Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Redirecting dynamic surface restructuring of a layered transition metal oxide catalyst for superior water oxidation

Nature Catalysis volume 4, pages 212–222 (2021)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Rationally manipulating the in situ formed catalytically active surface of catalysts remains a tremendous challenge for a highly efficient water electrolysis. Here we present a cationic redox-tuning method to modulate in situ catalyst leaching and to redirect the dynamic surface restructuring of layered LiCoO2–xClx (x = 0, 0.1 or 0.2), for the electrochemical oxygen evolution reaction (OER). Chlorine doping lowered the potential to trigger in situ cobalt oxidation and lithium leaching, which induced the surface of LiCoO1.8Cl0.2 to transform into a self-terminated amorphous (oxy)hydroxide phase during the OER. In contrast, Cl-free LiCoO2 required higher electrochemical potentials to initiate the in situ surface reconstruction to spinel-type Li1±xCo2O4 and longer cycles to stabilize it. Surface-restructured LiCoO1.8Cl0.2 outperformed many state-of-the-art OER catalysts and demonstrated remarkable stability. This work makes a stride in modulating surface restructuring and in designing superior OER electrocatalysts via manipulating the in situ catalyst leaching.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Structural and compositional characterizations.
Fig. 2: Electronic configuration.
Fig. 3: OER performance in 1 M KOH.
Fig. 4: Operando XAFS test.
Fig. 5: Postmortem characterization of cycled LiCoO1.8Cl0.2.
Fig. 6: Theoretical understanding of Cl doping in redirecting surface restructuring.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Most data supporting the findings of this study are available from the main text of the article and its Supplementary Information. More data can be obtained from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Körner, A., Tam, C., Bennett, S. & Gagné, J. Technology Roadmap—Hydrogen and Fuel Cells (International Energy Agency, 2015).

  2. Jin, S. Are metal chalcogenides, nitrides, and phosphides oxygen evolution catalysts or bifunctional catalysts? ACS Energy Lett. 2, 1937–1938 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Suen, N.-T. et al. Electrocatalysis for the oxygen evolution reaction: recent development and future perspectives. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 337–365 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Song, F. et al. Transition metal oxides as electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction in alkaline solutions: an application-inspired renaissance. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 7748–7759 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Li, T. et al. Atomic-scale insights into surface species of electrocatalysts in three dimensions. Nat. Catal. 1, 300–305 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Friebel, D. et al. Identification of highly active Fe sites in (Ni,Fe)OOH for electrocatalytic water splitting. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 1305–1313 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Subbaraman, R. et al. Trends in activity for the water electrolyser reactions on 3d M(Ni,Co,Fe,Mn) hydr(oxy)oxide catalysts. Nat. Mater. 11, 550–557 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Man, I. C. et al. Universality in oxygen evolution electrocatalysis on oxide surfaces. ChemCatChem 3, 1159–1165 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Suntivich, J., May, K. J., Gasteiger, H. A., Goodenough, J. B. & Shao-Horn, Y. A perovskite oxide optimized for oxygen evolution catalysis from molecular orbital principles. Science 334, 1383–1385 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Grimaud, A. et al. Double perovskites as a family of highly active catalysts for oxygen evolution in alkaline solution. Nat. Commun. 4, 2439 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fabbri, E. et al. Dynamic surface self-reconstruction is the key of highly active perovskite nano-electrocatalysts for water splitting. Nat. Mater. 16, 925–931 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jiang, H., He, Q., Zhang, Y. & Song, L. Structural self-reconstruction of catalysts in electrocatalysis. Acc. Chem. Res. 51, 2968–2977 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bergmann, A. et al. Unified structural motifs of the catalytically active state of Co(oxyhydr)oxides during the electrochemical oxygen evolution reaction. Nat. Catal. 1, 711–719 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jiang, H. et al. Tracking structural self-reconstruction and identifying true active sites toward cobalt oxychloride precatalyst of oxygen evolution reaction. Adv. Mater. 31, 1805127 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bergmann, A. et al. Reversible amorphization and the catalytically active state of crystalline Co3O4 during oxygen evolution. Nat. Commun. 6, 8625 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Seitz, L. C. et al. A highly active and stable IrOx/SrIrO3 catalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction. Science 353, 1011–1014 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chung, D. Y. et al. Dynamic stability of active sites in hydr(oxy)oxides for the oxygen evolution reaction. Nat. Energy 5, 222–230 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Grimaud, A. et al. Activating lattice oxygen redox reactions in metal oxides to catalyse oxygen evolution. Nat. Chem. 9, 457–465 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hua, B. et al. Activating p-blocking centers in perovskite for efficient water splitting. Chem 4, 2902–2916 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang, J. et al. Water splitting with an enhanced bifunctional double perovskite. ACS Catal. 8, 364–371 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu, T. et al. Iron-facilitated dynamic active-site generation on spinel CoAl2O4 with self-termination of surface reconstruction for water oxidation. Nat. Catal. 2, 763–772 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang, S. et al. Spontaneous delithiation under operando condition triggers formation of an amorphous active layer in spinel cobalt oxides electrocatalyst toward oxygen evolution. ACS Catal. 9, 7389–7397 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Burke, M. S., Enman, L. J., Batchellor, A. S., Zou, S. & Boettcher, S. W. Oxygen evolution reaction electrocatalysis on transition metal oxides and (oxy)hydroxides: activity trends and design principles. Chem. Mater. 27, 7549–7558 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Burke, M. S., Kast, M. G., Trotochaud, L., Smith, A. M. & Boettcher, S. W. Cobalt–iron (oxy)hydroxide oxygen evolution electrocatalysts: the role of structure and composition on activity, stability, and mechanism. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 3638–3648 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Trotochaud, L., Young, S. L., Ranney, J. K. & Boettcher, S. W. Nickel–iron oxyhydroxide oxygen-evolution electrocatalysts: the role of intentional and incidental iron incorporation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 6744–6753 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zheng, X. et al. Electronic structure engineering of LiCoO2 toward enhanced oxygen electrocatalysis. Adv. Energy Mater. 9, 1803482 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Maiyalagan, T., Jarvis, K. A., Therese, S., Ferreira, P. J. & Manthiram, A. Spinel-type lithium cobalt oxide as a bifunctional electrocatalyst for the oxygen evolution and oxygen reduction reactions. Nat. Commun. 5, 3949 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gardner, G. P. et al. Structural requirements in lithium cobalt oxides for the catalytic oxidation of water. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 1616–1619 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lu, Z. et al. Electrochemical tuning of layered lithium transition metal oxides for improvement of oxygen evolution reaction. Nat. Commun. 5, 4345 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lu, Z. et al. Identifying the active surfaces of electrochemically tuned LiCoO2 for oxygen evolution reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 6270–6276 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ceder, G. & Van der Ven, A. Phase diagrams of lithium transition metal oxides: investigations from first principles. Electrochim. Acta 45, 131–150 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Meng, Y. S. & Arroyo-de Dompablo, M. E. First principles computational materials design for energy storage materials in lithium ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2, 589–609 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Gardner, G. et al. Structural basis for differing electrocatalytic water oxidation by the cubic, layered and spinel forms of lithium cobalt oxides. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 184–192 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lu, X. et al. New insight into the atomic structure of electrochemically delithiated O3-Li(1–x)CoO2 (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.5) nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 12, 6192–6197 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Li, G., Zhou, S., Wang, P. & Zhao, J. Halogen-doping in LiCoO2 cathode materials for Li-ion batteries: insights from ab initio calculations. RSC Adv. 5, 107326–107332 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kim, B.-J. et al. Functional role of Fe-doping in Co-based perovskite oxide catalysts for oxygen evolution reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 5231–5240 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Patridge, C. J., Love, C. T., Swider-Lyons, K. E., Twigg, M. E. & Ramaker, D. E. In-situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy analysis of capacity fade in nanoscale-LiCoO2. J. Solid State Chem. 203, 134–144 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Nakai, I. et al. X-ray absorption fine structure and neutron diffraction analyses of de-intercalation behavior in the LiCoO2 and LiNiO2 systems. J. Power Sources 68, 536–539 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Yoon, W.-S. et al. Oxygen contribution on Li-ion intercalation−deintercalation in LiCoO2 investigated by O K-edge and Co L-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 2526–2532 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Chen, C.-H. et al. Soft X-ray absorption spectroscopy studies on the chemically delithiated commercial LiCoO2 cathode material. J. Power Sources 174, 938–943 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Ismail, J., Ahmed, M. F. & Vishnu Kamath, P. Cyclic voltammetric studies of pure and doped films of cobalt hydroxide in 1 M KOH. J. Power Sources 36, 507–516 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Shan, X. et al. Bivalence Mn5O8 with hydroxylated interphase for high-voltage aqueous sodium-ion storage. Nat. Commun. 7, 13370 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Reimers, J. N. & Dahn, J. Electrochemical and in situ X-ray diffraction studies of lithium intercalation in LixCoO2. J. Electrochem. Soc. 139, 2091–2097 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Garcia, B., Farcy, J., Pereira-Ramos, J. & Baffier, N. Electrochemical properties of low temperature crystallized LiCoO2. J. Electrochem. Soc. 144, 1179–1184 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Baumung, M., Kollenbach, L., Xi, L. & Risch, M. Undesired bulk oxidation of LiMn2O4 increases overpotential of electrocatalytic water oxidation in lithium hydroxide electrolytes. ChemPhysChem 20, 2981–2988 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhou, J. et al. Voltage- and time-dependent valence state transition in cobalt oxide catalysts during the oxygen evolution reaction. Nat. Commun. 11, 1984 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Yang, W. & Devereaux, T. P. Anionic and cationic redox and interfaces in batteries: advances from soft X-ray absorption spectroscopy to resonant inelastic scattering. J. Power Sources 389, 188–197 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhang, J.-N. et al. Trace doping of multiple elements enables stable battery cycling of LiCoO2 at 4.6 V. Nat. Energy 4, 594–603 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Grimaud, A., Hong, W. T., Shao-Horn, Y. & Tarascon, J.-M. Anionic redox processes for electrochemical devices. Nat. Mater. 15, 121–126 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Lee, S. W. et al. The nature of lithium battery materials under oxygen evolution reaction conditions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 16959–16962 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Newville, M. IFEFFIT: interactive XAFS analysis and FEFF fitting. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 8, 322–324 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Zhou, F., Cococcioni, M., Marianetti, C. A., Morgan, D. & Ceder, G. First-principles prediction of redox potentials in transition-metal compounds with LDA + U. Phys. Rev. B 70, 23521 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Yu, M. & Trinkle, D. R. Accurate and efficient algorithm for Bader charge integration. J. Chem. Phys. 134, 064111 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Bajdich, M., García-Mota, M., Vojvodic, A., Nørskov, J. K. & Bell, A. T. Theoretical investigation of the activity of cobalt oxides for the electrochemical oxidation of water. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 13521–13530 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Su, D., Dou, S. & Wang, G. Single crystalline Co3O4 nanocrystals exposed with different crystal planes for Li–O2 batteries. Sci. Rep. 4, 5767 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Reikowski, F. et al. Operando surface X-ray diffraction studies of structurally defined Co3O4 and CoOOH thin films during oxygen evolution. ACS Catal. 9, 3811–3821 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. García-Mota, M. et al. Importance of correlation in determining electrocatalytic oxygen evolution activity on cobalt oxides. J. Phys. Chem. C. 116, 21077–21082 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Monkhorst, H. J. & Pack, J. D. Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188–5192 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Mathew, K., Sundararaman, R., Letchworth-Weaver, K., Arias, T. & Hennig, R. G. Implicit solvation model for density-functional study of nanocrystal surfaces and reaction pathways. J. Chem. Phys. 140, 084106 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grants funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (no. NRF-2018M1A2A2063868, no. NRF-2019R1A4A1025848, no. NRF-2019M3E6A1065102, no. 2015M3D1A1070639, and no. NRF-2018R1C1B6006854). J. Lim also acknowledges support from the Samsung Science and Technology Foundation under project no. SRFC-MA2002-04. We express thanks to the staff and crew of the Seoul National University Electron Microscopy Facility (NCIRF), Research Institute of Advanced Materials (RIAM), the Institute of Applied Physics of Seoul National University and the Seoul National University Co-operative Flexible Transformative (SOFT) Foundry. J.W. gratefully acknowledges the SNU Science Fellowship (NRF-2019R1A6A1A10073437) funded by the Korean government (MSIT).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemistry, College of Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Jian Wang, Subin Choi, Jeongwoo Han, Sugeun Jo, Juwon Kim, Hwiho Kim & Jongwoo Lim

  2. Department of Chemistry, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea

    Se-Jun Kim & Hyungjun Kim

  3. Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China

    Jiapeng Liu & Francesco Ciucci

  4. College of Materials Science and Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, China

    Yang Gao

  5. Graduate School of Energy Science and Technology (GEST), Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea

    Hyeyoung Shin

  6. Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China

    Francesco Ciucci

  7. Advanced Light Source, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA

    Qingtian Li & Wanli Yang

  8. Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Nano-Micro Material Research, School of Chemical Biology and Biotechnology, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen, China

    Xia Long & Shihe Yang

  9. National Center for Inter-University Research Facilities, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Sung-Pyo Cho

  10. Beamline Research Division, Pohang Accelerator Laboratory, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang, Republic of Korea

    Keun Hwa Chae & Min Gyu Kim

Authors
  1. Jian Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Se-Jun Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jiapeng Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yang Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Subin Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jeongwoo Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hyeyoung Shin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Sugeun Jo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Juwon Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Francesco Ciucci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Hwiho Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Qingtian Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Wanli Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Xia Long
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Shihe Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Sung-Pyo Cho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Keun Hwa Chae
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Min Gyu Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Hyungjun Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Jongwoo Lim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.W. contributed to the experimental planning, sample preparation, electrochemical experiments, synchrotron-based experiments, data analysis and manuscript preparation. S.-J.K., Y.G., H.S. and Hyungjun Kim conducted the DFT calculations and contributed to manuscript preparation. S.C., K.H.C., J.K. and M.G.K. supported the operando XAFS and ex situ sXAS experiments. J.H. and S.-P.C. conducted the TEM/STEM analysis. S.J. and Hwiho Kim contributed to the ICP-MS and XPS tests. Q.L. and W.Y. performed the RIXS experiments. J. Liu., F.C., X.L. and S.Y. assisted with the sample preparation, electrochemical test, data acquisition and analysis. J. Lim. supervised the project and contributed to the experimental planning, data analysis and manuscript preparation. All authors reviewed and commented on the manuscript before publication.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jian Wang, Shihe Yang, Hyungjun Kim or Jongwoo Lim.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Catalysis thanks Marcel Risch, Kirsten Winther and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–40, Tables 1–11 and Notes 1–7.

Supplementary Data

DFT-optimized structures.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, J., Kim, SJ., Liu, J. et al. Redirecting dynamic surface restructuring of a layered transition metal oxide catalyst for superior water oxidation. Nat Catal 4, 212–222 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-021-00578-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-021-00578-1

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing