Abstract
Humans have unlimited wants. This foundational economic principle and widely accepted assumption about human nature poses considerable challenges to addressing sustainability because pursuing wealth and economic growth to meet unlimited wants increases resource use and pollution. Here we show evidence that this principle is not universal, and actually applies only to a minority of people. Across 42 community samples (N = 7,860) from 33 countries spanning 6 continents, we examined how much money people wanted in their absolutely ideal life. In 86% of countries the majority of people thought they would achieve their absolutely ideal lives with US$10 million or less, and in some countries as little as US$1 million or less. However, a substantial minority (8–39% across countries) wanted as much money as they could obtain, indicating unlimited wants. Limited and unlimited wealth ideals were not related to country differences in economic development, but those with unlimited wants tended to be younger, city-dwelling people who valued power, success and independence, and lived in countries with a greater collective focus and acceptance of power differences. The results suggest that transformative approaches relying on limiting wealth and growth to achieve sustainability may be more consistent with human ideals and aspirations than commonly believed.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data and materials for the studies used in this paper are publicly available in Open Science Framework repositories at https://osf.io/25398/ (Study 1) and https://osf.io/k3wdp/ (Study 2).
References
Kramm, M. & Robeyns, I. Limits to wealth in the history of Western philosophy. Eur. J. Philos. 28, 954–969 (2020).
Wiedmann, T., Lenzen, M., Keysser, L. T. & Steinberger, J. K. Scientists’ warning on affluence. Nat. Commun. 11, 3107 (2020).
Haberl, H. et al. A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 065003 (2020).
Wiedmann, T. O. et al. The material footprint of nations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 6271–6276 (2015).
Jackson, T. & Victor, P. A. Unraveling the claims for (and against) green growth. Science 366, 950–951 (2019).
Cohen, D. The Infinite Desire for Growth (Princeton Univ. Press, 2018).
Lea, S. E. G. & Webley, P. Money as tool, money as drug: the biological psychology of a strong incentive. Behav. Brain Sci. 29, 161–209 (2006).
Keynes, J. M. The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes: Essays in Persuasion Vol. 9 (Palgrave Macmillan, 1972).
Vohs, K. D., Mead, N. L. & Goode, M. R. The psychological consequences of money. Science 314, 1154–1156 (2006).
Dunn, E. W., Aknin, L. B. & Norton, M. I. Spending money on others promotes happiness. Science 319, 1687–1688 (2008).
Herrnstein, R. J. Rational choice theory: necessary but not sufficient. Am. Psychol. 45, 356–367 (1990).
Davies, W. Experience: I’ve had the same supper for 10 years. The Guardian (16 April 2021).
Hornsey, M. J. et al. How much is enough in a perfect world? Cultural variation in ideal levels of happiness, pleasure, freedom, health, self-esteem, longevity, and intelligence. Psychol. Sci. 29, 1393–1404 (2018).
Bain, P. G., Kashima, Y. & Haslam, N. Conceptual beliefs about human values and their implications: human nature beliefs predict value importance, value trade-offs, and responses to value-laden rhetoric. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 91, 351–367 (2006).
Killingsworth, M. A. Experienced well-being rises with income, even above $75,000 per year. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2016976118 (2021).
Jebb, A. T., Tay, L., Diener, E. & Oishi, S. Happiness, income satiation and turning points around the world. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2, 33–38 (2018).
Kahneman, D. & Deaton, A. High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 16489–16493 (2010).
Oishi, S., Diener, E. & Lucas, R. E. The optimum level of well-being: can people be too happy? Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2, 346–360 (2007).
Scheibehenne, B., Greifeneder, R. & Todd, PeterM. Can there ever be too many options? A meta-analytic review of choice overload. J. Consum. Res. 37, 409–425 (2010).
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J. & Minkov, M. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (McGraw-Hill, 2010).
Kilbourne, W. E. et al. The institutional foundations of materialism in western societies: a conceptualization and empirical test. J. Macromarketing 29, 259–278 (2009).
Schwartz, S. H. et al. Refining the theory of basic individual values. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 103, 663–688 (2012).
Epstein, J. Manhattan rents soar more than 25% across most neighborhoods, Bloomberg https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/property-prices/nyc/ (2022).
Land Registry, Average house prices by borough, ward, MSOA & LSOA, London Datastore https://data.london.gov.uk/dataset/average-house-prices (2022).
Mishel, L. & Wolfe, J. CEO compensation has grown 940% since 1978 (Economic Policy Institute, 2019).
Aristotle. The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nichomachean Ethics (Penguin, 1967).
Simon, H. A. Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychol. Rev. 63, 129–138 (1956).
Cheng, J. T. & Tracy, J. L. The impact of wealth on prestige and dominance rank relationships. Psychol. Inq. 24, 102–108 (2013).
Garrett, T. A. An international comparison and analysis of lotteries and the distribution of lottery expenditures. Int. Rev. Appl. Econ. 15, 213–227 (2001).
Sheldon, K. M. & Lyubomirsky, S. The challenge of staying happier: testing the Hedonic Adaptation Prevention model. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 38, 670–680 (2012).
Wilson, T. D. & Gilbert, D. T. Affective forecasting: knowing what to want. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 14, 131–134 (2005).
Miller, D. T. & McFarland, C. Pluralistic ignorance: when similarity is interpreted as dissimilarity. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 53, 298–305 (1987).
Díaz, S. et al. Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax3100 (2019).
Sachs, J. D. et al. Six transformations to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Nat. Sustain. 2, 805–814 (2019).
Jackson, T. Prosperity without Growth: Foundations for the Economy of Tomorrow (Routledge, 2017).
Victor, P. Questioning economic growth. Nature 468, 370–371 (2010).
Raworth, K. Doughnut Economics (Random House, 2017).
Scheuer, F. & Slemrod, J. Taxation and the superrich. Annu. Rev. Econ. 12, 189–211 (2020).
Warren, Jayapal, Boyle introduce ultra-millionaire tax on fortunes over $50 million (Senator Elizabeth Warren, 2021); https://www.warren.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/warren-jayapal-boyle-introduce-ultra-millionaire-tax-on-fortunes-over-50-million
Inglehart, R. & Baker, W. E. Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. Am. Sociol. Rev. 65, 19–51 (2000).
Schwartz, S. H. in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Vol. 25 (ed. Zanna, M. P.) 1–65 (Academic, 1992).
Schwartz, S. H. et al. Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 32, 519–542 (2001).
Lindeman, M. & Verkasalo, M. Measuring values with the Short Schwartz’s Value Survey. J. Pers. Assess. 85, 170–178 (2005).
Sandy, C. J., Gosling, S. D., Schwartz, S. H. & Koelkebeck, T. The development and validation of brief and ultrabrief measures of values. J. Pers. Assess. 99, 545–555 (2017).
Acknowledgements
This research was supported in part by a grant from the Australian Research Council (DP180100294, P.G.B.). We thank E. Bushina, C. Calligaro, C. Demarque, Y. Guan, L.-O. Johannson, T. Milfont and J. Park for translations. C. Crimston, M. Hornsey, T. Milfont and C. Chapman contributed to survey administration. We thank M. Fonseca and K. Papps for comments on earlier versions of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
P.G.B. and R.B. were responsible for the conceptualization, methodology and formal analysis of this work. Writing of the original draft was done by P.G.B., with the reviewing and editing carried out by R.B. The funding acquisition was performed by P.G.B.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Sustainability thanks Travis Carter, Therese Lindahl and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Sections 1–6 and Tables 1–13.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bain, P.G., Bongiorno, R. Evidence from 33 countries challenges the assumption of unlimited wants. Nat Sustain 5, 669–673 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00902-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00902-y
This article is cited by
-
Limited and unlimited wants examined
Nature Sustainability (2022)