Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Opportunistic climate adaptation and public support for sand extraction in Greenland

Abstract

Climate change leads to the deposition of substantial amounts of sediment along the coasts of Kalaallit Nunaat (Greenland) amid rapidly growing global demand for these resources. Yet, little is known about what the predominantly Inuit population of Kalaallit Nunaat thinks about adaptation opportunities arising from the melt of the Greenland Ice Sheet. Here we conduct a nationally representative survey (N = 939) of Kalaallit (Greenlanders’) views on glacially derived sand extraction, finding that large majorities support extracting and exporting sand but oppose foreign involvement. This pattern of support persists at both the national and subnational levels. Public preferences largely align with Kalaallit Nunaat’s current mineral policy mandating environmental and economic impact assessments of new resource opportunities. In addition, those aware of human-caused climate change have significantly higher odds of both supporting sand extraction and prioritizing environmental impact assessment. Our results reveal broad support for domestically involved, environmentally assessed and economically appraised opportunistic adaptation to Greenland’s melting ice sheet and accumulating sand resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Public views in Kalaallit Nunaat on sand-related extraction, environmental policies and extra-national co-operation from a random-sample Kalaallit Nunaat nationwide survey (N = 939).
Fig. 2: Likelihood of adaptation preferences given awareness of human-caused climate change.
Fig. 3: Regional distribution of sand mining support and opposition and of glacially derived sand deposits.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available at https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/CQ4CY4 (ref. 78).

References

  1. Sverdrup, H. U., Koca, D. & Schlyter, P. A simple system dynamics model for the global production rate of sand, gravel, crushed rock and stone, market prices and long-term supply embedded into the WORLD6 model. BioPhys. Econ. Resour. Qual. 2, 8 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sand and Sustainability: 10 Strategic Recommendations to Avert a Crisis (Draft) (United Nations Environment Programme, 2022).

  3. Bendixen, M., Best, J., Hackney, C. & Iversen, L. L. Time is running out for sand. Nature 571, 29–31 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. IMBIE Team. Mass balance of the Greenland Ice Sheet from 1992 to 2018. Nature 579, 233–239 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bendixen, M. et al. Promises and perils of sand exploitation in Greenland. Nat. Sustain. 2, 98–104 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Thaarup, S. M., Poulsen, M. D., Thorsøe, K. & Keiding, J. K. Study on Arctic Mining in Greenland (Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment of Finland, 2020).

  7. Torres, A. et al. Sustainability of the global sand system in the Anthropocene. One Earth 4, 639–650 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Araos, M. et al. Equity in human adaptation-related responses: a systematic global review. One Earth https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.09.001 (2021).

  9. Berrang-Ford, L. et al. A systematic global stocktake of evidence on human adaptation to climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 989–1000 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosen, J. Cold truths at the top of the world. Nature 532, 296–299 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ewing, J. The world wants Greenland’s minerals, but Greenlanders are wary. New York Times (1 October 2021).

  12. Olsen, A.-S. H. & Hansen, A. M. Perceptions of public participation in impact assessment: a study of offshore oil exploration in Greenland. Impact Assess. Proj. Appraisal 32, 72–80 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hansen, A. M., Vanclay, F., Croal, P. & Skjervedal, A.-S. H. Managing the social impacts of the rapidly-expanding extractive industries in Greenland. Extr. Ind. Soc. 3, 25–33 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Poppel, B. Arctic oil & gas development: the case of Greenland. Arct. Yearb. 2018, 328 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Poppel, B., Kruse, J., Duhaime, G. & Abryutina, L. Survey of Living Conditions in the Arctic: Results (Institute of Social and Economic Research, University of Alaska Anchorage, 2007).

  16. Minor, K. et al. Greenlandic Perspectives on Climate Change 2018–2019: Results from a National Survey (University of Greenland and University of Copenhagen. Kraks Fond Institute for Urban Research, 2019).

  17. Dunlap, R. E. & Brulle, R. J. Climate Change and Society: Sociological Perspectives (Oxford Univ. Press, 2015).

  18. Dietz, T., Shwom, R. L. & Whitley, C. T. Climate change and society. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 46, 135–158 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gorokhovich, Y., Leiserowitz, A. & Dugan, D. Integrating coastal vulnerability and community-based subsistence resource mapping in northwest Alaska. J. Coast. Res. 30, 158–169 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. AMAP. Arctic Climate Change Update 2021: Key Trends and Impacts. Summary for Policy-makers. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP) 1–16 (Tromsø, Norway, 2021).

  21. Ramage, J. et al. Population living on permafrost in the Arctic. Popul. Environ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-020-00370-6 (2021).

  22. Hamilton, L. C., Brown, B. C. & Rasmussen, R. O. West Greenland’s cod-to-shrimp transition: local dimensions of climatic change. Arctic 56, 271–282 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Irrgang, A. M. et al. Drivers, dynamics and impacts of changing Arctic coasts. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 3, 39–54 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bendixen, M. et al. Delta progradation in Greenland driven by increasing glacial mass loss. Nature 550, 101–104 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Overeem, I. et al. Substantial export of suspended sediment to the global oceans from glacial erosion in Greenland. Nat. Geosci. 10, 859–863 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Begon, M. & Townsend, C. R. Ecology: From Individuals to Ecosystems (John Wiley & Sons, 2021).

  27. Canosa, I. V., Ford, J. D., McDowell, G., Jones, J. & Pearce, T. Progress in climate change adaptation in the Arctic. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 093009 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. van Valkengoed, A. M. & Steg, L. Meta-analyses of factors motivating climate change adaptation behaviour. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 158–163 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ford, J. D., McDowell, G. & Pearce, T. The adaptation challenge in the Arctic. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 1046–1053 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. O’Brien, K. & Selboe, E. The Adaptive Challenge of Climate Change (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2015).

  31. IPCC Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (eds Field, C. B. et al.) Part A, Vol. 1 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

  32. Pörtner, H. O. et al. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (Working Group II Contribution to the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report, 2022).

  33. Aastrup, P. et al. AMAP 2017: Adaptation Actions for a Changing Arctic—Perspectives from the Baffin Bay/Davis Strait Region (Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP), 2018).

  34. Nuttall, M. Greenland and the geopolitics of critical minerals. One Earth 4, 1674–1675 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Nuttall, M. Climate, Society and Subsurface Politics in Greenland: Under the Great Ice (Routledge, 2017).

  36. Mudryk, L. R. et al. Impact of 1, 2 and 4 °C of global warming on ship navigation in the Canadian Arctic. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 673–679 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Gewin, V. Polar research should include Indigenous perspectives. Nature 573, 453 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Thomas, D. S. G. & Twyman, C. Equity and justice in climate change adaptation amongst natural-resource-dependent societies. Glob. Environ. Change 15, 115–124 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Petheram, L., Zander, K. K., Campbell, B. M., High, C. & Stacey, N. ‘Strange changes’: Indigenous perspectives of climate change and adaptation in NE Arnhem Land (Australia). Glob. Environ. Change 20, 681–692 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Langton, M. & Mazel, O. Poverty in the midst of plenty: Aboriginal people, the ‘resource curse’ and Australia’s mining boom. J. Energy Nat. Resour. Law 26, 31–65 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Gad, U. P. & Strandsbjerg, J. The Politics of Sustainability in the Arctic: Reconfiguring Identity, Space, and Time (Routledge, 2018).

  42. Dale, B., Bay-Larsen, I. & Skorstad, B. The Will to Drill—Mining in Arctic Communities (Springer, 2017).

  43. Priebe, J. A modern mine? Greenlandic media coverage on the mining community of Qullissat, western Greenland, 1942–1968. Polar J. 8, 141–162 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mortensen, B. O. G. The quest for resources—the case of Greenland. J. Mil. Strat. Stud. 15, 93–128 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Sandroos, B. The Greenland Mineral Resources Act: The Law and Practice of Oil, Gas and Mining in Greenland (Djøf, 2015).

  46. Greenland’s Mineral Strategy 2020–2024 (Government of Greenland, 2020).

  47. Boertmann, D. Miljo og rastoffer i Gronland (ISD, 2018).

  48. Hino, M., Field, C. B. & Mach, K. J. Managed retreat as a response to natural hazard risk. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 364–370 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Ziegler, A. Political orientation, environmental values, and climate change beliefs and attitudes: an empirical cross country analysis. Energy Econ. 63, 144–153 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Schill, C. et al. A more dynamic understanding of human behaviour for the Anthropocene. Nat. Sustain. 2, 1075–1082 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Hansen, A. M. & Burkins, M. B. Melting and mining in Greenland: understanding Arctic climate change through dialogue with locals. Georget. J. Int. Aff. (2020); https://gjia.georgetown.edu/2020/05/29/greenland-understanding-climatechange-through-localdialogue/

  52. Rosing, M., Knudsen, R., Heinrich, J. & Rasmusen, L. To the Benefit of Greenland (Ilisimatusarfik, University of Greenland, 2014).

  53. Nuclear Engineering International. Greenland plans to reimpose ban on uranium mining. Progressive Media International (22 July 2021).

  54. Tsui, E., Axworthy, T. S. & French, S. Lessons from the Arctic: The Role of Regional Governments in International Affairs (Mosaic, 2020).

  55. Clayton, S. et al. Psychological research and global climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 640–646 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Gravelle, T. B. & Lachapelle, E. Politics, proximity and the pipeline: mapping public attitudes toward Keystone XL. Energy Policy 83, 99–108 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Eisenstadt, T. A. & West, K. J. Indigenous belief systems, science, and resource extraction: climate change attitudes in Ecuador. Glob. Environ. Polit. 17, 40–58 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Beaugrand, G., Edwards, M., Brander, K., Luczak, C. & Ibanez, F. Causes and projections of abrupt climate-driven ecosystem shifts in the North Atlantic. Ecol. Lett. 11, 1157–1168 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Greene, C. H., Pershing, A. J., Cronin, T. M. & Ceci, N. Arctic climate change and its impacts on the ecology of the North Atlantic. Ecology 89, S24–S38 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Manap, N. & Voulvoulis, N. Environmental management for dredging sediments—the requirement of developing nations. J. Environ. Manage. 147, 338–348 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Everett, R. A., Miller, A. W. & Ruiz, G. M. Shifting sands could bring invasive species. Science 359, 878 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Ren, C. B. & Chimirri, D. Arctic Tourism: More Than an Industry? (The Arctic Institute Center for Circumpolar Security Studies, 2018).

  63. Social Impact Assessment (SIA): Guidelines on the Process and Preparation of the SIA Report for Mineral Projects (Government of Greenland, 2016).

  64. Drews, S. & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies. Clim. Policy 16, 855–876 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Hovelsrud, G. K., Poppel, B., van Oort, B. & Reist, J. D. Arctic societies, cultures, and peoples in a changing cryosphere. Ambio 40, 100–110 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Lee, T. M., Markowitz, E. M., Howe, P. D., Ko, C.-Y. & Leiserowitz, A. A. Predictors of public climate change awareness and risk perception around the world. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 1014–1020 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Johnstone, R. L. & Hansen, A. M. Regulation of Extractive Industries: Community Engagement in the Arctic (Routledge, 2020).

  68. State of Green. Greenland joins the Paris Agreement. State of Green (2 November 2021).

  69. Kalvig, P. & Keiding, J. Vurdering af økonomiske- og markedsmæssige muligheder for produktion af sand, grus og sten (aggregater) i Grønland rettet mod bygge- og anlægsindustrierne i Europa og Nordamerika (Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS), 2021).

  70. Kopp, R. E., Hay, C. C., Little, C. M. & Mitrovica, J. X. Geographic variability of sea-level change. Curr. Clim. Change Rep. 1, 192–204 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Kulp, S. A. & Strauss, B. H. New elevation data triple estimates of global vulnerability to sea-level rise and coastal flooding. Nat. Commun. 10, 4844 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys (American Association for Public Opinion Research, 2016).

  73. Leiserowitz, A. Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: the role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change 77, 45–72 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. O’Connor, R. E., Bard, R. J. & Fisher, A. Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change. Risk Anal. 19, 461–471 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Leiserowitz, A. Energy in the American mind, December 2018. OSF https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/BDQ25 (2019).

  76. Lumley, T. Survey: analysis of complex survey samples. R package version 3.35-1 (2020).

  77. Hamilton, L. C., Hartter, J., Lemcke-Stampone, M., Moore, D. W. & Safford, T. G. Tracking public beliefs about anthropogenic climate change. PLoS ONE 10, e0138208 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Bendixen, M., Leander Nielsen, R., Lund Plesner, J. & Minor, K. Replication (code + model output) data for ‘Opportunistic climate adaptation and public support for sand extraction in Greenland’. Harvard Dataverse https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/CQ4CY4 (2022).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Carlsberg Foundation for financial support for the study (grant no. CF-19-0206), awarded to M.B. Furthermore, M.B. acknowledges financial support from the Independent Research Fund Denmark (grant no. 8028-00008B) and the Carlsberg Foundation (grant no. CF20-0129). K.M. acknowledges support from the Danish Agency for Higher Education and Science and the Independent Research Fund Denmark (grant no. 9095-00007A).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.B. and K.M. framed the scope of the manuscript and together with R.L.N. developed the survey questionnaire. K.M. and J.L.P. structured the data. All authors analysed the data, and K.M. produced the graphics. All authors contributed to the writing, editing and revision of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mette Bendixen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Sustainability thanks Lawrence Hamilton, Leneisja Jungsberg and Meg Parsons for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Table 1.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Data 1

Survey questionnaire.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bendixen, M., Nielsen, R.L., Plesner, J.L. et al. Opportunistic climate adaptation and public support for sand extraction in Greenland. Nat Sustain 5, 991–999 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00922-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00922-8

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing