Alzheimer’s disease (AD) associated proteins exist in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). This paper evidences that protein aggregate morphology distinctly differs in CSF of patients with AD dementia (ADD), mild cognitive impairment due to AD (MCI AD), with subjective cognitive decline without amyloid pathology (SCD) and with non-AD MCI using liquid-based atomic force microscopy (AFM). Spherical-shaped particles and nodular-shaped protofibrils were present in the CSF of SCD patients, whereas CSF of ADD patients abundantly contained elongated mature fibrils. Quantitative analysis of AFM topographs confirms fibril length is higher in CSF of ADD than in MCI AD and lowest in SCD and non-AD dementia patients. CSF fibril length is inversely correlated with CSF amyloid beta (Aβ) 42/40 ratio and CSF p-tau protein levels (obtained from biochemical assays) to predict amyloid and tau pathology with an accuracy of 94% and 82%, respectively, thus identifying ultralong protein fibrils in CSF as a possible signature of AD pathology.
CSF analytics is central in the diagnosis of neurodegenerative disorders including Parkinson’s disease (PD)1 and AD2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9. Chiefly, CSF reflects neuropathological changes upon interfacing with the extracellular brain regions, thus serving as a rich source for screening PD and AD biomarkers. Still, it has only been in the recent past that the quantification of Aβ42 and 40 and their ratio, total-tau (t-tau) and phosphorylated-tau (p-tau) protein levels in CSF using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) have become a cornerstone of the routine diagnostics of patients with cognitive complaints as they allow for an early and reliable diagnosis of AD pathology2,4,5,10,11. In particular, the Aβ42 to Aβ40 ratio is decreased early in the progression of AD and is inversely correlated with plaque formation found on Amyloid-PET3,12, while phosphorylated tau protein levels are increased in AD patients and reflect disease severity13,14. The advent of digital immunoassays further enabled the realisation of an accurate assessment of pathologic amyloid and p-tau isoforms also in blood plasma15,16,17. Especially, Aβ42, P-tau181, P-tau217, and P-tau231 levels in plasma were shown to be highly correlated with CSF- and PET AD biomarkers16,17,18,19. Alternative techniques such as immuno-infrared sensors were demonstrated to reliably detect the formation of β-sheet structures indicative of pathologic Aβ-oligomerization20. Analysis of the changes associated with the secondary Aβ structure allowed the detection of AD pathology with a high accuracy21 even in preclinical and prodromal AD patients already up to 17 years before clinical conversion to AD22,23. Regarding the tertiary structure of insoluble Aβ aggregates, in the past, fluorescence correlation spectroscopy was demonstrated to identify amyloid-beta aggregates in CSF24 but it has been shown that fluorophore labels can modify oligomer size distribution25. Cryo-electron microscopy is another powerful tool employed to capture the polymorphism in brain-derived amyloid fibrils26,27 but the sample preparation steps required for protein fibril analysis at cryogenic conditions could affect the fibril structure28,29.
Although crucial qualitative and quantitative information on protein aggregates can be obtained from the above-discussed methods, it is becoming increasingly important to characterise single protein aggregates in CSF in a label-free manner under physiological conditions.
In this context, AFM, infrared spectroscopy and Raman spectroscopy are promising preclinical techniques to examine in a label-free manner the nanoscale morphology30,31,32 and chemical signature33,34 of oligomers and fibrillar aggregates of proteins involved in the pathogenesis of AD in CSF30,31 and in blood35. Clearly, AFM operated at ambient conditions cannot provide atomic-scale details on protein aggregates on par with cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) but it offers a facile route to profile the full spectrum of pathological protein aggregates with single-particle specificty36,37,38,39 without the need for complex sample preparation. Knowledge on the differences in protein aggregate types in body fluids from small oligomers, and protofibrils to mature fibrils could augment current AD diagnostics and treatment decisions. For example, antibodies against Aβ that have been developed in the past years for the treatment of AD seem to target different protein aggregates of Aβ. In particular, the anti-amyloid antibody lecanemab, which mainly binds to soluble protofibrils (short fibrillar aggregates that appear with a distinct nodular morphology35,36,40) showed positive results on clinical endpoints in a large phase-III trial41. In contrast, previous phase III studies on anti-amyloid antibodies which mainly bind to mature amyloid fibrils (elongated with smooth surface topology) such as gantenerumab, crenezumab and aducanumab showed no (gantenerumab, crenezumab) or uncertain (aducanumab) effects on clinical endpoints42,43. Thus, the question of which kind of protein aggregates are most prevalent in body fluids such as the CSF of an individual patient could be of major importance for the selection of patients for clinical trials or treatment decisions.
Here, we used liquid-based AFM (see Fig.1a for the schematic of CSF extraction and deposition within the AFM liquid cell) to resolve and quantify differently sized single protein aggregates from oligomers, protofibrils to mature fibrils in CSF extracted from patients presenting with cognitive complaints. CSF of patients with only subjective cognitive decline (SCD, n = 7, age = 61.0 ± 8.9 years, MoCA score = 26.7 ± 1.5), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) without specified aetiology (n = 1, age = 60.8, MoCA score = 20), MCI due to AD (MCI AD, n = 10, age = 69.2 ± 11.0 years, MoCA score = 23.0 ± 3.5), patients with AD dementia (ADD, n = 11, age = 72.0 ± 12.7 years, MoCA score = 15.7 ± 6.3), Lewy Body dementia (LBD, n = 2, age = 74.0 ± 5.6 years, MoCA score = 10.0) as well a patient with vascular dementia (VDD, n = 1, age = 76.4 years, MoCA score = 25.0) were analysed using AFM. The individual patient details are presented in Table 1 and a group-wise summary is given in Supplementary Table S1. Our findings emphasise the importance of recording protein fibril morphology directly in CSF and their implications in better understanding the molecular pathogenesis of AD and identifying probable targets for therapeutic intervention are discussed. In the next sections, we describe the results from AFM based analysis of CSF from representative patients with advanced stage ADD (identification label: KSSG:38 and KSSG: 36), early onset, mild ADD (KSSG: 15), MCI AD (KSSG: 2) and SCD (KSSG: 19) and subsequently detail the results obtained from AFM analysis of CSF from patients with SCD.
Detection of ultralong protein fibrils in CSF of patients with severe AD
First, we studied CSF extracted from a patient with severe AD (identification label: KSSG:38). The details on CSF extraction, storage, and preparation of CSF samples on the gold surface for AFM imaging are provided in the materials and methods section. Patient KSSG:38 (90-year-old, male) was clinically diagnosed with severe AD and classified as A + T + N + (A, amyloid, T, tau, N, neurodegeneration) according to the NIA-AA research framework44. An overview of the clinical characteristics of all patients is provided in Table 1. Representative structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans demonstrating patients’ brain atrophy are provided for illustrative purposes. Figure 1b is a T2- weighted MRI scan in the coronary orientation of patient KSSG:38 showing severe global atrophy with a predominance of the temporal cortices and the hippocampus. Figure 1c is a large-area AFM phase-contrast image of long and close-packed protein fibrils resolved in CSF (air-dried on the gold surface) obtained from patient KSSG:38. The corresponding height map is provided in Supplementary Fig. S1. Figure 1d and e are the qualitative (colour-coded map) and quantitative (polar plot) analyses of the orientation distribution of the fibrils shown in Fig. 1c using fiberapp software45. Figure 1f is a phase-contrast AFM image recorded in CSF from the same patient KSSG:38 showing close-packed protein fibrils with varying orientations as shown in the colour-coded map (Fig. 1g) and polar plot with the distribution of orientation angles (Fig. 1h), calculated similarly to the orientation analysis in Fig. 1d and e. Figure 1i is a phase-contrast AFM image showing clearly the local arrangement of the fibrils within a sparse network. In particular, we observed that the fibrils in CSF from patient KSSG:38 were mainly organised either in parallel (colour-coded in green), spliced (colour coded in red) or in a t-junction format (colour-coded in blue) as shown in the colour-coded phase-contrast image (Fig. 1i). Such individual protein fibrils are arranged in a mostly non-overlapping manner as both close-packed and sparse structures were prevalently resolved on the gold surface during our AFM measurements as shown in Fig. 1c, f and i. Previously, a non-overlapping but close-packed arrangement of elongated fibrils has been mainly observed for in vitro prepared Aβ42 fibrils in buffer salt solutions using AFM and this observation was attributed to the surface-independent bidirectional growth model adopted by Aβ42 species37,46. Figure 1j, k are high-resolution AFM height and phase-contrast images of a single protein fibril in CSF from patient KSSG:38, respectively. The fibril structure appeared elongated and was devoid of any nodular feature characteristic seen in protofibrillar protein aggregates37,47. Overlaying the height with a phase-contrast image of the single protein fibril (Fig. 1l) did not show any signs of a fuzzy coat previously visualised in pathological human Tau fibrils using AFM48. Figure 1m is a spatially well-resolved AFM height map showing the full length of highly elongated protein fibrils in CSF from patient KSSG:38. Based on sectional analysis of nearly ~3000 individual protein fibrils resolved in CSF from patient KSSG:38 using AFM (representative images shown in Fig. 1c, f, i, j, m and Supplementary Figs. S1, S2 and S3), we calculate the mean fibril length to be (2.2 ± 0.75) μm and the mean fibril diameter (see Supplementary Fig. S2 for calculation of fibril diameter from measured height) to be (3.0 ± 0.4) nm. Conversely, only a small population of spherical particles with sizes ranging from ~0.5 to 4 nm were detected in CSF from patient KSSG:38 (Supplementary Fig. S3, panel b inset). The length and diameter of the fibrils measured in CSF from patient KSSG:38 are comparable with fibrils detected in CSF of other individuals (patient identification number: KSSG:36) classified as A + T + N + with severe AD dementia (see Supplementary Fig. S4 and S5). Although the length of fibrils in CSF of patient KSSG:38 is longer than the length of protein fibrils purified from AD brain tissue26, the fibril diameter measured directly in CSF is significantly lower than the fibril diameter of ~7–18 nm reported using cryo-electron microscopy26.
Resolving protein aggregates in CSF from patients at various stages of AD
Next, we investigated CSF from patients with early-onset, mild AD dementia (KSSG:15, classified as A + T + N + ), with MCI due to AD (KSSG:2, classified as A + T + N + ) and SCD with no signs of AD pathology or neurodegeneration (KSSG:19, classified as A-T-N-) using AFM. Figure 2a is a representative T1-weighted coronar MRI scan of patient KSSG:15 showing moderate bilateral hippocampal atrophy. AFM analysis (Fig. 2b–d) of CSF from patient KSSG:15 revealed the presence of fibrils on the gold surface with a mean length of (2.1 ± 0.35) μm and a mean diameter of (2.9 ± 1.1) nm. Stable population of fibrils were resolved in CSF from patient KSSG:15 with comparable size and morphology to fibrils detected in patients KSSG:38 and KSSG:36 all three patients were classified as A + T + N + . The size of the spherical aggregates detected in CSF from patient KSSG:15 ranged from ~2 to 20 nm. Additonal information on brain imaging and AFM analysis of CSF from patient KSSG:15 is provided in the Supplementary Fig. S6. Figure 2e is a representative T1-weighted coronar MRI brain scan of patient KSSG:2 with MCI due to AD showing moderate global atrophy with frontal and parietal predominance. Interestingly, the AFM images recorded on CSF from patient KSSG:2 (Fig. 2f, g) presented a completely different picture in terms of fibril morphology and the prevalent occurrence of spherical aggregates (size range: ~5–30 nm) compared to AFM analysis of CSF obtained from the patients with late-stage AD dementia (KSSG:38, 36) and early-onset AD dementia (KSSG:15) patients. Based on AFM topographs we calculated a mean fibril length of (0.5 ± 0.25) μm and from the sectional analysis (similar to that shown in Fig. 2h) we calculated a mean diameter of (3.1 ± 0.7) nm for fibrils, which were prevalently detected in CSF from patient KSSG:2. More detailed AFM analysis of fibrils in CSF from patient KSSG:2 is provided in the Supplementary Fig. S7. The size of the spherical aggregates detected in CSF from patient KSSG:2 varied from ~5 to 30 nm. In addition to short fibrils and spherical aggregates (Fig. 2f, g), we also observed thin films in CSF from patient KSSG:2 as shown in the spatially well-resolved AFM topograph (Fig. 2i). The variations in the thickness profile of the nanometer-sized thin films are provided in the Supplementary Fig. S8. Such nanometer-sized thin films classified as nanoplaques have also been reported in the CSF of individuals with AD49.
Characterisation of protofibrillar aggregates in CSF of patients with SCD
Figure 2j is a representative T1-weighted MRI brain scan of the patient with SCD (KSSG:19) showing no signs of atrophy. Analysis of CSF using AFM from the same patient exhibited the presence of mostly spherical aggregates as shown in the phase-contrast AFM image (Fig. 2k) together with short protofibrils. The size of the spherical aggregates in CSF from patient KSSG:19 ranged from ~10–80 nm, based on AFM height images (top inset Fig. 2k) and also see Supplementary Fig. S9. Notably, protofibrils were only scarcely detected in CSF from patient KSSG:19. Based on AFM topographs (Fig. 2l and m) and sectional profiles similar to those shown in the bottom inset Fig. 2m, we calculated a mean length of (0.3 ± 0.2) μm and a mean diameter of (2.7 ± 1.2) nm for fibrils resolved in CSF from patient KSSG:19. To assess whether the presence of ultralong protein fibrils is a general CSF feature or possibly specific to AD, we conducted additional AFM measurements on patients KSSG:19, 46, 57, 84, 97 and 129 who were all classified as SCD (A-T-N-). AFM measurements did not reveal any traces of ultralong protein fibrils in their respective CSF. Yet, AFM analysis of CSF from patients diagnosed with SCD (KSSG:19, 46, 57, 84, 97 and 129) confirmed that only CSF from patients KSSG: 19, 57, 84 and 129 contained protofibrillar aggregates (with nodular morphology) and were present together with spherical particles as shown in Fig. 3a (representative AFM analysis of CSF from patient KSSG:57).
Figure 3b is a high-resolution AFM topograph of a protofibrillar aggregate revealing the nodular morphology detected in CSF of patient KSSG: 57, which is in stark contrast to the morphology of mature fibril (detected in CSF of the patient: KSSG 38, severe AD) shown in Fig. 3c visualised with a smoother surface topology and appears elongated in comparison to protofibrils. The distribution of the protofibril length (Fig. 3d) and height (Fig. 3e) distribution in CSF of patients KSSG 19, 57, 84 and 129 confirms that protein aggregates with heterogeneous size and shape distribution are present in the CSF from SCD patients. Based on the box plot shown in Fig. 3d we calculate the mean length for protofibrils detected in patients KSSG 19, 57, 84 and 129 to be (0.3 ± 0.1) µm, n: 78, (0.4 ± 0.1) µm, n: 63, (0.34 ± 0.1) µm, n: 75 and, (0.35 ± 0.0.7) µm, n: 72, respectively. Likewise, the corresponding mean protofibril height was calculated based on the box plot shown in Fig. 3e for patients KSSG 19, 57, 84 and 129 to be (2.95 ± 0.8) nm, (2.3 ± 0.6) nm, (2.9 ± 0.3) nm and (1.85 ± 0.4) nm, respectively.
In addition to protofibrillar aggregates in the CSF of patients with SCD, the presence of spherical particles was also detected during the AFM measurements (see Supplementary Fig. S10 for detailed AFM analysis of CSF from SCD patients). The spherical particles resolved in CSF from patients could also contain protein oligomers, which occur along with protofibrils and mature fibrils that appear as transient aggregates along the assembly pathway of pathological proteins24,50,51,52,53, as depicted in the schematic Fig. 3f. Oligomeric aggregates of varying size distributions, have been reported previously in CSF of healthy individuals54 and those with AD pathology4,24,31,51,54. Such protein aggregates represent toxic soluble amyloid-oligomers which could drive neurodegeneration55. Based on the box plot shown in Fig. 3g we calculated a mean particle size for all spherical aggregates (n: 120 particles for each patient) detected in CSF of patients KSSG 19, 57, 84, 129, 46 and 95 to be (44.5 ± 13.5) nm, (2.8 ± 0.8) nm, (2.5 ± 0.75) nm, (3.8 ± 1.6) nm, (66.6 ± 17.5) nm and (51.8 ± 13.0) nm, respectively.
Correlating nanoscale imaging data with the clinical diagnosis of the patients
Differences in protein aggregate morphology recorded in CSF using AFM and the clinical evaluation all patients enroled in this study are detailed in Table 1 and summarized in Supplementary Table S1. Upon comparing the summarized quantitative AFM measurements on fibril length with the clinical evaluation in a patient-specific manner we found that protein fibril length in CSF was inversely correlated with the CSF Aβ42/40 ratio (r = −0.6, t(31) = −4.4, p < 0.001, see Fig. 4a) and positively correlated with CSF p-tau values (r = 0.4, t(31) = 2.8, p < 0.01, see Fig. 4b). A fibril length cut-off of ≥0.625 µm determined by the highest Youden-Index could predict the CSF amyloid status of patients with an accuracy of 94% (sensitivity = 0.95, specificity = 0.92, see Fig. 4c) while a cut-off of ≥1.15 µm predicted tau pathology with 82% accuracy (sensitivity = 0.82, specificity = 0.81, see Fig. 4d). The individual mean fibril length in CSF significantly differed between disease groups (one-way ANOVA, F(4) = 48.121, p < 0.001, see Fig. 5a). Fibril length was highest in ADD patients (2.1 ± 0.2 µm, see Supplementary Table S1) which were significantly higher than in patients with MCI AD (1.1 ± 0.4 µm, pHolm-adj < 0.001) and SCD (0.2 ± 0.2 µm, pHolm-adj < 0.001). The difference in fibril length between the MCI AD and SCD groups was also significant (pHolm-adj < 0.001). In a linear regression model of fibril length in which age, the disease group and the interaction between age and disease group were the predictors, only the disease group (F = 5.8, p = 0.009) and the age disease interaction (F = 3.5, p = 0.047) were significant predictors of CSF fibril length, but not the main effect of age (F = 0.9, p = 0.343). Simple slope analyses of this linear regression model revealed that age was only significantly correlated with fibril length in patients with MCI AD (t = 3.0, p = 0.01, see Fig. 5b) but not in patients with SCD (t = −0.9, p = 0.36) or ADD (t = 0.5, p = 0.65).
In this study, we demonstrate that liquid-based AFM is well suited to morphologically discern between individual protein aggregates in CSF. Protein fibrils were resolved in CSF and their morphology quantified at a single-fibril level. The ability to clearly quantify protein fibril length and diameter in CSF at physiological conditions validates the usefulness of AFM for monitoring AD onset and progression. Especially, in light of evidence that CSF analysis can be used to detect cerebral Aβ accumulation earlier than PET scans56 motivates the need for complementary techniques such as AFM to directly examine the CSF composition. Protein aggregate size, shape profile and structure varied between patients with SCD, MCI AD and ADD. CSF fibril length was observed to be increased in patients with MCI AD and highest in patients with ADD as compared to patients with SCD and non-AD dementia. A surprising result was the presence of a stable and abundant population of micrometre length-sized fibrils detected in CSF from several patients with ADD. These ultralong protein fibrils showed a distinct morphology (diameter: ~3.0 nm, length: few microns) and spatial organisation (the fibrils were closely packed in a mostly non-overlapping format) that was nearly identical across thousands of measured single fibrils. Based on our data and previous reports on the morphology of purified Aβ4040, Aβ4237,46 and tau48 protein fibrils we posit that the observed ultralong protein fibrils detected in CSF from patients with ADD could be attributed to Aβ protein isoform. Although oligomeric and small protofibrillar aggregates have been previously resolved in CSF from MCI and AD patients using AFM30,31, the new insights gained from our work for the presence of ultralong fibrils in CSF of ADD patients could trigger further discussion on amyloid clearance mechanisms. Furthermore, the observed increase in fibril length with age in the group of MCI AD patients could indicate a link between fibril growth and AD disease progression. However, fibril length did not change with age in the group with only SCD and manifest ADD suggesting that it is mainly determined by AD pathology and has reached a plateau in patients with manifest dementia. Next, comparing the quantitative morphological data of fibrils in CSF obtained from AFM with biochemical assay based analysis of Aβ and tau protein isoforms in CSF revealed that fibril length parameter was highly correlated with the CSF Aβ42/40 ratio and to a lesser degree with p-tau 181 and predicted amyloid, and to a lesser degree for p-tau pathology, with high accuracy.
Our study has limitations. While we demonstrate the morphological characterisation of protein fibrils in CSF, details on the molecular composition of the fibrillar aggregates detected in CSF remain to be clarified. The chemical nature of the fibrils can be obtained by combing AFM with fluorescence microscopy, which requires the usage of specific fluorophores that can selectively bind to either Aβ or tau protein isoforms in CSF. An alternative strategy to chemically identify protein aggregates in CSF could be to integrate AFM with Raman/IR spectroscopy and then to compare the morphology and spectrochemical signature of the protein aggregates in CSF (unlabelled data) with synthetically purified and prepared amyloid and tau isoforms (labelled data) deposited on a solid substrate. The labelled datasets can then be used as a training layer in a convolutional neural network scheme to classify the unlabelled datasets into either Aβ or tau protein isoforms. In addition to the above-outlined experimental approaches, future efforts will also require larger sample sizes in order to determine whether fibril formation in CSF can also be found in other neurodegenerative diseases or is only specific to AD. We anticipate that a longitudinal follow-up of the patient could further validate whether CSF fibril length can be an indicator for predicting future cognitive decline in patients with MCI AD.
Materials and methods
In total, 238 patients who presented for an initial or follow-up assessment of cognitive complaints at the memory clinic of the Department of Neurology at the Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen were enroled in a pilot study on AFM imaging of blood and CSF in neurodegenerative diseases. For the presented analyses, we initially selected nine patients with either AD dementia (n = 3), mild cognitive impairment due to AD (n = 1) and patients with only subjective cognitive decline without amyloid pathology (SCD, n = 5) from the well-characterized cohort described in our previous publication35. The nine patients were selected as they span the AD continuum from patients with only subjective cognitive complaints without biomarker evidence for amyloid-, tau-pathology or neurodegeneration (A-T-N-) to severe dementia due to AD (A + T + N + ) according to the NIA-AA research framework44. In a second step, an additional 24 patients were randomly selected from the overall cohort by P.N.N with the clinical information unbeknownst to them, resulting in an analysed total cohort of 33 patients. All participants gave informed consent to participate in the pilot study. When there were doubts concerning patient’s ability to give informed consent, we additionally obtained the informed consent of the relative accompanying the patient. The experimental procedures were approved by the ethics committee of East Switzerland (Number: 202000558) and were performed following the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients received a comprehensive diagnostic workup comprising a neurological and neuropsychological examination, structural MRI imaging and CSF analyses. LUMIPULSE G assays (Fujirebio, Tokyo, Japan) were used to measure hTau Ag, pTau 181, β-amyloid 1–42, β-amyloid 1–40 and the corresponding Aβ 1–42/Aβ 1–40 ratio. Standard laboratory cutoffs were used to define a positive amyloid status (CSF-β-Amyloid 1–42/1–40 ratio < 0.068) and tau status (pCSF p-tau >59 ng/l), whereas atrophy in structural MRI imaging, hypometabolism in FDG-PET imaging or elevated total tau levels (>410 ng/l) were regarded as evidence of neurodegeneration. Clinical diagnoses were reached in an interdisciplinary consensus. Overall, seven patients presented with solely subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and one patient had mild cognitive impairment of unspecified aetiology. Ten were diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment due to AD (MCI AD) and eleven patients with probable AD dementia with biomarker evidence (ADD) according to the NIA-AA criteria of 201157. One patient was diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease dementia (PDD), two with Lewy Body dementia (LBD)58 and one patient with dementia due to vascular disease (VDD)59 according to the respective diagnostic criteria.
Preparation of CSF samples for AFM analysis
Directly after the lumbar puncture, CSF samples were stored at −80 °C at the laboratory, Zentrum für Labormedizin St. Gallen. Following the CSF retrieval, the samples were thawed under standard laboratory conditions to a liquified state before deposition on gold thin films. The gold thin films (~100 nm of Au (111) on mica substrate) were commercially purchased from Phasis, Inc. Before deposition of CSF, the as-received gold substrates were thoroughly cleaned (acetone rinsing followed isopropyl alcohol rinsing and blow drying with N2). Only atomically flat samples (verified using scanning tunnelling microscope, Pt/Ir tip, E-scanner, constant current mode, multimode-Bruker 8) with an overall surface roughness was ≤0.5 nm over an area of 5 µm2 (verified using AFM, tapping mode, multimode-Bruker 8) were used for CSF deposition. Gold thin films with surface defects60 were also observed in some of gold samples as-received from Phasis Inc and such samples were excluded from usage for protein imaging experiments.
AFM measurements were conducted in tapping mode using a multimode 8 Bruker instrument equipped with an E-scanner. For the AFM tip, a SCOUT 150 HAR silicon AFM tips with a high aspect ratio was used in tapping mode (gold reflective backside coating, force constant 2 N/m, resonant frequency: 150 kHz, NuNano). Before inserting the AFM tip in the holder, the AFM tip was cleaned by rinsing in acetone for 30 s followed by rinsing in isopropyl alcohol for ~1 min followed by blow-drying with compressed air. AFM measurements were conducted directly in the CSF medium (without air-drying process) by injecting ~10 µL of CSF into the closed type liquid-cell holder placed over the gold substrate. For the AFM measurements at the liquid-solid interface, the AFM tip and cantilever were immersed in CSF and the resonant frequency of the tip was reduced by ~30%, due to the damping of cantilever dynamics. AFM measurements were also conducted on air-dried samples by first depositing ~10 µL of CSF on the clean gold thin films followed by drying in the air (~2 h) and then placing the air-dried CSF on gold disks on top of the E-scanner for AFM imaging. No differences in fibril length or prevalence were detected for CSF samples that were air-dried and when the same CSF was analysed under hydrated conditions. In particular, we monitored the shrinking factor by directly comparing the fibril height measured in the CSF medium retained in a hydrated condition and the same CSF samples analysed upon air drying. From such comparative analysis, we derived a shrinking factor of 0.8 ± 0.1. The AFM images were analysed using Nanoscope software (Bruker), subjected to flattening for extraction of surface roughness values of gold thin films, and height and length analysis of the protein fibrils. The orientation map of ultralong fibrils in CSF shown in Fig. 1d, e, g and h was analysed using Fiberapp, open-source software45.
Statistics and reproducibility
Statistical analyses were performed in the R environment for statistical computing (version 4.2.0, R Core Team (Vienna, Austria; 2018), R Project for Statistical Computing). To compare the clinical characteristic between disease groups exploratory analyses of variance (ANOVA) tests for numerical data and chi-square tests for categorical data were conducted as implemented in the ‘arsenal’ package61 (see Supplementary Table S1). Inferential statistics were performed for the main AFM measure individual mean CSF fibril length as fibrils were the most prevalent protein aggregate species in our patients. Of note, no fibrils were detected in three patients (KSSG: 46—SCD, KSSG: 66—VDD, and KSSG- 97—SCD, see Table 1). We based the fibril length as zero for these patients. Simple regression analyses between the dependent variable CSF fibril length and the CSF Aβ 42/40 ratio, respectively the p-tau levels were performed and plotted using the ‘ggstatsplot’ package62. Moreover, pairwise disease group comparisons were performed with Games-Howell tests with Holm-Bonferroni adjustments applied for multiple testing. Moreover, we determined the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of CSF fibril length as a predictor of CSF amyloid status as determined by the Aβ 42/40 ratio and the CSF p-tau status by calculating receiver operating characteristics (ROC) for cutpoints which yielded the highest Youden-index (sensitivity + specificity -1) using the ‘cutpointr’ package63. A linear regression model of CSF fibrillar length with the predictors’ age, disease and the age x disease interaction was fitted and the model estimate was tested with an ANOVA. Simple age regression slopes were analysed for each disease group using the ‘interaction’ package.
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. Additional data related to this paper may be requested from the authors. The source data for the statistical plots shown in Figs. 3, 4 and 5 are also provided as Supplementary Data 1 file.
Parnetti, L. et al. CSF and blood biomarkers for Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 18, 573–586 (2019).
Hansson, O. Biomarkers for neurodegenerative diseases. Nat. Med. 27, 954–963 (2021).
Palmqvist, S., Mattsson, N., Hansson, O. & Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging, I. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis detects cerebral amyloid-β accumulation earlier than positron emission tomography. Brain 139, 1226–1236 (2016).
Blennow, K., Hampel, H., Weiner, M. & Zetterberg, H. Cerebrospinal fluid and plasma biomarkers in Alzheimer disease. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 6, 131–144 (2010).
Andreasen, N. et al. Cerebrospinal fluid β-Amyloid(1-42) in Alzheimer disease: differences between early- and late-onset Alzheimer disease and stability during the course of disease. Arch. Neurol. 56, 673–680 (1999).
Anoop, A., Singh, P. K., Jacob, R. S. & Maji, S. K. CSF biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis. Int J. Alzheimers Dis. 2010, 606802 (2010).
Grant, M. K. O. et al. Human cerebrospinal fluid 6E10-immunoreactive protein species contain amyloid precursor protein fragments. PLoS One 14, e0212815 (2019).
Bader, J. M. et al. Proteome profiling in cerebrospinal fluid reveals novel biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Syst. Biol. 16, e9356 (2020).
Andreasen, N. et al. Evaluation of CSF-tau and CSF-Abeta42 as diagnostic markers for Alzheimer disease in clinical practice. Arch. Neurol. 58, 373–379 (2001).
Lee, J. C., Kim, S. J., Hong, S. & Kim, Y. Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease utilizing amyloid and tau as fluid biomarkers. Exp. Mol. Med. 51, 1–10 (2019).
Janelidze, S. et al. Concordance between different amyloid immunoassays and visual amyloid positron emission tomographic assessment. JAMA Neurol. 74, 1492 (2017).
Doecke, J. D. et al. Total Aβ(42)/Aβ(40) ratio in plasma predicts amyloid-PET status, independent of clinical AD diagnosis. Neurology 94, e1580–e1591 (2020).
Wattmo, C., Blennow, K. & Hansson, O. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarker levels as markers for nursing home placement and survival time in Alzheimer’s disease. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 18, 573–584 (2021).
Wattmo, C., Blennow, K. & Hansson, O. Cerebro-spinal fluid biomarker levels: phosphorylated tau (T) and total tau (N) as markers for rate of progression in Alzheimer’s disease. BMC Neurol. 20, 10 (2020).
Bayoumy, S. et al. Clinical and analytical comparison of six Simoa assays for plasma P-tau isoforms P-tau181, P-tau217, and P-tau231. Alzheimer’s Res. Ther. 13, 198 (2021).
Nakamura, A. et al. High performance plasma amyloid-β biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease. Nature 554, 249–254 (2018).
Verberk, I. M. W. et al. Plasma amyloid as prescreener for the earliest Alzheimer pathological changes. Ann. Neurol. 84, 648–658 (2018).
Karikari, T. K. et al. Blood phosphorylated tau 181 as a biomarker for Alzheimer’s disease: a diagnostic performance and prediction modelling study using data from four prospective cohorts. Lancet Neurol. 19, 422–433 (2020).
Lantero Rodriguez, J. et al. Plasma p-tau181 accurately predicts Alzheimer’s disease pathology at least 8 years prior to post-mortem and improves the clinical characterisation of cognitive decline. Acta Neuropathol. 140, 267–278 (2020).
Nabers, A. et al. Amyloid-β-secondary structure distribution in cerebrospinal fluid and blood measured by an immuno-infrared-sensor: a biomarker candidate for Alzheimer’s disease. Anal. Chem. 88, 2755–2762 (2016).
Nabers, A. et al. Amyloid blood biomarker detects Alzheimer’s disease. EMBO Mol. Med. 10, e8763 (2018).
Möllers, T. et al. Aβ misfolding in blood plasma measured by immuno‐infrared‐sensor as an age‐independent risk marker of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Dement. Diagnosis (Amst) 13, 1–10 (2021).
Stockmann, J. et al. Amyloid-β misfolding as a plasma biomarker indicates risk for future clinical Alzheimer’s disease in individuals with subjective cognitive decline. Alzheimer’s Res. Ther. 12, 169 (2020).
Pitschke, M., Prior, R., Haupt, M. & Riesner, D. Detection of single amyloid β-protein aggregates in the cerebrospinal fluid of Alzheimer’s patients by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Nat. Med. 4, 832–834 (1998).
Wägele, J., De Sio, S., Voigt, B., Balbach, J. & Ott, M. How fluorescent tags modify oligomer size distributions of the Alzheimer peptide. Biophys. J. 116, 227–238 (2019).
Kollmer, M. et al. Cryo-EM structure and polymorphism of Aβ amyloid fibrils purified from Alzheimer’s brain tissue. Nat. Commun. 10, 4760 (2019).
Ghosh, U., Thurber, K. R., Yau, W.-M. & Tycko, R. Molecular structure of a prevalent amyloid-β fibril polymorph from Alzheimer’s disease brain tissue. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2023089118 (2021).
Zielinski, M., Röder, C. & Schröder, G. F. Challenges in sample preparation and structure determination of amyloids by cryo-EM. J. Biol. Chem. 297, 100938 (2021).
Weissenberger, G., Henderikx, R. J. M. & Peters, P. J. Understanding the invisible hands of sample preparation for cryo-EM. Nat. Methods 18, 463–471 (2021).
Yue, T. et al. Computational integration of nanoscale physical biomarkers and cognitive assessments for Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis and prognosis. Sci. Adv. 3, e1700669 (2017).
De, S. et al. Soluble aggregates present in cerebrospinal fluid change in size and mechanism of toxicity during Alzheimer’s disease progression. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 7, 120 (2019).
Lobanova, E. et al. Imaging protein aggregates in the serum and cerebrospinal fluid in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 145, 632–643 (2022).
Ryzhikova, E. et al. Raman spectroscopy and machine learning for biomedical applications: Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis based on the analysis of cerebrospinal fluid. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 248, 119188 (2021).
Ruggeri, F. S. et al. Infrared nanospectroscopy reveals the molecular interaction fingerprint of an aggregation inhibitor with single Aβ42 oligomers. Nat. Commun. 12, 688 (2021).
Nirmalraj, P. N., Schneider, T. & Felbecker, A. Spatial organization of protein aggregates on red blood cells as physical biomarkers of Alzheimers disease pathology. Sci. Adv. 7, eabj2137 (2021).
Synhaivska, O., Bhattacharya, S., Campioni, S., Thompson, D. & Nirmalraj, P. N. Single-particle resolution of copper-associated annular α-synuclein oligomers reveals potential therapeutic targets of neurodegeneration. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 13, 1410–1421 (2022).
Nirmalraj, P. N. et al. Complete aggregation pathway of amyloid β (1-40) and (1-42) resolved on an atomically clean interface. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz6014 (2020).
Mastrangelo, I. A. et al. High-resolution atomic force microscopy of soluble Aβ42 oligomers. J. Mol. Biol. 358, 106–119 (2006).
Tinker-Mill, C., Mayes, J., Allsop, D. & Kolosov, O. V. Ultrasonic force microscopy for nanomechanical characterization of early and late-stage amyloid-β peptide aggregation. Sci. Rep. 4, 4004 (2014).
Bitan, G. et al. Amyloid β-protein (Aβ) assembly: Aβ40 and Aβ42 oligomerize through distinct pathways. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 100, 330–335 (2003).
van Dyck, C.H. et al. Lecanemab in early Alzheimer’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 388, 9–21 (2022).
Budd Haeberlein, S. et al. Two randomized phase 3 studies of aducanumab in early Alzheimer’s disease. J. Prev. Alzheimer’s Dis. 9, 197–210 (2022).
Ostrowitzki, S. et al. Evaluating the safety and efficacy of crenezumab vs placebo in adults with early Alzheimer disease: two phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled trials. JAMA Neurol. 79, 1113–1121 (2022).
Jack, C. R. Jr. et al. NIA-AA research framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Dement. J. Alzheimer’s Assoc. 14, 535–562 (2018).
Usov, I. & Mezzenga, R. FiberApp: an open-source software for tracking and analyzing polymers, filaments, biomacromolecules, and fibrous objects. Macromolecules 48, 1269–1280 (2015).
Watanabe-Nakayama, T. et al. High-speed atomic force microscopy reveals structural dynamics of amyloid β (1–42) aggregates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 5835–5840 (2016).
Ruggeri, F. S., Šneideris, T., Vendruscolo, M. & Knowles, T. P. J. Atomic force microscopy for single molecule characterisation of protein aggregation. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 664, 134–148 (2019).
Wegmann, S., Medalsy, I. D., Mandelkow, E. & Müller, D. J. The fuzzy coat of pathological human Tau fibrils is a two-layered polyelectrolyte brush. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, E313 (2013).
Aksnes, M. et al. Comparison of cerebrospinal fluid amyloidogenic nanoplaques with core biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease. Front. Aging Neurosci. 12, 1–11 (2021).
Lindgren, M., Sörgjerd, K. & Hammarström, P. Detection and characterization of aggregates, prefibrillar amyloidogenic oligomers, and protofibrils using gluorescence spectroscopy. Biophys. J. 88, 4200–4212 (2005).
Schuster, J. & Funke, S. A. Methods for the specific detection and quantitation of amyloid-β oligomers in cerebrospinal fluid. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 53, 53–67 (2016).
Horrocks, M. H. et al. Single-molecule imaging of individual amyloid protein aggregates in human biofluids. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 7, 399–406 (2016).
Fukumoto, H. et al. High-molecular-weight β-amyloid oligomers are elevated in cerebrospinal fluid of Alzheimer patients. FASEB J. 24, 2716–2726 (2010).
Hölttä, M. et al. Evaluating amyloid-β oligomers in cerebrospinal fluid as a biomarker for Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS One 8, e66381–e66381 (2013).
Benilova, I., Karran, E. & De Strooper, B. The toxic Aβ oligomer and Alzheimer’s disease: an emperor in need of clothes. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 349–357 (2012).
Palmqvist, S., Mattsson, N. & Hansson, O. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis detects cerebral amyloid-β accumulation earlier than positron emission tomography. Brain 139, 1226–1236 (2016).
McKhann, G. M. et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Dement. J. Alzheimer’s Assoc. 7, 263–269 (2011).
McKeith, I. G. et al. Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies: third report of the DLB Consortium. Neurology 65, 1863–1872 (2005).
Sachdev, P. et al. Diagnostic criteria for vascular cognitive disorders. Alzheimer Dis. Assoc. Disord. 28, 206–218 (2014).
Nirmalraj, P. N., Schmid, H., Gotsmann, B. & Riel, H. Nanoscale origin of defects at metal/molecule engineered interfaces. Langmuir 29, 1340–1345 (2013).
Heinzen, E., Sinnwell, J., Atkinson, E., Gunderson, T. & Dougherty, G. Family Functions for Modelsum. https://mayoverse.github.io/arsenal/reference/modelsum.family.html (2021).
Patil, I. Visualizations with statistical details: the ‘ggstatsplot’ approach. J. Open Source Softw. 6, 3167 (2021).
Thiele, C. & Hirschfeld, G. cutpointr: Improved estimation and validation of optimal cutpoints in R. J. Stat. Softw. 98, 1–27 (2021).
T.S. and A.F. thank Gianina Toller, Anna Müller, Matus Velicky, Benedikt Wagner and Kevin Graf for their support in the clinical care of patients, data collection and blood smear preparation. The authors thank Justus Bürgi for handling and storage of CSF materials. This research work was financially supported by Empa-KSSG research grant (number: 21/11).
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information
This manuscript has been previously reviewed at another Nature Portfolio journal. Communications Biology thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Gene Chong. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Nirmalraj, P.N., Schneider, T., Lüder, L. et al. Protein fibril length in cerebrospinal fluid is increased in Alzheimer’s disease. Commun Biol 6, 251 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-023-04606-7
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.