Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The gap between academia and industry in resistive switching research

While academic research into resistive switching materials continues to grow, Intel recently shut down its resistive switching memory manufacturing plant. What does this mean for the future of nanoelectronic technologies based on resistive switching devices?

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The memory hierarchy and the role of resistive switching memories.
Fig. 2: Test structures commonly used in academia and industry.

References

  1. Pearson, A. D., Northover, W., Dewald, J. F. & Peck, W. Jr Adv. Glass Technol. 2, 357–365 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yole Intelligence Emerging Non-volatile Memory 2022 (Yole Group, 2022); https://go.nature.com/42LRkBS

  3. Lanza, M. et al. Science 376, eabj9979 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Non-volatile memory with very small operating current: ReRAM (accessed 7 September 2022); https://go.nature.com/3FXDO4h

  5. Intel Reports Second-quarter 2022 Financial Results (Intel, 28 July 2022); https://go.nature.com/3FUzkeY

  6. Micron Updates Data Center Portfolio Strategy to Address Growing Opportunity for Memory and Storage Hierarchy Innovation (Micron, 16 March 2021); https://go.nature.com/3JNA5ro

  7. Molas, G. & Nowak, E. Appl. Sci. 11, 11254 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ueki, M. et al. Low-power embedded ReRAM technology for IoT applications. In IEEE Symp. VLSI Technol. T108–T109 (IEEE, 2015).

  9. Molas, G. et al. High temperature stability embedded ReRAM for 2x nm node and beyond. In IEEE Int. Memory Workshop 1–4 (IEEE, 2022).

  10. Marinella, M. J. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 68, 546–572 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kalavade, P. 4 bits/cell 96 layer floating gate 3D NAND with CMOS under array technology and SSDs. In IEEE Int. Memory Workshop 1–4 (IEEE, 2020).

  12. Inaba, S. 3D flash memory for data-intensive applications. In IEEE Int. Memory Workshop 1–4 (IEEE, 2018).

  13. Nishi, Y. & Magyari-Kope, B. Advances in Non-volatile Memory and Storage Technology (Woodhead Publishing, 2019).

  14. Strenz, R. Review and outlook on embedded NVM technologies—from evolution to revolution. In IEEE Int. Memory Workshop 1–4 (IEEE, 2020).

  15. Peters, C., Adler, F., Hofmann, K. & Otterstedt, J. Reliability of 28nm embedded RRAM for consumer and industrial products. In IEEE Int. Memory Workshop 1–3 (IEEE, 2022).

  16. Nakayama, M. ReRAM technologies: applications and outlook. IEEE Int. Memory Workshop 1–4 (IEEE, 2017).

  17. Grenouillet, L. et al. 16 kbit 1T1R OxRAM arrays embedded in 28 nm FDSOI technology demonstrating low BER, high endurance, and compatibility with core logic transistors. In IEEE Int. Memory Workshop 1–4 (IEEE, 2021).

  18. Zuo, Y. et al. Adv. Electron. Mater. 6, 1901226 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen, A. Forming voltage scaling of resistive switching memories. In IEEE 71st Device Res. Conf. 181–182 (IEEE, 2013).

  20. Chand, U. et al. Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, 153502 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lanza, M. et al. ACS Nano 15, 17214–17231 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ma, Z. et al. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14, 21207–21216 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang, H. Challenges in automotive memory solutions. In IEEE Int. Memory Workshop 1–7 (IEEE, 2018).

  24. Europractice IC Services Schedules and Prices 2023 (2023); https://go.nature.com/3L6mKfE

  25. Zhu, K. et al. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05973-1 (2023).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank S. Bertolazzi from Yole Development and S. Pazos from the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology for useful discussions, as well as W. Lu from the University of Michigan for providing an early version of Fig. 1b.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Lanza.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

G.M. and I.N. are employees of Weebit Nano, which is looking to commercialize resistive switching devices based on metal oxides.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lanza, M., Molas, G. & Naveh, I. The gap between academia and industry in resistive switching research. Nat Electron 6, 260–263 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-023-00954-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-023-00954-8

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing