Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Engineered enzymes that retain and regenerate their cofactors enable continuous-flow biocatalysis

Nature Catalysis volume 2, pages 1006–1015 (2019)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Biocatalysis is an attractive route for the synthesis of complex organic molecules, such as pharmaceuticals, due to the properties of enzymes (high specificity and high catalytic rate). Ideally, we would be able to use enzymes in continuous-flow reactors to benefit from the advantages of continuous-flow chemistry (flexibility, control, product stream purity, low capital cost and improved yields for some reactions). However, continuous-flow applications for biocatalysis face substantial technical obstacles, particularly for enzymes that require cofactors. In the work presented here we tackle two of these obstacles: the provision of cofactor and cofactor recycling in flow, and enzyme immobilization without loss of activity. This is achieved through the production of modular biocatalysts that retain and recycle their cofactors, and that allow orthogonal, site-specific covalent conjugation to a surface. This generalizable engineering approach allowed us to build a complex, multistep flow reactor that outperforms previously published systems for cofactor-dependent continuous-flow biocatalysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Biocatalyst design.
Fig. 2: Reactor design for the conversion of glycerol to a chiral d-fagomine precursor.
Fig. 3: Synthesis of d-fagomine from glycerol.

Similar content being viewed by others

Article 24 June 2021

Elizabeth L. Bell, William Finnigan, … Sabine L. Flitsch

Data availability

The data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The gene sequences for constructs reported in this work have been deposited at GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/) under the accession numbers: MK910748, MK910749, MK910750, MK910751, MK910752, MK910753, MK910754, MK910755, MK910756, MK910757 and Q07159.

References

  1. Wells, A. & Meyer, H.-P. Biocatalysis as a strategic green technology for the chemical industry. ChemCatChem 6, 918–920 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Turner, N. J. & O’Reilly, E. Biocatalytic retrosynthesis. Nat. Chem. Biol. 9, 285–288 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gandomkar, S., Żądło-Dobrowolska, A. & Kroutil, W. Extending designed linear biocatalytic cascades for organic synthesis. ChemCatChem 11, 225–243 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tamborini, L., Fernandes, P., Paradisi, F. & Molinari, F. Flow bioreactors as complementary tools for biocatalytic process intensification. Trend Biotechnol. 36, 73–88 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang, Y.-H. P., Sun, J. & Ma, Y. Biomanufacturing: history and perspective. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 44, 773–784 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Santacoloma, P. A. & Woodley, J. M. in Cascade Biocatalysis (eds Riva, S. & Fessner, W. -D.) 231–248 (Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2014).

  7. Weiser, D. et al. i n Biocatalysis: An Industrial Perspective (eds Gonzalo G. & de María, P) 397–430 (Royal Society of Chemistry, 2018).

  8. Thompson, M. P., Peñafiel, I., Cosgrove, S. C. & Turner, N. J. Biocatalysis using immobilized enzymes in continuous flow for the synthesis of fine chemicals. Org. Process Res. Dev. 23, 9–18 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dudley, Q. M., Karim, A. S. & Jewett, M. C. Cell-free metabolic engineering: biomanufacturing beyond the cell. Biotechnol. J. 10, 69–82 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. López-Gallego, F., Jackson, E. & Betancor, L. Heterogeneous systems biocatalysis: the path to the fabrication of self-sufficient artificial metabolic cells. Chem.: Eur. J. 23, 17841–17849 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Akio Nakamura, H. M., Itaru, Urabe & Hirosuke, Okada Properties of glucose-dehydrogenase-poly(ethyleneglycol)-NAD conjugate as an NADH-regeneration unit in enzyme reactors. J. Ferment. Technol. 66, 267–272 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fu, J. et al. Multi-enzyme complexes on DNA scaffolds capable of substrate channelling with an artificial swinging arm. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 531–536 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Krzek, M., van Beek, H. L., Permentier, H. P., Bischoff, R. & Fraaije, M. W. Covalent immobilization of a flavoprotein monooxygenase via its flavin cofactor. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 82, 138–143 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Susana, V. L., Benítez-Mateos, A. I. & Fernando, L. G. Co‐immobilized phosphorylated cofactors and enzymes as self‐sufficient heterogeneous biocatalysts for chemical processes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 771–775 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Keatinge-Clay, A. T. Stereocontrol within polyketide assembly lines. Nat. Prod. Rep. 33, 141–149 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dutta, S. et al. Structure of a modular polyketide synthase. Nature 510, 512–517 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nguyen, C. et al. Trapping the dynamic acyl carrier protein in fatty acid biosynthesis. Nature 505, 427–431 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cronan, J. E., Zhao, X. & Jiang, Y. F. attachment and synthesis of lipoic acid in Escherichia coli. Adv. Microb. Physiol. 50, 103–146 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Davies, S. G., Fletcher, A. M., Kennedy, M. S., Roberts, P. M. & Thomson, J. E. Asymmetric synthesis of D-fagomine and its diastereoisomers. Tetrahedron 74, 7261–7271 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Castillo, J. A. et al. Fructose-6-phosphate aldolase in organic synthesis: preparation of D-fagomine, N-alkylated derivatives, and preliminary biological assays. Org. Let. 8, 6067–6070 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hartley, C. J. et al. Sugar analog synthesis by in vitro biocatalytic cascade: a comparison of alternative enzyme complements for dihydroxyacetone phosphate production as a precursor to rare chiral sugar synthesis. PLoS ONE 12, e0184183 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Minařik, A. et al. Ligand-Directed immobilization of proteins through an esterase 2 fusion tag studied by atomic force microscopy. ChemBioChem 9, 124–130 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Huang, Y., Humenik, M. & Sprinzl, M. Esterase 2 from Alicyclobacillus acidocaldarius as a reporter and affinity tag for expression and single step purification of polypeptides. Protein Expr. Purif. 54, 94–100 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Peschke, T. et al. Self-immobilizing fusion enzymes for compartmentalized biocatalysis. ACS Catal. 7, 7866–7872 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, W., Liu, M., You, C., Li, Z. & Zhang, Y.-H. P. ATP-free biosynthesis of a high-energy phosphate metabolite fructose 1,6-diphosphate by in vitro metabolic engineering. Metabol. Eng. 42, 168–174 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Schumperli, M., Pellaux, R. & Panke, S. Chemical and enzymatic routes to dihydroxyacetone phosphate. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 75, 33–45 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Britton, J., Majumdar, S. & Weiss, G. A. Continuous flow biocatalysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 5891–5918 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Contente, M. L. & Paradisi, F. Self-sustaining closed-loop multienzyme-mediated conversion of amines into alcohols in continuous reactions. Nat. Catal. 1, 452–459 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Jemli, S., Ayadi-Zouari, D., Hlima, H. B. & Bejar, S. Biocatalysts: application and engineering for industrial purposes. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 36, 246–258 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Modarres, H. P., Mofrad, M. R. & Sanati-Nezhad, A. Protein thermostability engineering. RSC Adv. 6, 115252–115270 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Babich, L., Hartog, A. F., van Hemert, L. J. C., Rutjes, F. P. J. T. & Wever, R. Synthesis of carbohydrates in a continuous flow reactor by immobilized phosphatase and aldolase. ChemSusChem 5, 2348–2353 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Nakamura, A., Minami, H., Urabe, I. & Okada, H. Properties of glucose-dehydrogenase-poly(ethylene glycol)-NAD conjugate as an NADH-regeneration unit in enzyme reactors. J. Ferment. Technol. 66, 267–272 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Schoevaart, R., van Rantwijk, F. & Sheldon, R. A. A four-step enzymatic cascade for the one-pot synthesis of non-natural carbohydrates from glycerol. J. Org. Chem. 65, 6940–6943 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Schoevaart, R., van Rantwijk, F. & Sheldon, R. A. Class I fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolases as catalysts for asymmetric aldol reactions. Tetrahedron 10, 705–711 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Babich, L. et al. Synthesis of non-natural carbohydrates from glycerol and aldehydes in a one-pot four-enzyme cascade reaction. Green. Chem. 13, 2895–2900 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Dall’Oglio, F. et al. Flow-based stereoselective reduction of ketones using an immobilized ketoreductase/glucose dehydrogenase mixed bed system. Catal. Comm. 93, 29–32 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the Science and Industry Endowment Fund for funding this work. We thank M. Wilding (Australian National University) and J. Oakeshott (CSIRO) for their constructive comments during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biotechnology and Synthetic Biology Group, CSIRO Land and Water, Black Mountain Science and Innovation Precinct, Canberra, Australia

    Carol J. Hartley, Nigel G. French, Andrew C. Warden & Colin Scott

  2. CSIRO Manufacturing, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

    Charlotte C. Williams, Judith A. Scoble, Quentin I. Churches, Andrea North, Tom Nebl & Greg Coia

  3. CSIRO Manufacturing, Clayton, Victoria, Australia

    Greg Simpson & Andrew R. Frazer

  4. School of Chemistry, Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

    Chantel Nixon Jensen & Nicholas J. Turner

Authors
  1. Carol J. Hartley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Charlotte C. Williams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Judith A. Scoble
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Quentin I. Churches
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Andrea North
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nigel G. French
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Tom Nebl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Greg Coia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Andrew C. Warden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Greg Simpson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Andrew R. Frazer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Chantel Nixon Jensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Nicholas J. Turner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Colin Scott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

C.C.W., G.S., N.J.T. and C.S. obtained the funding for this work. C.J.H., C.S., C.C.W., N.J.T., J.A.S. and G.C. conceived and designed the study. C.J.H., J.A.S., C.C.W., N.G.F., Q.I.C., A.N., A.R.F., T.N. and C.N.J. performed the experiments. C.J.H., C.C.W., J.A.S., A.R.F., A.N., T.N., Q.I.C. and C.N.J. analysed the data. A.C.W. performed the computational modelling analysis. C.J.H., C.C.W., A.N., J.A.S., N.G.F., T.N. and C.S. wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Colin Scott.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have submitted a PCT Patent Application (WO 2017_011870_A1) based on the research results reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Tables 1–2 and Supplementary Figs. 1–8

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hartley, C.J., Williams, C.C., Scoble, J.A. et al. Engineered enzymes that retain and regenerate their cofactors enable continuous-flow biocatalysis. Nat Catal 2, 1006–1015 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-019-0353-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-019-0353-0

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing