Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

To co-produce or not to co-produce

Researchers, stakeholders and funding organizations have embraced co-production of knowledge to solve sustainability problems. Research focusing on the practice of co-production can help us understand what works in what contexts and how to avoid potentially undesirable outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Irwin, E. G. et al. Nat. Sustain. 1, 324–326 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bremer, S. & Meisch, S. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Chang 8, 1–22 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Armitage, D., Berkes, F., Dale, A., Kocho-Schellenberg, E. & Patton, E. Glob. Environ. Change 21, 995–1004 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fujitani, M., McFall, A., Randler, C. & Arlinghaus, R. Sci. Adv. 3, 1–12 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Akpo, E., Crane, T. A., Vissoh, P. V. & Tossou, R. C. J. Agric. Ext. Educ. 21, 369–388 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lemos, M. C., Kirchhoff, C. J., Kalafatis, S. E., Scavia, D. & Rood, R. B. Weather. Clim. Soc. 6, 273–285 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lövbrand, E. Sci. Pub. Policy 38, 225–236 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hegger, D. & Dieperink, C. Ecol. Soc. 20, 1 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Porter, J. J. & Dessai, S. Environ. Sci. Policy 77, 9–14 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Meehan, K., Klenk, N. L. & Mendez, F. Sci. Technol. Human Values http://doi.org/gcz7wk (2017).

  11. Klenk, N. Nat. Cult. 13, 332–355 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Newton, A. & Elliott, M. Front. Mar. Sci. 3, 1–13 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wall, T. U., Meadow, A. M. & Horganic, A. Weather. Clim. Soc. 9, 95–107 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Spaapen, J. & van Drooge, L. Res. Eval. 20, 211–218 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chubb, J. & Reed, M. S. Br. Politics http://doi.org/cw3x (2018).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC) under funding received from the National Science Foundation (NSF) DBI-1052875. Any opinions, findings, conclusions and recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Carmen Lemos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lemos, M.C., Arnott, J.C., Ardoin, N.M. et al. To co-produce or not to co-produce. Nat Sustain 1, 722–724 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0191-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0191-0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene