Producing biochemicals from renewable resources is a key driver for moving towards sustainable societies. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a standardized tool to measure related progress by quantifying environmental sustainability performance of chemical products along their life cycles. We analysed LCA studies applied to commercialized commodity biochemicals produced through microbial fermentation. The few available studies show inconsistencies in coverage of environmental impacts and life cycle stages, with varying conclusions. Claims of better sustainability performance of biochemicals over fossil-based chemicals are often based on comparing global warming impacts, while ignoring other impacts from bio-feedstock production. To boost sustainable biochemicals, we recommend that LCA practitioners include the broader range of impact indicators and entire life cycles, follow standards and guidance, and address missing data. The biochemical industry should systematically use LCA to direct research, identify impact hotspots, and develop methods to estimate full-scale process performance. This will promote biotechnology as important contributor to solving existing sustainability challenges.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Aranoff, S. L. et al. Industrial Biotechnology: Development and Adoption by the U.S. Chemical and Biofuel Industries (United States International Trade Commission, 2008).
IPCC Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
International Energy Outlook (United States Energy Information Administration, 2016).
Khoo, H. H., Ee, W. L. & Isoni, V. Bio-chemicals from lignocellulose feedstock: sustainability, LCA and the green conundrum. Green Chem. 18, 1912–1922 (2016).
Papong, S. et al. Comparative assessment of the environmental profile of PLA and PET drinking water bottles from a life cycle perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 65, 539–550 (2014).
Leejarkpai, T., Mungcharoen, T. & Suwanmanee, U. Comparative assessment of global warming impact and eco-efficiency of PS (polystyrene), PET (polyethylene terephthalate) and PLA (polylactic acid) boxes. J. Clean. Prod. 125, 95–107 (2016).
Biddy, M. J., Scarlata, C. & Kinchin, C. Chemicals from Biomass: A Market Assessment of Bioproducts with Near-Term Potential (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2016).
Hottle, T. A., Bilec, M. M. & Landis, A. E. Sustainability assessments of bio-based polymers. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 98, 1898–1907 (2013).
Werpy, T. et al. Top Value Added Chemicals From Biomass Volume 1—Results of Screening for Potential Candidates From Sugars and Synthesis Gas (US Department of Energy, 2004).
Biomass Research and Development Act of 2000 (US Department of Energy, 2000).
Bozell, J. J. & Petersen, G. R. Technology development for the production of biobased products from biorefinery carbohydrates-the US Department of Energy’s “Top 10” revisited. Green Chem. 12, 539–554 (2010).
Choi, S., Song, C. W., Shin, J. H. & Lee, S. Y. Biorefineries for the production of top building block chemicals and their derivatives. Metab. Eng. 28, 223–239 (2015).
Opportunities for the Fermentation-Based Chemical Industry (Deloitte, 2014).
ISO 14040 International Standard. Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Principles and Framework (International Organization for Standardization, 2006).
Zhu, Y., Romain, C. & Williams, C. K. Sustainable polymers from renewable resources. Nature 540, 354–362 (2016).
Shonnard, D. R. et al. A review of environmental life cycle assessments of liquid transportation biofuels in the Pan American region. Environ. Manag. 56, 1356–1376 (2015).
Cherubini, F. & Strømman, A. H. Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: state of the art and future challenges. Bioresour. Technol. 102, 437–451 (2011).
Malça, J. & Freire, F. Life-cycle studies of biodiesel in Europe: a review addressing the variability of results and modeling issues. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 15, 338–351 (2011).
Amiri, T. Y. & Ghasemzadeh, K. in Ethanol. Science and Engineering (eds Basile, A. et al.) 451–504 (Elsevier, 2019).
Lari, G. M. et al. Environmental and economical perspectives of a glycerol biorefinery. Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 1012–1029 (2018).
National Center for Biotechnology Information PubCHem (Bethesda, 2018).
ISO 14044 International Standard. Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Requirements and Guidelines (International Organization for Standardization, 2006).
Daful, A. G., Haigh, K., Vaskan, P. & Görgens, J. F. Environmental impact assessment of lignocellulosic lactic acid production: integrated with existing sugar mills. Food Bioprod. Process. 99, 58–70 (2016).
Patel, M. et al. Medium and Long-Term Opportunities and Risks of the Biotechnological Production of Bulk Chemicals from Renewable Resources - The Potential of White Biotechnology (Utrecht University, Department of Science, Technology and Society / Copernicus Institute, 2006).
Hermann, B. G., Blok, K. & Patel, M. K. Producing bio-based bulk chemicals using industrial biotechnology saves energy and combats climate change. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41, 7915–7921 (2007).
Suwanmanee, U. et al. Life cycle assessment of single use thermoform boxes made from polystyrene (PS), polylactic acid, (PLA), and PLA/starch: cradle to consumer gate. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 18, 401–417 (2013).
Isola, C. et al. Life cycle assessment of photodegradable polymeric material derived from renewable bioresources. J. Clean. Prod. 142, 2935–2944 (2017).
Madival, S., Auras, R., Singh, S. P. & Narayan, R. Assessment of the environmental profile of PLA, PET and PS clamshell containers using LCA methodology. J. Clean. Prod. 17, 1183–1194 (2009).
Cok, B., Tsiropoulos, I., Roes, A. L. & Patel, M. K. Succinic acid production derived from carbohydrates: an energy and greenhouse gas assessment of a platform chemical toward a bio-based economy. Biofuels Bioprod. Bioref. 8, 16–29 (2014).
Smidt, M. et al. in Sustainability Assessment of Renewables-Based Products (eds Dewulf, J., De Meester, S. & Alvarenga, R. A. F.) 307–321 (John Wiley & Sons, 2016).
Groot, W. J. & Borén, T. Life cycle assessment of the manufacture of lactide and PLA biopolymers from sugarcane in Thailand. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 15, 970–984 (2010).
Morales, M. et al. Environmental and economic assessment of lactic acid production from glycerol using cascade bio- and chemocatalysis. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 558–567 (2015).
Pinazo, J. M., Domine, M. E., Parvulescu, V. & Petru, F. Sustainability metrics for succinic acid production: a comparison between biomass-based and petrochemical routes. Catal. Today 239, 17–24 (2015).
Morales, M. et al. Sustainability assessment of succinic acid production technologies from biomass using metabolic engineering. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 2794–2805 (2016).
Breedveld, L. et al. LCA of vegetarian burger packed in biobased polybutylene succinate. In Proc. 9th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Sector (LCA Food 2014) (eds Schenck, R. & Huizen, D.) 157–166 (American Center for Life Cycle Assessment, 2014).
Patel, M. K. et al. Second-generation bio-based plastics are becoming a reality - non-renewable energy and greenhouse gas (GHG) balance of succinic acid-based plastic end products made from lignocellulosic biomass. Biofuels Bioprod. Bioref. 12, 426–441 (2018).
Forte, A., Zucaro, A., Basosi, R. & Fierro, A. LCA of 1,4-butanediol produced via direct fermentation of sugars from wheat straw feedstock within a territorial biorefinery. Materials 9, 563 (2016).
Laurent, A. et al. Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems - part I: lessons learned and perspectives. Waste Manag. 34, 573–588 (2014).
Vink, E. T. H. & Davies, S. Life cycle inventory and impact assessment data for 2014 Ingeo™ polylactide production. Ind. Biotechnol. 11, 167–180 (2015).
Thomassen, G., Van Dael, M., Lemmens, B. & Van Passel, S. A review of the sustainability of algal-based biorefineries: Towards an integrated assessment framework. Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev. 68, 876–887 (2017).
Life Cycle Assessment: Principles and Practice (US Environmental Protection Agency, 2006).
EN 16760:2015: Bio-based Products - Life Cycle Assessment (European Committee for Standardisation, 2015).
Hauschild, M. Z. Assessing environmental impacts in a life-cycle perspective. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39, 81A–88A (2005).
Hauschild, M., Rosenbaum, R. & Olsen, S. I. Life Cycle Assessment: Theory and Practice (Springer, 2018).
ecoinvent Version 3.5 (ecoinvent, 2018).
Ögmundarson, Ó., Sukumara, S., Laurent, A. & Fantke, P. Environmental hotspots of lactic acid production systems. Glob. Change Biol. Bioenerg. 12, 19–38 (2020).
Wannaz, C., Fantke, P. & Jolliet, O. Multi-scale spatial modeling of human exposure from local sources to global intake. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 701–711 (2018).
Mutel, C. et al. Overview and recommendations for regionalized life cycle impact assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 24, 856–865 (2019).
Kirchain, R. E. Jr, Gregory, J. R. & Olivetti, E. A. Environmental life-cycle assessment. Nat. Mater. 16, 693–697 (2017).
Schmidt, J. H., Weidema, B. P. & Brandão, M. A framework for modelling indirect land use changes in Life Cycle Assessment. J. Clean. Prod. 99, 230–238 (2015).
Bakshi, B. R. The path to a sustainable chemical industry: progress and problems. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 1, 64–68 (2011).
Dunn, J. B., Adom, F. K., Sather, N. F. & Han, J. in Commercializing Biobased Products: Opportunities, Challenges, Benefits, and Risks (ed. Snyder, S. W.) 258–284 (RSC, 2016).
Hauschild, M. Z. Better – but is it good enough? On the need to consider both eco-efficiency and eco-effectiveness to gauge industrial sustainability. Procedia CIRP 29, 1–7 (2015).
Towler, G. & Sinnott, R. in Chemical Engineering Design 2nd edn (eds Towler, G. & Sinnott, R.) 307–354 (Butterworth-Heinemann, 2013).
Steffen, W., Broadgate, W., Deutsch, L., Gaffney, O. & Ludwig, C. The trajectory of the Anthropocene: the great acceleration. Anthropocene Rev. 2, 81–98 (2015).
Fantke, P. & Illner, N. Goods that are good enough: introducing an absolute sustainability perspective for managing chemicals in consumer products. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 15, 91–97 (2019).
From the Sugar Platform to Biofuels and Biochemicals (European Commission Directorate-General Energy, 2015).
Cathay Industrial Biotech Ltd. Cathay Industrial Biotech Ltd. announces ground-breaking and agreement signing for significant expansion in bio-produced monomer and polyamide production. PR Newswire / Cision Communication Cloud https://go.nature.com/36IgGDP (June 2016).
Aeschelmann, F. & Carus, M. Bio-based Building Blocks and Polymers (nova-Institut GmbH, 2016).
Bohlmann, G. M. Biodegradable packaging life-cycle assessment. Environ. Prog. 23, 342–346 (2004).
Shen, L., Worrell, E. & Patel, M. K. Comparing life cycle energy and GHG emissions of bio-based PET, recycled PET, PLA, and man-made cellulosics. Biofuels Bioprod. Bioref. 6, 625–639 (2012).
Adom, F. K. & Dunn, J. B. Life cycle analysis of corn-stover-derived polymer-grade l-lactic acid and ethyl lactate: greenhouse gas emissions and fossil energy consumption. Biofuels Bioprod. Bioref. 11, 258–268 (2017).
Ingrao, C. et al. Polylactic acid trays for fresh-food packaging: a carbon footprint assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 537, 385–398 (2015).
van der Harst, E., Potting, J. & Kroeze, C. Multiple data sets and modelling choices in a comparative LCA of disposable beverage cups. Sci. Total Environ. 494–495, 129–143 (2014).
Gaudreault, C., Samson, R., Chambost, V. & Stuart, P. LCA for the engineering analysis of the forest biorefinery. Appita J. 63, 206–230 (2010).
Vink, E. T. H., Davies, S. & Kolstad, J. J. The eco-profile for current Ingeo® polylactide production. Ind. Biotechnol. 6, 212–224 (2010).
Landis, A. E. in Poly(Lactic Acid): Synthesis, Structures, Properties, Processing, and Applications (eds Auras, R. et al.) 431–441 (John Wiley and Sons, 2010).
Gironi, F. & Piemonte, V. Life cycle assessment of polylactic acid and polyethylene terephthalate bottles for drinking water. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 30, 459–468 (2011).
Vink, E. T. H., Rábago, K. R., Glassner, D. A. & Gruber, P. R. Applications of life cycle assessment to NatureWorks™ polylactide (PLA) production. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 80, 403–419 (2003).
Vink, E. T. H., Glassner, D. A., Kolstad, J. J., Wooley, R. J. & O’Connor, R. P. The eco-profiles for current and near-future NatureWorks® polylactide (PLA) production. Ind. Biotechnol. 3, 58–81 (2007).
Tecchio, P., Freni, P., De Benedetti, B. & Fenouillot, F. Ex-ante life cycle assessment approach developed for a case study on bio-based polybutylene succinate. J. Clean. Prod. 112, 316–325 (2016).
Adom, F., Dunn, J. B., Han, J. & Sather, N. Life-cycle fossil energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions of bioderived chemicals and their conventional counterparts. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 14624–14631 (2014).
Lane, J. The DOE’s 12 top biobased molecules – what became of them? BiofuelsDigest https://go.nature.com/32rgg12 (April 2015).
This work was supported by the EU FP7 project Biorefine 2G (grant 613771) and by the Novo Nordisk Foundation. We thank S. Sukumara, A. Garcia Sancho and N. Kirchhübel for input to an earlier manuscript draft.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Ögmundarson, Ó., Herrgård, M.J., Forster, J. et al. Addressing environmental sustainability of biochemicals. Nat Sustain 3, 167–174 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0442-8
Sustainability check for bio-based technologies: A review of process-based and life cycle approaches
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (2021)
Carbohydrate Polymers (2020)
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering (2020)
Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry (2020)