Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Future reductions of China’s transport emissions impacted by changing driving behaviour

Nature Sustainability volume 6, pages 1228–1236 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

This paper examines what individual drivers can contribute to reduce global vehicle emissions in their daily driving. Here we analyse vehicle emissions from the behavioural perspective with the aim of identifying ways in which drivers can reduce emissions by modifying their driving behaviour. We propose an indicator, the Standardized Driver Aggressiveness Index, to estimate the changes in private vehicle driving behaviour and perform estimates based on the real-world vehicular trajectory data collected from 2013 to 2021 in China. We then develop a forward-looking integrated assessment model to predict the extra vehicle emissions that would be induced by various types of car-following behaviour, for example, calm, neutral and aggressive behaviour. Our results indicate that by 2050, the cumulative emissions linked to driving behaviour that could be prevented will amount to 400.5 million tons of CO2. Our findings highlight the importance of considering behavioural changes as part of the solution to mitigate transport emissions, and underline the urgent need for interventions that can lead drivers to adopting more sustainable driving behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Driving aggressiveness quantification and clustering results.
Fig. 2: Driver aggressiveness and corresponding driving behaviours.
Fig. 3: Correlation between SDAI and major pollutant emissions within a typical car-following response phase.
Fig. 4: Vehicle ownership, distribution, age and emission standards in China.
Fig. 5: Driver aggressiveness prediction and average single-time car-following response emissions.
Fig. 6: Prediction of pollutant and CO2 emissions during the car-following phase in China.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The 2013 and 2014 raw datasets are available on reasonable request to the authors due to third-party data usage restrictions during data collection, and the processed data used in the experiments are available in the following Zenodo repository: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7978905 ref. 41. The 2018 dataset is publicly available from UTE Project by Southeast University, which can be downloaded from the following website: http://seutraffic.com. The 2021 dataset is publicly available from TJRD TS Project by Tongji University, which can be downloaded from the following website: https://tjrdts.com.

Code availability

The code for accumulated vehicle emissions estimation is available at the following Zenodo repository: https://zenodo.org/record/7978905 ref. 41.

References

  1. Creutzig, F. et al. Transport: a roadblock to climate change mitigation? Science 350, 911–912 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Transport: Sectoral overview (International Energy Agency, 2022); https://www.iea.org/reports/transport

  3. Xing, X. et al. Predicting the effect of confinement on the COVID-19 spread using machine learning enriched with satellite air pollution observations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2109098118 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zheng, B. et al. Satellite-based estimates of decline and rebound in China’s CO2 emissions during COVID-19 pandemic. Sci. Adv. 6, eabd4998 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang, J. et al. From COVID-19 to future electrification: assessing traffic impacts on air quality by a machine-learning model. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2102705118 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jiang, Z. et al. Unexpected slowdown of US pollutant emission reduction in the past decade. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 5099–5104 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, Q. et al. Drivers of improved PM2.5 air quality in China from 2013 to 2017. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 24463–24469 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, H. et al. Health benefits of on-road transportation pollution control programs in China. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 25370–25377 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Da, P. et al. Methane emissions from natural gas vehicles in China. Nat. Commun. 11, 4588 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Turner, M. C. et al. Outdoor air pollution and cancer: an overview of the current evidence and public health recommendations. CA Cancer J. Clin. 70, 460–479 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu, Y. et al. Role of climate goals and clean-air policies on reducing future air pollution deaths in China: a modelling study. Lancet Planet. Health 6, e92–e99 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stafoggia, M. et al. Long-term exposure to low ambient air pollution concentrations and mortality among 28 million people: results from seven large European cohorts within the ELAPSE project. Lancet Planet. Health 6, e9–e18 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Meys, R. et al. Achieving net-zero greenhouse gas emission plastics by a circular carbon economy. Science 374, 71–76 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rogelj, J. et al. Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 °C. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 325–332 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Air Quality Index (AQI) (Air Now, 2022); https://www.airnow.gov/aqi/

  16. EU Air Quality Standards (European Cimmission, 2022); https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/air/air-quality/eu-air-quality-standards_en

  17. Acid Deposition Monitoring Network in East Asia (EANET, 2022).

  18. Lin, Y., Qin, Y., Wu, J. & Xu, M. Impact of high-speed rail on road traffic and greenhouse gas emissions. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 952–957 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kelly, F. J. & Zhu, T. Transport solutions for cleaner air. Science 352, 934–936 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Isik, M., Dodder, R. & Kaplan, P. O. Transportation emissions scenarios for New York City under different carbon intensities of electricity and electric vehicle adoption rates. Nat. Energy 6, 92–104 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Knobloch, F. et al. Net emission reductions from electric cars and heat pumps in 59 world regions over time. Nat. Sustain. 3, 437–447 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Milovanoff, A., Posen, I. D. & MacLean, H. L. Electrification of light-duty vehicle fleet alone will not meet mitigation targets. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 1102–1107 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pauliuk, S. et al. Global scenarios of resource and emission savings from material efficiency in residential buildings and cars. Nat. Commun. 12, 5097 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wolfram, P., Weber, S., Gillingham, K. & Hertwich, E. G. Pricing indirect emissions accelerates low-carbon transition of US light vehicle sector. Nat. Commun. 12, 7121 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang, F., Xie, Y., Deng, Y. & Yuan, C. Predictive modeling of battery degradation and greenhouse gas emissions from US state-level electric vehicle operation. Nat. Commun. 9, 2429 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kikstra, J. S. et al. Climate mitigation scenarios with persistent COVID-19-related energy demand changes. Nat. Energy 6, 1114–1123 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Probst, B., Touboul, S., Glachant, M. & Dechezleprêtre, A. Global trends in the invention and diffusion of climate change mitigation technologies. Nat. Energy 6, 1077–1086 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mercure, J. F. et al. Reframing incentives for climate policy action. Nat. Energy 6, 1133–1143 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sentoff, K. M., Aultman-Hall, L. & Holmén, B. A. Implications of driving style and road grade for accurate vehicle activity data and emissions estimates. Transp. Res. D 35, 175–188 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mensing, F., Bideaux, E., Trigui, R., Ribet, J. & Jeanneret, B. Eco-driving: an economic or ecologic driving style? Transp. Res. C 38, 110–121 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chen, D., Laval, J., Zheng, Z. & Ahn, S. A behavioral car-following model that captures traffic oscillations. Transp. Res. B 46, 744–761 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Laval, J. A. & Leclercq, L. A mechanism to describe the formation and propagation of stop-and-go waves in congested freeway traffic. Philo Trans. R. Soc. A 368, 4519–4541 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Jenks, G. F. The data model concept in statistical mapping. Int. Yearb. Cartogr. 7, 186–190 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Vaa, T. From Gibson and Crooks to Damasio: the role of psychology in the development of driver behaviour models. Transp. Res. F 25, 112–119 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. China Mobile Source Environmental Management Annual Report (Ministry of Ecology and Environment, 2022); https://www.mee.gov.cn/hjzl/sthjzk/ydyhjgl/

  36. House, K. Z. et al. Economic and energetic analysis of capturing CO2 from ambient air. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 20428–20433 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Greenblatt, J. B. & Saxena, S. Autonomous taxis could greatly reduce greenhouse-gas emissions of US light-duty vehicles. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 860–863 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Michalek, J. J. et al. Valuation of plug-in vehicle life-cycle air emissions and oil displacement benefits. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 16554–16558 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Newell, G. F. A simplified car-following theory: a lower order model. Transp. Res. B 36, 195–205 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Frey, H. C. & Liu, B. In Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board (2013).

  41. Liao, C. Agressive-driving-emissions. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7978905 (2023).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (72288101) (Z.G.) and (72171210) (X.C.), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M702819) (Y.X.), Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LZ23E080002) (X.C.), National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020AAA0107400) (X.C.) and the Smart Urban Future (SURF) Laboratory, Zhejiang Province (X.C.).

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Yingji Xia, Chenlei Liao.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Intelligent Transportation Systems, College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

    Yingji Xia, Chenlei Liao, Xiqun (Michael) Chen, Zheng Zhu, Xiaorui Chen & Lixing Wang

  2. Zhejiang University/University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (ZJU-UIUC) Institute, Zhejiang University, Haining, China

    Xiqun (Michael) Chen

  3. School of Systems Science, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China

    Rui Jiang & Ziyou Gao

  4. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, UK

    Marc E. J. Stettler & Panagiotis Angeloudis

Authors
  1. Yingji Xia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chenlei Liao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiqun (Michael) Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zheng Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiaorui Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lixing Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Rui Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Marc E. J. Stettler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Panagiotis Angeloudis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Ziyou Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Y.X., C.L., X.(M.)C. and Z.Z. proposed the question. X.C. and L.W. designed and conducted the experiments. Y.X., R.J., Z.G. and X.(M.)C. developed the algorithms. Y.X., X.(M.)C., M.E.J.S. and P.A. wrote the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiqun (Michael) Chen or Ziyou Gao.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Sustainability thanks Yao-Jan Wu and Ruimin Li for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–10, Tables 1–18, Notes 1 and 2 and references.

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xia, Y., Liao, C., Chen, X.(. et al. Future reductions of China’s transport emissions impacted by changing driving behaviour. Nat Sustain 6, 1228–1236 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-023-01173-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-023-01173-x

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing