Water and wastewater infrastructure worldwide faces unprecedented demand and supply conflicts that require unconventional solutions. In this study, we develop a novel modelling framework to assess the environmental and economic implications of a hybrid water supply system that supplements a centralized surface water supply with distributed direct potable reuse (DPR) of municipal wastewater, as a strategy to address such challenges. The model is tested with real water and wastewater systems data from the City of Houston, Texas. Results show that supplementing the conventional centralized water supply with distributed DPR would reduce water age in the drinking-water distribution network and hence improve water quality; properly designed system configurations attain system-wide net energy savings even with the high energy consumption of existing technologies used for advanced treatment of the wastewater. A target energy efficiency for future advanced treatment technologies is identified to achieve net energy saving with all hybrid system configurations. Furthermore, distributed DPR remains financially competitive compared with other unconventional water supply solutions. The modelling framework and associated databases developed in this study serve an important research need for quantitatively characterizing distributed and hybrid water systems, laying the necessary foundation for rational design of integrated urban water systems.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
The data that support the findings of this study are available from Houston Public Works, but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study and so are not publicly available. Data are, however, available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of Houston Public Works.
The software and custom-developed code for this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Daigger, G. T. Wastewater management in the 21st century. J. Environ. Eng. 133, 671–680 (2007).
Stillwell, A. S. et al. An integrated energy, carbon, water, and economic analysis of reclaimed water use in urban settings: a case study of Austin, Texas. J. Water Reuse Desal. 1, 208–223 (2011).
National Research Council; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Toxicology and Environmental Health Hazards; Commission on Life Sciences; Safe Drinking Water Committee in Drinking Water and Health Vol. 4, Ch. 5 (National Academies Press, 1982); https://doi.org/10.17226/325
Mcallister, T. Developing Guidelines and Standards for Disaster Resilience of the Built Environment: A Research Needs Assessment Technical Note 1795 (NIST, 2013).
Hejazi, M., Edmonds, J., Chaturvedi, V., Davies, E. & Eom, J. Scenarios of global municipal water-use demand projections over the 21st century. Hydrol. Sci. J. 58, 519–538 (2013).
Hanasaki, N. et al. A global water scarcity assessment under Shared Socio-economic Pathways—part 1: water use. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 17, 2375–2391 (2013).
State of the Water Industry Report (AWWA, 2018).
Kavvada, O., Nelson, K. L. & Horvath, A. Spatial optimization for decentralized non-potable water reuse. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 064001 (2018).
Lee, J. & Younos, T. Sustainability strategies at the water–energy nexus: renewable energy and decentralized infrastructure. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 110, 32–39 (2018).
Gikas, P. & Tchobanoglous, G. The role of satellite and decentralized strategies in water resources management. J. Environ. Manag. 90, 144–152 (2009).
Hering, J. G., Waite, T. D., Luthy, R. G., Drewes, J. E. & Sedlak, D. L. A changing framework for urban water systems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 10721–10726 (2013).
National Research Council Water Reuse: Potential for Expanding the Nation’s Water Supply through Reuse of Municipal Wastewater (National Academies Press, 2012).
Gerling, A. Potable Reuse 101: An Innovative and Sustainable Water Supply Solution (American Water Works Association, 2016).
Haarhoff, J. & Van der Merwe, B. Twenty-five years of wastewater reclamation in Windhoek, Namibia. Water Sci. Technol. 33, 25–35 (1996).
Framework for Direct Potable Reuse (Water Reuse Research Foundation, 2015).
McDonald, E. & Nellor, M. H. Final Report: Direct Potable Reuse Resource Document Vol. 1 (Texas Water Development Board, 2015).
Schroeder, E., Tchobanoglous, G., Leverenz, H. L. & Asano, T. Direct Potable Reuse: Supplies, Agriculture, the Environment, and Energy Conservation White Paper (National Water Resesearch Institute, 2012).
Scruggs, C. E., Thomson, B. M. & Asce, M. Opportunities and challenges for direct potable water reuse in arid inland communities. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 143, 04017064 (2017).
Lahnsteiner, J., Van Rensburg, P. & Esterhuizen, J. Direct potable reuse—a feasible water management option. J. Water Reuse Desal. 8, 14–28 (2018).
Zodrow, K. R. et al. Advanced materials, technologies, and complex systems analyses: emerging opportunities to enhance urban water security. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 10274–10281 (2017).
Kavvada, O. et al. Assessing location and scale of urban nonpotable water reuse systems for life-cycle energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 13184–13194 (2016).
Jung, E., Criddle, C. S., Geza, M., Cath, T. Y. & Freyberg, D. L. Decision support toolkit for integrated analysis and design of reclaimed water infrastructure. Water Res. 134, 234–252 (2018).
Machell, J. & Boxall, J. Modeling and field work to investigate the relationship between age and quality of tap water. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 140, 04014020 (2014).
Effects of Water Age on Distribution System Water Quality (EPA, 2002).
Shamsaei, H., Jaafar, O., Ezlin, N. & Basri, A. Effects residence time to water quality in large water distribution systems. Engineering 5, 449–457 (2013).
Running Costs of Wastewater Treatment Plants http://www.costwater.com/runningcostwastewater.htm (CostWater, accessed 5 September 2018).
Running Costs of Water Treatment Plants http://costwater.com/runningcostwater.htm (CostWater, accessed 9 November 2018).
Cost of Desalination for Domestic Water Supply in the MENA Region (World Bank Group, 2016).
What is the average unit cost of desalinated brackish groundwater? Seawater? Texas Water Development Board General FAQs http://www.twdb.texas.gov/innovativewater/desal/faq.asp#title-08 (accessed 1 April 2019).
Guo, T., Englehardt, J. & Wu, T. Review of cost versus scale: water and wastewater treatment and reuse processes. Water Sci. Technol. 69, 223–234 (2014).
City of Houston Electricity Bills http://data.houstontx.gov/dataset/city-of-houston-electricity-bills (Open Data Houston, accessed 6 September 2018).
Najm, I. & Trussell, R. R. in Identifying Future Drinking Water Contaminants (National Research Council; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Commission on Geosciences, Environment and Resources; 1998 Workshop on Emerging Drinking Water Contaminants) 220–243 (National Academies Press, 1999).
Arroyo, J. & Shirazi, S. Cost of Brackish Groundwater Desalination in Texas (Texas Water Development Board, 2012).
Zhao, J. et al. Coordinated restoration of transmission and distribution system using decentralized scheme. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 34, 3428–3442 (2019).
Kargarian, A. et al. Toward distributed/decentralized DC optimal power flow implementation in future electric power systems. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 9, 2574–2594 (2018).
El Paso Water. Advanced purification El Paso Water https://www.epwater.org/our_water/water_planning/advanced_purification (accessed 20 September 2018).
Maseeh, G. P., Russell, C. G., Villalobos, S. L., Balliew, J. E. & Trejo, G. El Paso’s advanced water purification facility: a new direction in potable reuse. J. Am. Water Work. Assoc. 107, 36–45 (2015).
Water Right 5827 (Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, 2011).
Molly, D. Drinking water operations The City of Houston https://www.publicworks.houstontx.gov/pud/drinkingwater.html (accessed 30 August 2018).
US city populations 2018 World Population Review http://worldpopulationreview.com/us-cities/ (accessed 21 September 2018).
2016 Regional Water Plan (Region H Water Planning Group, 2015).
EPANET (EPA, 2008).
EPANET: Application for Modeling Drinking Water Distribution Systems https://www.epa.gov/water-research/epanet (EPA, accessed 28 August 2018).
Eck, B. J. An R package for reading EPANET files. Environ. Model. Softw. 84, 149–154 (2016).
Rossman, L. A. Epanet 2 users manual (US EPA, 2002).
Arandia, E. & Eck, B. J. An R package for EPANET simulations. Environ. Model. Softw. 107, 59–63 (2018).
epanetReader (GitHub, 2018); https://github.com/bradleyjeck/epanetReader
epanet2toolkit (GitHub, 2017); https://github.com/bradleyjeck/epanet2toolkit
We acknowledge funding from the National Science Foundation (award no. CBET-1707117), NSF Nanosystems Engineering Research Center for Nanotechnology-Enabled Water Treatment (ERC-1449500) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 51761125013). Part of the data used in this study was shared by Houston Public Works. The authors thank M. Ramon, P. Pradhan and F. Rabbi from Houston Public Works for data support and valuable technical discussions.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, L., Lopez, E., Dueñas-Osorio, L. et al. The importance of system configuration for distributed direct potable water reuse. Nat Sustain 3, 548–555 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0518-5
Cross-stacked super-aligned carbon nanotube/activated carbon composite electrodes for efficient water purification via capacitive deionization enhanced ultrafiltration
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering (2020)