Abstract

Monitoring atomic and electronic structure changes on active sites under realistic working conditions is crucial for the rational design of efficient electrocatalysts. Identification of the active structure during the alkaline hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), which is critical to industrial water–alkali electrolysers, remains elusive and is a field of intense research. Here, by virtue of operando X-ray absorption spectroscopy on a uniform cobalt single-site catalyst, we report the atomic-level identification of the dynamic structure of catalytically active sites under alkaline HER. Our results reveal the formation of a high-valence HO–Co1–N2 moiety by the binding between isolated Co1–N4 sites with electrolyte hydroxide, and further unravel the preferred water adsorption reaction intermediate H2O–(HO–Co1–N2). Theoretical simulations rationalize this structural evolution and demonstrate that the highly oxidized Co sites are responsible for the catalytic performance. These findings suggest the electrochemical susceptibility of active sites, providing a coordination-engineered strategy for the advance of single-site catalysis.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Data availability

The data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Dresselhaus, M. & Thomas, I. Alternative energy technologies. Nature 414, 332–337 (2001).

  2. 2.

    Zou, X. & Zhang, Y. Noble metal-free hydrogen evolution catalysts for water splitting. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 5148–5180 (2015).

  3. 3.

    Walter, M. G. et al. Solar water splitting cells. Chem. Rev. 110, 6446–6473 (2010).

  4. 4.

    Subbaraman, R. et al. Trends in activity for the water electrolyser reactions on 3d M (Ni, Co, Fe, Mn) hydr(oxy)oxide catalysts. Nat. Mater. 11, 550–557 (2012).

  5. 5.

    Seh, Z. W. et al. Combining theory and experiment in electrocatalysis: Insights into materials design. Science 355, 146 (2017).

  6. 6.

    Subbaraman, R. et al. Enhancing hydrogen evolution activity in water splitting by tailoring Li+–Ni (OH)2–Pt interfaces. Science 334, 1256–1260 (2011).

  7. 7.

    Weng, Z. et al. Active sites of copper-complex catalytic materials for electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction. Nat. Commun. 9, 415 (2018).

  8. 8.

    Ding, K. et al. Identification of active sites in CO oxidation and water-gas shift over supported Pt catalysts. Science 350, 189–192 (2015).

  9. 9.

    Irvine, J. T. et al. Evolution of the electrochemical interface in high-temperature fuel cells and electrolysers. Nat. Energy 1, 15014 (2016).

  10. 10.

    Weng, Z. et al. Self-cleaning catalyst electrodes for stabilized CO2 reduction to hydrocarbons. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 13135–13139 (2017).

  11. 11.

    Malta, G. et al. Identification of single-site gold catalysis in acetylene hydrochlorination. Science 355, 1399–1403 (2017).

  12. 12.

    Qiao, B. et al. Single-atom catalysis of CO oxidation using Pt1/FeOx. Nat. Chem. 3, 634–641 (2011).

  13. 13.

    Liu, P. et al. Photochemical route for synthesizing atomically dispersed palladium catalysts. Science 352, 797–801 (2016).

  14. 14.

    Zhang, H., Liu, G., Shi, L. & Ye, J. Single-atom catalysts: emerging multifunctional materials in heterogeneous catalysis. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1701343 (2017).

  15. 15.

    Therrien, A. J. et al. An atomic-scale view of single-site Pt catalysis for low-temperature CO oxidation. Nat. Catal. 1, 192–198 (2018).

  16. 16.

    Jones, J. et al. Thermally stable single-atom platinum-on-ceria catalysts via atom trapping. Science 353, 150–154 (2016).

  17. 17.

    Li, H. et al. Synergetic interaction between neighbouring platinum monomers in CO2 hydrogenation. Nat. Nanotech. 13, 411–417 (2018).

  18. 18.

    Liu, W. et al. Single-site active cobalt-based photocatalyst with a long carrier lifetime for spontaneous overall water splitting. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 9312–9317 (2017).

  19. 19.

    Shan, J., Li, M., Allard, L. F., Lee, S. & Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M. Mild oxidation of methane to methanol or acetic acid on supported isolated rhodium catalysts. Nature 551, 605–608 (2017).

  20. 20.

    Nie, L. et al. Activation of surface lattice oxygen in single-atom Pt/CeO2 for low-temperature CO oxidation. Science 358, 1419–1423 (2017).

  21. 21.

    Tang, Y. et al. Single rhodium atoms anchored in micropores for efficient transformation of methane under mild conditions. Nat. Commun. 9, 1231 (2018).

  22. 22.

    Lin, L. et al. Low-temperature hydrogen production from water and methanol using Pt/α-MoC catalysts. Nature 544, 80–83 (2017).

  23. 23.

    Cheng, N. et al. Platinum single-atom and cluster catalysis of the hydrogen evolution reaction. Nat. Commun. 7, 13638 (2016).

  24. 24.

    Marković, N., Schmidt, T., Stamenković, V. & Ross, P. Oxygen reduction reaction on Pt and Pt bimetallic surfaces: a selective review. Fuel Cells 1, 105–116 (2001).

  25. 25.

    Jiao, Y., Zheng, Y., Jaroniec, M. & Qiao, S. Z. Design of electrocatalysts for oxygen-and hydrogen-involving energy conversion reactions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 2060–2086 (2015).

  26. 26.

    Liu, W. et al. Single-atom dispersed Co–N–C catalyst: structure identification and performance for hydrogenative coupling of nitroarenes. Chem. Sci. 7, 5758–5764 (2016).

  27. 27.

    Cao, Y. et al. Atomic insight into optimizing hydrogen evolution pathway over a Co1–N4 single-site photocatalyst. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 12191–12196 (2017).

  28. 28.

    Fei, H. et al. General synthesis and definitive structural identification of MN4C4 single-atom catalysts with tunable electrocatalytic activities. Nat. Catal. 1, 63–72 (2018).

  29. 29.

    Zitolo, A. et al. Identification of catalytic sites in cobalt–nitrogen–carbon materials for the oxygen reduction reaction. Nat. Commun. 8, 957 (2017).

  30. 30.

    Chen, W. et al. Rational design of single molybdenum atoms anchored on N-doped carbon for effective hydrogen evolution reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 129, 16302–16306 (2017).

  31. 31.

    Ledezma-Yanez, I. et al. Interfacial water reorganization as a pH-dependent descriptor of the hydrogen evolution rate on platinum electrodes. Nat. Energy 2, 17031 (2017).

  32. 32.

    Dou, J. et al. Operando chemistry of catalyst surfaces during catalysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 2001–2027 (2017).

  33. 33.

    Fabbri, E. et al. Dynamic surface self-reconstruction is the key of highly active perovskite nano-electrocatalysts for water splitting. Nat. Mater. 16, 925–931 (2017).

  34. 34.

    Yao, T. et al. Insights into initial kinetic nucleation of gold nanocrystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 7696–7701 (2010).

  35. 35.

    Tao, F. F. & Salmeron, M. In situ studies of chemistry and structure of materials in reactive environments. Science 331, 171–174 (2011).

  36. 36.

    Pastor, E. et al. Spectroelectrochemical analysis of the mechanism of (photo) electrochemical hydrogen evolution at a catalytic interface. Nat. Commun. 8, 14280 (2017).

  37. 37.

    Marberger, A. et al. Time-resolved copper speciation during selective catalytic reduction of NO on Cu-SSZ-13. Nat. Catal. 1, 221–227 (2018).

  38. 38.

    Genovese, C. et al. Operando spectroscopy study of the carbon dioxide electro-reduction by iron species on nitrogen-doped carbon. Nat. Commun. 9, 935 (2018).

  39. 39.

    Sun, Z. H., Liu, Q. H., Yao, T., Yan, W. S. & Wei, S. Q. X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy in nanomaterials. Sci. China Mater. 58, 313–341 (2015).

  40. 40.

    Jiao, Y., Zheng, Y., Davey, K. & Qiao, S.-Z. Activity origin and catalyst design principles for electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution on heteroatom-doped graphene. Nat. Energy 1, 16130 (2016).

  41. 41.

    Mahmood, J. et al. An efficient and pH-universal ruthenium-based catalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction. Nat. Nanotech. 12, 441–446 (2017).

  42. 42.

    Zhang, J. et al. Interface engineering of MoS2/Ni3S2 heterostructures for highly enhanced electrochemical overall-water-splitting activity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 128, 6814–6819 (2016).

  43. 43.

    Yin, P. et al. Single cobalt atoms with precise N-coordination as superior oxygen reduction reaction catalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 10800–10805 (2016).

  44. 44.

    Zandi, O. & Hamann, T. W. Determination of photoelectrochemical water oxidation intermediates on haematite electrode surfaces using operando infrared spectroscopy. Nat. Chem. 8, 778–783 (2016).

  45. 45.

    Xing, T. et al. Observation of active sites for oxygen reduction reaction on nitrogen-doped multilayer graphene. ACS Nano 8, 6856–6862 (2014).

  46. 46.

    Zheng, Y. et al. Molecule-level g-C3N4 coordinated transition metals as a new class of electrocatalysts for oxygen electrode reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 3336–3339 (2017).

  47. 47.

    Liang, Y. Y. et al. Co3O4 nanocrystals on graphene as a synergistic catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. Nat. Mater. 10, 780–786 (2011).

  48. 48.

    Istomin, S. Y. et al. An unusual high-spin ground state of Co3+ in octahedral coordination in brownmillerite-type cobalt oxide. Dalton Trans. 44, 10708–10713 (2015).

  49. 49.

    Zheng, X. et al. Theory-driven design of high-valence metal sites for water oxidation confirmed using in situ soft X-ray absorption. Nat. Chem. 10, 149–154 (2018).

  50. 50.

    Zheng, Y. et al. High electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution activity of an anomalous ruthenium catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 16174–16181 (2016).

  51. 51.

    Zhang, J. et al. Efficient hydrogen production on MoNi4 electrocatalysts with fast water dissociation kinetics. Nat. Commun. 8, 15437 (2017).

  52. 52.

    Newville, M. IFEFFIT: interactive XAFS analysis and FEFF fitting. J. Synchrot. Radiat. 8, 322–324 (2001).

  53. 53.

    Ravel, B. & Newville, M. ATHENA, ARTEMIS, HEPHAESTUS: data analysis for X-ray absorption spectroscopy using IFEFFIT. J. Synchrot. Radiat. 12, 537–541 (2005).

  54. 54.

    Ankudinov, A., Ravel, B., Rehr, J. & Conradson, S. Real-space multiple-scattering calculation and interpretation of X-ray-absorption near-edge structure. Phys. Rev. B 58, 7565–7576 (1998).

  55. 55.

    Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).

  56. 56.

    Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).

  57. 57.

    Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phy. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).

  58. 58.

    Monkhorst, H. J. & Pack, J. D. Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188–5192 (1976).

  59. 59.

    Henkelman, G., Uberuaga, B. P. & Jónsson, H. A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths. Phy. Rev. Lett 113, 9901 (2000).

  60. 60.

    Singh, U. P., Babbar, P., Tyagi, P. & Weyhermüller, T. A mononuclear cobalt(ii) hydroxo complex: synthesis, molecular structure, and reactivity studies. Transition Met. Chem. 33, 931–940 (2008).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the China Ministry of Science and Technology under contracts nos. 2017YFA0402800 and 2017YFA0208300, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants nos. 21471143, 21533007, 11621063 and 21703222), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (KY2310000020 and KY2310000019, and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS (CX2310000091). The authors thank NSRL, BSRF and SSRF for synchrotron beam time. Calculations were conducted on the supercomputing system in the Supercomputing Center of USTC.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Linlin Cao, Qiquan Luo, Wei Liu

Affiliations

  1. National Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China

    • Linlin Cao
    • , Wei Liu
    • , Xiaokang Liu
    • , Yuanjie Cao
    • , Wei Zhang
    • , Tao Yao
    •  & Shiqiang Wei
  2. Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China

    • Qiquan Luo
    • , Yue Lin
    •  & Jinlong Yang
  3. Department of Chemistry, Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemistry for Energy Materials, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China

    • Yuen Wu

Authors

  1. Search for Linlin Cao in:

  2. Search for Qiquan Luo in:

  3. Search for Wei Liu in:

  4. Search for Yue Lin in:

  5. Search for Xiaokang Liu in:

  6. Search for Yuanjie Cao in:

  7. Search for Wei Zhang in:

  8. Search for Yuen Wu in:

  9. Search for Jinlong Yang in:

  10. Search for Tao Yao in:

  11. Search for Shiqiang Wei in:

Contributions

T.Y. and S.W. developed the idea and designed experiments. L.C., X.L., Y.C., W.L. and W.Z. performed the catalyst synthesis and characterizations, XAFS measurements and electrochemical experiments. Q.L. and J.Y. conducted and discussed the theoretical calculations. L.C., Y.L. and Y.W. performed the aberration-corrected STEM characterization. L.C., T.Y. and S.W. co-wrote the paper. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Tao Yao or Shiqiang Wei.

Supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Figures 1–25, Supplementary Tables 1–2 and Supplementary References

  2. Supplementary Data 1

    Cartesian coordinates of the relaxed ex situ model

  3. Supplementary Data 2

    Cartesian coordinates of the relaxed open circuit model

  4. Supplementary Data 3

    Cartesian coordinates of the –0.04 V relaxed model

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

Issue Date

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-018-0203-5