Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Robust and biocompatible catalysts for efficient hydrogen-driven microbial electrosynthesis


CO2 reduction by combined electro- and bio-catalytic reactions is a promising technology platform for sustainable production of chemicals from CO2 and electricity. While heterogeneous electrocatalysts can reduce CO2 to a variety of organic compounds at relatively high reaction rates, these catalysts have limitations achieving high selectivity for any single product beyond CO. Conversely, microbial CO2 reduction pathways proceed at high selectivity; however, the rates at bio-cathodes using direct electron supply via electricity are commonly limiting. Here we demonstrate the use of non-precious metal cathodes that produce hydrogen in situ to support microbial CO2 reduction to C1 and C2 compounds. CoP, MoS2 and NiMo cathodes perform durable hydrogen evolution under biologically relevant conditions, and the integrated system achieves coulombic efficiencies close to 100% without accumulating hydrogen. Moreover, the one-reactor hybrid platform is successfully used for efficient acetate production from electricity and CO2 by microbes previously reported to be inactive in bioelectrochemical systems.


CO2 as a sole carbon source offers an attractive platform for the sustainable production of chemicals and fuels, with the potential to avoid emitting annually 38.2 billion tons of this greenhouse gas while increasing the independence from fossil resources. Renewable energy technologies are providing new and competitive alternatives for production processes based on (bio)electrochemical reduction of CO2 to chemicals1,2. Assuming that these chemicals can be combusted as fuels, a carbon-neutral fuel and chemical cycle can be envisioned (cf. Fig. 1a).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Process overview. Schematic of a directly integrated bioelectrochemical system for sustainable production of chemicals from electricity and inorganic carbon. a Illustration of the envisioned carbon-neutral economy. b Integrated bioelectrochemical reactor; anode (+) and cathode (−) compartments are separated by a proton-exchange membrane (CEM). The target reaction on the cathode is the evolution of hydrogen as an electron donor for the microbial reduction of CO2. The displayed microbial catalysts are homoacetogenic bacteria (purple rod) and methanogenic archaea (green cocci) as demonstrated in the presented study. Efficient conversion of electricity and CO2 is achieved for the target products acetate and methane, respectively, via highly biocompatible transition-metal-based cathodes in microbial growth media (Coulombic efficiency near 100%). The system can be powered by any electricity source including renewable sources

A significant advantage of heterogeneous electrocatalysis processes for reducing CO2 to C1 and C2+ compounds are high reaction rates in relatively mild reaction conditions3,4,5,6. However, selectivity to multi-carbon compounds remains a major challenge, leading to low energy efficiencies and mixed product streams3,6,7,8. In addition, insufficient long-term stability of the electrocatalytic performance presents a key issue that must be overcome for practical implementation3,9,10,11,12,13,14. Microbial CO2 reduction reactions, on the other hand, are highly specific, selective, and stable. Moreover, metabolic engineering approaches continuously broaden the product spectrum to include high-value chemicals of industrial relevance15,16. Natural electron donors for microbial CO2 reduction processes are H2 and CO and direct supply of electrons for microbial metabolism via a cathode has been demonstrated in microbial electrosynthesis17,18. Several industrially relevant chemicals such as methane, acetic acid, butyric acid, isobutyric acid, hexanoic acid, ethanol, isopropanol, butanol, isobutanol, and hexanol have been shown to be produced via microbial electrosynthesis from CO2 and electricity19,20,21,22,23. However, these processes currently remain limited by low direct electron uptake rates from the cathode and by a limited number of microbes that are able to directly acquire electrons from solid state electrodes for CO2 reduction18,24. Thus, an integrated platform that combines the advantages of rapid electrochemical reduction reactions with highly selective microbial syntheses is desirable.

The common electron donor for microbial CO2 reduction is molecular hydrogen, which can be produced electrochemically via the well-established hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). HER is kinetically more facile than electrochemical CO2 reduction and achieves simultaneously high current densities and selectivity25. Hybrid processes have been proposed that couple the electrocatalytic H2 production in one process to microbial CO2 reduction in a second microbial gas fermentation step for the production of chemicals26,27,28. However, such two-step processes entail the pumping and mixing of a low-soluble and explosive gas (H2) at significant costs and safety risks29.

In fact, most bioelectrochemical CO2 reduction platforms seem to be driven by molecular hydrogen as intermediate30. The cathode material of choice in these systems is commonly carbon-based due to its low price and proven biocompatibility. However, production rates in microbial electrosynthesis can be increased significantly by modifying the cathode material towards more efficient HER, e.g., by introducing transition metals, such as nickel31,32. And while a direct integration of electro- and microbial-catalysis with H2 as an intermediate offers the possibility to increase overall electron transfer rates, it also presents a significant challenge, because the optimal environmental conditions for both processes differ substantially. While the electrocatalytic HER is best controlled under either strong acidic or alkaline conditions and in ultra-pure electrolytes, microbial synthesis proceeds at circumneutral pH, in the presence of essential media supplements (e.g. trace metals and vitamins) and with high concentrations of CO2. Severe deactivation of inorganic catalysts by microbial growth media components was observed in previous studies33 as well as toxic effects towards the microorganisms caused by dissolution of the cathode material34.

Due to their high electrochemical stability, transition-metal-based electrode materials were identified as particularly promising, and sustainable alternatives to Pt as catalysts for HER35,36,37. Here, we select the inexpensive, earth-abundant cobalt-phosphide (CoP), molybdenum-disulfide (MoS2), and nickel–molybdenum alloy (NiMo) as cathode materials as these show particularly promising properties at circumneutral pH35,36,38. We test their biocompatibility in a directly integrated bioelectrochemical system for production of chemicals from electricity and CO2 (cf. Fig. 1b), and characterize the electrochemical stability of the different materials under biologically relevant conditions. Using methanogenic archaea and homoacetogenic bacteria, we demonstrate stable and high rates of CO2 reduction to methane and acetate, respectively, at coulombic efficiencies of close to 100% and thereby a successfully integrated platform.


Biocompatible hydrogen production by non-precious metal cathodes

We first characterized hydrogen production rates of cathodes with CoP, MoS2, and NiMo as HER catalysts in pure bicarbonate buffer as an approximation for a biocompatible electrolyte for microbial CO2 reduction at neutral pH. Platinum was used as the reference catalyst for the HER in all experiments. The catalysts were prepared on planar silicon substrates of identical geometric surface areas. The resulting flat electrode surface enables direct comparison of the biocompatibility of the different materials in the integrated conditions by minimizing any convoluting effects introduced by surface roughness of the catalysts. The here presented rates were integrated over a period of 3 h to emphasize the long-term rather than initial performance.

At neutral pH in CO2-sparged aqueous solutions (0.03 M NaHCO3, pH 7), all three catalysts produced hydrogen at rates in the same order of magnitude as the benchmark catalyst platinum (see Fig. 2a and Supplementary Table 1). At all tested potentials (−0.6 to −1 V vs standard hydrogen electrode (SHE)) NiMo electrodes outperformed Pt, while the performances of the CoP and MoS2 electrodes was constantly lower than that of Pt. This trend became more pronounced with decreasing cathode potential. The highest H2 production rate of 48.0 ± 1.5 µmol h−1 cm−2 was observed for the NiMo alloy at a potential of −1 V vs SHE and a coulombic efficiency of 98.0 ± 3.1%. At the same working electrode potential, platinum achieved an average H2 production rate of 39.0 ± 1.5 µmol h−1 cm−2 at a CE of 99.0 ± 3.8%. The H2 production on CoP and MoS2 cathodes occurred at average rates of 11.1 ± 1.6 µmol h−1 cm−2 and 10.0 ± 1.1 µmol h−1 cm−2 and CEs of 94.1 ± 13.6% and 94.0 ± 9.2%, respectively. It is noteworthy that the HER performance can be significantly impacted by electrochemical conditions such as pH39,40, CO2 exposure40,41,42, and buffering anion concentration43,44. While a direct comparison to other state-of-the-art catalysts is challenging due to the aforementioned factors, the results clearly indicate that all tested catalysts can achieve favorable hydrogen production rates for biointegration, with the NiMo alloy presenting the most promising material under the conditions tested.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Hydrogen evolution rates under biocompatible conditions. Hydrogen evolution rates (HER, bar graph, left axis) and corresponding coulombic efficiencies (CE, scatter plot, right axis) of CoP, MoS2, and NiMo cathodes compared to platinum, the benchmark catalyst for H2 production. White bars and circles: platinum; turquoise bars and diamonds: CoP; dark blue bars and triangles: NiMo; purple bars and squares: MoS2. a At different potentials in 0.03 M sodium-bicarbonate buffer, pH 7. b At constant potential of −0.9 V vs SHE in 0.03 M NaHCO3-buffer and two different microbial growth media. Homoacetogen medium: modified-DSMZ-879; methanogen medium: modified-DSMZ-141. All reported HERs are averaged over a 3-h period. Given values are the mean of biological triplicates with error bars displaying standard deviations. For more details on experimental conditions, refer to the Methods section

Next, the activities of the different electrodes were characterized in the presence of different microbial growth media to evaluate their sensitivity towards required microbial media additions to the electrolyte. When tested in the presence of a yeast extract-containing complex medium used for growth of homoacetogenic bacteria (homoacetogen medium, 1 g L−1 yeast extract) and a marine minimal salt medium (methanogen medium, salinity of 30 g kg−1), cf. Fig. 2b, hydrogen evolution rates by CoP, MoS2, and NiMo electrodes were not significantly affected, indicating insensitivity of the materials towards the presence of essential growth compounds. In the complex homoacetogen medium, a slightly increased current density (+10%) was observed for both CoP and MoS2 (see Supplementary Table 1), while the corresponding coulombic efficiencies were slightly reduced from 94.0% and 96.0% to 84.7% and 83.0%, respectively (see Fig. 2b). This reduction in electron recovery was likely due to unspecific reduction reactions of organic compounds (from supplemented yeast extract) on the cathode surfaces, which seems to negatively affect the selectivity for H2 of both materials under these conditions. In summary, all three cathode materials exhibited relatively high selectivity for HER and remarkably stable performance under biological relevant conditions.

Integrated bioelectrochemical synthesis of methane and acetic acid

Next, we investigated the performance of CoP, MoS2, and NiMo electrodes in integrated bioelectrochemical systems for microbial production of acetate and methane from CO2 and electricity. In this proof-of-concept study, 1 cm2 flat cathodes were introduced into H-type, two-chamber reactors that are used for microbial electrochemistry45. A constant current of 1 mA cm−2 was applied to the cathodes while CO2 was provided as 20 vol/vol% in N2 gas atmosphere in the reactor headspace. These conditions provide an optimal environment for the selected microbial conversions, therefore excluding a limitation of the overall process by the microbial component.

In one set of experiments, the homoacetogenic bacterium Sporomusa ovata, which metabolizes CO2 and H2 to acetate (Eq. (1)), was introduced as microbial organism to investigate production of acetate as a liquid chemical. In a second set of experiments, we used the methanogenic archaeon Methanococcus maripaludis that reduces CO2 with H2 to CH4 (Eq. (2)), to investigate the production of a stable, gaseous hydrocarbon for energy storage.

$$2\,{\mathrm{CO}}_2 + 4\,{\mathrm{H}}_2 \to {\mathrm{CH}}_3{\mathrm{COOH}} + 2\,{\mathrm{H}}_2{\mathrm{O}}$$
$${\mathrm{CO}}_2 + 4\,{\mathrm{H}}_2 \to {\mathrm{CH}}_4 + 2\,{\mathrm{H}}_2{\mathrm{O}}$$

Electrocatalytically produced H2 was efficiently used by both microorganisms for CO2 reduction to acetate and methane, respectively, at high selectivity (Fig. 3, Supplementary Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table 2). Electron recovery in the respective product was near 100% in each case (see Supplementary Table 2). Figure 3 shows the production of acetate and methane in the integrated bioelectrochemical system using a NiMo cathode and S. ovata and M. maripaludis, respectively. The performance of the same system using CoP and MoS2 is summarized in Supplementary Fig. 2 and Table 2. Importantly, no H2 gas was detected (<1 vol/vol%) in the reactor headspace of each experiment throughout the entire duration of 48 h, indicating efficient and stable microbial uptake of the electrochemically produced H2 despite its low solubility in aqueous solutions. In fact, microsensor measurements46 of H2 concentration profiles in the bioelectrochemical system revealed elevated H2 concentrations only in close proximity, 50–100 µm, of the cathode surface (cf. Supplementary Fig. 3d). While the aqueous H2 concentration in abiotic, Ni–Mo cathode-containing reactors was around 220 µmol L−1, the presence and metabolism of M. maripaludis reduced that concentration to 0.2–0.6 µmol L−1 (cf. Supplementary Fig. 3a, c). Such efficient transfer of electrons from cathode into the microbial metabolism via hydrogen without the accumulation of high gas concentrations is an important feature of this directly integrated system for two main reasons: first, the use of H2 as intermediate circumvents the requirement of microbial electrosynthesis for a direct electron transfer and, therefore, extends the spectrum of microbial production hosts to possibly any gas fermenting microorganism. And secondly, the efficient H2 uptake close to the electrode surface could enable increased production rates as it is known that production rates in gas fermentation are commonly hydrogen limited15,47. Future research aiming to balance and maximize rates between inorganic HER and microbial CO2 reduction will facilitate engineering efforts to further advancing the technology29.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Bioelectrochemical production of acetate and methane. Performance of integrated bioelectrochemical systems for acetate (a) or methane (b) formation from CO2 and electricity, consisting of the two model organisms Sporomusa ovata and Methanococcus maripaludis and the in situ H2-producing cathode NiMo. Electrons were supplied with a constant current density of 1 mA cm−2 and total electrode surface was 1 cm2. The products acetate and methane are plotted as electron equivalents [mmol]. Dotted line: electrons; triangles: hydrogen; yellow diamonds: acetate; red circles: methane; blue triangles in stacked plots: cathode potential vs SHE. Given values are the mean of triplicate experiments with error bars displaying the standard deviation. Electrolyte was microbial growth medium (S. ovata: modified-DSMZ-879; M. maripaludis modified-DSMZ-141)

Notably, the cathode potentials to supply a constant current of 1 mA cm−2 for all three materials did not change significantly during the period of 48 h (cf. Fig. 3 and Supplementary Table 2). The maximum change in cathode potential was 193 mV observed for CoP in the setup using M. maripaludis, while NiMo showed the highest stability with potential changes as low as 60 mV (cf. Supplementary Table 2). An increase in reduction potential under constant current conditions could be caused by blocking of active sites on the HER catalyst surface in the biological system. Microscopy studies did not find evidence for attachment of microbial cells to any of the tested, flat-surface cathodes (data not shown). To investigate potential surface contamination introduced through media supplements or microbial activity, XPS survey and high-resolution scans of the electrode materials were performed before and after the operation in the integrated bioelectrochemical system. All three materials showed significant accumulation of various elements after the biotic experiments (cf. Supplementary Table 3). Interestingly, however, HER activity and selectivity were retained despite these accumulations, indicating a good stability of the catalytic activity for HER even in highly supplemented electrolytes. Further, the stable selectivity for H2 as single product conferred outright biocompatibility, and no negative effect on the tested bacteria and archaea on growth or metabolism was observed. This identifies the tested materials CoP, MoS2, and NiMo as promising cathode materials for direct integration in hydrogen-driven bioelectrochemical systems.

Long-term performance

To test for robustness and long-term stability, we operated the integrated reactor system using a NiMo cathode and M. maripaludis for 10 days (cf. Fig. 4). When the substrate CO2 was nearly depleted after 65 h, the reactor headspace was exchanged to remove CH4 and to re-supply gaseous CO2 (indicated by vertical dashed lines in Fig. 4); the growth medium was not exchanged, and both catalysts, inorganic NiMo, and biologic M. maripaludis remained in the reactor. We continued this operation for a total of four cycles. The results demonstrated a repeatable and stable performance of both catalysts at consistently high coulombic efficiency for methane production from CO2 utilizing the electrochemically produced hydrogen for a period of 10 days (see Fig. 4). Coulombic efficiencies were again close to 100% throughout the first three cycles. During the fourth cycle, a slight hydrogen accumulation in the gas phase was noted, which lowered the electron to product recovery to about 95%. This is likely due to a decrease in microbial activity as medium supplements such as vitamins, trace elements, or reducing agent may have been depleted.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Long-term performance. Long-term performance of an integrated bioelectrochemical reactor using an NiMo cathode and Methanococcus maripaludis. Electrons were supplied as constant current of 1 mA cm−2 and total electrode surface was 1 mA. The product methane was measured in the gas phase of the reactor and is plotted as electron equivalents. Every 65 h, the reactor headspace was exchanged to remove CH4 and to re-supply gaseous CO2 indicated by vertical dashed lines. Dotted line: electrons; hollow triangles: hydrogen; red cycles: methane; solid triangles: cathode potential vs SHE

Notably, the HER performance of the NiMo cathode showed very good repeatability over multiple reaction cycles with no evidence of irreversible deactivation. Conventional HER works best at either very high or very low pH, because the concentration of proton donors and/or electrolyte conductivity is maximized48. It was shown that at neutral pH, alternative earth-abundant catalysts are able to achieve HER rates comparable to platinum or even outperform platinum-based materials48,49,50. Long-term stability, however, remains a major challenge in these systems. Here, the demonstrated stability over 245 h in highly supplemented electrolyte at neutral pH is therefore particularly promising.

Microbial electrosynthesis beyond known electroactive microbes

In previous studies, only a limited number of microbial species were identified to be able to accept electrons directly derived from a cathode for CO2 reduction in a process called direct electron transport (DET)21 while a significant number of microbes were reported to be deficient of DET18,21. As the above experiments demonstrated, the use of transition-metal-based cathodes enabled efficient direct integration of microbial electrosynthesis from CO2 and electricity via in situ produced H2, thereby circumventing the limiting necessity of a direct microbe–cathode interaction. Therefore, we hypothesized that an H2-mediated system would enable the cultivation of any microbe capable of metabolic H2-reduction, including microorganisms categorized as “electro-inactive”. To test this hypothesis, we used the homoacetogen Acetobacterium woodii, reported to be incapable of DET21, in our integrated reactor system and observed stable acetate production (see Fig. 5). Similarly to the experiments with S. ovata and M. maripaludis, hydrogen was taken up and converted into acetate at coulombic efficiency of near 100%. No toxic effects of the catalyst material towards the microorganism were observed, and, again, the inorganic cathode seemed resistant to biofouling.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Electric production by a non-electroactive microbe. Demonstration of acetate production in a directly integrated bioelectrochemical system by the homoacetogen Acetobacterium woodii, known to be incapable of DET21. Electrons were supplied via a NiMo cathode at constant current density of 1 mA cm−2. Electrolyte was microbial growth medium modified-DSMZ-135. The product acetate was measured in the liquid phase of the reactor and is plotted as electron equivalents. Dotted line: electrons; hollow triangles: hydrogen; yellow diamonds: acetate; solid triangles: cathode potential vs SHE. Error bars represent standard deviation between biological triplicates

Collectively, these results indicate a promising potential for the use of transition-metal-based cathodes for H2-driven bioelectrochemical systems for production of organic chemicals. The ability to use potentially any autotrophic microorganism in such one-reactor bioelectrochemical system with electricity and CO2 as the only inputs would significantly expand the microbial platforms and their synthetic capacities for microbial electrosynthesis.


Here, we demonstrated a robust and efficient, integrated bioelectrochemical platform for highly selective production of organic compounds from CO2 using earth-abundant transition-metal-based cathodes. The observed long-term stability of H2 production on CoP, MoS2, and NiMo cathodes, despite the accumulation of organic and inorganic material on the electrode surface, demonstrates the potential of this technology to be usable at industrially relevant time scales. Thus, this integrated system provides a robust and scalable pathway to combine electrochemical catalysis and the high selectivity and stability of biological systems. Moreover, the successful integration utilizing the “electro-inactive” A. woodii established this system as a platform for many more H2-utilizing, CO2-reducing microorganisms. The herein demonstrated production of acetate and methane at high selectivity, rate, and stability can be considered as an entry point for production of a range of industrially relevant chemicals. With the current rapid development of tools for genetic engineering and systems biology, it is expected that both commodity and higher value organic chemicals can be produced in the near future via this platform15,16,51,52,53, which is based only on an electron supply via biocompatible cathodes, electricity, CO2, and microorganisms.


Electrode fabrication

Transition-metal-based cathodes were fabricated as flat films on silicon substrates via the following methods. CoP and MoS2 were prepared as previously described using physical vapor deposition followed by phosphidation or sulfidation, respectively40,54,55. For preparation of CoP, ~50 nm of Co was evaporated onto a clean, degenerately doped n-type Si wafer. Subsequently the samples were phosphidized at elevated temperatures in a multi-zone furnace using red phosphorus as a precursor upstream with H2 gas flowing. For preparation of MoS2, ~3.6 nm of Mo was sputtered onto a clean degenerately doped p-type Si wafer and subsequently sulfidized at 250˚C for 1 h while flowing an H2/H2S gas mixture. Platinum and NiMo layers were prepared directly by physical vapor deposition onto clean, degenerately doped Si wafer substrates. The NiMo was achieved using dual-source, co-evaporation of Ni and Mo. The resulting coatings were of approximate thickness of 100 nm. Based on the film thickness, planar area, and density of the crystal structure we estimate the following specific loadings: Co in CoP: 4.4 × 10−2 mg cm−2 Co; Mo in MoS2: 3.7 × 10−3 mg cm−2 Mo; Pt: 2.15 × 10−1 mg cm−2 Pt, and NiMo: 9.6 × 10−2 mg cm−2 NiMo.

The material was cut into 1 cm2 pieces and contacted on the backside to a titanium wire, thickness 0.7 mm, with conductive epoxy (Chemtronics CW2400), resulting in an electrical connection with less than 2 Ω resistance. The connection and entire backside was covered with medical grade epoxy (Loctite, EA M-121HP), leaving only the deposited film as active surface. All fabricated electrodes were stored in a desiccator under vacuum for a maximum time of 2 weeks. A photograph of the electrodes is given in Supplementary Figure 1.

Microbial strains and growth conditions

M. maripaludis (wild-type strain MM90156) was cultured on modified DSMZ medium 141, omitting Na-acetate, yeast extract, trypticase, Na-resazurin, and buffered with 100 mM morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (MOPS) at pH 7. S. ovata (wild-type strain DSM 3300) was cultured on modified DSMZ medium 879 omitting fructose and Na-resazurin, and buffered with 100 mM 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES) at pH 5.9. A. woodii (wild-type strain DSM 1030) was cultured on modified DSMZ medium 135 omitting fructose and Na-resazurin, and buffered with 100 mM MOPS at pH 7. In both media, modified DSMZ879 and modified DSMZ135, the yeast extract content was reduced to 1 g L−1. Further, in all media Na2S was omitted (to avoid stripping of gaseous H2S), while the concentration of l-cysteine was doubled to ensure reduced conditions. Cultures were routinely grown under CO2/H2 (20/80% v/v) gas atmosphere. Cultures were inoculated with 2% (v/v) of an exponentially growing culture and grown at 30 °C and 200 r.p.m. For bioelectrochemical experiments, cells were harvested in the late exponential phase at an optical density (OD600) of 0.35–0.45, twice pelleted (5000 r.p.m., 5 min, 30 °C), and resuspended in fresh medium under anaerobic conditions.

For all different microbe species tested in this study and for every media employed here, no growth or production of methane/acetate was observed in the absence of either H2 or a negatively poised cathode, indicating that a small amount of yeast extract or other media components were not sufficient to support growth and/or product formation.

Integrated bioelectrochemical system

The bioelectrochemical reactors are customized two-chambered borosilicate gastight H-cells (Adams & Chittenden, Scientific Glass, Berkeley, CA, USA). The two chambers have a volume of 150 mL each and were separated by a Nafion 117 proton-exchange membrane (Fuel Cell Store Inc., College Station, TX, USA, surface area 7.5 cm2). The membrane prevents the transfer of oxygen into the cathode chamber to ensure anaerobic conditions and to prevent the formation of reactive oxygen species at the cathode as reported previously34. Each chamber was filled with 100 mL electrolyte under anaerobic conditions (bicarbonate buffer or growth medium, depending on experiment), magnetically stirred at 200 r.p.m., and the gas atmosphere was CO2/N2 (20/80% v/v). In each chamber the electrode was inserted via a gastight rubber stopper from the top of the bottle, while an additional Ag/AgCl reference electrode (NaCl saturated; RE-5B, BASI) was inserted into the cathode chamber via a rubber stopper side port. As anode, a platinized titanium mesh (1″ × 4″, TWL, was used and the cathode was a 1 cm2 electrode of the studied cathode materials, fabricated as reported above. Electrochemical experiments were run as constant current or constant potential using a multichannel potentiostat (VMP3; Bio-Logic Science Instruments, Seyssinet-Pariset, France). Before each experiment, the resistance of the setup was determined via electrochemical impedance spectroscopy as standard procedure with subsequent correction of the measured electrode potentials via EC-Lab software (version 11.21, Bio-Logic Science Instruments). All potentials indicated in this article are relative to SHE.

The electrochemical reactors were operated in a temperature-controlled room at 30 °C. Each experiment was started with a fresh, unused cathode. For bioelectrochemical experiments, microbial cultures were added as concentrated, washed cell suspensions to a start OD600 of 0.2 inside the cathode chamber. Each experiment was performed as a closed batch system in three independent, biological replicates.

Analytical methods

The gaseous compounds methane and hydrogen were measured using a gas chromatograph (equipped with a thermal conductivity detector and a flame ionization detection detector) as described previously57. Acetate and other liquid metabolites were measured via high-performance liquid chromatography equipped with an organic acid column as described previously57. To allow comparison of electron uptake rates during the formation of different target products and to visualize electron to product recovery, concentrations of H2, CH4, and acetate are given as electron equivalents by multiplying the measured concentrations of the respective compound by the number of electrons required for its formation.

Coulombic efficiencies were calculated by dividing the electrons recovered in products by the electrons supplied as current at a certain time point.

Hydrogen profiles using microsensor measurements

Concentration profiles of H2 were recorded with commercially available H2 microsensors (Unisense A/S) and H2 microsensors with a sulfide frontguard. The H2 microsensors had a tip size of 20–40 µm and a sensitivity of 0.8–1.2 pA µM−1. The H2 microsensors were connected to a picoamperemeter, which was connected to an AD-converter connected to a computer. When profiling the microsensors were mounted in a motorized micromanipulator controlled by the software Sensortrace Pro (Unisense A/S) that also recorded the microsensor signals.

Profiling in the bioelectrochemical reactors was achieved by introducing the microsensor through a hole in the rubber stopper lid, which allowed for automated movement of the sensor. To ensure anoxic conditions, the headspace was constantly flushed with anoxic gas: CO2/N2 (20/80% v/v). Except for the microsensor insertion and headspace flushing, the reactor setup was identical to the description above. Profiles were recorded from the gas phase down to the cathode surface at 500 µm steps while detailed profiles at the cathode surface were recorded with 50 µm steps. Profiling ceased when a change in the sensor signal indicated that the sensor was touching the cathode surface. In the recorded profiles, the last measurement point unaffected by cathode surface contact was defined as first point within 50 µm of the cathode surface. Recorded profiles are summarized in Supplementary Fig. 3.

Cathode surface characterization

The characterization of surface compositions of the cathodes before and after electrochemical reactions was performed via XPS. The measurements were collected on a Phi Versaprobe III instrument using high-power mode to collect survey scans with charge neutralization enabled after Ar gas-cluster cleaning to partially remove excess organics from the surface. Acquired spectra were quantified using the Multipak software package and presented in a summary format in Supplementary Table 3.

Data availability

The authors declare that all the other data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary information files and from the corresponding author upon request.


  1. Aresta, M. Carbon Dioxide as Chemical Feedstock (John Wiley & Sons, Weinheim, Germany 2010).

  2. Harnisch, F., Rosa, L. F., Kracke, F., Virdis, B. & Krömer, J. O. Electrifying white biotechnology: engineering and economic potential of electricity‐driven bio‐production. ChemSusChem 8, 758–766 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bushuyev, O. S. et al. What should we make with CO2 and howow can we make it? Joule 2, 825–832 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Durst, J. et al. Electrochemical CO2 reduction—a critical view on fundamentals, materials and applications. CHIMIA Int. J. Chem. 69, 769–776 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hori, Y. I. in Modern Aspects of Electrochemistry 89–189 (Springer, Berlin, 2008).

  6. Ma, S. & Kenis, P. J. Electrochemical conversion of CO2 to useful chemicals: current status, remaining challenges, and future opportunities. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 2, 191–199 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kortlever, R., Shen, J., Schouten, K. J. P., Calle-Vallejo, F. & Koper, M. T. Catalysts and reaction pathways for the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 4073–4082 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Möller, T. et al. Efficient CO2 to CO electrolysis on solid Ni–N–C catalysts at industrial current densities. Energy Environ. Sci. 12, 640–647 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Verma, S., Kim, B., Jhong, H. R. M., Ma, S. & Kenis, P. J. A gross‐margin model for defining technoeconomic benchmarks in the electroreduction of CO2. ChemSusChem 9, 1972–1979 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Weber, R. S. Effective use of renewable electricity for making renewable fuels and chemicals. ACS Catal. 9, 946–950 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu, B., Zhang, L., Xiong, W. & Ma, M. Cobalt‐nanocrystal‐assembled hollow nanoparticles for electrocatalytic hydrogen generation from neutral‐pH water. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 6725–6729 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sun, Y. et al. Electrodeposited cobalt-sulfide catalyst for electrochemical and photoelectrochemical hydrogen generation from water. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 17699–17702 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cobo, S. et al. A Janus cobalt-based catalytic material for electro-splitting of water. Nat. Mater. 11, 802–807 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Xiu, S. et al. Hydrogen‐mediated electron transfer in hybrid microbial‐inorganic system and application in energy and environment. Energy Technol. (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dürre, P. & Eikmanns, B. J. C1-carbon sources for chemical and fuel production by microbial gas fermentation. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 35, 63–72 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Woo, J. E., Song, S. M., Lee, S. Y. & Jang, Y.-S. in Consequences of Microbial Interactions with Hydrocarbons, Oils, and Lipids: Production of Fuels and Chemicals (ed. Sang Yup Lee) 1–16 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland 2017).

  17. Lovley, D. R. & Nevin, K. P. Electrobiocommodities: powering microbial production of fuels and commodity chemicals from carbon dioxide with electricity. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 24, 385–390 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kracke, F., Vassilev, I. & Krömer, J. O. Microbial electron transport and energy conservation—the foundation for optimizing bioelectrochemical systems. Front. Microbiol. 6, 575 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cheng, S., Xing, D., Call, D. F. & Logan, B. E. Direct biological conversion of electrical current into methane by electromethanogenesis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 3953–3958 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ganigué, R., Puig, S., Batlle-Vilanova, P., Balaguer, M. D. & Colprim, J. Microbial electrosynthesis of butyrate from carbon dioxide. Chem. Commun. 51, 3235–3238 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nevin, K. P. et al. Electrosynthesis of organic compounds from carbon dioxide is catalyzed by a diversity of acetogenic microorganisms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 2882–2886 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vassilev, I. et al. Microbial electrosynthesis of isobutyric, butyric, caproic acids and corresponding alcohols from carbon dioxide. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 6, 8485–8493 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Arends, J. B., Patil, S. A., Roume, H. & Rabaey, K. Continuous long-term electricity-driven bioproduction of carboxylates and isopropanol from CO2 with a mixed microbial community. J. CO2 Utilization 20, 141–149 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rabaey, K., Girguis, P. & Nielsen, L. K. Metabolic and practical considerations on microbial electrosynthesis. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 22, 371–377 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zeng, M. & Li, Y. Recent advances in heterogeneous electrocatalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 14942–14962 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Haas, T., Krause, R., Weber, R., Demler, M. & Schmid, G. Technical photosynthesis involving CO2 electrolysis and fermentation. Nat. Catal. 1, 32–39 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ramachandriya, K. D. et al. Carbon dioxide conversion to fuels and chemicals using a hybrid green process. Appl. Energy 112, 289–299 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Torella, J. P. et al. Efficient solar-to-fuels production from a hybrid microbial-water-splitting catalyst system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 2337–2342 (2015).

  29. Takors, R. et al. Using gas mixtures of CO, CO2 and H2 as microbial substrates: the do’s and don’ts of successful technology transfer from laboratory to production scale. Microb. Bbiotechnol. 11, 606–625 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bajracharya, S. et al. Biotransformation of carbon dioxide in bioelectrochemical systems: state of the art and future prospects. J. Power Sources 356, 256–273 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang, T. et al. Improved cathode materials for microbial electrosynthesis. Energy Environ. Sci. 6, 217–224 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Nie, H. et al. Improved cathode for high efficient microbial-catalyzed reduction in microbial electrosynthesis cells. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 14290–14294 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gimkiewicz, C., Hegner, R., Gutensohn, M. F., Koch, C. & Harnisch, F. Study of electrochemical reduction of CO2 for future use in secondary microbial electrochemical technologies. ChemSusChem 10, 958–967 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Liu, C., Colón, B. C., Ziesack, M., Silver, P. A. & Nocera, D. G. Water splitting–biosynthetic system with CO2 reduction efficiencies exceeding photosynthesis. Science 352, 1210–1213 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Eftekhari, A. Electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42, 11053–11077 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yuan, H. & He, Z. Platinum group metal-free catalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction in microbial electrolysis cells. Chem. Rec. 17, 641–652 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Vesborg, P. C. & Jaramillo, T. F. Addressing the terawatt challenge: scalability in the supply of chemical elements for renewable energy. RSC Adv. 2, 7933–7947 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Miao, J. et al. Hierarchical Ni-Mo-S nanosheets on carbon fiber cloth: a flexible electrode for efficient hydrogen generation in neutral electrolyte. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500259 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Strmcnik, D. et al. Improving the hydrogen oxidation reaction rate by promotion of hydroxyl adsorption. Nat. Chem. 5, 300–306 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Landers, A. T. et al. The predominance of hydrogen evolution on transition metal sulfides and phosphides under CO2 reduction conditions: an experimental and theoretical study. ACS Energy Lett. 3, 1450–1457 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Cave, E. R. et al. Trends in the catalytic activity of hydrogen evolution during CO2 electroreduction on transition metals. ACS Catal. 8, 3035–3040 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang, Y.-J., Sethuraman, V., Michalsky, R. & Peterson, A. A. Competition between CO2 reduction and H2 evolution on transition-metal electrocatalysts. ACS Catal. 4, 3742–3748 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Shinagawa, T. & Takanabe, K. Electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution under densely buffered neutral pH conditions. J. Phys. Chem. C 119, 20453–20458 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Jeremiasse, A. W., Hamelers, H. V., Kleijn, J. M. & Buisman, C. J. Use of biocompatible buffers to reduce the concentration overpotential for hydrogen evolution. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 6882–6887 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Deutzmann, J., Sahin, M. & Spormann, A. Extracellular enzymes facilitate electron uptake in biocorrosion and bioelectrosynthesis. MBio 6, e00496–00415 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Nielsen, M., Larsen, L. H., Ottosen, L. D. M. & Revsbech, N. P. Hydrogen microsensors with hydrogen sulfide traps. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 215, 1–8 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Yasin, M. et al. Microbial synthesis gas utilization and ways to resolve kinetic and mass-transfer limitations. Bioresour. Technol. 177, 361–374 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Roger, I., Shipman, M. A. & Symes, M. D. Earth-abundant catalysts for electrochemical and photoelectrochemical water splitting. Nat. Rev. Chem. 1, 0003 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Harnisch, F., Sievers, G. & Schröder, U. Tungsten carbide as electrocatalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction in pH neutral electrolyte solutions. Appl. Catal. Environ. 89, 455–458 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Callejas, J. F. et al. Electrocatalytic and photocatalytic hydrogen production from acidic and neutral-pH aqueous solutions using iron phosphide nanoparticles. ACS Nano 8, 11101–11107 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Daniell, J., Nagaraju, S., Burton, F., Köpke, M. & Simpson, S. D. in Anaerobes in Biotechnology (eds.) Hatti-Kaul R., Mamo G. and Mattiasson B. 293–321 (Springer, Berlin, 2016).

  52. Marcellin, E. et al. Low carbon fuels and commodity chemicals from waste gases–systematic approach to understand energy metabolism in a model acetogen. Green Chem. 18, 3020–3028 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Schiel-Bengelsdorf, B. & Dürre, P. Pathway engineering and synthetic biology using acetogens. Febs Lett. 586, 2191–2198 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Hellstern, T. R., Benck, J. D., Kibsgaard, J., Hahn, C. & Jaramillo, T. F. Engineering cobalt phosphide (CoP) thin film catalysts for enhanced hydrogen evolution activity on silicon photocathodes. Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1501758 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Benck, J. D. et al. Designing active and stable silicon photocathodes for solar hydrogen production using molybdenum sulfide nanomaterials. Adv. Energy Mater. 4, 1400739 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Costa, K. C. et al. Protein complexing in a methanogen suggests electron bifurcation and electron delivery from formate to heterodisulfide reductase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 11050–11055 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Lohner, S. T., Deutzmann, J. S., Logan, B. E., Leigh, J. & Spormann, A. M. Hydrogenase-independent uptake and metabolism of electrons by the archaeon Methanococcus maripaludis. ISME J. 8, 1673–1681 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors thank Alan T. Landers, Laurie A. King, and Thomas R. Hellstern of the Jaramillo lab for their contribution to the synthesis of cathode materials. XPS characterization of electrodes was performed at the Stanford Nano Shared Facilities (SNSF), supported by the National Science Foundation under award EECS-1542152. This work was supported by a GCEP grant (Stanford) and a grant by Department of Energy, Laboratory Directed Research and Development program at SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, (DE-AC02–76SF00515) to T.F.J. and A.M.S.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



F.K. fabricated the electrodes, designed, and performed the experiments in the abiotic as well as integrated bio-electrochemical system, analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript. A.B.W. performed physical vapor deposition for electrode synthesis and performed and analyzed all XPS measurements. K.M. performed the microsensor measurements and analyzed the data. M.A.H. assisted in electrode fabrication. F.K., A.B.W., J.S.D., C.H., T.F.H. and A.M.S. conceived and designed the study and contributed in regular data analyzes and discussions. All authors edited, read, and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alfred M. Spormann.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kracke, F., Wong, A.B., Maegaard, K. et al. Robust and biocompatible catalysts for efficient hydrogen-driven microbial electrosynthesis. Commun Chem 2, 45 (2019).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing