Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Electric field mapping of wide-bandgap semiconductor devices at a submicrometre resolution

Nature Electronics volume 4, pages 478–485 (2021)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Electric fields drive the degradation of wide-bandgap semiconductor devices. However, directly mapping the electric field inside an active device region remains challenging. Here we show that electric-field-induced second harmonic generation can be used to map the electric field in the device channel of GaN-based high-electron-mobility transistors at submicrometre resolution. To illustrate the capabilities of the approach, we use it to examine the impact of carbon impurities in the epitaxial buffer layer of a device. Carbon is a p dopant in GaN, and small changes in its concentration can dramatically change the bulk Fermi level, sometimes resulting in a floating buffer that is ‘short-circuited’ to the device channel via dislocations. Our measurements show that very different electric field distributions can occur in devices with different carbon concentrations, despite them having similar device terminal characteristics. We also show that dislocation-related leakage paths can lead to inhomogeneity in the electric field.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Schematic of the EFISHG experiment on GaN HEMTs and device information.
Fig. 2: Electric field distribution in GaN HEMT devices.
Fig. 3: Simulation results for devices on wafer A and B.
Fig. 4: Simulated channel in-plane electric field Ex averaged over the lateral spatial resolution of the EFISHG measurement.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

The custom-developed codes for the SILVACO Atlas simulation, LabView data acquisition and MATLAB data analysis are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Uren, M. J., Moreke, J. & Kuball, M. Buffer design to minimize current collapse in GaN/AlGaN HFETs. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 59, 3327–3333 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Würfl, J. et al. Techniques towards GaN power transistors with improved high voltage dynamic switching properties. In IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting 6.1.1–6.1. 4 (IEEE, 2013).

  3. Zhang, N.-Q. et al. High breakdown GaN HEMT with overlapping gate structure. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 21, 421–423 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rajasingam, S. et al. Micro-Raman temperature measurements for electric field assessment in active AlGaN–GaN HFETs. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 25, 456–458 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Faqir, M., Verzellesi, G., Meneghesso, G., Zanoni, E. & Fantini, F. Investigation of high-electric-field degradation effects in AlGaN/GaN HEMTs. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 55, 1592–1602 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Meneghini, M. et al. Buffer traps in Fe-doped AlGaN/GaN HEMTs: investigation of the physical properties based on pulsed and transient measurements. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 61, 4070–4077 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pomeroy, J. W., Uren, M. J., Lambert, B. & Kuball, M. Operating channel temperature in GaN HEMTs: DC versus RF accelerated life testing. Microelectron. Reliab. 55, 2505–2510 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuzmík, J. et al. Transient thermal characterization of AlGaN/GaN HEMTs grown on silicon. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 52, 1698–1705 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Öner, B., Pomeroy, J. W. & Kuball, M. Time resolved hyperspectral quantum rod thermography of microelectronic devices: temperature transients in a GaN HEMT. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 41, 812–815 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Möreke, J. et al. Liquid crystal electrography: electric field mapping and detection of peak electric field strength in AlGaN/GaN high electron mobility transistors. Microelectron. Reliab. 54, 921–925 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nakagami, K., Ohno, Y., Kishimoto, S., Maezawa, K. & Mizutani, T. Surface potential measurements of AlGaN/GaN high-electron-mobility transistors by Kelvin probe force microscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 6028–6029 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Turkulets, Y. & Shalish, I. Franz–Keldysh effect in semiconductor built-in fields: doping concentration and space charge region characterization. J. Appl. Phys. 124, 075102 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Turkulets, Y. & Shalish, I. Contactless method to measure 2DEG charge density and band structure in HEMT structures. IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc. 6, 703–707 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Manaka, T., Lim, E., Tamura, R., Yamada, D. & Iwamoto, M. Probing of the electric field distribution in organic field effect transistor channel by microscopic second-harmonic generation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 072113 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Morris, J. et al. Mapping electric field distributions in biased organic bulk heterojunctions under illumination by nonlinear optical microscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 033301 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lüpke, G. Characterization of semiconductor interfaces by second-harmonic generation. Surf. Sci. Rep. 35, 75–161 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Manaka, T. & Iwamoto, M. Optical second-harmonic generation measurement for probing organic device operation. Light. Sci. Appl. 5, e16040 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Manaka, T., Lim, E., Tamura, R. & Iwamoto, M. Direct imaging of carrier motion in organic transistors by optical second-harmonic generation. Nat. Photon. 1, 581–584 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ohlhoff, C., Lüpke, G., Meyer, C. & Kurz, H. Static and high-frequency electric fields in silicon MOS and MS structures probed by optical second-harmonic generation. Phys. Rev. B 55, 4596 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Aktsipetrov, O. et al. dc-electric-field-induced second-harmonic generation in Si(111)–SiO2–Cr metal–oxide–semiconductor structures. Phys. Rev. B 54, 1825–1832 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Katsuno, T. et al. Three-dimensional current collapse imaging of AlGaN/GaN high electron mobility transistors by electric field-induced optical second-harmonic generation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 192102 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Katsuno, T. et al. Current collapse imaging of Schottky gate AlGaN/GaN high electron mobility transistors by electric field-induced optical second-harmonic generation measurement. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 252112 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Katsuno, T. et al. Degradation analysis and current collapse imaging of AlGaN/GaN HEMTs by measurement of electric field-induced optical second-harmonic generation. Microelectron. Reliab. 54, 2227–2231 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Katsuno, T., Manaka, T., Soejima, N., Ishikawa, T. & Iwamoto, M. Degradation analysis of AlGaN/GaN high electron mobility transistor by electroluminescence, electric field-induced optical second-harmonic generation, and photoluminescence imaging. Appl. Phys. Lett. 113, 012106 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Katsuno, T., Manaka, T., Soejima, N. & Iwamoto, M. Direct observation of trapped charges under field-plate in p-GaN gate AlGaN/GaN high electron mobility transistors by electric field-induced optical second-harmonic generation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 110, 092101 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Boyd, R. W. Nonlinear Optics (Academic Press, 2019).

  27. Chen, P. et al. Interaction between the intrinsic second-and third-order optical fields in an Al0.53Ga0.47N/GaN heterostructure. Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 161112 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jiang, W., Wu, Y., Lin, W., Li, S. & Kang, J. Electro-optic coefficient enhancement of AlxGa1 − xN via multiple field modulations. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 17707–17712 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Almeida, G. F. et al. Third-order nonlinear spectrum of GaN under femtosecond-pulse excitation from the visible to the near infrared. Photonics 2019, 69 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. De Leonardis, F., Soref, R. A. & Passaro, V. M. Dispersion of nonresonant third-order nonlinearities in silicon carbide. Sci. Rep. 7, 40924 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tien, M.-C., Bauters, J. F., Heck, M. J., Blumenthal, D. J. & Bowers, J. E. Ultra-low loss Si3N4 waveguides with low nonlinearity and high power handling capability. Opt. Express 18, 23562–23568 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hirshy, H. et al. Evaluation of pulsed I–V analysis as validation tool of nonlinear RF models of GaN-based HFETs. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 65, 5307–5313 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Singh, M. et al. ‘Kink’ in AlGaN/GaN-HEMTs: floating buffer model. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 65, 3746–3753 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Uren, M. et al. Punch-through in short-channel AlGaN/GaN HFETs. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 53, 395–398 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lyons, J., Janotti, A. & Van de Walle, C. Effects of carbon on the electrical and optical properties of InN, GaN and AlN. Phys. Rev. B 89, 035204 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Polyakov, A. Y. & Lee, I.-H. Deep traps in GaN-based structures as affecting the performance of GaN devices. Mater. Sci. Eng. R 94, 1–56 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Uren, M. J. et al. Electric field reduction in C-doped AlGaN/GaN on Si high electron mobility transistors. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 36, 826–828 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. SILVACO Atlas (Silvaco, 2016); www.silvaco.com

  39. Pooth, A. et al. Morphological and electrical comparison of Ti and Ta based ohmic contacts for AlGaN/GaN-on-SiC HFETs. Microelectron. Reliab. 68, 2–4 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Rackauskas, B. et al. The impact of Ti/Al contacts on AlGaN/GaN HEMT vertical leakage and breakdown. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 39, 1580–1583 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Uren, M. J. et al. Intentionally carbon-doped AlGaN/GaN HEMTs: necessity for vertical leakage paths. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 35, 327–329 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Miragliotta, J. & Wickenden, D. Nonlinear electroreflectance from gallium nitride using optical second-harmonic generation. Phys. Rev. B 53, 1388 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Uren, M. J. et al. ‘Leaky dielectric’ model for the suppression of dynamic RON in carbon-doped AlGaN/GaN HEMTs. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 64, 2826–2834 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Rackauskas, B. et al. Determination of the self-compensation ratio of carbon in AlGaN for HEMTs. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 65, 1838–1842 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Rackauskas, B., Dalcanale, S., Uren, M., Kachi, T. & Kuball, M. Leakage mechanisms in GaN-on-GaN vertical pn diodes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 233501 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Uren, M. J., Cäsar, M., Gajda, M. A. & Kuball, M. Buffer transport mechanisms in intentionally carbon doped GaN heterojunction field effect transistors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 263505 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Kang, H., Jia, B. & Gu, M. Polarization characterization in the focal volume of high numerical aperture objectives. Opt. Express 18, 10813–10821 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Cai, W., Vasudev, A. P. & Brongersma, M. L. Electrically controlled nonlinear generation of light with plasmonics. Science 333, 1720–1723 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge financial contribution from the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) under grant EP/R022739/1. Y.C. acknowledges the China Scholarship Council for financial support under grant 201806290005. The GaN HEMTs were provided by T. Martin, IQE Europe, and their fabrication at BeMiTec was funded by the European Space Agency.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Device Thermography and Reliability, H.H. Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

    Yuke Cao, James W. Pomeroy, Michael J. Uren, Feiyuan Yang & Martin Kuball

Authors
  1. Yuke Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James W. Pomeroy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael J. Uren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Feiyuan Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Martin Kuball
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.W.P. and M.K. conceived the idea for the project. Y.C. designed the EFISHG set-up and experimental procedure, conducted the experiments and analysed the results. J.W.P. provided important expertise on the technique. F.Y. conducted the simulation. M.J.U. provided significant input on the interpretation of data. All authors participated in the scientific discussion. Y.C. wrote the manuscript with the assistance of J.W.P., M.J.U. and M.K. M.K. supervised the project.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Kuball.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Electronics thanks Ilan Shalish and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Schematic of optical setup for the EFISHG measurement.

Abbreviations for optical components: OC – optical chopper; HWP – half waveplate; LP – linear polarizer; SD – short-pass dichroic mirror; BS – beam splitter; SF – short-pass filter; APD – avalanche photodetector.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Lateral spatial resolution of the setup.

a, Fundamental laser intensity reflected from the sample around a knife edge to determine spatial resolution of the optical system used (50× magnification 0.5NA objective lens). b, line spread function, that is differential of the intensity shown in a, gives the lateral resolution. The measured lateral resolution is (765±35) nm.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3 Buffer doping and band diagram of two wafers.

a, SIMS iron (Fe) and carbon (C) profile of wafers A and B; overlaid are simplified doping density profiles subsequently used for the device simulation33 (Supplementary Table 1). Carbon is assumed to be primarily situated on the nitrogen site (CN). b, Unbiased band profile from the device surface into the epilayer on wafer A and wafer B.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4 EFISHG measurement in GaN HEMT devices.

a, b, SHG signal (top panel) and reflectance (bottom panel) from source to drain contact of the GaN-on-SiC HEMT in the OFF state (VGS=−6V) under different gate-drain bias voltages VDG for wafer A and wafer B, respectively.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 5 Quantitative calibration of the electric field Ex extracted from EFISHG measurement.

a, b, Potential difference between source and drain contact, obtained by integrating the electric field Ex, determined from the SHG signal in Extended Data Fig. 4 for wafer A and wafer B, respectively. Insert shows the potential profiles from the source contact edge located at x = 0 µm towards the drain contact edge located at x = 5.5 µm. The proportionality factor α in equation (2) was adjusted to 2.1 for wafer A so that the potential matches the applied VDG, and to 3.4 for wafer B, to match the applied VDG up to 111V.

Source data

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–7, Table 1 and Notes 1–3.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 2

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 3

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 4

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 2

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 3

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 4

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 5

Statistical source data.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cao, Y., Pomeroy, J.W., Uren, M.J. et al. Electric field mapping of wide-bandgap semiconductor devices at a submicrometre resolution. Nat Electron 4, 478–485 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-021-00599-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-021-00599-5

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing