Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Analysis
  • Published:

Global effects of progress towards Sustainable Development Goals on subjective well-being

Nature Sustainability volume 7, pages 360–367 (2024)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

As common pursuits of human society, subjective well-being (SWB) strongly depends on economic factors, and the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) emphasize promoting equilibrium between socio-economic development and environmental conservation. Therefore, trade-offs between narrowing existing progress differences across SDGs and improving SWB might exist, which could interfere with global policy-making for human development but remain unexplored. Here we investigate the changing effects of achieving balance across SDGs and other factors on SWB along the global sustainable development gradient. Results show that achieving balance across goals, rather than their average performance or per capita gross domestic product, is the primary factor supporting well-being in countries with poorly progressed SDGs. However, SWB in countries approaching fulfillment of sustainable development depends more on wealth rather than on achieving balance across SDGs. Given the trade-offs between economic development and poorly achieved goals (for example, SDG 13, Climate Action) in these countries, the strong dependence of well-being on wealth might impede the holistic achievement of the 17 goals. Overall, our study uncovers an essential but long-neglected subjective control factor in the global road map towards SDGs.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Changing partial correlations between SWB and SDG evenness or per capita GDP, along the MIS gradient.
Fig. 2: Sensitivity analysis of the changing partial correlations between SWB and SDG evenness or per capita GDP, along the MIS gradient.
Fig. 3: Changing partial correlations between SWB and SDG evenness or per capita GDP.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data are available in Sustainable Development Report 2020 (https://www.sustainabledevelopment.report/reports/sustainable-development-report-2020/), except for each country’s per capita GDP in 2019, which was obtained from the International Monetary Fund (https://data.imf.org/). A source data file including all raw data used in this study and source data for figures and tables presented in the main article is also attached. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Diener, E., Oishi, S. & Tay, L. Advances in subjective well-being research. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2, 253–260 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Diener, E. Subjective well-being. Psychol. Bull. 95, 542–575 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Helliwell, J. F., Layard, R., Sachs, J. & De Neve, J.-E. World Happiness Report 2020 (Sustainable Development Solutions Network, 2020).

  4. Stevenson, B. & Wolfers, J. Economic growth and subjective well-being: reassessing the Easterlin paradox. Brookings Pap. Econ. Act. 1, 1–87 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hagerty, M.R. & Veenhoven, R. Wealth and happiness revisited-growing national income does go with greater happiness. Soc. Indic. Res. 64, 1–27 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sachs, J., Kroll, C., Lafortune, G., Fuller, G. & Woelm, F. The Decade of Action for the Sustainable Development Goals: Sustainable Development Report 2021 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).

  7. McGuire, J., Kaiser, C. & Bach-Mortensen, A. M. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of cash transfers on subjective well-being and mental health in low- and middle-income countries. Nat. Hum. Behav. 6, 359–370 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R. J. & Oswald, A. J. Preferences over inflation and unemployment: evidence from surveys of happiness. Am. Econ. Rev. 91, 335–341 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ngan Lam Thi, T., Wassmer, R. W. & Lascher, E. L. Jr The health insurance and life satisfaction connection. J. Happiness Stud. 18, 409–426 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaisa, K. & Jani-Petri, L. Welfare state and life satisfaction: evidence from public health care. Economica 77, 565–583 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bonasia, M., De Simone, E., D’Uva, M. & Napolitano, O. Environmental protection and happiness: a long-run relationship in Europe. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 93, 106704 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li, Y. et al. A psychophysical measurement on subjective well-being and air pollution. Nat. Commun. 10, 5473 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li, Y., Guan, D., Tao, S., Wang, X. & He, K. A review of air pollution impact on subjective well-being: survey versus visual psychophysics. J. Clean. Prod. 184, 959–968 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sustainable Development Goals: 17 Goals to Transform Our World (United Nations, 2015).

  15. Liu, Y. et al. Evenness is important in assessing progress towards sustainable development goals. Natl Sci. Rev. 8, nwaa238 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Xu, Z. et al. Assessing progress towards sustainable development over space and time. Nature 577, 74–78 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Li, G. E. et al. Monitoring the spatiotemporal dynamics of poor counties in China: implications for global sustainable development goals. J. Clean. Prod. 227, 392–404 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pablos-Mendez, A., Cavanaugh, K. & Ly, C. The new era of health goals: universal health coverage as a pathway to the sustainable development goals. Health Syst. Reform. 2, 15–17 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Du, G., Shin, K. J. & Managi, S. Variability in impact of air pollution on subjective well-being. Atmos. Environ. 183, 175–208 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Schmitt, M. Subjective well-being and air quality in Germany. Schmollers Jahrb. 133, 275–286 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Du, J. et al. Climatic resources mediate the shape and strength of grassland productivity–richness relationships from local to regional scales. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 330, 107888 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu, X. et al. Decoupling of SDGs followed by re-coupling as sustainable development progresses. Nat. Sustain. 5, 452–459 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liebig, J. Chemistry in Its Application to Agriculture and Physiology (Taylor and Walton, 1842).

  24. Krueger, A. B. & Stone, A. A. Progress in measuring subjective well-being. Science 346, 42–43 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu, L., Di, B. & Zhang, M. The tradeoff between ecological protection and economic growth in China’s county development: evidence from the soil and water conservation projects during 2011–2015. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 156, 104745 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rees, W. E. Economic development and environmental protection: an ecological economics perspective. Environ. Monit. Assess. 86, 29–45 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ostro, B. Outdoor Air Pollution: Assessing the Environmental Burden of Disease at National and Local Levels (World Health Organization, 2004).

  28. Lave, L. B. & Seskin, E. P. Air pollution and human health: the quantitative effect, with an estimate of the dollar benefit of pollution abatement, is considered. Science 169, 723–733 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Evans, G. W. & Jacobs, S. V. Air pollution and human behavior. J. Soc. Issues 37, 95–125 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. MacKerron, G. & Mourato, S. Life satisfaction and air quality in London. Ecol. Econ. 68, 1441–1453 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Han, D., Yu, D. & Qiu, J. Assessing coupling interactions in a safe and just operating space for regional sustainability. Nat. Commun. 14, 1369 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Huang, J. Income inequality, distributive justice beliefs, and happiness in China: evidence from a nationwide survey. Soc. Indic. Res. 142, 83–105 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Knight, J. & Gunatilaka, R. in CSAE Working Paper Series Vol. 11 (Centre for the Study of African Economies, Univ. Oxford, 2021).

  34. Ajide, K. B. & Ibrahim, R. L. Environmental impacts of income inequality: evidence from G7 economies. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 29, 1887–1908 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhou, A. & Li, J. Impact of income inequality and environmental regulation on environmental quality: evidence from China. J. Clean. Prod. 274, 123008 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Masud, M. M., Kari, F. B., Banna, H. & Saifullah, M. K. Does income inequality affect environmental sustainability? Evidence from the ASEAN-5. J. Asia Pac. Econ. 23, 213–228 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu, J. et al. Nexus approaches to global sustainable development. Nat. Sustain. 1, 466–476 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Brun, P. et al. The productivity–biodiversity relationship varies across diversity dimensions. Nat. Commun. 10, 5691 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Willig, M. R. Biodiversity and productivity. Science 333, 1709–1710 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Chase, J. M. & Leibold, M. A. Spatial scale dictates the productivity–biodiversity relationship. Nature 416, 427–430 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Grime, J. P. Competitive exclusion in herbaceous vegetation. Nature 242, 344–347 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Fraser, L. H. et al. Worldwide evidence of a unimodal relationship between productivity and plant species richness. Science 349, 302–305 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Sharfman, M. P., Wolf, G., Chase, R. B. & Tansik, D. A. Antecedents of organizational slack. Acad. Manag. Rev. 13, 601–614 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Naidoo, R. & Fisher, B. Reset sustainable development goals for a pandemic world. Nature 583, 198–201 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Liu, Y. et al. Water resource conservation promotes synergy between economy and environment in China’s northern drylands. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 16, 28 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhu, J. et al. Progress and water stress of sustainable development in Chinese northern drylands. J. Clean. Prod. 399, 136611 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Sachs, J. et al. The Sustainable Development Goals and COVID-19: Sustainable Development Report 2020 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2020).

  48. Smith, B. & Wilson, J. B. A consumer’s guide to evenness indices. Oikos 76, 70–82 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Wang, Y. et al. Unimodal productivity–biodiversity relationship along the gradient of multidimensional resources across Chinese grasslands. Natl Sci. Rev. 9, nwac165 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42001267 (Y.L.), 42041005 (Y.W.) and 42041007 (B.F.)), the International Partnership Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (121311KYSB20170004-04 (Y.W.)) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021T140655 (Y.L.)).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    Jianqing Du & Yanfen Wang

  2. Beijing Yanshan Earth Critical Zone National Research Station, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    Jianqing Du & Yanfen Wang

  3. School of Grassland Science, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China

    Yali Liu

  4. Department of Geography, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China

    Zhenci Xu

  5. Peng Cheng Laboratory, Shenzhen, China

    Zhenci Xu

  6. School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    Hongbo Duan, Yi Hu & Jichang Dong

  7. College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China

    Minghao Zhuang

  8. Institute of Science City Industry, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    Qiao Wang

  9. State Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Earth System, Environment and Resources (TPESER), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    Yanfen Wang

  10. State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    Bojie Fu

  11. State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China

    Bojie Fu

Authors
  1. Jianqing Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yali Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhenci Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hongbo Duan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Minghao Zhuang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yi Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Qiao Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jichang Dong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yanfen Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Bojie Fu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J. Du, Y.L. and Y.W. designed the research. Y.L. and J. Du analysed the data. J. Du wrote the paper with input from Y.L., Y.W. and B.F. Z.X., H.D., M.Z., Y.H., Q.W. and J. Dong provided comments on the paper. All authors reviewed the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yali Liu or Yanfen Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Sustainability thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–6 and Tables 1–3.

Reporting Summary

Source data

Source Data Figs. 1–3 and Table 1

Statistical source data.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Du, J., Liu, Y., Xu, Z. et al. Global effects of progress towards Sustainable Development Goals on subjective well-being. Nat Sustain 7, 360–367 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-024-01270-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-024-01270-5

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene