Large-scale area-based conservation measures affect millions of people globally. Understanding their social impacts is necessary to improve effectiveness and minimize negative consequences. However, quantifying the impacts of conservation measures that affect large geographic areas and diverse peoples is expensive and methodologically challenging, particularly because such evaluations should capture locally defined conceptions of well-being while permitting policy-relevant comparisons. Here, we measure the impact of Tanzania’s Wildlife Management Areas (WMAs), a national community-based conservation and poverty reduction initiative. We use a novel, cost-effective impact evaluation method based on participatory wealth ranking and Bayesian multilevel modelling. We find that from 2007 to 2015 the impacts of WMAs on wealth were small and variable, with no clear evidence of widespread poverty reduction. Accompanying qualitative data suggest that apparently positive effects in one WMA cannot be directly attributed to WMA activities. Our results suggest that current WMA policy needs to be revisited if it is to promote positive local development.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Computer code used in this analysis is available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Watson, J. E. M., Dudley, N., Segan, D. B. & Hockings, M. The performance and potential of protected areas. Nature 515, 67–73 (2014).
Roe, D., Elliott, J., Sandbrook, C. & Walpole, M. Biodiversity Conservation and Poverty Alleviation: Exploring the Evidence for a Link (John Wiley & Sons, 2012).
Martin, A. Just Conservation: Biodiversity, Wellbeing and Sustainability (Taylor & Francis, 2017).
Pullin, A. S. et al. Human well-being impacts of terrestrial protected areas. Environ. Evid. 2, 19 (2013).
den Braber, B., Evans, K. L. & Oldekop, J. A. Impact of protected areas on poverty, extreme poverty, and inequality in nepal. Conserv. Lett. 33, e12576 (2018).
Jones, N., McGinlay, J. & Dimitrakopoulos, P. G. Improving social impact assessment of protected areas: a review of the literature and directions for future research. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 64, 1–7 (2017).
Oldekop, J. A., Holmes, G., Harris, W. E. & Evans, K. L. A global assessment of the social and conservation outcomes of protected areas. Conserv. Biol. 30, 133–141 (2016).
Schleicher, J. The environmental and social impacts of protected areas and conservation concessions in South America. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 32, 1–8 (2018).
Naidoo, R. et al. Evaluating the impacts of protected areas on human well-being across the developing world. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav3006 (2019).
Oldekop, J. A., Sims, K. R. E., Karna, B. K., Whittingham, M. J. & Agrawal, A. Reductions in deforestation and poverty from decentralized forest management in Nepal. Nat. Sustain. 2, 421–428 (2019).
Ferraro, P. J. & Pressey, R. L. Measuring the difference made by conservation initiatives: protected areas and their environmental and social impacts. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 370, 20140270 (2015).
Baylis, K. et al. Mainstreaming impact evaluation in nature conservation. Conserv. Lett. 9, 58–64 (2016).
Woodhouse, E. et al. Guiding principles for evaluating the impacts of conservation interventions on human well-being. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 370, 20150103 (2015).
Agarwala, M. et al. Assessing the relationship between human well-being and ecosystem services: a review of frameworks. Conserv. Soc. 12, 437–449 (2014).
Palmer Fry, B. et al. Monitoring local well-being in environmental interventions: a consideration of practical trade-offs. Oryx 51, 68–76 (2017).
Howland, O., Noe, C. & Brockington, D. The multiple meanings of prosperity and poverty: a cross-site comparison from Tanzania. J. Peasant Stud. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2019.1658080 (2019).
Woodhouse, E. & McCabe, J. T. Well-being and conservation: diversity and change in visions of a good life among the Maasai of northern Tanzania. Ecol. Soc. 23, 43 (2018).
Ferraro, P. J., Hanauer, M. M. & Sims, K. R. E. Conditions associated with protected area success in conservation and poverty reduction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 13913–13918 (2011).
Pfaff, A., Robalino, J., Sanchez-Azofeifa, G. A., Andam, K. S. & Ferraro, P. J. Park location affects forest protection: land characteristics cause differences in park impacts across Costa Rica. B. E. J. Econom. Anal. Policy 9, (2009).
Ferraro, P. J. & Miranda, J. J. Heterogeneous treatment effects and mechanisms in information-based environmental policies: evidence from a large-scale field experiment. Res. Energy Econ. 35, 356–379 (2013).
Rasolofoson, R. A. et al. Impacts of community forest management on human economic well-being across Madagascar. Conserv. Lett. 10, 346–353 (2017).
Gelman, A. & Hill, J. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006).
Sills, E. O. et al. Building the evidence base for REDD+: study design and methods for evaluating the impacts of conservation interventions on local well-being. Glob. Environ. Change 43, 148–160 (2017).
Andam, K. S., Ferraro, P. J., Sims, K. R. E., Healy, A. & Holland, M. B. Protected areas reduced poverty in Costa Rica and Thailand. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 9996–10001 (2010).
Ho, D. E., Imai, K., King, G. & Stuart, E. A. Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Polit. Anal. 15, 199–236 (2007).
Arriagada, R. A., Sills, E. O., Pattanayak, S. K. & Ferraro, P. J. Combining qualitative and quantitative methods to evaluate participation in Costa Rica’s program of payments for environmental services. J. Sustain. For. 28, 343–367 (2009).
Margoluis, R., Stem, C., Salafsky, N. & Brown, M. Design alternatives for evaluating the impact of conservation projects. N. Dir. Eval. 2009, 85–96 (2009).
Tanzania’s Wildlife Management Areas: A 2012 Status Report (WWF, 2014).
Bluwstein, J. et al. A quasi-experimental study of impacts of Tanzania’s wildlife management areas on rural livelihoods and wealth. Sci. Data 5, 180087 (2018).
Noe, C. & Kangalawe, R. Y. M. Wildlife protection, community participation in conservation, and (dis) empowerment in southern Tanzania. Conserv. Soc. 13, 244 (2015).
Bluwstein, J. & Lund, J. F. Territoriality by conservation in the Selous–Niassa corridor in Tanzania. World Dev. 101, 453–465 (2018).
Wright, C. V. Turbulent terrains: the contradictions and politics of decentralised conservation. Conserv. Soc. 15, 157 (2017).
Moyo, F., Ijumba, J. & Lund, J. F. Failure by design? Revisiting Tanzania’s flagship Wildlife Management Area Burunge. Conserv. Soc. 14, 232 (2016).
Benjaminsen, T. A., Goldman, M. J., Minwary, M. Y. & Maganga, F. P. Wildlife management in Tanzania: state control, rent seeking and community resistance. Dev. Change 44, 1087–1109 (2013).
Igoe, J. & Croucher, B. Conservation, commerce, and communities: the story of community-based wildlife management areas in Tanzania’s northern tourist circuit. Conserv. Soc. 5, 534–561 (2007).
Brockington, D., Howland, O., Loiske, V.-M., Mnzava, M. & Noe, C. Economic growth, rural assets and prosperity: exploring the implications of a 20-year record of asset growth in Tanzania. J. Mod. Afr. Stud. 56, 217–243 (2018).
Tanzania Mainland Poverty Assessment (World Bank, 2015).
Kangalawe, R. Y. M. & Noe, C. Biodiversity conservation and poverty alleviation in Namtumbo district, Tanzania. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 162, 90–100 (2012).
Noe, C. Contesting Village Land: Uranium and Sport Hunting in Mbarang’andu Wildlife Management Area, Tanzania (The Land Deal Politics Initiative, 2013).
Homewood, K. et al. The Economic and Social Viability of Tanzanian Wildlife Management Areas (Copenhagen Centre for Development Research, 2015).
Bluwstein, J. Creating ecotourism territories: environmentalities in Tanzania’s community-based conservation. Geoforum 83, 101–113 (2017).
Bluwstein, J., Moyo, F. & Kicheleri, R. P. Austere conservation: understanding conflicts over resource governance in Tanzanian wildlife management areas. Conserv. Soc. 14, 218 (2016).
Homewood, K. et al. Realising the Promise of Tanzania’s Wildlife Management Areas (ESPA, 2017).
Williams, A. Community Natural Resources Management in Tanzania (Africa Biodiversity Collaborative Group, 2017).
Butchart, S. H. M. et al. Shortfalls and solutions for meeting national and global conservation area targets. Conserv. Lett. 8, 329–337 (2015).
de Lange, E., Woodhouse, E. & Milner-Gulland, E. J. Approaches used to evaluate the social impacts of protected areas. Conserv. Lett. 9, 327–333 (2016).
Lund, J. F., Shackleton, S. & Luckert, M. in Measuring Livelihoods and Environmental Dependence: Methods for Research and Fieldwork (eds Angelsen, A. et al.) 175–189 (Earthscan, 2011).
Scoones, I. Investigating difference: applications of wealth ranking and household survey approaches among farming households in southern Zimbabwe. Dev. Change 26, 67–88 (1995).
Agresti, A. Categorical Data Analysis (Wiley, 2002).
Mkukuta: Tanzania’s National Strategy for Growth and Reduction of Poverty (United Republic of Tanzania, 2005).
Bluwstein, J. et al. Between dependence and deprivation: the interlocking nature of land alienation in Tanzania. J. Agrar. Change 18, 806–830 (2018).
Naidoo, R. et al. Complementary benefits of tourism and hunting to communal conservancies in Namibia. Conserv. Biol. 30, 628–638 (2016).
Naidoo, R. et al. Effect of diversity of large wildlife species on financial benefits to local communities in northwest Namibia. Environ. Resour. Econ. 48, 321–335 (2011).
Lindsey, P. A. et al. Benefits of wildlife-based land uses on private lands in Namibia and limitations affecting their development. Oryx 47, 41–53 (2013).
Goldman, M. Partitioned nature, privileged knowledge: community-based conservation in Tanzania. Dev. Change 34, 833–862 (2003).
Nelson, F. Emerging or Illusory? Community Wildlife Management in Tanzania (IIED, 2007).
Galvin, K., Beeton, T. & Luizza, M. African community-based conservation: a systematic review of social and ecological outcomes. Ecol. Soc. 23, 39 (2018).
Sulle, E., Lekaita, E. & Nelson, F. From Promise to Performance? Wildlife Management Areas in Northern Tanzania (Tanzania Natural Resource Forum and Maliasili Initiatives, 2011).
Pailler, S., Naidoo, R., Burgess, N. D., Freeman, O. E. & Fisher, B. Impacts of community-based natural resource management on wealth, food security and child health in Tanzania. PLoS ONE 10, e0133252 (2015).
Salerno, J., Mulder, M. B., Grote, M. N., Ghiselli, M. & Packer, C. Household livelihoods and conflict with wildlife in community-based conservation areas across northern Tanzania. Oryx 50, 702–712 (2016).
Homewood, K., Nielsen, M. & Keane, A. Women, wellbeing and Wildlife Management Areas in Tanzania. J. Peasant Stud. (in press).
Zafra-Calvo, N., Lobo, J. M., Prada, C., Nielsen, M. R. & Burgess, N. D. Predictors of elephant poaching in a wildlife crime hotspot: the Ruvuma landscape of southern Tanzania and northern Mozambique. J. Nat. Conserv. 41, 79–87 (2018).
Angrist, J. D. & Pischke, J.-S. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton Univ. Press, 2008).
Homewood, K., Kristjanson, P., & Trench, P. C. (eds) Staying Maasai?: Livelihoods, Conservation and Development in East African Rangelands (Springer-Verlag, 2009).
White, H. Theory-based impact evaluation: principles and practice. J. Dev. Eff. 1, 271–284 (2009).
Jagger, P., Luckert, M. K., Banana, A. & Bahati, J. Asking questions to understand rural livelihoods: comparing disaggregated vs. aggregated approaches to household livelihood questionnaires. World Dev. 40, 1810–1823 (2012).
R. Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2018).
Carpenter, B. et al. Stan: a probabilistic programming language. J. Stat. Softw. 76, 1–32 (2017).
Gelman, A. Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models (comment on article by Browne and Draper). Bayesian Anal. 1, 515–534 (2006).
Gelman, A. Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations. Stat. Med. 27, 2865–2873 (2008).
This research was carried out as part of the project Poverty and Ecosystem Impacts of Tanzania’s Wildlife Management Areas (PIMA), NE/L00139X/1, funded with support from the Ecosystem Services for Poverty Alleviation (ESPA) programme. The ESPA programme was funded by the Department for International Development (DFID), the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC). A.K. also acknowledges support from the Understanding the Impacts of the Current El Niño programme of NERC and Department for International Development (DfID) (grant reference no. NE/P004725/1). We thank the Government of Tanzania for their permission to carry out fieldwork associated with this research project and the Tanzanian communities who participated in the research.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Keane, A., Lund, J.F., Bluwstein, J. et al. Impact of Tanzania’s Wildlife Management Areas on household wealth. Nat Sustain 3, 226–233 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0458-0