Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a prominent methodology for evaluating potential environmental impacts of products throughout their entire lifespan. However, LCA studies often lack transparency and comparability, limiting their significance. Here, recommendations for best practices for LCA are provided, exemplified by its application to batteries.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Get just this article for as long as you need it
$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References
Castelvecchi, D. Nature 596, 336–339 (2021).
Pacañot, V. D. J. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 3, 224 (2022).
Peters, J. F., Baumann, M., Zimmermann, B., Braun, J. & Weil, M. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 67, 491–506 (2017).
Porzio, J. & Scown, C. D. Adv. Energy Mater. 11, 2100771 (2021).
Pellow, M. A., Ambrose, H., Mulvaney, D., Betita, R. & Shaw, S. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 23, e00120 (2020).
European Commission. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning batteries and waste batteries, repealing Directive 2006/66/EC and amending Regulation (EU) No 2019/1020. COM/2020/798 final (European Commission, 2020).
Knehr, K. W., Kubal, J. J., Nelson, P. A. & Ahmed, S. Battery Performance and Cost Modeling for Electric-Drive Vehicles: A Manual for BatPaC v5.0. Report No. ANL/CSE-22/1 (Argonne National Laboratory, 2022); https://doi.org/10.2172/1877590
Peters, J. F., Baumann, M., Binder, J. R. & Weil, M. Sustain. Energy Fuels 5, 6414–6429 (2021).
Sutherland, B. R. Joule 4, 1630–1632 (2020).
Preger, Y. et al. J. Electrochem. Soc. 167, 120532 (2020).
dos Reis, G., Strange, C., Yadav, M. & Li, S. Energy AI 5, 100081 (2021).
Pehl, M. et al. Nat. Energy 2, 939–945 (2017).
Jordaan, S. M., Combs, C. & Guenther, E. Adv. Appl. Energy 3, 100058 (2021).
Dai, Q. et al. EverBatt: A Closed-loop Battery Recycling Cost and Environmental Impacts Model (Argonne National Laboratory, 2019).
European Commission. Commission Recommendation (EU) 2021/2279 of 15 December 2021 on the use of the Environmental Footprint methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performance of products and organisations (European Commission, 2021); http://data.europa.eu/eli/reco/2021/2279/oj/eng
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peters, J.F. Best practices for life cycle assessment of batteries. Nat Sustain (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-023-01067-y
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-023-01067-y