Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

You are viewing this page in draft mode.

Upward expansion and acceleration of forest clearance in the mountains of Southeast Asia


Southeast Asia contains about half of all tropical mountain forests, which are rich in biodiversity and carbon stocks, yet there is debate as to whether regional mountain forest cover has increased or decreased in recent decades. Here, our analysis of high-resolution satellite datasets reveals increasing mountain forest loss across Southeast Asia. Total mean annual forest loss was 3.22 Mha yr−1 during 2001–2019, with 31% occurring on the mountains. In the 2010s, the frontier of forest loss moved to higher elevations (15.1 ± 3.8 m yr−1 during 2011–2019, P < 0.01) and steeper slopes (0.22 ± 0.05° yr−1 during 2009–2019, P < 0.01) that have high forest carbon density relative to the lowlands. These shifts led to unprecedented annual forest carbon loss of 424 Tg C yr−1, accelerating at a rate of 18 ± 4 Tg C yr−2 (P < 0.01) from 2001 to 2019. Our results underscore the immediate threat of carbon stock losses associated with accelerating forest clearance in Southeast Asian mountains, which jeopardizes international climate agreements and biodiversity conservation.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Time series of forest-loss area and associated topography across SEA during the period 2001–2019.
Fig. 2: Trends in mean elevation and slope of lands incurring forest loss following the IPs.
Fig. 3: Time series of forest carbon loss and associated topography across SEA during the period 2001–2019.
Fig. 4: Spatial patterns of forest carbon loss across SEA during the period 2001–2019.

Data availability

The global maps of forest-cover loss and gain are available at The ASTER elevation data are available at The GMBA inventory is available at The aboveground biomass maps are available at The primary extent data are available at All datasets are also available upon request from the corresponding author.

Code availability

The scripts used to generate all the results are MATLAB (R2020a). Analysis scripts are available at


  1. Bonan, G. B. Forests and climate change: forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science 320, 1444–1449 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Saatchi, S. S. et al. Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 9899–9904 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Veldkamp, E., Schmidt, M., Powers, J. S. & Corre, M. D. Deforestation and reforestation impacts on soils in the tropics. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 1, 590–605 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ceccherini, G. et al. Abrupt increase in harvested forest area over Europe after 2015. Nature 583, 72–77 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mitchard, E. T. A. The tropical forest carbon cycle and climate change. Nature 559, 527–534 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Curran, L. M. et al. Lowland forest loss in protected areas of Indonesian Borneo. Science 303, 1000–1003 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Friedl, A. et al. MODIS Collection 5 Global Land Cover: Algorithm Refinements and Characterization of New Datasets, 2001–2012 Collection 5.1 (Boston University, 2010).

  8. Hansen, M. C. et al. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342, 850–853 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Margono, B. A., Potapov, P. V., Turubanova, S., Stolle, F. & Hansen, M. C. Primary forest cover loss in Indonesia over 2000–2012. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 730–735 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Turubanova, S. et al. Ongoing primary forest loss in Brazil, Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Indonesia. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 074028 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Searchinger, T. et al. Creating a Sustainable Food Future: A Menu of Solutions to Feed Nearly 10 Billion People by 2050 (World Resources Institute, 2019).

  12. Gibbs, H. K. et al. Tropical forests were the primary sources of new agricultural land in the 1980s and 1990s. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 16732–16737 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tyukavina, A. et al. Congo Basin forest loss dominated by increasing smallholder clearing. Sci. Adv. 4, eaat2993 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Achard, F. et al. Determination of tropical deforestation rates and related carbon losses from 1990 to 2010. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 2540–2554 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Baccini, A. et al. Tropical forests are a net carbon source based on aboveground measurements of gain and loss. Science 358, 230–234 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Aide, T. M. et al. Woody vegetation dynamics in the tropical and subtropical Andes from 2001 to 2014: satellite image interpretation and expert validation. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 2112–2126 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Song, X. P. et al. Global land change from 1982 to 2016. Nature 560, 639–643 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Körner, C. et al. A global inventory of mountains for bio-geographical applications. Alp. Bot. 127, 1–15 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zeng, Z. et al. Highland cropland expansion and forest loss in Southeast Asia in the twenty-first century. Nat. Geosci. 11, 556–562 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zeng, Z., Gower, D. B. & Wood, E. F. Accelerating forest loss in Southeast Asian Massif in the 21st century: a case study in Nan Province, Thailand. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 4682–4695 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zarin, D. J. et al. Can carbon emissions from tropical deforestation drop by 50% in 5 years? Glob. Change Biol. 22, 1336–1347 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Spracklen, D. & Righelato, R. Tropical montane forests are a larger than expected global carbon store. Biogeosciences 11, 2741–2754 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Miettinen, J., Shi, C. & Liew, S. C. Deforestation rates in insular Southeast Asia between 2000 and 2010. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 2261–2270 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Austin, K. G. et al. What causes deforestation in Indonesia? Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 024007 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hansen, M. et al. Response to comment on ‘high-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change’. Science 344, 981–981 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chan, N., Xayvongsa, L. & Takeda, S. in Environmental Resources Use and Challenges in Contemporary Southeast Asia (eds Lopez, M. I. & Suryomenggolo, J.) 231–246 (Springer, 2018).

  27. Thompson, J. R., Carpenter, D. N., Cogbill, C. V. & Foster, D. R. Four centuries of change in northeastern United States forests. PLoS ONE 8, e72540 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lawrence, D. & Vandecar, K. Effects of tropical deforestation on climate and agriculture. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 27–36 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zeng, Z. et al. Deforestation-induced warming over tropical mountain regions regulated by elevation. Nat. Geosci. 14, 23–29 (2021).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Senior, R. A., Hill, J. K., Benedick, S. & Edwards, D. P. Tropical forests are thermally buffered despite intensive selective logging. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 1267–1278 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Senior, R. A., Hill, J. K., González del Pliego, P., Goode, L. K. & Edwards, D. P. A pantropical analysis of the impacts of forest degradation and conversion on local temperature. Ecol. Evol. 7, 7897–7908 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sodhi, N. S. et al. The state and conservation of Southeast Asian biodiversity. Biodivers. Conserv. 19, 317–328 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ahrends, A. et al. Current trends of rubber plantation expansion may threaten biodiversity and livelihoods. Glob. Environ. Change 34, 48–58 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Edwards, D. P. et al. Degraded lands worth protecting: the biological importance of Southeast Asia’s repeatedly logged forests. Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 82–90 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Srinivasan, U., Elsen, P. R. & Wilcove, D. S. Annual temperature variation influences the vulnerability of montane bird communities to land-use change. Ecography 42, 2084–2094 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rahbek, C. et al. Humboldt’s enigma: what causes global patterns of mountain biodiversity? Science 365, 1108–1113 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Guo, F., Lenoir, J. & Bonebrake, T. C. Land-use change interacts with climate to determine elevational species redistribution. Nat. Commun. 9, 1315 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Elsen, P. R., Monahan, W. B. & Merenlender, A. M. Topography and human pressure in mountain ranges alter expected species responses to climate change. Nat. Commun. 11, 1974 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Spracklen, D. V., Arnold, S. R. & Taylor, C. M. Observations of increased tropical rainfall preceded by air passage over forests. Nature 489, 282–285 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Spracklen, D. V. & Garcia-Carreras, L. The impact of Amazonian deforestation on Amazon Basin rainfall. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 9546–9552 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Cheng, L. et al. Quantifying the impacts of vegetation changes on catchment storage–discharge dynamics using paired-catchment data. Water Resour. Res. 53, 5963–5979 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Chappell, A., Baldock, J. & Sanderman, J. The global significance of omitting soil erosion from soil organic carbon cycling schemes. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 187–191 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Yue, Y. et al. Lateral transport of soil carbon and land–atmosphere CO2 flux induced by water erosion in China. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 6617–6622 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Ziegler, A. D. et al. Carbon outcomes of major land-cover transitions in SE Asia: great uncertainties and REDD+ policy implications. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 3087–3099 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Brinck, K. et al. High resolution analysis of tropical forest fragmentation and its impact on the global carbon cycle. Nat. Commun. 8, 14855 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Fox, J., Castella, J. C. & Ziegler, A. D. Swidden, rubber and carbon: can REDD+ work for people and the environment in montane mainland Southeast Asia? Glob. Environ. Change 29, 318–326 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Harris, N. L. et al. Global maps of twenty-first century forest carbon fluxes. Nat. Clim. Change (2021).

  48. Tachikawa, T., Hato, M., Kaku, M. & Iwasaki, A. Characteristics of ASTER GDEM version 2. In Proc. IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) 3657–3660 (IEEE, 2011).

  49. Burrough, P. A., McDonnell, R., McDonnell, R. A. & Lloyd, C. D. Principles of Geographical Information Systems (Oxford Univ. Press, 2015).

  50. Mokany, K., Raison, R. J. & Prokushkin, A. S. Critical analysis of root : shoot ratios in terrestrial biomes. Glob. Change Biol. 12, 84–96 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Tyukavina, A. et al. Aboveground carbon loss in natural and managed tropical forests from 2000 to 2012. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 074002 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Ryan, S. E. & Porth, L. S. A Tutorial on the Piecewise Regression Approach Applied to Bedload Transport Data (CreateSpace, 2015).

  53. Toms, J. D. & Lesperance, M. L. Piecewise regression: a tool for identifying ecological thresholds. Ecology 84, 2034–2041 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Zeng, Z. et al. A reversal in global terrestrial stilling and its implications for wind energy production. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 979–985 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Zaiontz, C. Real Statistics Using Excel (accessed 16 June 2021);

Download references


Z.Z. and C.Z. were supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 42071022, 41861124003 and 41890852). Z.Z. was also supported by the start-up fund provided by Southern University of Science and Technology (no. 29/Y01296122). We thank Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA for providing the high-resolution forest change and primary forest extent data; NASA and Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry for providing the elevation data; Körner for providing the GMBA inventory; and Zarin/WHRC for providing the aboveground biomass density maps.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Z.Z. designed the research; Y.F. performed the analysis; Y.F. and A.D.Z. wrote the draft. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the results and the writing of the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhenzhong Zeng.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Sustainability thanks Stephen Leisz, Ensheng Weng, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–6.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feng, Y., Ziegler, A.D., Elsen, P.R. et al. Upward expansion and acceleration of forest clearance in the mountains of Southeast Asia. Nat Sustain 4, 892–899 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing