New insight into the molecular mechanism of colour differentiation among floral segments in orchids

Li, Bai-Jun; Zheng, Bao-Qiang; Wang, Jie-Yu; Tsai, Wen-Chieh; Lu, Hsiang-Chia; Zou, Long-Hai; Wan, Xiao; Zhang, Di-Yang; Qiao, Hong-Juan; Liu, Zhong-Jian; Wang, Yan

doi:10.1038/s42003-020-0821-8

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 28 February 2020

New insight into the molecular mechanism of colour differentiation among floral segments in orchids

Communications Biology volume 3, Article number: 89 (2020) Cite this article

11k Accesses
67 Citations
2 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

An unbalanced pigment distribution among the sepal and petal segments results in various colour patterns of orchid flowers. Here, we explored this type of mechanism of colour pattern formation in flowers of the Cattleya hybrid ‘KOVA’. Our study showed that pigment accumulation displayed obvious spatiotemporal specificity in the flowers and was likely regulated by three R2R3-MYB transcription factors. Before flowering, RcPAP1 was specifically expressed in the epichile to activate the anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway, which caused substantial cyanin accumulation and resulted in a purple-red colour. After flowering, the expression of RcPAP2 resulted in a low level of cyanin accumulation in the perianths and a pale pink colour, whereas RcPCP1 was expressed only in the hypochile, where it promoted α-carotene and lutein accumulation and resulted in a yellow colour. Additionally, we propose that the spatiotemporal expression of different combinations of AP3- and AGL6-like genes might participate in KOVA flower colour pattern formation.

CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutation reveals a role for AN4 rather than DPL in regulating venation formation in the corolla tube of Petunia hybrida

Article Open access 01 June 2021

Bin Zhang, Xiaojing Xu, … Yulong Guo

MYB repressors and MBW activation complex collaborate to fine-tune flower coloration in Freesia hybrida

Article Open access 27 July 2020

Yueqing Li, Xiaotong Shan, … Xiang Gao

CmBES1 is a regulator of boundary formation in chrysanthemum ray florets

Article Open access 01 August 2020

Peilei Cheng, Yanan Liu, … Jiafu Jiang

Introduction

Flower colour patterns are generally shaped by colour differentiation in the petal segments and can help plants attract pollinators^1,2, in addition to being an important ornamental trait³. Therefore, the exploration of the mechanism of colour differentiation is valuable for understanding plant evolution and breeding novel ornamental lines. For most species, the sepals are just uniformly green and do not contribute to interesting colour patterns. Orchids are exceptional in that the sepals and the lip are usually as colourful as the petals, which results in an unbalanced pigment distribution among different segments of the perianths and lip to show various flower colour patterns. Although numerous studies have reported the mechanisms of pigment biosynthesis in flowers^4,5,6,7, the formation of colour patterns by different types of pigments among the sepal and petal segments has yet to be systematically described. Rhyncholaeliocattleya Beauty Girl ‘KOVA’ (KOVA) is a well-known ornamental orchid cultivar; its flowers are relatively large and exhibit pale pink perianths (sepal/petal), a purple-red epichile and a yellow hypochile (Fig. 1a). The red and yellow colours are determined by anthocyanins and carotenoids, respectively (Fig. 1b). These characteristics make KOVA a suitable target for addressing the interesting and important question of the mechanism of colour pattern formation.

**Fig. 1: Characteristics of *Rhyncholaeliocattleya* Beauty Girl ‘KOVA’ (KOVA) flowers.**

Anthocyanins and carotenoids are widely distributed pigments in flowers. The anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway (ABP) is highly conserved and has been well studied in plants⁶. As crucial ABP regulators, the R2R3-MYB transcription factors can regulate the expression of structural genes to influence flower colour formation^{8,9,10,11,12,13}. In Orchidaceae, some R2R3-MYBs have been verified to activate ABP structural genes to promote anthocyanin accumulation in Phalaenopsis⁵, Oncidium¹⁴ and Dendrobium¹⁵ flowers. Carotenoids are another important type of pigment that contributes to colouration ranging from yellow to red in plant tissues^16,17. However, the R2R3-MYBs involved in the regulation of the floral carotenoid biosynthesis pathway (CBP) are not well known. Recently, RCP1 (R2R3-MYB) was suggested to activate CBP structural genes and increase carotenoid accumulation in Mimulus lewisii flowers¹⁸.

The shapes and colour patterns of flowers are used as visual standards of flower organ identity. According to the ABCDE model, different combinations of MADS-box genes determine flower organ identity¹⁹. B-class genes, including APETALA3 (AP3) and PISTILLATA (PI), and E-class SEPALLATA (SEP)-like genes are considered to participate in petal formation^20,21,22. Many studies have shown that the overexpression or silencing of B-/E-class MADS-box genes can change the shape of petals^20,21,22,23. Notably, as the transcription levels of these MADS-box genes change, petal colours are also altered^{23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30}. Previous studies have indicated that combinatorial protein interaction networks among the members of the B-class, E-class and AGL6 clades during orchid floral development might be responsible for the evolutionary novelties of orchid flowers^24,31,32,33. Recently, the P code was proposed, indicating that OAP3-1 and OAGL6-1 are required for perianth formation, whereas OAP3-2 and OAGL6-2 are necessary for lip development in orchids²³. However, little is known about the relationship between MADS-box genes and flower colour pattern formation in orchids and other plants.

In this study, based on the identification of large-scale metabolomes, RNA-Seq sequencing, and Iso-Seq sequencing, we revealed the precise spatiotemporal characteristics of colour pattern formation during KOVA floral development. Then, we identified two R2R3-MYBs that might participate in the regulation of the ABP and one that might be involved in regulating the CBP in flowers. In addition, we propose that AP3- and AGL6-like genes might participate in colour differentiation in the perianth and lip segments based on the analysis of transcriptome data and a peloric mutant of KOVA.

Results

Morphological anatomy of KOVA flowers during development

The analysis of morphological anatomy showed that no red or yellow colouration appeared in the perianths and lip before floral development stage 2 (D2; Fig. 1c). From D2 to before D7, the colour of the perianths and hypochile changed from green to yellow green, and gradually increasing purple-red colouration appeared in the epichile. After flowering (i.e., from D7 to D8), the colour of the perianths changed from yellow green to white with pale pink; the hypochile turned yellow; and the epichile remained purple-red, but the degree of this coloration from D7 to D8 was lighter than that in previous stages. Based on the analysis of the morphological anatomy, we collected sepals, petals, epichiles, and hypochiles at D1, D4, D7 and D8, respectively, for transcriptome sequencing and metabolome identification (Fig. 1d).

Identification and quantification of pigment components

Liquid chromatography-electrospray ionisation-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS/MS) analysis identified eleven carotenoids and was used to quantify their levels in flowers at D7 and D8 (Figs. 1d and 2a). The total carotenoid content of the hypochile was higher than that of other flower segments at both stages (Fig. 2a). At D8, α-carotene and lutein were the main carotenoids in the hypochile, accounting for ~31 and 45% of the total carotenoid content, respectively. Moreover, cyanidin and the four forms of cyanin were detected in all flower segments (Fig. 2a). The total anthocyanin content of the epichile was highest at D7 and D8. Among the cyanins, the amount of cyanidin O-acetylhexoside was highest in all flower segments. Additionally, the total chlorophyll content of all segments at D7 was obviously higher than that at D8, and the total chlorophyll content in the perianths was higher than that in the epichile and hypochile at D7 (Fig. 2a). The total carotenoid, anthocyanin, and chlorophyll contents decreased in all flower segments from D7 to D8. These results suggested that cyanins produced via the ABP and lutein and α-carotene synthesised via the CBP contributed to the coloration of KOVA flowers ranging from purple-red to yellow, while chlorophyll provided green colouration.

**Fig. 2: Identification and quantification of the pigments in KOVA flowers at D7 and D8.**

Expression profile of structural genes in pigment biosynthesis pathways

Through PacBio Iso-Seq sequencing, 17.61 gigabytes (GB) of raw data were produced from two libraries (0–4 and 4–10 kb libraries), and 67,113 unique full-length transcripts (isoforms) were obtained through pipeline analysis. Moreover, 1.894 billion pairs of clean reads were produced from 48 libraries using RNA-Seq to calculate the expression level (fragments per kilobase per million, FPKM) of each isoform, with a mapping ratio of 77.04–85.99%. Additionally, the unmapped reads were de novo assembled, and 77,281 unigenes were produced.

The isoforms/unigenes involved in the ABP and CBP were screened from the transcriptome data-set, and heatmap analysis was used to illustrate the expression profiles of ABP and CBP structural genes in flower segments during floral development based on their FPKM values. The results showed that the expression of all ABP structural genes was barely detectable at D1, which is consistent with the absence of red colour in KOVA flowers (Fig. 2b). Thereafter, the expression of the structural genes involved in the ABP was strongly activated only in the epichile at D4, at which time the epichile displayed an obvious purple-red colour. Notably, all components of the ABP were expressed in the perianths and epichile at D7, although the expression level of ABP structural genes in those at D7 was lower than that in the epichile at D4. At the final stage, the expression of ABP structural genes was decreased in all segments, and the perianths and epichile displayed pale pink and lighter purple-red colouration, respectively (Fig. 1a). The dynamic expression of ABP structural genes in different segments during floral development is consistent with the morphological anatomy of the purple-red colouration that appears in the epichile before flowering and the pale pink colour that appears in the perianths after flowering (Fig. 1c). Furthermore, the ABP was strongly activated in the epichile and weakly activated in the perianths, which supported the metabolomic results showing that higher levels of cyanins accumulated in the epichile than in the perianths (Fig. 2a).

On the other hand, the expression of all CBP structural genes was downregulated in all segments at D1, except for the lycopene ε-cyclase (LCYE) and lycopene β-cyclase (LCYB; Fig. 2c). At D4, in addition to the LCYEs and LCYBs, β-carotene hydroxylase 1 (BCH1) was activated only in the hypochile, while BCH2s were expressed in all flower segments. At D7, the hypochile was yellower than the other segments, and the expression of the phytoene synthase (PSY) was obviously upregulated only in the hypochile. However, the upstream phytoene desaturase (PDS), carotenoid isomerase (CRTISO), BCH2 and P450-type β-ring hydroxylase (CYP97A3) were obviously upregulated in all segments, and the BCH1s were upregulated in the hypochile. Additionally, the expression of the LCYEs was downregulated in all segments, and the expression level of the LCYBs decreased only in the hypochile. In the final stage, only the hypochile displayed a yellow colour; all of the upstream CBP genes from the PSYs to the CRTISOs were upregulated; and the LCYBs and LCYEs were downregulated in all segments. Notably, the BCH1s remained highly expressed in the hypochile, whereas BCH2s and CYP97A3s were downregulated in all segments (Fig. 2c). Most CBP structural genes, especially the PSYs and BCH1s, remained upregulated only in the hypochile after flowering, which supported the results of the morphological anatomical and metabolomic analyses indicating that the carotenoid content was highest in the hypochile among the flower segments, resulting in a yellow colour (Figs. 1c and 2a).

Moreover, two types of carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase (CCD), the CCD1 and CCD7, were identified from the transcriptome data. These genes began to show upregulation in D7, and their expression reached its highest level at D8 (Fig. 2c), whereas the carotenoid contents of the segments decreased from D7 to D8 (Fig. 2a). However, the CCD1s were expressed in all segments at D8, whereas the expression levels of the CCD7s remained higher only in the perianths and epichile.

Identification of R2R3-MYBs involved in the regulation of pigment biosynthesis

The maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree suggested that eleven R2R3-MYBs from KOVA belonged to subgroup 21 of the R2R3-MYBs, which is related to RCP1, a positive regulator of the CBP (Fig. 3a; the blue circle in the figure). Additionally, two R2R3-MYBs belonged to subgroup 6, which is closely related to PeMYB2, a positive regulator of the ABP (Fig. 3a; the red circle in the figure).

**Fig. 3: The identification of R2R3-MYB candidates involved in pigment biosynthesis using bioinformatics analysis.**

Based on the FPKM values of the R2R3-MYBs of KOVA that belonged to subgroup 6 and subgroup 21, the heatmap analysis showed that the R2R3-MYBs of KOVA that clustered in subgroup 21 could be characterised as four types: type I R2R3-MYBs were upregulated in the hypochile at D7 and in all segments at D8; type II R2R3-MYBs were upregulated only in the hypochile, and their expression level was highest at D7; type III R2R3-MYBs were upregulated only in the hypochile at D1; and type IV R2R3-MYBs were upregulated in all segments at D8 (Fig. 3b). Additionally, in subgroup 6, two different expression profiles of the R2R3-MYBs of KOVA were observed: type I R2R3-MYBs were upregulated only in the epichile at D4, and type II R2R3-MYBs were upregulated in the perianths and epichile at D7 (Fig. 3b). The expression profiles of the type I and II R2R3-MYBs were consistent with the expression profiles of ABP structural genes in the flower segments at D4 and D7, respectively (Fig. 2b).

To further confirm the potential functions of these R2R3-MYBs during flower development, we identified seventeen coexpressed gene modules and determined which R2R3-MYBs were coexpressed with structural genes involved in the ABP and CBP using weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA; Supplementary Fig. 1). In the midnight-blue module, the type II R2R3-MYB belonging to subgroup 21 (Unigene0031636) was coexpressed with the BCH1s (Fig. 3c). Additionally, we found that the type I R2R3-MYB belonging to subgroup 6 (Unigene0056193) presented a co-expression relationship with ABP structural genes in the light-yellow module (Fig. 3d).

The results of the phylogenetic tree analysis, heatmap analysis and WGCNA suggested that the expression pattern of Unigene0031636 is positively related to the expression of CBP structural genes during flower development and that this unigene is a candidate for the activation of the expression of CBP structural genes; it was designated Rhyncholaeliocattleya promoted carotenoid pigmentation 1 (RcPCP1). In contrast, Unigene0056193 is a candidate for promoting the expression of ABP structural genes and was designated Rhyncholaeliocattleya promoted anthocyanin pigmentation 1 (RcPAP1). Although type II R2R3-MYB (Isoform0012108), belonging to subgroup 6, was not found to present a co-expression relationship with ABP structural genes according to WGCNA, its expression profile was consistent with the expression pattern of ABP structural genes at D7 (Figs. 2b and 3b). Therefore, Isoform0012108 was considered a candidate that might activate the ABP and was designated Rhyncholaeliocattleya promoted anthocyanin pigmentation 2 (RcPAP2). Finally, we confirmed the expression profiles of these candidates using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR), and the results were consistent with the transcriptome data (Fig. 3b, e).

Transient overexpression of RcPCP1 and RcPAP1/2 in the perianths of a Phalaenopsis hybrid

To verify the function of the putative regulators involved in pigment biosynthesis, RcPAP1/2 and RcRCP1 were infiltrated into the perianths of a Phalaenopsis hybrid via Agrobacterium transformation. The overexpression of the empty vector (EV) did not change the colour of the perianths, which resembled the phenotype of the mock-treated flowers (Fig. 4a). The overexpression of RcPCP1 or RcPAP1/2 resulted in white perianths that became slightly yellow or purple-red, respectively (Fig. 4a). We found that the level of carotenoid accumulation was higher in the RcPCP1-overexpressing (OE-RcPCP1) lines than in the mock- and EV-treated plants and that the transcription levels of PePSY, PeLCYE and PeBCH1 were upregulated (Fig. 4b). Notably, PePSYs and BCH1s remained highly expressed in the hypochile of KOVA at D7 and D8 (Fig. 2c). As expected, the level of anthocyanin accumulation was increased in the perianths of the OE-RcPAP1/2 lines compared to the perianths of the mock- and EV-treated plants, and the ABP structural genes from PeF3H to PeANS were notably upregulated in the OE-RcPAP1/2 lines (Fig. 4c). These results indicated that RcRCP1 and RcPAP1/2 could activate CBP and ABP structural genes and promote yellow or red pigmentation in Phalaenopsis flowers, respectively.

**Fig. 4: Verification of the function of *RcPAP1*/2 and *RcPCP1* in *Phalaenopsis* hybrid petals via a transient overexpression assay.**

The B-class AP3- and AGL6-like MADS-box genes participate in flower colour formation

The B-class AP3- and AGL6-like MADS-box genes were screened from our transcriptome data, and different subgroups of AP3 and AGL6 were identified using phylogenetic trees based on the neighbour-joining (NJ) method (Fig. 5a). The heatmap of these MADS-box genes showed that their expression profiles exhibited spatiotemporal specificity during floral development (Fig. 5a). Among AP3-like genes, both the AP3-1s and AP3-4s were expressed in the perianths and lip. However, the AP3-1s were expressed at both D7 and D8, whereas the AP3-4s were highly expressed only at D8. Both the AP3-2s and AP3-3s were expressed at D1 and D4. Spatially, the expression of AP3-2s was high in the hypochiles and gradually decreased from the hypochiles to the petals, whereas the expression level of AP3-3s did not differ markedly among flower segments. Moreover, the AGL6-1s were highly expressed in the perianths at D1 and D4, and their expression level in the sepals was higher than that in the petals (Fig. 5a). Additionally, the AGL6-2s were expressed in the lip at all developmental stages, and their expression level in the hypochiles was higher than that in the epichiles. These results showed that different combinations of the AP3- and AGL6-like MADS-box genes participated in determining the identity of the flower segments during KOVA flower development: AP3-1/3/4 and AGL6-1 were associated with the sepals, AP3-1/2/3/4 and AGL6-1 were associated with the petals, and AP3-1/2/3/4 and AGL6-2 were associated with the lip. Although the AP3-1/2/3/4s and AGL6-2s were expressed in both lip segments, the transcription level of the AP3-1/4s was higher in the purple-red epichile than in the yellow hypochile, whereas the transcription level of AP3-2s and AGL6-2s in the hypochile was higher than that in the epichile. Although we did not find co-expression relationships of the AP3- and AGL6-like genes with ABP structural genes according to WGCNA, the AGL6-2s were coexpressed with BCH1s and RcPCP1 (Fig. 3c), and the AP3-1/4s were coexpressed with the PSYs, ZDSs and Z-ISOs (Fig. 5b) during floral development.

**Fig. 5: Spatiotemporal expression analysis of the *AP3*- and *AGL6*-like genes in the perianth and lip segments during floral development.**

To further investigate the differential expression of AP3- and AGL6-like genes between the sepal/petal segments, qRT-PCR was used to analyse the expression profiles of these MADS-box genes in the sepal/petal segments at D4 and D7 (Fig. 5c). The results showed that the differences in the expression of AP3-1/2/4 and AGL6-2 between sepal/petal segments with similar colours were smaller than those between lip segments with different colours (Figs. 1c and 5c, d). Moreover, the transcriptome data showed that the expression levels of the AP3-1/2/4s and AGL6-2s differed more between the epichile and hypochile than between the sepal and petal (Fig. 5a). These results showed that the expression levels of the AP3-1/2/4s and AGL6-2s differed more between the epichile and hypochile (the lip segments display obvious phenotypic differences) than between the sepal/petal segments (which show similar phenotypes, especially in terms of colour).

In addition, we identified a peloric mutant, designated KOVA mutant 1 (M1), in which the lip was transformed into petals (Fig. 6a). The colouration of the epichile and hypochile of M1 at D8 changed from the original yellow and purple-red colouration to very light yellow and almost white coloration, respectively (Fig. 6a). Before full flowering, we could not distinguish M1 from KOVA, and we only collected M1 samples at D8. Therefore, according to the heatmap analysis of transcript expression, we compared the expression profiles of the genes that were expressed at the late developmental stage (i.e., D7 and D8), including AP3- and AGL6-like genes and genes involved in pigment biosynthesis, between M1 and wild-type flowers at D8 using qRT-PCR. The results showed that the epichile and hypochile dispalyed a similar phenotype in M1 compared to the wild-type, the differential expression of AP3-1/4 and AGL6-2 in the lip segments was lower in M1 than that in the wild-type, and RcPCP1, BCH1 and RcPAP2 were obviously downregulated in M1 (Fig. 6a, b).

**Fig. 6: The relationship between flower colour and the expression levels of *AP3-* and *AGL6*-like genes.**

Discussion

The expression levels of structural genes in pigment biosynthesis pathways can directly influence pigment accumulation to determine flower colour^6,16,17. However, most studies have focused on either anthocyanins or carotenoids, and little is known about the detailed process of colour differentiation in the sepal and petal segments. Based on a morphological anatomical analysis performed together with large-scale metabolome analysis and transcriptome analysis, our study indicated that colour pattern formation during KOVA floral development could be divided into three phases. In phase I (i.e., D1), the ABP and CBP were inactivated, resulting in an absence of red or yellow flower segments (Figs. 1d and 2b). In phase II (i.e., from D2 to before D7), the whole ABP was strongly activated only in the epichile, which resulted in the substantial accumulation of cyanins and purple-red colouration of the epichile (Fig. 2a, b). In the final phase (i.e., from D7 to D8), the perianths and hypochile turned pale pink and yellow, respectively. In this phase, the whole ABP was activated in the sepals and petals, and cyanins accumulated. Nevertheless, the intensity of the activity of the ABP structural genes was lower in the perianths in phase III than that in the epichile in phase II, which might be the reason that the sepals and petals produce only small amounts of cyanins and appear pale pink (Fig. 2a, b). Although the increased lutein content resulted in various degrees of yellow green coloration in the sepals and petals at D7, lutein content significantly decreased at D8 and ultimately resulted in the loss of the yellow colour. According to previous studies, BCH and CYP97A3 can hydroxylate the β-ring of cyclic carotenes to produce the precursor of lutein^16,34,35, and the suppression of the BCH2 by RNA interference (RNAi) in Oncidium ‘Gower Ramsey’ (GR) flowers causes a reduction in the lutein content³⁶. Additionally, CCDs can cleave carotenoids to generate colourless apocarotenoids¹⁷, and the overexpression of OgCCD1 in GR flowers causes their yellow lip produce white spots³⁷. Thus, from D7 to D8, the reduction in the α-carotene and lutein contents of the KOVA perianths and epichile might be caused by the downregulation of BCH2s and CYP97A3s and the upregulation of CCD1s (Fig. 2c). In contrast, the hypochile maintained the highest α-carotene and lutein contents at D8, possibly due to the sustained expression of BCH1s and reduced expression of CCD7s (Fig. 2c). A decrease in the chlorophyll content resulted in the loss of green colour and a complete shift to yellow colouration in the hypochile (Figs. 1a and 2a). Notably, the LCYEs and LCYBs were obviously downregulated in the sepals, petals, and lips at phase III (Fig. 2c). This can be explained by metabolic feedback regulation, which plays an important role in carotenoid accumulation³⁸. A previous study showed that the expression level of LCYE might present a negative correlation with the lutein content³⁹. Therefore, an increased lutein content might result in the downregulation of the expression of LCYEs and LCYBs in KOVA flowers. According to the above findings, our study showed that the process of colour differentiation among the floral segments was very complicated. ABP and CBP structural genes were expressed with high spatiotemporal specificity during KOVA flower development, which directly caused the unbalanced distribution of pigments, leading to colour differentiation in the perianths and lip segments.

R2R3-MYBs can regulate the spatiotemporal expression of the structural genes involved in pigment biosynthesis pathways to determine pigmentation intensity and patterning in flowers, which plays a key role in the regulation of flower colour formation^4,40. In our study, the protein sequences of both RcPAP1 and RcPAP2 were found to exhibit high sequence similarity with PeMYB2 (Fig. 3a; Supplementary Fig. 3), which has been shown to promote anthocyanin accumulation in Phalaenopsis hybrid flowers⁵. The transient overexpression assay results showed that the overexpression of RcPAP1/2 activated some ABP structural genes, leading to the accumulation of anthocyanin in Phalaenopsis hybrid flowers, which caused the white petals to become purple-red (Fig. 4a, c) and suggested that RcPAP1/2 are likely to function as an ABP activator in KOVA flowers. Interestingly, RcPAP1 was highly expressed only in the epichile at D4, whereas the expression of RcPAP2 was upregulated in the sepals, petals, and epichile at D7 (Fig. 3b). These results indicated that RcPAP1 and RcPAP2 might determine the purple-red colour of the epichile and the pale pink colour of the perianths, respectively, in KOVA. Different regions exist in the amino acid sequences of RcPAP1 and RcPAP2 (Supplementary Fig. 3), indicating that they might be derived from different genes with activators that may also be different. Thus, the different activators may have caused the difference in spatiotemporal expression between RcPAP1 and RcPAP2. Additionally, it is worth noting that the activity of ABP structural genes in the epichile at D4 was obviously higher than that in the sepals and petals at D7 (Fig. 2b). However, anthocyanin accumulation and the expression level of ABP structural genes were not obviously different between the OE-RcPAP1 and OE-RcPAP2 lines (Fig. 4c). There are two possible explanations for this finding: R2R3-MYB usually forms an MBW complex with bHLH and WD40 proteins to activate ABP structural genes⁴¹, which indicates that the interacting partner of RcPAPs may be downregulated at D7; some MYBs function as repressors and form a complex with bHLH proteins and other activators⁴¹. It is possible that some repressors were upregulated at D7 to prevent effective MBW complex formation in KOVA flowers. These possibilities need to be tested in the future. In summary, RcPAP1 and RcPAP2 might spatiotemporally regulate red colour formation in KOVA flower segments during floral development. The specific expression of the former contributed to the purple-red colour of the epichile at phase II, and the latter was activated in the perianths, resulting in the pale pink coloration of the perianths at phase III. This finding indicates that differences of anthocyanin accumulation among flower segments may be regulated by different R2R3-MYBs during floral development in plants.

RCP1 belongs to subgroup 21 of the R2R3-MYB family and can activate CBP structural genes to increase the carotenoid content in Mimulus lewisii flowers¹⁸. Our study indicated that the protein sequence of RcPCP1 was homologous to that of RCP1 (Fig. 3a; Supplementary Fig. 4) and that RcPCP1 was highly expressed only in the hypochile (Fig. 3b, e). Additionally, the WGCNA results suggested that RcPCP1 presented a co-expression relationship with BCH1s during KOVA flower development. Moreover, a slightly yellow colour appeared in the OE-RcPCP1 petals (Fig. 4a). The carotenoid content and the expression levels of PePSY, PeLCYE, and PeBCH1 in the OE-RcPCP1 petals were higher than those in the mock- and EV-treated petals (Fig. 4b). Notably, the PSYs and BCH1s maintained higher expression levels in the hypochile of after KOVA flowering (Fig. 2c). These results suggested that the spatiotemporally specific expression of RcPCP1 might promote α-carotene and lutein accumulation in the hypochile, resulting in the appearance of yellow colouration in phase III. These results also implied that some R2R3-MYBs belonging to subgroup 21 of monocots might possess a similar function to RCP1 in the regulation of the CBP in flowers. The yellow parts of flowers can help some plants attract pollinators^1,42, and yellow is also one of the most important colours of ornamental flowers. Therefore, RcPCP1 will be an important target for future studies on the evolution of orchid flower colouration and will be valuable for the breeding of novel ornamental lines or crops.

At present, most studies focus on the mechanism by which the MBW complex regulates flower colour formation, while MADS-box genes, which are dominant actors in the determination of flower organ identity linked to shape and colour, are often ignored. According to the P code of Orchidaceae, the SP complex comprises AP3-1 and AGL6-1 and is necessary for the development of sepals and petals, whereas AP3-2 and AGL6-2 form the determinant unit of the L complex and are exclusively required for lip formation²³. Our study showed that the AP3-1/2/3/4s and AGL6-2s were involved in the development of the identity of the lip during KOVA floral development, but the expression levels of AP3-1/2/4s and AGL6-2s displayed more differences between the yellow hypochile and the purple-red epichile (Fig. 5a), which might be the reason for the obvious phenotypic difference between these two segments. However, the expressional differences in these MADS-box genes between the sepal/petal segments (they show similar phenotypes during floral development, especially regarding coloration) were smaller than the differences compared to the lip segments (Figs. 1c and 5c, d). Moreover, the AP3-1/4s and AGL6-2s exhibited a co-expression relationship with some CBP structural genes and RcPCP1 (Figs. 3c and 5b). Additionally, the obvious downregulation of RcPCP1, BCH1, and RcPAP2 might reduce the yellow and red coloration of the M1 hypochile and epichile, respectively (Fig. 6b), and the expression levels of AP3-1/4 and ALG6-2 also differed in M1 compared to the wild-type at D8. Within Orchidaceae, the suppression of the expression of OAGL6-2 in the Oncidium Lemon Heart lip using virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) resulted in the lightening of yellow colouration and the development of green areas on the abaxial lip²³. In addition, when the E-class MADS-box genes PeSEP2 and PeSEP3 were silenced using VIGS in Phalaenopsis OX Red Shoes, the sepals and petals showed green colouration and their tips accumulated higher levels of anthocyanins²⁴. Therefore, the expression levels of AP3- and AGL6-like genes in different combinations might contribute to colour differentiation of the perianth and lip segments during floral development in KOVA. In addition, previous studies have shown that changes in the expression levels of MADS-box genes are accompanied by the transformation of flower petal identity, including petal shape and colour^{23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,43}, which suggested that MADS-box genes might have multiple functions and be involved in the shape and colour differentiation of sepals and petals; several MADS-box genes have been verified to directly or indirectly regulate CBP^44,45 or ABP⁴⁶ structural gene expression to influence colour in fruits, which also supports our finding that MADS-box genes might participate in KOVA flower colour formation. However, how MADS-box genes actually influence flower colour formation is still unknown, and further functional studies in plants involving thorough transgenic systems are needed to illustrate the role of MADS-box genes in this process.

In summary, the RcPAP1/2, RcPCP1 and AP3/AGL6 MADS-box genes might collectively regulate colour differentiation in perianth and lip segments during KOVA flower development (Fig. 7), which may result in the spatiotemporal expression of ABP and CBP structural genes to determine colour differentiation, as follows: substantial cyanin accumulation in the epichile results in purple-red colouration before flowering; after flowering, the low levels of cyanin and carotenoids in the perianths result in a pale pink colour, and the extremely high α-carotene and lutein contents in the hypochile result in yellow colouration. These findings from this study can enrich our understanding of flower colour pattern formation.

**Fig. 7: The mechanism of colour differentiation in the sepals, petals, and lip segments during KOVA floral development.**

Methods

Plant materials and sampling

Rhyncholaeliocattleya Beauty Girl ‘KOVA’ (KOVA) flowers are very large and exhibit pale pink perianths, a purple-red epichile and a yellow hypochile (Fig. 1a), while KOVA mutant 1 (M1) exhibits a lip that has been transformed into petals (Fig. 6a). The hybrid Phalaenopsis flower has white perianths and a light-yellow lip with red stripes (Fig. 4a) and was used for the transient overexpression assay to identify the function of isoforms/unigenes.

All orchids used in this study were grown in a Chinese Academic Forestry greenhouse (Beijing, China) under natural light with daytime and night-time temperatures of 24–30 °C.

We collected sepals, petals, the purple-red region of epichiles and the yellow region of hypochiles from KOVA flowers at D1 (i.e., bub length < 2 cm), D4 (i.e., bub length 4–5 cm), D7 (i.e., two days after flowering), and D8 (i.e., ten days after flowering) (Fig. 1d). The same four tissues of the M1 flowers were also sampled. The areas of transient isoform/unigene overexpression in Phalaenopsis hybrid flowers were sampled. All materials were sampled, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and then stored at −80 °C.

Identification of pigments

According to a previous study⁴⁷, flower tissues were weighed (50 mg), ground into a powder in liquid nitrogen and resuspended in 200 µl methanol, which enabled the extraction of flavonoids and carotenoids from the tissue powder. Then, an equal volume of water and dichloromethane was added to the methanol extract, followed by thorough mixing. Finally, the samples were centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 2 min to separate flavonoids and carotenoids into the supernatant liquid (aqueous) and bottom liquid (non-aqueous).

Metabolite profiling

Flavonoids and carotenoids in the sepals, petals, epichiles, and hypochiles of KOVA flowers at D7 and D8 were identified and quantified by using an LC-ESI-MS/MS system (Fig. 1d; HPLC, UFLC SHIMADZU CBM20A system, www.shimadzu.com.cn/; MS, Applied Biosystems 4500 QTrap, www.appliedbiosystems.com.cn/). Moreover, total chlorophyll was extracted and quantified as previously described in ref. ⁴⁸. At both stages, three biological replicate bundles were evaluated for each part of the flower (i.e., samples of the same segment from four individuals were mixed to form one replicate), for a total of 24 samples. The flavonoids present in the freeze-dried samples were extracted, identified, and quantified using a previously described method⁴⁹.

For carotenoid extraction, the freeze-dried samples were ground into powder using a mixer mill (MM 400, Retsch, Germany) with a zirconia bead for 1.5 min at 30 Hz, and 100 mg of the powder was weighed and added to 1 ml of extraction solution 1 (hexane–acetone–ethanol (2:1:1 by volume) containing 0.1% butylated hydroxytoluene). Then, the sample was vortexed for 30 s and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm and 4 °C for 5 min. The supernatant liquid was collected and mixed with 1 ml of the extraction solution, and the mixture was centrifuged again. The final supernatant liquid was dried under a stream of nitrogen gas. A total of 200 μl of extraction solution 2 ((ethyl nitrile-methyl alcohol)-methyl tert-butyl ether (17(3:1):3) by volume) was used to dissolve the dried residues, and the sample was subsequently vortexed for 30 s and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm at 4 °C for 2 min. Finally, the extract residues were filtered through a 0.22-μm membrane filter and stored in brown bottles. Carotenoid quantification in the samples was performed according to a previously described method⁵⁰. In addition, the total carotenoids and anthocyanins of the samples showing transient overexpression were extracted and quantified as previously described^48,51.

Total RNA extraction and quality assessment

All freeze-dried samples were ground to a powder in liquid nitrogen and weighed (50 mg) to extract total RNA using an RNA extraction kit (Huayueyang Biotechnology Inc., Beijing, CN) following the specifications of the kit. We used an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies Inc., CA, USA) and agarose gel electrophoresis to detect the integrity of RNA, and the purity and concentration of the RNA were analysed by using a NanoDrop™ One/One^C system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA).

PacBio Iso-Seq library preparation, sequencing and data analysis

PacBio Iso-Seq library preparation and sequencing were performed as previously described⁵² with some modifications. To obtain all full-length transcriptome sequences expressed during KOVA flower development, the total RNA of the sepals, petals, epichiles, and hypochiles from D1, D7 and D8 flowers were fully mixed in equal quantities to construct sequencing libraries. Then, cDNA was synthesised using the SMARTer™ PCR cDNA Synthesis kit. After 14 cycles of PCR amplification, the products with sizes of 1–4 kb and >4 kb size used to construct libraries using the BluePippin™ Size-Selection System (Sage Science, MA, USA). Then, large-scale PCR was performed for the two libraries to amplify full-length cDNA, which was used for SMRTbell library construction (including cDNA damage repair, terminal repair, and ligation with SMRT dumbbell-type adapters). Before sequencing, the SMRTbell template was annealed with a sequencing primer, and polymerase was linked to the primer-annealed template. The polymerase-bound templates were sequenced on the PacBio Sequel platform using P6-C4 chemistry with 10 h movies.

The unique full-length transcriptome sequences (isoforms) were obtained from the raw sequencing data using the SMRT Link v5.0.1 pipeline⁵³ supported by Pacific Biosciences. First, the circular consensus sequence (CCS) reads were extracted from the subreads in a BAM file. Second, the CCS reads were classified into full-length non-chimeric (FLNC), non-full-length (nFL), chimeric and short (i.e., read length < 200 bp) reads depending on whether cDNA primers and poly A tails were detected. Subsequently, we used Iterative Clustering for Error Correction (ICE) to cluster the FLNC reads and generate the consensus FLNC reads, which were further polished with nFL reads using Quiver to produce high-quality consensus FLNC reads. Finally, the redundant high-quality consensus FLNC reads were removed using CD-HIT-v4.6.7⁵⁴ with a threshold of 0.99 identity to obtain the final isoforms.

The final isoforms were annotated by BLAST searches against the nonredundant protein (Nr) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database (http://www.genome.jp/kegg) at an E-value threshold of 1e−5. To eliminate isoforms that may have been derived from Cymbidium mosaic virus (CymMV), we used CymMV genomes (ref|NC_001812.1|) as a reference to identify virus-originating isoforms according to their similarity (query coverage > 90% and percent identity > 80%) and obtained the final isoform set. The coding sequences (CDSs), protein sequences, and UTR sequences of the isoforms were analysed using ANGEL⁵⁵. We aligned the protein sequences of the isoforms to the Pfam database (version 26.0) by using the Pfam_Scan program⁵⁶ and SMART database (version 06/08/2012) with the HMMER program for profile hidden Markov models for biosequence analysis (http://hmmer.org/) to predict the protein domains.

Illumina transcriptome (RNA-Seq) library preparation, sequencing and expression level estimation

The total RNA of the sepals, petals, epichiles, and hypochiles from D1, D4, D7, and D8 flower was extracted and used for RNA-Seq sequencing (Fig. 1d) with the aim of describing the transcriptome expression profile during KOVA flower development. In these four stages, three biological replicate bundles from each part of the flower were evaluated (i.e., samples from the same structures of 4–6 individuals were mixed to form one replicate), for a total of 48 samples. RNA-Seq library preparation was performed according to a previous study⁵⁷. The final PCR products were sequenced using Illumina HiSeq^TM 4000.

We used in-house Perl scripts to process the raw data to obtain the clean data. In this process, reads containing adapters, reads containing more than 10% unknown nucleotides (N) and low-quality reads containing more than 50% low-quality (Q-value ≤ 10) bases were filtered from the raw data. The rRNA reads were removed from the clean data to obtain the effective data using bowtie2⁵⁸. The effective data were mapped to the CymMV genome (ref|NC_001812.1|) using bowtie2, and the CymMV reads were filtered from the effective data to generate the final clean data. These final clean data were then mapped to the pseudoreference genome (i.e., the previously described final isoform set) using HISAT2⁵⁹. The unmapped reads were assembled de novo with Trinity⁶⁰ to obtain the unigene set. The annotation, CDSs, protein sequences, UTR sequences, and protein domain predictions of the unigenes were analysed using a method consistent with the above approach. Then, we combined these unigenes with the PacBio Iso-Seq data, resulting in a final reference transcriptome for KOVA. Isoform and unigene expression levels were estimated via the FPKM method using RSEM⁶¹.

Phylogenetic analysis and co-expression network construction

The ML phylogenetic tree was constructed by using RAxML-HPC BlackBox with the default parameters at the CIPRES SCIENCE GATEWAY (http://www.phylo.org/) to analyse the phylogenetic relationships among the R2R3-MYBs of KOVA and the genes from other plants. Sequence alignments were performed with MUSCLE⁶². Then, NJ phylogenetic trees were constructed with bootstrap values estimated from 1000 replicate runs using MEGA7⁶³ to analyse the phylogenetic relationships among the AP3- and AGL6-like genes of KOVA and the genes from other plants. Phylogenetic trees were modified using Evolgenius (http://www.evolgenius.info/evolview/). Heatmap analysis was used to display the isoform/unigene expression profile using Omiscshare tools (http://omicshare.com/tools/). The WGCNA was performed using the WGCNA (v1.47) package in R⁶⁴. The isoforms/unigenes expression values were imported into the WGCNA package to establish co-expression modules using the automatic network construction function blockwiseModules with deissuesettings, except that the power was 0.5; the TOMType was unsigned; the mergeCutHeigh was 0.8; and the minModuleSize was 50. All of the isoforms/unigenes were finally clustered into 17 modules. The networks were visualised using Cytoscape v3.3.0.

qRT-PCR analysis

cDNA was synthesised from total RNA using EasyScript One-Step gDNA Removal and cDNA Synthesis SuperMix (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China). The primer pairs for each isoform/unigene were designed using NCBI Primer-BLAST (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). The cDNA template was fully mixed with 2X TB Green™ Premix Ex Taq™ (TaKaRa, Japan) and used for qRT-PCR in a LightCycler 480 System (Roche, USA). The qRT-PCR protocol involved an initial denaturation step (95 °C for 30 s, ramp rate of 4.4 °C/s), followed by 45 cycles of PCR (95 °C for 5 s, ramp rate of 4.4 °C/s; 60 °C for 30 s, ramp rate of 2.2 °C/s, acquisition mode: single), melting (analysis mode: melting curve, 95 °C for 5 s, ramp rate of 4.4 °C/s; 60 °C for 1 min, ramp rate of 2.2 °C/s; 95 °C, acquisition mode: continuous, acquisitions: 5/°C), and cooling (50 °C for 30 s, ramp rate of 2.2 °C/s). From D1 to D8, the transcriptional levels of the isoforms/unigenes were calculated from three biological samples. The 18S housekeeping gene of KOVA and PeActin4⁶⁵ were used for normalisation. All PCR primers are listed in the supplementary materials (Supplementary Table 1).

Transient overexpression of the R2R3-MYBs by Agrobacterium infiltration

The CDSs of RcPCP1, RcPAP1 and RcPAP2 were cloned by using the corresponding cloning primers, which were designed based on transcriptome data (Supplementary Table 1). Overexpression vector construction and infiltration were performed using a previously described method⁵ with some modifications. Briefly, RcRCP1, RcPA1 and RcPA2 were ligated into pCAMBIA1304 by using T4 ligase. The recombinant plasmids were transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens EHA105 via heat activation. After incubation, the EHA105 solution containing the overexpression vectors was centrifuged, and bacterial cell pellets were then resuspended by adding liquid infection medium (Murashige and Skoog liquid medium containing 1 mM MES and 100 μM acetosyringone) to an OD₆₀₀ = 1. The final suspensions were injected into the petals of the Phalaenopsis hybrid two days before flowering by using an injector. Subsequently, the infected Phalaenopsis hybrid was cultivated in a Chinese Academic Forestry greenhouse under natural light with daytime and night-time temperatures ranging from 24 to 30 °C for 6−8 days. After the emergence of a stable phenotype, the area of transient isoform/unigene overexpression in the flower was photographed, and RNA was extracted. To ensure the reliability of the results, the phenotypes assessment in the transient overexpression assay of each isoform/unigene was independently repeated at least three times.

Statistics and reproducibility

Significant test was conducted by Student’s paired t-test using Omiscshare tools (http://omicshare.com/tools/), and asterisk and double asterisk indicate values that differ significantly from those in the sample with the highest value at P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively. In the experiment of RNA-Seq sequencing and metabolite profiling, three biological replicate bundles from each part of the flower were evaluated (i.e., samples from the same structures of 4–6 individuals were mixed to form one replicate). For the transient overexpression assays, the phenotypes assessment in the transient overexpression assay of each isoform/unigene was independently repeated at least three times to ensure the reliability and reproducibility of the results. Additionally, all of the qRT-PCR experiments in our study were performed three biological replications and the transcriptional levels of the isoforms/unigenes were calculated from three biological samples.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The RNA-Seq data have been deposited in NCBI under SRA accession codes: PRJNA559603. The Iso-Seq data have been deposited in NCBI under SRA accession codes: PRJNA559608. The sequence of RcPAP1, RcPAP2 and RcPCP1 have been deposited in NCBI under GenBank accession numbers: BankIt2261106 RcPCP1 MN420461, BankIt2261154 RcPAP2 MN420462 and BankIt2261158 RcPCP1 MN420463.

References

Gigord, L. D. B. et al. Negative frequency-dependent selection maintains a dramatic flower color polymorphism in the rewardless orchid Dactylorhiza sambucina (l.) soò. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 6253–6255 (2001).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hopkins, R. & Rausher, M. D. Pollinator-mediated selection on flower color allele drives reinforcement. Science 335, 1090–1092 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Noman, A. et al. Biotechnological advancements for improving floral attributes in ornamental plants. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 530 (2017).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Davies, K. M. et al. From landing lights to mimicry: the molecular regulation of flower colouration and mechanisms for pigmentation patterning. Funct. Plant Biol. 39, 619 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hsu, C. C. et al. Three R2R3-MYB transcription factors regulate distinct floral pigmentation patterning in Phalaenopsis orchids. Plant Physiol. 168, 175–191 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhao, D. & Tao, J. Recent advances on the development and regulation of flower color in ornamental plants. Front. Plant Sci. 6, 261 (2015).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yuan, Y. W. et al. Competition between anthocyanin and flavonol biosynthesis produces spatial pattern variation of floral pigments between Mimulus species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 2448 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhou, H. et al. Multiple R2R3-MYB transcription factors involved in the regulation of anthocyanin accumulation in peach flower. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 1557 (2016).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Anwar, M. et al. Ectopic overexpression of a Novel R2R3-MYB, NtMYB2 from Chinese Narcissus represses anthocyanin biosynthesis in tobacco. Molecules 23, 781 (2018).
Article PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Albert, N. W. et al. Members of an R2R3‐MYB transcription factor family in Petunia are developmentally and environmentally regulated to control complex floral and vegetative pigmentation patterning. Plant J. 65, 771–784 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gu, Z. et al. A novel R2R3-MYB transcription factor contributes to petal blotch formation by regulating organ-specific expression of PsCHS in tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa). Plant Cell Physiol. 60, 599–661 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Bradley, D. et al. Evolution of flower color pattern through selection on regulatory small RNAs. Science 358, 925–928 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tavares, H. et al. Selection and gene flow shape genomic islands that control floral guides. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 11006–11011 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chiou, C. Y. & Yeh, K. W. Differential expression of MYB gene (OgMYB1) determines color patterning in floral tissue of Oncidium Gower Ramsey. Plant Mol. Biol. 66, 379–388 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Li, C. et al. Anthocyanin biosynthesis regulation of DhMYB2 and DhbHLH1 in Dendrobium hybrids petals. Plant Physiol. Bioch. 112, 335–345 (2017).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Nisar, N. et al. Carotenoid metabolism in plants. Mol. Plant 8, 68–82 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Yuan, H. et al. Carotenoid metabolism and regulation in horticultural crops. Hortic. Res. 2, 15036 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Sagawa, J. M. et al. An R2R3‐MYB transcription factor regulates carotenoid pigmentation in Mimulus lewisii flowers. N. Phytol. 209, 1049–1057 (2016).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Bowman, J. L. et al. The ABC model of flower development: then and now. Development 139, 4095–4098 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pelaz, S. et al. B and C floral organ identity functions require SEPALLATA MADS-box genes. Nature 405, 200–203 (2000).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Honma, T. & Goto, K. Complexes of MADS-box proteins are sufficient to convert leaves into floral organs. Nature 409, 525–529 (2001).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Becker, A. & Günter, T. The major clades of MADS-box genes and their role in the development and evolution of flowering plants. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 29, 464–489 (2004).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Hsu, H. F. et al. Model for perianth formation in orchids. Nat. Plants 1, 15064 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Pan, Z. J. et al. Flower development of Phalaenopsis orchid involves functionally divergent SEPALLATA-like genes. N. Phytol. 202, 1024–1042 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Mitoma, M. & Kanno, A. Graduate the greenish flower phenotype of Habenaria radiata (Orchidaceae) is caused by a mutation in the SEPALLATA-Like MADS-Box gene HrSEP-1. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 831 (2018).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sommer, H. et al. Deficiens, a homeotic gene involved in the control of flower morphogenesis in Antirrhinum majus: the protein shows homology to transcription factors. Embo J. 9, 605–613 (1990).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tröbner, W. et al. GLOBOSA: a homeotic gene which interacts with DEFICIENS in the control of Antirrhinum floral organogenesis. Embo J. 11, 4693–4704 (1992).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Rijpkema, A. S. et al. Analysis of the Petunia TM6 MADS box gene reveals functional divergence within the DEF/AP3 lineage. Plant Cell 18, 1819–1832 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Vandenbussche, M. et al. Toward the analysis of the petunia MADS box gene family by reverse and forward transposon insertion mutagenesis approaches: B, C, and D floral organ identity functions require SEPALLATA-Like MADS box genes in Petunia. Plant Cell 15, 2680–2693 (2003).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Matsubara, K. et al. Green corolla segments in a wild Petunia species caused by a mutation in FBP2, a SEPALLATA-like MADS box gene. Planta 228, 401–409 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tsai, W. C. et al. Four DEF-like MADS box genes displayed distinct floral morphogenetic roles in Phalaenopsis orchid. Plant Cell Physiol. 45, 831–844 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tsai, W. C. et al. Interactions of B-class complex proteins involved in tepal development in Phalaenopsis orchid. Plant Cell Physiol. 49, 814–824 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hsiao, Y. Y. et al. Transcriptomic analysis of floral organs from Phalaenopsis orchid by using oligonucleotide microarray. Gene 518, 91–100 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhu, C. et al. The regulation of carotenoid pigmentation in flowers. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 504, 132–141 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Colasuonno, P. et al. The carotenoid biosynthetic and catabolic genes in wheat and their association with yellow pigments. BMC Genomics 18, 122 (2017).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Wang, H. M. et al. Modification of flower colour by suppressing β-ring carotene hydroxylase genes in Oncidium. Plant Biol. 18, 220–229 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chiou, C. Y. et al. Differential expression of carotenoid-related genes determines diversified carotenoid coloration in floral tissues of Oncidium cultivars. Planta 232, 937–948 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cazzonelli, C. I. & Pogson, B. J. Source to sink: regulation of carotenoid biosynthesis in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 15, 266–274 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Yu, B. et al. Enhancing the carotenoid content of Brassica napus seeds by downregulating lycopene epsilon cyclase. Transgenic Res. 17, 573–585 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Albert, N. W. et al. A conserved network of transcriptional activators and repressors regulates anthocyanin pigmentation in eudicots. Plant Cell 26, 962–980 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Xu, W. et al. Transcriptional control of flavonoid biosynthesis by MYB–bHLH–WDR complexes. Trends Plant Sci. 20, 176–185 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Owen, C. R. & Bradshaw, H. D. Induced mutations affecting pollinator choice in Mimulus lewisii (Phrymaceae). Arthropod-Plant Interact. 5, 235–244 (2011).
Article Google Scholar
Aceto, S. & Gaudio, L. The MADS and the beauty: genes involved in the development of orchid flowers. Curr. Genomics 12, 342–356 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lu, S. et al. The citrus transcription factor CsMADS6 modulates carotenoid metabolism by directly regulating carotenogenic genes. Plant Physiol. 176, 2657–2676 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Dong, T. et al. A tomato MADS-Box transcription factor, SlMADS2, acts as a negative regulator of fruit ripening. Plant Physiol. 163, 1026–1036 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jaakola, L. et al. A SQUAMOSA MADS box gene involved in the regulation of anthocyanin accumulation in bilberry fruits. Plant Physiol. 153, 1619–1629 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yuan, Y. W. et al. Bulk segregant analysis of an induced floral mutant identifies a MIXTA-Like R2R3 MYB controlling nectar guide formation in Mimulus Lewisii. Genetics 194, 523–528 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tang, Y. L. et al. Change law of hyperspectral data with chlorophyll and carotenoid for rice at different developmental stages. Rice Sci. 18, 59–66 (2004).
CAS Google Scholar
Wang, A. et al. A comparative metabolomics study of flavonoids in sweet potato with different flesh colors (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam). Food Chem. 260, 124–134 (2018).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Xiong, C. et al. A tomato B-box protein SlBBX20 modulates carotenoid biosynthesis by directly activating PHYTOENE SYNTHASE 1, and is targeted for 26S proteasome-mediated degradation. N. Phytol. 221, 279–294 (2019).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Hsieh, M. H. et al. Optimizing virus-induced gene silencing efficiency with Cymbidium mosaic virus in Phalaenopsis flower. Plant Sci. 201–202, 25–41 (2013).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Chao, Q. et al. The developmental dynamics of the Populus stem transcriptome. Plant Biotechnol. J. 17, 206–219 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gordon, S. P. et al. Widespread polycistronic transcripts in fungi revealed by single-molecule mRNA sequencing. PLoS ONE 10, e0132628 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Li, W. & Godzik, A. Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 22, 1658–1659 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Shimizu, K. et al. Angle: a sequencing errors resistant program for predicting protein coding regions in unfinished cDNA. J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol. 4, 649–664 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Finn, R. D. et al. The Pfam protein families database: towards a more sustainable future. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 279–285 (2016).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Liu, H. et al. Genome-wide comparative analysis of digital gene expression tag profiles during maize ear development. Genomics 106, 52–60 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kim, D. et al. Hisat: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat. Methods 12, 357–360 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Grabherr, M. G. et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-seq data without a reference genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 644–652 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Li, B. & Dewey, C. N. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinform. 12, 323 (2011).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with improved accuracy and speed. in 3rd International IEEE Computer Society Computational Systems Bioinformatics Conference (CSB 2004), 16−19. (IEEE, Stanford, 2004).
Kumar, S. et al. Mega7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 1870–1874 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Langfelder, P. & Horvath, S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinforma. 9, 559 (2008).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Chen, Y. H. et al. Transcription analysis of peloric mutants of Phalaenopsis orchids derived from tissue culture. Cell Res. 15, 639–657 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr. Li-Wei Chu (Chinese Academy of Forestry) for help with experiments. This work was funded by “The import of important parents of Cattleya and targeted breeding technology of lip” (Grant No. 2014-4-15).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding; Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, 100091, Beijing, China
Bai-Jun Li, Bao-Qiang Zheng, Long-Hai Zou, Xiao Wan, Hong-Juan Qiao & Yan Wang
Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Conservation and Sustainable Utilization, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 510650, Guangzhou, China
Jie-Yu Wang
Institute of Tropical Plant Sciences and Microbiology, National Cheng Kung University, 701, Tainan City, Taiwan
Wen-Chieh Tsai
Orchid Research and Development Center, National Cheng Kung University, 701, Tainan City, Taiwan
Wen-Chieh Tsai
Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration for Orchid Conservation and Utilization at College of Landscape Architecture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 350002, Fuzhou, China
Hsiang-Chia Lu, Di-Yang Zhang & Zhong-Jian Liu
State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Silviculture, Zhejiang A & F University, 311300, Lin’an, China
Long-Hai Zou
Research & Development Center of Flower, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 311202, Hangzhou, China
Xiao Wan
College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, South China Agricultural University, 510642, Guangzhou, China
Zhong-Jian Liu

Authors

Bai-Jun Li
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Bao-Qiang Zheng
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jie-Yu Wang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Wen-Chieh Tsai
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Hsiang-Chia Lu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Long-Hai Zou
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Xiao Wan
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Di-Yang Zhang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Hong-Juan Qiao
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Zhong-Jian Liu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Yan Wang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Y.W. managed the project; Y.W., Z-J.L. and B-J.L. designed experiment and coordinated the project; Y.W., Z-J.L. and B-J.L. wrote the paper; J-Y.W., W-C.T. and D.-Y.Z. reviewed the paper, B-J.L. and B-Q.Z. grew the plant material; B-J. L., B-Q. Z., L-H. Z. and X. W. collected and prepared samples; J-Y. W. assisted B.-J. L. in analysing transcriptome and metabolome data; B-J. L. participated in all the experiments; B-Q. Z., W-C. T. and H.-C. L. assisted in completing transient overexpression assay; H-J. Q. assisted in measuring total chlorophyll content of samples.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhong-Jian Liu or Yan Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Reporting Summary

Peer Review File

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, BJ., Zheng, BQ., Wang, JY. et al. New insight into the molecular mechanism of colour differentiation among floral segments in orchids. Commun Biol 3, 89 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-0821-8

Download citation

Received: 11 November 2019
Accepted: 10 February 2020
Published: 28 February 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-0821-8

This article is cited by

Auxin and carbohydrate control flower bud development in Anthurium andraeanum during early stage of sexual reproduction
- Xiao Wan
- Long-Hai Zou
- Danqing Tian
BMC Plant Biology (2024)
Integrated metabolome and transcriptome analysis provides insight into the leaf color change of Cymbidium ensifolium
- Huan Mei
- Xiaoying Zhang
- Qiaojuan Fu
Acta Physiologiae Plantarum (2024)
Integrative metabolome and transcriptome analyses reveal the differences in flavonoid and terpenoid synthesis between Glycyrrhiza uralensis (licorice) leaves and roots
- Kaiqiang Yu
- Li Peng
- Shijie Wu
Food Science and Biotechnology (2024)
Multiomics analysis provides new insights into the regulatory mechanism of carotenoid biosynthesis in yellow peach peel
- Jiarui Zheng
- Xiaoyan Yang
- Feng Xu
Molecular Horticulture (2023)
Molecular mechanism of different flower color formation of Cymbidium ensifolium
- Ye Ai
- Qing-Dong Zheng
- Zhong-Jian Liu
Plant Molecular Biology (2023)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.