Solvent structures that surround active sites reorganize during catalysis and influence the stability of surface intermediates. Within zeolite pores, H2O molecules form hydrogen-bonded structures that differ substantially from bulk H2O. Here, we show by spectroscopic measurements and molecular dynamics simulations that H2O molecules form bulk-like three-dimensional structures within 1.3 nm cages, whereas H2O molecules coalesce into oligomeric one-dimensional chains when the pore diameter falls below 0.65 nm. The differences between these solvent structure motifs provide opportunities to manipulate enthalpy–entropy compensation relationships and greatly increase the rates of catalysis. We describe how the reorganization of these pore-size-dependent H2O structures during alkene epoxidation catalysis gives rise to entropy gains that increase the turnover rates by up to 400-fold. Collectively, this work shows that solvent molecules form distinct structures with a highly correlated motion within microporous environments, and the reorganization of these structures may be controlled to confer stability to the desired reactive intermediates.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. MD trajectories of the last 100 nanoseconds of equilibration, ab initio MD trajectories and initial and final simulated zeolite structures are available on Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5079480. Source data are provided with this paper.
The code and algorithms for analysing the MD simulations are deposited on Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5079480.
Sievers, C. et al. Phenomena affecting catalytic reactions at solid–liquid interfaces. ACS Catal. 6, 8286–8307 (2016).
Dyson, P. J. & Jessop, P. G. Solvent effects in catalysis: rational Improvements of catalysts via manipulation of solvent effects. Catal. Sci. Technol. 6, 3302–3316 (2016).
Bregante, D. T., Patel, A. Y., Johnson, A. M. & Flaherty, D. W. Catalytic thiophene oxidation by groups 4 and 5 framework-substituted zeolites with hydrogen peroxide: mechanistic and spectroscopic evidence for the effects of metal Lewis acidity and solvent Lewis basicity. J. Catal. 364, 415–425 (2018).
Anslyn, E. V. & Dougherty, D. A. Modern Physical Organic Chemistry (University Science Books, 2005).
Bregante, D. T. et al. Cooperative effects between hydrophilic pores and solvents: catalytic consequences of hydrogen bonding on alkene epoxidation in zeolites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 7302–7319 (2019).
Bregante, D. T. & Flaherty, D. W. Impact of specific interactions among reactive surface intermediates and confined water on epoxidation catalysis and adsorption in Lewis acid zeolites. ACS Catal. 9, 10951–10962 (2019).
Eckstein, S. et al. Influence of hydronium ions in zeolites on sorption. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 3450–3455 (2019).
Di Iorio, J. R., Johnson, B. A. & Roman-Leshkov, Y. Ordered hydrogen-bonded alcohol networks confined in Lewis acid zeolites accelerate transfer hydrogenation turnover rates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 19379–19392 (2020).
Shetty, M. et al. Directing the rate-enhancement for hydronium ion catalyzed dehydration via organization of alkanols in nanoscopic confinements. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 60, 2304–2311 (2021).
Zhang, K. et al. Adsorption of water and ethanol in MFI-type zeolites. Langmuir 28, 8664–8673 (2012).
Zhang, K. et al. Alcohol and water adsorption in zeolitic imidazolate frameworks. Chem. Commun. 49, 3245–3247 (2013).
Lively, R. P. et al. Ethanol and water adsorption in methanol-derived ZIF-71. Chem. Commun. 47, 8667–8669 (2011).
Mallon, E. E., Jeon, M. Y., Navarro, M., Bhan, A. & Tsapatsis, M. Probing the relationship between silicalite-1 defects and polyol adsorption properties. Langmuir 29, 6546–6555 (2013).
DeJaco, R. F. et al. Vapor‐ and liquid‐phase adsorption of alcohol and water in silicalite‐1 synthesized in fluoride media. AlChE J. 66, e16868 (2020).
Thomas, J. A. & McGaughey, A. J. H. Reassessing fast water transport through carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett. 8, 2788–2793 (2008).
Majumder, M., Chopra, N., Andrews, R. & Hinds, B. J. Enhanced flow in carbon nanotubes. Nature 438, 44 (2005).
Holt, J. K. et al. Fast mass transport through sub-2-nanometer carbon nanotubes. Science 312, 1034–1037 (2006).
Bregante, D. T. et al. Catalytic consequences of oxidant, alkene, and pore structure on alkene epoxidations within titanium silicates. ACS Catal. 10, 10169–10184 (2020).
Bregante, D. T. et al. Effects of hydrofluoric acid concentration on the density of silanol groups and water adsorption in hydrothermally synthesized transition-metal-substituted silicalite-1. Chem. Mater. 32, 7425–7437 (2020).
Cordon, M. J. et al. Dominant role of entropy in stabilizing sugar isomerization transition states within hydrophobic zeolite pores. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 14244–14266 (2018).
Gould, N. S. et al. Understanding solvent effects on adsorption and protonation in porous catalysts. Nat. Commun. 11, 1060 (2020).
Ball, P. Water as an active constituent in cell biology. Chem. Rev. 108, 74–108 (2008).
Forneris, F. & Mattevi, A. Enzymes without borders: mobilizing substrates, delivering products. Science 321, 213–216 (2008).
Snyder, P. W. et al. Mechanism of the hydrophobic effect in the biomolecular recognition of arylsulfonamides by carbonic anhydrase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 17889–17894 (2011).
Hur, S., Newby, Z. E. R. & Bruice, T. C. Transition state stabilization by general acid catalysis, water expulsion, and enzyme reorganization in Medicago savita chalcone isomerase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 2730–2735 (2004).
Setny, P. & Wisniewska, M. D. Water-mediated conformational preselection mechanism in substrate binding cooperativity to protein kinase A. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 3852–3857 (2018).
Grossman, M. et al. Correlated structural kinetics and retarded solvent dynamics at the metalloprotease active site. Nat. Struc. Mol. Bio. 18, 1102–1108 (2011).
Silverman, D. N. & McKenna, R. Solvent-mediated proton transfer in catalysis by carbonic anhydrase. Acc. Chem. Res. 40, 669–675 (2007).
Harris, J. W., Bates, J. S., Bukowski, B. C., Greeley, J. & Gounder, R. Opportunities in catalysis over metal-zeotypes enabled by descriptions of active centers beyond their binding site. ACS Catal. 10, 9476–9495 (2020).
Li, G., Wang, B. & Resasco, D. E. Water-mediated heterogeneously catalyzed reactions. ACS Catal. 10, 1294–1309 (2020).
Bates, J. S., Bukowski, B. C., Greeley, J. & Gounder, R. Structure and solvation of confined water and water–ethanol clusters within microporous Brønsted acids and their effects on ethanol dehydration catalysis. Chem. Sci. 11, 7102–7122 (2020).
Bukowski, B. C., Bates, J. S., Gounder, R. & Greeley, J. Defect-mediated ordering of condensed water structures in microporous zeolites. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 16422–16426 (2019).
Harris, J. W. et al. Titration and quantification of open and closed Lewis acid sites in Sn-Beta zeolites that catalyze glucose isomerization. J. Catal. 335, 141–154 (2016).
Gounder, R. & Davis, M. E. Monosaccharide and disaccharide isomerization over Lewis acid sites in hydrophobic and hydrophilic molecular sieves. J. Catal. 308, 176 (2013).
Vega-Vila, J. C. & Gounder, R. Quantification of intraporous hydrophilic binding sites in Lewis acid zeolites and consequences for sugar isomerization catalysis. ACS Catal. 10, 12197–12211 (2020).
Wang, M. et al. Genesis and stability of hydronium ions in zeolite channels. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 3444–3455 (2019).
Bai, P., Tsapatsis, M. & Siepmann, J. I. Multicomponent adsorption of alcohols onto silicalite-1 from aqueous solution: isotherms, structural analysis, and assessment of ideal adsorbed solution theory. Langmuir 28, 15566–15576 (2012).
Wang, C.-H., Bai, P., Siepmann, J. I. & Clark, A. E. Deconstructing hydrogen-bond networks in confined nanoporous materials: implications for alcohol–water separation. J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 19723–19732 (2014).
Bregante, D. T., Thornburg, N. E., Notestein, J. M. & Flaherty, D. W. Consequences of confinement for alkene epoxidation with hydrogen peroxide on highly dispersed group 4 and 5 metal oxide catalysts. ACS Catal. 8, 2995–3010 (2018).
Bregante, D. T., Tan, J. Z., Sutrisno, A. & Flaherty, D. W. Heteroatom substituted zeolite FAU with ultralow Al contents for liquid-phase oxidation catalysis. Catal. Sci. Tech. 10, 635–647 (2020).
Muñoz, M. A., Carmona, C. & Balón, M. FTIR study of water clusters in water–triethylamine solutions. Chem. Phys. 335, 37–42 (2007).
Bakker, H. J. & Skinner, J. L. Vibrational spectroscopy as a probe of structure and dynamics in liquid water. Chem. Rev. 110, 1498–1517 (2010).
Sun, Q. The Raman OH stretching bands of liquid water. Vib. Spectrosc. 51, 213–217 (2009).
Sun, Q. & Guo, Y. Vibrational sum frequency generation spectroscopy of the air/water interface. J. Mol. Liq. 213, 28–32 (2016).
Nihonyanagi, S. et al. Accurate determination of complex χ(2) spectrum of the air/water interface. J. Chem. Phys. 143, 124707 (2015).
Sadlej, J. Theoretical study of structure and spectra of cage clusters (H2O)n, n = 11,12. Chem. Phys. Lett. 333, 485–492 (2001).
Auer, B., Kumar, R., Schmidt, J. R. & Skinner, J. L. Hydrogen bonding and Raman, IR, and 2D-IR spectroscopy of dilute HOD in liquid D2O. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 14215–14220 (2007).
Zones, S. I. Conversion of faujasites to high-silica chabazite SSZ-13 in the presence of N,N,N-trimethyl-1-adamantammonium Iodide. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 87, 3709–3716 (1991).
Zhou, T., Bai, P., Siepmann, J. I. & Clark, A. E. Deconstructing the confinement effect upon the organization and dynamics of water in hydrophobic nanoporous materials: lessons learned from zeolites. J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 22015–22024 (2017).
Fleys, M., Thompson, R. W. & MacDonald, J. C. Comparison of the behavior of water in silicalite and dealuminated zeolite Y at different temperatures by molecular dynamic simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 12197–12203 (2004).
Nguyen, V. T. et al. A comparative study of the adsorption of water and methanol in zeolite BEA: a molecular simulation study. Mol. Sim. 40, 1113–1124 (2014).
Godawat, R., Jamadagni, S. N. & Garde, S. Characterizing hydrophobicity of interfaces by using cavity formation, solute binding, and water correlations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 15119–15124 (2009).
Paulino, J. et al. Functional stability of water wire–carbonyl interactions in an ion channel. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 11908–11915 (2020).
Cheruzel, L. E. et al. Structures and solid-state dynamics of one-dimensional water chains stabilized by imidazole channels. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 42, 5452–5455 (2003).
Hummer, G., Rasaiah, J. C. & Noworyta, J. P. Water conduction through the hydrophobic channel of a carbon nanotube. Nature 414, 188–190 (2001).
Falk, K., Sedlmeier, F., Joly, L., Netz, R. R. & Bocquet, L. Molecular origin of fast water transport in carbon nanotube membranes: superlubricity versus curvature dependent friction. Nano Lett. 10, 4067–4073 (2010).
Salles, F. et al. Molecular insight into the adsorption and diffusion of water in the versatile hydrophilic/hydrophobic flexible MIL-53(Cr) MOF. J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 10764–10776 (2011).
Medders, G. R. & Paesani, F. Water dynamics in metal–organic frameworks: effects of heterogeneous confinement predicted by computational spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 2897–2902 (2014).
Rieth, A. J., Hunter, K. M., Dinca, M. & Paesani, F. Hydrogen bonding structure of confined water templated by a metal–organic framework with open metal sites. Nature Commun. 10, 4771 (2019).
Chakraborty, S., Kumar, H., Dasgupta, C. & Maiti, P. K. Confined water: structure, dynamics, and thermodynamics. Acc. Chem. Res. 50, 2139–2146 (2017).
Chandler, D. Interfaces and the driving force of hydrophobic assembly. Nature 437, 640–647 (2005).
Walrafen, G. E., Hokmabadi, M. S. & Yang, W. H. Raman isosbestic points from liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 85, 6964–6969 (1986).
Libnau, F. O., Kvalheim, O. M., Christy, A. A. & Toft, J. Spectra of water in the near- and mid-infrared region. Vib. Spectrosc. 7, 243–254 (1994).
McQuarrie, D. A. Statistical Mechanics (University Science Books, 2000).
Silverstein, K. A. T., Haymet, A. D. J. & Dill, K. A. The strength of hydrogen bonds in liquid water and around nonpolar solutes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 8037–8041 (2000).
Walrafen, G. E. & Chu, Y. C. Shear viscosity, heat capacity, and fluctuations of liquid water, all at constant molal volume. J. Phys. Chem. 95, 8909–8921 (1991).
Striolo, A. Nano-confined water. Theo. Comp. Chem. 18, 245–274 (2007).
Munoz-Santiburcio, D. & Marx, D. Chemistry in nanoconfined water. Chem. Sci. 8, 3444–3452 (2017).
Bregante, D. T. & Flaherty, D. W. Periodic trends in olefin epoxidation over group IV and V framework substituted zeolite catalysts: a kinetic and spectroscopic study. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 6888–6898 (2017).
Gounder, R. & Iglesia, E. The catalytic diversity of zeolites: confinement and solvation effects within voids of molecular dimensions. Chem. Commun. 49, 3491–3509 (2013).
Ardagh, M. A., Bregante, D. T., Flaherty, D. W. & Notestein, J. M. Controlled deposition of silica on titania–silica to alter the active site surroundings on epoxidation catalysts. ACS Catal. 10, 13008–13018 (2020).
Cremer, E. The compensation effect in heterogeneous catalysis. Adv. Catal. 7, 75–91 (1955).
Flaherty, D. W. & Iglesia, E. Transition-state enthalpy and entropy effects on reactivity and selectivity in hydrogenolysis of n-alkanes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 18586–18599 (2013).
Mellmer, M. A. et al. Solvent-enabled control of reactivity for liquid phase reactions of biomass-derived compounds. Nat. Catal. 1, 199–207 (2018).
Qin, Z. et al. Comparative study of Nano-ZSM-5 catalysts synthesized in OH- and F- media. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 257–264 (2014).
Grahn, M. et al. Small ZSM-5 crystals with low defect density as an effective catalyst for conversion of methanol to hydrocarbons. Catal. Today 345, 136–146 (2020).
Grosso-Giordano, N. A. et al. Outer-sphere control of catalysis on surfaces: a comparative study of Ti(IV) single-sites grafted on amorphous versus crystalline silicates for alkene epoxidation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 4956–4960 (2018).
Grosso-Giordano, N. A. et al. Dynamic reorganization and confinement of Ti(IV) active sites controls olefin epoxidation catalysis on two-dimensional zeotypes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 7090–7106 (2019).
Wang, L. et al. A significant enhancement of catalytic activities in oxidation with H2O2 over the TS-1 zeolite by adjusting the catalyst wettability. Chem. Commun. 50, 2012–2014 (2014).
Cordon, M. J. et al. The dominant role of entropy in stabilizing sugar isomerization transition states within hydrophobic zeolite pores. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 14244–14266 (2018).
Conrad, S., Wolf, P., Müller, P., Orsted, H. & Hermans, I. Influence of hydrophilicity on the Snβ-catalyzed Baeyer–Villiger oxidation of cyclohexanone with aqueous hydrogen peroxide. ChemCatChem 9, 175–182 (2017).
Blasco, T. et al. Direct synthesis and characterization of hydrophobic aluminum-free Ti-beta zeolite. J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 75–88 (1998).
Marler, B., Wang, Y., Song, J. & Gies, H. Topotactic condensation of layer silicates with ferrierite-type layers forming porous tectosilicates. Dalton Trans. 43, 10396–10416 (2014).
Doyle, W. M. Absorbance linearity and repeatability in cylindrical internal reflectance FT-IR spectroscopy of liquids. Appl. Spectrosc. 44, 50–59 (1990).
Hijar, C. A. et al. The Siting of Ti in TS-1 is non-random. Powder neutron diffraction studies and theoretical calculations of TS-1 and FeS-1. J. Phys. Chem. B 104, 12157–12164 (2000).
Horn, H. W. et al. Development of an improved four-site water model for biomolecular simulations: TIP4P-Ew. J. Chem. Phys. 120, 9665–9678 (2004).
Emami, F. S. et al. Force field and a surface model database for silica to simulate interfacial properties in atomic resolution. Chem. Mater. 26, 2647–2658 (2014).
Rappe, A. K., Casewit, C. J., Colwell, K. S., Goddard, W. A. III & Skiff, W. M. UFF, a full periodic table force field for molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics simulations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 10024–10035 (1992).
Case, D. et al. AMBER 18 (University of California, 2018).
Gotz, A. W. et al. Routine microsecond molecular dynamics simulations with AMBER on GPUs. 1. Generalized Born. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 8, 1542–1555 (2012).
Salomon-Ferrer, R., Gotz, A. W., Poole, D., Le Grand, S. & Walker, R. C. Routine microsecond molecular dynamics simulations with AMBER on GPUs. 2. Explicit solvent particle mesh Ewald. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 9, 3878–3888 (2013).
Berendsen, H. J. C., Postma, J. P. M., van Gunsteren, W. F., DiNola, A. & Haak, J. R. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J. Chem. Phys. 81, 3684–3690 (1984).
Kräutler, V., van Gunsteren, W. F. & Hünenberger, P. H. A fast SHAKE algorithm to solve distance constraint equations for small molecules in molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 22, 501–508 (2001).
York, D. M., Darden, T. A. & Pedersen, L. G. The effect of long‐range electrostatic interactions in simulations of macromolecular crystals: a comparison of the Ewald and truncated list methods. J. Chem. Phys. 99, 8345–8348 (1993).
Humphrey, W., Dalke, A. & Schulten, K. VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graphics 14, 33–38 (1996).
Roe, D. R. & Cheatham, T. E. III PTRAJ and CPPTRAJ: software for processing and analysis of molecular dynamics trajectory data. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 9, 3084–3095 (2013).
McGibbon, R. T. et al. MDTraj: A modern open library for the analysis of molecular dynamics trajectories. Biophys. J. 109, 1528–1532 (2015).
Jeffrey, G. A. An Introduction to Hydrogen Bonding Vol. 12 (Oxford Univ. Press, 1997).
Chorkendorff, I. & Niemantsverdriet, J. W. H. Concepts of Modern Catalysis and Kinetics 2nd edn (Wiley-VCH, 2007).
This work was supported by the Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under Award DE-SC0020224 (D.T.B., J.Z.T., E.Z.A. and D.W.F.). D.T.B. was also partially supported by the Department of Defense through the National Defense Science & Engineering Graduate (NDSEG) Fellowship Program and through a Dissertation Completion Fellowship from the University of Illinois. E.Z.A. was partially supported by the US Army Research Office (W911NF-18-1-0100). C.P.N. was supported by Honeywell UOP. This work was carried out, in part, in the Frederick Seitz Materials Research Laboratory. M.C.C. and D.S. acknowledge support from Blue Waters sustained-petascale computing project, which is supported by the National Science Foundation (awards OCI-0725070 and ACI-1238993), the State of Illinois and, as of December 2019, the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency. Blue Waters is a joint effort of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and its National Center for Supercomputing Applications.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Nature Catalysis thanks Daniel Resasco and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Figs. 1–18, Notes 1–14, Tables 1–9 and references.
Representative dynamics of water molecules within Ti-FAU-F from the final 25 ns of the classical MD simulation.
Representative dynamics of water molecules within Ti-FAU-OH from the final 25 ns of the classical MD simulation.
Representative dynamics of water molecules within Ti-BEA-F from the final 25 ns of the classical MD simulation.
Representative dynamics of water molecules within Ti-BEA-OH from the final 25 ns of the classical MD simulation.
Representative dynamics of water molecules within Ti-MFI-F from the final 25 ns of the classical MD simulation.
Representative dynamics of water molecules within Ti-MFI-OH from the final 25 ns of the classical MD simulation.
Representative dynamics of water molecules within Si-CDO-F from the final 25 ns of the classical MD simulation.
Representative dynamics of water molecules within Si-CDO-OH from the final 25 ns of the classical MD simulation.
About this article
Cite this article
Bregante, D.T., Chan, M.C., Tan, J.Z. et al. The shape of water in zeolites and its impact on epoxidation catalysis. Nat Catal 4, 797–808 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-021-00672-4