Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Conservation implications of limited Native American impacts in pre-contact New England

Matters Arising to this article was published on 20 July 2020

Matters Arising to this article was published on 20 July 2020

An Author Correction to this article was published on 23 June 2020

This article has been updated


An increasingly accepted paradigm in conservation attributes valued modern ecological conditions to past human activities. Disturbances, including prescribed fire, are therefore used by land managers to impede forest development in many potentially wooded landscapes under the interpretation that openland habitats were created and sustained by human-set fire for millennia. We test this paradigm using palaeoenvironmental and archaeological data from New England. Despite the region’s dense population, anthropogenic impacts on the landscape before European contact were limited, and fire activity was independent of changes in human populations. Whereas human populations reached maxima during the Late Archaic (5,000–3,000 yr bp) and Middle–Late Woodland (1,500–500 yr bp) periods, lake-sediment charcoal records indicate elevated fire activity only during the dry early Holocene (10,000–8,000 yr bp) and after European colonization. Pollen data indicate closed forests from 8,000 yr bp to the onset of European deforestation, and archaeological evidence of pre-contact horticultural activity is sparse. Climate largely controlled fire severity in New England during the postglacial interval, and widespread openlands developed only after deforestation for European agriculture. Land managers seeking to emulate pre-contact conditions should de-emphasize human disturbance and focus on developing mature forests; those seeking to maintain openlands should apply the agricultural approaches that initiated them four centuries ago.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type



Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Maps of southern New England showing study sites and archaeological data.
Fig. 2: Postglacial palaeoenvironmental and archaeological data from southern New England.
Fig. 3: Postglacial climate, vegetation and fire in southern New England.
Fig. 4: Late-Holocene palaeoenvironmental and archaeological data from southern New England.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Change history


  1. Kareiva, P., Watts, S., McDonald, R. & Boucher, T. Domesticated nature: shaping landscapes and ecosystems for human welfare. Science 316, 1866–1869 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ellis, E. C. et al. Used planet: a global history. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 7978–7985 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ruddiman, W. F. The anthropogenic greenhouse era began thousands of years ago. Climatic Change 61, 261–293 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaplan, J. O. et al. Holocene carbon emissions as a result of anthropogenic land cover change. Holocene 21, 775–791 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Meggers, B. J. Amazonia: Man and Culture in a Counterfeit Paradise (Aldine-Atherton, 1971).

  6. Denevan, W. The pristine myth: the landscape of the Americas in 1492. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 82, 369–385 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Clement, C. R. et al. The domestication of Amazonia before European conquest. Proc. R. Soc. B 282, 20150813 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Levis, C. et al. Persistent effects of pre-Columbian plant domestication on Amazonian forest composition. Science 355, 925–931 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Abrams, M. D. & Nowacki, G. J. Native Americans as active and passive promoters of mast and fruit trees in the eastern USA. Holocene 18, 1123–1137 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Askins, R. A. Restoring North America’s Birds: Lessons from Landscape Ecology (Yale Univ. Press, 2000).

  11. Poschlod, P. & WallisDeVries, M. F. The historical and socioeconomic perspective of calcareous grasslands—lessons from the distant and recent past. Biol. Conserv. 104, 361–376 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dunwiddie, P. W. & Caljouw, C. in Ecosystem Management: Rare Species and Significant Habitats (eds Mitchell, R. S. et al.) 271–275 (New York State Museum, 1990).

  13. Valko, O. et al. Supporting biodiversity by prescribed burning in grasslands—a multi-taxa approach. Sci. Total Environ. 572, 1377–1384 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dunwiddie, P. W. & Sferra, N. Loss of rare butterfly and plant species in coastal grasslands. Nat. Areas J. 11, 119–120 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dengler, J., Janisova, M., Torok, P. & Wellstein, C. Biodiversity of Palaearctic grasslands: a synthesis. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 182, 1–14 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mann, C. C. 1491: New Revelations of the Americas before Columbus (Knopf, 2005).

  17. Marris, E. Rambunctious Garden: Saving Nature in a Post-wild World (Bloomsbury, 2011).

  18. Pyne, S. J. Fire in America (Princeton Univ. Press, 1982).

  19. Day, G. M. The Indian as an ecological factor in the northeastern forest. Ecology 34, 329–346 (1953).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cronon, W. Changes in the Land: Indians, Colonists, and the Ecology of New England (Hill & Wang, 1983).

  21. Poulos, H. Fire in the Northeast: learning from the past, planning for the future. J. Sustain. 34, 6–29 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Abrams, M. D. & Nowacki, G. J. Exploring the early Anthropocene burning hypothesis and climate-fire anomalies for the eastern U.S. J. Sustain. 34, 30–48 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Foster, D. R. & Motzkin, G. Interpreting and conserving the openland habitats of coastal New England: insights from landscape history. Ecol. Manage. 185, 127–150 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Foster, D. R. & Aber, J. D. Forests in Time: The Environmental Consequences of 1,000 Years of Change in New England (Yale Univ. Press, 2004).

  25. Foster, D. R. A Meeting of Land and Sea: Nature and the Future of Martha’s Vineyard (Yale Univ. Press, 2017).

  26. Dincauze, D. F. in The Pequots in Southern New England: The Fall and Rise of an American Indian Nation (eds Hauptman, L. M. & Wherry, J. D.) 19–32 (Univ. Oklahoma Press, 1990).

  27. Patterson, W. A. III & Sassaman, K. E. in Holocene Human Ecology of Northeastern North America (ed. Nicholas, G. P.) 107–135 (Plenum, 1988).

  28. Robertson, K. M., Poulos, H. M., Camp, A. E. & Tyrrell, M. Introduction to fire ecology in the Northeast: restoring native and cultural ecosystems. J. Sustain. 34, 1–5 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sugita, S. Pollen representation of vegetation in Quaternary sediments: theory and method in patchy vegetation. J. Ecol. 82, 881–897 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Higuera, P. E., Peters, M. E., Brubaker, L. B. & Gavin, D. G. Understanding the origin and analysis of sediment charcoal records with a simulation model. Quat. Sci. Rev. 26, 1790–1809 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Thompson, J. R., Carpenter, D. N., Cogbill, C. & Foster, D. R. Four centuries of change in northeastern U.S. forests. PLoS ONE 8, e72540 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Foster, D. R. Thoreau’s country: a historical-ecological perspective to conservation in the New England landscape. J. Biogeogr. 29, 1537–1555 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Duranleau, D. L. Flexible Sedentism: The Subsistence and Settlement of Coastal New England and New York. PhD thesis, Harvard Univ. (2009).

  34. Munoz, S. E., Gajewski, K. & Peros, M. C. Synchronous environmental and cultural change in the prehistory of the northeastern United States. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 22008–22013 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Shuman, B. N. & Marsicek, J. P. The structure of Holocene climate change in mid-latitude North America. Quat. Sci. Rev. 141, 38–51 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Keeley, J. E. Fire intensity, fire severity and burn severity: a brief review and suggested usage. Int. J. Wildland Fire 18, 116–126 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Chilton, E. S. & Hardy, M. D. in The Cambridge World Prehistory (eds Renfrew, C. & Bahn, P.) 1293–1308 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

  38. Oswald, W. W. et al. Subregional variability in the response of New England vegetation to postglacial climate change. J. Biogeogr. 45, 2375–2388 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Faison, E. K., Foster, D. R. & Oswald, W. W. Early Holocene openlands in southern New England. Ecology 87, 2537–2547 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Doucette, D. L. Unraveling Middle Archaic Expressions: A Multidisciplinary Approach towards Feature and Material Culture Recognition in Southeastern New England. PhD thesis, Harvard Univ. (2003).

  41. Chilton, E. S. in Ancient Complexities: New Perspectives in Pre-Columbian North America (ed. Alt, S.) 96–103 (Univ. Utah Press, 2010).

  42. Ritchie, W. A. The Archaeology of Martha’s Vineyard: A Framework for the Prehistory of Southern New England. A Study in Coastal Ecology and Adaptation (Natural History, 1969).

  43. Doucette, D. L. & Herbster, H. Intensive Archaeological Survey of the Red Gate Farm-Lot 1 Project Area, Aquinnah, Massachusetts (Public Archaeology Laboratory, 2005).

  44. Ledig, F. T. & Fryer, J. H. A pocket of variability in Pinus rigida. Evolution 26, 259–266 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Motzkin, G., Orwig, D. A. & Foster, D. R. Vegetation and disturbance history of a rare dwarf pitch pine community in western New England, USA. J. Biogeogr. 29, 1455–1467 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Sandplain Grassland Network (Woods Hole Research Center, 2019);

  47. Foster, D. R., Motzkin, G., Bernardos, D. & Cardoza, J. Wildlife dynamics in the changing New England landscape. J. Biogeogr. 29, 1337–1357 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Wofsy, S. C. et al. Net exchange of CO2 in a mid-latitude forest. Science 260, 1314–1317 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Donahue, B. et al. A New England Food Vision (Univ. New Hampshire, 2014).

  50. Reimer, P. J. et al. IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50,000 years cal bp. Radiocarbon 55, 1869–1887 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Haslett, J. & Parnell, A. A simple monotone process with application to radiocarbon-dated depth chronologies. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. C 57, 399–418 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Fægri, K. & Iversen, J. Textbook of Pollen Analysis (John Wiley & Sons, 1989).

  53. Whitlock, C. & Larsen, C. in Tracking Environmental Change Using Lake Sediments (eds Smol, J. P. et al.) 75–97 (Kluwer, 2001).

  54. Daily Temperature Accumulations − 32 Base Temp (USA National Phenology Network, 2019);

  55. Foster, D. & Gould, E. Forest Change and Human Populations in New England 1600–2006 (2009);

Download references


We thank D. Donnelly, E. Doughty, E. Faison, B. Hall, B. Hansen, K. Kirakosian, D. MacDonald, T. Parshall, M. Patel and E. Taylor for their contributions. D. Orwig, N. Pederson and S. Munoz provided constructive feedback. Data were provided by the USA National Phenology Network. This research was supported by National Science Foundation grant nos DBI‐0452254, DBI‐1003938, DBI‐1459519, DEB‐0620443, DEB‐0815036, DEB-0816731, DEB‐0952792, DEB‐1146207, DEB-1146286, DEB‐1146297 and DEB‐1237491.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



W.W.O., D.R.F., B.N.S., E.S.C., D.L.Doucette and D.L.Duranleau designed the project and participated in fieldwork, laboratory work and/or data analyses. W.W.O. and D.R.F. wrote the first version of the paper. W.W.O., D.R.F., B.N.S., E.S.C., D.L.Doucette and D.L.Duranleau contributed to the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Wyatt Oswald.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Tables 1 and 2.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oswald, W.W., Foster, D.R., Shuman, B.N. et al. Conservation implications of limited Native American impacts in pre-contact New England. Nat Sustain 3, 241–246 (2020).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing