Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

WEARABLE TECHNOLOGY

Do deaf communities actually want sign language gloves?

Nature Electronics volume 3, pages 512–513 (2020)Cite this article

Subjects

The development of recognition and translation technology for signed language requires an interdisciplinary approach that begins with deaf contributors.

Automatic speech recognition is useful but unremarkable given how widespread the technology is in households, schools, workplaces, vehicles, and public spaces. Naturally, this leads to a desire to extend such technology to automatic sign recognition to capture and translate physically produced expressions of signed languages into speech. Such translation could be a great aid to cross-language communication between a signer and a speaker in which the signer can sign a few phrases that are then translated into equivalent expressions in spoken language for the speaker, and vice versa. Such a goal was established in 1983 with the first work on sign language electronic gloves1,2. But the goal is still out of reach for three key reasons: the lack of an appropriate linguistic framework, the lack of appropriate applications of wearable automatic sign recognition technologies, and the lack of interdisciplinary collaboration.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

Buy

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Sign language glove technology.

References

  1. Bragg, D. et al. In Proc. 21st Int. ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility 16–31 (2019).

  2. Erard, M. Why sign-language gloves don’t help deaf people. The Atlantic (9 November 2017).

  3. Fenlon, J. & Wilkinson, E. Sign languages in the world. In Sociolinguistics and Deaf Communities (eds. Lucas, C. & Schembri, A. C.) 5–28 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2015).

  4. Zhou, Z. et al. Nat. Electron. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-020-0428-6 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, United States

    Joseph Hill

Authors
  1. Joseph Hill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Hill.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hill, J. Do deaf communities actually want sign language gloves?. Nat Electron 3, 512–513 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-020-0451-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-020-0451-7

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing