Wild-capture fisheries help provide food security to billions of people, yet bycatch of non-target species threatens ecosystem health and fishery sustainability. Appropriate monitoring and fisheries management can mitigate bycatch but require standardized bycatch data to be robustly recorded and effectively disseminated. Here we integrated and analysed 30,473 species-specific bycatch records from 95 US fisheries in 2010–2015. We examined patterns in fish and invertebrate, marine mammal, seabird and sea turtle bycatch and developed a standardized scoring system, the relative bycatch index, to assess bycatch performance of each fishery. The estimated amount of fish and invertebrate discards totalled 1.93 million tonnes (4.26 billion pounds) over the 6-year period. We found that the national discard rate is 10.5%, considerably lower than past estimates. Results from our relative bycatch index analysis can be used to facilitate management intervention strategies for particular fisheries or gear types, such as shrimp and otter trawls and several pelagic longline and gillnet fisheries, which had the poorest bycatch performance. These findings underscore the need for continued, high-quality, easily accessible bycatch information to better support fisheries management in the United States and globally.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries Open Access 12 July 2021
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
All the raw NBR data can be explored, queried, visualized and downloaded at: https://ceg.ucsc.edu/projects/nbrexplorer.
All code used to analyse data and generate plots found in the paper is at: https://github.com/mssavoca/NOP_NBR_bycatch_analysis.
Food and Agriculture Organization. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2018 – Meeting the Sustainable Development Goals (FAO, 2018).
Benaka, L. R., Bullock, D., Hoover, A. L. & Olsen, N. A. (eds) US National Bycatch Report First Edition Update 3 (US Department of Commerce, NOAA, 2019).
Davies, R. W. D., Cripps, S. J., Nickson, A. & Porter, G. Defining and estimating global marine fisheries bycatch. Mar. Policy 33, 661–672 (2009).
Pérez-Roda, M. et al. A Third Assessment of Global Marine Fisheries Discards No. 633 (FAO, 2019).
Gilman, E. L. Bycatch governance and best practice mitigation technology in global tuna fisheries. Mar. Policy 35, 590–609 (2011).
Gilman, E. et al. Robbing Peter to pay Paul: replacing unintended cross-taxa conflicts with intentional tradeoffs by moving from piecemeal to integrated fisheries bycatch management. Rev. Fish. Biol. Fish. 29, 93–123 (2019).
Wilcox, C. & Donlon, C. D. Compensatory mitigation as a solution to fisheries bycatch–biodiversity conservation conflicts. Front. Ecol. Environ. 5, 325–331 (2007).
Lewison, R. L., Crowder, L. B., Read, A. J. & Freeman, S. A. Understanding impacts of fisheries bycatch on marine megafauna. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 598–604 (2004).
Lewison, R. L. et al. Global patterns of marine mammal, seabird, and sea turtle bycatch reveal taxa-specific and cumulative megafauna hotspots. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 5271–5276 (2014).
Little, A. S., Needle, C. L., Hilborn, R., Holland, D. S. & Marshall, C. T. Real-time spatial management approaches to reduce bycatch and discards: experiences from Europe and the United States. Fish. Fish. 16, 576–602 (2015).
Senko, J., White, E. R., Heppell, S. S. & Gerber, L. R. Comparing bycatch mitigation strategies for vulnerable marine megafauna. Anim. Conserv. 17, 5–18 (2014).
Eguchi, T., Benson, S. R., Foley, D. G. & Forney, K. A. Predicting overlap between drift gillnet fishing and leatherback turtle habitat in the California current ecosystem. Fish. Oceanogr. 26, 17–33 (2017).
Swimmer, Y. et al. Food color and marine turtle feeding behavior: can blue bait reduce turtle bycatch in commercial fisheries? Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 295, 273–278 (2005).
Shiode, D., Hu, F., Shiga, M., Yokota, K. & Tokai, T. Midwater float system for standardizing hook depths on tuna longlines to reduce sea turtle by-catch. Fish. Sci. 71, 1182–1184 (2005).
Pierre, J. P. & Norden, W. S. Reducing seabird bycatch in longline fisheries using a natural olfactory deterrent. Biol. Conserv. 130, 406–415 (2006).
Swimmer, Y. et al. Sea turtle bycatch mitigation in US longline fisheries. Front. Mar. Sci. 4, 260 (2017).
Melvin, E. F., Guy, T. J. & Read, L. B. Best practice seabird bycatch mitigation for pelagic longline fisheries targeting tuna and related species. Fish. Res. 149, 5–18 (2014).
Alessandro, L. & Antonello, S. An overview of loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) bycatch and technical mitigation measures in the Mediterranean Sea. Rev. Fish. Biol. Fish. 20, 141–161 (2010).
Barlow, J. & Cameron, G. A. Field experiments show that acoustic pingers reduce marine mammal bycatch in the California drift gill net fishery. Mar. Mammal. Sci. 19, 265–283 (2003).
Carretta, J. V., Barlow, J. & Enriquez, L. Acoustic pingers eliminate beaked whale bycatch in a gill net fishery. Mar. Mammal. Sci. 24, 956–961 (2008).
Hobday, A. J., Hartog, J. R., Spillman, C. M. & Alves, O. Seasonal forecasting of tuna habitat for dynamic spatial management. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 68, 898–911 (2011).
Turner, S. M. et al. Cooperative research to evaluate an incidental catch distribution forecast. Front. Mar. Sci. 4, 116 (2017).
Hazen, E. L. et al. A dynamic ocean management tool to reduce bycatch and support sustainable fisheries. Sci. Adv. 4, eaar3001 (2018).
Gilman, E., Passfield, K. & Nakamura, K. Performance of regional fisheries management organizations: ecosystem-based governance of bycatch and discards. Fish. Fish. 15, 327–351 (2014).
Halpern, B. S. et al. Spatial and temporal changes in cumulative human impacts on the world’s ocean. Nat. Commun. 6, 7615 (2015).
Di Minin, E. et al. Identifying global centers of unsustainable commercial harvesting of species. Sci. Adv. 5, eaau2879 (2019).
Harrington, J. M., Myers, R. A. & Rosenberg, A. A. Wasted Resources: Bycatch and discards in US Fisheries (Oceana, 2005).
Brooke, S. G., Desfosse, L. L. & Karp, W. A. Estimating overall fish bycatch in US commercial fisheries. Mar. Fish. Rev. 74, 1–5 (2012).
NOAA/NMFS. Fishery stock status updates. NOAA Fisheries https://go.nature.com/38ZtTIl (2019).
Dulvy, N. K. et al. Extinction risk and conservation of the world’s sharks and rays. eLife 3, e00590 (2014).
Cassoff, R. M. et al. Lethal entanglement in baleen whales. Dis. Aquat. Organ 96, 175–185 (2011).
Wallace, B. P. et al. Global patterns of marine turtle bycatch. Conserv. Lett. 3, 131–142 (2010).
Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation (SAFE) Report for Atlantic Highly Migratory Species (NOAA/NMFS, 2019).
Wallace, B. P., Heppell, S. S., Lewison, R. L., Kelez, S. & Crowder, L. B. Impacts of fisheries bycatch on loggerhead turtles worldwide inferred from reproductive value analyses. J. Appl. Ecol. 45, 1076–1085 (2008).
Bolten, A. B. et al. Quantifying multiple threats to endangered species: an example from loggerhead sea turtles. Front. Ecol. Environ. 9, 295–301 (2011).
Casale, P. & Heppell, S. S. How much sea turtle bycatch is too much? A stationary age distribution model for simulating population abundance and potential biological removal in the Mediterranean. Endanger. Species Res. 29, 239–254 (2016).
Melvin, E. F., Dietrich, K. S., Suryan, R. M. & Fitzgerald, S. M. Lessons from seabird conservation in Alaskan longline fisheries. Conserv. Biol. 33, 842–852 (2019).
Read, A. J., Drinker, P. & Northridge, S. Bycatch of marine mammals in US and global fisheries. Conserv. Biol. 20, 163–169 (2006).
McDonald, S. L., Lewison, R. L. & Read, A. J. Evaluating the efficacy of environmental legislation: a case study from the US marine mammal take reduction planning process. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 5, 1–11 (2016).
Hayes, S. A., Gardner, S., Garrison, L., Henry, A. & Leandro, L. North Atlantic Right Whales – Evaluating Their Recovery Challenges in 2018 (NOAA, 2018).
Lebon, K. M. & Kelly, R. P. Evaluating alternatives to reduce whale entanglements in commercial Dungeness crab fishing gear. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 18, e00608 (2019).
Costello, C. et al. Global fishery prospects under contrasting management regimes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 5125–5129 (2016).
North Pacific Fishery Management Council Pollock Conservation Cooperative and High Seas Catchers’ Cooperative Joint Annual Report 2018 (NPFMC, 2019).
Lewison, R. et al. Dynamic ocean management: identifying the critical ingredients of dynamic approaches to ocean resource management. Bioscience 65, 486–498 (2015).
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Fish and fish product import provisions of the Marine Mammal Protection Act. Fed. Register 81, 1–31 (2016).
Rausser, G., Hamilton, S., Kovach, M. & Stifter, R. Unintended consequences: the spillover effects of common property regulations. Mar. Policy 33, 24–39 (2009).
Zeller, D., Cashion, T., Palomares, M. & Pauly, D. Global marine fisheries discards: a synthesis of reconstructed data. Fish. Fish. 19, 30–39 (2018).
Burgess, M. G., Polasky, S. & Tilman, D. Predicting overfishing and extinction threats in multispecies fisheries. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 15943–15948 (2013).
Burgess, M. G. et al. Protecting marine mammals, turtles, and birds by rebuilding global fisheries. Science 359, 1255–1258 (2018).
Howell, E. A., Kobayashi, D. R., Parker, D. M., Balazs, G. H. & Polovina, J. J. TurtleWatch: a tool to aid in the bycatch reduction of loggerhead turtles Caretta caretta in the Hawaii-based pelagic longline fishery. Endanger. Species Res. 5, 267–278 (2008).
Wickham, H. Tidy data. J. Stat. Softw. 59, 1–23 (2014).
Evaluating Bycatch: A National Approach to Standardized Bycatch Monitoring Programs (NOAA/NMFS, 2004).
Desfosse, L. L., Karp, W. A. & Brooke, S. G. Evaluating the quality of bycatch data and bycatch estimates among disparate fisheries. Mar. Fish. Rev. 74, 6–13 (2012).
Vanderwal, J., Falconi, L., Januchowski, S., Shoo, L. & Storlie, C. SDMTools. Species distribution modelling tools: tools for processing data associated with species distribution modelling exercises (CRAN, 2014); http://www.rforge.net/SDMTools/
Brodie, S. et al. Improving consumption rate estimates by incorporating wild activity into a bioenergetics model. Ecol. Evol. 6, 2262–2274 (2016).
Murphy, W. & Rowlingson, B. Fiftystater: map data to visualize the fifty US states with Alaska and Hawaii insets (CRAN, 2016); https://github.com/wmurphyrd/fiftystater
We thank the fisheries observers who collected bycatch data that informed this work. Further, we thank the team at the National Observer Program (NOAA/NMFS) for drafting the NBRs, which provided the raw data used in this study. In addition, we appreciate data management assistance by C. Donegan and an internal review by S. Mesnick and J. Carretta (NOAA Southwest Fisheries Science Center). This work was made possible by a California Sea Grant Fellowship to M.S.S. and funding through the Fisheries Information Systems NOAA/NMFS.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Savoca, M.S., Brodie, S., Welch, H. et al. Comprehensive bycatch assessment in US fisheries for prioritizing management. Nat Sustain 3, 472–480 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0506-9
This article is cited by
Asian Horseshoe Crab Bycatch in Intertidal Zones of the Northern Beibu Gulf: Suggestions for Conservation Management
Journal of Ocean University of China (2022)
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries (2021)