Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Three-dimensional radio-frequency transformers based on a self-rolled-up membrane platform

Abstract

Radio-frequency (RF) integrated circuits are used for wireless communications and require transformers capable of transferring electrical energy at RF/microwave frequencies. Traditional on-chip RF transformer designs have complex fabrication schemes and offer limited performance scalability. Here we report on-chip RF/microwave transformers that are based on a self-rolled-up membrane platform. The monolithic nature and versatility of this platform allows us to create high-performance transformers while maintaining an ultra-compact device footprint and by using only planar processing. We also show that the performance of the three-dimensional RF transformers improves with scaling, which is in contrast to conventional planar designs. In particular, we observe a continuous rate of increase in the index of performance of our RF transformers as we scale up the turns ratio. This behaviour is attributed to the almost ideal mutual magnetic coupling inherent to the self-rolled-up membrane three-dimensional architecture.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Schematic illustration of the 3D S-RUM transformer fabrication process flow.
Fig. 2: S-RUM transformer design layout and fabrication results.
Fig. 3: Fabrication controllability, and thermal and mechanical stabilities of the S-RUM micro-transformers.
Fig. 4: Performance of S-RUM transformers before and after thermal annealing for Sample B1-C1, and the index of performance benchmarking with literature counterparts.
Fig. 5: Extended performance comparison between on-chip S-RUM air-core RF/microwave transformer tested and simulated samples and their planar on-chip counterparts in the literature.

References

  1. 1.

    Osseiran, A., Elloumi, O., Song, J. & Monserrat, J. F. Internet of Things. IEEE Commun. Stand. Mag. 1, 84 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Perkel, J. M. The Internet of Things comes to the lab. Nat. News 542, 125 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bubnova, O. Wearable electronics: stretching the limits. Nat. Nanotech. 12, 101 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Leite, B., Kerherve, E., Begueret, J. B. & Belot, D. An analytical broadband model for millimeter-wave transformers in silicon technologies. IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 59, 582–589 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Chen, Y.-M., Liu, Y.-C. & Wu, F.-Y. Multi-input DC/DC converter based on the multiwinding transformer for renewable energy applications. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 38, 1096–1104 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Huang, Q. A., Dong, L. & Wang, L. F. LC passive wireless sensors toward a wireless sensing platform: status, prospects, and challenges. J. Micro. Syst. 25, 822–841 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ganji, B. A. & Molanzadeh, M. High performance planar micro-transformer using novel crossover connection. Microsyst. Technol. 23, 4413–4418 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Luong, H. C. & Yin, J. Transformer-Based Design Techniques for Oscillators and Frequency Dividers (Springer, Berlin, 2015).

  9. 9.

    Ng, K. T., Rejaei, B. & Burghartz, J. N. Substrate effects in monolithic RF transformers on silicon. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 50, 377–383 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Chong, K. & Xie, Y.-H. High-performance on-chip transformers. IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 26, 557–559 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Niknejad, A. M. & Meyer, R. G. Analysis of eddy-current losses over conductive substrates with applications to monolithic inductors and transformers. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 49, 166–176 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Zhan, Y., Mei, Y. & Zheng, L. Materials capability and device performance in flexible electronics for the Internet of Things. J. Mater. Chem. C 2, 1220–1232 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Hsu, H. M., Lai, S. H. & Hsu, C. J. Compact layout of on-chip transformer. IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 57, 1076–1083 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Cho, E., Lee, S., Lee, J. & Nam, S. A high-efficient transformer using bond wires for Si RF IC. IEICE Trans. Electron. E93–C, 140–141 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Hsu, H. M. & Chien, C. T. Multiple turn ratios of on-chip transformer with four intertwining coils. IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 61, 44–47 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Hsu, H. M. & Chen, K. Y. High turn ratio and high coupling coefficient transformer in 90-nm CMOS technology. IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 30, 535–537 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Choi, Y.-S., Yoon, J.-B., Kim, B.-I. & Yoon, E. in Technical Digest MEMS 2002 IEEE International Conference 653–656 (IEEE, 2002).

  18. 18.

    Macrelli, E. et al. Modeling, design, and fabrication of high-inductance bond wire microtransformers with toroidal ferrite core. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 30, 5724–5737 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Moazenzadeh, A., Sandoval, F. S., Spengler, N., Badilita, V. & Wallrabe, U. 3D microtransformers for DC–DC on-chip power conversion. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 30, 5088–5102 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Macrelli, E. et al. Design and fabrication of a 315 μH bondwire micro-transformer for ultra-low voltage energy harvesting. 2014 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference Exhibition (DATE) 1–4 (IEEE, 2014).

  21. 21.

    Macrelli, E. et al. Design and fabrication of a 29 μH bondwire micro-transformer with LTCC magnetic core on silicon for energy harvesting applications. Procedia Eng. 87, 1557–1560 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Schmidt, O. G., Schmarje, N., Deneke, C., Müller, C. & Jin-Phillipp, N.-Y. Three-dimensional nano-objects evolving from a two-dimensional layer technology. Adv. Mater. 13, 756–759 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Tian, Z., Li, F., Mi, Z. & Plant, D. V. Controlled transfer of single rolled-up InGaAs/GaAs quantum-dot microtube ring resonators using optical fiber abrupt tapers. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 22, 311–313 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Huang, G. et al. Rolled-up optical microcavities with subwavelength wall thicknesses for enhanced liquid sensing applications. ACS Nano 4, 3123–3130 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Tang, S., Fang, Y., Liu, Z., Zhou, L. & Mei, Y. Tubular optical microcavities of indefinite medium for sensitive liquid refractometers. Lab. Chip 16, 182–187 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Huang, W. et al. On-chip inductors with self-rolled-up SiNx nanomembrane tubes: a novel design platform for extreme miniaÿturization. Nano Lett. 12, 6283–6288 2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Yu, X. et al. Ultra-small, high-frequency, and substrate-immune microtube inductors transformed from 2D to 3D. Sci. Rep. 5, 9661 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Froeter, P. et al. Toward intelligent synthetic neural circuits: directing and accelerating neuron cell growth by self-rolled-up silicon nitride microtube array. ACS Nano 8, 11108–11117 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Li, X. Strain induced semiconductor nanotubes: from formation process to device applications. J. Phys. Appl. Phys. 41, 193001 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Li, X. Self-rolled-up microtube ring resonators: a review of geometrical and resonant properties. Adv. Opt. Photon. 3, 366–387 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Froeter, P. et al. 3D hierarchical architectures based on self-rolled-up silicon nitride membranes. Nanotechnology 24, 475301 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Tian, Z. et al. Deterministic self-rolling of ultrathin nanocrystalline diamond nanomembranes for 3D tubular/helical architecture. Adv. Mater. 29, 1604572 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Huang, W., Koric, S., Yu, X., Hsia, K. J. & Li, X. Precision structural engineering of self-rolled-up 3D nanomembranes guided by transient quasi-static FEM modeling. Nano Lett. 14, 6293–6297 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Chun, I., Challa, A., Derickson, B., Hisa, J. & Li, X. Geometry effect on the strain-induced self-rolling of semiconductor membranes. Nano Lett. 10, 3927–3932 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Zhang, Y. et al. Printing, folding and assembly methods for forming 3D mesostructures in advanced materials. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 17019 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Huang, W. et al. in 2017 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium (IMS) 1645–1648 (IEEE, 2017).

  37. 37.

    Huang, W., Li, M., Gong, S. & Li, X. RFIC transformer with 12x size reduction and 15x performance enhancement by self-rolled-up membrane nanotechnology. 2015 ASME International Technical Conference and Exhibition on Packaging and Integration of Electronic and Photonic Microsystems https://doi.org/10.1115/IPACK2015-48585 (ASME, 2015).

  38. 38.

    Huang, W., Li, M., Gong, S. & Li, X. in 2015 73rd Annual Device Research Conference (DRC) 223–224 (IEEE, 2015).

  39. 39.

    Huang, W. et al. in 2013 71st Annual Device Research Conference (DRC) 227–228 (IEEE, 2013).

  40. 40.

    Hsieh, M. C., Jair, D. K. & Lin, C. S. Design and fabrication of the suspended high-Q spiral inductors with X-beams. Microsyst. Technol. 14, 903–907 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Tiemeijer, L. F., Pijper, R. M. T., Andrei, C. & Grenados, E. Analysis, design, modeling, and characterization of low-loss scalable on-chip transformers. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 61, 2545–2557 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Shi, J., Xiong, Y. Z., Brinkhoff, J., Issaoun, A. & Lin, F. Resistive coupling efficiency criterion for evaluating substrate shielding structures of transformers. IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 29, 114–117 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Niknejad, A. M. Analysis, Simulation, and Applications of Passive Devices on Conductive Substrates, PhD thesis, Univ. California, Berkeley (2000).

  44. 44.

    Mayevskiy, Y., Watson, A., Francis, P., Hwang, K. & Weisshaar, A. A new compact model for monolithic transformers in silicon-based RFICs. IEEE Microw. Wireless Compon. Lett. 15, 419–421 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    El-Gharniti, O., Kerherve, E. & Begueret, J. B. Modeling and characterization of on-chip transformers for silicon RFIC. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 55, 607–615 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge support from the US Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences (BES) under award no. DEFG02-07ER46471 (materials development), and the National Science Foundation under awards EEC 1449548 (device design, model and electrical testing), ECCS 1309375 (fabrication process development) and IIP 17-01047 (yield optimization).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

X.L. designed and supervised the research. W.H. led the structural designs, mechanical modelling and electromagnetic modelling. W.H. and J.Z. led the fabrication of all samples, with assistance from S.L., M.D.K., M.L. and J.A.M. W.H. and P.F. led the d.c. and RF electrical measurements, with assistance from M.L., D.J.S., J.Z. and S.G. K.W. led the mechanical measurements, with assistance from W.H. and P.F. All authors commented on the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiuling Li.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Notes 1–9, Supplementary Figures 1–8 and Supplementary Tables 1–6

Supplementary Video 1

Simulation of self-rolling of self-rolled-up membrane transformer.

Supplementary Video 2

Magnetic field distribution around self-rolled-up membrane.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, W., Zhou, J., Froeter, P.J. et al. Three-dimensional radio-frequency transformers based on a self-rolled-up membrane platform. Nat Electron 1, 305–313 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-018-0073-5

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing