Chemosensation (olfaction, taste) is essential for detecting and assessing foods, such that dietary shifts elicit evolutionary changes in vertebrate chemosensory genes. The transition from hunting and gathering to agriculture dramatically altered how humans acquire food. Recent genetic and linguistic studies suggest agriculture may have precipitated olfactory degeneration. Here, we explore the effects of subsistence behaviors on olfactory (OR) and taste (TASR) receptor genes among rainforest foragers and neighboring agriculturalists in Africa and Southeast Asia. We analyze 378 functional OR and 26 functional TASR genes in 133 individuals across populations in Uganda (Twa, Sua, BaKiga) and the Philippines (Agta, Mamanwa, Manobo) with differing subsistence histories. We find no evidence of relaxed selection on chemosensory genes in agricultural populations. However, we identify subsistence-related signatures of local adaptation on chemosensory genes within each geographic region. Our results highlight the importance of culture, subsistence economy, and drift in human chemosensory perception.
Transitions from hunting and gathering to agricultural food production were formative events during human history, beginning 11.5 kya and occurring independently in multiple geographic regions1,2. Agricultural foodways have fueled profound changes––to human environments, behavior, health, and social structure3,4,5, but also dietary ecology, resulting in diminished food diversity and shifts in the types and proportions of nutrients consumed5,6,7. Mounting evidence from studies of modern and ancient human populations point to attendant selective pressures on the sequences and diversity of genes underlying digestion, metabolism and growth8,9,10,11,12,13, sometimes convergently between agricultural origin centers7,8,10,11. But the effects of agriculturalization on the human sensorium are understudied despite the essential role of chemosensation (olfaction, taste) during food detection and assessment (e.g., identifying fruit ripeness, the presence of toxins, or spoilage)7,14,15,16,17,18,19,20.
Shifts in feeding behavior appear to drive changes in the olfactory receptor (OR) and taste receptor (TASR) genes of some species21,22,23,24,25, which raises the possibility of similar differentiation between human populations. Transitions from forest-foraging to agriculturalism are expected to exert selective pressure on human chemosensory genes for at least two reasons. First, farming clears land in a way that reduces humidity and increases temperatures at ground-level, which increases convective air turbulence and hinders chemotaxis (detection and movement toward odorants)26,27. Second, agriculturalists are more sedentary and reliant on a subset of available foods, mostly domesticates6, which limits their exposure to available chemosensory stimuli in the natural environment. Farming may therefore accompany a relaxation of natural selection, leading to impoverished chemosensory gene repertoires. Conversely, rainforest foragers are expected to retain greater numbers of functional OR genes for enhanced odor detection and discrimination16,28,29. Exemplifying this pattern are language studies––the diversity of olfactory words and expressions is striking in the languages of some rainforest foragers30, as are their abilities to name odors relative to nearby agriculturalists speaking closely-related languages31,32. Taste sensitivities can also differ between rainforest foragers and neighboring farmers33, and there is growing evidence of diet-driven haplotype variability at local scales8,10,11,34. Yet when comparative studies of TASR genes have included foraging and farming peoples, the focus has been limited to single genes or a few gene regions15,29,35,36,37, rather than a wider genomic-scale approach. Further, there was little effort to compare adjacent populations of foragers and farmers.
We have conducted recurring community-based participatory research since 2008. Our work in Uganda and the Philippines has been focused on Indigenous knowledge systems, belonging, and restorative justice among neighboring communities with different subsistence economies and histories (Fig. 1). This background motivated us to sequence the chemosensory gene repertoires (378 OR genes, 2 TAS1R genes, 24 TAS2R genes) of 133 individuals across six populations. Four of the populations – the Agta, Mamanwa, Sua, and Twa – turned increasingly, but at different moments and to varying degrees, toward agricultural foodways during the last century (Supplementary Note 1). We will refer to these populations as ‘traditional foragers’ to distinguish them from the long-term agriculturalists in our study, the BaKiga and Manobo (Supplementary Note 1). Although the word ‘traditional’ risks accusations of essentialism—or freezing people in “a simulacrum of pastness,” as Rifkin38 put it—it best represents the lived experiences or collective memories of most study participants. This geographic-neighbors study design in Africa and Asia has two advantages. It accounts for higher levels of genetic diversity within Africans relative to non-Africans29,39 and provides independent tests on the effects of parallel transitions toward agriculturalism.
Here we ask two complementary questions. First, does agriculturalism relax the selective constraints acting on chemosensory genes as evidenced by relatively higher frequencies of pseudogenes? And second, do signatures of positive selection or local adaptation exist as a function of subsistence history in one or both geographic regions, as determined using cross-population population differentiation based tests? Our overarching objective is to improve our understanding of human sensory evolution and perception.
Is agriculturalism associated with a relaxation of selective constraint on chemosensory genes?
We employed two approaches to investigate the impact of subsistence strategy on the selective constraint acting on chemosensory gene repertoires. First, we examined patterns of gene loss-of-function (LOF) mutations. We identified 235 LOF variants (SNPs, indels) across 161 OR genes and 17 LOF variants across 12 TASR loci (Supplementary Data S1). We found that 76 (30%) of the LOF variants are shared between populations from Uganda and the Philippines, however, 4.7 times more LOF variants are specific to the populations from Uganda (n = 142) than specific to populations in the Philippines (n = 33) (Fig. 2A). In contrast to the higher number of variants, we found that on average, individuals from Asia have a higher number of homozygous, putatively non-functioning, chemosensory genes (11.78) than individuals from Africa (8.22) (one-tailed Wilcoxon Test, W = 3505, p < 0.000001) (Fig. 2B, C). It is important to note that our analysis assumes a model of recessive deleterious alleles, such that heterozygotes are not considered to have lost gene function, and that we likely underestimated the number of homozygous LOF genotypes due to the relatively high level of false-negatives in our variant calling pipeline. However, our results should be unbiased to any particular population/subsistence history and hence provide a global overlook to the diversity of perception genes across the globe.
Under relaxed selection, we would expect a higher number of homozygous LOF variants, on average, in populations with a deeper history of agriculturalism compared to traditional foraging in each geographic region. Overall, however, the number of functional genes did not show clear and consistent differentiation between the agriculturalists and traditional foragers (Fig. 2C). Specifically, in Africa, individuals from the agricultural and traditional foraging populations carry on average 8.02 and 8.58 homozygous LOF variants, respectively, with no significant difference (one-tailed Wilcoxon Test, W = 670, p = 0.233). We similarly found no significant difference when separately comparing the number of homozygous LOF variants between BaKiga and the Sua (W = 306, p = 0.483) or the BaKiga and the Twa (W = 364, p = 0.193). In Asia, individuals from the agricultural and traditional foraging populations did significantly differ in the number of homozygous LOF variants (W = 313.5, p = 0.028), with the traditional foraging populations carrying on average 12.43 homozygous LOF variants versus the agriculturalist’s 10.71 homozygous LOF variants. When compared separately, neither the Agta (W = 334, p = 0.062) nor the Mamanwa (W = 288.5, p = 0.066) significantly differed in the number of homozygous LOF variants relative to the Manobo. However, the difference in homozygous LOF load between continental African and Asian populations (Fig. 2B) is nearly twice that between Philippine foragers and agriculturalists. Subsistence history was also not significant in explaining the number of homozygous LOF genes carried per individual using a linear mixed effects model (p = 0.259), which controls for variation in the number of genes called per individual, population, and continent of origin. While some segregating LOF variants do show differences between agriculturalist and traditional foraging populations within continents (Fig. 2D, Supplementary Note 2), the majority of variance in the distribution of homozygous LOF variants is shaped by continental ancestry rather than subsistence history.
For our second approach, we calculated Tajima’s D values40 for each population to directly test the hypothesis of differing levels of relaxed versus purifying selection associated with subsistence history (Fig. 3). Negative Tajima’s D values indicate purifying selection. However, this measure is affected by demographic history as well. Thus, we tested whether Tajima’s D values for chemosensory intervals show significantly lower values than neutral intervals for traditional foragers, but not agriculturalists. We found no significant differences in Tajima’s D between the chemosensory and putatively neutral intervals for any population (Fig. 3), suggesting that similar selective forces are acting on the chemoperception genes across populations. Hence, the observed differences in the distribution of Tajima’s D values between populations in the Philippines and Uganda are likely due to recent population expansion and bottleneck events, respectively. Together, the results of LOF and Tajima’s D analyses suggest that there are no genome-wide trends of differential selection acting on OR or TASR genes between populations due to subsistence history. To understand overall genetic variation shaped by demographic history, we also calculated genome-wide nucleotide variation (π) (Supplementary Fig. S1). We observed, as expected, similar π values among populations from the same geography (Uganda vs. Philippines). We further found that Ugandan populations have higher nucleotide diversity independent of their subsistence histories. These results further support the interpretation that the variation we observed in these populations are likely a product of different demographic histories, rather than population-specific adaptation.
Has subsistence strategy influenced positive selection on chemosensory genes?
We performed population branch statistics (PBS)41 to search for signatures of recent positive selection on chemosensory genes, identifying SNPs that show unusually high allele frequency in the agriculturalist populations relative to the traditional foraging populations as well as those SNPs that show unusually high allele frequencies in the traditional foraging populations. We used empirical tests to detect chemosensory SNPs that significantly diverged from neutral expectations (Fig. 4). After correcting for multiple testing using the false discovery rate, we detected 17 SNPs in 8 genes that significantly differed from neutral expectations in the Ugandan agriculturalist population and 8 SNPs in 3 genes that differed in the traditional foraging populations in Uganda (Supplementary Table S1). In Philippine populations, 2 SNPs in 2 genes and 16 SNPs in 13 genes significantly differed from neutral expectations in the agricultural and traditional foraging populations, respectively (Supplementary Table S2). Many of these genes (15 out of 26) have been identified in previous positive and/or local selection scans in humans (Supplementary Tables S1 and S2). Furthermore, several have been linked to specific phenotypic effects in previous studies, including agonizts, food preferences, food intake, or obesity (Supplementary Tables S1 and S2). We next conducted a PheWAS search to explore significant trait associations for these putatively adaptive SNPs using the UK Biobank Gene Atlas and the GWAS Atlas. We identified significant trait associations for 35 of the 43 total SNPs, including particularly relevant traits such as “processed meat intake”, “coffee/tea intake”, “fresh fruit intake”, and “bread intake” (Supplementary Tables S3 and S4). Additionally, 33 SNPs are physically close (within 1 Mb of each other) and likely represent ten haplotype blocks (Supplementary Table S5). We note that these haplotype blocks are likely incomplete as our capture method only detects a subset of mostly exonic SNPs. Hence, the lengths of the haplotypes should be extrapolated using other, more comprehensive datasets.
We targeted six of these putative haplotype blocks with clear phenotype associations for further investigation (Table 1). Using 5008 haplotypes from the 1000 Genomes Project data, we first confirmed the high linkage disequilibrium of the SNPs with high PBS values in our dataset to each other (R2 > 0.7).We next explored the evolutionary history of the SNPs in these haploblocks using ages available through Human Genome Dating database (Table 1). The target SNP in 5 of these 6 haploblocks is relatively ancient (~619 Kyr to 1.47 Myr), predating the origin of anatomically modern humans. Only one SNP and haploblock (rs12360890, OR5T1) evolved relatively recently (126 Kyr). While OR5T1 and this specific SNP are associated with age at menarche, other genes in its associated haploblock include tropical adaptation in cattle and a honey/floral odorant (Supplementary Table S5).
Two haploblocks are of particular interest in regards to subsistence strategy given their functional associations in humans (Fig. 5: OR2A5 and TAS2R3/4/5). Both are relatively ancient (727 Kyr and 619 Kyr, respectively). At the ORA25 haploblock (chromosome 7), the ancestral haplotype is associated with a preference for “bread intake” and the derived haplotype associated with a preference for “fruit intake” (Fig. 5A, Supplementary Table S3). The “fruit intake” haplotype is at a much higher frequency in the Ugandan BaKiga agriculturalist population relative to the neighboring Sua and Twa, who were committed hunter-gatherers before the 1990s (Fig. 5B). The TAS2R3/4/5 haploblock is also found on chromosome 7, and is associated with bitterness perception of ethanol and capsaicin42, alcohol consumption, and “adding salt to food” (Fig. 5D, Supplementary Table S5). For three of four neighboring pairs of agriculturalist/foraging populations in our study, the agriculturalists exhibited a higher frequency of the haplotype associated with decreased bitterness perception of ethanol and capsaicin/piperine, increased alcohol consumption, and adding salt to food, while the traditional foraging populations have a higher frequency of the haplotype associated with increased bitter perception of those compounds (Fig. 5E, Table 1). We describe the variation and evolutionary history of both the OR2A5 and TAS2R3/4/5 haploblocks in more detail in the Supplementary Note 3.
Overall, the results of our PBS analyses provide a list of candidate haplotypes and SNPs in OR and TASR genes with strong allele frequency differentiation between neighboring populations with different subsistence histories. These may be worthwhile candidates for future investigation.
In this study, building on our collaborative relationships with foraging peoples in Uganda and the Philippines, we used a geographic-neighbors population genomic approach to investigate how subsistence history has influenced the evolution of chemosensory genes. We sequenced the chemosensory gene repertoire (378 OR genes, 2 TAS1R genes, and 24 TAS2R genes) of 133 individuals across six populations. Overall, we do not find strong evidence in support of previous claims that foraging peoples possess more diverse olfactory receptor gene repertoires. However, we do find evidence of local adaptation via differences in allele frequencies with implications for associated phenotypes. We conclude by highlighting potentially fruitful future directions.
We identified 252 loss-of-function (LOF) variants (SNPS, indels) in the chemosensory gene repertoires across six populations (235 in OR genes, 17 in TASR genes). Previously, researchers have suggested that hunter-gatherers have a higher number of functioning OR genes relative to agriculturalists, which was attributed to higher reliance on olfaction for finding and assessing foods in the former28,29,36. We found no evidence of this in our study. Among the Ugandan populations, there was no significant difference in the number of homozygous LOF variants carried by individuals in agricultural versus traditional foraging populations. We did detect a significant difference in the Philippine populations, however the direction was the reverse direction of our predictions, i.e. higher LOF levels in traditional foragers. Overall, we found that geographic region and not subsistence explained most of the variance in LOF alleles; the total number of LOF variants was higher in the Ugandan populations, while the highest LOF homozygosity was found in Filipino individuals. While it is possible that our study is underpowered, this pattern is consistent with other studies of LOF variants across the genome and is likely associated with serial founder effects following an Out of Africa migration43,44. Thus, drift alone may explain much of the overall distribution of OR and TASR LOF variants. While previous studies found higher numbers of functional ORs in forager populations29,36, these studies were primarily conducted on geographically disparate populations. Our approach permitted a more direct test by comparing populations that are geographical neighbors but diverged in their traditional subsistence strategies.
Our findings have potential implications for understanding the plasticity and development of odor identification. A number of language studies have found that rainforest foragers have a much richer vocabulary of olfactory terms and are better at naming odors than neighboring agriculturalists30,31,32. If our results are generalizable to other foraging populations, it would suggest that these differences in odor vocabulary and identification are not due to physiological differences in the number of different types of olfactory receptors present in foragers. Instead, our results support the Whorfian hypothesis that culture and language can dramatically shape our sensory perception45. A similar effect of language has been observed on color perception and has been the subject of vigorous debate in language and cognition46. Consistent with our results, a 2022 study investigated perceptions of odor pleasantness across nine cultures (including rainforest foragers and agriculturalists) found that ~95% of the variation in pleasantness rankings was associated with individual taste and odorant molecular identity, suggesting a “universal bedrock of olfactory perception” across populations47.
We also identified substantial inter-individual variation in LOF variants, consistent with previous reports of individualized chemosensory gene repertoires and a highly personalized sense of smell48,49,50,51,52. While understanding of TASR variation is growing, in part because of successful laboratory assay systems (e.g. ref. 53), the functional consequences and specific phenotypes associated with OR variation are hard to anticipate because ligands of OR genes are poorly resolved49. OR genes represent one of the largest gene families occurring among mammals and are well known for their rapid pace of evolution24. Future developments in the in vitro expression and assay of OR genes and developments in behavioral assays of characterized individuals will hopefully contribute to phenotypic characterization of this fascinating chemosensory gene family.
Differences in food acquisition methods have long been hypothesized to shape human sensory variation7,8,14,54. We identified genetic variation at 26 genes as potential candidates for local adaptation within each geographic region. We did not find evidence of convergent evolution on specific SNPs across continents. However, this is perhaps unsurprising, given the vastly different plant assemblages, cultivars, and regional flavors characterizing these geographic regions. Interestingly, 16 of the 26 genes (~61%) have been directly linked to food perception or feeding behavior in humans or other animals (e.g., food intake, obesity predisposition, BMI), and 5 other genes are associated with traits often linked with BMI and food intake (“age at menarche”, “comparative body size at age 10”, “height”) (Supplementary Table S6). Taken together, ~81% of the genes identified as being candidates for differential selection between agriculturalists and traditional foragers are associated with food intake in some way. These results may reflect convergent responses to different adaptive pressures associated with food availability between rainforest farming and hunting and gathering. Rainforests are considered food-limited environments for humans, and the short-statured small body size phenotype may be a convergent adaptation to these conditions55,56,57. Because olfaction plays an important role in appetite regulation58, appetite-regulating ORs may be particularly important for rainforest hunter-gatherers in food-limited environments.
Many of the genes we identified (15 of 26) were detected in previous positive selection scans across human populations28,59,60,61 and are promising candidates for comparative analyses. We chose one candidate OR haplotype (OR2A5) and one TASR haplotype (TAS2R3/4/5) to explore here in greater detail. Both haplotypes exhibited signatures of positive selection in the BaKiga agriculturalists relative to the Twa and Sua and are directly associated with food preferences relevant in an agricultural context (i.e., fruit intake, and bitter perception of ethanol and alcohol consumption, respectively). Specifically, we found an increased frequency of the haplotype of OR2A5 associated with fruit intake and the TAS2R3/4/5 haplotype for reduced bitter perception of ethanol in the BaKiga. The increased frequencies of these haplotypes in the BaKiga may reflect different food histories, including the important cultural role of fermentation (such as fermented drinks like obushera) to Ugandan agricultural societies62. These two haplotypes may be particularly promising candidates to explore in adaptations to agriculture in other regions. Both also tended to be higher in the Manobo compared to Philippine foraging communities, although the differences were not as clear. Additionally, both loci have been identified in positive selection scans in dogs63, which - along with other domesticated animals - can exhibit convergent adaptations to agricultural human societies living in similar environments64,65,66. However, while selection pressures on OR and TASR genes are often attributed to foods, it is important to recognize other factors potentially influencing selection on these genes. For example, humans are sensitive to socially and biologically relevant odors67. Further, olfactory and taste receptors also act as “extrasensory” nutrient/toxin detectors in other body systems, such as the gastrointestinal, respiratory, and immune systems68 (extrasensory chemosensors are discussed further in Supplementary Note 4).
Interestingly, our data suggest that variation at both the OR2A5 and TAS2R3/4/5 loci is relatively ancient. For example, the age of the derived TAS2R3/4/5 haplotype (for decreased ethanol bitterness) is estimated at 619 kyr. The ages of the derived haplotype for five of the six haplotypes we explored in more detail pre-date the origin of modern humans69. These data suggest that many of the variants that exhibit allele frequency variation between agriculturalist and traditional foraging populations evolved from standing variation, and their initial emergence and maintenance were not associated with agriculture. Collectively, it is plausible that genetic variation that shapes human perception has mostly evolved prior to out-of-Africa migrations and their allele frequencies were responsive to environmental and cultural adaptations, similar to the model described for genetic variation shaping skin pigmentation70,71.
Collaborations and ethics
The study is part of a larger project that seeks to understand human adaptations to rainforest habitats, which is conducted in collaboration with Makerere University and University of the Philippines, Diliman under formal agreements or memoranda of understanding, and approved by the Research and Ethics Committee, Makerere University Faculty of Medicine (protocol 2009-137), the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology (permit HS 617), the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP), and the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (permit 03-2010). Consent to saliva collection (Oragene Saliva Collection Kit; DNA Genotek, Ottawa, Canada) and genetic analysis occurred at three levels––local government units, indigenous elder members of each settlement or community, and adult individuals––and in close coordination with the Batwa Development Programme, a nongovernmental cultural organization, or regional officers of the NCIP (Region 2, Barbara Garcia; Region 13, Villarica Lumancas). Our protocol for informed consent was also approved by the Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects, Dartmouth College (protocol 22410), the Institutional Review Board, University of California, Santa Cruz (protocol HS0801367), and the Institutional Review Board, University of Chicago (protocol 16986A).
Saliva samples were donated by 158 individuals (Fig. 1) and we extracted genomic DNA following protocols of DNA Genotek, Inc. (Ottawa, Canada) in the Anthropological Genomics Laboratory at Pennsylvania State University. DNA samples were standardized to contain at least 10–25 mg of DNA in each tube. Genomic libraries were constructed by the University of Texas at Austin’s Genomic Sequencing and Analysis Facility.
Target capture and sequencing
We designed custom RNA baits (MYbaits; Arbor Biosciences, Ann Arbor, MI) using autosomal DNA sequence coordinates (Supplementary Data S2) of 840 functional and pseudogenized OR genes collected from the Human Olfactory Data Explorer (HORDE)72 (https://genome.weizmann.ac.il/horde/), TASR gene coordinates from Ensembl (3 TAS1Rs, 30 functional and pseudogenized TAS2Rs), and 69 intergenic regions in the human genome from autosomes using the Neutral Region Explorer73. We performed target capture on genomic libraries using the MYbaits v3 protocol. In brief, we prepared our extracted DNA samples by introducing a hybridization buffer in which RNA baits were added, then introduced a “blocker” mix to allow blockers to hybridize with DNA segments of interest. We denatured our genomic DNA libraries (95 °C, 5 min) and added RNA baits to the libraries for hybridization (16–24 h). After RNA baits were hybridized with DNA libraries, we recovered target DNA by introducing streptadavin-coated magnetic beads to attract the targeted RNA bound to the baits. We initially washed bead-bound libraries with a solution of hybridization reagent, nuclease-free water, and a wash buffer. The libraries were then placed with washing buffer in a water bath (95 °C, 45 min). A magnetic particle collector was used to pull the beads to the bottom of the tubes, after which supernatant was removed. A binding buffer was introduced to the beads, beads were incubated (95 °C, 10 min) resulting in two more steps of “washing” the streptadavin-coated magnetic beads to remove non-targeted library material from the sample. The enriched libraries captured by the magnetic beads were suspended in 30 uL of 10 mM Tris-CI 0.05% TWEEN −20® solution. The captured DNA was amplified at 14 cycles (Activation: 98 °C, 2 min; Denaturation: 98 °C, 20 s; Annealing: 60 °C, 30 s; Extension: 72 °C, 45 s; Final Extension: 72 °C, 5 min; End: 8 °C, ∞) for sequencing. The resulting captured DNA was sent to the University of Calgary’s Core DNA Services for four lanes of sequencing on Illumina’s NextSeq platform.
For each individual, we marked and removed PCR duplicates with Picard Tools (http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/) and aligned reads to the hg19 reference genome using GATK’s HaplotypeCaller74 to generate individual g.vcf files. We next generated a multi-sample g.vcf file by first using GATK’s CombineGVCF to generate a combined g.vcf for all individuals within each population, then GenotypeGVCF (settings: stand_call_conf = 30, -stand_emit_conf = 20) to generate a single g.vcf file from the six populations. Using vcftools75, we filtered all variants by site quality (>30), genotype quality (>20), individual coverage (>50% of sites called/individual), and site coverage (>75% of individuals called/site). We excluded variants on sex chromosomes and variants from four OR genes that have been found to have issues mapping to the reference genome. Three of these genes (OR4C3, OR4C4P, OR4C5) are duplicated at a separate location of the chromosome in non-reference genomes but not in the hg18 reference76, while OR8U1 is suggested to have been recently formed by a deletion event that fused parts of OR8U8 and OR8U9 in some individuals49,77,78.
Validation and quality control
To assess our capture method and potential biases in capture efficacy across different genomic regions that we targeted, we conducted a series of validation and quality checks. These steps are important because both ORs and TASRs reside in regions rich in segmental duplications. Moreover, these gene families are known to be copy number variable among human populations77,79. Even when there is no copy number variation, segmental duplication regions present difficulties because the probes can bind to multiple copies. These regions can also be problematic when sequence reads are aligned, and unique mapping may not be possible80. Because of these factors, we expect the read-depth of these areas to be lower than expected across all individuals. Further, it is plausible that our capture platform may be biased in the capture efficacy, potentially introducing technical noise. We would expect unusually high or low read-depth in all samples in such loci. To address these issues, we calculated read-depth using samtools-1.981 (http://www.htslib.org/doc/samtools-depth.html). First, we screened our data for individuals that have consistently higher read-depth for all loci (Supplementary Figs. S2 and S3). These likely indicate a bias in the capture step for these particular samples. Thus, we excluded 25 such individuals (out of 158 samples) from subsequent analysis. The average read-depth of the remaining samples was 97.4. We next filtered genes in our dataset with unusually low read-depth (<20th percentile read-depth) among all the captured genes (Supplementary Figs. S2 and S4). These loci indicate regions where our capture consistently failed. Following all read-depth filtering (Supplementary Fig. S2), our final analysis dataset includes 51 neutral regions, 808 ORs, and 32 TASRs for 133 individuals (21 Agta, 26 BaKiga, 18 Mamanwa, 24 Manobo, 21 Sua, and 23 Twa individuals).
Variant functional annotation
For each SNP and indel in targeted chemosensory genes and intergenic regions, we used Ensembl’s Variant Effect Predictor (VEP) web server for GRCh3782 to identify the nearest gene (or “intergenic”), gene type (protein-coding, segregating pseudogene, or pseudogene), consequence (e.g., missense, synonymous, stop-gain, stop-lost, splice, intronic, 5’ UTR, 3’ UTR, regulatory, downstream, or upstream), protein position, amino acid, and known variation (RefSNP rsID). For variants where VEP provided more than one annotation due to the presence of multiple transcript isoforms, we followed four steps to select a single annotation: (1) coding region annotations (exonic/intronic/UTR) were prioritized over upstream or downstream; (2) exonic annotations were prioritized over intronic or UTR; (3) sensory genes were prioritized over RNA genes; (4) if multiple transcripts per gene were present, the longest transcript was chosen. OR segregating pseudogenes are fairly common in human populations48,49,50,83,84. These genes are annotated as a “pseudogene” by VEP. Using data from Olender et al.48 and the Human Olfactory Data Explorer (HORDE72), we documented the variants that “rescue” these genes to an active status again and included these variants in our analysis of the number of loss-of-function variants (see below). We also found one OR gene (OR52B1P) that was classified as “protein-coding” by VEP. However, multiple other sources, including Hughes et al.84, HORDE, the University of California Santa Cruz Genome Browser85, and Ensembl GRCh38 consider it a pseudogene, so we categorized it as a pseudogene.
Chemosensory and “putatively neutral” variant datasets
To evaluate signatures of positive selection on chemosensory genes, we first filtered our SNPs into “chemosensory” and “putatively neutral” datasets. For the chemosensory dataset, we filtered SNPs to only include variants in exons and untranslated regions of functional chemosensory genes (coding and segregating pseudogenes). For the putatively neutral dataset, we included biallelic SNPs from targeted intergenic regions and pruned for sites in linkage disequilibrium (r2 threshold = 0.5) using plink86 following Schweizer and colleagues87. We also included in this putatively neutral dataset SNPs from chemosensory regions that were classified by VEP as intergenic, upstream/downstream of functional genes/pseudogenes, introns of pseudogenes, or ancient chemosensory pseudogenes that are presumed to have experienced a long history of neutral evolution. These ancient pseudogenes include 90 OR pseudogenes with premature stop codons shared between modern humans and chimpanzees84, and 2 TASR pseudogenes (TAS2R63P, TAS2R67P) that have been psuedogenized since at least the last common ancestor of hominids (chimpanzees, bonobos, humans)21,88,89. After these filtering steps, we were left with a chemosensory dataset of 4913 SNPs in the exons and untranslated regions of 378 ORs, 2 sweet/umami taste receptor genes (TAS1R1, TAS1R2), and 24 bitter taste receptor genes (TAS2Rs). The putatively neutral dataset included 1704 SNPs.
Assessing overall genetic variation shaped by demographic history
In order to understand overall genetic variation shaped by demographic history, we calculated genome-wide nucleotide variation (π) using the –site-pi option in vcftools75 for the 232 SNPs from targeted neutral intergenic regions with adequate read-depth in each of the six populations: the BaKiga, Sua, and Twa from Uganda, and the Agta, Mamanwa, and Manobo from the Philippines. We then took the π values for each site and reported the average genome-wide value for each population (Supplementary Fig. S1).
Assessing relaxation of selective constraint: potential loss-of-function (LOF) variants
In order to test for a relaxation in selective pressure on chemosensation with agriculture, we specifically targeted potential LOF variants (SNPs, indels) in our chemosensory dataset. We considered SNPs/indels as potential LOF variants by VEP consequence (“stop gained”, “start lost,” “stop lost”, or “frameshift variant”), or if they were previously identified in published lists of pseudogenizing OR in HORDE or published sources83. We also used ALoFT90 to identify frameshift indels that introduce downstream premature stops. We also documented fifteen “rescue” variants (all affecting OR genes). Overall, we documented 235 LOF variants among 161 OR genes, and 17 LOF variants among 12 TASR loci (Supplementary Data S1). We then calculated the number of heterozygous and homozygous LOF mutations in each individual in our sample set. Under relaxed selection, we would expect a higher number of homozygous LOF variants, on average, in agriculturalists relative to traditional foraging populations in both the Philippines and Uganda. While the presence of LOF variants and their heterozygosity are directly affected by effective population sizes, our geographic-neighbors approach provides a less biased comparison. We first performed one-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum tests to compare the number of homozygous LOF variants carried by individuals in traditional foraging versus agriculturalist populations in each continent. Next, we performed a generalized linear mixed effects model with a Poisson distribution, the individual count of homozygous LOF genes as the dependent variable, subsistence history as a fixed effect, the individual’s count of called LOF genes as an offset variable (controlling for individual variation in coverage), and population of origin nested in continent as random effects. The model was performed in R using the lme4 package91 (version 1.1-26).
Assessing relaxation of selective constraint: Tajima’s D
To further test for different levels of negative selection acting on agricultural and rainforest foraging populations, we calculated Tajima’s D40 across 1 kb windows including chemosensory genes for which we have more than 3 SNPs genotyped in all individuals. We also calculated Tajima’s D across whole chromosomes for putatively neutral SNPs. This test measures deviations from the expected allele frequency distribution with negative values indicating selection. Thus, if the strength of purifying selection on chemosensory genes in traditional foraging populations has been stronger than in agriculturalist populations, we expect Tajima’s D values to be smaller in the former than the latter populations when compared to neutral expectations. We used one-tailed Wilcoxon tests to compare Tajima’s D values between chemosensory SNPs and putatively neutral intervals within each population.
Assessing positive selection and local adaptation: population branch statistics
We used population branch statistics (PBS)41 to investigate potential signatures of positive selection on chemosensory genes that aligned with the transition to agriculture or with traditional hunting and gathering in each region. This test assumes that divergent selective pressures acting on different populations will lead to changes in allele frequencies and higher differentiation between populations. PBS measures the relative phylogenetic distances between three populations. Two are the focal populations that we compare to each other and the third is a more distantly related population. Under neutrality, the ratio of phylogenetic distance between these two populations when normalized by the outgroup population should remain constant independent of mutation rate in this locus. Thus, any significant deviation from this expectation may indicate a non-neutral increase in the allele frequency and hence a local adaptation41,92. We calculated PBS for exonic and putatively neutral SNPs for each pairing of agricultural (AGR) and hunter-gatherer (HG) populations in each geographic region, treating one HG population from the other continent as the outgroup population (Agta for Ugandan analyses, Twa for Philippine analyses). Using another HG population as the outgroup rather than an AGR population can better identify candidate genes specifically distinguishing agriculturalists from rainforest HGs. For each population pair, we estimated Fst93 using vcftools between the AGR population and the HG population, the HG and the outgroup, and the AGR and the outgroup. We omitted SNPs that were invariant within each pair of populations. Any “undefined” FST values between one population and the outgroup (due to shared fixation of one of the alleles) was set at 0. We then estimated PBS for the agricultural branch. We set negative PBS values as 0. We performed separate analyses for each focal pair in each region, as well as a third analysis that grouped the two HG populations in the region as a single “population.” We identified outlier SNPs for each focal pair using an empirical p-value approach. Specifically, we calculated a percentile for each exonic SNP relative to the presumed neutral SNPs for that focal pair using the ecdf function in R, then corrected for multiple testing using the false discovery rate. We identified outliers as those SNPs with an adjusted p-value < 0.05. To investigate positive selection associated with rainforest foraging, we repeated these analyses, changing the outgroup to the AGR population from the other continent (e.g., Manobo for Ugandan analyses, BaKiga for Philippine analyses). In total, we performed six analyses per region (three of them using HG as derived, three using AGR as derived). The final number of SNPs for each focal pair was (exonic, presumed neutral): Manobo vs. Agta (2110, 729); Manobo vs. Mamanwa (2008, 680); Manobo vs combined Agta/Mamanwa (2208, 755); BaKiga vs. Sua (3999, 1365); BaKiga vs. Twa (4012, 1372); and BaKiga vs. combined Sua/Twa (4373, 1513).
Phenotype association of SNPs identified through PBS and linkage disequilibrium analyses
To understand the potential functional effects of the putatively adaptive SNPs, we conducted a focused analysis of the potential functional effects of the 43 SNPs identified as outliers in the PBS analyses by conducting a PheWAS search in GWAS Atlas94 and UK Biobank datasets (http://geneatlas.roslin.ed.ac.uk/). In addition, we performed literature searches on each SNP to identify previous work that may link any of these SNPs to functional or evolutionary patterns. We noticed that these SNPs are not randomly distributed across the genome but cluster together and have similar allele frequencies, suggesting that they are in linkage disequilibrium. Specifically, we focused on six haplotype blocks that show significant (p < 10−5) association with perception-related phenotypes. We further managed to cluster the SNPs from the same genomic locations and with similar association signals into haplotype blocks by showing linkage disequilibrium to each other using vcftools with r2 values > 0.65.
Haploblock evolutionary history analysis
To investigate the evolutionary history of the select haplotype blocks, we further analyzed them within the broader context of global human population-level data obtained from 1000 Genomes Phase 3 dataset. We visualized the allele frequency distributions for the haplotypes using the R package rworldmap95. PheWAS associations plots were taken directly from GWAS Atlas. Phylogenetic networks were constructed from phased SNP calls from the 1000 Genomes Project96 as well as Neanderthal97 and Denisovan98 variant calls. We also included Chimpanzee haplotype from the reference genome (PanTro4). In order to integrate data from our own study and 1000 Genomes, we used Illumina HumanOmni1-Quad genotyping array data for the same Twa and BaKiga individuals that we sequenced in this study available from an earlier work56. In brief, the data from this array based study allowed us to extend our linkage disequilibrium analysis to non-coding and intergenic sequences, allowing us to better determine the extent of the haplotype blocks and directly compare with the haplotypic variation in 1000 Genomes dataset. We used plink86 and vcftools to extract our haplotype SNPs from this dataset. We used Picard to perform a liftover from hg18 to hg19 on the BaKiga/Twa vcf files. We phased our.vcf files without a reference dataset using Beagle 5.199. From there we combined the SNP data sets from 1000 Genomes and Twa/BaKiga allowing us to delineate distinct haplotype groups (Supplementary Fig. S5). The alignments were compiled using VCFtoTree100 and visualized using PopART (Population Analysis with Reticulate Trees)101. Haploblock lengths used in tree construction included 21,974 bp (Fig. 5C) and 50,142 bp (Fig. 5F). We used the Human Genome Dating database102 to estimate the age of the SNP in highest linkage disequilibrium for each of the select haploblocks.
Statistics and reproducibility
Most statistics in this study (π, Tajima’s D, Fst, linkage disequilibrium) were calculated in vcftools from g.vcf files, while statistical analyses (Wilcoxon rank sums tests, generalized linear mixed effects models and population branch statistics) were performed in R (version 4.0 and above). The specific details of the methods and sample sizes for target capture, variant filtering, quality control of individuals and variants, variant annotation, nucleotide diversity, statistical analyses for assessing relaxation of selective constraint and local adaptation, and PheWAS and haploblock analyses are described in the methods above.
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
All capture/sequencing and g.vcf data has been deposited in the European Genome-Phenome Archive (study id: EGAS00001007307). All other data, including LOF variants (Supplementary Data S1), target coordinates for MYbaits (Supplementary Data S2), PBS values for each pair of focal populations, and data for main figures are available at https://github.com/GokcumenLab/data. An expanded discussion of LOF variant distribution and evolutionary history for two haplotypes of particular interest, methodological figures (e.g., quality control filtering), and lists of significant PBS SNPs per geographic region, PheWAS results, and summaries of other functional annotations and their references are provided in the Supplementary Information.
We provide the R code and input files that we used for visualizations and statistical analysis at https://github.com/GokcumenLab/data.
Price, T. D. & Bar-Yosef, O. The origins of agriculture: new data, new ideas: an introduction to supplement 4. Curr. Anthropol. 52, S163–S174 (2011).
Smith, B. D. The emergence of agriculture (Scientific American Library, 1998).
Harper, K. N. & Armelagos, G. J. Genomics, the origins of agriculture, and our changing microbe-scape: time to revisit some old tales and tell some new ones. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 152, 135–152 (2013).
Larsen, C. S. Biological changes in human populations with agriculture. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 24, 185–213 (1995).
Larsen, C. S. The agricultural revolution as environmental catastrophe: Implications for health and lifestyle in the Holocene. Quat. Int. 150, 12–20 (2006).
Larsen, C. S. Animal source foods and human health during evolution. J. Nutr. 133, 3893S–3897S (2003).
Luca, F., Perry, G. H. & Rienzo, A. D. Evolutionary adaptations to dietary changes. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 30, 291–314 (2010).
Hancock, A. M. et al. Human adaptations to diet, subsistence, and ecoregion are due to subtle shifts in allele frequency. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 107, 8924–8930 (2010).
Mathieson, I. et al. Genome-wide patterns of selection in 230 ancient Eurasians. Nature 528, 499–503 (2015).
Perry, G. H. et al. Diet and the evolution of human amylase gene copy number variation. Nat. Genet. 39, 1256–1260 (2007).
Tishkoff, S. A. et al. Convergent adaptation of human lactase persistence in Africa and Europe. Nat. Genet. 39, 31–40 (2007).
Voight, B. F., Kudaravalli, S., Wen, X. & Pritchard, J. K. A map of recent positive selection in the human genome. PLOS Biol. 4, e72 (2006).
Saitou, M. et al. Sex-specific phenotypic effects and evolutionary history of an ancient polymorphic deletion of the human growth hormone receptor. Sci. Adv. 7, eabi4476 (2021).
Breslin, P. A. S. An evolutionary perspective on food and human taste. Curr. Biol. 23, R409–R418 (2013).
Campbell, M. C. et al. Origin and differential selection of allelic variation at TAS2R16 associated with salicin bitter taste sensitivity in Africa. Mol. Biol. Evol. 31, 288–302 (2014).
Hoover, K. C. et al. Global survey of variation in a human olfactory receptor gene reveals signatures of non-neutral evolution. Chem. Senses 40, 481–488 (2015).
Kulichová, I. et al. Demographic history was a formative mechanism of the genetic structure for the taste receptor TAS2R16 in human populations inhabiting Africa’s Sahel/Savannah Belt. Am. J. Biol. Anthropol. 177, 540–555 (2022).
Hayes, J. E., Feeney, E. L. & Allen, A. L. Do polymorphisms in chemosensory genes matter for human ingestive behavior? Food Qual. Prefer. 30, 202–216 (2013).
Jaeger, S. R. et al. A Mendelian trait for olfactory sensitivity affects odor experience and food selection. Curr. Biol. CB 23, 1601–1605 (2013).
Sandell, M. A. & Breslin, P. A. S. Variability in a taste-receptor gene determines whether we taste toxins in food. Curr. Biol. 16, R792–R794 (2006).
Hayakawa, T., Suzuki-Hashido, N., Matsui, A. & Go, Y. Frequent expansions of the bitter taste receptor gene repertoire during evolution of mammals in the Euarchontoglires clade. Mol. Biol. Evol. 31, 2018–2031 (2014).
Kistler, L. et al. Gourds and squashes (Cucurbita spp.) adapted to megafaunal extinction and ecological anachronism through domestication. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 112, 15107–15112 (2015).
Liu, G. et al. Differentiated adaptive evolution, episodic relaxation of selective constraints, and pseudogenization of umami and sweet taste genes TAS1Rs in catarrhine primates. Front. Zool. 11, 79 (2014).
Niimura, Y., Matsui, A. & Touhara, K. Extreme expansion of the olfactory receptor gene repertoire in African elephants and evolutionary dynamics of orthologous gene groups in 13 placental mammals. Genome Res. 24, 1485–1496 (2014).
Niimura, Y., Matsui, A. & Touhara, K. Acceleration of olfactory receptor gene loss in primate evolution: possible link to anatomical change in sensory systems and dietary transition. Mol. Biol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy042 (2018).
Murlis, J., Elkinton, J. S. & Cardé, R. T. Odor plumes and how insects use them. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 37, 505–532 (1992).
Müller-Schwarze, D. Chemical ecology of vertebrates (Cambridge University Press, 2006).
Lachance, J. et al. Evolutionary history and adaptation from high-coverage whole-genome sequences of diverse African hunter-gatherers. Cell 150, 457–469 (2012).
Menashe, I., Man, O., Lancet, D. & Gilad, Y. Population differences in haplotype structure within a human olfactory receptor gene cluster. Hum. Mol. Genet 11, 1381–1390 (2002).
Wnuk, E. & Majid, A. Revisiting the limits of language: the odor lexicon of Maniq. Cognition 131, 125–138 (2014).
Majid, A. & Kruspe, N. Hunter-gatherer olfaction is special. Curr. Biol. 28, 409–413.e2 (2018).
Majid, A. Human olfaction at the intersection of language, culture, and biology. Trends Cogn. Sci. 25, 111–123 (2021).
Hladik, C. M., Robbe, B. & Pagezy, H. Sensibilité gustative différentielle des populations Pygmées et non Pygmées de forêt dense, de Soudaniens et d’Eskimos, en rapport avec l’environnement biochimique. C. r. Acad. Sc. Paris Sér. III 303, 453–458 (1986).
Patin, E. & Quintana-Murci, L. Demeter’s legacy: rapid changes to our genome imposed by diet. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 56–59 (2008).
Campbell, M. C. et al. Evolution of functionally diverse alleles associated with PTC bitter taste sensitivity in Africa. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 1141–1153 (2012).
Gilad, Y. & Lancet, D. Population differences in the human functional olfactory repertoire. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20, 307–314 (2003).
Soranzo, N. et al. Positive selection on a high-sensitivity allele of the human bitter-taste receptor TAS2R16. Curr. Biol. 15, 1257–1265 (2005).
Rifkin, M. Beyond settler time: temporal sovereignty and Indigenous self-determination (Duke University Press, 2017).
Valente, C. et al. Genes from the TAS1R and TAS2R families of taste receptors: looking for signatures of their adaptive role in human evolution. Genome Biol. Evol. 10, 1139–1152 (2018).
Tajima, F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123, 585–595 (1989).
Yi, X. et al. Sequencing of 50 human exomes reveals adaptation to high altitude. Science 329, 75–78 (2010).
Nolden, A. A., McGeary, J. E. & Hayes, J. E. Differential bitterness in capsaicin, piperine, and ethanol associates with polymorphisms in multiple bitter taste receptor genes. Physiol. Behav. 156, 117–127 (2016).
Lohmueller, K. E. The distribution of deleterious genetic variation in human populations. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 29, 139–146 (2014).
Henn, B. M. et al. Distance from sub-Saharan Africa predicts mutational load in diverse human genomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 113, E440–E449 (2016).
Houston, S. H. 12. The Whorfian hypothesis. In A Survey of Psycholinguistics 184–194 (De Gruyter Mouton, 2019).
Regier, T. & Kay, P. Language, thought, and color: Whorf was half right. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13, 439–446 (2009).
Arshamian, A. et al. The perception of odor pleasantness is shared across cultures. Curr. Biol. 32, 2061–2066.e3 (2022).
Olender, T. et al. Personal receptor repertoires: olfaction as a model. BMC Genomics 13, 414 (2012).
Hasin-Brumshtein, Y., Lancet, D. & Olender, T. Human olfaction: from genomic variation to phenotypic diversity. Trends Genet. 25, 178–184 (2009).
Menashe, I., Man, O., Lancet, D. & Gilad, Y. Different noses for different people. Nat. Genet. 34, 143–144 (2003).
Trimmer, C. et al. Genetic variation across the human olfactory receptor repertoire alters odor perception. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 116, 9475–9480 (2019).
Khtar, M. et al. Genetic variation of olfactory receptor gene family in a Japanese population. Anthropol. Sci. 130, 93–106 (2022).
Toda, Y. et al. Evolution of the primate glutamate taste sensor from a nucleotide sensor. Curr. Biol. 31, 4641–4649.e5 (2021).
Gisladottir, R. S. et al. Sequence variants in TAAR5 and other loci affect human odor perception and naming. Curr. Biol. 30, 4643–4653.e3 (2020).
Perry, G. H. & Dominy, N. J. Evolution of the human pygmy phenotype. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 218–225 (2009).
Perry, G. H. et al. Adaptive, convergent origins of the pygmy phenotype in African rainforest hunter-gatherers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 111, E3596–E3603 (2014).
Bergey, C. M. et al. Polygenic adaptation and convergent evolution on growth and cardiac genetic pathways in African and Asian rainforest hunter-gatherers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 115, E11256–E11263 (2018).
Connor, E. E., Zhou, Y. & Liu, G. E. The essence of appetite: does olfactory receptor variation play a role? J. Anim. Sci. 96, 1551–1558 (2018).
Pickrell, J. K. et al. Signals of recent positive selection in a worldwide sample of human populations. Genome Res 19, 826–837 (2009).
López Herráez, D. et al. Genetic variation and recent positive selection in worldwide human populations: evidence from nearly 1 million SNPs. PLOS One 4, e7888 (2009).
Sjöstrand, A. E. et al. Taste perception and lifestyle: insights from phenotype and genome data among Africans and Asians. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 29, 325–337 (2021).
Amone, C. We are strong because of our millet bread: Staple foods and the growth of ethnic identities in Uganda (TRAMES, 2014). XVIII.
Friedenberg, S. G., Meurs, K. M. & Mackay, T. F. C. Evaluation of artificial selection in Standard Poodles using whole-genome sequencing. Mamm. Genome 27, 599–609 (2016).
Arendt, M., Cairns, K. M., Ballard, J. W. O., Savolainen, P. & Axelsson, E. Diet adaptation in dog reflects spread of prehistoric agriculture. Heredity 117, 301–306 (2016).
Liu, Y.-H. et al. Whole-genome sequencing reveals lactase persistence adaptation in European dogs. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 4884–4890 (2021).
Wang, G. et al. The genomics of selection in dogs and the parallel evolution between dogs and humans. Nat. Commun. 4, 1860 (2013).
Pause, B. M. Processing of body odor signals by the human brain. Chemosens. Percept. 5, 55–63 (2012).
Foster, S. R., Roura, E. & Thomas, W. G. Extrasensory perception: odorant and taste receptors beyond the nose and mouth. Pharmacol. Ther. 142, 41–61 (2014).
Bergström, A., Stringer, C., Hajdinjak, M., Scerri, E. M. L. & Skoglund, P. Origins of modern human ancestry. Nature 590, 229–237 (2021).
Martin, A. R. et al. An unexpectedly complex architecture for skin pigmentation in Africans. Cell 171, 1340–1353.e14 (2017).
Crawford, N. G. et al. Loci associated with skin pigmentation identified in African populations. Science 358, eaan8433 (2017).
Olender, T., Nativ, N. & Lancet, D. HORDE: comprehensive resource for olfactory receptor genomics. Methods Mol. Biol. Clifton NJ 1003, 23–38 (2013).
Arbiza, L., Zhong, E. & Keinan, A. NRE: a tool for exploring neutral loci in the human genome. BMC Bioinforma. 13, 301 (2012).
Poplin, R. et al. Scaling accurate genetic variant discovery to tens of thousands of samples. bioRxiv 201178, https://doi.org/10.1101/201178 (2018).
Danecek, P. et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27, 2156–2158 (2011).
Waszak, S. M. et al. Systematic inference of copy-number genotypes from personal genome sequencing data reveals extensive olfactory receptor gene content diversity. PLOS Comput. Biol. 6, e1000988 (2010).
Hasin, Y. et al. High-resolution copy-number variation map reflects human olfactory receptor diversity and evolution. PLOS Genet 4, e1000249 (2008).
Young, J. M. et al. Extensive copy-number variation of the human olfactory receptor gene family. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 83, 228–242 (2008).
Roudnitzky, N. et al. Copy number variation in TAS2R bitter taste receptor genes: structure, origin, and population genetics. Chem. Senses 41, 649–659 (2016).
Ebbert, M. T. W. et al. Systematic analysis of dark and camouflaged genes reveals disease-relevant genes hiding in plain sight. Genome Biol. 20, 97 (2019).
Danecek, P. et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. GigaScience 10, 1–4 (2021).
McLaren, W. et al. The Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor. Genome Biol. 17, 122 (2016).
Hasin-Brumshtein, Y. Genetic variation in human olfactory receptors: from evolution to olfactory sensitivity (Weizmann Institute of Science, 2010).
Hughes, G. M., Teeling, E. C. & Higgins, D. G. Loss of olfactory receptor function in hominin evolution. PloS One 9, e84714 (2014).
Kent, W. J. et al. The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res. 12, 996–1006 (2002).
Purcell, S. et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 559–575 (2007).
Schweizer, R. M. et al. Targeted capture and resequencing of 1040 genes reveal environmentally driven functional variation in grey wolves. Mol. Ecol. 25, 357–379 (2016).
Fischer, A., Gilad, Y., Man, O. & Pääbo, S. Evolution of bitter taste receptors in humans and apes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22, 432–436 (2005).
Go, Y., Satta, Y., Takenaka, O. & Takahata, N. Lineage-specific loss of function of bitter taste receptor genes in humans and nonhuman primates. Genetics 170, 313–326 (2005).
Balasubramanian, S. et al. Using ALoFT to determine the impact of putative loss-of-function variants in protein-coding genes. Nat. Commun. 8, 382 (2017).
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48 (2015).
Lachance, J. & Tishkoff, S. A. Population genomics of human adaptation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 44, 123–143 (2013).
Weir, B. S. & Cockerham, C. C. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38, 1358–1370 (1984).
Watanabe, K. et al. A global overview of pleiotropy and genetic architecture in complex traits. Nat. Genet. 51, 1339–1348 (2019).
South, A. rworldmap: a new R package for mapping global data. R. J. 3, 34–43 (2011).
The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature 526, 68–74 (2015).
Prüfer, K. et al. The complete genome sequence of a Neanderthal from the Altai Mountains. Nature 505, 43–49 (2014).
Meyer, M. et al. A high-coverage genome sequence from an archaic Denisovan individual. Science 338, 222–226 (2012).
Browning, B. L., Zhou, Y. & Browning, S. R. A one-penny imputed genome from next-generation reference panels. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 103, 338–348 (2018).
Xu, D., Jaber, Y., Pavlidis, P. & Gokcumen, O. VCFtoTree: a user-friendly tool to construct locus-specific alignments and phylogenies from thousands of anthropologically relevant genome sequences. BMC Bioinforma. 18, 426 (2017).
Leigh, J. W. & Bryant, D. popart: full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods Ecol. Evol. 6, 1110–1116 (2015).
Albers, P. K. & McVean, G. Dating genomic variants and shared ancestry in population-scale sequencing data. PLOS Biol. 18, e3000586 (2020).
Funding for this study was provided by the Wenner-Gren Foundation to E.C.G. and A.D.M., the American Association of University Women Postdoctoral Research Leave Fellowship to C.C.V., the David and Lucile Packard Foundation (2007-31754) to N.J.D., the National Institutes of Health (R01-GM115656) to G.H.P., the National Science Foundation (2049947) to O.G., the National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2017-03782) and Canada Research Chairs Program (950-231257) to A.D.M. The authors gratefully acknowledge Paul Gordon, Gwen Duytschaever, Joseph Orkin, Mrinalini Watsa, Shasta Webb, Mareike Janiak, Heritiana Randrianatoandro, and Richard Bankoff for their contributions to data generation and analyses. We are extremely grateful to the Indigenous communities that participated in our study, and the elders empowered to represent each settlement (barangay) in the Philippines, namely Peter Donato, Jimmy Donato, Leo Salazar, Alfredo Surigao, Danilo Calinawan, Eluterio C. Capua, and Elena Megsaganay. For assistance in the consent process, sampling, validation and subsequent dissemination of results, we thank: • National Commission on Indigenous Peoples: Raul Ampo, Barbara Garcia, Randy Gener Cabaldo, Villarica Lumancas, Elpedio Montenegro, Wilfredo Rodulfo, and Juvy Tabor. • Educational Institutions: Charles Ibingira, Makerere University, and Chancellor Sergio S. Cao and Vice-Chancellor Lorna Paredes, University of the Philippines Diliman. • Local Governments: Roxanne C. Pimentel, Mayor of Tandag, Philippines, and Jasmin F Monton, Mayor of Jabonga, Philippines. • Batwa Development Program: Busingye Levi, Richard Magezi, Joseph Safari and Stephen Gonsalves. • Practical support: Leah Nawegulo, Gerry Salazar, Jimmy Salazar, and Sam Salazar.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information
Communications Biology thanks Asifa Majid and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Melanie Bahlo, Luke R. Grinham and George Inglis.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Veilleux, C.C., Garrett, E.C., Pajic, P. et al. Human subsistence and signatures of selection on chemosensory genes. Commun Biol 6, 683 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-023-05047-y