Abstract
Ischemic cerebrovascular events often lead to aphasia. Previous work provided hints that such strokes may affect women and men in distinct ways. Women tend to suffer strokes with more disabling language impairment, even if the lesion size is comparable to men. In 1401 patients, we isolate data-led representations of anatomical lesion patterns and hand-tailor a Bayesian analytical solution to carefully model the degree of sex divergence in predicting language outcomes ~3 months after stroke. We locate lesion-outcome effects in the left-dominant language network that highlight the ventral pathway as a core lesion focus across different tests of language performance. We provide detailed evidence for sex-specific brain-behavior associations in the domain-general networks associated with cortico-subcortical pathways, with unique contributions of the fornix in women and cingular fiber bundles in men. Our collective findings suggest diverging white matter substrates in how stroke causes language deficits in women and men. Clinically acknowledging such sex disparities has the potential to improve personalized treatment for stroke patients worldwide.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Stroke is the leading cause of long-term disability worldwide1,2. By 2047, the prevalence of stroke is estimated to increase by 27%, with a disproportionate increase of stroke events in women relative to men3,4,5. Estimations suggest a ~55,000 increase of absolute stroke events in women compared to men each year (women: 425,325 cases, men: 369,675 cases)3,4,5. The anticipated rise in stroke prevalence will put a strain on the economic burden of our health systems. The annual stroke-related social and health costs have reached >60€ billion in Europe alone6,7. Post-stroke aphasia places an overwhelming burden on many of the >25 million stroke survivors worldwide8,9. For affected individuals, the sequelae of stroke can prompt drastic life changes, with severe long-term impairments10,11. Aphasia severely impacts everyday communication and social interactions by affecting language production and comprehension. Aphasia is associated with an increased mortality rate12, longer hospitalization, poorer functional recovery, and reduced overall probability of returning to work13.
As an underappreciated fact, women typically suffer strokes with more severe consequences and language impairment even if the lesion size is comparable to men14,15. Yet, the majority of stroke lesion studies have been underpowered to detect robust sex disparities given the surfeit of small-sample investigations16,17. A recent meta-analysis argued that sex-nuanced differences in aphasia outcome might be partly explained by the typically older age of stroke onset in women compared to men18. For that reason, placing special emphasis on sex effects requires well-powered patient samples while carefully controlling for influencing factors, especially given that many sex-related neural correlates are modest in effect size19. The present investigation in a large patient cohort aims at a direct probabilistic assessment of the subtle sex effects in how the topography of white matter tissue damage leads to differences in language impairments. Such insights on sex-specific lesion–outcome associations are needed to improve personalized treatment prospects in light of the increased burden of aphasia in women.
Aphasia is a frequent consequence of embolic occlusion of the middle cerebral artery. However, brain lesion distributions are highly variable in the preserved and impaired language capacity20,21,22. In attempting to harmonize the heterogeneous clinical manifestation of aphasia, decades of research efforts have been devoted to determining the complex neural basis of language processing. Today, there is growing consensus that the human language faculty is supported by distributed large-scale networks (for meta-analyses, see refs. 23,24,25; for functional evidence, see refs. 26,27,28; for lesion studies, see ref. 29). Numerous studies have shed light on the anatomical white matter connections at play. In particular, the arcuate fasciculus (AF) has been at the center of attention for decades30,31. Early anatomical dissection outlined its anatomical trajectory, which suggested a direct fiber connection of Wernicke’s area in the left temporal lobe to Broca’s area in the left frontal lobe32,33. Applications of diffusion tensor imaging techniques promoted the idea of a further division of the AF into three segments. One direct temporo-frontal segment and two lateral segments have been proposed to compose the overall AF. The lateral tract subsegments implement an indirect fronto-parietal and temporal-parietal pathway (anterior and posterior segment, respectively)34,35. The AF may provide an anchor for the canonical perisylvian network and has been placed at the core of the neuroarchitecture of the uniquely human language abilities36.
Attempting to marry its structural and functional bases, researchers have integrated the core perisylvian pathway into different functional-anatomical modules. One popular idea is the dual-stream concept of language37,38,39,40,41,42. This view puts forward a ventral stream for mapping sound-to-meaning and a dorsal stream comprising the AF and superior longitudinal fascicle for mapping sound-to-motor representations. The ventral pathway includes the uncinate fasciculus (UF), the inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (IFOF), and inferior longitudinal fasciculus (ILF) that together assist in processing speech signals for language comprehension31,41,43,44. The dorsal stream is thought to be left-dominant, while the ventral stream is believed to be more bilaterally organized31,38,45. However, there is strong interindividual variability in the degree of functional hemispheric dominance in general46,47,48, and accumulating evidence points towards aspects of sex-specific differentiation in particular. For example, more pronounced left lateralization in the long segment of the AF was found in men49. Sex differences have also been reported for lateralization of functional activation during carefully designed language tasks50,51,52,53.
Clinically, ischemic stroke generally affects male and female patients differently in terms of incidence, severity, survival, and potential for recovery4,54,55. In fact, women generally suffer strokes with more severe neuropsychological consequences compared to those of men14,56. Similar lesion volume effects were noted in cases of aphasia, in which smaller ischemic stroke lesions were capable of producing aphasia in women than men15. The reasons behind sex idiosyncrasies in functional outcomes after stroke remain elusive. Differences are often explained by poorer pre-stroke function, more comorbidities such as depression, and social isolation or differences in age at stroke onset (see refs. 18,57). Yet, adjustment for these factors does not adequately explain the observed discrepancies in stroke outcomes between men and women58,59.
Despite the apparent differences in stroke outcome between women and men, sex is often treated as a nuisance variable in the overwhelming majority of stroke lesion studies20,60,61. This established practice blinds researchers to detect any potential neuroanatomical effects that depend on sex. Compounding these challenges that hold barriers to understanding sex-specific brain lesion effects, lesion-symptom mapping studies often constrained the analyses to the predominantly affected hemisphere. That is, as a general trend, the left hemisphere is specifically investigated in language impairment and the right hemisphere in neglect20,60,62,63,64. To overcome several existing roadblocks, the present work takes advantage of Bayesian principles as a formal device to quantify degrees of sex divergences. In contrast to frequentist post hoc estimations, the Bayesian regime provides a direct quantification of uncertainty around all model parameters by appropriately handling all considered sources of variation, and thus enable more careful quantification of subtle sex effects, covariates, such as age, and meta-brain lesion characteristics, such as lateralization65,66,67. As a key advantage of this fully probabilistic modeling approach, the inferential capacity can thus be enhanced by accommodating dependencies between parameters at each hierarchical level. Well suited for samples with >1000 patients65,68, our Bayesian hierarchical strategy enabled a sex-aware analysis quantifying the certainty of subtle differences between female and male stroke patients, covering major white matter pathways in both hemispheres. As the accurate quantification of model uncertainty is critical for optimized decision making in medicine69, understanding how lesion location, structural language lateralization, and their clinical outcome diverge in aphasia between female and male populations can finesse personalized rehabilitation and treatment.
Results
Patient cohort: characteristics and behavioral outcome measures
Our inclusion criteria were met by 1401 patients with ischemic stroke who were recruited as a prospective multi-center cohort from 2007 to 2018 (Table 1 for details). The mean age was 67.58 (standard deviation 11.59), with 42% women. The mean age at admission was significantly higher in females than males (t = 8.9, p < 0.001, cf. Table 1). Patients had an average of 9.28 (5.92) years of education, with women amounting to fewer years on average compared to those of men (t = −17.27, p < 0.001). Based on the IQCODE score, females’ cognitive performance before the ischemic event was significantly worse compared to males (t = 3.91, p < 0.001). Stroke severity as reflected in the clinical impairment was significantly higher in females across nine cognitive tests (K-MMSE, BN, SF, PF, RCFT, RCFT delayed recall, digital symbol coding, TMT-A, and -B). Out of 15 objects to be recognized in the BN70, patients correctly named 9.92 (3.59) on average, with females scoring worse than males (t = −11.90, p < 0.001). Females also performed worse in semantic and phonemic fluency (t = −7.12 and −7.97, both p < 0.001). In sum, we observed more severe stroke-related deficits and worse premorbid cognitive performances in female patients of our cohort.
Topography of ischemic stroke lesion patterns
Excellent whole-brain coverage was attested by the voxel-wise summary of lesion overlap across 1401 patients (Fig. 1a). The lesion overlap predominantly corresponded to the vascular territory of the left and right middle cerebral artery. The majority of lesions were located in the deep central white matter in both hemispheres. Most tissue lesions were concentrated in the thalamus and basal ganglia. The average lesion volume was 17.08 ml (14.81–19.36) and did not significantly differ between female and male patients within our cohort (women: 15.05 ml (11.47–18.63), men: 18.57 ml (15.63–21.51), p = 0.13; Table 1). We did not find significant differences between females and males regarding their stroke topography (Fig. 1b, c, summarized separately).
Anatomy of the extracted stroke lesion atoms
We first extracted hidden topographical archetypes from the high-dimensional lesion distribution in white matter at voxel resolution. Using non-negative matrix factorization (NNMF; ref. 71) for unsupervised pattern discovery, we automatically uncovered recurring spatial configurations of concurrent tissue damage that are consistently apparent across >1000 stroke cases—which we call lesion atoms (Fig. 2)56,72. Each lesion atom (component issued by NNMF application) reflects a prototypical latent pattern of stroke-inflicted white matter disconnection (for an analytical overview, see Supplementary Fig. 3). Disentanglement of this sum-of-parts representation by means of machine learning provides an important advantage for the purpose of the present study. The non-negativity constraint of the applied algorithm enabled neurobiological meaningfully and directly interpretable lesion patterns71,73,74. For each lesion atom, the underlying tract configuration is strictly positive (ranging from low to high contributions, cf. legend in Fig. 2a). The original MRI-lesion distribution is then reconstructed by the simple addition of these latent lesion atom patterns and hence is compatible with the intuitive notion of combining different parts to form a whole. In contrast, alternative dimensionality reduction tools such as principal component analysis recover a complex superposition of orthogonal components with arbitrary signs that lack intuitive meaning and direct biological interpretation74,75,76. In the present study, for example, such negative weights may contradict the physicality of stroke-induced tissue lesions as a negative amount of tract lesion damage inflicted by stroke cannot be meaningfully interpreted. Leveraging the above advantages of the NNMF approach, therefore, allows intuitive and neurobiologically meaningful interpretation of latent stroke patterns (e.g., the importance of latent patterns in the posterior cerebral artery territory in Bonkhoff et al.56,72). As a descriptive post hoc analysis, each lesion atom was assessed for hemispheric dominance of the implicated tissue lesion distribution by an index of lateralization (Fig. 2b). For most factors, there was a unique left-hemispheric lesion constellation in correspondence with a similar right-hemispheric homolog (Fig. 2c, factors 3 and 9, or 2 and 5). Overall, the spatial distribution of the derived lesion atoms emerged to be directly interpretable and biologically plausible with components underlying distinct territories of arterial supply (Fig. 2). Most of the identified lesion atoms related to infarcts in the left or right middle cerebral artery territories, and to a lesser extent to posterior cerebral artery strokes, and mixtures of both.
Four lesion atoms of stroke-induced tissue damage were associated with anatomical tracts implicated in the dorsal and ventral language pathways (Fig. 2c). The canonical language tracts contributed the most to these identified lesion atoms, and hence, influenced our choice of post hoc naming. However, other tracts, e.g., motor projections within the affected arterial territory were part of the lesion atom to a lesser degree as well. Generally, the left-lateralized language atoms showed stronger lesion effects than their right-lateralized homologs. Factor 9 primarily covered white matter lesions of the core perisylvian pathway with a focus on the left hemisphere. These lesion effects predominantly rested on the AF. The level of relevance within the subsegments of the AF followed an anterior-to-posterior gradient. Here, the anterior and long segments showed higher lesion importance than the posterior segment. The core perisylvian right-hemispheric homolog was captured by factor 3. The organization of the AF’s different segments again showed an anterior-to-posterior transition. Both factors implicated the UF pathway to a lesser extent. Factor 5 resembled the left-lateralized ventral pathways, which included the ILF, the IFOF, and the UF. These lesion atom effects further implicated damage in the left optic radiation (OR), and to a lesser degree, the posterior segment of the AF. The right-hemispheric homolog to factor 5 was identified as factor 2. Right-hemispheric (Factor 2) ventral pathways were less pronounced regarding their overall lesion importance compared to the left.
Three lesion atoms resembled damage to the brain’s motor circuits (Fig. 2c bottom row). The pattern topology of lesion factor 1 included the left-lateralized motor projections of the cortico-spinal tract (CST), internal capsule (IC), and cortico-pontine-cerebellar tract (CPC). Similarly, factor 7 captured lesions in the mirrored motor projections of the right hemisphere. Factor 10 was the only factor with no hemispheric dominance and captured bilateral cerebellar connections, including the CPC, the inferior and superior cerebellar peduncle (ICP, SCP). Three further lesion atoms captured the prominent influence of the limbic system. The right cingular fibers dominated the tissue damage configuration of factor 4, next to a lesser influence of the posterior segment of the AF, IFOF, and IC. Conversely, the lesion constellation of factor 6 captured the left-hemispheric cingular influence. Lastly, factor 8 was dominantly shaped by the influence of the left fornix, less so by its right counterpart. Notably, only factor 8 did not have a clear homologous pattern on the right hemisphere. However, the right fornix appeared weakly in other lesion atoms, i.e., factors 2, 7, and 8.
Lesion atoms track interindividual differences in cognitive outcomes
To chart the clinical relevance of each lesion atom, we computed Pearson’s correlations between patient-specific expressions of a given lesion atom and a cognitive test, one for each available neuropsychological assessment (Fig. 3). The patient-specific lesion atom expressions illustrate how well the overall stroke lesion in a given patient can be recovered with the archetypal “template” captured by each lesion atom. Based on the ensuing (absolute) factor-outcome association strengths (Fig. 3a), we could rank the lesion atoms across all outcome measures of our cohort with detailed neuropsychological assessment. As a consequence of this bottom-up approach, factors 5 (Ventral pathway R), 8 (Fornix L), and 9 (Dorsal pathway L) ranked as the three most clinically relevant lesion atoms given our functional domains of cognitive outcomes. The limbic factors 4 and 6 reflected the right and left influence of the cingular fiber bundle and ranked fourth and fifth. Except for the TMT, factors 5, 8, and 9 showed pronounced negative associations across most cognitive scores (Fig. 3b). Regarding the language outcomes, damage in the left-hemispheric lesion atoms of the ventral and dorsal pathways (Factors 5 and 9, respectively) was most associated with a deterioration in Boston naming (BN), semantic fluency (SF), and phonemic fluency (PF). However, the association with their respective right-hemispheric homologs diverged: Notably, the right hemispheric homolog of the core perisylvian network (Factor 3) showed a slightly negative association with BN, but otherwise positive associations for SF and PF. In contrast, the right-hemispheric homolog of the ventral pathway (Factor 2) was negatively associated with BN and SF, with close links to deteriorated naming and speech fluency.
Sex divergences in lesion atom expressions and prediction of language outcome
Next, we turned to the direct quantification of degrees of sex differentiation in how the emerged lesion patterns predict language outcome. Based on the patient-specific constellations of lesion pattern expressions, we estimated a fully probabilistic, generative model to explain language outcome at ~3 months after stroke. In particular, our approach was able to obtain full Bayesian posteriors over the differentiation between females and males. In the present analysis, we focused on the quantitative analyses of the language outcomes of naming ability (BN) and speech fluency (SF and PF; other scores cf. Supplementary Figs. 4–15). Leveraging the Bayesian modeling framework, we provided an honest quantification of (a) the general effects of the derived lesion atoms on cognitive outcome after stroke and (b) the degree of sex divergence in how the lesion atoms achieve the prediction of post-stroke language outcome. All analyses were adjusted for variation that could be explained by age, age2, sex, education in years, pre-morbid cognitive performance, and total lesion volume. We also included sex as a covariate in the model to explicitly account for a priori differences between female and male stroke outcomes56. For example, worse language outcomes in females could be linked to an underlying cause independent of the lesion distribution, such as a decreased likelihood of receiving acute interventions. In this scenario, the effect would be expressed in the Bayesian posterior distribution of the sex covariate, but not in that of the female-stratified lesion atom.
Among our target language capacities, we first examined interindividual differences in naming ability as captured by the BN test. The posterior predictive checks confirmed an appropriately fitted approximation of the data variation that underlies how lesion atom expressions explain cognitive performance outcomes (R2 = 0.51, Fig. 4a). We then inspected the role of each lesion atom in forecasting future naming performance in BN at ~3 months after stroke, separately for women and men (Fig. 5a). Both sexes displayed worse naming outcomes (BN) with increasing damage to the left-lateralized ventral pathway (most prominent in factor 5), its right-hemispheric homolog (captured primarily by factor 2), and the right cingular fiber pathway (major role in factor 4). However, the inferred posterior parameter distributions also attested specific divergences between females and males regarding lesion-outcome associations: the right-hemispheric homolog of the core perisylvian network (Factor 3) and the left fornix (part of factor 8). Here, damage in the lesion pattern configurations apparent in men was predictive of worse language outcomes. In contrast, stronger impairment in females was further explained by damage in the left core perisylvian network (driving constellation of factor 9). Tissue damage in the motor projections of the right hemisphere (in factor 7) and the left cingular fiber pathway (most prominent tract of factor 6) explained more pronounced deficits in naming performance in women than men. We thus identified common and diverging effects across the subject expressions of lesion atoms to predict naming capacity between women and men.
Out of all extracted lesion atoms, distinct factors carried explanatory weight jointly for both sexes or uniquely for the female and male patients in our stroke population. The explanatory relevance for BN was indicated by the inferred marginal posterior parameter distributions (Fig. 6a). Most relevant across both sexes, we identified a driving effect in the left-lateralized ventral pathway (Factor 5). Stroke-induced consequences were stronger in women (mean of the posterior distribution [PM] = −0.251, highest density interval [HDI] of the posterior distribution covering 80% certainty = −0.410 to −0.090) than in men (PM = −0.158, HDI −0.267 to −0.040). We found further sex-diverging lesion-outcome effects. In women, tissue damage in the left fornix (major role in factor 8) predicted a more preserved outcome (Factor 8; PM = 0.138, HDI 0.008 to 0.248). Of note, a positive PM still reflects an inflicted decrease in function. However, compared to the average of the behavioral performance distribution of the full patient cohort the behavioral injury is overall less pronounced than in other stroke patients. In males, we identified small but consistent effects: the right homolog of the ventral pathway contributed to the prediction of lost function (Factor 2; PM = −0.032, HDI −0.063 to −0.009). Further, damage to the bilateral cerebellar network (Factor 10; PM = −0.080, HDI −0.119 to −0.037) contributed to explaining naming impairments. Together, our BN findings witness a dominant lesion-outcome effect in the left ventral language pathway, consistently for both women and men. For women, the left fornix lesion was indicative of more moderate impairment of cognitive capacity ~3 months after stroke. In contrast, males only showed modest diverging lesion pattern effects located in the homologous right ventral pathway and bilateral cerebellar connections.
Examining how SF outcome differences are underpinned by white matter tissue damage, the posterior predictive check indicated an explained variance of R2 = 0.37 (Fig. 4b). Considering the male versus female lesion-outcome associations, we identified strong effects for both sexes in the left ventral pathway (Factor 5; Fig. 5b), followed by the left cingular fibers (most prominent part in Factor 6) and the right homolog of the ventral pathway (included in factor 2). Damage captured by each of these three lesion atoms played contributing roles in lost SF function. Lesions affecting the right dorsal perisylvian circuit (most prominent in factor 3) explained a more moderate deficit for both sexes. Yet, in the SF function, too, we detected pronounced sex divergences. Men deteriorated more in SF tests as a result of tissue damage in the right cingular fibers (defining role in factor 4). In contrast, white matter damage in the left core perisylvian network (primarily in factor 9) added to difficulties with language fluency in women.
The lesion patterns predictive of SF differences resembled those explaining BN differences as evidenced by the corresponding marginal posterior distributions: our model attributed SF dysfunction in part to tissue damage in the left ventral pathway (most prominent in factor 5, Fig. 6b) in both sexes. This lesion-outcome association was more pronounced in women (PM = −0.360, HDI −0.561 to −0.186) than men (PM = −0.190, HDI −0.345 to −0.069). Patient expressions of the lesion atom in the right-hemispheric perisylvian network were informative for predicting decreased, yet in relation to the entire stroke patient cohort more preserved function in women (PM = 0.157, HDI 0.034 to 0.276) but not in men (Fig. 6b). Similar to the BN analysis, the right ventral pathway (Factor 2, PM = −0.040, HDI −0.069 to −0.010) helped predict loss in SF function in males (Fig. 6b). The left-hemispheric motor projections damage (Factor 1, PM = −0.045, HDI −0.088 to −0.012) helped predict SF dysfunction. However, we observed an even stronger lesion-outcome contribution by the right cingular fibers (defining in factor 4, PM = −0.268, HDI −0.400 to −0.121) in men. Concluding our SF findings, we found a common lesion-outcome effect in the left ventral pathway. In women, tissue damage compromising the right perisylvian pathway added to the predictability of SF performance outcomes in our patients. Damage caused to the right cingulum assisted in the prediction of future SF loss in men beyond the damage caused to the left ventral pathway.
As the last examined facet of language capacity, we quantified how patterns of tissue damage underpin interindividual differences in PF performance ~3 months after stroke. The full probabilistic model explained R2 = 0.37 of the variance in the outcome predictions based on the patient expressions of dedicated lesion atoms (Fig. 4b). Common to both sexes, our model attributed lesion damage in the left core perisylvian circuit (prominently captured in factor 9) to loss of PF function. We found marked divergences between sexes in factors 3–6 (Fig. 5). Specifically, language dysfunction in females was due, to a larger extent, to damage to the left ventral pathway (most profound in factor 5). In contrast, men showed more pronounced consequences for cognitive performance due to damage to the right and left cingulum (highest contributions in factor 5 and 6) and the right perisylvian pathway (captured mostly in factor 3).
Based on the inferred Bayesian posteriors (Fig. 6c), the left dorsal perisylvian pathway showed considerable relevance in explaining differences in PF function, which was comparable in both sexes (Factor 9, females: PM = −0.151, HDI −0.298 to −0.020; males: PM = −0.146, HDI −0.273 to −0.029). However, women’s functional loss in PF was more explained by damage in the left ventral pathway (Factor 5, PM = −0.235, HDI −0.437 to −0.043) compared to men. Additionally, lesions in the bilateral cerebellar network (Factor 10; PM = −0.058, HDI −0.114 to −0.008) tracked performance decline in PF. Further, men showed a strong negative effect in the right cingular pathway (most prominent in factor 4, PM = −0.217, HDI −0.359 to −0.077). Together, our lesion-outcome effects in PF highlighted the influence of the left-dominant perisylvian network common to both sexes. In women, the left ventral pathway added predictive value as to a loss of function in SF. In men, however, the influence of the right cingulum was further indicative of deterioration in PF.
Our sex-sensitive approach enabled us to tease apart shared and diverging lesion-outcome effects in female and male stroke populations. Across both sexes, the ventral pathway was critically involved in naming and semantic fluency deficits, while the dorsal pathway was implicated in phonemic fluency deficits. More generally, we provide evidence for sex-nuanced lesion-outcome effects. Concluding our findings across all language performance scores, women tend to rely on left-dominant circuits, including structural connections of the fornix. We further detailed a female-specific vulnerability to ventral lesion damage in phonemic fluency. In contrast, this facet of language performance in men tended to draw from bilateral ventral and cerebellar connections. Damage caused to the right cingular fiber connections assisted in the prediction of future SF loss in men beyond the damage caused to language-specific pathways.
Discussion
Language capacity is uniquely evolved in humans and a central aspect of daily life in our societies. There is now an increasing realization that brain tissue damage caused by stroke entails partly distinct consequences on language performance in women and men. We hence designed a fully probabilistic framework as a clean analytical solution to modeling the apparent degrees of sex disparity. First, we extracted neurobiologically meaningful lesion patterns from 1401 stroke patients in a data-led fashion. Second, we custom-tailored a bespoke Bayesian strategy to partition interindividual variation in caused aphasia outcomes into their lesion pattern contributions. In so doing, we offer honest uncertainty quantification of sex-biased effects in clinical language outcomes after stroke in one of the largest stroke cohorts with rarely available deep phenotyping.
In particular, (1) we identified lesion-outcome effects in men and women in the left-dominant language network39,41, highlighting ventral fiber tracts of the left ILF, the IFOF, and the UF as core lesion focus across loss of different language facets. (2) Across both sexes, our analyses of brain lesion topographies pointed to an overarching structural organization reflecting the dual-stream concept of language and revealed pronounced sex divergencies in the role of lesion patterns. (3) We provide evidence for sex-nuanced lesion-outcome effects in the domain-general supra-modal networks, which our model attributed to cortico-subcortical pathways, with strong implications of the fornix and cingular fiber bundles. In the following, we discuss our findings for the anatomical topology of the identified lesion atoms, the shared lesion-outcome effects across sexes, and diverging predictive effects between men and women in implicated domain-general supra-modal networks.
Our analytical approach offered several advantages over classical lesion-symptom mapping studies. In conventional lesion-symptom mapping, each brain voxel is usually considered in isolation62. However, analyzing the contribution of each single brain voxel individually deters intuitive interpretation by omitting interaction effects between spatially distant locations. Multivariate extensions have started to address the problem of mutual dependence between voxels63,77,78. However, these approaches remain ill-suited to detecting overarching sources of variation that are driving disparate brain effects in continuous degrees, such as brain lateralization or sex-specific lesion-behavior associations. By means of our purpose-designed generative model, we could simultaneously appreciate local tract-lesion effects (and inter-dependencies between them) and their spatially distributed configurations. Leveraging the hierarchy of our fully probabilistic approach, we can directly integrate their hemispheric and sex-specific idiosyncrasies into one unified model for clinical outcome prediction.
The estimation of our framework was supported by empirical lesion data from a large sample of 1,401 stroke patients with rarely available whole-brain coverage. In line with the existing literature, the lesions were predominantly localized in subcortical zones and led to a critical disconnection of deep white matter tracts22. Rather than providing clear-cut one-to-one mappings in all cases, the identified tract damage underlies regions vascularized by the middle and posterior cerebral artery and was previously linked to worse language deficits21,22. Our data source thus presented two thrusts forward in stroke neuroimaging modeling. First, the spatial topography of the discovered lesion constellations covered both hemispheres. In many previous stroke studies on aphasia or spatial neglect, researchers have limited the anatomical space of investigation to either the left or right hemisphere alone60,61,62,63,79,80. This unique data scenario enabled us to detect delicate predictive effects, including subtle sex differences, with regard to both brain hemispheres. Second, our findings provide comparable lesion coverage for both sexes. In contrast to the large majority of stroke lesion studies20,60,61, we explicitly model sex as a higher model effect of interest. Potential differences independent of the sex-specific brain damage-behavior relation are further accommodated by our covariates at the lower level of our Bayesian model. This strategy ensures unique lesion-symptom effects for women and men and potentially helps to explain previous seemingly contradictory findings81.
Our pattern discovery framework enabled us to identify topologically coherent and biologically meaningful spatial patterns of lesion distributions from stroke. The identified lesion patterns were defined by their arterial vasculature, e.g., Factors 3 and 9 representing mostly MCA coverage. The identified lesion atoms coincidently mirrored well-known functional brain circuits. Moreover, the respective lesion patterns generally fit well with the associated functions engaged in the applied tasks, as evidenced by neuropsychological assessments of language, motor, memory, and attention, as well as cognitive and executive control38,82,83. The fine-grained nature of the extracted lesion atoms also enabled us to bring into sharp focus fiber pathways of essential relevance for the human language capacity. The implicated lesioned anatomical tracts recapitulated the dorsal and ventral route of the dual-stream concept of language processing38,39, cerebral and cerebellar motor representations84, and visuo-spatial attention and executive control83,85. Overall, our analyses on language performance show a stronger impact of lesions in the left hemisphere, conforming to the widely held asymmetry of the human language network46.
The granularity of our lesion atoms further enabled us to dissect subcomponents of stroke effects in language-related pathways, especially the different perisylvian subsegments of the AF. Since the three-segment view of AF anatomy was proposed34, various studies ventured to examine the role that subcomponents of the AF play in realizing language function. Such studies initially suggested that the functions of the distinct fiber bundle segments differ: the direct pathway was associated with phonological processes, whereas the indirect anterior segment tended to serve semantically-based functions, and the posterior segment could serve especially language comprehension34. However, evidence from these studies have previously been hard to reconcile.
Some studies on aphasia after stroke linked the anterior segment of the left AF to impaired speech fluency, among other fiber tracts86,87. One study advocated significant language associations selectively for the posterior segment of AF88. Yet, other investigators reported no significant links between the damage to the subsegments of the AF and subsequent language function89. Based on our investigation of a large clinical cohort, we provide newly detailed evidence that dissects the major white matter pathways necessary for language production and understanding. In particular, our findings highlight the anterior and long segments as key subcomponents of the perisylvian route. Within the lesion atom of the dorsal pathway, both the anterior and long segments of the AF are further confirmed in the prediction of speech fluency in men and women. Indeed, our lesion atoms reflecting the left and right ventral language route further include the posterior segment of the AF. This finding suggests a shared essential piece of the dorsal and ventral language pathway and a contribution of the latter pathway to naming and semantic fluency deficits. Our observation ties into a previous lesion study which reported overlap between both streams in the left temporo-parietal region90. Going beyond a merely topographic interpretation, our study extends the previous findings by pointing to potentially shared underlying anatomical connections. Such an overlap seems plausible given that the associated language tasks, naming, and semantic fluency, likely invoke both fiber processing streams.
In both men and women, the strongest observed brain-behavior predictions were preferentially lateralized to the left hemisphere. We identified the fiber tracts of the left ILF, the IFOF, and the UF to be critically involved in naming and semantic fluency deficits in both sexes. The left AF was responsible for performance decline in phonemic fluency in women and men to a similar degree, which nicely mirrors earlier findings91,92. The involved anatomical tracts are in accord with incumbent theories around the dorsal and ventral language pathways38,39,41. As a limitation to these considerations, our identified lesion atoms also track, to a smaller extent, certain canonical tracts that were not typically interpretated to be related to language processing, such as motor projections. In other words, a modest lesion impact entailing motoric deficits cannot be completely ruled out, despite our umbrella-term summary as ‘dorsal/ventral language pathways’ to facilitate communication of our findings. Our lesion-outcome effects in semantic fluency and naming were shared by women and men. This observation highlights the importance of the ventral language route and some of its major white matter pathways, including the ILF, IFOF, and UF. These findings directly converge with previous analyses that collapsed across both sexes into crude average effects. In particular, our finding linking semantic fluency with the ventral stream resonates well with vast evidence from large-scale neuroimaging meta-analyses25,93, neurostimulation results in healthy participants94,95, lesion studies90,96, computational modeling studies97, and targeted intraoperative electro-stimulation of fiber tracts98,99.
Our analyses detailed brain-behavior associations of phonemic fluency to locate to the dorsal perisylvian route, congruently for both sexes. With the strong impetus of the AF fiber tract, our results are consistent with the association of the dorsal language stream with phonological processing in healthy volunteers34,41,100 and lesions in stroke patients90. Our predictive effects link the ventral and dorsal pathways to semantic and phonemic fluency, respectively. Both identified associations are aligned with findings from a variety of methodologies, including direct intraoperative electro-stimulation98,99, diffusion MRI tractography100,101, and lesion-symptom investigations in aphasia61,102,103,104,105,106. We confirm the structural relations in the dual-stream model in regard to the underlying language tasks. Our lesion findings shared by women and men are hence consistent with previous studies that were blind to sex-specific effects.
More generally, several previous efforts compounded evidence that male and female brains are distinct in the asymmetry of functional brain organization. Male brains appear to show more far-reaching segregation between the left and right hemispheric function. Instead, female brains are thought to have stronger interconnections between the left and right hemispheres50,107. According to an early hypothesis, the sharper distinction between left and right brain function, allegedly characteristic for men, was thought to promote spatial but impede verbal performance50,108. On a cognitive level, this sex divergence in brain lateralization was thought to explain why women outperformed the opposite sex in language tasks such as verbal fluency tests on average; as well as why men were supposed to typically exhibit greater spatial skills, such as in three-dimensional mental rotation tasks109,110. However, the respective effect sizes have been small and several meta-analyses called into question the organizational differences related to lateralization and language processing111,112,113.
In our sex-sensitive analyses, we found women to be more impaired by lesion damage in the left ventral pathway across different language tasks, including phonemic and semantic fluency. Moreover, we detailed a female-specific selective vulnerability to ventral lesion damage in phonemic fluency. Importantly, differences in lesion size or overall lesion topography were accounted for in our approach. As a limitation to our present study, handedness as a surrogate for the dominant hemisphere was not recorded. A relatively stronger role of the left ventral pathway in women is in line with previous work in healthy volunteers, demonstrating higher radial diffusivity in the left UF in women relative to men114.
In contrast, damage in the left-dominant ventral pathway and its right-hemispheric homolog was particularly informative about lost naming and semantic fluency capacities in men. Previous work suggested that the ventral language pathway is largely bilaterally organized, comprising parallel processing streams38,39. We expand the current literature body by adding evidence for a predominantly left-lateralized ventral dominance in women. In support of our findings, early analyses stratified by sex suggested that men have a symmetrical increase in white matter volume and concentration in the bilateral anterior temporal lobe115. Our findings receive further support in that healthy male volunteers showed increased gray matter volume and cortical thickness in several bilateral regions relative to females, although no relationship with speech tests was reported116,117. Notably, previous studies are inconclusive with respect to sex incongruencies in functional and structural substrates of language-related processes53,118. Our sex-aware analyses bear the potential to reconcile several important inconsistencies on structural lateralization effects in general and in the ventral language pathway in particular.
Indeed, our analyses brought into the open several sex-specific findings outside the canonical language circuits that shed new light on stroke-induced language deficits. Our sex-aware analysis framework offered evidence that men draw from bilateral ventral and cerebellar connections and potentially integrate more domain-general cognitive and executive functions via right-lateralized cingular fiber connections to enable efficient language processing after stroke. There is increasing evidence that many higher cognitive functions, including language processing, are supported by large-scale distributed networks82,119. Such parallel organization of networks may potentially aid recovery after aphasic stroke by the recruitment of other cognitive functions that compensate for the damaged language capacities120. In particular, additional domain-general networks may be upregulated to boost the performance of the damaged processes if the primary language system is compromised121,122,123. Damage to cingular fiber tracts may potentially undermine the increased recruitment of domain-general networks, including the “multiple-demand network” with special contributions to cognitive control83. The selective vulnerability we show for men in cingular pathways and bilateral temporal circuits may relate to previously identified sex-specific idiosyncrasies in white matter microstructure in healthy subjects117,124. The combination of core language network disruption and lesioned cingular pathways may hence reflect the complex balance of domain-specific and domain-general interplay for entertaining language functions.
In contrast, women accentuate left-dominant circuits, including structural connections of the fornix. A hippocampal–neocortical pathway through the fornix was previously suggested to be critical to the supra-modal brain network architecture of the default mode network (DMN, ref. 125). Large-scale association networks, such as the DMN, fronto-parietal control, and salience networks, are generally thought to occupy regions juxtaposed and interdigitated with the language network119,126,127. Altered supra-modal interactions with core language features via fornical fibers may hence reflect a dynamic process underlying neural remodeling in chronic aphasic stroke. Indeed, our findings emphasize a left hemispheric dominance of the fornical fibers. While the involvement of the left fornix in naming is a observation, it has already been implicated in other language facets, including semantic fluency reflecting the retrieval of episodic context128,129. Importantly, our findings capture the subacute phase of stroke; therefore, the dynamic of reorganization may still change. Possibly, the altered language-DMN unit may affect language outcomes. Previous work has described disrupted DMN function in chronic stroke patients collapsed across sexes for impairment in motor function130,131,132 as well as language function133,134,135,136. Both the language-specific as well as domain-general disruption were suggested to influence post-stroke language outcome. However, the exact associations remain to be delineated.
Our findings speak in favor of revising the view towards sex-differentiated disruption of DMN integration. General sex divergences in DMN function in healthy individuals were previously demonstrated, indicating that women have higher connectivity within the DMN117. The authors suggested that the higher intra-DMN connectivity may help explain the higher average female ability in different cognitive domains. The selective vulnerability to the fornix in women is further supported by a previous diffusion tensor investigation on healthy volunteers showing higher fractional anisotropy in women specifically in the hippocampus output pathway via the fornix124. Moreover, in chronic stroke patients, the hippocampal-neocortical connectivity to the inferior parietal lobule (IPL) was consistently found to be decreased compared to healthy controls137.
In fact, the IPL represents one potential hub for multi-sensory integration of domain-specific and supra-modal processes125. Previous work has linked the IPL with semantic aspects of language processing, social cognition, and critical switch in stimulus-driven control of attention and diversion of self-reflective thinking to processing salient external stimuli125,138,139,140. It receives axonal inputs from the posterior segment of the AF, as a short vertical tract connecting Wernicke’s with Geschwind’s areas34. Our results further emphasize the relevance of the IPL and underlying posterior AF as seen in the dominance of the ventral lesion atom in women across all applied language tasks. Our findings converge with evidence suggesting negative modulatory connections from the parietal lobule to the superior temporal gyrus in females, enabling highly efficient semantic representations53. Similarly, higher regional efficiency was reported in females in the left IPL and superior temporal regions in network connectivity analysis in neurologically intact participants141.
Building on studies on healthy individuals, we confirm the relevance of the left IPL, fornix, and DMN in ischemic stroke patients. Our lesion-outcome findings in women may potentially reconcile previous observations and offer an explanation to sex divergences in chronic aphasia outcomes. More importantly, the personalized prediction of long-term post-stroke recovery using sex-aware stroke lesion topology may bring value to future individualized treatment interventions. Intensive speech therapy was previously shown to promote more efficient DMN integration leading to consequent language improvement142,143,144,145. Targeted rehabilitation in men and women may hence advance therapy-induced neuroplasticity by enabling more efficient multimodal network integration.
Methods
Prospective stroke population resource
We analyzed a multi-center stroke registry with 1401 patients. They were retrospectively selected from the Bundang and Hallym Vascular Cognitive Impairment cohorts, which are prospectively recruited cohorts consisting of patients originally admitted to the Seoul National University Bundang Hospital or Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital in South Korea between 2007 and 2018146. Patients were hospitalized and diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke. All patients were eligible for the present study based on the following criteria: (1) availability of brain MRI showing acute tissue infarction in the diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and/or fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), (2) successful lesion segmentation and registration, (3) no primary intracerebral hemorrhage, and (4) availability of follow-up data on key demographics and neuropsychological assessment (the 60-min Korean-Vascular Cognitive Impairment Harmonization Standards-Neuropsychology Protocol147,148). The local institutional review boards of each hospital approved the study protocol and gave waived consent requirements based on the retrospective nature of this study and minimal risks to participants.
Characteristics of stroke patient cohort
The neuropsychological performance of the patients was profiled by a rich battery of tests (cf. distributions in Supplementary Figure 1) ~3 months (Hallym: 91.4 days (SD 38.9), Bundang: 105.7 days (SD 94.1)) after the acute onset of stroke147. For the purpose of our present study, we primarily focused on two key facets of post-stroke language performance: (i) naming ability (Korean short version of the Boston Naming Test (BN)70), and (ii) speech fluency (phonemic and semantic fluency (PF, and SF, respectively; ref. 147). The BN task prompts patients to name 15 pictured nouns (short version). In the semantic fluency tasks, patients are instructed to generate as many words as possible belonging to a specific category, such as animals, within a one-minute time window. In the phonemic fluency task, in turn, patients are asked to generate words starting with a given phoneme (e.g., giut, iung, or siut, which correspond to the international phonemic alphabet phonemes of g, ŋ, and s, respectively). These fluency tests have been previously validated in the Korean language149. A diverse collection of general cognitive tests included the Korean Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Seoul Verbal Learning test (SVLT), the Rey Complex Figures test (RCFT), Digital symbol coding, and the Korean-Trail Making Tests Elderly’s version A and B (TMT). The Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) was used to capture the cognitive performance before the ischemic event150. This established retrospective assessment variant relied on health-proxy reports to evaluate the cognitive change within the period 10 years prior to the ischemic stroke. All tests and questionnaires were conducted by a trained clinical psychometrician blinded to any clinical or neuroradiological patient information151. Available sociodemographic and clinical information included age, sex, years of education, and lesion volume (Table 1). All continuous variables were adjusted to a comparable scale by mean centering to zero and variance scaling to one.
Neuroimaging data preprocessing
Whole-brain MRI scans were typically acquired within the first week after the stroke event. The scanning protocol included structural axial T1, T2-weighted spin-echo, FLAIR, and DWI sequences (3.0 T, Achieva scanner, Philips Healthcare, Netherlands; cf. Neuroimaging protocols below). Tissue damage was manually segmented on DWI or less frequently FLAIR images by experienced investigators (A.K.K. and G.A.) relying on in-house developed software based on MeVisLab (MeVis Medical Solutions AG, Bremen, Germany; ref. 152). Lesion segmentations were checked and potentially refined by two additional experienced raters. Brain scans and their corresponding lesion segmentations were linearly and nonlinearly normalized to Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI-152) reference space employing the publicly available RegLSM image processing pipeline153. Quality of normalization was rigorously controlled by an experienced rater and if necessary, manually corrected.
Neuroimaging protocols
(1) Seoul National University Bundang Hospital: The MRI protocols comprised diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), axial T1- and T2-weighted spin echo, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging (FLAIR), gradient-echo imaging, and coronal T1-weighted spin echo imaging. FLAIR imaging was acquired using a fast-spin echo sequence with the acquisition parameters: repetition time: 11,000 ms; echo time: 125 ms; inversion time: 2800 ms; slice thickness 5 mm; intersection gap 1 mm; matrix: 512 × 512; flip angle 90 degrees. DWI imaging was obtained employing an EPI-spin echo sequence with the acquisition parameters: repetition time: 5000 ms; echo time: 50 ms; diffusion b-value: 1000; slice thickness: 5 mm; intersection gap: 1 mm; matrix: 256 × 256; flip angle 90 degrees. (2) Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital: The MRI protocols comprised DWI, axial T1- and T2-weighted spin echo, FLAIR, gradient-echo imaging, and coronal T2-weighted spin echo imaging. FLAIR imaging acquisition parameters: repetition time: 11,000 ms; echo time: 125 ms; inversion time: 2800 ms; slice thickness: 5 mm; matrix: 512 × 512; flip angle 90 degrees. DWI image acquisition parameters: repetition time: 3000 ms; echo time: 56 ms; diffusion b-value: 1000; slice thickness: 5 mm; matrix: 256 × 256; flip angle 90 degrees.
Data-led deconvolution of hidden lesion atoms
We sought to explore the coherent patterns that may combine to make up the topographical distribution of stroke lesions in white matter. First, we parsed each patient’s lesion fingerprint by summarizing the white matter damage annotations at the voxel level according to fiber tract definitions from a reference tractography atlas35,49,154. This widely-used atlas provided spatial definitions of 28 major fiber tracts in MNI standard space22,86,155,156,157. In doing so, the tract-by-tract summaries of lesion loads separately tracked the left and right hemispheres, which enabled the modeling of subtle differences in hemispheric lateralization in downstream analysis steps49,158.
Of particular relevance to the present investigation due to their roles in human-defining language capacity, we captured the neuroanatomy of the core perisylvian circuitry by the canonical arcuate fasciculus (AF), subdivided into (i) long, (ii) anterior, and (iii) posterior segments of the tract30,31,34,35. The ventral pathway consisted of the uncinate fasciculus (UF), the inferior longitudinal fasciculus (IFL), and the inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (IFOF)25,41,44,159. Limbic pathways included the fornix and cingular white matter bundles35. Motor projections were taken into account by the internal capsule (IC), the corticospinal tract (CST), and cerebellar connections, including the cortico-pontine-cerebellar tract (CPC) and the inferior and superior cerebellar peduncle (ICP, SCP, respectively). The topography of atlas fiber tracts directly informed the labeling of the derived lesion atoms. For consistency, the resulting lesion atoms of the language system were labeled according to widely acknowledged definitions of the dual-stream model of language39. We log2-transformed and concatenated the measures of each of the 28 tract measures of lesion loads for all 1401 patients. Once each tract lesion load91,92 was recorded in each patient, we carried out non-negative matrix factorization (NNMF) as a multivariate pattern discovery strategy71. This unsupervised machine-learning algorithm can identify the topological form and patient-specific combination of lesion pattern expressions that make up the white matter disconnection inflicted by stroke. In accordance with our recent stroke studies56,72, the derived sum-of-parts representation was henceforth referred to as lesion atoms.
More formally, NNMF achieves a low-rank approximation of the data V, with V reflecting the lesion load summaries of 28 tracts, with dimensions m × n (m = number of tracts in the atlas, n = number of patients), by partitioning the interindividual variation in white matter strokes into a matrix W of k part-based factor representations. The latent pattern expression matrix H indicated how relevant each emerging lesion atom is to describe the constituent parts of an individual patient’s overall brain lesion distribution. The patient-specific expression of a given lesion atom shows how well each of the discovered lesion archetypes fits the stroke lesion found in the individual patient. W and H thus carried m × k and k × n dimensions, respectively. Given by V = WH, the latent factorization hence deconvolved the actual lesion constellation in a particular patient into a parts-based representation. Each individual patient’s brain-imaging-derived spatial lesion distribution can hence express the archetypal lesion atom configurations on a continuous scale.
In contrast to alternative dimensionality reduction tools, NNMF provided at least two important advantages for the goal of the present study. First, the non-negative value encoding of the differential white matter involvement and the inherent non-negativity constraint of the NNMF algorithm allows for intuitive neurobiologically meaningful interpretation. For each patient j, the latent pattern expression Hj offered a directly interpretable model of the lesion variation across patients in our cohort. In contrast, alternative matrix factorization algorithms, such as principal component analysis, typically recover patterns by incurring various cancellations between positive and negative pattern loadings. Such alternative treatment of the derived hidden parts-of-whole representations would have hurt intuitive neurobiological meaning. By means of strictly additive combinations of pattern contributions (allowing for no subtractions), NNMF allows for biologically more meaningful and interpretable representations of lesion constellations. Second, classical clustering approaches for dimensionality reduction would consider the effect of each differential tract involvement once only. In contrast, by embracing NNMF, damage to each white matter tract in the reference atlas has the opportunity to belong to multiple latent factors of W in continuous degrees. In this way, each tract lesion load could play a distinct role in different lesion atoms, each of which reflected extracted lesion-specific topological motifs distributed across the whole white matter.
Predicting language outcome at 3 months post-stroke from patient-specific lesion fingerprints
The thus derived lesion atoms served as a low-dimensional summary of the individual lesion fingerprints. Expression degrees of these lesion patterns, specific to each particular stroke patient, provided the input to our Bayesian model160 to explain the interindividual differences in language performance outcomes at ~3 months after the stroke event. A Bayesian modeling approach can be a richly informative procedure while automatically accounting for modeling complexity65,161. The resulting probabilistic statements quantify brain-lesion-behavior links and offer principled estimates of uncertainty around all model parameters at play67,162. Therefore, modeling dependencies between multiple sources of variability including subtle sex effects, covariates, such as age, and brain-lesion idiosyncrasies, such as lateralization, can enhance the inferential granularity of conclusions at each hierarchical level. In adopting a Bayesian generative modeling tactic, we aimed to obtain fully probabilistic parameter estimates that could inform us about effect strength and effect certainty of how each particular lesion pattern is responsible for the clinical outcome. To place a special focus on the putative effects of sex divergences on post-stroke language performance, we introduced dedicated model parameters, which allowed to estimate each pattern regression slope in a sex-specific manner. That is, we could estimate the overlapping and distinct roles of each lesion atom in tracking cognitive facets of language in women and men separately within an integrated modeling solution. The model structure was as follows:
A separate probabilistic Bayesian model was estimated for each dedicated post-stroke performance score in each of the target language domains: BN, SF, and PF (cf. above; for other cognitive assessments see Supplementary Figs. 4–15). All analyses were appropriately adjusted for variation that could be explained by the covariates age, age2, sex, education in years, pre-morbid cognitive performance, and total lesion volume. We adjusted for age-specific effects by considering the bare age and its squared value and, therefore, captured possible u-shaped effects. Our parametric model specification also included sex as a covariate to take into account outcome differences that were independent and dependent of the lesion configurations captured in the NNMF-derived lesion atom representations (see refs. 56,72). Samples from the posterior distribution of the model parameters were drawn by the No U-Turn Sampler (NUTS, ref. 163), a kind of Monte Carlo Markov Chain algorithm (in our setting defaulted to draws = 5000).
To evaluate the practical usefulness of the thus inferred posterior parameter distributions, we computed posterior predictive checks for every analysis of a given language performance outcome. These model-based simulations of new data were then compared to the observed data to determine the predictive performance measured as coefficient of determination (R2). That is, we assessed the model-simulated outcome predictions generated by our Bayesian model to approximate an external validation based on our patient cohort. This empirical procedure is a well-recognized option for judging the adequacy of Bayesian models given the actual data at hand65,164.
Statistics and reproducibility
Data analyses were conducted in a Python 3.8.5 (IPython 7.21.0) environment and primarily relied on the packages nilearn, scikit-learn, and pymc3165,166. The probabilistic tractography atlas is available at: https://www.natbrainlab.co.uk/atlas-maps. The use of dynamic reporting guarantees full reproducibility of the results.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
Additional data are made available in the Supplementary Online Material. Source data for Figs. 4 and 5 can be found in https://github.com/jkernbach/bayesian_stroke. Other data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Code availability
Full code is accessible to and open for reuse by the reader here: https://github.com/jkernbach/bayesian_stroke.
References
Timmis, A. et al. European Society of Cardiology: cardiovascular disease statistics 2017. Eur. Heart J. 39, 508–579 (2018).
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevalence and most common causes of disability among adults–United States, 2005. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 58, 421–426 (2009).
Wafa, H. A. et al. Burden of stroke in Europe: thirty-year projections of incidence, prevalence, deaths, and disability-adjusted life years. Stroke 51, 2418–2427 (2020).
Bushnell, C. et al. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in women: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 45, 1545–1588 (2014).
Giroud, M. et al. Temporal trends in sex differences with regard to stroke incidence: the Dijon stroke registry (1987-2012). Stroke 48, 846–849 (2017).
Luengo-Fernandez, R., Violato, M., Candio, P. & Leal, J. Economic burden of stroke across Europe: a population-based cost analysis. Eur. Stroke J. 5, 17–25 (2020).
Olesen, J. et al. The economic cost of brain disorders in Europe. Eur. J. Neurol. 19, 155–162 (2012).
Engelter, S. T. et al. Epidemiology of aphasia attributable to first ischemic stroke: incidence, severity, fluency, etiology, and thrombolysis. Stroke 37, 1379–1384 (2006).
Feigin, V. L., Norrving, B. & Mensah, G. A. Global burden of stroke. Circ. Res. 120, 439–448 (2017).
Feigin, V. L. et al. Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990–2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 383, 245–255 (2014).
Pedersen, P., Vinter, K. & Olsen, T. S. Aphasia after stroke: type, severity and prognosis. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 17, 35–43 (2004).
Laska, A. C., Hellblom, A., Murray, V., Kahan, T. & Von Arbin, M. Aphasia in acute stroke and relation to outcome. J. Intern. Med. 249, 413–422 (2001).
Gialanella, B. & Prometti, P. Rehabilitation length of stay in patients suffering from aphasia after stroke. Top. Stroke Rehabil. 16, 437–444 (2009).
Silva, G. S. et al. Gender differences in outcomes after ischemic stroke: role of ischemic lesion volume and intracranial large-artery occlusion. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 30, 470–475 (2010).
Hier, D. B., Yoon, W. B., Mohr, J. P., Price, T. R. & Wolf, P. A. Gender and aphasia in the Stroke Data Bank. Brain Lang. 47, 155–167 (1994).
Button, K. S. et al. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 14, 365–376 (2013).
Nord, C. L., Valton, V., Wood, J. & Roiser, J. P. Power-up: a reanalysis of’power failure’in neuroscience using mixture modeling. J. Neurosci. 37, 8051–8061 (2017).
Wallentin, M. Sex differences in post-stroke aphasia rates are caused by age. A meta-analysis and database query. PLoS ONE 13, e0209571 (2018).
Joel, D. et al. Sex beyond the genitalia: the human brain mosaic. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 15468–15473 (2015).
Wu, O. et al. Role of acute lesion topography in initial ischemic stroke severity and long-term functional outcomes. Stroke 46, 2438–2444 (2015).
Ramsey, L. E. et al. Behavioural clusters and predictors of performance during recovery from stroke. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1, 0038 (2017).
Corbetta, M. et al. Common behavioral clusters and subcortical anatomy in stroke. Neuron 85, 927–941 (2015).
Price, C. J. A review and synthesis of the first 20 years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading. Neuroimage 62, 816–847 (2012).
Vigneau, M. et al. What is right-hemisphere contribution to phonological, lexico-semantic, and sentence processing? Insights from a meta-analysis. Neuroimage 54, 577–593 (2011).
Vigneau, M. et al. Meta-analyzing left hemisphere language areas: phonology, semantics, and sentence processing. Neuroimage 30, 1414–1432 (2006).
Hesling, I., Labache, L., Joliot, M. & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. Large-scale plurimodal networks common to listening to, producing and reading word lists: an fMRI study combining task-induced activation and intrinsic connectivity in 144 right-handers. Brain Struct. Funct. 224, 3075–3094 (2019).
Labache, L. et al. A SENtence Supramodal Areas AtlaS (SENSAAS) based on multiple task-induced activation mapping and graph analysis of intrinsic connectivity in 144 healthy right-handers. Brain Struct. Funct. 224, 859–882 (2019).
Roger, E. et al. Unraveling the functional attributes of the language connectome: crucial subnetworks, flexibility and variability. Neuroimage 263, 119672 (2022).
Dronkers, N. & Ogar, J. Brain areas involved in speech production. Brain 127, 1461–1462 (2004).
Dick, A. S. & Tremblay, P. Beyond the arcuate fasciculus: consensus and controversy in the connectional anatomy of language. Brain 135, 3529–3550 (2012).
Catani, M. & Mesulam, M. The arcuate fasciculus and the disconnection theme in language and aphasia: History and current state. Cortex 44, 953–961 (2008).
Dejerine, J., Dejerine, J. & Dejerine, A. Anatomie des Centres Nerveux (Rueff, 1895).
Geschwind, N. The organization of language and the brain. Science 170, 940–944 (1970).
Catani, M., Jones, D. K. & Ffytche, D. H. Perisylvian language networks of the human brain. Ann. Neurol. 57, 8–16 (2005).
Catani, M. & Thiebaut de Schotten, M. A diffusion tensor imaging tractography atlas for virtual in vivo dissections. Cortex 44, 1105–1132 (2008).
Rilling, J. K. et al. The evolution of the arcuate fasciculus revealed with comparative DTI. Nat. Neurosci. 11, 426–428 (2008).
Hickok, G. The functional neuroanatomy of language. Phys. Life Rev. 6, 121–143 (2009).
Hickok, G. & Poeppel, D. The cortical organization of speech processing. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8, 393–402 (2007).
Hickok, G. & Poeppel, D. Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language. Cognition 92, 67–99 (2004).
Hickok, G. & Poeppel, D. Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4, 131–138 (2000).
Saur, D. et al. Ventral and dorsal pathways for language. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 18035–18040 (2008).
Rauschecker, J. P. & Tian, B. Mechanisms and streams for processing of ‘what’ and ‘where’ in auditory cortex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 11800–11806 (2000).
Papagno, C. et al. What is the role of the uncinate fasciculus? Surgical removal and proper name retrieval. Brain 134, 405–414 (2011).
Catani, M., Jones, D. K., Donato, R. & Ffytche, D. H. Occipito‐temporal connections in the human brain. Brain 126, 2093–2107 (2003).
Eichert, N. et al. What is special about the human arcuate fasciculus? Lateralization, projections, and expansion. Cortex 118, 107–115 (2019).
Hartwigsen, G., Bengio, Y. & Bzdok, D. How does hemispheric specialization contribute to human-defining cognition? Neuron 109, 2075–2090 (2021).
Gerrits, R., Verhelst, H. & Vingerhoets, G. Mirrored brain organization: Statistical anomaly or reversal of hemispheric functional segregation bias? Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 14057–14065 (2020).
Labache, L. et al. Typical and atypical language brain organization based on intrinsic connectivity and multitask functional asymmetries. Elife 9, e58722 (2020).
Thiebaut de Schotten, M. et al. Atlasing location, asymmetry and inter-subject variability of white matter tracts in the human brain with MR diffusion tractography. Neuroimage 54, 49–59 (2011).
Shaywitz, B. A. et al. Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language. Nature 373, 607–609 (1995).
Grabowski, T. J., Damasio, H., Eichhorn, G. R. & Tranel, D. Effects of gender on blood flow correlates of naming concrete entities. Neuroimage 20, 940–954 (2003).
Piefke, M., Weiss, P. H., Markowitsch, H. J. & Fink, G. R. Gender differences in the functional neuroanatomy of emotional episodic autobiographical memory. Hum. Brain Mapp. 24, 313–324 (2005).
Xu, M. et al. Sex differences in functional brain networks for language. Cereb. Cortex 30, 1528–1537 (2020).
Bonkhoff, A. K., Karch, A., Weber, R., Wellmann, J. & Berger, K. Female stroke: sex differences in acute treatment and early outcomes of acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 52, 406–415 (2021).
Dehlendorff, C., Andersen, K. K. & Olsen, T. S. Sex disparities in stroke: women have more severe strokes but better survival than men. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 4, e001967 (2015).
Bonkhoff, A. K. et al. Outcome after acute ischemic stroke is linked to sex-specific lesion patterns. Nat. Commun. 12, 3289 (2021).
Reeves, M. J. et al. Sex differences in stroke: epidemiology, clinical presentation, medical care, and outcomes. Lancet Neurol. 7, 915–926 (2008).
Di Carlo, A. et al. Sex differences in the clinical presentation, resource use, and 3-month outcome of acute stroke in Europe: data from a multicenter multinational hospital-based registry. Stroke 34, 1114–1119 (2003).
Holroyd-Leduc, J. M., Kapral, M. K., Austin, P. C. & Tu, J. V. Sex differences and similarities in the management and outcome of stroke patients. Stroke 31, 1833–1837 (2000).
Baldo, J. V., Arévalo, A., Patterson, J. P. & Dronkers, N. F. Grey and white matter correlates of picture naming: evidence from a voxel-based lesion analysis of the Boston Naming Test. Cortex 49, 658–667 (2013).
Mirman, D. et al. Neural organization of spoken language revealed by lesion–symptom mapping. Nat. Commun. 6, 1–9 (2015).
Bates, E. et al. Voxel-based lesion–symptom mapping. Nat. Neurosci. 6, 448–450 (2003).
Smith, D. V., Clithero, J. A., Rorden, C. & Karnath, H.-O. Decoding the anatomical network of spatial attention. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 1518–1523 (2013).
Bonilha, L. et al. Temporal lobe networks supporting the comprehension of spoken words. Brain 140, 2370–2380 (2017).
Gelman, A. et al. Bayesian Data Analysis (Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2013).
Efron, B. in Breakthroughs in Statistics: Methodology and Distribution (eds. Kotz, S. & Johnson, N. L.) 569–593 (Springer New York, 1992).
Bzdok, D., Floris, D. L. & Marquand, A. F. Analysing brain networks in population neuroscience: a case for the Bayesian philosophy. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 375, 20190661 (2020).
Bzdok, D., Floris, D. L. & Marquand, A. F. Analysing brain networks in population neuroscience: a case for the Bayesian philosophy. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 375, 20190661 (2020).
Bishop, C. M. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Springer New York, 2006).
Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H. & Weintraub, S. The Boston Naming Test (Lea & Febiger, 1983).
Lee, D. D. & Seung, H. S. Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization. Nature 401, 788–791 (1999).
Bonkhoff, A. K. et al. Generative lesion pattern decomposition of cognitive impairment after stroke. Brain Commun 3, fcab110 (2021).
Ross, D. A. & Zemel, R. S. Learning parts-based representations of data. https://www.jmlr.org/papers/volume7/ross06a/ross06a.pdf (2006).
Devarajan, K. Nonnegative matrix factorization: an analytical and interpretive tool in computational biology. PLoS Comput. Biol. 4, e1000029 (2008).
Lever, J., Krzywinski, M. & Altman, N. Points of significance: principal component analysis. Nat. Methods 14, 641–642 (2017).
James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T. & Tibshirani, R. An Introduction to Statistical Learning (Springer US, 2013).
Sperber, C. Rethinking causality and data complexity in brain lesion-behaviour inference and its implications for lesion-behaviour modelling. Cortex 126, 49–62 (2020).
Pustina, D., Avants, B., Faseyitan, O. K., Medaglia, J. D. & Coslett, H. B. Improved accuracy of lesion to symptom mapping with multivariate sparse canonical correlations. Neuropsychologia 115, 154–166 (2018).
Basilakos, A., Rorden, C., Bonilha, L., Moser, D. & Fridriksson, J. Patterns of poststroke brain damage that predict speech production errors in apraxia of speech and aphasia dissociate. Stroke 46, 1561–1566 (2015).
Harvey, D. Y. & Schnur, T. T. Distinct loci of lexical and semantic access deficits in aphasia: Evidence from voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping and diffusion tensor imaging. Cortex 67, 37–58 (2015).
Cahill, L. Why sex matters for neuroscience. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 477–484 (2006).
Fedorenko, E., Duncan, J. & Kanwisher, N. Broad domain generality in focal regions of frontal and parietal cortex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 16616–16621 (2013).
Duncan, J. & Owen, A. M. Common regions of the human frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands. Trends Neurosci. 23, 475–483 (2000).
Schmahmann, J. D., Doyon, J., Petrides, M., Evans, A. C. & Toga, A. W. MRI Atlas of the Human Cerebellum (Academic, 2000).
De Schotten, M. T. et al. A lateralized brain network for visuo-spatial attention. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 1245–1246 (2011).
Fridriksson, J., Guo, D., Fillmore, P., Holland, A. & Rorden, C. Damage to the anterior arcuate fasciculus predicts non-fluent speech production in aphasia. Brain 136, 3451–3460 (2013).
Basilakos, A. et al. Regional white matter damage predicts speech fluency in chronic post-stroke aphasia. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8, 845 (2014).
Ivanova, M. V. et al. Diffusion-tensor imaging of major white matter tracts and their role in language processing in aphasia. Cortex 85, 165–181 (2016).
Yu, Q., Wang, H., Li, S. & Dai, Y. Predictive role of subcomponents of the left arcuate fasciculus in prognosis of aphasia after stroke: a retrospective observational study. Medicine 98, e15775 (2019).
Fridriksson, J. et al. Revealing the dual streams of speech processing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 15108–15113 (2016).
Marchina, S. et al. Impairment of speech production predicted by lesion load of the left arcuate fasciculus. Stroke 42, 2251–2256 (2011).
Wang, J., Marchina, S., Norton, A. C., Wan, C. Y. & Schlaug, G. Predicting speech fluency and naming abilities in aphasic patients. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7, 831 (2013).
Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W. & Conant, L. L. Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cereb. Cortex 19, 2767–2796 (2009).
Pobric, G., Jefferies, E. & Ralph, M. A. L. Anterior temporal lobes mediate semantic representation: mimicking semantic dementia by using rTMS in normal participants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 20137–20141 (2007).
Woollams, A. M. Apples are not the only fruit: the effects of concept typicality on semantic representation in the anterior temporal lobe. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6, 85 (2012).
Bonilha, L. et al. Neural structures supporting spontaneous and assisted (entrained) speech fluency. Brain 142, 3951–3962 (2019).
Ueno, T., Saito, S., Rogers, T. T. & Lambon Ralph, M. A. Lichtheim 2: synthesizing aphasia and the neural basis of language in a neurocomputational model of the dual dorsal-ventral language pathways. Neuron 72, 385–396 (2011).
Duffau, H. et al. New insights into the anatomo-functional connectivity of the semantic system: a study using cortico-subcortical electrostimulations. Brain 128, 797–810 (2005).
Leclercq, D. et al. Comparison of diffusion tensor imaging tractography of language tracts and intraoperative subcortical stimulations. J. Neurosurg. 112, 503–511 (2010).
Parker, G. J. M. et al. Lateralization of ventral and dorsal auditory-language pathways in the human brain. Neuroimage 24, 656–666 (2005).
Glasser, M. F. & Rilling, J. K. DTI tractography of the human brain’s language pathways. Cereb. Cortex 18, 2471–2482 (2008).
Biesbroek, J. M. et al. Shared and distinct anatomical correlates of semantic and phonemic fluency revealed by lesion-symptom mapping in patients with ischemic stroke. Brain Struct. Funct. 221, 2123–2134 (2016).
Kümmerer, D. et al. Damage to ventral and dorsal language pathways in acute aphasia. Brain 136, 619–629 (2013).
Faroqi-Shah, Y. et al. Lesion analysis of language production deficits in aphasia. Aphasiology 28, 258–277 (2014).
Zhang, J. et al. Multifunctional roles of the ventral stream in language models: advanced segmental quantification in post-stroke aphasic patients. Front. Neurol. 9, 89 (2018).
Butler, R. A., Lambon Ralph, M. A. & Woollams, A. M. Capturing multidimensionality in stroke aphasia: mapping principal behavioural components to neural structures. Brain 137, 3248–3266 (2014).
Jaeger, J. J. et al. Sex differences in brain regions activated by grammatical and reading tasks. Neuroreport 9, 2803–2807 (1998).
Levy, J. In Cerebral Correlates Conscious Experience (eds. Buser, P. & Rougeul-Buser, A.) 285–298 (North Holland Publishing Co., 1978).
Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E. & Rosenkrantz, P. S. Sex-role stereotypes: a current appraisal. J. Soc. Issues 28, 59–78 (1972).
Hyde, J. S. Sex and cognition: gender and cognitive functions. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 38, 53–56 (2016).
Hirnstein, M., Hugdahl, K. & Hausmann, M. Cognitive sex differences and hemispheric asymmetry: a critical review of 40 years of research. Laterality 24, 204–252 (2019).
Wallentin, M. Putative sex differences in verbal abilities and language cortex: a critical review. Brain Lang. 108, 175–183 (2009).
Ruigrok, A. N. V. et al. A meta-analysis of sex differences in human brain structure. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 39, 34–50 (2014).
Jung, M. et al. Sex differences in white matter pathways related to language ability. Front. Neurosci. 13, 898 (2019).
Good, C. D. et al. Cerebral asymmetry and the effects of sex and handedness on brain structure: a voxel-based morphometric analysis of 465 normal adult human brains. Neuroimage 14, 685–700 (2001).
Angelopoulou, G. et al. Investigating gray and white matter structural substrates of sex differences in the narrative abilities of healthy adults. Front. Neurosci. 13, 1424 (2019).
Ritchie, S. J. et al. Sex differences in the adult human brain: evidence from 5216 UK Biobank participants. Cereb. Cortex 28, 2959–2975 (2018).
Ullman, M. T., Miranda, R. A. & Travers, M. L. in Sex Differences in the Brain 291–310 (Oxford University Press, 2007).
Braga, R. M., DiNicola, L. M., Becker, H. C. & Buckner, R. L. Situating the left-lateralized language network in the broader organization of multiple specialized large-scale distributed networks. J. Neurophysiol. 124, 1415–1448 (2020).
Brownsett, S. L. E. et al. Cognitive control and its impact on recovery from aphasic stroke. Brain 137, 242–254 (2014).
Geranmayeh, F., Brownsett, S. L. E. & Wise, R. J. S. Task-induced brain activity in aphasic stroke patients: what is driving recovery? Brain 137, 2632–2648 (2014).
Geranmayeh, F., Chau, T. W., Wise, R. J. S., Leech, R. & Hampshire, A. Domain-general subregions of the medial prefrontal cortex contribute to recovery of language after stroke. Brain 140, 1947–1958 (2017).
Stockert, A. et al. Dynamics of language reorganization after left temporo-parietal and frontal stroke. Brain 143, 844–861 (2020).
Inano, S., Takao, H., Hayashi, N., Abe, O. & Ohtomo, K. Effects of age and gender on white matter integrity. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 32, 2103–2109 (2011).
Kernbach, J. M. et al. Subspecialization within default mode nodes characterized in 10,000 UK Biobank participants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 12295–12300 (2018).
Thomas Yeo, B. T. et al. The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J. Neurophysiol. 106, 1125–1165 (2011).
Margulies, D. S. et al. Situating the default-mode network along a principal gradient of macroscale cortical organization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 12574–12579 (2016).
Biesbroek, J. M. et al. Anatomy of phonemic and semantic fluency: a lesion and disconnectome study in 1231 stroke patients. Cortex 143, 148–163 (2021).
Hodgetts, C. J. et al. Distinct contributions of the fornix and inferior longitudinal fasciculus to episodic and semantic autobiographical memory. Cortex 94, 1–14 (2017).
Zhang, Y. et al. Abnormal functional networks in resting-state of the sub-cortical chronic stroke patients with hemiplegia. Brain Res. 1663, 51–58 (2017).
Zhao, Z. et al. Altered intra- and inter-network functional coupling of resting-state networks associated with motor dysfunction in stroke. Hum. Brain Mapp. 39, 3388–3397 (2018).
Bonkhoff, A. K. et al. Abnormal dynamic functional connectivity is linked to recovery after acute ischemic stroke. Hum. Brain Mapp. 42, 2278–2291 (2021).
Balaev, V., Petrushevsky, A. & Martynova, O. Changes in functional connectivity of default mode network with auditory and right frontoparietal networks in poststroke aphasia. Brain Connect. 6, 714–723 (2016).
Siegel, J. S. et al. Disruptions of network connectivity predict impairment in multiple behavioral domains after stroke. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E4367–76 (2016).
Wang, C. et al. Altered functional organization within and between resting-state networks in chronic subcortical infarction. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 34, 597–605 (2014).
Tuladhar, A. M. et al. Default mode network connectivity in stroke patients. PLoS ONE 8, e66556 (2013).
Jung, J. et al. Altered hippocampal functional connectivity patterns in patients with cognitive impairments following ischaemic stroke: a resting-state fMRI study. Neuroimage Clin. 32, 102742 (2021).
Binder, J. R. & Desai, R. H. The neurobiology of semantic memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 15, 527–536 (2011).
Bays, P. M., Singh-Curry, V., Gorgoraptis, N., Driver, J. & Husain, M. Integration of goal- and stimulus-related visual signals revealed by damage to human parietal cortex. J. Neurosci. 30, 5968–5978 (2010).
Bzdok, D. et al. Left inferior parietal lobe engagement in social cognition and language. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 68, 319–334 (2016).
Gong, G. et al. Age- and gender-related differences in the cortical anatomical network. J. Neurosci. 29, 15684–15693 (2009).
Marcotte, K., Perlbarg, V., Marrelec, G., Benali, H. & Ansaldo, A. I. Default-mode network functional connectivity in aphasia: therapy-induced neuroplasticity. Brain Lang. 124, 45–55 (2013).
Musso, M. et al. Training-induced brain plasticity in aphasia. Brain 122(Pt. 9), 1781–1790 (1999).
Abo, M. et al. Language-related brain function during word repetition in post-stroke aphasics. Neuroreport 15, 1891–1894 (2004).
Dreyer, F. R. et al. Increased recruitment of domain-general neural networks in language processing following intensive language-action therapy: fMRI evidence from people with chronic aphasia. Am. J. Speech Lang. Pathol. 30, 455–465 (2021).
Kim, B. J. et al. Case characteristics, hyperacute treatment, and outcome information from the clinical research center for stroke-fifth division registry in South Korea. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 17, 38–53 (2015).
Yu, K.-H. et al. Cognitive impairment evaluated with Vascular Cognitive Impairment Harmonization Standards in a multicenter prospective stroke cohort in Korea. Stroke 44, 786–788 (2013).
Hachinski, V. et al. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke–Canadian Stroke Network Vascular Cognitive Impairment Harmonization Standards. Stroke 37, 2220–2241 (2006).
Kang, Y., Chin, J.-H., Na, D. L., Lee, J. & Park, J. S. A normative study of the Korean version of Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) in the elderly. Korean J. Clin. Psychol. 19, 385–392 (2000).
Lee, D. W. et al. Validity of the Korean version of Informant Questionnaire on the Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE). J. Korean Geriatr. Soc. 9, 196–202 (2005).
Lim, J.-S. et al. Cortical hubs and subcortical cholinergic pathways as neural substrates of poststroke dementia. Stroke 45, 1069–1076 (2014).
Ritter, F. et al. Medical image analysis. IEEE Pulse 2, 60–70 (2011).
Weaver, N. A. et al. The Meta VCI Map consortium for meta-analyses on strategic lesion locations for vascular cognitive impairment using lesion-symptom mapping: Design and multicenter pilot study. Alzheimers Dement. 11, 310–326 (2019).
Catani, M. & de Schotten, M. T. Atlas of Human Brain Connections (OUP, 2012).
Assaneo, M. F. et al. Spontaneous synchronization to speech reveals neural mechanisms facilitating language learning. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 627–632 (2019).
Zeestraten, E. A. et al. Sex differences in frontal lobe connectivity in adults with autism spectrum conditions. Transl. Psychiatry 7, e1090 (2017).
Lunven, M. et al. White matter lesional predictors of chronic visual neglect: a longitudinal study. Brain 138, 746–760 (2015).
Catani, M. et al. Symmetries in human brain language pathways correlate with verbal recall. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 17163–17168 (2007).
Axer, H., Klingner, C. M. & Prescher, A. Fiber anatomy of dorsal and ventral language streams. Brain Lang. 127, 192–204 (2013).
Gelman, A. & Hill, J. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models (Cambridge University Press, 2006).
Kruschke, J. K. & Liddell, T. M. Bayesian data analysis for newcomers. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 25, 155–177 (2018).
Bzdok, D., Nichols, T. E. & Smith, S. M. Towards algorithmic analytics for large-scale datasets. Nat. Mach. Intell. 1, 296–306 (2019).
Hoffman, M. D. et al. The No-U-Turn sampler: adaptively setting path lengths in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15, 1593–1623 (2014).
Kruschke, J. Doing Bayesian Data Analysis: A Tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan (Academic Press, 2014).
Salvatier, J., Wiecki, T. V. & Fonnesbeck, C. Probabilistic programming in Python using PyMC3. PeerJ Comput. Sci. 2, e55 (2016).
Abraham, A. et al. Machine learning for neuroimaging with scikit-learn. Front. Neuroinform. 8, 14 (2014).
Ito, K. L. & Liew, S.-L. Calculating the laterality index using FSL for stroke neuroimaging data. Gigascience 5, s13742–016 (2016).
Kiesow, H., Uddin, L. Q., Bernhardt, B. C., Kable, J. & Bzdok, D. Dissecting the midlife crisis: disentangling social, personality and demographic determinants in social brain anatomy. Commun. Biol. 4, 728 (2021).
Acknowledgements
We confirm that we have read the Journal’s position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this report is consistent with those guidelines. We gratefully acknowledge Angelina K. Kancheva and Gözdem Arikan for their help with performing the manual infarct segmentation, Jae-seol Park, and Eunbin Ko for their help in organizing the neuropsychological data, and Parashkev Nachev and Michel Thiebaut de Schotten for their valuable comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. This project has been made possible by the Brain Canada Foundation, through the Canada Brain Research Fund, with the financial support of Health Canada, National Institutes of Health (NIH R01 AG068563A), and the Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR 438531). DB was also supported by the Healthy Brains Healthy Lives initiative (Canada First Research Excellence fund), Google (Research Award), and by the CIFAR Artificial Intelligence Chairs program (Canada Institute for Advanced Research).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
D.B. designed the study, J.M.K. developed analytical tools and analyzed the data; D.B., J.M.K., and G.H. wrote the manuscript; J.-S.L., H.-J.B., K.-H.Y., G.S., A.B., and N.S.R. edited the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Communications Biology thanks Dirk den Ouden, Loic Labache, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary handling editor: Gene Chong.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kernbach, J.M., Hartwigsen, G., Lim, JS. et al. Bayesian stroke modeling details sex biases in the white matter substrates of aphasia. Commun Biol 6, 354 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-023-04733-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-023-04733-1
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.