Integrated assessment models are widely used to assess climate change mitigation strategies. Comparing scenarios from several integrated assessment models, a study now highlights the benefits and trade-offs of near-term mitigation to reduce mitigation challenges in the longer term.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 per month
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Get just this article for as long as you need it
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Hasegawa, T. et al. Nat. Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00772-w (2021).
Grubler, A. et al. Nat. Energy 3, 515–527 (2018).
van Vuuren, D. P. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 391–397 (2018).
Calvin, K. et al. GCB Bioenergy 13, 1346–1371 (2021).
Churkina, G. et al. Nat. Sustain. 3, 269–276 (2020).
Englund, O. et al. WIREs Energy Environ. 9, e375 (2020).
Cacho, J. F., Negri, M. C., Zumpf, C. R. & Campbell, P. WIREs Energy Environ. 7, e275 (2017).
Smith, P. et al. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 1532–1575 (2020).
Herrick, J. E. et al. Land Restoration for Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals: An International Resource Panel Think Piece (United Nations Environment Programme, 2019); https://www.resourcepanel.org/reports/land-restoration-achieving-sustainable-development-goals
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Berndes, G., Cowie, A. Land sector impacts of early climate action. Nat Sustain 4, 1021–1022 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00777-5