Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Sweat-activated biocompatible batteries for epidermal electronic and microfluidic systems

Abstract

Recent advances in materials, mechanics and design have led to the development of ultrathin, lightweight electronic devices that can conformally interface with human skin. With few exceptions, these devices rely on electrical power to support sensing, wireless communication and signal conditioning. Unfortunately, most sources of such power consist of batteries constructed using hazardous materials, often with form factors that frustrate incorporation into skin-like, or epidermal, electronic devices. Here we report a biocompatible, sweat-activated battery technology that can be embedded within a soft, microfluidic platform. The battery can be used in a detachable electronic module that contains wireless communication and power management systems, and is capable of continuous on-skin recording of physiological signals. To illustrate the practical utility of our approach, we show using human trials that the sweat-activated batteries can operate hybrid microfluidic/microelectronic systems that simultaneously monitor heart rate, sweat chloride and sweat pH.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Working principles and characteristics of an SAC.
Fig. 2: Discharge properties and EIS studies of SAC.
Fig. 3: Power management circuit and its characteristics.
Fig. 4: SAC-powered, skin-interfaced hybrid microfluidic–microelectronic system.

Data availability

The data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Code availability

Custom-developed firmware for the electronic module and LabView data acquisition software for hardware characterization are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Ray, T. R. et al. Bio-integrated wearable systems: a comprehensive review. Chem. Rev. 119, 5461–5533 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Song, Y., Min, J. & Gao, W. Wearable and implantable electronics: moving toward precision therapy. ACS Nano 13, 12280–12286 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bariya, M., Nyein, H. Y. Y. & Javey, A. Wearable sweat sensors. Nat. Electron. 1, 160 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Choi, J. et al. Soft, skin-integrated multifunctional microfluidic systems for accurate colorimetric analysis of sweat biomarkers and temperature. ACS Sens. 4, 379–388 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Caldara, M., Colleoni, C., Guido, E., Re, V. & Rosace, G. Optical monitoring of sweat pH by a textile fabric wearable sensor based on covalently bonded litmus-3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane coating. Sens. Actuators B 222, 213–220 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Reeder, J. T. et al. Resettable skin interfaced microfluidic sweat collection devices with chemesthetic hydration feedback. Nat. Commun. 10, 5513 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Yang, Y. et al. A laser-engraved wearable sensor for sensitive detection of uric acid and tyrosine in sweat. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 217–224 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kim, J. et al. Simultaneous monitoring of sweat and interstitial fluid using a single wearable biosensor platform. Adv. Sci. 5, 1800880 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Khan, Y. et al. Organic multi-channel optoelectronic sensors for wearable health monitoring. IEEE Access 7, 128114–128124 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kafi, M. A., Paul, A., Vilouras, A., Hosseini, E. S. & Dahiya, R. S. Chitosan-graphene oxide based ultra-thin and flexible sensor for diabetic wound monitoring. IEEE Sens. J. 13, 6794–6801 (2019).

  11. 11.

    Lee, K. et al. Mechano-acoustic sensing of physiological processes and body motions via a soft wireless device placed at the suprasternal notch. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 4, 148–158 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Imani, S. et al. A wearable chemical–electrophysiological hybrid biosensing system for real-time health and fitness monitoring. Nat. Commun. 7, 11650 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Yin, L. et al. Highly stable battery pack via insulated, reinforced, buckling-enabled interconnect array. Small 14, 1800938 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Liu, R. et al. Shape memory polymers for body motion energy harvesting and self‐powered mechanosensing. Adv. Mater. 30, 1705195 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Mokhtari, F., Foroughi, J., Zheng, T., Cheng, Z. & Spinks, G. M. Triaxial braided piezo fiber energy harvesters for self-powered wearable technologies. J. Mater. Chem. A 7, 8245–8257 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Bandodkar, A. J. Wearable biofuel cells: past, present and future. J. Electrochem. Soc. 164, H3007–H3014 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Chen, X. et al. Stretchable and flexible buckypaper-based lactate biofuel cell for wearable electronics. Adv. Funct. Mater. 29, 1905785 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Yu, Y. et al. Biofuel-powered soft electronic skin with multiplexed and wireless sensing for human-machine interfaces. Sci. Robot. 5, eaaz7946 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Hu, X. et al. Nacre-inspired crystallization and elastic “brick-and-mortar” structure for a wearable perovskite solar module. Energy Environ. Sci. 12, 979–987 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    O’Connor, T. F. et al. Wearable organic solar cells with high cyclic bending stability: materials selection criteria. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 144, 438–444 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Li, C. et al. Flexible perovskite solar cell-driven photo-rechargeable lithium-ion capacitor for self-powered wearable strain sensors. Nano Energy 60, 247–256 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ostfeld, A. E., Gaikwad, A. M., Khan, Y. & Arias, A. C. High-performance flexible energy storage and harvesting system for wearable electronics. Sci. Rep. 6, 26122 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Huang, X. et al. Epidermal radio frequency electronics for wireless power transfer. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 2, 16052 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Bito, J., Hester, J. G. & Tentzeris, M. M. Ambient RF energy harvesting from a two-way talk radio for flexible wearable wireless sensor devices utilizing inkjet printing technologies. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 63, 4533–4543 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Rose, D. P. et al. Adhesive RFID sensor patch for monitoring of sweat electrolytes. IEEE Trans. Biomed. 62, 1457–1465 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Bandodkar, A. J. et al. Battery-free, skin-interfaced microfluidic/electronic systems for simultaneous electrochemical, colorimetric, and volumetric analysis of sweat. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav3294 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Niu, S. et al. A wireless body area sensor network based on stretchable passive tags. Nat. Electron. 2, 361–368 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Liu, W., Song, M. S., Kong, B. & Cui, Y. Flexible and stretchable energy storage: recent advances and future perspectives. Adv. Mater. 29, 1603436 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Zhang, Y., Zhao, Y., Ren, J., Weng, W. & Peng, H. Advances in wearable fiber‐shaped lithium‐ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 28, 4524–4531 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Liu, Q.-C. et al. A flexible and wearable lithium–oxygen battery with record energy density achieved by the interlaced architecture inspired by bamboo slips. Adv. Mater. 28, 8413–8418 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Kumar, R. et al. All‐printed, stretchable Zn‐Ag2O rechargeable battery via hyperelastic binder for self‐powering wearable electronics. Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 1602096 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Ji, D. et al. Atomically transition metals on self‐supported porous carbon flake arrays as binder‐free air cathode for wearable zinc−air batteries. Adv. Mater. 31, 1808267 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Li, H. et al. An extremely safe and wearable solid-state zinc ion battery based on a hierarchical structured polymer electrolyte. Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 941–951 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Berchmans, S. et al. An epidermal alkaline rechargeable Ag–Zn printable tattoo battery for wearable electronics. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 15788–15795 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Yang, Y. et al. Waterproof, ultrahigh areal‐capacitance, wearable supercapacitor fabrics. Adv. Mater. 29, 1606679 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Rajendran, V., Mohan, A. M. V., Jayaraman, M. & Nakagawa, T. All-printed, interdigitated, freestanding serpentine interconnects based flexible solid state supercapacitor for self powered wearable electronics. Nano Energy 65, 104055 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Lee, K. B. Urine-activated paper batteries for biosystems. J. Micromech. Microeng. 15, S210–S214 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Koo, Y., Sankar, J. & Yun, Y. High performance magnesium anode in paper-based microfluidic battery, powering on-chip fluorescence assay. Biomicrofluidics 8, 054104 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Ortega, L., Llorella, A., Esquivel, J. P. & Sabaté, N. Self-powered smart patch for sweat conductivity monitoring. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 5, 3 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    She, D., Tsang, M. & Allen, M. Biodegradable batteries with immobilized electrolyte for transient MEMS. Biomed. Microdevices 21, 17 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Liu, G. et al. A wearable conductivity sensor for wireless real-time sweat monitoring. Sens. Actuators B 227, 35–42 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Emrich, H. M. et al. Sweat composition in relation to rate of sweating in patients with cystic fibrosis of the pancreas. Pediatr. Res. 2, 464–478 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Buono, M. J., Ball, K. D. & Kolkhorst, F. W. Sodium ion concentration vs. sweat rate relationship in humans. J. Appl. Physiol. 103, 990–994 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Bandodkar, A. J. et al. Soft, skin-interfaced microfluidic systems with passive galvanic stopwatches for precise chronometric sampling of sweat. Adv. Mater. 31, 1902109 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Kong, Y., Wang, C., Yang, Y., Too, C. O. & Wallace, G. G. A battery composed of a polypyrrole cathode and a magnesium alloy anode—toward a bioelectric battery. Synth. Met. 162, 584–589 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Williams, G. & McMurray, H. N. Localized corrosion of magnesium in chloride-containing electrolyte studied by a scanning vibrating electrode technique. J. Electrochem. Soc. 155, C340–C349 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Huang, W. et al. Nanostructural and electrochemical evolution of the solid-electrolyte interphase on CuO nanowires revealed by cryogenic-electron microscopy and impedance spectroscopy. ACS Nano 13, 737–744 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Cong, G., Wang, W., Lai, N.-C., Liang, Z. & Lu, Y.-C. A high-rate and long-life organic–oxygen battery. Nat. Mater. 18, 390 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Peng, G. S., Chen, K. H., Fang, H. C., Chao, H. & Chen, S. Y. EIS study on pitting corrosion of 7150 aluminum alloy in sodium chloride and hydrochloric acid solution. Mater. Corros. 61, 783–789 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Brett, C. M. A. On the electrochemical behaviour of aluminium in acidic chloride solution. Corros. Sci. 33, 203–210 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Choi, D.-H., Kim, J. S., Cutting, G. R. & Searson, P. C. Wearable potentiometric chloride sweat sensor: the critical role of the salt bridge. Anal. Chem. 88, 12241–12247 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Choi, J. et al. Soft, skin-mounted microfluidic systems for measuring secretory fluidic pressures generated at the surface of the skin by eccrine sweat glands. Lab Chip 17, 2572–2580 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Twine, N. B. et al. Open nanofluidic films with rapid transport and no analyte exchange for ultra-low sample volumes. Lab Chip 18, 2816–2825 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Wang, R. et al. Accuracy of wrist-worn heart rate monitors. JAMA Cardiol. 2, 104–106 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Emaminejad, S. et al. Autonomous sweat extraction and analysis applied to cystic fibrosis and glucose monitoring using a fully integrated wearable platform. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 4625–4630 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) Human Signatures Branch through Core funds provided to Northwestern University under contract FA8650-14-D-6516. S.W., T.H. and S.M. acknowledge support from the ‘Top Open’ programme (Tsinghua University, P. R. China), the visiting scholar programme (grant no. 201706235005, China Scholarship Council) and the Indo-US Science and Technology Forum (grant no. SERB-IUSSTF-2017/192) respectively. This work utilized the Northwestern University Micro/Nano Fabrication Facility (NUFAB), which is partially supported by the Soft and Hybrid Nanotechnology Experimental (SHyNE) resource (NSF ECCS-1542205), the Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (DMR-1720139), the State of Illinois and Northwestern University.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.A.R., A.J.B., R.G. and S.P.L. conceived the project, designed the studies and analysed and interpreted the data. A.J.B. designed and developed the batteries, microfluidics, pH sensor and chloride sensor. S.P.L. designed and developed the electronics. W.L. developed the firmware. A.J.B., I.H., S.W., T.H., S.M. and N.N. worked on testing and optimizing the batteries. S.P.L., C.-J.S. and P.G. worked on fabricating and testing of the electronics. A.J.B. and J.C. worked on fabricating the microfluidics. J.K. assisted in optical studies. W.J.J., J.T.R. and R.T. assisted in testing the devices. A.J.B., S.P.L., W.J.J., I.H., R.G. and J.A.R. composed the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to R. Ghaffari or J. A. Rogers.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

J.A.R., S.P.L., W.L. and R.G. are cofounders and/or employees of Epicore Biosystems, Inc., a company that pursues commercialization of microfluidic devices for wearable applications.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–9, discussion, equations and Table 1.

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bandodkar, A.J., Lee, S.P., Huang, I. et al. Sweat-activated biocompatible batteries for epidermal electronic and microfluidic systems. Nat Electron 3, 554–562 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-020-0443-7

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing