosephosphate isomerase: structural origins and catalytic implications. Biochemistry 30, 6948–6956 (1991).
Guler, M. O. & Stupp, S. I. A self-assembled nanofiber catalyst for ester hydrolysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 12082–12083 (2007).
Zhang, C. et al. Self-assembled peptide nanofibers designed as biological enzymes for catalyzing ester hydrolysis. ACS Nano 8, 11715–11723 (2014).
Huerta, E. et al. Triggering activity of catalytic rod-like supramolecular polymers. Chem. Eur. J. 21, 3682–3690 (2015).
Bohwmick, S., Zhang, L., Ouyang, G. & Liu, M. Self-assembly of amphiphilic dipeptide with homo- and heterochiral centers and their application in asymmetric aldol reaction. ACS Omega 3, 8329–8336 (2018).
Arlegui, A. et al. Spontaneous mirror-symmetry breaking coupled to top-bottom chirality transfer: from porphyrin self-assembly to scalemic Diels–Alder adducts. Chem. Commun. 55, 12219–12222 (2019).
Che, H. & van Hest, J. C. M. Adaptive polymersome nanoreactors. ChemNanoMat 5, 1092–1109 (2019).
Zhang, C. et al. Switchable hydrolase based on reversible formation of supramolecular catalytic site using a self-assembling peptide. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 14511–14515 (2017).
Arlegui, A., Torres, P., Cuesta, V., Crusats, J. & Moyano, A. A pH-switchable aqueous organocatalysis with amphiphilic secondary amine–porphyrin hybrids. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 4399–4407 (2020).
Kocak, G., Tuncer, C. & Bütün, V. pH-Responsive polymers. Polym. Chem. 8, 144–176 (2017).
Altava, B., Burguete, M. I., García-Verdugo, E. & Luis, S. V. Chiral catalysts immobilized on achiral polymers: effect of the polymer support on the performance of the catalyst. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 2722–2771 (2018).
List, B. Proline-catalyzed asymmetric reactions. Tetrahedron 58, 5573–5590 (2002).
Gruttadauria, M., Giacalone, F. & Noto, R. Supported proline and proline-derivatives as recyclable organocatalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 37, 1666–1688 (2008).
Sakthivel, K., Notz, W., Bui, T. & Barbas, C. F. Amino acid catalyzed direct asymmetric aldol reactions: a bioorganic approach to catalytic asymmetric carbon–carbon bond-forming reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 5260–5267 (2001).
Hayashi, Y. In water or in the presence of water? Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45, 8103–8104 (2006).
Lipshutz, B. H. & Ghorai, S. Organocatalysis in water at room temperature with in-flask catalyst recycling. Org. Lett. 14, 422–425 (2012).
van Oers, M. C. M., Veldmate, W. S., van Hest, J. C. M. & Rutjes, F. P. J. T. Aqueous asymmetric aldol reactions in polymersome membranes. Polym. Chem. 6, 5358–5361 (2015).
Doyagűez, E. G. et al. Linear copolymers of proline methacrylate and styrene as catalysts for aldol reactions in water: Effect of the copolymer aggregation on the enantioselectivity. Macromolecules 44, 6268–6276 (2011).
Prado, A. D. et al. Aqueous micro and nanoreactors based on alternating copolymers of phenylmaleimide and vinylpyrrolidone bearing pendant L-proline stabilized with PEG grafted chain. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 55, 1228–1236 (2016).
Tang, Y. et al. L-Proline functionalized pH-responsive copolymers as supported organocatalysts for asymmetric aldol reaction in water. React. Funct. Polym. 150, 104544 (2020).
Zotova, N., Franzke, A., Armstrong, A. & Blackmond, D. G. Clarification of the role of water in proline-mediated aldol reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 15100–15101 (2007).
Thomas, J. M. & Thomas, W. J. Principles and Practice of Heterogeneous Catalysis (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1997).
Chng, L. L., Erathodiyil, N. & Ying, J. Y. Nanostructured catalysts for organic transformations. Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 1825–1837 (2013). This article reviews the use of nanostructured materials for catalytic organic reactions.
Chiozzi, V. & Rossi, F. Inorganic–organic core/shell nanoparticles: progress and applications. Nanoscale Adv. 2, 5090–5105 (2020).
Zhang, M. & Zhang, W. Pd nanoparticles immobilized on pH-responsive and chelating nanospheres as an efficient and recyclable catalyst for Suzuki reaction in water. J. Phys. Chem. C. 112, 6245–6252 (2008).
Xiao, C., Chen, S., Zhang, L., Zhou, S. & Wu, W. One-pot synthesis of responsive catalytic Au@PVP hybrid nanogels. Chem. Commun. 48, 11751–11753 (2012).
Ansari, S. N., Chakraborty, S. & Kitchens, C. L. pH-Responsive mercaptoundecanoic acid functionalized gold nanoparticles and applications in catalysis. Nanomaterials 8, 339 (2018).
Ni, L., Yu, C., Wei, Q., Liu, D. & Qiu, J. Pickering emulsion catalysis: Interfacial chemistry, catalyst design, challenges, and perspectives. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, e202115885 (2022).
Yang, Y. et al. An Overview of pickering emulsions: solid-particle materials, classification, morphology, and applications. Front. Pharmacol. 8, 287 (2017).
Chang, F., Vis, C. M., Ciptonugroho, W. & Bruijnincx, P. C. A. Recent developments in catalysis with pickering emulsions. Green. Chem. 23, 2575–2594 (2021). The article provides an overview of Pickering emulsions catalysis.
Yang, H., Zhou, T. & Zhang, W. A strategy for separating and recycling solid catalysts based on the pH-triggered pickering-emulsion inversion. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 7455–7459 (2013).
Fang, Z., Yang, D., Gao, Y. & Li, H. pH-Responsible pickering emulsion and its catalytic application for reaction at water–oil interface. Colloid Polym. Sci. 293, 1505–1513 (2015).
Qi, L., Luo, Z. & Lu, X. Facile synthesis of starch-based nanoparticles stabilized pickering emulsion: its pH-responsive behavior and application for the recyclable catalysis. Green. Chem. 20, 1538–1550 (2018).
Arcus, V. L. et al. On the temperature dependence of enzyme-catalyzed rates. Biochemistry 55, 1681–1688 (2016).
Frazar, E. M., Shah, R. A., Dziubla, T. D. & Hilt, J. Z. Multifunctional temperature-responsive polymers as advanced biomaterials and beyond. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 137, 48770 (2019).
Liu, H., Prachyathipsakul, T., Koyasseril-Yehiya, T. M., Le, S. P. & Thayumanavan, S. Molecular bases for temperature sensitivity in supramolecular assemblies and their applications as thermoresponsive soft materials. Mater. Horiz. 9, 164–193 (2022).
Zhang, J., Zhang, M., Tang, K., Verpoort, F. & Sun, T. Polymer-based stimuli-responsive recyclable catalytic systems for organic synthesis. Small 10, 32–46 (2014).
Wei, W., Zhu, M., Wu, S., Shen, X. & Li, S. Stimuli-responsive biopolymers: an inspiration for synthetic smart materials and their applications in self-controlled catalysis. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. 30, 69–87 (2020).
Gaitzsch, J., Huang, X. & Voit, B. Engineering functional polymer capsules toward smart nanoreactors. Chem. Rev. 116, 1053–1093 (2016).
Shen, T. et al. Recent advances on micellar catalysis in water. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 287, 102299 (2021).
Zayas, H. A. et al. Thermoresponsive polymer-supported L-proline micelle catalysts for the direct asymmetric aldol reaction in water. ACS Macro Lett. 2, 327–331 (2013).
Ge, Z. et al. Stimuli-responsive double hydrophilic block copolymer micelles with switchable catalytic activity. Macromolecules 40, 3538–3546 (2007).
Yu, X., Herberg, A. & Kuckling, D. Micellar organocatalysis using smart polymer supports: influence of thermoresponsive self-assembly on catalytic activity. Polymers 12, 2265 (2020).
Plamper, F. A. & Richtering, W. Functional microgels and microgel systems. Acc. Chem. Res. 50, 131–140 (2017).
Tan, K. H. et al. Selenium-modified microgels as bio-inspired oxidation catalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 9791–9796 (2019).
Lu, A., Cotanda, P., Patterson, J. P., Longbottom, D. A. & O’Reilly, R. K. Aldol reactions catalyzed by L-proline functionalized polymeric nanoreactors in water. Chem. Commun. 48, 9699–9701 (2012).
Chen, T. et al. Highly efficient polymer-based nanoreactors for selective oxidation of alcohols in water. Mol. Catal. 474, 110422 (2019).
Chen, T. et al. Triphenylphosphine-containing thermo-responsive copolymers: synthesis, characterization and catalysis application. Macromol. Res. 27, 931–937 (2019).
Kuepfert, M., Ahmed, E. & Weck, M. Self-assembled thermoresponsive molecular brushes as nanoreactors for asymmetric aldol addition in water. Macromolecules 54, 3845–3853 (2021).
Cotanda, P., Lu, A., Patterson, J. P., Petzetakis, N. & O’Reilly, R. K. Functionalized organocatalytic nanoreactors: hydrophobic pockets for acylation reactions in water. Macromolecules 45, 2377 (2012).
He, X. et al. Synthetic homeostatic materials with chemo-mechano-chemical self-regulation. Nature 487, 214–218 (2012). This article provides an example of catalyst engineering for controlled chemical conversion via control over local environment.
Zarzar, L. D. & Aizenberg, J. Stimuli-responsive chemomechanical actuation: a hybrid materials approach. Acc. Chem. Res. 47, 530–539 (2014).
Lu, A., Moatsou, D., Hands-Portman, I., Longbottom, D. A. & O’Reilly, R. K. Recyclable L-proline functional nanoreactors with temperature-tuned activity based on core−shell nanogels. ACS Macro Lett. 3, 1235–1239 (2014).
Lu, Y., Mei, Y., Drechsler, M. & Ballauff, M. Thermosensitive core-shell particles as carriers for Ag nanoparticles: modulating the catalytic activity by a phase transition in networks. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45, 813–816 (2006).
Lu, Y. et al. Thermosensitive core-shell microgel as a “nanoreactor” for catalytic active metal nanoparticles. J. Mater. Chem. 19, 3955 (2009).
Wang, Y., Yan, R., Zhang, J. & Zhang, W. Synthesis of efficient and reusable catalyst of size-controlled Au nanoparticles within a porous, chelating and intelligent hydrogel for aerobic alcohol oxidation. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 317, 81–88 (2010).
Xiong, D. et al. Modulating the catalytic activity of Au/micelles by tunable hydrophilic channels. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 341, 273–279 (2010).
Huang, X. et al. Smart microgel catalyst with modulatory glutathione peroxidase activity. Soft Matter 5, 1905–1911 (2009).
Boucher-Jacobs, C., Rabnawaz, M., Katz, J. S., Even, R. & Guironnet, D. Encapsulation of catalyst in block copolymer micelles for the polymerization of ethylene in aqueous medium. Nat. Commun. 9, 841 (2018).
Tevet, S., Wagle, S. S., Slor, G. & Amir, R. J. Tuning the reactivity of micellar nanoreactors by precise adjustments of the amphiphile and substrate hydrophobicity. Macromolecules 54, 11419–11426 (2021).
Pang, H., Hu, Y., Yu, J., Gallou, F. & Lipshutz, B. H. Water-sculpting of a heterogeneous nanoparticle precatalyst for Mizoroki–Heck couplings under aqueous micellar catalysis conditions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 3373–3382 (2021).
Xiao, X. C., Chu, L. Y., Chen, W. M., Wang, S. & Li, Y. Positively thermo-sensitive monodisperse core–shell microspheres. Adv. Funct. Mater. 13, 847–852 (2003).
Li, S., Ge, Y., Tiwari, A. & Cao, S. A temperature-responsive nanoreactor. Small 6, 2453–2459 (2010).
Tian, J., Huang, B. & Zhang, W. Precise self-assembly and controlled catalysis of thermoresponsive core–satellite multicomponent hybrid nanoparticles. Langmuir 35, 266–275 (2019).
O’Reilly, R. K., Hawker, C. J. & Wooley, K. L. Cross-linked block copolymer micelles: functional nanostructures of great potential and versatility. Chem. Soc. Rev. 35, 1068 (2006).
Dong, Y. et al. Thermo-responsive polymer-tethered and Pd NPs loaded UiO-66 NMOF for biphasic CBs dechlorination. Green. Chem. 21, 1625–1634 (2019).
Winarta, J. et al. A decade of UiO-66 research: a historic review of dynamic structure, synthesis mechanisms, and characterization techniques of an archetypal metal–organic framework. Cryst. Growth Des. 20, 1347–1362 (2020).
Rizzo, C., Marullo, S., Billeci, F. & D’Anna, F. Catalysis in supramolecular systems: the case of gel phases. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 22, 3148–3169 (2021).
Foster, J. A. & Steed, J. W. Exploiting cavities in supramolecular gels. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 6718–6724 (2010).
Neumann, L. N. et al. Supramolecular polymers for organocatalysis in water. Org. Biomol. Chem. 13, 7711 (2015).
Díaz Díaz, D., Kühbeck, D. & Koopmans, R. J. Stimuli-responsive gels as reaction vessels and reusable catalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 40, 427 (2011).
Hapiot, F., Menuel, S. & Monflier, E. Thermoresponsive hydrogels in catalysis. ACS Catal. 3, 1006–1010 (2013).
Rodríguez-Llansola, F., Escuder, B. & Miravet, J. F. Switchable perfomance of an L-proline-derived basic catalyst controlled by supramolecular gelation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 11478–11484 (2009).
Léger, B., Menuel, S., Ponchel, A., Hapiot, F. & Monflier, E. Nanoparticle-based catalysis using supramolecular hydrogels. Adv. Synth. Catal. 354, 1269–1272 (2012).
Durr, H. & Bouas-Laurent, H. Photochromism: Molecules and Systems (Elsevier, 2003). This book gives a comprehensive review of photochromic molecules and photoresponsive systems.
Neilson, B. M. & Bielawski, C. W. Illuminating photoswitchable catalysis. ACS Catal. 3, 1874–1885 (2013).
Vlatkovic, M., Collins, B. S. L. & Feringa, B. L. Dynamic responsive systems for catalytic function. Chem. Eur. J. 22, 17080–17111 (2016).
van Dijk, L. et al. Molecular machines for catalysis. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2, 0117 (2018). This article provides a comprehensive overview of molecular machines as catalysts for controlling chemical reactions.
Stoll, R. S. & Hecht, S. Artificial light-gated catalyst systems. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 5054–5075 (2010).
Toney, M. D. Controlling reaction specificity in pyridoxal phosphate enzymes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1814, 1407–1418 (2011).
Wilson, D. & Branda, N. R. Turning “On” and “Off” a pyridoxal 5’-phosphate mimic using light. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 5431–5434 (2012).
Ueno, A., Takahashi, K. & Osa, T. Photoregulation of catalytic activity of β-cyclodextrin by an azo inhibitor. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 837–838, https://doi.org/10.1039/C39800000837 (1980).
Ueno, A., Takahashi, K. & Osa, T. Photocontrol of catalytic activity of capped cyclodextrin. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 3, 94–96 (1981).
Lee, W.-S. & Ueno, A. Photocontrol of the catalytic activity of a β-cyclodextrin bearing azobenzene and histidine moieties as a pendant group. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 22, 448–450 (2001).
Zhu, L. et al. Photoswitchable supramolecular catalysis by interparticle host–guest competitive binding. Chem. Eur. J. 18, 13979–13983 (2012).
Zhao, Y. et al. A supramolecular approach to construct a hydrolase mimic with photo-switchable catalytic activity. J. Mater. Chem. B 6, 2444–2449 (2018).
Imahori, T. & Kurihara, S. Stimuli-responsive cooperative catalysts based on dynamic conformational changes toward spatiotemporal control of chemical reactions. Chem. Lett. 43, 1524–1531 (2014).
Samanta, M., Ramakrishna, V. S. & Bandyopadhyay, S. A photoresponsive glycosidase mimic. Chem. Commun. 50, 10577–10579 (2014).
Zechel, D. L. & Withers, S. G. Glycosidase mechanisms: anatomy of a finely tuned catalyst. Acc. Chem. Res. 33, 11–18 (2000).
Kim, C. U. et al. Tracking solvent and protein movement during CO2 release in carbonic anhydrase II crystals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 5257–5262 (2016).
Saha, M. & Bandyopadhyay, S. A reversible photoresponsive activity of a carbonic anhydrase mimic. Chem. Commun. 55, 3294–3297 (2019).
Ren, C. Z.-J., Muñana, P. S., Dupont, J., Zhou, S. S. & Chen, J. L.-Y. Reversible formation of a light-responsive catalyst by utilizing intermolecular cooperative effects. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 15254 (2019).
Neri, S., Martin, S. G., Pezzato, C. & Prins, L. J. Photoswitchable catalysis by a nanozyme mediated by a light-sensitive cofactor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 1794–1797 (2017).
Sanchez-Iglesias, A. et al. Hydrophobic interactions modulate self-assembly of nanoparticles. ACS Nano 6, 11059–11065 (2012).
Kundu, P., Olsen, G., Kiss, V. & Klajn, R. Nanoporous frameworks exhibiting multiple stimuli responsiveness. Nat. Commun. 5, 3588 (2014).
Zhao, H. et al. Reversible trapping and reaction acceleration within dynamically self-assembling nanoflasks. Nat. Nanotech. 11, 82–88 (2016). This article is an example of catalysis engineering for controlled chemical reaction employing light as stimulus.
Li, Z. et al. Light-switched reversible emulsification and demulsification of oil-in-water Pickering emulsions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 3928–3933 (2021).
Niu, F., Zhai, J., Jiang, L. & Song, W.-G. Light induced activity switch in interfacial hydrogen-bond catalysis with photo sensitive metal oxides. Chem. Commun. 31, 4738−4740 (2009).
Kawasaki, H. et al. Reversible vesicle formation by changing pH. J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 1524–1527 (2002).
Dwars, T., Paetzold, E. & Oehme, G. Reactions in micellar systems. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44, 7174–7199 (2005).
Sinibaldi, A. et al. Asymmetric organocatalysis accelerated via self-assembled minimal structures. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 39, 5403–5406 (2021).
Zhang, B. et al. The synthesis of chiral isotetronic acids with amphiphilic imidazole/pyrrolidine catalysts assembled in oil-in-water emulsion droplets. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 13159–13162 (2012).
Qin, L. et al. Supramolecular assemblies of amphiphilic L-proline regulated by compressed CO2 as a recyclable organocatalyst for the asymmetric aldol reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 7761–7765 (2013).
Yoon, H. J., Kuwabara, J., Kim, J.-H. & Mirkin, C. A. Allosteric supramolecular triple-layer catalysts. Science 330, 66–69 (2010).
Lifschitz, A. M. et al. An allosteric photoredox catalyst inspired by photosynthetic machinery. Nat. Commun. 6, 6541 (2015).
Goswami, A., Saha, S., Biswas, P. K. & Schmittel, M. Nano)mechanical motion triggered by metal coordination: from functional devices to networked multicomponent catalytic machinery. Chem. Rev. 120, 125–199 (2020).
Kovbasyuk, L. & Krämer, R. Allosteric supramolecular receptors and catalysts. Chem. Rev. 104, 3161–3187 (2004).
Pan, T., Wang, Y., Xue, X. & Zhang, C. Rational design of allosteric switchable catalysts. Exploration 2, 20210095 (2022).
Yoon, H. J., Heo, J. & Mirkin, C. A. Allosteric regulation of phosphate diester transesterification based upon a dinuclear zinc catalyst assembled via the weak-link approach. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 14182–14183 (2007).
Farrell, J. R., Mirkin, C. A., Guzei, I. A., Liable-Sands, L. M. & Rheingold, A. L. The weak-link approach to the synthesis of inorganic macrocycles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 37, 465–467 (1998).
Allen, A. E. & MacMillan, D. W. C. Synergistic catalysis: a powerful synthetic strategy for new reaction development. Chem. Sci. 3, 633–658 (2012).
Pimentel, E. B., Peters-Clarke, T. M., Coon, J. J. & Martell, J. D. DNA-scaffolded synergistic catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 21402–21409 (2021).
Comellas-Aragonès, M. et al. A virus-based single-enzyme nanoreactor. Nat. Nanotech 2, 635–639 (2007).
Buddingh, B. C. & van Hest, J. C. M. Artificial cells: synthetic compartments with life-like functionality and adaptivity. Acc. Chem. Res. 50, 769–777 (2017).
Vázquez-González, M., Wang, C. & Willner, I. Biocatalytic cascades operating on macromolecular scaffolds and in confined environments. Nat. Catal. 3, 256–273 (2020).
Liu, S. et al. DNA nanotweezers for biosensing applications: Recent advances and future prospects. ACS Sens. 7, 3–20 (2022).
Watson, E. E., Angerani, S., Sabale, P. M. & Winssinger, N. Biosupramolecular systems: integrating cues into responses. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 4467–4482 (2021).
Mukherjee, P., Leman, L. J., Griffin, J. H. & Ghadiri, M. R. Design of a DNA-programmed plasminogen activator. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 15516–15524 (2018).
Boekhoven, J., Hendriksen, W. E., Koper, G. J. M., Eelkema, R. & van Esch, J. H. Transient assembly of active materials fueled by a chemical reaction. Science 349, 1075–1079 (2015).
van Rossum, S. A. P., Tena-Solsona, M., van Esch, J. H., Eelkema, R. & Boekhoven, J. Dissipative out-of-equilibrium assembly of man-made supramolecular materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 5519–5535 (2017).
Grzybowski, B. A. & Huck, W. T. S. The nanotechnology of life-inspired systems. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 585–592 (2016).
Singh, N., Formon, G. J. M., De Piccoli, S. & Hermans, T. M. Devising synthetic reaction cycles for dissipative nonequilibrium self-assembly. Adv. Mater. 32, 1906834 (2020).
Das, K., Gabrielli, L. & Prins, L. J. Chemically-fueled self-assembly in biology and chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 20120–20143 (2021).
Kathan, M. & Hecht, S. Photoswitchable molecules as key ingredients to drive systems away from the global thermodynamic minimum. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 5536–5550 (2017).
van Leeuwen, T., Lubbe, A. S., Štacko, P., Wezenberg, S. J. & Feringa, B. L. Dynamic control of function by light-driven molecular motors. Nat. Rev. Chem. 1, 0096 (2017).
Amano, S., Borsley, S., Leigh, D. A. & Zhanhu, S. Chemical engines: driving systems away from equilibrium through catalyst reaction cycles. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 1057–1067 (2021).
Maiti, S., Fortunati, I., Ferrante, C., Scrimin, P. & Prins, L. J. Dissipative self-assembly of vesicular nanoreactors. Nat. Chem. 8, 725–731 (2016).
Cardona, M. A. & Prins, L. J. ATP-fuelled self-assembly to regulate chemical reactivity in the time domain. Chem. Sci. 11, 1518–1522 (2020).
Zhang, L., Marcos, V. & Leigh, D. A. Molecular machines with bio-inspired mechanisms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 9397–9404 (2018).
Wilson, M. R. et al. An autonomous chemically fuelled small-molecule motor. Nature 534, 235–240 (2016).
Heard, A. W., Suárez, J. M. & Goldup, S. M. Controlling catalyst activity, chemoselectivity and stereoselectivity with the mechanical bond. Nat. Rev. Chem. 6, 182–196 (2022). This article provides an overview of mechanically interlocked molecules for catalytic applications.
Muñana, S. P. et al. Substrate-induced self-assembly of cooperative catalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. ed. 57, 16469–16474 (2018).
Biagini, C. et al. Dissipative catalysis with a molecular machine. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 9876 (2019).
van der Helm, M. P., Li, G., Hartono, M. & Eelkema, R. Transient host–guest complexation to control catalytic activity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 9465 (2022).
Möhle, S. et al. Modern electrochemical aspects for the synthesis of value-added organic products. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 6018 (2018).
Siu, J. C., Fu, N. & Lin, S. Catalyzing electrosynthesis: a homogeneous electrocatalytic approach to reaction discovery. Acc. Chem. Res. 53, 547–560 (2020).
Giljohann, D. A. et al. Gold nanoparticles for biology and medicine. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 3280–3294 (2010).
Prins, L. J. Emergence of complex chemistry on an organic monolayer. Acc. Chem. Res. 48, 1920–1928 (2015).
della Sala, F. et al. Reversible electrochemical modulation of a catalytic nanosystem. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 10737 (2016).
Qu, Y., Sun, D. & Yu, Y. Interfacial engineering in pickering emulsion photocatalytic microreactors: from mechanisms to prospects. Chem. Eng. J. 438, 135655 (2022).
Shi, Y. et al. Ambient CO2/N2 switchable pickering emulsion emulsified by TETA-functionalized metal–organic frameworks. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 53385–53393 (2020).
Byun, J., Huang, W., Wang, D., Li, R. & Zhang, K. A. I. CO2-triggered switchable hydrophilicity of heterogeneous conjugated polymer photocatalyst for enhanced catalytic activity in water. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 2967–2971 (2018).
Cheng, T., Zhang, D., Lia, H. & Liu, G. Magnetically recoverable nanoparticles as efficient catalysts for organic transformations in aqueous medium. Green. Chem. 16, 3401–3427 (2014).
Mrówczyński, R., Nan, A. & Liebscher, J. Magnetic nanoparticle-supported organocatalysts—an efficient way of recycling and reuse. RSC Adv. 4, 5927–5952 (2014).
Wang, Q. et al. Thermal and magnetic dual-responsive L-proline nanohybrids for aqueous asymmetric aldol reaction. React. Funct. Polym. 149, 104508 (2020).
Tang, J. et al. Pickering interfacial catalysts with CO2 and magnetic dual response for fast recovering in biphasic reaction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 16156–16163 (2019).
Anelli, P. L., Biffi, C., Montanari, F. & Quici, S. Fast and selective oxidation of primary alcohols to aldehydes or to carboxylic acids and of secondary alcohols to ketones mediated by oxoammonium salts under two-phase conditions. J. Org. Chem. 52, 2559–2562 (1987).
Karami, B., Hoseini, S. J., Eskandari, K., Ghasemi, A. & Nasrabadi, H. Synthesis of xanthene derivatives by employing Fe3O4 nanoparticles as an effective and magnetically recoverable catalyst in water. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2, 331–338 (2012).
Pagoti, S., Surana, S., Chauhan, A., Parasar, B. & Dash, J. Reduction of organic azides to amines using reusable Fe3O4 nanoparticles in aqueous medium. Catal. Sci. Technol. 3, 584–588 (2013).
Piermattei, A., Karthikeyan, S. & Sijbesma, R. Activating catalysts with mechanical force. Nat. Chem. 1, 133–137 (2009).
Groote, R., Jakobs, R. T. M. & Sijbesma, R. P. Mechanocatalysis: forcing latent catalysts into action. Polym. Chem. 4, 4846–4859 (2013).
Pickhardt, W., Grätz, S. & Borchardt, L. Direct mechanocatalysis: using milling balls as catalysts. Chem. Eur. J. 26, 12903–12911 (2020).
Schumacher, C. et al. Mechanochemical dehydrocoupling of dimethylamine borane and hydrogenation reactions using Wilkinson’s catalyst. Chem. Commun. 54, 8355–8358 (2018).
Maity, C. & Das, N. Alginate-based smart materials and their application: recent advances and perspectives. Top. Curr. Chem. (Z.) 380, 3 (2022).
Robertson, J. C., Coote, M. L. & Bissember, A. C. Synthetic applications of light, electricity, mechanical force and flow. Nat. Rev. Chem. 3, 290–304 (2019).
Acknowledgements
Author (C.M.) acknowledges the funding from the Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB)-Department of Science and Technology (DST) as Start-up research grant (No. – SRG/2020/000571). N.D. thanks DST for INSPIRE fellowship (Ref. No. – DST/INSPIRE/03/2022/000179). Authors (C.M. and N.D.) thank the management of VIT, Vellore for the support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.M. conceived the scope of the article. N.D. and C.M. searched the literature, constructed the topics, and wrote the manuscript. C.M. supervised the work. All authors revised and commented on the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Communications Chemistry thanks Robert Göstl and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Das, N., Maity, C. Switchable aqueous catalytic systems for organic transformations. Commun Chem 5, 115 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-022-00734-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-022-00734-z
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.