Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Recent expansion of oil palm plantations into carbon-rich forests

An Author Correction to this article was published on 22 April 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Deforestation arising from oil palm expansion in the tropics poses threats to forest ecosystem services. Using high-resolution satellite maps, we show that oil palm expansion into forests in Indonesia and Malaysia during 2001–2015 caused a forest biomass loss of 50.2 ± 21.9 TgC yr−1. Large-scale plantations dominated the expansion area. But the encroachment of oil palm plantations from low to high biomass density forests is particularly obvious for small-scale plantations after 2007. This work provides new data for targeting policies to restrict oil palm encroachment into carbon-rich regions, including into protected areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Forest biomass loss caused by oil palm conversion.
Fig. 2: Forest biomass loss caused by oil palm expansion in the protected areas (PAs) and relationship between forest biomass loss per area and palm oil export price in the whole study region.

Data availability

The AOPD and tree cover loss data can be accessed from https://zenodo.org/record/3467071#.YRHtYKgzaCg (see also ref. 1) and from https://storage.googleapis.com/earthenginepartners-hansen/GFC-2020-v1.8/download.html (see also ref. 5), respectively. The GlobBiomass2010 and CCI-Biomass2017 data are available at https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.894711 (see also ref. 6) and at https://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/bedc59f37c9545c981a839eb552e408416. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

The codes which support the main findings of this study are available via https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6299969.

Change history

References

  1. Xu, Y. et al. Annual oil palm plantation maps in Malaysia and Indonesia from 2001 to 2016. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 12, 847–867 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Meijaard, E. et al. The environmental impacts of palm oil in context. Nat. Plants 6, 1418–1426 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Guillaume, T. et al. Carbon costs and benefits of Indonesian rainforest conversion to plantations. Nat. Commun. 9, 2388 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ordway, E. M. & Asner, G. P. Carbon declines along tropical forest edges correspond to heterogeneous effects on canopy structure and function. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 7863–7870 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hansen, M. C. et al. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342, 850 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Santoro, M. et al. The global forest above-ground biomass pool for 2010 estimated from high-resolution satellite observations. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 13, 3927–3950 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) (UNEP-WCMC and IUCN, accessed 12 February 2020); www.protectedplanet.net

  8. Mahmud, A., Rehrig, M. & Hills, G. Improving the Livelihoods of Palm Oil Smallholders: The Role of the Private Sector (FSG, 2010).

  9. Lasco, R. Forest carbon budgets in Southeast Asia following harvesting and land cover change. Sci. China 45, 55–64 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Historical Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Climate Watch, accessed 6 October 2021); https://www.climatewatchdata.org/

  11. Euler, M., Schwarze, S., Siregar, H. & Qaim, M. Oil palm expansion among smallholder farmers in Sumatra, Indonesia. J. Agric. Econ. 67, 658–676 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Donofrio, S., Rothrock, P. & Leonard, J. J. F. T. Supply Change: Tracking Corporate Commitments to Deforestation-free SupplyChains, 2017 (Forest Trends, 2017).

  13. Rist, L., Feintrenie, L. & Levang, P. The livelihood impacts of oil palm: smallholders in Indonesia. Biodivers. Conserv. 19, 1009–1024 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Saadun, N. et al. Socio-ecological perspectives of engaging smallholders in environmental-friendly palm oil certification schemes. Land Use Policy 72, 333–340 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hansen, M. C., Stehman, S. V. & Potapov, P. V. Quantification of global gross forest cover loss. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 8650 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Santoro, M. & Cartus, O. ESA Biomass Climate Change Initiative (Biomass_cci): Global datasets of forest above-ground biomass for the year 2017 v.1 (Centre for Environmental Data Analysis, 2019); https://doi.org/10.5285/bedc59f37c9545c981a839eb552e4084

  17. Busch, J. et al. Reductions in emissions from deforestation from Indonesia’s moratorium on new oil palm, timber, and logging concessions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 1328–1333 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. McGarigal, K., Cushman, S. A. & Ene, E. FRAGSTATS v.4: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical and continuous maps (Univ. Massachusetts, 2012).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant nos. 2017YFA0604401 and 2019YFA0606604), Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program (2021Z11GHX002) and the National Key Scientific and Technological Infrastructure project ‘Earth System Science Numerical Simulator Facility’ (EarthLab). The global AGB dataset was generated as part of the European Space Agency (ESA) Data User Element (DUE) GlobBiomass project (ESRIN contract no. 4000113100/14/I-NB).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

L.Y., P.C. and W.L. designed the project. Y.X. collected and processed the data and constructed the figures and tables. Y.X., L.Y., P.C. W.L., M.S., H.Y. and P.G. contributed to writing, reviewing and editing the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Le Yu or Wei Li.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Sustainability thanks Wan Yee Lam, Jing Zhao and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Oil palm-induced land-use change carbon budget in Peninsular Malaysia, Sumatra and Borneo during 2001–2015.

The black dots and lines represent the net carbon loss and the 1-σ uncertainty range for each island obtained by summing up all the component carbon fluxes and the corresponding uncertainties.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 Contribution of the biomass carbon loss increase in Period 2 (2008–2015) by province.

Change of carbon loss is calculated as the difference of cumulative carbon loss for the forest area encroached on by oil palm in the two periods. Change of carbon density for converted forest is the difference of average carbon density of oil palm expansion occupied forest by each province in two periods.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3

The proportion of forest biomass loss caused by different patch sizes of oil palm expansion during 2001–2015.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4 Example of oil palm plantation identification and expansion from small to large patches by patch growth and combination in Melaka, Malaysia.

Different colours represent different patches. During 2003 to 2009, oil palm patch#1 continues to expand and merge with other patches (for example patch#2 and patch#3).

Source data

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Text 1–4, Figs. 1–15 and Tables 1–4.

Reporting Summary

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

The statistical source data to produce Fig. 1a,c,d. The source data of Fig. 1b are beyond the size limitations (>30 MB) so that it is explained in the sheet (1b) and uploaded in the zenodo repository (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6299969).

Source Data Fig. 2

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 1

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 2

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 3

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 4

Statistical source data.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, Y., Yu, L., Ciais, P. et al. Recent expansion of oil palm plantations into carbon-rich forests. Nat Sustain 5, 574–577 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00872-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00872-1

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing