Researchers, stakeholders and funding organizations have embraced co-production of knowledge to solve sustainability problems. Research focusing on the practice of co-production can help us understand what works in what contexts and how to avoid potentially undesirable outcomes.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Tackling the Science Usability Gap in a Warming World: Co-Producing Useable Climate Information for Natural Resource Management
Environmental Management Open Access 26 September 2022
-
Evaluating stakeholder engagement in collaborative research: co-producing knowledge for climate resilience
Socio-Ecological Practice Research Open Access 22 August 2022
-
Motivations underpinning honeybee management practices: A Q methodology study with UK beekeepers
Ambio Open Access 19 May 2022
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 per month
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Get just this article for as long as you need it
$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Irwin, E. G. et al. Nat. Sustain. 1, 324–326 (2018).
Bremer, S. & Meisch, S. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Chang 8, 1–22 (2017).
Armitage, D., Berkes, F., Dale, A., Kocho-Schellenberg, E. & Patton, E. Glob. Environ. Change 21, 995–1004 (2011).
Fujitani, M., McFall, A., Randler, C. & Arlinghaus, R. Sci. Adv. 3, 1–12 (2017).
Akpo, E., Crane, T. A., Vissoh, P. V. & Tossou, R. C. J. Agric. Ext. Educ. 21, 369–388 (2015).
Lemos, M. C., Kirchhoff, C. J., Kalafatis, S. E., Scavia, D. & Rood, R. B. Weather. Clim. Soc. 6, 273–285 (2014).
Lövbrand, E. Sci. Pub. Policy 38, 225–236 (2011).
Hegger, D. & Dieperink, C. Ecol. Soc. 20, 1 (2015).
Porter, J. J. & Dessai, S. Environ. Sci. Policy 77, 9–14 (2017).
Meehan, K., Klenk, N. L. & Mendez, F. Sci. Technol. Human Values http://doi.org/gcz7wk (2017).
Klenk, N. Nat. Cult. 13, 332–355 (2018).
Newton, A. & Elliott, M. Front. Mar. Sci. 3, 1–13 (2016).
Wall, T. U., Meadow, A. M. & Horganic, A. Weather. Clim. Soc. 9, 95–107 (2017).
Spaapen, J. & van Drooge, L. Res. Eval. 20, 211–218 (2011).
Chubb, J. & Reed, M. S. Br. Politics http://doi.org/cw3x (2018).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC) under funding received from the National Science Foundation (NSF) DBI-1052875. Any opinions, findings, conclusions and recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lemos, M.C., Arnott, J.C., Ardoin, N.M. et al. To co-produce or not to co-produce. Nat Sustain 1, 722–724 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0191-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0191-0
This article is cited by
-
Practical wisdom and virtue ethics for knowledge co-production in sustainability science
Nature Sustainability (2023)
-
How does co-produced research influence adaptive capacity? Lessons from a cross-case comparison
Socio-Ecological Practice Research (2022)
-
Exploring the connection between transdisciplinary co-production and urban sustainability solutions: a case study at an urban stream management symposium
Urban Ecosystems (2022)
-
Indicators are Relational: Navigating Knowledge and Power in the Development and Implementation of Coastal-Marine Indicators
Environmental Management (2022)
-
Motivations underpinning honeybee management practices: A Q methodology study with UK beekeepers
Ambio (2022)