Structural features of Dnase1L3 responsible for serum antigen clearance

McCord, Jon J.; Engavale, Minal; Masoumzadeh, Elahe; Villarreal, Johanna; Mapp, Britney; Latham, Michael P.; Keyel, Peter A.; Sutton, R. Bryan

doi:10.1038/s42003-022-03755-5

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 16 August 2022

Structural features of Dnase1L3 responsible for serum antigen clearance

Communications Biology volume 5, Article number: 825 (2022) Cite this article

3732 Accesses
5 Citations
4 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

Autoimmunity develops when extracellular DNA released from dying cells is not cleared from serum. While serum DNA is primarily digested by Dnase1 and Dnase1L3, Dnase1 cannot rescue autoimmunity arising from Dnase1L3 deficiencies. Dnase1L3 uniquely degrades antigenic forms of cell-free DNA, including DNA complexed with lipids and proteins. The distinct activity of Dnase1L3 relies on its unique C-terminal Domain (CTD), but the mechanism is unknown. We used multiple biophysical techniques and functional assays to study the interplay between the core catalytic domain and the CTD. While the core domain resembles Dnase1, there are key structural differences between the two enzymes. First, Dnase1L3 is not inhibited by actin due to multiple differences in the actin recognition site. Second, the CTD augments the ability of the core to bind DNA, thereby facilitating the degradation of complexed DNA. Together, these structural insights will inform the development of Dnase1L3-based therapies for autoimmunity.

Cyclical palmitoylation regulates TLR9 signalling and systemic autoimmunity in mice

Article Open access 02 January 2024

Structural basis of human TREX1 DNA degradation and autoimmune disease

Article Open access 25 July 2022

UNC93B1 recruits syntenin-1 to dampen TLR7 signalling and prevent autoimmunity

Article 23 September 2019

Introduction

Production of antibodies targeting cell-free nucleic acids can lead to the development of severe autoimmune disorders, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)¹, hypocomplementemia urticarial vasculitis syndrome (HUVS)², and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)³. The enzymes responsible for clearing antigenic DNA from serum have been identified as Dnase1 and Dnase1L3 (deoxyribonuclease 1 like 3 or Dnaseγ)^4,5; yet, the activities assigned to these two enzymes are not synonymous. For example, mutations in Dnase1L3 have been linked to multiple autoimmune diseases^2,6,7,8, while Dnase1 is unable to rescue these autoimmune phenotypes^6,7. Therefore, Dnase1L3 accounts for a broader range of nucleic acid degradative activities.

Based on the overall sequence conservation between the two enzymes, the catalytic activities of Dnase1 and Dnase1L3 should be similar. Dnase1 and Dnase1L3 are both Ca²⁺/Mg²⁺-dependent endonucleases with a high degree of identity in the active site; however, the catalytic mechanism of the Dnase1-family remains contested⁹. Currently, there are two leading models for Dnase1 family catalysis, the single cation carboxylic acid model¹⁰ and double divalent cation model¹¹. The principal differences between the proposed mechanisms are the number of divalent cations involved in catalysis, and the residues that directly participate in acid/base catalysis. The more recent single cation carboxylic acid model posits a single divalent cation and Asp-189 as the catalytic base^10,12. In contrast, the more established double divalent cation model¹³ predicts two cations and implicates His-155 as the catalytic acid and His-274 as the catalytic base¹¹; however, neither model is completely supported by experimental data.

While the catalytic mechanism may be similar, there are multiple functional differences between Dnase1 and Dnase1L3. Dnase1 is inhibited by actin, while Dnase1L3 is not¹⁴. Furthermore, Dnase1L3 degrades DNA complexed with proteins and lipids, including immune complexes, more efficiently than Dnase1^6,8,15,16. This unique Dnase1L3 activity is hypothesized to originate from its positively charged C-terminal domain (CTD) that extends from Ser-283 to Ser-305⁶. Previous homology modeling, including models generated by AlphaFold¹⁷, predicts that the CTD forms a rigid α-helix, albeit with low confidence, which projects out from the core enzyme. It has been suggested that the C-terminal α-helix facilitates membrane binding, penetration or could potentially displace bound histones that occlude substrate DNA⁶.

Here we investigated the structure of the Dnase1L3 core domain using X-ray crystallography and the isolated CTD using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. The two domains were combined using Small-Angle X-ray Scattering (SAXS). Our high-resolution crystal structure of Dnase1L3 provides the first experimental support for the two-cation catalytic mechanism, wherein His-155 and His-274 act as the catalytic acid and base residues, respectively. The functional effects of the CTD were studied using enzymatic assays, co-sedimentation, and fluorescence polarization. We tie these functional assays to structural features of the CTD with circular dichroism and molecular dynamics to present a model of Dnase1L3’s diverse DNA degradation capacity and the function of the intrinsically disordered CTD. Our results support a DNA binding role for the CTD that confers increased avidity to heterogeneous DNA.

Results

MBP fusion enables prokaryotic expression of active Dnase1L3

Dnase1 and Dnase1L3 are nonspecific endonucleases that induce chromosomal DNA laddering. The DNA digesting activity of Dnases complicated previous attempts to overproduce the enzyme using prokaryotic expression systems¹⁸; however, the expression of inactive Dnase1 mutants has been successful¹⁹. To produce active Dnase1L3 in bacteria, we expressed the enzyme as a His₆-Maltose Binding Protein (MBP)-Dnase1L3 fusion protein. The fusion protein approach facilitates the purification of active enzyme as the Dnase1L3 fusion is inactive prior to tobacco etch virus (TEV) protease cleavage of MBP from Dnase1L3 (Fig. S1a). Prokaryotic expression offers a higher yield and a more straightforward workflow compared to the current eukaryotic expression protocols²⁰.

Structure of the core enzyme of Dnase1L3

Full-length Dnase1L3 was refractory to crystallization, likely because of the flexible C-terminus; therefore, we expressed and purified a form of Dnase1L3 missing the last 23 residues (ΔCTD) for the structural analysis of the core domain. Dnase1L3 ΔCTD was crystallized at pH 8.5 in 250 mM MgCl₂ in the P1 triclinic space group with four Dnase1L3 ΔCTD molecules in the asymmetric unit. The core Dnase1L3 enzyme was refined to a final resolution of 2.2 Å with an R-free of 23% (Table 1). The crystal structure of Dnase1L3 exhibits the classic 4-layer α-β sandwich architecture similar to other members of the exo/endo phosphatase (EEP) family of enzymes. The Dnase1L3 core enzyme structure superimposes with human Dnase1¹⁰ with an RMSD of 1.8 Å across all C-α atoms (Fig. S2a). Post-translationally Dnase1 possesses two N-linked glycosylation modifications that are implicated in Dnase1 stabilization and wild-type nuclease activity²¹; however, the N-linked glycosylation sites at Asn-18 and Asn-106 on Dnase1 correspond to Asp residues (Asp-38 and Asp-126) in human Dnase1L3 (Fig. S2b, c).

Table 1 Crystallographic data and refinement summary.

Full size table

Multifactorial actin resistance of Dnase1L3

Dnase1 activity is inhibited by G-actin, DNA-actin complexes, and DNA in aggregates with other poly-cations²². Consequently, native Dnase1 as a therapy for cystic fibrosis (CF) pulmonary sputum fluidization is limited. Dnase1 was reengineered as Pulmozyme^® to minimize actin inhibition, but there remains a weak inhibition of Dnase1 by large DNA/actin complexes in CF patient sputum²³. Dnase1L3 is natively resistant to actin inhibition¹⁴, making this enzyme a valuable potential therapeutic. We compared Dnase1L3 with the Dnase1-actin crystal structure²⁴ to elucidate the differences in the actin-binding interface. There are four notable differences between the two enzyme interfaces that directly impact actin binding. First, the ’central hydrophobic’ region that Dnase1 utilizes for actin binding is sterically disrupted in Dnase1L3²⁵. Dnase1 actin resistance was experimentally conferred by mutating Ala-114 within the ’central hydrophobic region’ to a bulky residue such as Arg, Glu, Met, Tyr, or Phe²². In Dnase1L3, the homologous residue to Ala-114 is Phe-131, which contributes to its native actin resistance (Fig. 1a). Second, a two amino acid insertion in the loop (residues 75-85 in Dnase1L3) following the actin-binding α-helix creates a more flexible loop in Dnase1L3, with an inverted net charge, relative to Dnase1 (residues 55–63), from a pI of 3.45 in the actin-inhibited Dnase1 structures²⁴ to pI of 11.15 in the actin-resistant Dnase1L3 (Fig. 1b). The charge inversion in the homologous actin-associated loop likely repels the similarly charged actin from productively binding to Dnase1L3. Third, an important salt bridge forming residue for Dnase1-actin binding is Glu-69 in Dnase1, which associates with Lys-61 from actin²⁴. In Dnase1L3, Glu-69 is analogous to Ser-91, which has less potential for a salt-bridge to actin (Fig. S3). Finally, the actin-binding α-helix (residues 67–75) is ’out-of-register’ in our crystal structure of Dnase1L3 relative to the homologous α-helix in Dnase1 (Fig. 1c). It is possible that this ’out-of-register’ shift disrupts a critical actin binding salt bridge at Glu-73.

**Fig. 1: Dnase1L3 inhibits actin binding.**

The patient mutation R206C disrupts a critical salt-bridge network

The best characterized pathogenic mutation in Dnase1L3 is the hypofunctional R206C that reduces enzyme activity and protein secretion^26,27. Using our crystal structure as a starting point, we performed 500 ns molecular dynamics simulations in explicit solvent equilibrated in the presence of 150 mM MgCl₂ on Chain C of Dnase1L3 ΔCTD computationally mutated to R206C. In addition to the previously predicted Glu-170 to Arg-206 salt bridge²⁸, our structural analysis shows that Arg-206 forms an extensive salt-bridged network with Asp-166 and Glu-167. The crystal structure shows well-ordered electron density for the Arg-206 residue, as well as the salt-bridged Asp-166 residue (Fig. 2a). Glu-167 and Glu-170 are likely transiently salt-bridged with Arg-206 because their electron density is not well-defined. The R206C mutation eliminates the salt-bridge network (Fig. S4) (Supplementary Data 1 and 2). We attempted to express and purify the R206C mutant, but the mutant proved unstable when cleaved from MBP using TEV protease. The fusion protein, Dnase1L3-MBP, was used instead to quantitate the protein misfolding via ANS (8-anilino-1-naphthalenesulfonic acid) fluorescence. The fluorescence of ANS varies as a function of its dielectric environment. The dye demonstrates greater fluorescence in hydrophobic environments, and lesser florescence in aqueous environments; therefore, it has been used to assess changes in protein folding stability²⁹. In the MBP-Dnase1L3 constructs, the ANS fluorescence is more intense in the presence of the R206C fusion protein compared to the WT fusion protein or MBP alone. This result indicates that the Dnase1L3 R206C hydrophobic core is more accessible to ANS relative to the WT protein (Fig. 2b) (Supplementary Data 3). Based on molecular dynamics simulation and Rosetta energy scoring³⁰, the loss of the salt bridge network increases ΔΔG of folding by 14 kcal/mol (Fig. 2c) (Supplementary Data 4). The less favorable free energy of folding of R206C corresponds to the disruption of three salt bridges (3–5 kcal/mol each)³¹, in accordance with our crystal structure. The triple salt-bridged Arg-206 residue is a key stabilizing residue in the Dnase1L3 molecule. Taken together, the reduced structural stability of R206C results in enzyme misfolding, and therefore reduces catalytic activity and impairs secretion to account for the net hypofunctionality of the R206C mutation.

**Fig. 2: The R206C mutation disrupts protein folding.**

A single structural divalent cation and a unique disulfide in the core enzyme

All members of the Dnase enzyme family require both structural and catalytic divalent cations. Dnase1 crystal structures^10,24 show evidence for four Ca²⁺ or Mg²⁺ binding sites, but a total of five cations have been postulated³². In Dnase1L3, we observed three divalent cations, with two Mg²⁺ present within the catalytic site (Fig. 3a). Using the nomenclature from Guéroult³², the ’II’ and ’III’ structural cations are absent in Dnase1L3. In Dnase1, the ’II’ divalent cation binding site is stabilized by a nearby disulfide bridge (Cys-101 to Cys-104). The divalent cation coordinating residues in the ’II’ binding site are conserved between Dnase1 and Dnase1L3, but the divalent cation binding site in Dnase1L3 is missing both disulfide cysteines and is one residue shorter relative to the homologous Dnase1 site (Fig. 3b). The missing disulfide bridge in Dnase1L3 prevents the coordinating residues from folding into the consensus divalent cation binding site. The lack of the ’II’ cation binding site in Dnase1L3 increases the flexibility of the corresponding loop. Indeed, the B-factors are elevated between the site ’II’ loops across each chain in the Dnase1L3 asymmetric unit (Fig. S5). Importantly, the absence of site ’II’ does not disrupt the position of the key DNA binding residue Arg-132 (Arg-111 in Dnase1)¹⁹.

**Fig. 3: Dnase1L3 lacks structural divalent cations present in Dnase1.**

Cation coordination of the ’III’ site is disrupted in Dnase1L3 because it lacks a critical Ca²⁺ coordinating residue. The primary Ca²⁺ coordinating residue in Dnase1, Asp-172, corresponds to Gly-193 in Dnase1L3 (Fig. 3c). The conserved conformation of the catalytic residue Asn-191 (Asn-170 in Dnase1) demonstrates that the Dnase1L3 Cys-194 to Cys-231 disulfide bridge may be sufficient for active site stability, even without Ca²⁺ coordination at site ’III’. Additionally, Dnase1L3 includes an extra Cys-24 to Cys-52 disulfide bond, corresponding to Ala-4 and Tyr-32 in Dnase1, respectively. The additional disulfide bridge in Dnase1L3 may partially compensate for the lack of two structural divalent cation sites.

Structural evidence for the double divalent cation mechanism of Dnase1 family catalysis

The two leading models of Dnase1-mediated DNA catalysis are the single-cation carboxylic acid and the double divalent cation model^9,10,11. The acidic crystallographic conditions of all previous structures precluded corroboration of either proposed model with respect to catalytic divalent cations^{10,24,33,34,35,36,37,38}. Dnase1L3 crystallized with two Mg²⁺ in the active site (Fig. S6), which provides the first structural evidence of the mutagenesis-based double divalent cation model for Dnase1 family catalysis¹¹ (Fig. 4a, b). To examine the interactions of the active site in the context of substrate DNA, we used all-atom molecular dynamics. We modeled DNA into the active site of Dnase1L3 based on the structure of Dnase1 crystallized with nucleic acid³³. In our MD simulations, the two active sites Mg²⁺ (’IVa’ and ’IVb’) each coordinate the oxygen atoms (OP1 and OP2) of the scissile phosphate of the DNA substrate. We observed a potential deprotonatable water coordinated by the ’IVb’ divalent cation (Fig. 4c). Furthermore, His-155 and His-274 are in position for classical acid-base catalysis¹¹ (Fig. 4c). The catalytic residue proposed in the single cation carboxylic acid model, Asp-189 (Asp-168 Dnase1), coordinates the ’IVa’ divalent cation in our crystal structure and simulations (Fig. 4a, b). We tested the potential of each of the active site residues for acid-base catalysis via in silico pH titration of Dnase1L3 and Dnase1. Calculations of the pKa of Asp-189 from the available Dnase1 structures and the four chains of our Dnase1L3 crystal structure indicate that Asp-189 maintains an acidic pKa (Fig. 4d), which predicts that Asp-189 cannot accept a proton during neutral pH acid-base catalysis (Supplementary Data 5). His-155 and His-274 are better candidates for acid-base catalytic residues, as their calculated pKa’s are near neutral pH³⁹ (Fig. 4d). Therefore, we propose Asp-189 is a divalent cation coordinating residue instead of a catalytic base.

**Fig. 4: The Dnase1L3 catalytic site uses two divalent cations.**

The mechanism by which the putative catalytic acid, His-155, is regenerated for its next round of catalysis has not previously been determined. In our model, the regeneration of His-155 can be accomplished by an Arg-132 substrate-sensing switch. In the Dnase1L3 crystal structure, which lacks DNA, Arg-132 interacts with His-155 to decrease the pKa of His-155 favoring the deprotonated form (Fig. S7a). Based on the MD simulation, in the presence of substrate DNA, Arg-132 switches to bind to the DNA backbone; thus permitting His-155 to accept a proton that can then be donated to the 3’O (Fig. S7b). Our Arg-132 switch hypothesis is in line with previous mutagenesis where the alanine substitution of the Arg-132 homolog in Dnase1 is catalytically inactive¹⁹. To corroborate our results, we performed fluorescence polarization experiments comparing purified Dnase1L3 R132A and Dnase1L3 WT. Consistent with the predicted role of Arg-132 as a substrate sensing catalytic switch, the R132A mutation decreased DNA affinity by a factor of 5, from a K_D of Dnase1L3 WT = 990 nM to a K_D for R132A = 4.95 μM (Fig. S8) (Supplementary Data 6). Therefore, our data suggests that Arg-132 increases catalytic rate by differentially polarizing His-155 along the reaction path.

Another key residue identified by mutagenesis, Asn-191¹⁹, coordinates the ’IVa’ divalent cation in the Dnase1L3 crystal structure and MD simulations (Fig. S7c, d). In our MD simulations with DNA, the δ2 amine of Asn-191 is positioned within hydrogen-bonding distance to the 3’O of the scissile phosphate of DNA (Fig. S7d). Asn-191 H-bonding to the 3’O can stabilize the leaving group oxygen for nucleophilic attack by the protonating His-155 (Fig. 4b). We propose a new role for Asn-191 as both a ’IVa’ cation coordinating and 3’ ester stabilizing residue in accordance with previous mutagenesis results¹⁹. Our biophysical findings are consistent with the double divalent cation model of Dnase1 catalysis¹¹.

The CTD promotes Dnase1L3 specific activity

The CTD of Dnase1L3 is a 23 amino acid long, highly basic polypeptide unique to Dnase1L3. The CTD has previously been shown to confer increased degradative capacity on lipid complexed DNA⁶. To determine whether the CTD itself possesses inherent nuclease activity, we cloned the CTD of Dnase1L3 onto an unrelated carrier protein, the SH3 domain from the yeast protein, Abp1. We selected the Abp1 SH3 domain because it is well defined by NMR spectroscopy⁴⁰, and it can aid in the overexpression of recombinant CTD polypeptide. We measured the plasmid degradation activity of the purified SH3-CTD fusion protein and the SH3 domain alone and found that neither SH3 nor SH3-CTD degraded DNA (Figure S1b, c). To measure the effectiveness of the CTD in conjunction with the core Dnase1L3 enzyme, we quantitated the plasmid degradation activity of Dnase1, Dnase1L3, and Dnase1L3 ΔCTD. Recombinant full-length and Dnase1L3 ΔCTD had a 10-fold lower EC₅₀, and therefore a higher relative activity, compared to standardized, commercially prepared Dnase1 at the same plasmid substrate concentration (Fig. 5a) (Supplementary Data 7). Because ΔCTD and full-length Dnase1L3 have comparable activity, we conclude that the increased naked plasmid degradation activity of Dnase1L3 relative to Dnase1 is not due to the CTD.

**Fig. 5: The CTD promotes complexed DNA degradation without lipid binding.**

In contrast, the CTD from Dnase1L3 is necessary for Dnase1L3-specific activity against complexed DNA. We determined the contribution of the CTD to the degradation of lipid-complexed or antibody-bound DNA by testing full-length Dnase1L3 and Dnase1L3 ΔCTD with two Dnase1L3 assays: the barrier to transfection assay¹⁶ and an immune complex (IC) degradation assay. Full-length Dnase1L3 reduced transfection of HEK cells to a greater degree than Dnase1 or Dnase1L3 ΔCTD (Fig. 5b) (Supplementary Data 8). Next, we tested Dnase1L3-specific activity against a more physiological DNA substrate, pathogenic autoantibody-DNA ICs. To determine the impact of the CTD on disrupting ICs, we measured chromatin IC degradation by ELISA. The ICs were treated with full-length Dnase1L3, Dnase1L3 ΔCTD, or Dnase1. Antibody-bound chromatin was most efficiently degraded by full-length Dnase1L3 (Fig. 5c) (Supplementary Data 9). We measured a 4-fold decrease in the EC₅₀ of Dnase1L3 with ICs compared to Dnase1 and Dnase1L3 ΔCTD (Fig. 5d) (Supplementary Data 10). Thus, the CTD of Dnase1L3 mediates the enhanced degradation of DNA in lipid- and antibody complexes, but not naked plasmid DNA.

The CTD of Dnase1L3 is a disordered DNA binding domain

The mechanism by which the CTD confers Dnase1L3-specific activity remains unknown. One hypothesis is that the Dnase1L3 CTD forms a C-terminal α-helix that binds and penetrates microparticles and lipids to liberate DNA from DNA-lipid complexes⁶. We tested this hypothesis by incubating full-length Dnase1L3 and Dnase1L3 ΔCTD with pre-defined liposomes (20:20:10:50/PC:PE:PS:cholesterol) and performed a co-sedimentation assay. Surprisingly, Dnase1L3 ΔCTD bound lipids with higher avidity compared to full-length Dnase1L3 (Fig. 5e). Furthermore, neither SH3-CTD nor SH3 alone bound phospholipids (Fig. 5e). Next, we tested whether the CTD bound to microparticles that were purified from HeLa cells. Similar to our results with liposomes, the CTD decreased microparticle interaction (Fig. 5f). Therefore, we conclude that the CTD does not participate in lipid binding.

We next determined the ability of the CTD to interact with DNA. To experimentally determine DNA binding, the CTD was cleaved from the SH3-CTD fusion protein using TEV protease and then purified away from the SH3 and TEV. DNA binding experiments were performed using the purified CTD peptide titrated into fluorescently-labeled 40-mer dsDNA in 100 mM NaCl at pH 7.4. In the fluorescent anisotropy assay, reduced tumbling of the dsDNA indicated CTD binding. The resulting K_D is 4.9 μM at 100 mM NaCl (Fig. 6a) (Supplementary Data 11). Therefore we conclude the CTD is a DNA-binding domain; however, the specific structural interactions between the CTD and DNA are still unknown.

To examine if the CTD possessed discernible secondary structure, we characterized the solution-state structure of the CTD, using the SH3-CTD fusion protein, by solution-state NMR spectroscopy. Standard triple-resonance backbone assignment experiments were utilized to assign the whole SH3 domain and linker and 74% of the CTD (Fig. 6b). The NMR data indicate that the CTD exists in a variety of conformations. The backbone resonances attributed to the CTD were used for CS-Rosetta⁴¹ structure determination, which yielded a number of structures containing a small N-terminal helix (Fig. S9a) followed by largely disordered regions (Fig. S9a,b). To corroborate the NMR results, we performed circular dichroism spectroscopy (CD) with synthetic CTD peptide. The resulting CD spectra were consistent with a disordered loop structure (Fig. 6c) in agreement with our NMR results. There is a possibility that the previously proposed helical CTD model⁶ was induced by binding to substrate. To test whether the isolated CTD changed its secondary structure as a function of substrate, we titrated dsDNA into CTD peptide and measured the resulting secondary structure by CD. The addition of substrate did not induce a conformational change in the CTD (Fig. 6c) (Supplementary Data 12). Therefore, we conclude that the CTD is an intrinsically disordered polypeptide even in the presence of DNA substrate.

To further investigate the molecular mechanism of the CTD-DNA interaction, we performed molecular dynamics simulations with a 16-mer of dsDNA and the NMR structure of the CTD equilibrated in an explicit solvent box. The MD simulations were run for a total of 1 μS in NAMD using the CHARMM36m forcefield. Our MD results corroborate the proposed DNA localizing role of the CTD with an immediate attraction towards the dsDNA (Fig. 6d) (Fig. S10a, b). The CTD was flexible during DNA binding and stabilized to two distinct conformations between molecular dynamics simulations (Fig. S10c, d). However, between simulations the intrinsically disordered CTD remained disordered during its interaction with DNA (Fig. 6c). In summary our data shows that the intrinsically disordered C-terminal domain interacts with DNA to increase Dnase1L3’s net affinity for its DNA substrate.

The integration of the core enzyme and C-terminal domain structures

The structure of full-length Dnase1L3 was solved using SAXS (Small Angle X-ray Scattering) to combine the high-resolution X-ray crystal and the CTD NMR structures. The solution-state SAXS profiles of full-length Dnase1L3 and Dnase1L3 ΔCTD were both collected to describe the CTD’s contribution to the full-length enzyme. As expected, recombinant Dnase1L3 ΔCTD is a globular protein in solution, with a radius of gyration (R_g) of 21 Å ± 0.4. The full-length Dnase1L3 maintains a similar R_g of 24.1 Å ± 2.5, but the pairwise distribution function indicates a population of scattering atoms roughly 44 Å away from the centroid of the core domain (Fig. 6e) (Supplementary Data 13). The distance between these two populations of scattering atoms correlates to an almost fully extended CTD separated from the core enzyme. Bead model reconstructions of full-length Dnase1L3 accounted for this extra density with an extended tail volume away from the globular core domain (Fig. 6f). MultiFOXS⁴² models generated from the indirect Fourier transform of full-length Dnase1L3 indicate a discrete solvent-exposed CTD (Fig. 6f). The pair distance distribution function obtained from solution-state SAXS analysis shows that full-length Dnase1L3 is a two-domain, pear-shaped molecule⁴³ (Fig. 6f). Our results indicate that the CTD is an intrinsically disordered polypeptide that is extended from the body of the core enzyme.

Discussion

Soluble serum nucleases such as Dnase1 and Dnase1L3 digest antigenic nucleic acids that are complexed within discarded membranes or with DNA-binding proteins. Given the complexed nature of the substrate DNA, it is less exposed and therefore less available for digestion by Dnase1. Fortunately, the activity of Dnase1L3 is significantly broader^6,8. The importance of Dnase1L3 in clearing antigenic DNA is highlighted by the human diseases that result from mutations within the DNASE1L3 gene. To understand Dnase1L3’s broad range of nucleic acid degradation activity, we performed a structure-function analysis to resolve the features of Dnase1L3 responsible for the increased activity. We combined the high-resolution X-ray structure of the core domain with solution-state data of the intrinsically disordered C-terminal domain (CTD) to develop a structure of the complete Dnase1L3 molecule using Dnase1L3 expressed in E. coli.

Nucleases are notoriously difficult to overproduce in bacteria due to their DNA laddering activity on the exposed bacterial chromosome¹⁸. We overcame this hurdle by expressing Dnase1L3 as an enzymatically inactive fusion protein. Dnase1L3 could be switched to an enzymatically active state through proteolytic cleavage of the MBP fusion partner and subsequent purification of the Dnase1L3 enzyme (Fig. S1a). The MBP-Dnase1L3 fusion protein approach allowed us to take advantage of the solubility enhancement from MBP⁴⁴, in addition to the potential steric inhibition of Dnase1L3 provided by MBP during translation. We predict that this expression system can be utilized to produce other nucleases besides Dnase1L3.

The enzymatic activity of nucleases such as Dnase1 and Dnase1L3 are particularly important in diseases such as cystic fibrosis (CF). The viscous sputum that occurs within the lungs of CF patients contains DNA and actin⁴⁵, both of which contribute to the abnormal visco-elasticity of pulmonary sputum⁴⁶. Utilizing its role as a general nuclease, Dnase1 can act as a mucolytic that digests the DNA component of sputum in the lower respiratory tract⁴⁵. However, the excess of actin within the sputum abrogates the activity of native Dnase1. To address the actin limitation, Dnase1 has been reengineered to overcome actin inhibition (Pulmozyme^®); however, in situ actin inhibition remains a therapeutic concern²³. Dnase1L3 is naturally resistant to actin inhibition, in part, due to Phe-134 that disrupts the ’central hydrophobic interface’ with actin in Dnase1^12,25. A similar mechanism of actin resistance was proposed for Dnase1L2⁴⁷. Other determinants for actin resistance in Dnase1L3 include the disruption of stabilizing salt-bridged networks needed for actin binding to Dnase1, and the electrostatic repulsion of actin at the binding interface. Therefore, Dnase1L3 is naturally resistant to actin inhibition due to predicted and previously undescribed structural features.

The frequency of the R206C single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) allele of DNASE1L3 is fairly common (1.7 to 7.7%) in various populations²⁶. In fact, R206C homozygosity is causally associated with rheumatoid arthritis⁴⁸, systemic scleroderma⁴⁹, and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)⁷. From a biochemical perspective, the R206C SNP displays decreased or absent²⁶ enzyme activity and reduced enzyme secretion²⁷. Previous literature explained the decreased enzyme activity in terms of increased mobility of the loop preceding Arg-206 (Dnase1L3 residues 193–196) that disrupts nucleic acid binding²⁸. In addition, the authors concluded that only the interaction between Arg-206 and Glu-170 is relevant to the hypofunctional phenotype²⁸. However, our crystallographic and molecular dynamics results reveal a more extensively salt-bridged network between Arg-206 and Asp-166, Glu-167 and Glu-170. Further, ANS fluorescence experiments demonstrate that the R206C mutation disrupts protein folding. Our MD analysis indicates there is a general increase in the calculated free energy of folding as a result of the loss of the critical Arg-206 salt bridging interactions (Fig. S4a). Indeed, we find that the R206C mutation alters the calculated protein stability by 14 kcal/mol, consistent with three salt bridges based on the crystal structure (Fig. 2a, c). It therefore follows that errant protein folding would also affect extracellular secretion of the enzyme²⁷ that results in a net hypofunctional Dnase1L3.

In our crystal structure and molecular dynamics simulations of Dnase1L3, Asn-191 coordinates Mg²⁺ ’IVa’ consistent with previous mutagenesis results¹⁹. Our analysis of the Dnase1L3 active site revealed a potential mechanism of His-155 regeneration via Arg-132, consistent with mutagenesis data and the proposed double divalent cation model¹¹. The principal dissenting Dnase1 catalytic mechanism is the single-cation carboxylic acid model, which derives from the 4AWN crystal structure¹⁰. We show that Asp-189 in Dnase1L3 (homologous to Asp-168 in Dnase1) instead binds to the previously predicted second active site divalent cation, ’IVa’³². The disagreement in Mg²⁺ coordination via Asp-168 (Asp-189 in Dnase1L3) can be explained by the more acidic pH of crystallization of 4AWN¹⁰. We provide the first structural evidence to support the double divalent cation model for the Dnase1 family¹¹. Our structural evidence clarifies the number of active site divalent cations and the role of several catalytic residues in the Dnase1 family. Further investigation is needed to resolve the means of electrophilic attack and protonation of the 3’O on the scissile phosphate.

Aside from catalytic divalent cations, Dnase1L3 binds structural divalent cations differently than previously observed in Dnase1. The two missing divalent cation binding sites in Dnase1L3 have been described as structurally stabilizing binding sites in Dnase1³². Furthermore, the disruption of the ’II’ and ’III’ binding sites in Dnase1 decreases the measured enzyme activity⁵⁰. Nevertheless, in the absence of these stabilizing cations, the conformations of the catalytic residues in Dnase1L3 are similar to those observed in Dnase1. To address the perceived lack of stabilizing cations in Dnase1L3, we propose that the ’II’ and ’III’ sites observed in Dnase1 are unnecessary due in part to additional disulfide-mediated stabilization. The missing ’III’ cation binding site is proposed to stabilize: the active site, the disulfide bridge, and nearby DNA-binding residues in Dnase1⁵⁰. In Dnase1L3, the absence of the Dnase1 ’III’ coordinating residue Asp-172 (Gly-193 in Dnase1L3) does not disrupt the disulfide located between Cys-194 to Cys-231. The additional disulfide bond present in Dnase1L3 but not Dnase1, Cys-24 to Cys-52, may allow for the reduced necessity of divalent cation-mediated stabilization.

Dnase1L3 displays an enhanced substrate diversity through its unique, highly basic C-terminal domain (CTD)^5,6. Given the physiological role of Dnase1L3 and the exaggerated charge of its CTD, two binding targets were proposed: phospholipid membranes and DNA. Our biophysical characterization of Dnase1L3 reveals that the CTD is an extended, intrinsically disordered domain that binds dsDNA with μM affinity at physiological salt concentrations. Dnase1L3 showed no lipid or microparticle partitioning, signifying the CTD is indeed a DNA affinity domain and not a lipid binding domain. Functionally, the intrinsically disordered CTD possesses the conformational versatility to bind complexed DNA in various forms, including nucleosomal, microparticle, and immune complexed DNA. We propose that the CTD is a conformationally flexible, disordered domain that enhances heterogeneous DNA binding and confers the unique activity attributed to Dnase1L3.

Methods

Cloning and expression

The genes for full-length human Dnase1L3 and the Dnase1L3 ΔCTD were sub-cloned into BamHI/XhoI sites in a Tobacco-Etch Protease (TEV) cleavable, his-tagged, maltose-binding protein (MBP) expression vector for E. coli expression. The expression plasmid was transformed into Rosetta-Gami^®2 (DE3) competent cells (Novagen) to maintain disulfide bond formation. Single colonies were picked and grown to confluence in 100 ml of LB media. 10 ml of culture was inoculated into 1 L of Terrific Broth (TB) media, and grown to OD₆₀₀ of 2.0. The culture was induced with 400 μM IPTG and grown at 18 ^∘C for 18 h. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 18,000 rpm in an SS-40 rotor for 20 min. Cell pellets were frozen at −80 ^∘C until used for purification.

SH3-CTD was expressed in BL-21-Gold (DE3) E. coli cells (Agilent) in 3 L of Terrific Broth, induced with 400 μM IPTG and grown at 18 ^∘C for 18 h. Cells were harvested by centrifugation, frozen in liquid N₂ and stored at −80 ^∘C until ready for use.

Purification of full-length Dnase1L3, Dnase1L3ΔCTD, SH3-CTD and Dnase1L3-MBP fusion

15–20 g of cells were resuspended in 160 ml of lysis buffer (20 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 300 mM NaCl, 1 mM CaCl₂). The cells were lysed using a microfluidizer and spun down at 19,500 rpm in a JA20 rotor for 50 min. The supernatant was collected and run through a newly regenerated Ni²⁺/NTA column. The column was washed with lysis buffer that contained 30 mM imidazole. The protein was eluted with lysis buffer that contains 250 mM imidazole, 5 mM maltose. 0.1 mM PMSF was added to the eluted sample. To remove the MBP fusion protein and to isolate the Dnase1L3, 2–3 mg of TEV protease were added to the sample and incubated at 4 ^∘C overnight. An SDS gel was run to ensure the fusion protein was cut by TEV before moving on to the next purification step. The sample was diluted to 100 mM NaCl with Buffer A (20 mM Hepes pH 7.4, 1 mM CaCl₂). An SP-Sepharose (cation exchange) column was prepared and the sample was run through the column while collecting the flow-through (which contains the MBP). The column was then washed with Buffer A until the UV returned to the baseline before the sample was loaded onto the column. The protein was eluted with a gradient of 0–100% Buffer B (20 mM Hepes pH 7.4, 1 M NaCl, 1 mM CaCl₂) with a volume of at least three times the bed volume of the column. Purity was measured by SDS-PAGE. Finally, the sample was concentrated to run on an Superdex-75 gel filtration column equilibrated with Buffer C (20 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 400 mM NaCl, 1 mM CaCl₂). The peak was then run on an SDS gel and imaged using a BioRad Stain-Free Gel imaging system.

To purify SH3-CTD, centrifuged bacteria were lysed by microfluidization and insoluble cell components were pelleted with 19,500 x g centrifugation. SH3-CTD was separated from soluble lysate with 6-His Ni²⁺/NTA affinity chromatography. The high-affinity fraction containing SH3-CTD was eluted at 250 mM Imidazole concentration. The elution was concentrated to 1 ml and injected into a 75 ml Superdex-75 size exclusion column. The monodisperse fraction was exchanged into 1 M NaCl and incubated overnight with 1 mg of TEV. The CTD was separated from the SH3 and TEV using Ni-NTA affinity chromatography, the CTD fraction came out in the FT. The CTD was buffer exchanged using 700 Da cutoff filters into 100 mM NaCl and concentrated with lyophilization.

The wild-type Dnase1L3 and Dnase1L3 R206C MBP fusion proteins were produced and purified in a similar manner as the full-length Dnase1L3 purification methods described above. However, after Ni²⁺/NTA affinity chromatography, no TEV protease was added to the sample. Instead the fusion protein was purified to homogeneity by Q-Sepharose anion exchange chromatography followed by size exclusion chromatography. At each step, the purity was assessed by SDS-PAGE.

Cell culture

HeLa cells (ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA), CCL-2) and HEK cells (ATCC CRL-1573) were cultured at 37 ^∘C and 5% CO₂ in DMEM (Corning, Corning, NY, USA) supplemented with 10% Equafetal bovine serum (Atlas, Fort Collins, CO), 1 × L-glutamine (D10) and 1 × penicillin/streptomycin. All cell lines were negative for mycoplasma.

Antibodies

The anti-Dnase1L3 rabbit polyclonal antibody was obtained from Abnova, and the anti-dsDNA monoclonal antibody was from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (DSHB, Iowa City, IA). Clone autoanti-dsDNA was deposited with the DSHB by Voss, E.W. (DSHB Hybridoma Product autoanti-dsDNA). HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies were from Jackson Immunoresearch (West Grove, Pennsylvania).

Plasmid degradation assay

Plasmid degradation assays were performed in a 10 μl reaction volume, 200 ng of plasmid DNA was incubated with varying concentrations of Dnase1L3 full length, Dnase1L3 ΔCTD, Dnase1, MBP-Dnase1L3, SH3-CTD or SH3 alone in Dnase assay buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 5 mM MgCl₂, 2 mM CaCl₂) for 30 min at 37 ^∘C⁵¹. The extent of DNA degradation was quantitated by measuring the integrated intensity of degraded and intact plasmid DNA from Gel Red-stained agarose gels using Photoshop Creative Suite (Adobe, San Jose, CA) and determining the percent degradation. The EC₅₀ for plasmid degradation was calculated from the dose-response curve using logistic regression.

Barrier to transfection

HEK cells (ATCC CRL-1573) were plated 1 day prior to the assay at 5 × 10⁵ cells per well in a 24 well plate. DNA-lipid complexes were prepared by incubating 100 ng of eGFP-N1 plasmid (Takara Biosciences) with Lipofectamine 2000 for 20 min. DNA-lipid complexes were then incubated with 100 ng each of full-length Dnase1L3, Dnase1L3 ΔCTD or Dnase1 at 37 ^∘C, 5% CO₂ for 30 min. HEK cells were then transfected with the control or the Dnase treated DNA-lipid complexes and incubated for 48 h. The cells were supplemented with fresh D10 media after 24 h. Cells were harvested, washed in FACS buffer (2% fetal calf serum, 0.05% NaN₃ in 1x PBS), and analyzed on an Attune NxT flow cytometer. Transfection efficiency was 70% in control cells. Reduced transfection efficiency was calculated compared to control transfected cells.

Immune complex degradation

To measure immune complex degradation, a modified ELISA protocol was used. ELISA plates were precoated with 0.05 mg/mL poly-L-lysine at room temp for 20 min, washed with 1x nuclease-free water, and coated with 5 μg/ml calf thymus DNA (Sigma) overnight at 4 ^∘C. After washing 3 x in PBS with 0.05% Tween (PBST) and blocking for 1 h at room temp with 1% BSA in PBST, 250 pg/mL anti-dsDNA antibody was added to all wells except the standard curve. The standard curve received 2-fold dilutions of anti-dsDNA antibody starting at 500 pg/mL. After 1 h, the plates were washed 3x in PBST, Dnase (diluted into 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 300 mM NaCl, 1 mM CaCl₂) was added, and plates incubated 37 ^∘C for 2 h. Plates were washed 3x in PBST, incubated with HRP conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG antibody (1:20,000), and developed using 0.2 mg/ml TMB (Sigma), 0.015% H₂O₂ in 100 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.5. The reaction was stopped with 0.5 M H₂SO₄. A₄₅₀ was measured and antibody concentration in each well calculated. The percentage of dsDNA antibody remaining in the well was calculated by comparison to control. Percentage immune complex degradation was 100 - %remaining antibody. The EC₅₀ for each Dnase was calculated using logistic regression.

Generation of microparticles

Microparticles from HeLa cells (ATCC CCL-2) were generated by treatment with staurosporine to make the cells apoptotic⁵². Cells were cultured overnight and then treated with 1 mM staurosporine (Sigma-Aldrich) for 8 h in serum-free DMEM. Microparticles were harvested and debris removed by centrifugation for 5 min at 1500 rpm. The supernatant was collected and centrifuged at 20,000 x g for 30 min to pellet the microparticles.

Generation of liposomes

Synthetic liposomes were prepared by mixing 20:20:10:50 mol percent of phosphatidylcholine (Avanti), phosphatidylethanol-amine (Avanti), phosphatidylserine (Avanti) and cholesterol (Sigma). This lipid mixture was dried under N₂ and resuspended to a final concentration of 4 mg/mL in liposome buffer (15 mM HEPES pH 7.2, 1 mM Mg(CH₃COO)₂ and 50 mM sorbitol). Liposomes were incubated at 37 ^∘C for 1 h, freeze/thawed using dry ice/37 ^∘C bath 5 times and stored at −80 ^∘C until further use.

Lipid and microparticles binding assay

Microparticles prepared from HeLa cells (ATCC CCL-2) or 4 mg/ml liposomes were incubated with 10 mg/mL bovine serum albumin carrier protein and 6 μM full length Dnase1L3, Dnase1L3 ΔCTD or Dnase1 in 1x PBS with Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺ on ice for 1 h. Microparticles or liposomes were then centrifuged at 20,000 x g 4 ^∘C for 15 min and the supernatant saved for SDS-PAGE analysis. The pellet was washed with 1x PBS with Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺ and centrifuged at 20,000 x g 4 ^∘C for 15 min. The resulting pellet was resuspended in SDS sample buffer. Samples were resolved on a 12.5% gel and either Coomassie-stained or transferred to a 0.45-μm nitrocellulose membrane. Immunoblotting with anti-Dnase1L3 (1:1000) was followed by anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to HRP (1:10,000). Antibody staining was visualized on a FluorChemE (Protein Simple, San Jose, CA, USA) using enhanced chemiluminescence reagent [0.01% H₂O₂ (Walmart, Bentonville, AR, USA), 0.2 mM p-Coumaric acid (Sigma-Aldrich), 1.25 mM Luminol (Sigma-Aldrich), and 0.1 M Tris, pH 8.4]. Immunoblots were analyzed using Photoshop Creative Suite 3.

Fluorescence polarization

The dsDNA binding assays with the CTD were performed using a FAM (carboxyfluorescein)-labeled 40-mer DNA (5’-FAM-GTGTTCGGACTCTGCCTCAAGACGGTAGTCAACGTGCTTG-3’ and 5’-CAAGCACGTTGACTACCGTCTTGAGGCAGAGTCCGAACAC-3’, IDT)⁵³. The fluorescence polarization binding assays for Dnase1, Dnase1L3 WT and Dnase1L3 R132A were performed using the same 40mer sequence labelled with FITC (fluorescein 5(6)-isothiocyanate). The dsDNA was made by annealing the fluorophore-labeled ssDNA to an unlabeled complementary strand at 95 ^∘C. Fluorescence polarization (FP) experiments for the CTD were performed in binding buffer (50 mM Hepes pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1%Glycerol, 1 mM TCEP, 0.1% PEG 6000 w/v), with 20 nM dsDNA, and an increasing amount of isolated CTD for a final volume of 25 μL. FP experiments for Dnase1L3 R132A were performed similarly, but the binding buffer contained increased EDTA, 1 mM to inhibit DNA degradation. Samples were incubated for 30 min at 37 ^∘C in a 384-well black plate (Fisher Scientific) before reading for FAM or FITC-FP in a Synergy Neo2 plate reader using the FP 485/530 filter. Three technical replicates were performed. The apparent dissociation constants were calculated by fitting the data to a modified version of the Hill equation⁵⁴.

ANS fluorescence

Each of the protein samples were diluted into 20 mM HEPES, 400 mM NaCl, 1 mM CaCl₂ pH 7.4 to a concentration of 2.2 μM. The protein was incubated for 30 min at 25 ^∘C with 25 μM ANS (8-anilino-1-naphthalenesulfonic acid). ANS was excited at 365 nm and fluorescence was recorded from 400 to 600 nm for buffer, the MBP control sample, Dnase1L3 WT fusion protein, and Dnase1L3 R206C fusion protein in a 96 well plate using the BioTek Synergy4 Multimode Plate Reader. The excitation/emission slit width was set to 5 nm. The mean fluorescence for each wavelength was taken from three independent measurements, and the mean ± standard deviation is reported for each datapoint.

Crystallization, data collection, structure solution and refinement

Purified Dnase1L3 ΔCTD was concentrated to 8 mg/ml and was screened with multiple sparse matrix crystallization kits. Initial crystal hits were expanded to improve crystal quality and yield more useful crystals for X-ray analysis. The final crystallization condition was 19% PEG 8000, 250 mM MgCl₂, 100 mM Tris, pH 8.5 at 10 ^∘C. The final Dnase1L3 ΔCTD crystals grew to a final size of ~0.5 mm in 60 days and were obelisk-shaped. The Dnase1L3 ΔCTD crystallized in the P1 space group with four molecules in the asymmetric unit (Table 1). The final X-ray dataset was collected at the SLAC beamline 14-1. The Dnase1L3 ΔCTD crystals diffracted to 1.9 Å .

The structure was solved with molecular replacement, as implemented in Phenix⁵⁵, using the 1DNK structure as the target. X-ray data to 2.2 Å was used for refinement. Electron density was fit using COOT⁵⁶ prior to additional rounds of structural refinement in Phenix. Each of the four molecules in the asymmetric unit was refined independently using Phenix⁵⁵.

Circular dichroism

A commercially synthesized peptide corresponding to the last 23 amino acids of Dnase1L3 (i.e., C-terminal domain (SSRAFTNSKKSVTLRKKTKSKRS) (United BioSystem Inc, Herndon, VA, US) was resuspended from powder in milli-Q water to a stock concentration of 50 μM. The stock was diluted to 20 nM in 5 mM NaCl with increasing concentrations of DNA from 0 nM to 293 μM of a self-complementary DNA substrate (GCGATCGCGCGATCGC). The circular dichroism data were collected on a Jasco J-815 CD spectrophotometer from 190 nm to 350 nm. Buffer subtractions were the equivalent concentration of oligomer DNA in 5 mM NaCl. The spectra were recorded in CD units of mdeg and then converted to molar ellipticity. The CTD was disordered throughout the measurements; however, the background subtraction became increasingly different from the Sample CD at high concentrations of DNA (293 μM) likely corresponding to differences in the secondary structure of the DNA, even though the peptide remained disordered.

NMR

For NMR experiments, transformed Rosetta BL21 cells were grown in 2x minimal M9 media using¹⁵NH₄Cl (1 g/L) and unlabeled or¹³C D-glucose (3 g/L) as sole nitrogen and carbon sources, respectively. Protein expression was induced with 0.5 mM isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside for 18 h at 25 ^∘C. Bacterial cells were suspended in SH3 lysis buffer (20 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 300 mM NaCl). Cell suspensions were lysed in a microfluidizer. Lysates were clarified by centrifugation at 19,500 rpm in a JA-20 rotor for 45 min at 4 ^∘C and loaded on Ni-NTA resin pre-equilibrated with lysis buffer. SH3-CTD constructs were eluted in 250 mM imidazole lysis buffer. The purification was followed by size exclusion chromatography in SH3 lysis buffer. SH3-CTD constructs were then buffer exchanged into 20 mM Hepes pH 7.4, 300 mM NaCl, and 10% D₂O and concentrated to a desirable concentration (0.7 mM) for NMR spectroscopy using a 5 kDa molecular weight cutoff centrifugal concentrator (Millipore). All NMR experiments were performed on an Agilent 600 MHz (14.1 T) DD2 NMR spectrometer equipped with a room temperature HCN z-axis gradient probe. NMR data were processed with NMRPipe/NMRDraw⁵⁷ and analyzed with CCPN Analysis⁵⁸. Backbone ¹³Cα,¹³Cβ,¹³C’,¹⁵N, and ¹HN resonance assignments of SH3-CTD were obtained from standard gradient-selected triple-resonance HNCACB, HN(CO)CACB, HNCO, HN(CA)CO⁵⁹, HCCH-TOCSY⁶⁰, and NOESY HSQC⁶¹ experiments at 22 ^∘C. Assignment data were collected with a random nonuniform sampling (NUS) scheme and reconstruction of NUS spectra was performed using Sparse Multidimensional Iterative Lineshape-Enhanced (SMILE) program⁶². The CTD and the linker between CTD and SH3 domains assignment were isolated by excluding the SH3 domain assigned residues using an assignment reference from the BMRB (code = 18054)⁴⁰.

SAXS data collection and processing

SAXS data were collected on a Xenocs BioXolver configured for SAXS/WAXS/GISAXS with a Genix 3D Cu HFVL source and a DECTRIS EIGER 1M detector. Purified full-length Dnase1L3 and ΔCTD were concentrated to 4 mg/ml. The enzyme was monodisperse, as determined by size exclusion chromatography, and was in 400 mM NaCl, 20 mM HEPES, 1 mM CaCl₂. The filter concentrator flowthrough buffer was used for SAXS buffer subtraction. The proteins were irradiated five times for 300 s each and averaged before buffer subtraction with BioXtas-RAW. The Indirect Fourier Transform was performed using GNOM⁶³ with the limits based on the GNOM analysis of IFT quality. Bead models were constructed using Dammif/n⁶⁴. MultiFoXS⁴² was used in conjunction with the pairwise distribution function to refine the crystal structure of Dnase1L3 ΔCTD grafted with the CTD structure from NMR using comparative structure modeling⁶⁵.

Statistics and reproducibility

Prism 5.0 (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA, USA) or Excel were used for statistical analysis. Data are represented as mean ± SEM or standard deviation as indicated. The EC₅₀ was calculated by logistic regression. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA or repeated measures ANOVA; p < 0.05 was statistically significant. Graphs were generated in R ggplot2, Excel and Photoshop.

Molecular dynamics

All molecular dynamics input files were generated with CHARMM-GUI for NAMD with the CHARMM36m force field⁶⁶. The high-resolution crystal structure of Dnase1L3 was used throughout for MD. The total charge of the system was neutralized by randomly substituting water molecules with Mg²⁺ and Cl⁻ to obtain neutrality with 0.15 M salt concentration. The TIP3 model for water was used throughout. A switching function was applied to the van der Waal’s potential energy from 10 to 12 Å to calculate nonbonded interactions. The Particle Mesh Ewald (PME) algorithm was used to calculate electrostatic interactions. Equilibration runs used the NVT ensemble at 300 K. Energy minimization was performed for 10,000 steps to avoid any bad contacts generated while solvating the system. C-α restraints were generated from VMD. The simulations were analyzed using VMD. Production runs were performed on the HPCC Nocona cluster at Texas Tech University.

The structure for the CTD, as determined by solution-state NMR, was isolated from the SH3 domain along with DNA based on the 1BNA 12-mer of dsDNA. The solution box was built with the CTD and a 12-mer (5’-CGCGAATTCGCG-3’) dsDNA molecule that was placed ~30 Å and 50 Å from the CTD. The distances were required to minimize the bias of the simulation. The simulation was run for a total of 1 μs with neutralizing KCl. VMD and the Bio3D library for R⁶⁷ were used to analyze the trajectories.

DNA was added to the system based on a superposition of the 1DNK crystal structure of Dnase1 with DNA. Chain C of the Dnase1L3 high-resolution crystal structure was the starting structure for the MD runs with DNA. A 75Å x 75Å x 75Å water box with 150 mM MgCl₂ (charge neutralized) was sized to the input Dnase1L3 molecule and was built using periodic boundary conditions. The simulated system contained ~35,000 solvent atoms, ~69 counter ions, and 4336 protein atoms. The crystallographic Mg²⁺ were retained. Three simulations were run for 1 μs each, starting from separate equilibration runs.

The R206C mutation was generated with PyRosetta using Chain A of the crystal structure and Rosetta relaxed 3 times with the lowest energy score chosen prior to MD simulation. The solution box was built with 150 mM MgCl₂ and charge neutralization. The crystallographic Mg²⁺ were retained. A total of three production runs of 500 ns for Arg-206 and Cys-206 were generated for analysis. The last 100 ns (400–500 ns) were sufficient to reach a stable snapshot of each repeat. Ten frames, each 10 ns apart from the last 100 ns of the MD simulations were analyzed for free energy of folding using Rosetta, with the lowest energy score, REF-2015, after three full Rosetta relax cycles compared between Arg-206 and Cys-206. A one-way ANOVA, (alpha = 0.05) was performed to highlight the difference between the single comparison of significance, Arg-206 or Cys-206 on free energy of folding. The average computed free energy of folding from 10 timestamps across 3 simulations, for both WT and R206C Dnase1L3, was measured as −664.99 (n = 30) for WT (Arg206) and −650.96 (n = 30) for R206C. The standard deviation for WT free energy of folding was 13.633, and 15.642 for R206C. The difference in folding was determined to be 14.03 ± 3.79 (s.d.), p = 0.000476.

Iso-electric point calculations

Iso-electric calculations were computed using H++^68,69,70. For the actin-binding loop following the actin-binding helix in Dnase1²⁴, and the homologous loop in Dnase1L3, the regions of interest were isolated in Pymol and processed using the H++ web server at a pH of 7, with a salinity of 0.15 M, internal dielectric of 0.1, and external dielectric of 80.

pKa of active site residues

The computational determination of acid dissociation constant was done with a local installation of DelPhi-Pka³⁸. All four Dnase1L3 molecules in the asymmetric unit and each available Dnase1 structure^{10,24,33,34,35,36,37}, were processed for pKa calculation in DelPhi-Pka after being cleaned of any hetero-atoms.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

All crystallographic coordinates and structure factors have been deposited in the PDB under the accession code 7KIU. The NMR chemical shifts and assignments for SH3-CTD are deposited to the BMRB with accession code 51384. All source data used to generate the graphs and charts in the manuscript is included in the Supplementary Data. All uncropped and unedited blots are included as Figs. S11 through S14.

References

Tsokos, G. C. Systemic lupus erythematosus. New Engl. J. Med. 365, 2110–2121 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Özçakar, Z. B. et al. Dnase1L3 mutations in hypocomplementemic urticarial vasculitis syndrome. Arthritis Rheumatism 65, 2183–2189 (2013).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Zhong, X.-Y. et al. Increased concentrations of antibody-bound circulatory cell-free DNA in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Chem 53, 1609–1614 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jiménez-Alcázar, M. et al. Host DNases prevent vascular occlusion by neutrophil extracellular traps. Science 358, 1202–1206 (2017).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Keyel, P. A. Dnases in health and disease. Dev. Biol. 429, 1–11 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sisirak, V. et al. Digestion of chromatin in apoptotic cell microparticles prevents autoimmunity. Cell 166, 88–101 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Al-Mayouf, S. M. et al. Loss-of-function variant in Dnase1L3 causes a familial form of systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat. Genetics 43, 1186–1188 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hartl, J. et al. Autoantibody-mediated impairment of Dnase1L3 activity in sporadic systemic lupus erythematosus. J. Exp. Med. 218, e20201138 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Engavale, M. et al. Dnase1 family in autoimmunity. Encyclopedia 1, 527–541 (2021).
Article Google Scholar
Parsiegla, G., Noguere, C., Santell, L., Lazarus, R. A. & Bourne, Y. The structure of human Dnase I bound to magnesium and phosphate ions points to a catalytic mechanism common to members of the Dnase I-like superfamily. Biochemistry 51, 10250–10258 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jones, S. J., Worrall, A. F. & Connolly, B. A. Site-directed mutagenesis of the catalytic residues of bovine pancreatic deoxyribonuclease I. J. Mol. Biol. 264, 1154–1163 (1996).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lazarus, R. A. & Wagener†, J. S. Recombinant human deoxyribonuclease i. In Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, 471–488 (Springer International Publishing, 2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00710-222.
Ribeiro, A. J. M. et al. Mechanism and catalytic site atlas (m-CSA): a database of enzyme reaction mechanisms and active sites. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, D618–D623 (2017).
Article PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Napirei, M., Ludwig, S., Mezrhab, J., Klöckl, T. & Mannherz, H. G. Murine serum nucleases - contrasting effects of plasmin and heparin on the activities of Dnase1 and Dnase1-like-3 (Dnase1L3). FEBS J. 276, 1059–1073 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Soni, C. & Reizis, B. Self-DNA at the epicenter of SLE: Immunogenic forms, regulation, and effects. Front. Immunol. 10, https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.01601 (2019).
Wilber, A., Lu, M. & Schneider, M. C. Deoxyribonuclease 1-like 3 is an inducible macrophage barrier to liposomal transfection. Mol. Ther. 6, 35–42 (2002).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 (2021).
Doherty, A. J., Connolly, B. A. & Worrall, A. F. Overproduction of the toxic protein, bovine pancreatic DNasel, in escherichia coli using a tightly controlled T7-promoter-based vector. Gene 136, 337–340 (1993).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pan, C. Q., Uumer, J. S., Herzka, A. & Lazarus, R. A. Mutational analysis of human DNase I at the DNA binding interface: Implications for DNA recognition, catalysis, and metal ion dependence. Protein Sci. 7, 628–636 (1998).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lam, C. et al. Taming hyperactive hDNase I: Stable inducible expression of a hyperactive salt- and actin-resistant variant of human deoxyribonuclease I in CHO cells. Biotechnol. Prog. 33, 523–533 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Fujihara, J. et al. Two N-linked glycosylation sites (Asn18 and Asn106) are both required for full enzymatic activity, thermal stability, and resistance to proteolysis in mammalian deoxyribonuclease I. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 72, 3197–3205 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pan, C. Q. et al. Improved potency of hyperactive and actin-resistant human Dnase I variants for treatment of cystic fibrosis and systemic lupus erythematosus. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 18374–18381 (1998).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bucki, R. et al. Enhancement of pulmozyme activity in purulent sputum by combination with poly-aspartic acid or gelsolin. J Cystic Fibrosis 14, 587–593 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kabsch, W., Mannherz, H. G., Suck, D., Pai, E. F. & Holmes, K. C. Atomic structure of the actin: DNase I complex. Nature 347, 37–44 (1990).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ulmer, J. S. et al. Engineering actin-resistant human DNase I for treatment of cystic fibrosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 93, 8225–8229 (1996).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ueki, M. et al. Caucasian-specific allele in non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms of the gene encoding deoxyribonuclease 1-like 3, potentially relevant to autoimmunity, produces an inactive enzyme. Clinica Chimica Acta 407, 20–24 (2009).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Coke, L. N. et al. Arg206Cys substitution in Dnase1L3 causes a defect in Dnase1L3 protein secretion that confers risk of systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann. Rheumatic Dis. 80, 782–787 (2021).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zervou, M. et al. Association of the Dnase1L3 rs35677470 polymorphism with systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis and systemic sclerosis: Structural biological insights. Mol. Med. Rep. 22, 4492–4498 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Harsini, F. M. et al. FerA is a membrane-associating four-helix bundle domain in the ferlin family of membrane-fusion proteins. Sci. Rep. 8, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29184-1 (2018).
Alford, R. F. et al. The rosetta all-atom energy function for macromolecular modeling and design. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 13, 3031–3048 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Anderson, D. E., Becktel, W. J. & Dahlquist, F. W. pH-induced denaturation of proteins: a single salt bridge contributes 3-5 kcal/mol to the free energy of folding of t4 lysozyme. Biochemistry 29, 2403–2408 (1990).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Guéroult, M., Picot, D., Abi-Ghanem, J., Hartmann, B. & Baaden, M. How cations can assist DNase1 in DNA binding and hydrolysis. PLoS Comput. Biol. 6, e1001000 (2010).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Weston, S., Lahm, A. & Suck, D. X-ray structure of the Dnase I-d(GGTATACC)2 complex at 2 Å resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 226, 1237–1256 (1992).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chereau, D. et al. Actin-bound structures of Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (WASP)-homology domain 2 and the implications for filament assembly. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102, 16644–16649 (2005).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Lahm, A. & Suck, D. DNase I-induced DNA conformation. Journal of Molecular Biology 222, 645–667 (1991).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kudryashov, D. S. et al. Connecting actin monomers by iso-peptide bond is a toxicity mechanism of the Vibrio cholerae MARTX toxin. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. 105, 18537–18542 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Oefner, C. & Suck, D. Crystallographic refinement and structure of DNase1 at 2 Å resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 192, 605–632 (1986).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pahari, S., Sun, L., Basu, S. & Alexov, E. DelPhiPKa: Including salt in the calculations and enabling polar residues to titrate. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 86, 1277–1283 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Chen, W.-J. et al. Probing the catalytic mechanism of bovine pancreatic deoxyribonuclease I by chemical rescue. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 352, 689–696 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Stollar, E. J., Lin, H., Davidson, A. R. & Forman-Kay, J. D. Differential dynamic engagement within 24 SH3 domain: Peptide complexes revealed by co-linear chemical shift perturbation analysis. PLoS ONE 7, e51282 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Shen, Y. et al. Consistent blind protein structure generation from NMR chemical shift data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105, 4685–4690 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Schneidman-Duhovny, D., Hammel, M., Tainer, J. A. & Sali, A. FoXS, FoXSDock and MultiFoXS: Single-state and multi-state structural modeling of proteins and their complexes based on SAXS profiles. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W424–W429 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Svergun, D. I. & Koch, M. H. J. Small-angle scattering studies of biological macromolecules in solution. Rep. Progress Phys. 66, 1735–1782 (2003).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Raran-Kurussi, S. & Waugh, D. S. The ability to enhance the solubility of its fusion partners is an intrinsic property of maltose-binding protein but their folding is either spontaneous or chaperone-mediated. PLoS ONE 7, e49589 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sheils, C. A. et al. Actin filaments mediate DNA fiber formation in chronic inflammatory airway disease. Am. J. Pathol. 148, 919–927 (1996).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bakker, E. M. et al. Improved treatment response to dornase alfa in cystic fibrosis patients using controlled inhalation. Eur. Respiratory J. 38, 1328–1335 (2011).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Delfino, D. et al. Actin-resistant Dnase1L2 as a potential therapeutics for CF lung disease. Biomolecules 11, 410 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Westra, H.-J. et al. Fine-mapping and functional studies highlight potential causal variants for rheumatoid arthritis and type 1 diabetes. Nat. Genet. 50, 1366–1374 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Mayes, M. D. et al. Immunochip analysis identifies multiple susceptibility loci for systemic sclerosis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 94, 47–61 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chen, W.-J. Biological functions of the disulfides in bovine pancreatic deoxyribonuclease. Protein Sci. 13, 875–883 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Shi, G., Abbott, K. N., Wu, W., Salter, R. D. & Keyel, P. A. Dnase1L3 regulates inflammasome-dependent cytokine secretion. Front. Immunol. 8, https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00522 (2017).
Ullal, A. J. et al. Microparticles as antigenic targets of antibodies to DNA and nucleosomes in systemic lupus erythematosus. J. Autoimmun. 36, 173–180 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Majka, J., Alford, B., Ausio, J., Finn, R. M. & McMurray, C. T. ATP hydrolysis by RAD50 protein switches MRE11 enzyme from endonuclease to exonuclease. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 2328–2341 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pagano, J. M., Clingman, C. C. & Ryder, S. P. Quantitative approaches to monitor protein-nucleic acid interactions using fluorescent probes. RNA 17, 14–20 (2010).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Afonine, P. V. et al. Towards automated crystallographic structure refinement with phenix.refine. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 68, 352–367 (2012).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126–2132 (2004).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Delaglio, F. et al. NMRPipe: A multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes. J. Biomolecular NMR 6, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00197809 (1995).
Vranken, W. F. et al. The CCPN data model for NMR spectroscopy: Development of a software pipeline. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 59, 687–696 (2005).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Venters, R. A., II Bennett, T. F., Fierke, C. A. & Spicer, L. D. Characterizing the use of perdeuteration in NMR studies of large proteins:13C,15N and1H assignments of human carbonic anhydrase II. J. Mol. Biol. 264, 1101–1116 (1996).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bax, A., Clore, G. & Gronenborn, A. M. ¹H-¹H correlation via isotropic mixing of¹³C magnetization, a new three-dimensional approach for assigning¹H and ¹³C spectra of¹³C-enriched proteins. J. Magn. Resonance (1969) 88, 425–431 (1990).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Shimotakahara, S. et al. NMR structural analysis of an analog of an intermediate formed in the rate-determining step of one pathway in the oxidative folding of bovine pancreatic Ribonuclease A: Automated analysis of¹H,¹³C, and ¹⁵N resonance assignments for wild-type and [C65S, C72S] mutant forms. Biochemistry 36, 6915–6929 (1997).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ying, J., Delaglio, F., Torchia, D. A. & Bax, A. Sparse multidimensional iterative lineshape-enhanced (SMILE) reconstruction of both non-uniformly sampled and conventional NMR data. J. Biomol. NMR 68, 101–118 (2016).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Svergun, D. I. Determination of the regularization parameter in indirect-transform methods using perceptual criteria. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 25, 495–503 (1992).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Manalastas-Cantos, K. et al. ATSAS 3.0: expanded functionality and new tools for small-angle scattering data analysis. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 54, 343–355 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Webb, B. & Sali, A. Comparative protein structure modeling using MODELLER. Curr. Protocols Bioinform. 54, https://doi.org/10.1002/cpbi.3 (2016).
Jo, S., Kim, T., Iyer, V. G. & Im, W. CHARMM-GUI: A web-based graphical user interface for CHARMM. J. Comput. Chem. 29, 1859–1865 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Grant, B. J., Rodrigues, A. P. C., ElSawy, K. M., McCammon, J. A. & Caves, L. S. D. Bio3d: an r package for the comparative analysis of protein structures. Bioinformatics 22, 2695–2696 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Anandakrishnan, R., Aguilar, B. & Onufriev, A. V. H++3.0: automating pK prediction and the preparation of biomolecular structures for atomistic molecular modeling and simulations. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, W537–W541 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Myers, J., Grothaus, G., Narayanan, S. & Onufriev, A. A simple clustering algorithm can be accurate enough for use in calculations of pKs in macromolecules. Proteins Struct Funct. Bioinform. 63, 928–938 (2006).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Gordon, J. C. et al. H++: a server for estimating pKas and adding missing hydrogens to macromolecules. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, W368–W371 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Worrall, A. F. & Connolly, B. A. The chemical synthesis of a gene coding for bovine pancreatic DNase I and its cloning and expression in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 265, 21889–21895 (1990).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

This publication was supported by the Lupus Research Alliance, The CH Foundation, the Lubbock Lupus Group, and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (1R35GM128906; MPL) and a seed grant provided by the TTUHSC Center for Membrane Protein Research. Use of the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, is supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-76SF00515. The SSRL Structural Molecular Biology Program is supported by the DOE Office of Biological and Environmental Research, and by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P30GM133894). The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of funding agencies, including the LRA, NIGMS or NIH. The authors acknowledge the Texas Tech University College of Arts and Sciences Microscopy for flow cytometry and the High-Performance Computing Center (HPCC) at Texas Tech University for providing computational resources that have contributed to the research results reported within this paper. http://www.hpcc.ttu.edu The authors also thank Dr. Faraz Harsini for help with the initial Dnase1L3 purification.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Dept of Cell Physiology and Molecular Biophysics, Lubbock, TX, USA
Jon J. McCord, Johanna Villarreal & R. Bryan Sutton
Texas Tech University, Dept. of Biological Sciences, Lubbock, TX, USA
Minal Engavale, Britney Mapp & Peter A. Keyel
Texas Tech University, Dept. of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Lubbock, TX, USA
Elahe Masoumzadeh & Michael P. Latham

Authors

Jon J. McCord
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Minal Engavale
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Elahe Masoumzadeh
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Johanna Villarreal
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Britney Mapp
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Michael P. Latham
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Peter A. Keyel
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
R. Bryan Sutton
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

P.A.K., R.B.S., and M.P.L. conceived the experiment(s), J.J.M., M.E., E.M., J.V., B.M. conducted the experiment(s), R.B.S., P.A.K., and M.P.L. analyzed the results. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Bryan Sutton.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Authors P.A.K., R.B.S., and J.J.M. are inventors on pending TTUS patent applications (US17763913, EP20874456.5) relating to certain research described in this article. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Biology thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Gene Chong. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Peer Review File

Supplemental Material

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data 1–13

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCord, J.J., Engavale, M., Masoumzadeh, E. et al. Structural features of Dnase1L3 responsible for serum antigen clearance. Commun Biol 5, 825 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-03755-5

Download citation

Received: 09 November 2021
Accepted: 22 July 2022
Published: 16 August 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-03755-5

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.