Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Mass-based biocatalyst metrics to guide protein engineering and bioprocess development

Metrics are a useful way to assess biocatalyst performance and, when compared to techno-economic targets, can help set goals for further enzyme and bioprocess research and development. Here, we outline some of the remaining challenges to ensure wider acceptance of this approach, both in industry and in academia.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Benchmarking cycle.

References

  1. Sheldon, R. A. & Woodley, J. M. Chem. Rev. 118, 801–838 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arnold, F. H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 14420–14426 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hauer, B. ACS Catal. 10, 8418–8427 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wu, S., Snajdrova, R., Moore, J. C., Baldenius, K. & Bornscheuer, U. T. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 88–119 (2021).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. France, S. P., Hepworth, L. J., Turner, N. J. & Flitsch, S. L. ACS Catal. 7, 710–724 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schrittwieser, J. H., Velikogne, S., Hall, M. & Kroutil, W. Chem. Rev. 118, 270–348 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sperl, J. M. & Sieber, V. ACS Catal. 8, 2385–2396 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hönig, M., Sondermann, P., Turner, N. J. & Carreira, E. M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 8942–8973 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. de Souza, R. O. M. A., Miranda, L. S. M. & Bornscheuer, U. T. Eur. J. Chem. 23, 12040–12063 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ma, S. K. et al. Green Chem. 12, 81–86 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Savile, C. K. et al. Science 329, 305–309 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Huffman, M. A. et al. Science 366, 1255–1259 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ringborg, R. H. & Woodley, J. M. React. Chem. Eng. 1, 10–22 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sheldon, R. A. & Brady, D. Chem. Commun. 54, 6088–6104 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lima-Ramos, J., Tufvesson, P. & Woodley, J. M. Green Process Synth. 3, 195–213 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lundemo, M. T. & Woodley, J. M. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 99, 2465–2483 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Van Dien, S. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 24, 1061–1068 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bligaard, T. et al. ACS Catal. 6, 2590–2602 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kaiser, D., Yang, J. & Wuitschik, G. Org. Proc. Res. Dev. 22, 1222–1235 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Takahashi, K. et al. ChemCatChem 11, 1146–1152 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lange, J.-P. Nat. Catal. 4, 186–192 (2021).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vennestrøm, P. N. R., Christensen, C. H., Pedersen, S., Grunwaldt, J.-D. & Woodley, J. M. ChemCatChem 2, 249–258 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bornadel, A. et al. Org. Proc. Res. Dev. 23, 1262–1268 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bommarius, A. S. Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 6, 319–345 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Woodley, J. M. Curr. Opion. Chem. Biol. 17, 310–316 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kurahashi, R., Tanaka, S.-I. & Takano, K. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 140, 109626 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Truppo, M. D. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 8, 476–480 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.W. and M.P.M. contributed equally to conceptualizing this work. J.W. wrote the original manuscript. M.P.M. proofread and edited this work and generated the figure.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John M. Woodley.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Catalysis thanks Bruno Bühler, Dunming Zhu and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meissner, M.P., Woodley, J.M. Mass-based biocatalyst metrics to guide protein engineering and bioprocess development. Nat Catal 5, 2–4 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-021-00728-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-021-00728-5

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing