Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The impact of agricultural interventions can be doubled by using satellite data

Abstract

Feeding a growing population while reducing negative environmental impacts is one of the greatest challenges of the coming decades. We show that microsatellite data can be used to detect the impact of sustainable intensification interventions at large scales and to target the fields that would benefit the most, thereby doubling yield gains. Our work reveals that satellite data provide a scalable approach to sustainably increase food production.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Mean yield and nitrogen use efficiency gain from the sustainable intensification technology.
Fig. 2: Relative yield gain from targeting the sustainable intensification technology.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Code availability

The code that supports the findings of this study is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J. & Befort, B. L. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 20260–20264 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Pretty, J. N., Morison, J. I. L. & Hine, R. E. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 95, 217–234 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Carletto, C., Jolliffe, D. & Banerjee, R. The Emperor has no Data! Agricultural Statistics in Sub-Saharan Africa World Bank Working Paper (2013); https://go.nature.com/2kv2kTX

  4. 4.

    Lobell, D. B., Cassman, K. G. & Field, C. B. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resourc. 34, 179–204 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Jain, M. et al. Remote Sens. 8, 860 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Burke, M. B. & Lobell, D. B. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 2189–2194 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Lobell, D. B. et al. Science 319, 607–610 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Database on Agriculture (FAO, 2016); http://www.fao.org/faostat/

  9. 9.

    Jain, M. et al. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 094011 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Mueller, N. D. et al. Nature 490, 254–257 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    van Ittersum, M. K. et al. Field Crops Res. 143, 4–17 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Giné, X. & Yang, D. J. Dev. Econ. 89, 1–11 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Shrestha, R. B. & Gopalakrishnan, C. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change 41, 407–418 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Nguy-Robertson, A. L. et al. Agric. For. Meteorol. 192, 140–148 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the field staff at CSISA for conducting fieldwork, B. Weeks, the Jain lab, N. Wale and A. Agrawal for discussions about this manuscript, and Planet for providing access to Planetscope and Skysat data. This work was funded by the NSF SEES Postdoctoral fellowship (award no. 1415436 to M.J.) and the NASA Land Cover and Land Use Change grant (no. NNX17AH97G to M.J., D.B.L. and B.-S.).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.J., D.B.L., B.-S. and A.J.M. conceptualized the research. M.J., S.P., A.K.S., P.R. and G.A. collected, processed and cleaned the data. J.B. conducted the nitrogen use efficiency analysis. M.J. conducted all other formal analysis and wrote the original draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to reviewing and editing the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meha Jain.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Methods, refs. 1–7, Figs. 1–3 and Tables 1–9.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jain, M., Balwinder-Singh, Rao, P. et al. The impact of agricultural interventions can be doubled by using satellite data. Nat Sustain 2, 931–934 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0396-x

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing