Article | Published:

A universal principle for a rational design of single-atom electrocatalysts

Nature Catalysisvolume 1pages339348 (2018) | Download Citation

  • A Correction to this article was published on 20 July 2018


Developing highly active single-atom catalysts for electrochemical reactions is a key to future renewable energy technology. Here we present a universal design principle to evaluate the activity of graphene-based single-atom catalysts towards the oxygen reduction, oxygen evolution and hydrogen evolution reactions. Our results indicate that the catalytic activity of single-atom catalysts is highly correlated with the local environment of the metal centre, namely its coordination number and electronegativity and the electronegativity of the nearest neighbour atoms, validated by available experimental data. More importantly, we reveal that this design principle can be extended to metal–macrocycle complexes. The principle not only offers a strategy to design highly active nonprecious metal single-atom catalysts with specific active centres, for example, Fe-pyridine/pyrrole-N4 for the oxygen reduction reaction; Co-pyrrole-N4 for the oxygen evolution reaction; and Mn-pyrrole-N4 for the hydrogen evolution reaction to replace precious Pt/Ir/Ru-based catalysts, but also suggests that macrocyclic metal complexes could be used as an alternative to graphene-based single-atom catalysts.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Change history

  • 20 July 2018

    The original Supplementary Information file published with this Article was an older version; it was missing several Tables, and the Methods section was a duplicate of that from the main article. A new Supplementary Information file has been uploaded with these issues corrected.


  1. 1.

    Luo, J. et al. Water photolysis at 12.3% efficiency via perovskite photovoltaics and Earth-abundant catalysts. Science 345, 1593–1596 (2014).

  2. 2.

    Chen, C. et al. Highly crystalline multimetallic nanoframes with three-dimensional electrocatalytic surfaces. Science 343, 1339–1343 (2014).

  3. 3.

    Wang, Y. J. et al. Carbon-supported Pt-based alloy electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells: particle size, shape, and composition manipulation and their impact to activity. Chem. Rev. 115, 3433–3467 (2015).

  4. 4.

    Holewinski, A., Idrobo, J. C. & Linic, S. High-performance Ag–Co alloy catalysts for electrochemical oxygen reduction. Nat. Chem. 6, 828–834 (2014).

  5. 5.

    Bai, X. et al. Theoretical investigation on the reaction pathways for oxygen reduction reaction on silicon doped graphene as potential metal-free catalyst. J. Electrochem. Soc. 163, F1496–F1502 (2016).

  6. 6.

    Greeley, J. et al. Alloys of platinum and early transition metals as oxygen reduction electrocatalysts. Nat. Chem. 1, 552–556 (2009).

  7. 7.

    Yang, X.-F. et al. Single-atom catalysts: a new frontier in heterogeneous catalysis. Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 1740–1748 (2013).

  8. 8.

    Qiao, B. et al. Single-atom catalysis of CO oxidation using Pt1/FeOx. Nat. Chem. 3, 634–641 (2011).

  9. 9.

    Wu, G., More, K. L., Johnston, C. M. & Zelenay, P. High-performance electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction derived from polyaniline, iron, and cobalt. Science 332, 443–447 (2011).

  10. 10.

    Lefèvre, M., Proietti, E., Jaouen, F. & Dodelet, J. P. Iron-based catalysts with improved oxygen reduction activity in polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Science 324, 71–74 (2009).

  11. 11.

    Fei, H. et al. Atomic cobalt on nitrogen-doped graphene for hydrogen generation. Nat. Commun. 6, 8668 (2015).

  12. 12.

    Fan, L. et al. Atomically isolated nickel species anchored on graphitized carbon for efficient hydrogen evolution electrocatalysis. Nat. Commun. 7, 10667 (2016).

  13. 13.

    Chen, Y. et al. Isolated single iron atoms anchored on N-doped porous carbon as an efficient electrocatalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 6937–6941 (2017).

  14. 14.

    Zhang, X. et al. Catalytically active single-atom niobium in graphitic layers. Nat. Commun. 4, 1924 (2013).

  15. 15.

    Chen, W. et al. Rational design of single molybdenum atoms anchored on N-doped carbon for effective hydrogen evolution reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 16086–16090 (2017).

  16. 16.

    Chen, X., Chen, S. & Wang, J. Screening of catalytic oxygen reduction reaction activity of metal-doped graphene by density functional theory. Appl. Surf. Sci. 379, 291–295 (2016).

  17. 17.

    Li, X., Zhong, W., Peng, C., Li, J. & Jiang, J. Design of efficient catalysts with double transition metal atoms on C2N layer. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7, 1750–1755 (2016).

  18. 18.

    Zagal, J. H., Griveau, S., Silva, J. F., Nyokong, T. & Bedioui, F. Metallophthalocyanine-based molecular materials as catalysts for electrochemical reactions. Coord. Chem. Rev. 254, 2755–2791 (2010).

  19. 19.

    Costentin, C. & Savéant, J.-M. Towards an intelligent design of molecular electrocatalysts. Nat. Rev. Chem. 1, 0087 (2017).

  20. 20.

    Zitolo, A. et al. Identification of catalytic sites for oxygen reduction in iron- and nitrogen-doped graphene materials. Nat. Mater. 14, 937–942 (2015).

  21. 21.

    Liu, W. et al. Single-atom dispersed Co-N-C catalyst: structure identification and performance for hydrogenative coupling of nitroarenes. Chem. Sci. 7, 5758–5764 (2016).

  22. 22.

    Kramm, U. I. et al. On an easy way to prepare metal–nitrogen doped carbon with exclusive presence of MeN4-type sites active for the ORR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 635–640 (2015).

  23. 23.

    Sahraie, N. R. et al. Quantifying the density and utilization of active sites in non-precious metal oxygen electroreduction catalysts. Nat. Commun. 6, 8618–8626 (2015).

  24. 24.

    Greeley, J., Jaramillo, T. F., Bonde, J., Chorkendorff, I. B. & Nørskov, J. K. Computational high-throughput screening of electrocatalytic materials for hydrogen evolution. Nat. Mater. 5, 909–913 (2006).

  25. 25.

    Stamenkovic, V. R. et al. Trends in electrocatalysis on extended and nanoscale Pt-bimetallic alloy surfaces. Nat. Mater. 6, 241–247 (2007).

  26. 26.

    Jiao, Y., Zheng, Y., Jaroniec, M. & Qiao, S. Z. Origin of the electrocatalytic oxygen reduction activity of graphene-based catalysts: a roadmap to achieve the best performance. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 4394–4403 (2014).

  27. 27.

    Suntivich, J., Gasteiger, H., Yabuuchi, N., Goodenough, J. B. & Shao-Horn, Y. Design principles for oxygen reduction activity on perovskite oxides in alkaline environment. Nat. Chem. 3, 546–550 (2011).

  28. 28.

    Tao, H. B. et al. Identification of surface reactivity descriptor for transition metal oxides in oxygen evolution reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 9978–9985 (2016).

  29. 29.

    Calle-Vallejo, F., Loffreda, D., Koper, M. T. M. & Sautet, P. Introducing structural sensitivity into adsorption-energy scaling relations by means of coordination numbers. Nat. Chem. 7, 403–410 (2015).

  30. 30.

    Chung, H. T. et al. Direct atomic-level insight into the active sites of a high-performance PGM-free ORR catalyst. Science 357, 479–484 (2017).

  31. 31.

    Liu, J. et al. High-performance oxygen reduction electrocatalysts based on cheap carbon black, nitrogen, and trace iron. Adv. Mater. 25, 6879–6883 (2013).

  32. 32.

    Liu, J. et al. High performance platinum single atom electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. Nat. Commun. 8, 15938 (2017).

  33. 33.

    Man, I. C. et al. Universality in oxygen evolution electrocatalysis on oxide surfaces. ChemCatChem 3, 1159–1165 (2011).

  34. 34.

    Koper, M. T. M. Thermodynamic theory of multi-electron transfer reactions: implications for electrocatalysis. J. Electroanal. Chem. 660, 254–260 (2011).

  35. 35.

    Rossmeisl, J., Qu, Z. W., Zhu, H., Kroes, G. J. & Nørskov, J. K. Electrolysis of water on oxide surfaces. J. Electroanal. Chem. 607, 83–89 (2007).

  36. 36.

    Kaukonen, M., Krasheninnikov, A. V., Kauppinen, E. & Nieminen, R. M. Doped graphene as a material for oxygen reduction reaction in hydrogen fuel cells: a computational study. ACS Catal. 3, 159–165 (2013).

  37. 37.

    Nørskov, J. K. et al. Trends in the exchange current for hydrogen evolution. J. Electrochem. Soc. 152, J23–J26 (2005).

  38. 38.

    Hong, W. T. et al. Toward the rational design of non-precious transition metal oxides for oxygen electrocatalysis. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 1404–1427 (2015).

  39. 39.

    Bligaard, T. & Nørskov, J. K. Chemical Bonding at Surfaces and Interfaces 257–278 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2008).

  40. 40.

    Yin, P. et al. Single cobalt atoms with precise N-coordination as superior oxygen reduction reaction catalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 10800–10805 (2016).

  41. 41.

    Wang, Z.-L. et al. C and N hybrid coordination derived Co–C–N complex as a highly efficient electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 15070–15073 (2015).

  42. 42.

    Zheng, Y., Jiao, Y., Jaroniec, M. & Qiao, S. Z. Advancing the electrochemistry of the hydrogen-evolution reaction through combining experiment and theory. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 52–65 (2015).

  43. 43.

    Jiang, S., Zhu, C. & Dong, S. Cobalt and nitrogen-cofunctionalized graphene as a durable non-precious metal catalyst with enhanced ORR activity. J. Mater. Chem. A 1, 3593–3599 (2013).

  44. 44.

    Liu, X., Amiinu, I. S., Liu, S., Cheng, K. & Mu, S. Transition metal/nitrogen dual-doped mesoporous graphene-like carbon nanosheets for the oxygen reduction and evolution reactions. Nanoscale 8, 13311–13320 (2016).

  45. 45.

    Hou, Y. et al. An advanced nitrogen-doped graphene/cobalt-embedded porous carbon polyhedron hybrid for efficient catalysis of oxygen reduction and water splitting. Adv. Funct. Mater. 25, 872–882 (2015).

  46. 46.

    Morozan, A., Goellner, V., Nedellec, Y., Hannauer, J. & Jaouen, F. Effect of the transition metal on metal–nitrogen–carbon catalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction. J. Electrochem. Soc. 162, H719–H726 (2015).

  47. 47.

    Baran, J. D., Grönbeck, H. & Hellman, A. Analysis of porphyrines as catalysts for electrochemical reduction of O2 and oxidation of H2O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 1320–1326 (2014).

  48. 48.

    Cheon, J. Y. et al. Intrinsic relationship between enhanced oxygen reduction reaction activity and nanoscale work function of doped carbons. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 8875–8878 (2014).

  49. 49.

    Abel, M., Clair, S., Ourdjini, O., Mossoyan, M. & Porte, L. Single layer of polymeric Fe-phthalocyanine: an organometallic sheet on metal and thin insulating film. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 1203–1205 (2011).

  50. 50.

    Stepanow, S. et al. Spin tuning of electron-doped metal–phthalocyanine layers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 5451–5459 (2014).

  51. 51.

    Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).

  52. 52.

    Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).

  53. 53.

    Perdew, J., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).

  54. 54.

    Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).

  55. 55.

    Dudarev, S. L., Botton, G. A., Savrasov, S. Y., Humphreys, C. J. & Sutton, A. P. Electron-energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: an LSDA + U study. Phys. Rev. B 57, 1505–1509 (1998).

  56. 56.

    Mathew, K., Sundararaman, R., Letchworthweaver, K., Arias, T. A. & Hennig, R. G. Implicit solvation model for density-functional study of nanocrystal surfaces and reaction pathways. J. Chem. Phys. 140, 084106 (2014).

  57. 57.

    Calle-Vallejo, F., Martínez, J. I., García-Lastra, J. M., Abad, E. & Koper, M. T. M. Oxygen reduction and evolution at single-metal active sites: Comparison between functionalized graphitic materials and protoporphyrins. Surf. Sci. 607, 47–53 (2013).

  58. 58.

    Nørskov, J. et al. Origin of the overpotential for oxygen reduction at a fuel-cell cathode. J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 17886–17892 (2004).

  59. 59.

    Desai, S. K. & Neurock, M. First-principles study of the role of solvent in the dissociation of water over a Pt-Ru alloy. Phys. Rev. B 68, 1071–1086 (2003).

  60. 60.

    Rossmeisl, J., Logadottir, A. & Nørskov, J. K. Electrolysis of water on (oxidized) metal surfaces. Chem. Phys. 319, 178–184 (2005).

  61. 61.

    De Paula, J. Atkins’ Physical Chemistry (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010).

Download references


This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (91634116, 21576008, 21625601).

Author information


  1. Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Soft Matter Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing, China

    • Haoxiang Xu
    • , Daojian Cheng
    • , Dapeng Cao
    •  & Xiao Cheng Zeng
  2. State Key Laboratory of Organic-Inorganic Composites, Beijing Key Laboratory of Energy Environmental Catalysis, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing, China

    • Daojian Cheng
    •  & Dapeng Cao
  3. Department of Chemistry, Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, and Department of Mechanical & Materials Engineering, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, USA

    • Xiao Cheng Zeng


  1. Search for Haoxiang Xu in:

  2. Search for Daojian Cheng in:

  3. Search for Dapeng Cao in:

  4. Search for Xiao Cheng Zeng in:


D.J.C. and X.C.Z. conceived the original idea and designed the DFT calculations. D.J.C. and H.X. contributed to the density functional theory calculations. D.P.C. analysed the results. All authors wrote the manuscript and have reviewed, discussed and approved the results and conclusions of this article.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Daojian Cheng or Dapeng Cao or Xiao Cheng Zeng.

Supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Figures 1–28, Supplementary Tables 1–54, Supplementary References

About this article

Publication history





Further reading