Allometric, metabolic, and biomechanical theories are the critical foundations for scientifically deciphering plant forms. Their concrete laws, however, are found to deviate for plenty of plant specimens. This phenomenon has not been extensively studied, due to technical restrictions. This bottleneck now can be overcome by the state-of-the-art three-dimensional (3D) mapping technologies, such as fine-scale terrestrial laser scanning. On these grounds, we proposed to reexamine the basic theories regarding plant forms, and then, we case validated the feasibility of upgrading them into 3D modes. As an in-time enlightening of 3D revolutionizing the related basic subject, our theoretical prospect further sorted out the potential challenges as the cutting points for advancing its future exploration, which may enable 3D reconstruction of the basic theories of plant forms and even boost life science.
Introduction: The established basic theories of plant forms show law deviations
In plant science, form, also termed appearance, shape, architecture, structure, or morphology, has long been followed with wide interest1,2—ranging from its measurement3 to its attribution4. For quantitative characterization and ecological analysis of its diversity and development, scientists have creatively developed multiple basic theories5. Allometric6, metabolic7, and biomechanical8 approaches can collectively outline the characteristics of plant forms. Such already-established basic theories have been able to generally shed light on the underlying patterns and reasons how and why plants show their distinctive forms9.
The allometric theory, alias the allometric scaling theory, can characterize the size relations of the body parts that constitute the integrative forms of plants10,11,12 and facilitate metering the different properties of plants in a relatively easy way. The metabolic theory, also termed the metabolic scaling theory, is aimed at quantitatively deriving the scaling of metabolic rate as a function of body sizes and environmental factors (e.g., in the scaling forms based on Cauchy’s theorems)13,14,15,16, in favour of learning the inner processes of plants through their forms. As for the biomechanical theory, it examines the forms and functions of plants in a mechanical way17,18 such as explaining the strategies used by plants for avoiding windbreaks, being self-supporting, and retaining their growth habits19.
These basic theories on the apparent structure, internal physiology, and external adaptability of plants, in principle, can elucidate their respective effects in modulating plants to grow into specific forms6,20,21,22. Flexible combinations of these theories have also been validated for explaining the multifold aspects of form-related characteristics for diverse plant species23. For generalizing and characterizing such functions, many “universal”-purposed models such as the Geometric Similarity model24, the West/Brown/Enquist (WBE) model13, and the Auto-Stress-regarded Bending model25 have been developed. Such models can act as bridges for probing why the anatomical and physiological scaling exponents of plants scale as quarter-powers of mass, such as the popular WBE model performing with the scaling exponent = 3/4 for gross photosynthetic rate, metabolic rate, and resource use26.
However, for many species with complex forms, specific laws under the frameworks of these basic theories have been found with various deviations, which may be caused by plant species differences27, plant self-shading28, crown ratio influencing29, or plant-plant interaction30. For example, scientists observed that the scaling exponent of 3/4 for the metabolic relationships is not common for some woody plant species31. Till now, it is still uncertain whether such law deviations are special phenomena or general modes for plants32. The reason is the lack of systematic studies focusing on this question19. This shortage is rooted in another technical limitation that is typically unavoidable in traditional plant measurements, namely, almost no efficient techniques for in-situ mapping the full structure of plants33.
The state-of-the-art mapping technologies supply a new perspective
The state-of-the-art mapping technologies such as terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) can survey and represent plant forms in a three-dimensional (3D) manner34. This is illustrated by the point cloud in Fig. 1a and the multi-cylinders-based branch modelling in Fig. 1b, respectively. This advantage can bring about a 3D revolution in how we look at trees35 and tree communities36. By extension, TLS can supply a new 3D perspective on the complex structures of plants and their communities. This reasoning is rooted in the fact that TLS has proved to be able to support deriving crown structural properties37, classifying species38, and estimating biomass39, which all serve as the foundations for a comprehensive understanding of plant forms. So far, these endeavours were mainly dedicated to bringing changes to the traditional plant phenotyping fields or providing supplementary points to the existing knowledge base40,41,42, not paying attention to the fundamental scientific questions that are explicitly involved in the basic theories of plant forms. Still, the scarce emergences of TLS-based attempts to gain further insight are inspiring, and we review these below.
For the allometric basic theory, a couple of studies based on TLS characterizing plants have detected its law deviations or even totally new laws in some specific scenarios. As a case study indicated, the conventional allometric equations are inadequate for estimating the biomass of a temperate species-mixed forest, while TLS-based tree stem modelling can serve as a potential solution of deriving non-destructive allometric equations for updating allometry and reducing the uncertainties in landscape-scale biomass estimations43. TLS was also used in an attempt to quantify the allometric variations of Quercus mongolica in semi-arid forests, and its derived allometric situation of low height but large canopy (as illustrated in Fig. 1c) matched just a low percentile of the derivations from the common Dynamic Global Vegetation Models (DGVMs)44. More such TLS-based studies exploring plant allometric modes and determinants would have implications for supporting from plant hydraulics analysis to DGVM improvement, and include 3D reexamining the allometric basic theory on plant forms.
In regard to the metabolic basic theory, some plans based on the TLS-mapped plant data have been proposed for exploring its new performance laws in special situations. As illustrated in Fig. 1d, the metabolic scaling laws of some plant species45,46 proved to show deviations from the simulations based on the WBE model47. To explain such deviations, it is needed to re-check the physiological assumptions regarding how the fractions and activities of the metabolically active tissues vary in organisms, and exploiting the key sources of this uncertainty relies on an accurate assessment of the surface areas of relatively smaller branches and twigs that make a disproportionate contribution to the total woody surface area36. TLS is applicable to finishing this basic task, and hence, it was supposed that TLS can help to test the existing allometric assumptions and give rise to new significant insights36. This hypothesis was verified by the finding that the TLS-measured scaling exponents of branch radius scaling ratio α and branch length scaling ratio β proved to diverge from the theoretical exponents of the WBE models48. Therefore, it was argued that TLS can be adopted as a useful tool for making comprehensive studies of plant biophysical processes and metabolic theories in ecology49, certainly covering the metabolic basic theory on plant forms.
As for the biomechanical basic theory, some endeavours based on the TLS-collected plant data have detected novel laws of biomechanical modes in some situations. As compared in Fig. 1e, the ecological effect of tree thinning can affect its biomechanical performance in terms of lean angle50. However, more comprehensive explorations of plant biomechanical properties, in terms of four typical biomechanical traits (such as two safety traits against wind and self-buckling, and two motricity traits involving how to sustain an upright position—tropic motion velocity and posture control)19, require more detailed information about plant forms. For this need, TLS has proved to be a potential solution for deriving plant structural features38, and such parameters can inspire more studies on plant biomechanical natures. A representative TLS-based biomechanical study proved to generate the answers to the specific questions on plant structure-wind ecological interactions, such as what decides critical wind speeds and whether trade-offs lie between such speeds and plant growth rates51. Such applicability of TLS can no doubt be extended to 3D reexamining the biomechanical basic theory on plant forms.
3D reexamining the basic theories of plant forms: allometric case study
As it is not sufficient to only propose the feasibility of 3D reexamining the basic theories of plant forms, we performed an allometric case study. Specifically, we proposed a new concept of 3D allometry instead of its traditional mode, as illustrated by the principle transition from Fig. 2a, b. The theoretical foundation of making such a proposal is that growth direction, in addition to the often used parameter of its magnitude, can better reflect the physiological, biomechanical, and ecological properties of plant organs, such as their orientation preferences in pressure response during their growths50. The definition of 3D allometry is that for a plant, its stem, branches, and leaves are characterized by introducing vector feature parameters, instead of scalar ones generally used under the traditional allometric theoretical framework. The scaling between such two vector parameters is valued by both the magnitude quantifying the comparative relation between their scalar components in any direction and the orientation information of that direction. The resulting 3D allometric theoretical framework can support breaking the aimed bottleneck—characterizing 3D plant forms and boosting their 3D allometric studies.
The validation of 3D allometry was conducted by running a case study of three woody plant species—eight Sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus), eight Ash (Fraxinus excelsior), and four Beech (Fagus sylvatica, 104) trees in the Wytham Woods, UK52, with their 3D point clouds collected by fine-scale TLS. The allometric laws between their trunks and first-level branches were derived, and a novel finding emerged. Namely, for the specimens of Sycamore and Beech trees, the diameters of trunk below branches are more highly correlated with the lengths of the horizontal components of the first-level branches than themselves (Fig. 2c, d). Note that such an allometric analysis of the horizontal components of plant branches was almost impossible under the traditional allometric theoretical framework, testifying to the validity of our proposed concept. This finding, here regardless of its attribution, suggests the promising future of 3D allometry. In a theoretically broader sense, this world is intrinsically 3D, and thus, why not apply 3D allometry for plants?
The answer is clear. This conceptual proposal can inspire the community to develop new principles, models, and methods for characterizing and exploring 3D allometries in plants. The resulting solutions may more explicitly tackle the uncertainties such as the scaling exponents varying from less than 2/3 to larger than 132 for different plant species and improve the situation regarding allometric scaling exponents with regard to plant species growing with complex forms53. As for how to 3D characterize such forms, this principle challenge in the traditional allometric theoretical system may no longer be a problem. In such circumstances, we can derive 3D allometric laws as the ground-truth data for validating the scientific inferences from plant biophysics32 to plant physiology54, since their accumulated ecological effects on plants, in the viewpoint of plant development55, result in the measured plant forms. In a nutshell, 3D allometry can stimulate the re-cognition of plant form-structural modes and re-thinking about allometry-based plant form-structural basic theories.
With regard to what and how environmental forces influence plant form-structural modes, the proposed 3D allometry can open a vector-feature-based ecological way of seeking the answers. As illustrated in Fig. 1b, the proposed vector feature parameters can adapt to the analyses of the ecological relationships between the growth forms of plants and the directional effects of their environmental forces such as solar radiances55 and wind fields56. Thus, plant structural ecology can be characterized with more orientation details, potentially solving the controversies arising from traditional explorations of the relationships between allometric trajectories and environmental stresses57. This potential may facilitate refining the ecological analyses of plant postures at the organ scale and refreshing the ecological inferences about plant structures at the individual to ecosystem levels. This advantage can help to break the bottleneck in bridging the gaps between the various scales of plant structural ecology58. In other words, the 3D allometric concept can project a 3D upgrading of plant structural ecology.
Beyond structural ecology, a key question is how plants adapt themselves to environmental forces to display their form-structural modes. The 3D allometric concept can pave the way for more comprehensively exploring the related form-structural-functional links. Under this 3D allometric principle framework, the pitfalls in traditional analyses of biomass allocation modes in plants59 can be addressed, and more specific 3D patterns of biomass allocations in branches of various inclination angles can be reflected. Such specified 3D allometric laws may mean that it is quite possible to quell the traditional allometry-derived debates53. Further, 3D allometry may bring breakthroughs to the often-assumed laws on plant form54, re-understand the basic theories on plant allometry13, and even open the totally new fields on plant structure. In all, the proposed 3D allometric concept may start 3D revolutions of plant form-structural-functional sciences in the future.
3D upgrading the basic theories of plant forms is of potential but challenging
This allometric case study suggested that 3D reexamining the basic theories of plant forms is of high potential for promoting their 3D upgrading and, thereby, disclosing more secrets about plant forms. This potential is valid not only for the three cardinal kinds of basic theories as considered in this study but also many other kinds aiming at the different aspects involving plant forms. Such aspects may include plant physiology20, biophysics34, biochemistry15, and biosystematics5. Their basic theories after 3D reexaminations will bring critical revolutions to the related fields as well, and this will be of considerable implications for from refreshing our knowledge on plant forms2 to updating the foundation for global ecosystem understanding44, even possibly projecting a new field.
The identified potential, however, does not mean that stepping forward from 3D reexamining to 3D theorizing is easy, as this process will be challenging. The challenges include more than the technical gaps35,36 between TLS data collections and the possible laws of the new 3D allometric, metabolic, and biomechanical basic theories. How to derive such potential laws may be the key challenges in this theoretical-level analysis. This can be mitigated by re-asking the questions that have been unclear under the traditional frameworks of the allometric, metabolic, and biomechanical basic theories of plant forms. For example, can biomechanical or optimal allocation theories better make accurate estimates of reproductive allometries for special plant species60? How is it possible to balance the weight of allometric scaling and resource limitation in predicting maximum heights and other features of plants61? Can the changes in plant structure allometry serve as the evidence of plant “liberations”62? To what degree can plant morphologic plasticity explain the law deviations from the metabolic scaling theory in special situations63. On the other hand, how can biomechanical performance constrain plant forms64? How can biomechanical design decide the long-term stability of plants in terms of the balance between weight increase and gravitropic reaction25? How can the common framework of structural mechanics account for the evolution of the whole geometry due to plant growth processes65? What can theoretically cause their diversities40? Collectively, the possible challenges may involve dealing with plant structural traits from the perspective of their forming mechanisms and coordinating the derived laws between the different kinds of new basic theories.
The challenges discussed above indicate that the existing basic theories of plant forms are far from being perfect, particularly for woody plant species that commonly grow with complex structures. However, the compilation of these challenges is useful for figuring out the potential cutting points for launching the future studies in this direction.
Prospect: towards 3D basic theories of plant forms
To upgrade the basic theories of plant forms to 3D will ultimately lead to their 3D versions. This prospect is based on its viability in principle, as evidenced by Fig. 3, which illustrates its physical demand and mechanistic foundation. Substantially, developing 3D basic theories of plant forms is equivalent to returning to their 3D growth space. At the same time, the process of plant growth is in a 3D manner, ranging from carbon capture, carbon allocation, to carbon sequestration66. These physiological functions working within a 3D vascular structure engender 3D apparent patterns of metabolic scaling, biomechanical coordinating, and allometric scaling, integrally performing with coherent inner relationships. As specifically explained in Fig. 3, this facilitates systematically 3D reexamining and -reconstructing the basic theories of plant forms, even to the structure of plant collection67. The total picture in Fig. 3 provides an instructive framework for developing 3D basic theories of plant forms.
Overall, this study proposes the state-of-the-art in-situ 3D mapping technologies such as fine-scale TLS, for 3D reexamining the basic theories of plant forms. This work may promote more future explorations, particularly on plants with more diverse forms in the wild, towards 3D basic theories of plant forms. This trend may bring 3D critical changes and even breakthroughs to the scientific cognitions of plant forms and, in a broader sense, biological forms. All such merits will be of fundamental significance further for revealing more botanical and biological mechanisms for advancing life science from the bottom up.
Cremers, G. Presence of 10 models of plant architecture in Euphorbes-Malgaches. Comptes Rendus Hebd. des. Seances de. L Academie des. Sci. Ser. D. 281, 1575–1578 (1975).
Balduzzi, M. et al. Reshaping plant biology: qualitative and quantitative descriptors for plant morphology. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 117 (2017).
Albert, C. H. et al. A multi-trait approach reveals the structure and the relative importance of intra- vs. interspecific variability in plant traits. Funct. Ecol. 24, 1192–1201 (2010).
Farnsworth, K. D. & Niklas, K. J. Theories of optimization, form and function in branching architecture in plants. Funct. Ecol. 9, 355–363 (1995).
Enquist, B. J. et al. in Advances in Ecological Research (eds Pawar, S.et al.), 249–318 (Academic Press, 2015).
Niklas, K. J. & Spatz, H. C. Allometric theory and the mechanical stability of large trees: proof and conjecture. Am. J. Bot. 93, 824–828 (2006).
Price, C. A. et al. The metabolic theory of ecology: prospects and challenges for plant biology. N. Phytol. 188, 696–710 (2010).
Martone, P. T. et al. Mechanics without muscle: biomechanical inspiration from the plant world. Integr. Comp. Biol. 50, 888–907 (2010).
West, G. B. & Brown, J. H. The origin of allometric scaling laws in biology from genomes to ecosystems: towards a quantitative unifying theory of biological structure and organization. J. Exp. Biol. 208, 1575–1592 (2005).
Enquist, B. J. Universal scaling in tree and vascular plant allometry: toward a general quantitative theory linking plant form and function from cells to ecosystems. Tree Physiol. 22, 1045–1064 (2002).
Anfodillo, T. et al. An allometry-based approach for understanding forest structure, predicting tree-size distribution and assessing the degree of disturbance. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 280, 20122375 (2013).
Duncanson, L. I., Dubayah, R. O. & Enquist, B. J. Assessing the general patterns of forest structure: quantifying tree and forest allometric scaling relationships in the United States. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 24, 1465–1475 (2015).
West, G. B., Brown, J. H. & Enquist, B. J. The fourth dimension of life: Fractal geometry and allometric scaling of organisms. Science 284, 1677–1679 (1999).
Winter, C. L. & Tartakovsky, D. M. Theoretical foundation for conductivity scaling. Geophys. Res. Lett. 28, 4367–4369 (2001).
Reich, P. B. et al. Universal scaling of respiratory metabolism, size and nitrogen in plants. Nature 439, 457–461 (2006).
Choi, S. et al. Application of the metabolic scaling theory and water–energy balance equation to model large‐scale patterns of maximum forest canopy height. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 25, 1428–1442 (2016).
Osler, G. H. R., West, P. W. & Downes, G. M. Effects of bending stress on taper and growth of stems of young Eucalyptus regnans trees. Trees 10, 239–246 (1996).
Berthier, S. et al. Irregular heartwood formation in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait): consequences for biomechanical and hydraulic tree functioning. Ann. Bot. 87, 19–25 (2001).
Fournier, M. et al. Integrative biomechanics for tree ecology: beyond wood density and strength. J. Exp. Bot. 64, 4793–4815 (2013).
Sone, K., Noguchi, K. & Terashima, I. Dependency of branch diameter growth in young Acer trees on light availability and shoot elongation. Tree Physiol. 25, 39–48 (2005).
Anten, N. P. & Schieving, F. The role of wood mass density and mechanical constraints in the economy of tree architecture. Am. Nat. 175, 250–260 (2010).
Jelonek, T. et al. The biomechanical formation of trees (Prace Naukowe, Doniesienia, Komunikaty, 2019).
Muller‐Landau, H. C. et al. Testing metabolic ecology theory for allometric scaling of tree size, growth and mortality in tropical forests. Ecol. Lett. 9, 575–588 (2006).
McMahon, T. A. & Kronauer, R. E. Tree structures: deducing the principle of mechanical design. J. Theor. Biol. 59, 443–466 (1976).
Alméras, T. & Fournier, M. Biomechanical design and long-term stability of trees: morphological and wood traits involved in the balance between weight increase and the gravitropic reaction. J. Theor. Biol. 256, 370–381 (2009).
West, G. B., Brown, J. H. & Enquist, B. J. A general model for the origin of allometric scaling laws in biology. Science 276, 122–126 (1997).
Mäkelä, A. & Valentine, H. T. Crown ratio influences allometric scaling in trees. Ecol 87, 2967–2972 (2006).
Duursma, R. A. et al. Self‐shading affects allometric scaling in trees. Funct. Ecol. 24, 723–730 (2010).
Pretzsch, H. & Dieler, J. Evidence of variant intra-and interspecific scaling of tree crown structure and relevance for allometric theory. Oecologia 169, 637–649 (2012).
Lin, Y. et al. Plant interactions alter the predictions of metabolic scaling theory. PloS One 8, e57612 (2013).
Cheng, D. et al. Scaling relationship between tree respiration rates and biomass. Biol. Lett. 6, 715–717 (2010).
Ogawa, K. Scaling relations based on the geometric and metabolic theories in woody plant species: A review. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40, 125480 (2019).
Risto, S. et al. Functional–structural plant models: a growing paradigm for plant studies. Ann. Bot. 114, 599–603 (2014).
Jackson, T. et al. Finite element analysis of trees in the wind based on terrestrial laser scanning data. Agric. Meteorol. 265, 137–144 (2019).
Disney, M. Terrestrial LiDAR: a three‐dimensional revolution in how we look at trees. N. Phytol. 222, 1736–1741 (2019).
Malhi, Y. et al. New perspectives on the ecology of tree structure and tree communities through terrestrial laser scanning. Interface Focus 8, 20170052 (2018).
Bayer, D., Seifert, S. & Pretzsch, H. Structural crown properties of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica [L.]) in mixed versus pure stands revealed by terrestrial laser scanning. Trees 27, 1035–1047 (2013).
Lin, Y. & Herold, M. Tree species classification based on explicit tree structure feature parameters derived from static terrestrial laser scanning data. Agric. Meteorol. 216, 105–114 (2016).
Tanago, J. G. et al. Estimation of above‐ground biomass of large tropical trees with terrestrial LiDAR. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 223–234 (2018).
Takoudjou, S. M. et al. Using terrestrial laser scanning data to estimate large tropical trees biomass and calibrate allometric models: A comparison with traditional destructive approach. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 905–916 (2018).
Dassot, M., Fournier, M. & Deleuze, C. Assessing the scaling of the tree branch diameters frequency distribution with terrestrial laser scanning: methodological framework and issues. Ann. Sci. 76, 66 (2019).
Klockow, P. A. et al. Allometry and structural volume change of standing dead southern pine trees using non-destructive terrestrial LiDAR. Remote Sens. Environ. 241, 111729 (2020).
Stovall, A. E., Anderson-Teixeira, K. J. & Shugart, H. H. Assessing terrestrial laser scanning for developing non-destructive biomass allometry. Ecol. Manag. 427, 217–229 (2018).
Dai, J. et al. Drought-modulated allometric patterns of trees in semi-arid forests. Commun. Biol. 3, 1–8 (2020).
Ogawa, K., Hagihara, A. & Hozumi, K. Growth analysis of a seedling community of Chamaecyparis obtusa. VI. Estimation of individual gross primary production by the summation method. In Transactions of the 30th Meeting of Chubu Branch of Japanese Forestry Society, 179–181 (Honda Kiyoshi, 1985).
Yokota, T. & Hagihara, A. Dependence of the aboveground CO2 exchange rate on tree size in field-grown hinoki cypress (Chamaecyparis obtusa). J. Plant Res. 109, 177–184 (1996).
Enquist, B. J. et al. Biological scaling: does the exception prove the rule? Nature 445, E9–E10 (2007).
Lau, A. et al. Estimating architecture-based metabolic scaling exponents of tropical trees using terrestrial LiDAR and 3D modelling. Ecol. Manag. 439, 132–145 (2019).
Li, Y. et al. Retrieval of tree branch architecture attributes from terrestrial laser scan data using a Laplacian algorithm. Agric. Meteorol. 284, 107874 (2020).
Noyer, E. et al. Biomechanical control of beech pole verticality (Fagus sylvatica) before and after thinning: theoretical modelling and ground‐truth data using terrestrial LiDAR. Am. J. Bot. 106, 187–198 (2019).
Jackson, T. et al. A new architectural perspective on wind damage in a natural forest. Front. Glob. Chang. 1, 13 (2019).
Jackson, T. Strain Measurements on 21 Trees in Wytham Woods, UK. NERC Environmental Information Data Centre. https://doi.org/10.5285/533d87d3-48c1-4c6e-9f2f-fda273ab45bc (2018).
Kozłowski, J. & Konarzewski, M. Is West, Brown and Enquist’s model of allometric scaling mathematically correct and biologically relevant? Funct. Ecol. 18, 283–289 (2004).
Kleiber, M. Body size and metabolic rate. Physiol. Rev. 27, 511–541 (1947).
Hay, M. J. M. et al. Branching responses of a plagiotropic clonal herb to localised incidence of light simulating that reflected from vegetation. Oecologia 127, 185–190 (2001).
Cordero, R. A., Fetcher, N. & Voltzow, J. Effects of wind on the allometry of two species of plants in an elfin cloud forest. Biotropica 39, 177–185 (2010).
Anfodillo, T. et al. Allometric trajectories and “stress”: a quantitative approach. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 1681 (2016).
Louarn, G. & Song, Y. Two decades of functional-structural plant modelling: now addressing fundamental questions in systems biology and predictive ecology. Ann. Bot. 126, 501–509 (2020).
Poorter, H. & Sack, L. Pitfalls and possibilities in the analysis of biomass allocation patterns in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 3, 259 (2012).
Thomas, S. C. Reproductive allometry in Malaysian rain forest trees: biomechanics versus optimal allocation. Evol. Ecol. 10, 517–530 (1996).
Kempes, C. P. et al. Predicting maximum tree heights and other traits from allometric scaling and resource limitations. PLoS One 6, e20551 (2011).
Blanchard, E. et al. Contrasted allometries between stem diameter, crown area, and tree height in five tropical biogeographic areas. Trees 30, 1953–1968 (2016).
Swetnam, T. L., O’Connor, C. D. & Lynch, A. M. Tree morphologic plasticity explains deviation from metabolic scaling theory in semi-arid conifer forests, southwestern USA. PLoS One 11, e0157582 (2016).
Loehle, C. Biomechanical constraints on tree architecture. Trees 30, 2061–2070 (2016).
Guillon, T., Dumont, Y. & Fourcaud, T. Numerical methods for the biomechanics of growing trees. Comput. Math. Appl. 64, 289–309 (2012).
Olson, M. E., Rosell, J. A., Muñoz, S. Z. & Castorena, M. Carbon limitation, stem growth rate and the biomechanical cause of Corner’s rules. Ann. Bot. 122, 583–592 (2018).
West, G. B., Enquist, B. J. & Brown, J. H. A general quantitative theory of forest structure and dynamics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 7040–7045 (2009).
This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31870531 and 32171782).
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information
Communications Biology thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Quan-Xing Liu and Christina Karlsson Rosenthal.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Lin, Y., Hyyppä, J. Towards 3D basic theories of plant forms. Commun Biol 5, 703 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-03652-x