Historic storms and the hidden value of coastal wetlands for nature-based flood defence

Abstract

Global change amplifies coastal flood risks and motivates a paradigm shift towards nature-based coastal defence, where engineered structures are supplemented with coastal wetlands such as saltmarshes. Although experiments and models indicate that such natural defences can attenuate storm waves, there is still limited field evidence on how much they add safety to engineered structures during severe storms. Using well-documented historic data from the 1717 and 1953 flood disasters in Northwest Europe, we show that saltmarshes can reduce both the chance and impact of the breaching of engineered defences. Historic lessons also reveal a key but unrecognized natural flood defence mechanism: saltmarshes lower flood magnitude by confining breach size when engineered defences have failed, which is shown to be highly effective even with long-term sea level rise. These findings provide new insights into the mechanisms and benefits of nature-based mitigation of flood hazards, and should stimulate the development of novel safety designs that smartly harness different natural coastal defence functions.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Analysis of dyke breach records during the 1717 Christmas flood.
Fig. 2: Maps of the Wadden Sea coast in the region considered in this study.
Fig. 3: Recent storm observations for a wave-exposed marsh in the Wadden Sea.
Fig. 4: Analysis of dyke breach records from the 1953 North Sea flood.
Fig. 5: Relative advantage of saltmarsh foreshores over tidal flats in reducing flood impact under sea level rise.
Fig. 6: An example of steps to implement novel nature-based flood protection with marshes between double dykes.

Data availability

The collected wave data for the two present-day storms are available on figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6011129.v2). Other data that support the findings of this study are available within the paper and its supplementary information files.

Code availability

The Matlab scripts for calculating breach discharge and the expected fatality rate in the flooded area are available on figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6010958).

References

  1. 1.

    Barbier, E. B. A global strategy for protecting vulnerable coastal populations. Science 345, 1250–1251 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Hallegatte, S., Green, C., Nicholls, R. J. & Corfee-Morlot, J. Future flood losses in major coastal cities. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 802–806 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Blake E. S., Rappaport E. N. and Landsea C. W. The Deadliest, Costliest, and Most Intense United States Tropical Cyclones from 1851 to 2006 (and other frequently requested hurricane facts) (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/National Weather Service, National Centers for Environmental Prediction, National Hurricane Center, 2007).

  4. 4.

    Nakamura, R., Shibayama, T., Esteban, M. & Iwamoto, T. Future typhoon and storm surges under different global warming scenarios: case study of typhoon Haiyan (2013). Nat. Hazards 82, 1645–1681 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Rijkswaterstaat & KNMI Verslag over de Stormvloed van 1953 (Staatsdrukkerij, 1961).

  6. 6.

    Gerritsen, H. What happened in 1953? The Big Flood in the Netherlands in retrospect. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 363, 1271–1291 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Jakubowski-Tiessen, M. Sturmflut 1717: die Bewältigung einer Naturkatastrophe in der frühen Neuzeit (Oldenbourg, 1992).

  8. 8.

    Lamb, H. & Frydendahl, K. Historic Storms of the North Sea, British Isles and Northwest Europe (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1991).

  9. 9.

    Wahl, T. et al. Understanding extreme sea levels for broad-scale coastal impact and adaptation analysis. Nat. Commun. 8, 16075 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    IPCC Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (WMO, 2018).

  11. 11.

    Syvitski, J. P. M. et al. Sinking deltas due to human activities. Nat. Geosci. 2, 681–686 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Neumann, B., Vafeidis, A. T., Zimmermann, J. & Nicholls, R. J. Future coastal population growth and exposure to sea-level rise and coastal flooding - a global assessment. PLoS ONE 10, e0118571 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Cheong, S.-M. et al. Coastal adaptation with ecological engineering. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 787–791 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Temmerman, S. et al. Ecosystem-based coastal defence in the face of global change. Nature 504, 79–83 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Temmerman, S. & Kirwan, M. L. Building land with a rising sea. Science 349, 588–589 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Vuik, V., Jonkman, S. N., Borsje, B. W. & Suzuki, T. Nature-based flood protection: the efficiency of vegetated foreshores for reducing wave loads on coastal dikes. Coast. Eng. 116, 42–56 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Barbier, E. B. et al. The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecol. Monogr. 81, 169–193 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kirwan, M. L., Temmerman, S., Skeehan, E. E., Guntenspergen, G. R. & Fagherazzi, S. Overestimation of marsh vulnerability to sea level rise. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 253–260 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Kirwan, M. L. & Megonigal, J. P. Tidal wetland stability in the face of human impacts and sea-level rise. Nature 504, 53–60 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Moller, I. et al. Wave attenuation over coastal salt marshes under storm surge conditions. Nat. Geosci. 7, 727–731 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Arkema, K. K. et al. Coastal habitats shield people and property from sea-level rise and storms. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 913–918 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Narayan, S. et al. The value of coastal wetlands for flood damage reduction in the northeastern USA. Sci. Rep. 7, 9463 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Visser, P. J. Breach Growth in Sand-Dikes. PhD thesis, Delft Univ. Technology (1998).

  24. 24.

    Bouma, T. J. et al. Identifying knowledge gaps hampering application of intertidal habitats in coastal protection: opportunities & steps to take. Coast. Eng. 87, 147–157 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Seeratt, T. V. Journaal van de Commies Provinciaal Thomas van Seeratt Betref de Dijken over de Jaren 1716–1721 Archive no. 818 (Groninger Archives, 1730).

  26. 26.

    Willemsen, P. W., Borsje, B. W., Vuik, V., Bouma, T. J. & Hulscher, S. J. Field-based decadal wave attenuating capacity of combined tidal flats and salt marshes. Coast. Eng. 156, 103628 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Spencer, T. et al. Salt marsh surface survives true-to-scale simulated storm surges. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 41, 543–552 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Jonkman, S. N., Bočkarjova, M., Kok, M. & Bernardini, P. Integrated hydrodynamic and economic modelling of flood damage in the Netherlands. Ecol. Econ. 66, 77–90 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Auerbach, L. W. et al. Flood risk of natural and embanked landscapes on the Ganges–Brahmaputra tidal delta plain. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 153–157 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Minderhoud, P. S. J., Coumou, L., Erkens, G., Middelkoop, H. & Stouthamer, E. Mekong delta much lower than previously assumed in sea-level rise impact assessments. Nat. Commun. 10, 3847 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Van Coppenolle, R., Schwarz, C. & Temmerman, S. Contribution of mangroves and salt marshes to nature-based mitigation of coastal flood risks in major deltas of the world. Estuar. Coast. 41, 1699–1711 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Van Coppenolle, R. & Temmerman, S. A global exploration of tidal wetland creation for nature-based flood risk mitigation in coastal cities. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 226, 106262 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Vuik, V., van Vuren, S., Borsje, B. W., van Wesenbeeck, B. K. & Jonkman, S. N. Assessing safety of nature-based flood defenses: dealing with extremes and uncertainties. Coast. Eng. 139, 47–64 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Schuerch, M., Spencer, T. & Evans, B. Coupling between tidal mudflats and salt marshes affects marsh morphology. Mar. Geol. 412, 95–106 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Wiberg, P. L., Fagherazzi, S. & Kirwan, M. L. Improving predictions of salt marsh evolution through better integration of data and models. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 12, 389–413 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Leonardi, N., Ganju, N. K. & Fagherazzi, S. A linear relationship between wave power and erosion determines salt-marsh resilience to violent storms and hurricanes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 64–68 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Mariotti, G. & Fagherazzi, S. A numerical model for the coupled long-term evolution of salt marshes and tidal flats. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 115, F01004 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Ladd, C. J., Duggan-Edwards, M. F., Bouma, T. J., Pagès, J. F. & Skov, M. W. Sediment supply explains long-term and large-scale patterns in salt marsh lateral expansion and erosion. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 11178–11187 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Friess, D. A. et al. Are all intertidal wetlands naturally created equal? Bottlenecks, thresholds and knowledge gaps to mangrove and saltmarsh ecosystems. Biol. Rev. 87, 346–366 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Vandenbruwaene, W. et al. Sedimentation and response to sea-level rise of a restored marsh with reduced tidal exchange: comparison with a natural tidal marsh. Geomorphology 130, 115–126 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Jongepier, I., Soens, T., Temmerman, S. & Missiaen, T. Assessing the planimetric accuracy of historical maps (sixteenth to nineteenth centuries): new methods and potential for coastal landscape reconstruction. Cartogr. J. 53, 114–132 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Groeneweg, J. et al. Wave modelling in a tidal inlet: performance of SWAN in the Wadden Sea. In Coastal Engineering 2008: Proc. 31st International Conference on Coastal Engineering (ed. Smith, J. M.) 411–423 (World Scientific, 2009).

  43. 43.

    Groeneweg, J., Beckers, J. & Gautier, C. A probabilistic model for the determination of hydraulic boundary conditions in a dynamic coastal system. In Coastal Engineering 2010: Proc. 32nd International Conference on Coastal Engineering (eds Smith, J. M. & Lynett, P.) (ICEE, 2011).

  44. 44.

    Booij, N., Ris, R. & Holthuijsen, L. H. A third‐generation wave model for coastal regions: 1. model description and validation. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 104, 7649–7666 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Niemeyer, H. D., Kaiser, R. & Berkenbrink, C. Increased overtopping security of dykes: a potential for compensating future impacts of climate change. In Coastal Engineering 2010: Proc. 32nd International Conference on Coastal Engineering (eds Smith, J. M. & Lynett, P.) (ICEE, 2011).

  46. 46.

    Grüne, J. Evaluation of wave climate parameters from benchmarking flotsam levels. In Proc. International Conference on Coastlines, Structures and Breakwaters (ed. Allsop, N. W. H.) 468–477 (Thomas Telford Publishing, 2005).

  47. 47.

    Jonkman, S. N. Loss of Life Estimation in Flood Risk Assessment: Theory and Applications. PhD thesis, Delft Univ. Technology (2007).

  48. 48.

    Jonkman, S. N., Vrijling, J. K. & Vrouwenvelder, A. C. W. M. Methods for the estimation of loss of life due to floods: a literature review and a proposal for a new method. Nat. Hazards 46, 353–389 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    IPCC Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

  50. 50.

    Shapiro, S. S. & Wilk, M. B. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52, 591–611 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank I. Kratzer and J. de Smit for their help in the field. We also thank A. Wielemaker for GIS support and Q. Zhu for the assistance in polishing the figures. This work is part of the research programme BESAFE, financed by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO). Additional financial support has been provided by Deltares, Boskalis, Van Oord, Rijkswaterstaat, World Wildlife Fund, HZ University of Applied Science and ARK Natuurontwikkeling. Z.Z. was also supported by the project funded by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2019M652825) and the Key Special Project for Introduced Talents Team of the Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou; GML2019ZD0403).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Z.Z., V.V., S.T. and T.J.B. conceived the idea for the paper and wrote the initial draft. Z.Z., V.V., T.S., P.J.V. and S.N.J. collected and analysed the data. All authors discussed the results and improved on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhenchang Zhu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–4 and Tables 1–3.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Data

Supplementary Data 1

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, Z., Vuik, V., Visser, P.J. et al. Historic storms and the hidden value of coastal wetlands for nature-based flood defence. Nat Sustain (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0556-z

Download citation