Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Deciphering the enzymatic mechanism of sugar ring contraction in UDP-apiose biosynthesis

Abstract

The C-branched pentose sugar d-apiose is important for plant cell wall development. Its biosynthesis as urdine diphosphate-d-apiose (UDP-d-apiose) involves decarboxylation of the UDP-d-glucuronic acid precursor coupled with pyranosyl-to-furanosyl sugar ring contraction. This unusual multistep reaction is catalysed in a single active site by UDP-d-apiose/UDP-d-xylose synthase (UAXS). Here we decipher the UAXS catalytic mechanism on the basis of crystal structures of the enzyme (which is from Arabidopsis thaliana), molecular dynamics simulations that are expanded by hybrid quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics calculations and mutational mechanistic analyses. Our studies show how UAXS uniquely integrates a classical catalytic cycle of oxidation and reduction by a tightly bound nicotinamide co-enzyme with retroaldol/aldol chemistry for the sugar ring contraction. We further demonstrate that decarboxylation occurs only after the sugar ring opening and identify that the thiol group of Cys100 steers the sugar skeleton rearrangement by proton transfer to and from C3′. The mechanistic features of UAXS highlight the evolutionary expansion of the basic catalytic apparatus of short-chain dehydrogenases/reductases for functional versatility in sugar biosynthesis.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: The proposed mechanism of UAXS.
Fig. 2: Crystallographic analysis of the three-dimensional structure of UAXS from Arabidopsis thaliana.
Fig. 3: The positioning of the UDP-GlcA substrate for catalytic oxidation and ring opening at the active site of UAXS, as revealed by QM/MM calculations.
Fig. 4: Deuterium incorporation at C3′ during the conversion of 2 by the wild-type, C100A and C100S forms of UAXS.
Fig. 5: The reaction of UAXS with 5 to study ring opening and reduction by the enzyme.
Fig. 6: The proposed enzymatic mechanism of UAXS.

Data availability

Coordinates and structure factors have been deposited with the Protein Data Bank with accession codes 6H0N and 6H0P. All other data are available from the authors on reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Picmanova, M. & Moller, B. L. Apiose: one of nature’s witty games. Glycobiology 26, 430–442 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Smith, J. et al. Functional characterization of UDP-apiose synthases from bryophytes and green algae provides insight into the appearance of apiose-containing glycans during plant evolution. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 21434–21447 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Carter, M. S. et al. Functional assignment of multiple catabolic pathways for d-apiose. Nat. Chem. Biol. 14, 696–705 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Smith, J. A. & Bar-Peled, M. Synthesis of UDP-apiose in bacteria: the marine phototroph Geminicoccus roseus and the plant pathogen Xanthomonas pisi. PLoS One 12, e0184953 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Matsunaga, T. et al. Occurrence of the primary cell wall polysaccharide rhamnogalacturonan II in pteridophytes, lycophytes, and bryophytes. Implications for the evolution of vascular plants. Plant Physiol. 134, 339–351 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Molhoj, M., Verma, R. & Reiter, W. D. The biosynthesis of the branched-chain sugar d-apiose in plants: functional cloning and characterization of a UDP-d-apiose/UDP-d-xylose synthase from Arabidopsis. Plant J. 35, 693–703 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ndeh, D. et al. Complex pectin metabolism by gut bacteria reveals novel catalytic functions. Nature 544, 65–70 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kim, M., Kang, S. & Rhee, Y. H. De novo synthesis of furanose sugars: catalytic asymmetric synthesis of apiose and apiose-containing oligosaccharides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 9733–9737 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Picken, J. M. & Mendicino, J. The biosynthesis of d-apiose in Lemna minor. J. Biol. Chem. 242, 1629–1634 (1967).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Sandermann, H. Jr., Tisue, G. T. & Grisebach, H. Biosynthesis of d-apiose. IV. Formation of UDP-apiose from UDP-d-glucuronic acid in cell-free extracts of parsley (Apium petroselinum L.) and Lemna minor. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 165, 550–552 (1968).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Choi, S. H., Ruszczycky, M. W., Zhang, H. & Liu, H. W. A fluoro analogue of UDP-α-d-glucuronic acid is an inhibitor of UDP-α-d-apiose/UDP-α-d-xylose synthase. Chem. Commun. 47, 10130–10132 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Choi, S. H. et al. Analysis of UDP-d-apiose/UDP-d-xylose synthase-catalyzed conversion of UDP-d-apiose phosphonate to UDP-d-xylose phosphonate: implications for a retroaldol-aldol mechanism. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 13946–13949 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Eixelsberger, T. et al. Isotope probing of the UDP-apiose/UDP-xylose synthase reaction: evidence of a mechanism via a coupled oxidation and aldol cleavage. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 2503–2507 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Mendicino, J. & Abouissa, H. Conversion of UDP-d-glucuronic acid to UDP-d-apiose and UDP-d-xylose by an enzyme isolated from Lemna minor. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 364, 159–172 (1974).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Kelleher, W. J. & Grisebach, H. Hydride transfer in the biosynthesis of uridine diphospho-apiose from uridine diphospho-d-glucuronic acid with an enzyme preparation of Lemna minor. Eur. J. Biochem. 23, 136–142 (1971).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Baron, D. & Grisebach, H. Further studies on the mechanism of action of UDP‐apiose/UDP‐xylose synthase from cell cultures of parsley. FEBS J. 38, 153–159 (1973).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Gebb, C., Baron, D. & Grisebach, H. Spectroscopic evidence for the formation of a 4-keto intermediate in the UDP-apiose/UDP-xylose synthase reaction. Eur. J. Biochem. 54, 493–498 (1975).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kelleher, W. J., Baron, D., Ortmann, R. & Grisebach, H. Proof for the origin of the branch hydroxymethyl carbon of d-apiose from carbon 3 of d-glucuronic acid. FEBS Lett 22, 203–204 (1972).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Guyett, P., Glushka, J., Gu, X. & Bar-Peled, M. Real-time NMR monitoring of intermediates and labile products of the bifunctional enzyme UDP-apiose/UDP-xylose synthase. Carbohydr. Res. 344, 1072–1078 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Persson, B. et al. The SDR (short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase and related enzymes) nomenclature initiative. Chem. Biol. Interact. 178, 94–98 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kavanagh, K. L., Jornvall, H., Persson, B. & Oppermann, U. Medium- and short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase gene and protein families: the SDR superfamily: functional and structural diversity within a family of metabolic and regulatory enzymes. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 65, 3895–3906 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Jornvall, H. et al. Short-chain dehydrogenases/reductases (SDR). Biochemistry 34, 6003–6013 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Filling, C. et al. Critical residues for structure and catalysis in short-chain dehydrogenases/reductases. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 25677–25684 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Thibodeaux, C. J., Melancon, C. E. & Liu, H. W. Natural-product sugar biosynthesis and enzymatic glycodiversification. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 9814–9859 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Eixelsberger, T. et al. Structure and mechanism of human UDP-xylose synthase: evidence for a promoting role of sugar ring distortion in a three-step catalytic conversion of UDP-glucuronic acid. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 31349–31358 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Bar-Peled, M., Griffith, C. L. & Doering, T. L. Functional cloning and characterization of a UDP-glucuronic acid decarboxylase: the pathogenic fungus Cryptococcus neoformans elucidates UDP-xylose synthesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 98, 12003–12008 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Gatzeva-Topalova, P. Z., May, A. P. & Sousa, M. C. Crystal structure of Escherichia coli ArnA (PmrI) decarboxylase domain. A key enzyme for lipid A modification with 4-amino-4-deoxy-l-arabinose and polymyxin resistance. Biochemistry 43, 13370–13379 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Polizzi, S. J. et al. Human UDP-α-d-xylose synthase and Escherichia coli ArnA conserve a conformational shunt that controls whether xylose or 4-keto-xylose is produced. Biochemistry 51, 8844–8855 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Matern, U. & Grisebach, H. UDP-apiose/UDP-xylose synthase. Subunit composition and binding studies. Eur. J. Biochem. 74, 303–312 (1977).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Gatzeva-Topalova, P. Z., May, A. P. & Sousa, M. C. Structure and mechanism of ArnA: conformational change implies ordered dehydrogenase mechanism in key enzyme for polymyxin resistance. Structure 13, 929–942 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Pfeiffer, M. et al. A parsimonious mechanism of sugar dehydration by human GDP-mannose-4,6-dehydratase. ACS Catal. 9, 2962–2968 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Gerratana, B., Cleland, W. W. & Frey, P. A. Mechanistic roles of Thr134, Tyr160, and Lys 164 in the reaction catalyzed by dTDP-glucose 4,6-dehydratase. Biochemistry 40, 9187–9195 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Kirschner, K. N. et al. GLYCAM06: a generalizable biomolecular force field. Carbohydrates. J. Comput. Chem. 29, 622–655 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Berger, E. et al. Acid-base catalysis by UDP-galactose 4-epimerase: correlations of kinetically measured acid dissociation constants with thermodynamic values for tyrosine 149. Biochemistry 40, 6699–6705 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Baron, D. & Grisebach, H. Further studies on mechanism of action of UDP-apiose/UDP-xylose synthase from cell-cultures of parsley. Eur. J. Biochem. 38, 153–159 (1973).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Fujimori, T. et al. Practical preparation of UDP-apiose and its applications for studying apiosyltransferase. Carbohydr. Res. 477, 20–25 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The contributions of P. Scudieri (enzyme characterization), A. Lepak (UDP-apiose HPLC assay) and J. Coines (analysis of MD trajectories) are gratefully acknowledged. This work was supported by the Federal Ministry of Science, Research and Economy (BMWFW), the Federal Ministry of Traffic, Innovation and Technology (bmvit), the Styrian Business Promotion Agency SFG, the Standortagentur Tirol, and the Government of Lower Austrian and Business Agency Vienna through the COMET-funding programme managed by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency FFG. Funding from the Austrian Science Funds (FWF; I-3247 to B.N. and A.J.E.B.) and by the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (MIUR) (Dipartimenti di Eccellenza Program (2018–2022)—Department of Biology and Biotechnology ‘L. Spallanzani’ University of Pavia) is acknowledged.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.S. performed protein crystallization and determined the structures. K.D.D., M.P. and C.R. performed MD simulations and QM calculations, and, with A.J.E.B., analysed the data. A.D., with F. de G. and A.J.E.B., designed enzyme variants and performed biochemical characterization. A.D., A.J.E.B. and H.W. performed the NMR analyses. A.J.E.B. performed substrate synthesis and product isolation. A.J.E.B. and A.D. performed the mechanistic analyses. B.N. and A.M. designed and supervised the research. The manuscript was written with contributions from all authors. B.N., A.D., A.M. S.S. and A.J.E.B. wrote the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Andrea Mattevi or Bernd Nidetzky.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Methods, Table 1, Figs. 1–47 and references

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Video 1

Motions of the UAXS active site during MD simulations (replica 1)

Supplementary Video 2

Motions of the UAXS active site during MD simulations (replica 2)

Supplementary Data 1

Initial coordinates for replica 1

Supplementary Data 2

Initial coordinates for replica 2

Supplementary Data 3

Final coordinates after 300 ns of MD simulations for replica 1

Supplementary Data 4

Final coordinates after 300 ns of MD simulations for replica 2

Supplementary Data 5

QM/MM optimized geometry of the QM region of the QM/MM calculation in the XYZ file format for a snapshot taken from the MD of replica 1

Supplementary Data 6

QM/MM optimized geometry of the QM region of the QM/MM calculation in the XYZ file format, the snapshot is taken from the MD for replica 2

Supplementary Data 7

Snapshot from replica 1 used for QM/MM calculations, it represents the Michaelis complex before QM/MM optimization

Supplementary Data 8

Snapshot from replica 2 used for QM/MM calculations, it represents the complex before QM/MM optimization

Supplementary Data 9

QM/MM optimized geometry of the entire complex including the QM and MM region from the QM/MM calculation in the XYZ file format, the snapshot was taken from the MD of replica 1.

Supplementary Data 10

QM/MM optimized geometry of the entire complex including the QM and MM region of the QM/MM calculation in the XYZ file format, the snapshot was taken from the MD of replica 2

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Savino, S., Borg, A.J.E., Dennig, A. et al. Deciphering the enzymatic mechanism of sugar ring contraction in UDP-apiose biosynthesis. Nat Catal 2, 1115–1123 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-019-0382-8

Download citation

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing