The impact of agricultural interventions can be doubled by using satellite data

Article metrics

Abstract

Feeding a growing population while reducing negative environmental impacts is one of the greatest challenges of the coming decades. We show that microsatellite data can be used to detect the impact of sustainable intensification interventions at large scales and to target the fields that would benefit the most, thereby doubling yield gains. Our work reveals that satellite data provide a scalable approach to sustainably increase food production.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Mean yield and nitrogen use efficiency gain from the sustainable intensification technology.
Fig. 2: Relative yield gain from targeting the sustainable intensification technology.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Code availability

The code that supports the findings of this study is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J. & Befort, B. L. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 20260–20264 (2011).

  2. 2.

    Pretty, J. N., Morison, J. I. L. & Hine, R. E. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 95, 217–234 (2003).

  3. 3.

    Carletto, C., Jolliffe, D. & Banerjee, R. The Emperor has no Data! Agricultural Statistics in Sub-Saharan Africa World Bank Working Paper (2013); https://go.nature.com/2kv2kTX

  4. 4.

    Lobell, D. B., Cassman, K. G. & Field, C. B. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resourc. 34, 179–204 (2009).

  5. 5.

    Jain, M. et al. Remote Sens. 8, 860 (2016).

  6. 6.

    Burke, M. B. & Lobell, D. B. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 2189–2194 (2017).

  7. 7.

    Lobell, D. B. et al. Science 319, 607–610 (2008).

  8. 8.

    Database on Agriculture (FAO, 2016); http://www.fao.org/faostat/

  9. 9.

    Jain, M. et al. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 094011 (2017).

  10. 10.

    Mueller, N. D. et al. Nature 490, 254–257 (2012).

  11. 11.

    van Ittersum, M. K. et al. Field Crops Res. 143, 4–17 (2013).

  12. 12.

    Giné, X. & Yang, D. J. Dev. Econ. 89, 1–11 (2009).

  13. 13.

    Shrestha, R. B. & Gopalakrishnan, C. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change 41, 407–418 (1993).

  14. 14.

    Nguy-Robertson, A. L. et al. Agric. For. Meteorol. 192, 140–148 (2014).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the field staff at CSISA for conducting fieldwork, B. Weeks, the Jain lab, N. Wale and A. Agrawal for discussions about this manuscript, and Planet for providing access to Planetscope and Skysat data. This work was funded by the NSF SEES Postdoctoral fellowship (award no. 1415436 to M.J.) and the NASA Land Cover and Land Use Change grant (no. NNX17AH97G to M.J., D.B.L. and B.-S.).

Author information

M.J., D.B.L., B.-S. and A.J.M. conceptualized the research. M.J., S.P., A.K.S., P.R. and G.A. collected, processed and cleaned the data. J.B. conducted the nitrogen use efficiency analysis. M.J. conducted all other formal analysis and wrote the original draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to reviewing and editing the manuscript.

Correspondence to Meha Jain.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Methods, refs. 1–7, Figs. 1–3 and Tables 1–9.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Further reading