Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Environmental destruction not avoided with the Sustainable Development Goals

Abstract

The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) were designed to reconcile environmental protection with socioeconomic development. Here, we compare SDG indicators to a suite of external measures, showing that while most countries are progressing well towards environmental SDGs, this has little relationship with actual biodiversity conservation, and instead better represents socioeconomic development. If this continues, the SDGs will likely serve as a smokescreen for further environmental destruction throughout the decade.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Many SDG indicators do not adequately reflect changes in external indicators of successful biodiversity conservation.
Fig. 2: Evaluation of the efficacy of environment-related SDG indicators, based on 17 external indicators of the current state of biodiversity and socioeconomic development.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2, and raw data can be provided from the corresponding authors upon request.

Code availability

All R scripts used to process the data are available from the corresponding authors upon request.

References

  1. 1.

    Millennium Development Goals Report (United Nations, 2015).

  2. 2.

    Hansen, M. C. et al. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342, 850–853 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Maxwell, S. L., Fuller, R. A., Brooks, T. M. & Watson, J. E. Biodiversity: the ravages of guns, nets and bulldozers. Nature 536, 143–145 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Griggs, D. et al. Sustainable development goals for people and planet. Nature 495, 305–307 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Elder, M. & Olsen, S. H. The design of environmental priorities in the SDGs. Glob. Policy 10, 70–82 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Stafford-Smith, M. et al. Integration: the key to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustain. Sci. 12, 911–919 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Work of the Statistical Commission Pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Resolution / Adopted by the General Assembly (A/RES/71/313) (United Nations General Assembly, 2017).

  8. 8.

    The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2019 (United Nations, 2019).

  9. 9.

    Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Rreport on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES, 2019).

  10. 10.

    Watson, J. E. M. et al. Protect the last of the wild. Nature 563, 27–30 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Lenton, T. M. et al. Climate tipping points — too risky to bet against. Nature 575, 592–595 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Global Burden of Disease Collaborative Network Global Burden of Disease Study 2015 (GBD 2015) Socio-Demographic Index (SDI) 1980–2015 (Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, 2016).

  13. 13.

    Strengthening the Environmental Dimensions of the Sustainable Development Goals in Asia and the Pacific: Stocktake of National Responses to Sustainable Development Goals 12, 14, and 15 (Asian Development Bank, 2019).

  14. 14.

    Diaz-Sarachaga, J. M., Jato-Espino, D. & Castro-Fresno, D. Is the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) index an adequate framework to measure the progress of the 2030 Agenda? Sustain. Dev. 26, 663–671 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Lenzen, M. et al. International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations. Nature 486, 109–112 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Lim, S. S. et al. Measuring the health-related Sustainable Development Goals in 188 countries: a baseline analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 388, 1813–1850 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Wagstaff, A. et al. Progress on impoverishing health spending in 122 countries: a retrospective observational study. Lancet Glob. Health 6, E180–E192 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Allan, J. R. et al. Hotspots of human impact on threatened terrestrial vertebrates. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000158 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Venter, O. et al. Sixteen years of change in the global terrestrial human footprint and implications for biodiversity conservation. Nat. Commun. 7, 12558 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    R Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2013).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank S. Z. Z. Rahim and D. C. J. Yeo for their contributions towards improving this paper. Y.Z. and L.R.C. acknowledge support from the National Research Foundation (NRF) Singapore under its Commonwealth Research Fellowship grant NRF-CSC-ICFC2017-05.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.Z. and L.R.C. conceived the study. Y.Z. carried out the analyses. Y.Z., S.M., R.K.R., O.V., J.E.M.W. and L.R.C. contributed discussions and modelling insights. Y.Z., S.M., R.K.R., O.V., J.E.M.W. and L.R.C. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yiwen Zeng or L. Roman Carrasco.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–3 and Tables 1 and 2.

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zeng, Y., Maxwell, S., Runting, R.K. et al. Environmental destruction not avoided with the Sustainable Development Goals. Nat Sustain 3, 795–798 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0555-0

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing