Abstract
The high catalytic performance of core–shell nanoparticles is usually attributed to their distinct geometric and electronic structures. Here we reveal a dynamic mechanism that overturns this conventional understanding by a direct environmental transmission electron microscopy visualization coupled with multiple state-of-the-art in situ techniques, which include synchrotron X-ray absorption spectroscopy, infrared spectroscopy and theoretical simulations. A Ni–Au catalytic system, which exhibits a highly selective CO production in CO2 hydrogenation, features an intact ultrathin Au shell over the Ni core before and after the reaction. However, the catalytic performance could not be attributed to the Au shell surface, but rather to the formation of a transient reconstructed alloy surface, promoted by CO adsorption during the reaction. The discovery of such a reversible transformation urges us to reconsider the reaction mechanism beyond the stationary model, and may have important implications not only for core–shell nanoparticles, but also for other well-defined nanocatalysts.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Probing the atomically diffuse interfaces in Pd@Pt core-shell nanoparticles in three dimensions
Nature Communications Open Access 22 May 2023
-
Ptn–Ov synergistic sites on MoOx/γ-Mo2N heterostructure for low-temperature reverse water–gas shift reaction
Nature Communications Open Access 03 October 2022
-
Heterogeneous Catalysis for CO2 Conversion into Chemicals and Fuels
Transactions of Tianjin University Open Access 09 August 2022
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout



Data availability
All the data needed to support the plots and evaluate the conclusions within this article are present within it, the Supplementary Information or the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (deposition no. CSD 1979031-1979068), or are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Change history
19 January 2021
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-021-00579-0
References
Hansen, P. L. et al. Atom-resolved imaging of dynamic shape changes in supported copper nanocrystals. Science 295, 2053–2055 (2002).
Nolte, P. et al. Shape changes of supported Rh nanoparticles during oxidation and reduction cycles. Science 321, 1654–1658 (2008).
Yoshida, H. et al. Visualizing gas molecules interacting with supported nanoparticulate catalysts at reaction conditions. Science 335, 317–319 (2012).
Xin, H. L. et al. Revealing the atomic restructuring of Pt–Co nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 14, 3203–3207 (2014).
Wei, X. et al. Geometrical structure of the gold–iron(iii) oxide interfacial perimeter for CO oxidation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 11289–11293 (2018).
Gawande, M. B. et al. Core–shell nanoparticles: synthesis and applications in catalysis and electrocatalysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 7540–7590 (2015).
Bhattarai, N., Casillas, G., Ponce, A. & Jose-Yacaman, M. Strain-release mechanisms in bimetallic core–shell nanoparticles as revealed by Cs-corrected STEM. Surf. Sci. 609, 161–166 (2013).
Bu, L. et al. Biaxially strained PtPb/Pt core/shell nanoplate boosts oxygen reduction catalysis. Science 354, 1410–1414 (2016).
Tedsree, K. et al. Hydrogen production from formic acid decomposition at room temperature using a Ag–Pd core–shell nanocatalyst. Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 302–307 (2011).
Tao, F. et al. Reaction-driven restructuring of Rh–Pd and Pt–Pd core–shell nanoparticles. Science 322, 932–934 (2008).
Zhan, W. C. et al. Crystal structural effect of AuCu alloy nanoparticles on catalytic CO oxidation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 8846–8854 (2017).
Chi, M. F. et al. Surface faceting and elemental diffusion behaviour at atomic scale for alloy nanoparticles during in situ annealing. Nat. Commun. 6, 8925 (2015).
Wang, F. et al. Tourmaline-modified FeMnTiOx catalysts for improved low-temperature NH3-SCR performance. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 6989–6996 (2019).
Vara, M. et al. Understanding the thermal stability of palladium–platinum core–shell nanocrystals by in situ transmission electron microscopy and density functional theory. ACS Nano 11, 4571–4581 (2017).
Wu, C. H. et al. Bimetallic synergy in cobalt–palladium nanocatalysts for CO oxidation. Nat. Catal. 2, 78–85 (2019).
Su, D. S., Zhang, B. & Schlogl, R. Electron microscopy of solid catalysts—transforming from a challenge to a toolbox. Chem. Rev. 115, 2818–2882 (2015).
Wang, D. & Li, Y. One-pot protocol for Au-based hybrid magnetic nanostructures via a noble-metal-induced reduction process. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 6280–6281 (2010).
Duan, S., Wang, R. & Liu, J. Stability investigation of a high number density Pt1/Fe2O3 single-atom catalyst under different gas environments by HAADF-STEM. Nanotechnology 29, 204002 (2018).
Scherzer, O. The theoretical resolution limit of the electron microscope. J. Appl. Phys. 20, 20–29 (1949).
Pennycook, S. J. & Boatner, L. A. Chemically sensitive structure-imaging with a scanning transmission electron microscope. Nature 336, 565–567 (1988).
Williams, D. B. & Carter, C. B. (eds) Transmission Electron Microscopy: A Textbook for Materials Science 483–506 (Springer, 1996).
Hansen, T. W. & Wagner, J. B. Catalysts under controlled atmospheres in the transmission electron microscope. ACS Catal. 4, 1673–1685 (2014).
Xin, H. L., Niu, K., Alsem, D. H. & Zheng, H. In situ TEM study of catalytic nanoparticle reactions in atmospheric pressure gas environment. Microsc. Microanal. 19, 1558–1568 (2013).
Takenaka, S., Kobayashi, S., Ogihara, H. & Otsuka, K. Ni/SiO2 catalyst effective for methane decomposition into hydrogen and carbon nanofiber. J. Catal. 217, 79–87 (2003).
Liu, X. et al. Structural changes of Au–Cu bimetallic catalysts in CO oxidation: in situ XRD, EPR, XANES, and FT-IR characterizations. J. Catal. 278, 288–296 (2011).
Ueckert, T., Lamber, R., Jaeger, N. I. & Schubert, U. Strong metal support interactions in a Ni/SiO2 catalyst prepared via sol–gel synthesis. Appl. Catal. A 155, 75–85 (1997).
Beniya, A., Isomura, N., Hirata, H. & Watanabe, Y. Low temperature adsorption and site-conversion process of CO on the Ni(111) surface. Surf. Sci. 606, 1830–1836 (2012).
Lang, R. et al. Non defect-stabilized thermally stable single-atom catalyst. Nat. Commun. 10, 234 (2019).
Yang, F., Yao, Y., Yan, Z., Min, H. & Goodman, D. W. Preparation and characterization of planar Ni–Au bimetallic model catalysts. Appl. Surf. Sci. 283, 263–268 (2013).
Mihaylov, M., Knözinger, H., Hadjiivanov, K. & Gates, B. C. Characterization of the oxidation states of supported gold species by IR spectroscopy of adsorbed CO. Chem. Ing. Tech. 79, 795–806 (2007).
Ruban, A. V., Skriver, H. L. & Nørskov, J. K. Surface segregation energies in transition-metal alloys. Phys. Rev. B 59, 15990–16000 (1999).
Swiatkowska-Warkocka, Z., Pyatenko, A., Krok, F., Jany, B. R. & Marszalek, M. Synthesis of new metastable nanoalloys of immiscible metals with a pulse laser technique. Sci. Rep. 5, 9849 (2015).
Liu, W., Sun, K. & Wang, R. In situ atom-resolved tracing of element diffusion in NiAu nanospindles. Nanoscale 5, 5067–5072 (2013).
Porosoff, M. D., Yan, B. & Chen, J. G. Catalytic reduction of CO2 by H2 for synthesis of CO, methanol and hydrocarbons: challenges and opportunities. Energ. Environ. Sci. 9, 62–73 (2016).
Duan, S. & Wang, R. Au/Ni12P5 core/shell nanocrystals from bimetallic heterostructures: in situ synthesis, evolution and supercapacitor properties. NPG Asia Mater. 6, e122 (2014).
Wong, A., Liu, Q., Griffin, S., Nicholls, A. & Regalbuto, J. R. Synthesis of ultrasmall, homogeneously alloyed, bimetallic nanoparticles on silica supports. Science 358, 1427–1430 (2017).
Acknowledgements
This work received financial support from Talents Innovation Project of Dalian (2016RD04), CAS Youth Innovation Promotion Association (2019190) and the Natural Science Foundation of China (21773287, 11604357, 21872145, 21902019, 11574340 and 51874115); G.Z. and J.T.M. were supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Cooperative Agreement no. EEC-1647722. G.Z. also acknowledges the Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities (DUT18RC(3)057). B.Z. thanks the financial support of the Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS, Grant no. ZDBS-LY-7012. Use of the Advanced Photon Source was supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under contract no. DE-AC02-06CH11357. MRCAT operations, beamline 10-BM, are supported by the Department of Energy and the MRCAT member institutions; the computational resources utilized in this research were provided by the National Supercomputing Center in Guangzhou (NSCC-GZ), Tianjin and Shanghai. In situ TEM work was also supported by NSFC 21802065 and was partially conducted at the picocenter of SUSTech CRF that receives funding from the Shenzhen government. We especially acknowledge H. Matsumoto and C. Zeng from Hitachi High-Technologies Co., Ltd, for the in situ STEM characterization; S. Liu from Dalian Jiaotong University for the focusing filtering and alignment on HRTEM images via scripting. This work is dedicated to the late D. Su for his valuable support and discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The project was conceived by W.L. X.Z. performed the catalyst preparation, FTIR and partial TEM characterizations and data analysis under the supervision of W.L. S.H. and M.G. conducted part of the ETEM experiments and data analysis. B.Z., X.L. and Y.G. conducted the mechanism analysis via DFT calculations as well as the manuscript preparation. G.Z. and J.T.M. performed the in situ XAS measurements and structure analysis. Z.W. contributed to the catalyst preparation and reaction measurements. B.Y. performed part of the FTIR experiments and data analysis. Y.L., W.B. and O.E. conducted the in situ TEM experiment under atmospheric pressure.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary methods, discussion, Figs. 1–20, Tables 1 and 2, and references.
Supplementary Video 1
In situ TEM video of the heating process at a pressure of ~9 mbar of 25% CO2 + 75% H2 from 500 to 600 °C at ×50 playback speed.
Supplementary Video 2
In situ TEM video of the cooling process at a pressure of ~9 mbar of 25% CO2 + 75% H2 from 600 to 400 °C at ×50 playback speed.
Supplementary Video 3
In situ SAED video of the heating process at a pressure of ~9 mbar of 25% CO2 + 75% H2 from 300 to 500 °C at ×10 playback speed.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, X., Han, S., Zhu, B. et al. Reversible loss of core–shell structure for Ni–Au bimetallic nanoparticles during CO2 hydrogenation. Nat Catal 3, 411–417 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-020-0440-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-020-0440-2
This article is cited by
-
Probing the atomically diffuse interfaces in Pd@Pt core-shell nanoparticles in three dimensions
Nature Communications (2023)
-
Time-resolved transmission electron microscopy for nanoscale chemical dynamics
Nature Reviews Chemistry (2023)
-
Oxidation-induced phase separation of carbon-supported CuAu nanoparticles for electrochemical reduction of CO2
Nano Research (2023)
-
Direct environmental TEM observation of silicon diffusion-induced strong metal-silica interaction for boosting CO2 hydrogenation
Nano Research (2023)
-
Ensemble effect for single-atom, small cluster and nanoparticle catalysts
Nature Catalysis (2022)