Correction to: Communications Biology https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-0892-6, published online 9 April 2020.

In the original published version of the article, the Methods section entitled “Statistics and reproducibility” incorrectly stated that the coefficient of relationship between individuals in the HCP sample was computed using the KING method. However, the coefficient of relationship was computed using self-reported twin status data. The error has been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the paper.