Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Measuring resilience is essential to understand it

The terms sustainability, resilience and others group under the heading of ‘stability’. Their ubiquity speaks to a vital need to characterize changes in complex social and environmental systems. In a bewildering array of terms, practical measurements are essential to permit comparisons and so untangle underlying relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Changes in an index of the harvest of wintering woodcocks and the US stock index.


  1. Donohue, I. et al. Ecol. Lett. 19, 1172–1185 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pimm, S. L. Nature 307, 321–326 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Grafton, R. Q. et al. Nat. Sustain. (2019).

  4. Tavor, T. & Teitler-Regev, S. Jàmbá 11, a534 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fussell, E. Am. Behav. Sci. 59, 1231–1245 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pimm, S. L. The Balance of Nature? Ecological Issues in the Conservation of Species and Communities (Univ. Chicago Press, 1991).

  7. Arnoldi, J.-F., Bideault, A., Loreau, M. & Haegeman, B. J. Theor. Biol. 436, 79–92 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Keneni, G., Bekele, E., Imtiaz, M. & Dagne, K. Int. J. Plant Res. 2, 69–79 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Isbell, F. et al. Nature 526, 574–577 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Inchausti, P. & Halley, J. Science 293, 655–657 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pimm, S. L. & Redfearn, A. Nature 334, 613–614 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Holling, C. S. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 4, 1–23 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Montoya, J. M., Donohue, I. & Pimm, S. L. Trends Ecol. Evol. 33, 71–73 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lovejoy, T. E. & Nobre, C. Sci. Adv. 4, eaat2340 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Scheffers, B. R. et al. Science 354, aaf7671 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kéfi, S., Holmgren, M. & Scheffer, M. Funct. Ecol. 30, 88–97 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Stein, C., Harpole, W. S. & Suding, K. N. Ecology 97, 2319–2330 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Capon, S. J. et al. Sci. Total Environ. 534, 122–130 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Royama, T. Ecol. Monogr. 54, 429–462 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hutchings, J. A. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 62, 824–832 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. WWF Living Planet Report 2016. Risk and Resilience in a New Era (WWW International, 2016).

  22. Rockström, J. Beyond the Anthropocene. World Economic Forum (14 February 2017);

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stuart L. Pimm.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pimm, S.L., Donohue, I., Montoya, J.M. et al. Measuring resilience is essential to understand it. Nat Sustain 2, 895–897 (2019).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing